Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Sep;52(3):516–529. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e3181b5a395

Transdermal estradiol for postpartum depression: A promising treatment option

Eydie L Moses-Kolko 1, Sarah L Berga 2, Brinda Kalro 3, Dorothy KY Sit 4, Katherine L Wisner 5
PMCID: PMC2782667  NIHMSID: NIHMS139492  PMID: 19661765

Abstract

Postpartum depression (PPD) is the most common complication of childbirth and affects one out of seven childbearing women. While conventional pharmacological and psychotherapeutic antidepressant treatments are effective for PPD, a natural alternative may be preferred by postpartum women, especially those who breastfeed their infants. The treatment of PPD with synthetic forms of naturally occurring estrogen is mechanistically appealing because PPD occurs in the context of estrogen withdrawal at parturition. Preliminary evidence suggests that PPD is a disorder of hormone-related mood dysregulation (similar to perimenopausal depression) that can be effectively treated with estrogen. This review provides the basic science and clinical background as well as safety considerations to support the application of transdermal estradiol as a treatment for PPD. We conclude that estradiol treatment for PPD requires confirmation of efficacy in a randomized clinical trial prior to routine clinical use as monotherapy. Additional data regarding maternal tolerability of cyclic progestins, long-term safety of estradiol treatment, estradiol passage into breastmilk and infants, and interdisciplinary collaboration among psychiatrists and gynecologists is also needed before estradiol is used in women who decline or fail to respond to first-line antidepressant treatments, or as an augmentation of conventional antidepressant treatment.

Keywords: postpartum depression, transdermal estradiol

Postpartum depression –its public health impact, treatment, and the demand for novel therapeutics

Postpartum depression (PPD) is a major public health concern (Healthy People 2010, Objective 16-5c; (Wisner et al 2006a)). PPD (which includes both major and minor depression) affects at least 14.5% (one out of seven) of women in their first three months postpartum (Gaynes et al 2005) with rates that rise to 23% - 59% among inner-city (Hobfoll et al 1995) and adolescent mothers (Trad 1995). Suicide is a leading cause of death in new mothers, and suicidal thoughts and non-fatal self-harm behaviors are prevalent in this population (Lindahl et al 2005). The sequelae of PPD include not only maternal low mood and anxiety (Hendrick et al 2000; Wisner et al 1999), but also deleterious effects of impaired maternal caregiving (England 1994; Kendler et al 1993) on child development (Grace et al 2003; Murray and Cooper 1997).

Randomized clinical trials (RCT) have demonstrated that pharmacologic and psychotherapy antidepressant treatments are as effective for PPD (Appleby et al 1997; O'Hara et al 2000; Wisner et al 2006b) as they are for major depressive disorder that occurs in non-postpartum women (Walsh et al 2002). Nortriptyline and sertraline treatment of PPD were both associated with approximately 60% rates of response and 50% rates of remission (Wisner et al 2006b). Twelve-week interpersonal psychotherapy was associated with a 37.5% remission rate relative to 13.7% in the waiting list control group (O'Hara et al 2000), an index of efficacy that is similar to that demonstrated in non-postpartum populations (de Mello et al 2005). Replicated studies reveal negligible passage of sertraline, paroxetine, and nortriptyline into the sera of nursing infants (Weissman et al 2004), thus making psychotropic treatment in PPD more widespread for breastfeeding mothers. These landmark clinical studies have demonstrated that conventional antidepressant treatments are effective for women with PPD.

Notwithstanding progress made in PPD treatment, antidepressant remission rates of 30-50% in PPD and in major depressive disorder (MDD) (Trivedi et al 2006) leave a large void to be filled with novel treatments. Estradiol treatment is one such novel therapy that shows promise for the achievement of more rapid and higher rates of remission in PPD (Ahokas et al 2001a; Gregoire et al 1996b) similar to what has been demonstrated in perimenopause-onset depression (Schmidt et al 2000; Soares et al 2001). The robust antidepressant effect of estradiol is putatively related to estradiol-mediated normalization of hormonally-sensitive neural circuits of depression that are activated during PPD and other reproductive hormone-related mood disorders (Berman et al 1997; Bloch et al 2000; Dreher et al 2007). In addition to being potentially more efficacious than conventional antidepressant treatment, estradiol might also be more acceptable to women with PPD who perceive that hormonal treatments more directly address the etiology of their disorder. Estradiol may also be regarded as a natural therapeutic that overcomes the stigma of conventional treatments (Kelly and Jorm 2007).

Epidemiological, clinical research, and basic science evidence which support estradiol as a therapeutic for PPD

Epidemiological studies converge to powerfully suggest that female gonadal steroid fluctuations can lower the threshold for emergence of mood disorder symptoms and episodes (Rubinow 2006). This theory is substantiated by the 2-3.5-fold increase in risk for psychiatric hospitalization due to incident PPD in the 5 months after childbirth (Munk-Olsen et al 2006), the 2-5-fold risk for MDE and depressive symptoms in perimenopausal compared to premenopausal women (Cohen et al 2006; Freeman et al 2006), and the 1.7-fold increased risk for major depression in women relative to men during childbearing years that begins during puberty (Kessler 2000; Kessler et al 2007). Furthermore, susceptibility to depressed mood during one reproductive transition (ie: premenstrual dysphoric disorder) confers vulnerability for future reproductive hormone-related mood disorders (Freeman et al 2004; Parry 1995; Payne et al 2007).

As evidenced by hormone manipulation experiments, the ovarian hormones estradiol and progesterone are potent modulators of individual risk for reproductive hormone-related mood disorders. In women with premenstrual dysphoric disorder, mood symptoms remitted in 66% of women following ovarian suppression with the gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist leuprolide. Symptoms re-emerged after add-back of estradiol and progesterone in concentrations that approximated the mid-luteal phase (Schmidt et al 1998). Similar findings emerged in a perinatal simulation study in which leuprolide-suppressed women were given and then withdrawn from estradiol doses that simulated peak menstrual cycle concentrations and progesterone doses that simulated mid-gestation concentrations. Among women with a history of PPD, 63% experienced depressive symptom increase during addition of combined estradiol and progesterone which peaked during withdrawal of these hormones (Bloch et al 2000). In both studies, women without reproductive hormone-related mood disorders experienced no significant mood symptoms during hormonal manipulation. These experiments point to important neuromodulatory effects of both estradiol and progesterone in vulnerable women. We focus on estradiol in this manuscript.

