Abstract
The transmembrane transcriptional activators ToxR and TcpP modulate expression of Vibrio cholerae virulence factors by exerting control over toxT, which encodes the cytoplasmic transcriptional activator of the ctx, tcp, and acf virulence genes. However, ToxR, independently of TcpP and ToxT, activates and represses transcription of the genes encoding two outer-membrane porins, OmpU and OmpT. To determine the role of ToxR-dependent porin regulation in V. cholerae pathogenesis, the ToxR-activated ompU promoter was used to drive ompT transcription in a strain lacking OmpU. Likewise, the ToxR-repressed ompT promoter was used to drive ompU transcription in a strain lacking both ToxR and OmpT. This strategy allowed the generation of a toxR+ strain that expresses OmpT in place of OmpU, and a toxR− strain that expresses OmpU in place of OmpT. Growth rates in the presence of bile salts and other anionic detergents were retarded for the toxR+ V. cholerae expressing OmpT in place of OmpU, but increased in toxR− V. cholerae expressing OmpU in place of OmpT. Additionally, the toxR+ V. cholerae expressing OmpT in place of OmpU expressed less cholera toxin and toxin-coregulated pilus, and this effect was shown to be caused by reduced toxT transcription in this strain. Finally, the toxR+ V. cholerae expressing OmpT in place of OmpU was ≈100-fold reduced in its ability to colonize the infant-mouse intestine. Our results indicate that ToxR-dependent modulation of the outer membrane porins OmpU and OmpT is critical for V. cholerae bile resistance, virulence factor expression, and intestinal colonization.
Vibrio cholerae is a Gram-negative bacterium that causes the potentially fatal human disease cholera. The dramatic diarrheal dehydration of cholera is primarily caused by the effect of cholera toxin (CT), an ADP-ribosylating toxin that increases host cell cAMP levels (1). Within the small intestine, the bacteria synthesize CT and other virulence factors, including the toxin-coregulated pilus (TCP), which is required for intestinal colonization (2). Coordinate expression of virulence factors is mediated by the transcriptional activator ToxR, a transmembrane protein with a cytoplasmic DNA-binding domain (3). A second transmembrane transcriptional activator, TcpP, is required in vitro for ToxR-mediated transcription of the toxT gene, which encodes the cytoplasmic transcriptional activator of the genes encoding CT, TCP, and accessory colonization factors (4–6). Induction of this ToxR-dependent virulence cascade in vitro requires defined but artificial growth conditions, whereas induction within the host is presumed to involve yet unknown environmental signals present within the intestine (7).
ToxR, however, independently of the transcriptional activators TcpP and ToxT, modulates expression of two outer membrane porins, OmpU and OmpT (8–10). Transcription of ompU is induced by ToxR, whereas transcription of ompT is repressed by ToxR (11, 12). This results in virtually exclusive OmpU expression in toxR+ strains and OmpT expression in toxR− strains, at least under laboratory growth conditions. Although genes encoding TcpP, ToxT, CT, and TCP are specifically associated with V. cholerae, ToxR is found in other Vibrio and Photobacterium species and regulates porin expression in these other bacteria as well (13, 14). Thus, ToxR-dependent modulation of porins apparently preceded, and possibly contributed to, the evolution of V. cholerae as a human pathogen, but little is known about the potential role of OmpU and OmpT in V. cholerae pathogenesis. It has been suggested that OmpU may act as an adhesin during intestinal colonization (15), although subsequent studies have disputed this (16). Our previous studies suggested a role for OmpU in bile resistance, because ToxR-dependent ompU transcription is stimulated by the presence of bile, and toxR− strains, which express low amounts of OmpU, are more bile sensitive (17).
The current study uncovers a role for ToxR-dependent porin modulation in V. cholerae virulence. V. cholerae strains were genetically manipulated to force a “porin swap,” i.e., a toxR+ strain that expresses OmpT in place of OmpU and a toxR− strain that expresses OmpU in place of OmpT. This strategy allowed us to dissect the role of each porin regardless of the presence/absence of ToxR. We found that porin modulation plays an important role in V. cholerae pathogenesis, including bile resistance, virulence factor expression, and intestinal colonization.
Materials and Methods
Bacterial Strains.
Escherichia coli DH5α was used for cloning (18) whereas strain SM10λpir (8) was used to transfer plasmids into V. cholerae by conjugation. V. cholerae strains used in this study were all isogenic with the classical 0395 Ogawa strain (19). V. cholerae strain KKV780 contains a 825-bp in-frame deletion within ompU (ΔompU), strain KKV1089 contains ΔompU and additionally toxT∷lacZ (4), strain KKV804 contains a 819-bp in-frame deletion within ompT (ΔompT), and additionally contains Δ toxR1 (20), and strain KKV526 contains ΔtoxR1 and toxT∷lacZ. These strains were constructed by using pCVD442 (21); characterization of these strains will be described in greater detail in an upcoming report.
Construction of Plasmids for Ectopic Expression of ompU and ompT.
The promoters of ompU and ompT were amplified with PCR primers; the resultant fragments correspond to −674 to +149 with respect to the ompU transcription start site (11) and −429 to +104 with respect to the ompT transcription start site (12). The entire ORFs of ompU and ompT, 1,025 and 1,034 bp, respectively (12, 22), were PCR amplified and cloned downstream of either promoter sequence in the low copy number vector pWSK30 (23). Use of a NdeI site in both promoter and ORF fragments corresponding with the initiating Met codon allowed for exact translational fusions of the promoter fragments to the respective porin ORFs (Fig. 1A). The four resulting plasmids carry the following fusions: pKEK253, ompU promoter-ompU ORF (Up-U); pKEK257, ompU promoter-ompT ORF (Up-T); pKEK255, ompT promoter-ompT ORF (Tp-T); and pKEK256, ompT promoter-ompU ORF (Tp-U).
Growth Conditions and Growth Kinetics.
For all experiments, V. cholerae strains were grown in LB with appropriate antibiotics. Growth rate assays with anionic detergents were performed as described (17). Inducing conditions for virulence factor expression were 30°C, LB pH 6.5 and noninducing conditions were 30°C, LB pH 8.5.
Tissue Culture Adherence Assay.
Microscopic and quantitative adherence assays with HEp-2 cells were performed as described (15), except Accustain formalin fixative (Sigma) was used to fix cells for microscopic analysis. Each well was seeded with ≈3 × 105 HEp-2 cells. Bacteria added and recovered were quantitated by plate counts, and adherence is expressed as the percent of bacteria adhered from the total added.
Detection of Protein Expression.
V. cholerae total proteins were resolved by SDS/PAGE on 10% acrylamide gels and stained with Coomassie brilliant blue. Western blot was performed with rabbit polyclonal antisera against V. cholerae OmpU or OmpT (a kind gift of J. Peterson, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston) by using the enhanced chemiluminescence ECL detection system (Amersham Pharmacia). Culture supernatants were assayed for CT secretion by the ganglioside M1 ELISA by using polyclonal mouse antiserum against the purified B subunit of CT (24). TCP expression was determined by transduction with CTXΦ-Km (25). β-galactosidase assays were performed as described (26) by using strains O395 toxT∷lacZ (4), KKV526, and KKV1089 carrying either pWSK30 (23), pKEK253, or pKEK257.
In Vivo Colonization Assay.
The infant mouse colonization assay has been described (27). Briefly, wild-type strain KKV598 (O395 ΔlacZ) was mixed with KKV780 (ΔompU) carrying either pKEK253 (Up-U) or pKEK257 (Up-T); mixtures were given in a peroral inoculum ratio of approximately 105 mutant/105 wild type to 5-day-old CD-1 suckling mice. After a 22-h period of colonization, homogenates from the isolated small intestines were collected and the ratio of mutant/wild type was determined by plating on LB agar containing X-Gal. Tubes (5 ml) of LB were inoculated with the same mixtures and grown at 37°C for in vitro competition.