Estradiol appears to function as an antidepressant through mechanisms inherent in traditional psychotropics (Duman et al 1997; Manji et al 2001) in widespread regions of the cortex and limbic brain (Gundlah et al 2000). Estradiol promotes neurite outgrowth and neuronal survival in hypothalamus, amygdala, hippocampus, dopaminergic neurons, and prefrontal cortex (Lee and McEwen 2001). Pro-monoaminergic effects of estradiol include enhancement of norepinephrine, dopamine (McEwen and Alves 1999), cholinergic (Gibbs and Aggarwal 1998), and serotonin systems (Bethea et al 2000; Osterlund et al 2000; Pecins-Thompson and Bethea 1999). Estradiol also mitigates against oxidative stress, glutamateric excitotoxicity, and β-amyloid toxicity (Amantea et al 2005). A potential role for estradiol to modulate feedback regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis (Cizza et al 1997) is yet another mechanism by which estradiol may act as a psychotropic.

Clinical trials of Estradiol for the Treatment of PPD: efficacy, safety, and future directions

PPD is a disorder that is particularly well-suited for estradiol treatment because it occurs after 100-fold decreases in ambient estradiol between late pregnancy and 48 hours post-parturition. Two published trials suggest that PPD treatment response to estradiol (∼80%) exceeds that of standard antidepressants [50.1%± 9.0%; (Walsh et al 2002)]. Gregoire et al (Gregoire et al 1996a) enrolled 61, non-breastfeeding women who presented within 18 months of delivery. Subjects had severe depressive symptoms, reported as mean Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Screening Scale (EPDS)(Cox et al 1987) score of 21.6 ± 3.0. The EPDS is a widely used screening scale for PPD in which scores of 10 or higher are highly sensitive for the presence of postpartum major depression (Cox et al 1987; Peindl et al 2004). An EPDS score of 21 roughly corresponds to a Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item score of 28 (Wisner et al, unpublished). Women were randomized to 6 months of treatment with placebo or high dose transdermal 17β-estradiol (200 mcg/day). The mean estradiol concentration of actively treated women was 680 pmol/L (nearly twice the mean estradiol concentration across the menstrual cycle, which is ∼ 370 pmol/L). Within one month of treatment, EPDS scores of the estradiol-treated group were 4 points lower on average compared to the placebo-treated group. Because assessments were done once a month, the time course of symptom improvement in the early weeks of treatment is unknown and may be substantially earlier. At 3 months of treatment, 80% of the estradiol group had EPDS scores <14, whereas only 31% of placebo group had scores <14 (corresponds to a Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item score of <15) (Wisner et al, unpublished). By study completion (6 months), EPDS scores in both groups had decreased; however, the EPDS scores for only the estradiol-treated subjects (score range was 6-9; 4.38 points lower than the placebo group) were consistent with resolution of the major depressive episode (Hanusa et al 2008; Peindl et al 2004).

Ahokas et al. (Ahokas et al 2001b) treated 23 postpartum, severely depressed (mean Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale score; MADRS= 40) women who presented within 12 months of birth. Thirteen participants were breastfeeding. The women were hypogonadal (mean estradiol=80 pmol/L) and half met criteria for gonadal failure. They were treated openly with sublingual 17β-estradiol (4.8 mg/day) for 8 weeks. The subjects' mean estradiol concentration by study completion rose to 478 pmol/L. Within one week of treatment, 21 of 23 subjects had 50% symptom score reductions and by two weeks, 19 of 23 (83%) subjects achieved remission (MADRS score ≤7). An inverse relationship between estradiol concentration and MADRS score was noted.

Estradiol treatment was well-tolerated in both studies as judged by low attrition. A suicide occurred in the randomized trial after estradiol was replaced with progesterone during a psychiatric hospitalization (Gregoire et al 1996a). Women with contraindications to estradiol treatment, such as histories of thromboembolic events or uterine and breast disease were excluded, and no reports of adverse events were reported in the cited studies. During scheduled endometrial curettage at the study conclusion (6 months), endometrial changes were found in 3 participants, despite co-administration of dydrogesterone1 (10mg/day, 12 days per month in the final 3 months of the estradiol trial), which resolved at follow-up (Gregoire et al 1996a). Breast tenderness, headache, nausea and vomiting led to estradiol discontinuation in 3 of 6 women who were treated transdermally with 100 mcg/day in a study of non-depressed women (Perheentupa et al 2004). In contrast, low attrition in the estradiol trials for depression suggests that depressed women may have fewer estradiol side effects than non-depressed women.

While these studies support the treatment of PPD with estradiol, study design limitations weaken the evidence base for adding estradiol to the therapeutic armamentarium for PPD. In the randomized trial, the inclusion of women who took concurrent antidepressant medications (47% and 37% in the estradiol and placebo arms, respectively) limits the ability to discern an estradiol-specific treatment effect versus an augmentation effect. The EPDS is a self-report scale; the validity of the findings would be increased if they were confirmed with a clinician interview-based measure. The exclusion of breastfeeding women and the inclusion of severely depressed women (mean baseline EPDS=21 which corresponds to a 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression Scale score of 28) but not women with mild or minor depression also limit the study's generalizability. In both studies, women who presented for treatment up to 12-18 months postpartum were included. This time frame is far removed from the estradiol withdrawal at delivery that theoretically contributes to PPD risk and is a primary rationale for estradiol treatment. Because epidemiological and translational research (Okun et al In press; Sanjuan et al 2008) converge on an early postpartum timeframe for depression vulnerability, this might also be an ideal time to treat. Whether higher rates of estradiol treatment response and remission can be achieved in women with PPD onset proximal to delivery (ie: within a month postpartum) remains to be tested. Results of ongoing RCT of estradiol for PPD (http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00744328?term=wisner&rank=4; http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00059228?order=1) will buttress the evidence base for this potential therapy.

Selection of an estrogen formulation for PPD treatment

Of fundamental importance is the fact that not all estrogens are alike. Estrogen types confer benefits and risks based upon their unique pharmacology and route of administration. Of the bioidentical estrogens, 17β-estradiol has greater estrogen receptor affinity relative to estrone and estriol. Transdermal 17β-estradiol administration closely resembles physiologic ovarian estradiol production because its metabolism results in a 1:1 ratio of estradiol to estrone concentrations. Conjugated equine estrogens, the most common form of estrogen therapy in menopausal women, are a biologic estrogen produced from the urine of pregnant mares. Conjugated equine estrogens contain up to ten different estrogens, many of which possess higher affinity than estradiol for the estrogen receptor. The synthetic estrogen ethinyl estradiol differs from 17β-estradiol on the basis of an added ethinyl group at position C-17. As a distinct compound than estradiol, ethinyl estradiol cannot be measured by estradiol assays and has no known bioequivalency to estradiol. Ethinyl estradiol has higher affinity for the estrogen receptor relative to 17β-estradiol. The potency and oral availability of ethinyl estradiol have made it the most widely-used synthetic oral estrogen for contraception. All estrogens, except for transdermal 17β-estradiol, are predominantly metabolized to the less potent, less lipophilic, and therefore less brain-available (Guazzo et al 1996) estrogen, estrone sulfate.

A critical pharmacologic advantage of transdermal estradiol delivery is that it bypasses the enterohepatic circulation. This route of delivery avoids induction of hepatic coagulation factors and triglyceride synthesis and therefore does not appear to increase risk for venothrombolic embolism (Canonico et al 2008). In contrast, orally administered estradiol, ethinyl estradiol, and conjugated equine estrogens have the disadvantage of greater hepatic effects and increased venothrombolic embolism risk (odds ratio of 2-5) (Scarabin et al 2003). Transdermal 17β-estradiol has been advocated as the best available depression treatment in the puerperium and perimenopause because it most closely resembles physiologic ovarian estradiol production, it penetrates the brain the best, and it is not associated with venothromboembolic risk.

What serum concentration of estradiol is therapeutic for PPD?

Estradiol concentrations achieved in transdermal estradiol treatment trials for perimenopause and postpartum depression ranged from 260 – 700 pmol/L, which, like menopausal hormone therapy, simulates mean menstrual cycle concentrations. Notably, such concentrations are 100-fold lower than late third trimester pregnancy estradiol concentrations (60,000 pmol/L) (Tulchinsky et al 1972). Because no correlation between estradiol concentration and depression symptoms was observed in prior studies (Ahokas et al 2001a; Gregoire et al 1996a; Soares et al 2002), we lack evidence that higher estradiol concentrations more effectively treat depression. In addition, whether women with estradiol concentrations in the hypogonadal range (as occurs during lactational amenorrhea) stand to benefit more from estradiol treatment than non-hypogonadal women with PPD is an area of debate than deserves further study (Ahokas et al 2001b; Soares et al 2002).

In general, endogenous estradiol production is curtailed by exogenous estradiol negative feedback on gonadotropins. Therefore, the administered dose of estradiol translates directly into the serum concentration obtained. Pharmacokinetic studies of the Climara® estradiol transdermal system indicated an approximate 1:1 ratio of administered estradiol concentration (in mcg) to serum estradiol concentration (pg/ml) obtained. Converted from picograms per milliliter to picomoles per liter (pmol/L), transdermal estradiol doses from 25 - 200 mcg/day roughly produce serum estradiol concentrations of 90 – 730 pmol/L. Inter- and intra-individual variability in patch application compliance and estradiol absorption and metabolism yields a wide range of serum concentrations per dose administered. For example, among postmenopausal women, 50 mcg estradiol patches changed every 3 days (rather than twice per week (Schmidt et al 2000)) yielded higher serum concentrations than 100 mcg patches changed twice weekly (Soares et al 2001) (Table 1). The 50 mcg estradiol patches changed every 3 days (Schmidt et al 2000) also yielded nearly the same serum concentrations as 200 mcg estradiol patches changed twice weekly in postpartum women (Gregoire et al 1996b) (table 1). Research is needed to determine the lowest transdermal estradiol concentration that is efficacious for the treatment of depression and to examine how inter-individual variability in estradiol metabolism moderates the estradiol dose-treatment response relationship.

Table 1.

Index of estrogen doses and concentrations produced endogenously or administered exogenously, across the lifespan and for depression treatment

Dose Estradiol concentration (pmol/L) Reference
PHYSIOLOGIC CONCENTRATIONS
Prepubertal 40 Adashi text 1996
Menstrual cycle range Ovarian follicle secretes 70 – 500 mcg/d, phase-dependent 180 - 1100 Adashi text 1996
Mean menstrual cycle 370 Adashi text 1996
End first trimester gestation 9,200 Adashi text 1996
End second trimester gestation 37,000 Adashi text 1996
End third trimester gestation 60,000 Adashi text 1996
Lactational amenorrhea 70 Peerhentupa 2004
150 Peerhentupa 2000
152 (n=49) breastfeeding Lawrie 1998
Postpartum – 6 weeks - bottlefeeding 340 (n=9) bottle feeding Lawrie 1998
Hypogonadal/postmenopausal < 110 Adashi text 1996
REPRODUCTIVE ENDOCRINE TREATMENTS
Postmenopausal hormone therapy Estradiol 25 – 200 mcg/d 250 – 600 Physicians' Desk Reference
DEPRESSION TREATMENT
Postmenopausal depression treatment 50 mcg/d (changed q3days) 550 Schmidt 2000
100 mcg/d (changed 2x/wk) 260 Soares 2001
Postpartum depression treatment 200 mcg/d (changed 2x/wk) 680 Gregoire 1996
3-8 mg/d sublingual Mean=500 (range 320-710) Ahokas 2001
HPO AXIS RESEARCH
Lactation, 20-22 wks postpartum Estroderm 50(changed 2x/wk) 100 Perheentupa 2004 (data estimated from graphic)
75 80
100 mcg/d 170
Lactation, 6-1 wks postpartum Estroderm 50(changed 2x/wk) Ranged from 100-200 over 12 wks Perheentupa 2000 (data estimated from graphic)

Side effects and risks of transdermal estradiol

Common side effects of estrogen treatment include nausea, vomiting, bloating, stomach/abdominal cramps, headaches, migraines, changes in vaginal secretions, breast tenderness, episodes of vaginal bleeding and/or spotting, and hair loss. Other side effects include high blood pressure, edema, enlargement of uterine fibroids, and vaginal yeast infection. Oral estrogens are more commonly associated with hypertension and vaginal yeast infections. Transdermal estradiol formulations were well tolerated by postpartum and menopausal women with and without depression (Gregoire et al 1996b; Perheentupa et al 2000; Perheentupa et al 2004; Schmidt et al 2000; Soares et al 2001; von Holst and Salbach 2000).