Results
Ectopic Expression of OmpU and OmpT.
Because ToxR activates ompU transcription and represses ompT transcription, a toxR+ V. cholerae strain expresses OmpU and a toxR− strain expresses OmpT (Fig. 1 B and C, lanes 1 and 2). The alteration of ToxR-dependent porin expression was accomplished in two steps. First, a large in-frame chromosomal deletion of ompU was constructed in a toxR+ strain, resulting in no detectable expression of OmpU (Fig. 1 B and C, lane 3). Also, a large in-frame chromosomal deletion of ompT was constructed in a toxR− strain (ΔompT ΔtoxR), resulting in no detectable expression of OmpT (Fig. 1 B and C, lane 6).
Next, the ompU and ompT promoter sequences were fused to either the ompU or ompT coding sequence. This was accomplished by introducing a NdeI site at the initiating Met codon, allowing for an exact translational fusion of the ompU promoter to the ompT coding sequence (Up-T) and an exact translational fusion of the ompT promoter to the ompU coding sequence (Tp-U; Fig. 1A). Finally, the Up-T plasmid was transformed into the toxR+ ΔompU strain, which resulted in ectopic OmpT expression in place of OmpU (Fig. 1 B and C, lane 5). Likewise, the Tp-U plasmid transformed into the ΔtoxR ΔompT strain resulted in ectopic expression of OmpU in place of OmpT (Fig. 1 B and C, lane 8). Control plasmids containing the ompU promoter fused to the ompU ORF (Up-U) and the ompT promoter fused to the ompT ORF (Tp-T) fully complemented the ΔompU and ΔompT mutations with respect to protein expression, respectively (Fig. 1 B and C, lanes 4 and 7). OmpU and OmpT were localized in outer membrane fractions as expected (data not shown). These results demonstrate ectopic expression of OmpT in place of OmpU in a toxR+ strain, and the ectopic expression of OmpU in place of OmpT in a toxR− strain.
Alteration of ToxR-Dependent Porin Regulation Alters Growth Kinetics of V. cholerae in the Presence of Anionic Detergents.
Recent evidence has demonstrated that toxR− V. cholerae have lower minimum bactericidal concentrations and retarded growth kinetics compared with toxR+ strains when grown in the presence of the anionic detergents bile, the bile salt deoxycholate (DC), or SDS (17). To determine whether the detergent-sensitive phenotype may be caused specifically by OmpT expression in the toxR− strain, we tested growth kinetics of the toxR+ strain ectopically expressing OmpT in place of OmpU in SDS and DC. The toxR+ strain expressing OmpT (ΔompU/Up-T) had lower relative growth rates in both DC and SDS over a wide concentration range compared with the toxR+ strain expressing OmpU (ΔompU/Up-U; Fig. 2 A and C). Likewise, a toxR− strain expressing OmpU had higher relative growth rates in both DC and SDS compared with the toxR− strain expressing OmpT (Fig. 2 B and D). Notably, all strains grew at the same rates in the absence of DC or SDS. These experiments demonstrate that at least one of the ToxR-dependent factors modulating bile resistance are the porins OmpU and OmpT, as we hypothesized (17), and that OmpU has a protective role in V. cholerae resistance to anionic detergents.
A V. cholerae toxR+ Strain Expressing OmpT in Place of OmpU Has Diminished CT and TCP Expression.