Transdermal estradiol as dosed within the standard clinical range (≤ 100 mcg/d) does not pose risk for venous thromboembolism (Canonico et al 2008; Scarabin et al 2003). Whether supratherapeutic (>100 mcg/d) doses of transdermal estradiol confer thromboembolism risk is unknown. Doses up to 200 mcg/d have been used for the treatment of PPD without reported thromboembolic events (Gregoire et al 1996b). Medical factors that warrant careful monitoring or withholding of high dose postpartum estradiol treatment include heavy smoking, a past thromboembolic event, thrombophlebitis, hypercoagulability or family history of such, untreated hyperlipidemia, uncontrolled hypertension, arterial vascular disease, heart disease, complicated migraine headaches, obesity (>35% ideal body weight), preeclapmsia, or eclampsia (Brandes 2006; Gillum L 2000).

Estradiol, like other hormones, can act like a carcinogen by increasing cell proliferation in target organs. Increases in cell divisions confer risk for random DNA copying errors and reduce time for repair of DNA damage, thus potentially resulting in the propagation of genetic errors. Endometrial hyperplasia is a condition of endometrial cell proliferation that is commonly related to estrogen use in the absence of a progestin. This estrogen-related simple and nonatypical hyperplasia progresses to endometrial cancer in 1% of cases and is earlier in stage and lower in grade relative to endometrial cancer in non-estrogen users. The risk of endometrial cancer posed by estrogen treatment in postpartum women is extremely low. Protective factors for endometrial hyperplasia in postpartum women include parity (wherein high progesterone production negates estrogen-induced hyperplasia), common use of progestin-containing IUDs or progestin-only oral contraceptives, and lactational amenorrhea-associated hypoestrogenemia. Abnormal uterine bleeding may be a clinical sign of endometrial hyperplasia or cancer and should therefore invoke gynecologic evaluation with possible transvaginal ultrasound and endometrial biopsy (Dubinsky 2004; Espindola et al 2007). Progesterone administration for a minimum of 10 days every 3 months is required to prevent estrogen-related endometrial hyperplasia (Voigt et al 1991). Progestin-releasing intrauterine devices are also highly effective for the prevention of endometrial hyperplasia. In women who develop endometrial hyperplasia, treatment consists of a 21-day course of high dose progestin or endometrial ablation.

Because 75% of breast cancers are estrogen receptor positive, both endogenous and exogenous estrogens can potentiate growth of such cancers. Nevertheless a large study found no increased risk of breast cancer in women with past or present oral contraceptive use, regardless of estrogen dose and duration of use (Marchbanks et al 2002). This finding was also true for a subset of women with a positive first degree family history of breast cancer. Other studies conclude that exogenous estrogen-associated risk of breast cancer is at most 2-3% per year of use or 1-2-fold increased after 5-10 years of use (Prentice et al 2008). More recent evidence suggests that long term, continuous co-administration of the progestin medroxyprogesterone acetate (with estrogen) confers additional risk for breast cancer (2002; Rossouw et al 2002).

Epithelial-type ovarian cancer incidence is not heightened with exposure to reproductive hormones. In fact, parity and oral contraceptive use (clinical variables that suppress ovarian function) are protective factors for ovarian cancer.

Oral contraceptives that contained high dose oral ethinyl estradiol (50 mcg/d) were associated with new onset liver disease (benign hepatic lesions, hemangiomas, biliary stones, and cholestatic jaundice (Eisenfeld and Aten 1987)). In contrast, adverse liver effects are rare for oral estradiol, which has lower affinity for hepatic estrogen receptors relative to ethinyl estradiol, and for transdermal estradiol, which bypasses the enterohepatic circulation.

Breast milk production may be diminished by estrogens if administered prior to well-established lactation, which occurs at 6-8 weeks postpartum. In such situations, the reduction in milk supply is typically rapid (within a week after initiation; D. Bogen, M.D., personal communication) and is characterized by increased infant crying between feeds, less satisfaction after feeding, fewer wet and soiled diapers and weight loss. Discontinuation of the exogenous estrogen treatment can often restore milk production. Extant data reveal negligible passage of estradiol into breast milk for doses up to 100 mcg/d (Perheentupa et al 2004).

Transdermal estradiol has not been widely tested nor has it been approved as a contraceptive. Investigators have demonstrated that transdermal estradiol 50-100 mcg/day treatment suppressed ovarian folliculogenesis and pituitary secretion of FSH and LH (Perheentupa et al. 2000; Perheentupa et al. 2004); however, additional study is warranted in larger samples and in non-lactating women.

Selection of a progestogen to be used in concert with transdermal estradiol for PPD treatment

The administration of estradiol necessitates co-administration of a progestogen, which induces secretory transformation and shedding of the endometrial lining to protect against endometrial hyperplasia and cancer. Commonly used progestogens have oral, subcutaneous, or intra-uterine administration. Intra-uterine administration results in lower systemic progestogen absorption and thus potentially fewer side effects. Oral progestogens can be administered continuously or sequentially (every 3 months).

Similar to estrogens, not all progestogens are the same. The progestogen class is comprised of diverse members that have in common the ability to induce secretory changes in the endometrium. Progesterone is the bioidentical hormone and dydrogesterone is the compound most like progesterone. The highly potent pregnane progestogens (ie: medroxyprogesterone acetate, megestrol and cyproteron acetate) are synthetic derivatives of progesterone with modifications at the C-17 and C-6 sites. The synthetic 19-nortestosterone-derived group of progestogens are derived from testosterone and include norethisterone, norgestrel, and desogestrel. The synthetic progestogens have come into widespread use due to ease of oral administration, ability to be prepared in parenteral, long-acting and depot formulations, and high progesterone receptor potency.

What are the risks of progestin treatment?

The mineralocorticoid activity of the progestogens is responsible for associated weight gain, bloating, and edema side effects. These effects are minimized with the anti-mineralocorticoid progestogen drospirenone. The 19-nortestosterone group possesses dermatologic side effects typical of androgens, including acne, greasy skin, and darkening of facial hair. These androgenic progestogens may also confer adverse metabolic effects including lowering of HDL and decreased insulin sensitivity (Panay and Studd 1997). The pregnane and norpregnane derivatives are considered to have more intermediate effects on cardiovascular metabolic risk factors. The pregnane medroxyprogesterone acetate has been associated with vasospasm risk (Paris et al 2000) and warrants additional study. Progesterone and dydrogesterone have the fewest associated adverse metabolic, vascular, and dermatologic effects relative to other progestogens.

Progestogen effects on mental health are variable. Endogenous progesterone metabolites (ie: allopregnanolone) are potent agonists of the GABA-A receptor and thereby reduce anxiety and positively modulate mood (Uzunova et al 2006). Synthetic progestin components of hormonal contraceptives and hormone therapy have been alternatively associated with increased (Elovainio et al 2007; Kulkarni 2007; Lawrie et al 1998; Pazol et al 2004) or decreased risk for depression (Cagnacci et al 2004; Dalton 1985; Dalton 1989; Dalton 1995; Gupta et al 2001; Joffe et al 2003; Pazol et al 2004; Westhoff et al 1998a; Westhoff et al 1998b; Young et al 2007). In a randomized clinical trial of postpartum healthy women assigned to the injectable progestin norethisterone enanthate (which is closely related to the progestin-only oral contraceptive commonly prescribed to lactating women) or placebo within 48 hours post delivery, depression scores were higher in the progestin group at six weeks postpartum (Lawrie et al 1998). Progesterone itself, in contrast, has shown promise in the prophylaxis and/or treatment of postpartum depression in several open studies (Dalton 1985; Dalton 1989; Dalton 1995), and might be a preferred progestin for women with mood worsening during treatment with synthetic progestins. The levonorgestrel containing intra-uterine device (Mirena©) is an increasingly used contraceptive in postpartum women because of its low systemic absorption, convenience, tolerability, and cost-effectiveness. Continued study of cardiovascular and mental health effects of progestin compounds is needed.

Breastmilk production may be diminished by progestins if administered prior to well-established lactation. Intramuscular medroxyprogesterone acetate treatment of mothers resulted in low breast milk concentrations (1 mcg/L) and nondetectability in infant urine samples (Hale 2002). Because medroxyprogesterone acetate is less bioavailable when given orally, even lower breast milk accumulation and passage to infants would be expected.

Conclusions

A convergence of epidemiological, preclinical, and clinical research suggests the utility of transdermal estradiol for the treatment of PPD. Robust and rapid response to estradiol in two clinical PPD trials, few side effects, and minimal breastmilk passage to the infant make estradiol a promising PPD treatment. Estradiol cannot be considered as a first line agent among conventional antidepressant treatments for acute treatment of PPD until additional efficacy data are available. Additional safety data are also needed before estradiol can be considered as a treatment option for women who do not respond to or decline conventional treatments or who wish to use estradiol as an adjunct to conventional antidepressants. Outcomes related to maternal tolerability of cyclic progestins, long-term safety of high dose estradiol treatment, and high dose estradiol passage into breastmilk and infants are of particular interest. The utility of continuation and maintenance treatment with estradiol has not been investigated with respect to PPD and warrants study.

Lack of robust efficacy data of estradiol as a therapeutic for PPD has been the main obstacle for its clinical use. Studies to obtain this efficacy data in PPD have been challenged by the nonavailability of masked estradiol patches for use in RCTs. The Women's Health Initiative study also raised concerns about estrogen and progesterone-associated health risks that have discouraged additional study; however, such risks are minimal in young, reproductive aged women. Another obstacle is the concern that estradiol could interfere with breastmilk production, given the public health emphasis to increase lactation rates. A major obstacle is that estradiol treatment traditionally falls within the purview of obstetrics-gynecology, while depression traditionally falls with the purview of psychiatry. Isolation of psychiatrists from obstetrical practitioners make each clinician unfamiliar, inexperienced, and unwilling to assume full responsibility for estradiol treatment of PPD. As interdisciplinary practice of medicine grows (Katon and Unutzer 2006), models of interdisciplinary collaboration, such as colocation of Gynecology-Psychiatry clinics, will be poised to increase the application of hormonal treatments for mood disorders and benefit the mental health of postpartum women.

Acknowledgments

Dr. Moses-Kolko's contribution to this work was supported by National Institute of Mental Health K23 MH64561, R01 MH079164 and R01 MH057102 (K. Wisner, PI). Dr. Berga's efforts related to this work were supported primarily by NIH R01 MH079164 (E. Moses-Kolko, PI). Dr. Kalro's contributions were supported by National Institute of Mental Health R01 MH057102 (K. Wisner, PI). Dr. Sit's contributions were supported by National Institute of Mental Health R01 MH60335 (K. Wisner, PI) and the Junior Faculty Scholars Program, and National Institute of Mental Health R25 MH060473 (P. Pilkonis, PI). Dr. Wisner's effort was supported primarily by National Institute of Mental Health R01 MH057102.

Footnotes

1

Dydrogesterone (9B, 10α-pregna-4, 6-diene-3, 20-dione) is an orally active progestogen with a molecular structure almost identical to that of natural progesterone.

Financial Disclosures: Dr. Wisner has received grant support from Pfizer and is currently on the speaker's bureau of Glaxo-Smith-Kline. Dr. Berga has served intermittently in an advisory capacity to the following companies that manufacture menopause hormone replacement and contraceptive products: Bayer Schering Pharma, Upsher-Smith Laboratories, Inc., Wyeth, Pfizer, and Novogyne Pharmaceuticals. She has received grant support from Pfizer and has lectured on menopause hormone therapy on behalf of Novogyne Pharmaceuticals and Upsher-Smith Laboratories, Inc. Dr. Berga has also received grant support from Pfizer. Drs. Wisner, Moses-Kolko, Sit, and Kalro are conducting a trial of transdermal estradiol for postpartum depression with the donation of placebo patches from Novogyne Pharmaceuticals, a joint venture between Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation and Noven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Dr. Moses-Kolko also receives NIMH and NARSAD Foundation support. Dr. Wisner has also received grant support from: National Institute of Mental Health (SBIR #043), Stanley Medical Research Foundation, the State of Pennsylvania, and the Heinz Foundation. Dr. Sit also received support through an International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) Fellowship Award.

Contributor Information

Eydie L. Moses-Kolko, Women's Behavioral HealthCARE, Department of Psychiatry, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 3811 O'Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, Tel: 412 246 5346; Fax: 412 246 6960; mosesEL@upmc.edu.

Sarah L. Berga, Emory University School of Medicine, 1639 Pierce Drive, Rm#4208-WMB, Atlanta, GA 30322, Tel: 404 727 8600; sberga@emory.edu.

Brinda Kalro, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Magee-Womens Hospital, 100 Halket Street; Pittsburgh, PA 15213, Tel: 412 641-6451; bkalro@upmc.edu.