V. cholerae wild-type O395 grown under inducing laboratory conditions expresses CT and TCP, which can be measured by ganglioside M1-ELISA and CTXφ transduction, respectively (Table 1; Materials and Methods). High levels of TCP expression under these conditions also result in a visible agglutination (Agg+) phenotype. In contrast, a toxR− strain has no detectable CT or TCP expression and an Agg− phenotype (Table 1). The toxR+ strain expressing OmpT in place of OmpU (ΔompU/Up-T) grown under inducing conditions displayed an Agg− phenotype, and expressed ≈100-fold less CT than the wild-type strain or the toxR+ strain expressing OmpU (ΔompU/Up-U). There were also ≈100-fold less CTXφ transductants of the toxR+ strain expressing OmpT in place of OmpU, indicating less TCP expression in this strain compared with the wild-type strain or the toxR+ strain expressing OmpU. These reductions in CT and TCP expression are caused by the presence of OmpT rather than by the absence of OmpU, because the ΔompU strain expresses ≈ wild-type levels of CT and TCP. These results indicate that ToxR-dependent regulation of the outer membrane porins is important for CT and TCP expression.
Table 1.
Relevant genotype* | Plasmid† | Agg | TCP‡ | CT§ | toxT∷lacZ¶ | % HEp-2‖ adherence |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wild type (toxR+) | pWSK30 | + | 8.4 × 104 | 1010 | 96 ± 5 | 9.1 (4.3) |
ΔtoxR | pWSK30 | − | 0 | <1 | 15 ± 1 | 3.4 (2.7) |
ΔompU (toxR+) | pWSK30 | + | 8.6 × 104 | 880 | 115 ± 6 | 10.0 (4.3) |
ΔompU (toxR+) | Up-U | + | 4.4 × 104 | 935 | 111 ± 5 | 2.5 (2.9) |
ΔompU (toxR+) | Up-T | − | 7.7 × 102 | 10 | 62 ± 6 | 4.3 (6.1) |
Actual strains used (see Materials and Methods) O395, KKV61, KKV780, O395 toxT∷lacZ, KKV526, and KKV1089.
Plasmids used (see Materials and Methods): Up-U, pKEK253; and Up-T, pKEK257.
CTXΦKan transductants/ml/OD600.
ng/ml/OD600.
Miller units based on triplicate samples.
% adherent bacteria of total added; shown in parentheses are results of a second independent experiment.
A V. cholerae toxR+ Strain Expressing OmpT in Place of OmpU Has Diminished toxT Transcription.
Because the ctx and tcp genes are coordinately transcribed by ToxT, and the toxR+ strain expressing OmpT in place of OmpU expresses diminished levels of CT and TCP, we hypothesized this may be caused by either (i) decreased toxT transcription or (ii) decreased ToxT transcriptional activity. We favor the former possibility, because expression of toxT from a ToxR-independent lac promoter (pKEK162; ref. 28) in the toxR+ strain expressing OmpT in place of OmpU resulted in high levels of CT and TCP expression and an Agg+ phenotype (data not shown), indicating a probable reduction of toxT transcription rather than lack of ToxT activity in this strain.
Table 1 shows transcriptional activation of a toxT∷lacZ chromosomal transcriptional fusion in the strains grown under inducing conditions (pH 6.5). The toxR+ strain expressing OmpT in place of OmpU (ΔompU/Up-T) displayed lower levels of toxT transcription compared with the same strain expressing OmpU (ΔompU/Up-U) or a wild-type strain. Notably, the decrease in toxT transcription in the ΔompU/Up-T strain is caused by the presence of OmpT rather than by the absence of OmpU, because the ΔompU strain itself transcribed approximately wild-type levels of toxT. The same strains grown under noninducing conditions (pH 8.5) all transcribed low levels of toxT (15–20 Miller units; data not shown). We hypothesize that the relatively small observed changes in ToxR-dependent toxT transcription would result in the larger observed differences in CT and TCP expression due to ToxT driving its own transcription from the tcpA promoter (29), thus resulting in an amplification of ToxT levels. These results demonstrate that expression of OmpT in place of OmpU has a negative effect on toxT transcriptional activation, which appears to result in decreased virulence factor expression in vitro.