Dorothy K.Y. Sit, Women's Behavioral HealthCARE, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 3811 O'Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, Tel: 412 246 5248; sitdk@upmc.edu.

Katherine L. Wisner, Epidemiology, and Women's Studies, Women's Behavioral HealthCARE, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 3811 O'Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, Tel: 412 246 6564; wisnerkl@upmc.edu.

References

  1. Ahokas A, Kaukoranta J, Wahlbeck K, Aito M. Estrogen deficiency in severe postpartum depression: successful treatment with sublingual physiologic 17beta-estradiol: a preliminary study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2001a;62:332–336. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v62n0504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahokas A, Kaukoranta J, Wahlbeck K, Aito M. Estrogen Deficiency in Severe Postpartum Depression: Successful Treatment With Sublingual Physiological 17B-Estradiol: A Preliminary Study. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2001b;62:332–336. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v62n0504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Amantea D, Russo R, Bagetta G, Corasaniti MT. From clinical evidence to molecular mechanisms underlying neuroprotection afforded by estrogens. Pharmacological Research. 2005;52:119–132. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2005.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Appleby L, Warner R, Whitton A, Faragher B. A controlled study of fluoxetone and cognitive-behavioral counselling in the treatment of postnatal depression. BMJ. 1997;314:932–936. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7085.932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Berman KF, Schmidt PJ, Rubinow DR, Danaceau MA, Van Horn JD, Esposito G, et al. Modulation of cognition-specific cortical activity by gonadal steroids: a positron-emission tomography study in women. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1997;94:8836–8841. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.16.8836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bethea CL, Mirkes SJ, Shively CA, Adams MR. Steroid regulation of tryptophan hydroxylase protein in the dorsal raphe of macaques. Biological Psychiatry. 2000;47:562–576. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(99)00156-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bloch M, Schmidt P, Danaceau M, Murphy J, Neiman L, Rubinow D. Effects of gonadal steroids in women with a history of postpartum depression. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2000;157:924–930. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.6.924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brandes J. The Influence of Estrogen on Migraine. JAMA. 2006;295:1824–1830. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.15.1824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cagnacci A, Arangino S, Baldassari F, Alessandrini C, Landi S, Volpe A. A comparison of the central effects of different progestins unsed in hormone replacement therapy. Maturitas. 2004;48:456–462. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2003.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Canonico M, Plu-Bureau G, Lowe GD, Scarabin PY. Hormone replacement therapy and risk of venous thromboembolism in postmenopausal women: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2008;336:1227–1231. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39555.441944.BE. see comment. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cizza G, Gold PW, Chrousos GP. High-dose transdermal estrogen, corticotropin-releasing hormone, and postnatal depression. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997;82:704. doi: 10.1210/jc.82.2.703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cohen L, Soares C, Vitonis A, Otto M, Harlow B. Risk for new onset of depression during the menopausal transition. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63:385–389. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.4.385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cox J, Holden J, Sagovsky R. Detection of postnatal depression: Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. British Journal of Psychiatry. 1987;150:782–786. doi: 10.1192/bjp.150.6.782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dalton K. Progesterone prophylaxis used successfully in postnatal depression. Practitioner. 1985;229:507–508. [Google Scholar]
  15. Dalton K. Successful prophylactic progesterone for idiopathic postnatal depression. International journal of prenatal perinatal studies. 1989;1:322–327. [Google Scholar]
  16. Dalton K. Progesterone prophylaxis for postnatal depression. International journal of prenatal perinatal psychology. 1995;7:447–450. [Google Scholar]
  17. de Mello MF, de Jesus Mari J, Bacaltchuk J, Verdeli H, Neugebauer R. A systematic review of research findings on the efficacy of interpersonal therapy for depressive disorders. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2005;255:75–82. doi: 10.1007/s00406-004-0542-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dreher JC, Schmidt PJ, Kohn P, Furman D, Rubinow DR, Berman KF. Menstrual cycle phase modulates reward-related neural function in women. PNAS. 2007;104:2465–2470. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605569104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Dubinsky TJ. Value of sonography in the diagnosis of abnormal vaginal bleeding. J Clin Ultrasound. 2004;32:348–353. doi: 10.1002/jcu.20049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Duman RS, Heninger GR, Nestler EJ. A molecular and cellular theory of depression. Arch Gen Psych. 1997;54:597–606. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1997.01830190015002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Eisenfeld AJ, Aten RF. Estrogen receptors and androgen receptors in the mammalian liver. J Steroid Biochem. 1987;27:1109–1118. doi: 10.1016/0022-4731(87)90197-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Elovainio M, Teperi J, Aalto AM, Grenman S, Kivela A, Kujansuu E, et al. Depressive symptoms as predictors of discontinuation of treatment of menorrhagia by levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. Int J Behav Med. 2007;14:70–75. doi: 10.1007/BF03004171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. England R. Infant development and management of infant problems in a family setting. Australian Family Physician. 1994;23:1877–1882. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Espindola D, Kennedy KA, Fischer EG. Management of abnormal uterine bleeding and the pathology of endometrial hyperplasia. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2007;34:717–737. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2007.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Freeman E, Sammel M, Lin H, Nelson D. Associations of hormones and menopausal status with depressed mood in women with no history of depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63:375–381. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.4.375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Freeman EW, Sammel MD, Rinaudo PJ, Sheng L. Premenstrual syndrome as a predictor of menopausal symptoms. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2004;103:960–966. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000124804.81095.7f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Gaynes BN, Gavin N, Meltzer-Brody S, Lohr KN, Swinson T, Gartlehner G, et al. Perinatal Depression: Prevalence, Screening Accuracy, and Screening Outcomes. Evid Rep Technol Assess. 2005;119:1–8. doi: 10.1037/e439372005-001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Gibbs RB, Aggarwal P. Estrogen and Basal Forebrain cholinergic Neurons: Implications for Brain Aging and Alzheimer's Disease-Related Cognitive Decline. Hormones and Behavior. 1998;34:98–111. doi: 10.1006/hbeh.1998.1451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Gillum L, M S, Johnston S. Ischemic stroke risk with oral contraceptives. JAMA. 2000;284:72–78. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.1.72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Grace SL, Evindar A, Stewart DE. The effect of postpartum depression on child cognitive development and behavior: a review and critical analysis of the literature. Archives of Women's Mental Health. 2003;6:263–274. doi: 10.1007/s00737-003-0024-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Gregoire AJ, Kumar R, Everitt B, et al. Transdermal oestrogen for treatment of severe postnatal depression. Lancet. 