Adherence of V. cholerae to Cultured Epithelial Cells Is Not Affected by the Presence or Absence of OmpU or OmpT.
Previous reports suggested a role for OmpU in V. cholerae adherence to cultured epithelial cells, because polyclonal antisera against OmpU could block adherence (15). By using the same experimental procedures, we tested the various V. cholerae strains expressing OmpU, OmpT, or neither, for adherence to HEp-2 cells (Table 1). Similar levels of adherence were seen, regardless of the presence or absence of either OmpU or OmpT, in both toxR+ and toxR− strains. Microscopic evaluation of Giemsa-stained HEp-2 cells (not shown) confirmed the results obtained from the quantitative experiments.
Ectopic Expression of OmpT in Place of OmpU Reduces V. cholerae Intestinal Colonization.
To determine the role of ToxR-dependent porin modulation in intestinal colonization, an in vivo competition experiment was performed in suckling mice. The toxR+ strain expressing OmpU (ΔompU/Up-U) colonizes like a wild-type strain, as expected, and has a competitive index similar to a wild-type strain [(competitive index) c.i. 2.3 ± 1.3; Fig. 3]. However, the toxR+ strain expressing OmpT in place of OmpU (ΔompU/Up-T) demonstrated a significant colonization defect (P < 0.01), being outcompeted ≈100-fold in vivo by the wild-type strain (c.i. 0.008 ± 0.006). The competitive index of this strain in vitro is similar to wild type (c.i. 0.591), indicating that the in vivo colonization defect is not caused by a general growth defect. These results suggest that expression of OmpT in place of OmpU is deleterious to V. cholerae intestinal colonization, and thus ToxR-dependent regulation of porins is critical for V. cholerae pathogenesis.
Discussion
In the current study, the construction of a toxR+ V. cholerae strain that expresses the ToxR-repressed porin OmpT in place of the ToxR-activated porin OmpU has allowed us to dissect the role these porins play in V. cholerae pathogenesis. Amazingly, merely substituting one outer membrane porin for another resulted in a number of attenuated pathogenic properties, including bile resistance, virulence factor expression, and intestinal colonization. ToxR-dependent regulation of outer membrane porins appears to have preceded the evolution of V. cholerae, because ToxR performs similar functions in other members of the Vibrionaceae (14, 17). However, these other bacteria do not have the additional regulatory factors TcpP and ToxT whose genes are located on the V. cholerae-specific pathogenicity island VPI (30). The recruitment of the ancestral ToxR protein into the virulence regulatory cascade involving recently acquired elements ties porin regulation to pathogenesis. We suggest that the contribution of porin regulation to bile resistance is one of the factors that led to the evolution of V. cholerae as an intestinal pathogen and the recruitment of ToxR into the virulence cascade.
Our results demonstrate that ToxR-dependent regulation of OmpU and OmpT clearly affects bile resistance, with OmpU playing a protective role relative to OmpT. The difference in bile sensitivity between V. cholerae containing OmpU or OmpT is likely caused by the selectivity of the porins themselves. The E. coli outer membrane porins OmpF and OmpC also affect bile resistance, with OmpC playing a protective role compared with OmpF (31). Both OmpF and OmpC are cation selective, but OmpC is more cation selective than OmpF and thus would be predicted to allow less passage of negatively charged molecules, such as bile salts or other anionic detergents (32). Our results are consistent with V. cholerae OmpU having similar ion selectivity to E. coli OmpC and V. cholerae OmpT having similar ion selectivity to E. coli OmpF. Presumably, the facilitated passage of anionic detergents through OmpT would lead to disruption of the bile-sensitive cytoplasmic membrane and lower growth rates at sublethal concentrations.
The presence of OmpT in place of OmpU in a toxR+ strain leads to decreased toxT transcription, resulting in decreased CT and TCP expression. Thus, the ToxR-dependent regulation of the outer membrane porins directly affects virulence factor expression. pH is the inducing signal used to stimulate toxT transcription in the in vitro studies performed here, but the true environmental signals that induce toxT transcription within the intestine have not been identified (33). The ion selectivity of the porins likely affects the passage of charged inducing (or repressing) signals across the outer membrane, such as pH induction, that influence ToxR- and TcpP-dependent transcription of toxT. We have shown that ToxR-dependent transcription of ompU is increased in the presence of bile (17). On arrival in the intestine, therefore, the presence of bile should induce increased ToxR-dependent OmpU expression (and simultaneous repression of OmpT), resulting in the correct synthesis of outer membrane porins necessary to allow maximal induction of virulence factor expression. Thus, one function of the ToxR-dependent and ToxT-independent omp regulatory branch (9) may be to facilitate sensing of the inducing signals that stimulate the ToxR- and ToxT-dependent ctx and tcp regulatory branch.
The toxR+ strain expressing OmpT in place of OmpU is diminished in its ability to colonize the infant mouse intestine, demonstrating the importance of porin regulation in V. cholerae pathogenesis. Although we have not ruled out a role for OmpU as an adhesin in vivo, we were unable to demonstrate any decrease in adherence in strains lacking ompU in vitro. Rather, we speculate that the decreased bile resistance and virulence factor expression seen in this strain in vitro contribute to its decreased colonization in vivo. In Bordetella pathogenesis, ectopic expression of the Vir-repressed flagellar regulon reduces colonization (34). Our results demonstrate that the ectopic expression of the ToxR-repressed porin OmpT is deleterious to V. cholerae colonization, consistent with an important role for ToxR not only in the activation of specific genes, including ompU and toxT, but also repression of other gene(s), including ompT, during V. cholerae intestinal colonization. Previous reports have shown reduced virulence when certain pathogenic bacteria, including Salmonella typhimurium (35) and Shigella flexneri (36), contained knockout mutations in major outer membrane porins, which may have altered outer membrane structure and/or integrity. We have demonstrated virulence defects when one porin is substituted for another, suggesting a relationship between porin function and pathogenesis.
Acknowledgments
We thank J. Peterson for providing antisera, M. Waldor for providing CTXΦKan, C. Hase for providing the toxT∷lacZ strain, and M. Blaylock for assistance with adherence assays. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Training Grant AI07271–15 to D.P. and an institutional new faculty award of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute to K.E.K.
Abbreviations
- CT
cholera toxin
- TCP
toxin-coregulated pilus
- DC
deoxycholate
- ΔompU
deletion within ompU
- Up-U
ompU promoter-ompU ORF
- Up-T
ompU promoter-ompT ORF
- Tp-U
omp-T promoter-ompU ORF
- Tp-T
ompT promoter-ompT ORF
Footnotes
This paper was submitted directly (Track II) to the PNAS office.
Article published online before print: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 10.1073/pnas.170219997.