1996a;347:930–933. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)91414-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Gregoire AJ, Kumar R, Everitt B, Henderson AF, Studd JW. Transdermal oestrogen for treatment of severe postnatal depression. Lancet. 1996b;347:930–933. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)91414-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Guazzo EP, Kirkpatrick PJ, Goodyer IM, Shiers HM, Herbert J. Cortisol, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), and DHEA sulfate in the cerebrospinal fluid of man: relation to blood levels and the effects of age. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996;81:3951–3960. doi: 10.1210/jcem.81.11.8923843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Gundlah C, Kohama SG, Mirkes SJ, Garyfallou VT, Urbanski HF, Bethea CL. Distribution of estrogen receptor beta (ERbeta) mRNA in hypothalamus, midbrain and temporal lobe of spayed macaque: continued expression with hormone replacement. Brain Research Molecular Brain Research. 2000;76:191–204. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(99)02475-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Gupta N, O'Brien R, Jacobsen LJ, Davis A, Zuckerman A, Supran S, et al. Mood changes in adolescents using depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception: a prospective study. Journal of Pediatric & Adolescent Gynecology. 2001;14:71–76. doi: 10.1016/s1083-3188(01)00074-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Hale TW. Medications and Mothers' Milk. 10. Amarillo: Pharmasoft Publishing; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  37. Hanusa BH, Scholle SH, Haskett RF, Spadaro K, Wisner KL. Screening for depression in the postpartum period: a comparison of three instruments. Journal of Women's Health. 2008;17:585–596. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2006.0248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Hendrick V, Altshuler L, Strouse T, Grosser S. Postpartum and nonpostpartum depression: differences in presentation and response to pharmacologic treatment. Depression and Anxiety. 2000;11:66–72. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6394(2000)11:2<66::aid-da3>3.0.co;2-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Hobfoll SE, Ritter C, Lavin J, Hulsizer MR, Cameron RP. Depression prevalence and incidence among inner-city pregnant and postpartum women. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology. 1995;63:445–453. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.63.3.445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Joffe H, Cohen LS, Harlow BL. Impact of oral contraceptive pill use on premenstrual mood: predictors of improvement and deterioration. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2003;189:1523–1530. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(03)00927-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Katon W, Unutzer J. Collaborative care models for depression: time to move from evidence to practice. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2006;166:2304–2306. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.21.2304. comment. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Kelly CM, Jorm AF. Stigma and mood disorders. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2007;20:13–16. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e3280113cf5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Kendler KS, Neale MC, Kessler RC, Heath AC, Eaves LJ. The lifetime history of major depression in women. Reliability of diagnosis and heritability. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1993;50:863–870. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820230054003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Kessler RC. Gender differences in major depression: Epidemiological findings. In: Frank E, editor. Gender and its effects on psychopathology. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  45. Kessler RC, Merikangas KR, Wang PS. Prevalence, comorbidity, and service utilization for mood disorders in the United States at the beginning of the twenty-first century. Annu. 2007;3:137–158. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Kulkarni J. Depression as a side effect of the contraceptive pill. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2007;6:371–374. doi: 10.1517/14740338.6.4.371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Lawrie TA, Hofmeyr GJ, DeJager M, Berk M, Paiker J, Viljoen E. A double-blind randomised placebo controlled trial of postnatal norethisterone enanthate: the effect on postnatal depression and serum hormones. British J Obst Gyn. 1998;105:1082–1090. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb09940.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Lee SJ, McEwen BS. Neurotrophic and Neuroprotective Actions of Estrogens and Their Therapeutic Implications. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology. 2001;41:569–591. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.41.1.569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Lindahl V, Pearson JL, Colpe L. Prevalence of suicidality during pregnancy and the postpartum. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2005;8:77–87. doi: 10.1007/s00737-005-0080-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Manji HK, Drevets WC, Charney DS. The cellular neurobiology of depression. Nature Medicine. 2001;7:541–547. doi: 10.1038/87865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Marchbanks PA, McDonald JA, Wilson HG, Folger SG, Mandel MG, Daling JR, et al. Oral contraceptives and the risk of breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. 2002;346:2025–2032. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa013202. see comment. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. McEwen BS, Alves SE. Estrogen Actions in the central Nervous System. Endocrine Review. 1999;20:279–307. doi: 10.1210/edrv.20.3.0365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Munk-Olsen T, Laursen TM, Pedersen CB, Mors O, Mortensen PB. New parents and mental disorders: a population-based register study. JAMA. 2006;296:2582–2589. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.21.2582. see comment. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Murray L, Cooper PJ. Postpartum depression and child development. Psychological Medicine. 1997;27:253–260. doi: 10.1017/s0033291796004564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. O'Hara MW, Stuart S, Gorman LL, Wenzel A. Efficacy of interpersonal psychotherapy for postpartum depression. Archives of General Psychiatry. 2000;57:1039–1045. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.57.11.1039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Okun ML, Hanusa BH, Hall M, Wisner KL. Sleep complaints in late pregnancy and the recurrence of postpartum depression. doi: 10.1080/15402000902762394. In press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Osterlund MK, Halldin C, Hurd YL. Effects of Chronic 17B-Estradiol treatment on the serotonin 5-HT1A receptor mRNA and Binding Levels in the Rat Brain. Synapse. 2000;35:39–44. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2396(200001)35:1<39::AID-SYN5>3.0.CO;2-T. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Panay N, Studd J. Progestogen intolerance and compliance with hormone replacement therapy in menopausal women. Human Reproduction Update. 1997;3:159–171. doi: 10.1093/humupd/3.2.159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Paris JM, Williams KJ, Hermsmeyer KR, Delansorne R. Nomegestrol acetate and vascular reactivity: nonhuman primate experiments. Steroids. 2000;65:621–627. doi: 10.1016/s0039-128x(00)00118-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Parry BL. Mood Disorders Linked to the Reproductive Cycle in Women. In: Bloom FE, Kupfer DJ, editors. Psychopharmacology: The Fourth Generation of Progress. Vol. 88. New York: Raven Press Ltd.; 1995. pp. 1029–1042. [Google Scholar]