Article and publication date are at www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.170219997
References
- 1.Kaper J B, Fasano A, Trucksis M. In: Vibrio cholerae and Cholera: Molecular to Global Perspectives. Wachsmuth I K, Blake P A, Olsvik O, editors. Washington, DC: Am. Soc. Microbiol.; 1994. pp. 145–176. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Taylor R K, Miller V L, Furlong D B, Mekalanos J J. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1987;84:2833–2837. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.9.2833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Miller V L, Taylor R K, Mekalanos J J. Cell. 1987;48:271–279. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90430-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hase C C, Mekalanos J J. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:730–734. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.2.730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.DiRita V J, Parsot C, Jander G, Mekalanos J J. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991;88:5403–5407. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.12.5403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Higgins D E, Nazareno E, DiRita V J. J Bacteriol. 1992;174:6974–6980. doi: 10.1128/jb.174.21.6974-6980.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.DiRita V J, Neely M, Taylor R K, Bruss P M. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:7991–7995. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.15.7991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Miller V L, Mekalanos J J. J Bacteriol. 1988;170:2575–2583. doi: 10.1128/jb.170.6.2575-2583.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Champion G A, Neely M N, Brennan M A, DiRita V J. Mol Microbiol. 1997;23:323–331. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.2191585.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chakrabarti S R, Chaudhuri K, Sen K, Das J. J Bacteriol. 1996;178:524–530. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.2.524-530.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Crawford J A, Kaper J B, DiRita V J. Mol Microbiol. 1998;29:235–246. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00925.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Li C C, Crawford J A, DiRita V J, Kaper J B. Mol Microbiol. 2000;35:189–203. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01699.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Osorio C R, Klose K E. J Bacteriol. 2000;182:526–528. doi: 10.1128/jb.182.2.526-528.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Welch T J, Bartlett D H. Mol Microbiol. 1998;27:977–985. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00742.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sperandio V, Giron J A, Silveira W D, Kaper J B. Infect Immun. 1995;63:4433–4438. doi: 10.1128/iai.63.11.4433-4438.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Nakasone N, Iwanaga M. Infect Immun. 1998;66:4726–4728. doi: 10.1128/iai.66.10.4726-4728.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Provenzano D, Schuhmacher D A, Barker J L, Klose K E. Infect Immun. 2000;68:1491–1497. doi: 10.1128/iai.68.3.1491-1497.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hanahan D. J Mol Biol. 1983;166:577–580. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(83)80284-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mekalanos J J, Swartz D J, Pearson G D, Harford N, Groyne F, de Wilde M. Nature (London) 1983;306:551–557. doi: 10.1038/306551a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Klose K E, Mekalanos J J. J Bacteriol. 1998;180:303–316. doi: 10.1128/jb.180.2.303-316.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Donnenberg M S, Kaper J B. Infect Immun. 1991;59:4310–4317. doi: 10.1128/iai.59.12.4310-4317.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sperandio V, Bailey C, Giron J A, DiRita V J, Silveira W D, Vettore A L, Kaper J B. Infect Immun. 1996;64:5406–5409. doi: 10.1128/iai.64.12.5406-5409.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wang R F, Kushner S. Gene. 1991;100:195–199. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Svennerholm A M, Holmgren J. Curr Microbiol. 1978;1:19–23. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Waldor M K, Mekalanos J J. Science. 1996;272:1910–1914. doi: 10.1126/science.272.5270.1910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Miller J H. A Short Course in Bacterial Genetics. Plainview, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Lab. Press; 1992. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gardel C L, Mekalanos J J. Infect Immun. 1996;64:2246–2255. doi: 10.1128/iai.64.6.2246-2255.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Schuhmacher D A, Klose K E. J Bacteriol. 1999;181:1508–1514. doi: 10.1128/jb.181.5.1508-1514.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Medrano A I, DiRita V J, Castillo G, Sanchez J. Infect Immun. 1999;67:2178–2183. doi: 10.1128/iai.67.5.2178-2183.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Karaolis D K, Johnson J A, Bailey C C, Boedeker E C, Kaper J B, Reeves P R. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:3134–3139. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.6.3134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Thanassi D G, Cheng L W, Nikaido H. J Bacteriol. 1997;179:2512–2518. doi: 10.1128/jb.179.8.2512-2518.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hancock R E W, Schmidt A, Bauer K, Benz R. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1986;860:263–267. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(86)90522-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Skorupski K, Taylor R K. Mol Microbiol. 1997;25:1003–1009. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.5481909.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Akerley B J, Cotter P A, Miller J F. Cell. 1995;80:611–620. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90515-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Chatfield S N, Dorman C J, Hayward C, Dougan G. Infect Immun. 1991;59:449–452. doi: 10.1128/iai.59.1.449-452.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bernardini M L, Sanna M G, Fontaine A, Sansonetti P J. Infect Immun. 1993;61:3625–3635. doi: 10.1128/iai.61.9.3625-3635.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]