  61. Payne JL, Roy PS, Murphy-Eberenz K, Weismann MM, Swartz KL, McInnis MG, et al. Reproductive cycle-associated mood symptoms in women with major depression and bipolar disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2007;99:221–229. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2006.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Pazol K, Wilson ME, Wallen K. Medroxyprogesterone acetate antagonizes the effects of estrogen treatment on social and sexual behavior in female macaques. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2004;89:2998–3006. doi: 10.1210/jc.2003-032086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Pecins-Thompson M, Bethea CL. Ovarian steroid regulation of serotonin-1A autoreceptor messenger RNA expression in the dorsal raphe of rhesus macaques. Neuroscience. 1999;89:267–277. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(98)00326-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Peindl K, Wisner K, Hanusa B. Identifying depression in the first postpartum year: Guidelines for office-based screening and referral. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2004 doi: 10.1016/S0165-0327(03)00052-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Perheentupa A, Critchley HO, Illingworth PJ, McNeilly AS. Enhanced sensitivity to steroid-negative feedback during breast-feeding: low-dose estradiol (transdermal estradiol supplementation) suppresses gonadotropins and ovarian activity assessed by inhibin B. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2000;85:4280–4286. doi: 10.1210/jcem.85.11.6997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Perheentupa A, Ruokonen A, Tapanainen JS. Transdermal estradiol treatment suppresses serum gonadotropins during lactation without transfer into breast milk. Fertility & Sterility. 2004;82:903–907. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.02.141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Prentice RL, Chlebowski RT, Stefanick ML, Manson JE, Pettinger M, Hendrix SL, et al. Estrogen plus progestin therapy and breast cancer in recently postmenopausal women. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2008;167:1207–1216. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, LaCroix AZ, Kooperberg C, Stefanick ML, et al. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results From the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trial.[see comment] JAMA. 2002;288:321–333. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.3.321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Rubinow DR, S PJ. Gonadal steroid regulation of mood: The lessons of premenstrual syndrome. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology. 2006;27:210–216. doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2006.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Sanjuan JMDP, Martin-Santos RMDP, Garcia-Esteve LMDP, Carot JMPP, Guillamat RMDP, Gutierrez-Zotes AP, et al. Mood changes after delivery: role of the serotonin transporter gene. British Journal of Psychiatry. 2008;193:383–388. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.045427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Scarabin P, Oger E, Plu-Bureau G. Differential association of oral and transdermal oestrogen-replacement therapy with venous thromboemboliam risk. The Lancet. 2003;362:428–432. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14066-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Schmidt PJ, Nieman L, Danaceau MA, Tobin MB, Roca CA, Murphy JH, et al. Estrogen replacement in perimenopause-related depression: A preliminary report. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2000;183:414–420. doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.106004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Schmidt PJ, Nieman LK, Danaceau MA, Adams LF, Rubinow DR. Differential behavioral effects of gonadal steroids in women with and in those without premestrual syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:209–216. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199801223380401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Soares CN, Almeida OP, Joffe H, Cohen LS. Efficacy of estradiol for the treatment of depressive disorders in perimenopausal women: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;58:529–534. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.58.6.529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Soares CN, Joffe H, Cohen LS, Almeida OP. Efficacy of 17beta-estradiol on depression: is estrogen deficiency really necessary? J Clin Psych. 2002;63:451. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v63n0513a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Trad PV. Mental Health of Adolescent Mothers. J Am Acad Child and Adolesc Psychiatry. 1995;34:130–142. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199502000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Trivedi MH, Rush AJ, Wisniewski SR, Nierenberg AA, Warden D, Ritz L, et al. Evaluation of outcomes with citalopram for depression using measurement-based care in STAR*D: implications for clinical practice. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2006;163:28–40. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.1.28. see comment. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Tulchinsky D, Hobel CJ, Yeager E, Marshall JR. Plasma estrone, estradiol, estriol, progesterone, and 17-hydroxyprogesterone in human pregnancy. I. Normal pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1972;112:1095–1100. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(72)90185-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Uzunova V, Sampson L, Uzunov DP. Relevance of endogenous 3alpha-reduced neurosteroids to depression and antidepressant action. Psychopharmacology. 2006;186:351–361. doi: 10.1007/s00213-005-0201-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Voigt LF, Weiss NS, Chu J, JR D, McKnight B, van Belle G. Progestagen supplementation of exoggenous oestrogens and risk of endometrial cancer. Lancet. 1991;338:274–277. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)90417-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. von Holst T, Salbach B. Efficacy and tolerability of a new 7-day transdermal estradiol patch versus placebo in hysterectomized women with postmenopausal complaints. Maturitas. 2000;34:143–153. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5122(99)00099-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Walsh BT, Seidman SN, Sysko R, Gould M. Placebo response in studies of major depression: variable, substantial, and growing.[see comment] JAMA. 2002;287:1840–1847. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.14.1840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Weissman A, Levy B, Hartz A, Bentler S, Donohue M, Ellingrod V, et al. Pooled analysis of antidepressant levels in lactating mothers, breast milk, and nursing infants. Am J Psych. 2004;161:1066–1078. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.6.1066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Westhoff C, Truman C, Kalmuss D, Cushman L, Davidson A, Rulin M, et al. Depressive symptoms and Depo-Provera. Contraception. 1998a;57:237–240. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(98)00024-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Westhoff C, Truman C, Kalmuss D, Cushman L, Rulin M, Heartwell S, et al. Depressive symptoms and Norplant contraceptive implants. Contraception. 1998b;57:241–245. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(98)00022-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Wisner K, Peindl K, Gigliotti T, Hanusa B. Obsessions and compulsions in women with postpartum depression. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 1999;60:176–180. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v60n0305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Wisner KL, Chambers C, Sit DKY. Postpartum depression: a major public health problem. JAMA. 2006a;296:2616–2618. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.21.2616. comment. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Wisner KL, Hanusa BH, Perel JM, Peindl KS, Piontek CM, Sit DKY, et al. Postpartum Depression: A randomized trial of Sertraline vs. Nortriptyline. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology. 2006b;26:353–360. doi: 10.1097/01.jcp.0000227706.56870.dd. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Writing Group for the Women's Health Initiative Investigators. Risks and Benefits of Estrogen Plus Progestin in Healthy Postmenopausal Women. JAMA. 2002;288:321–333. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.3.321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Young EA, Kornstein SG, Harvey AT, Wisniewski SR, Barkin J, Fava M, et al. Influences of hormone-based contraception on depressive symptoms in premenopausal women with major depression. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2007;32:843–853. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2007.05.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES