Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1963 Sep;86(3):505–509. doi: 10.1128/jb.86.3.505-509.1963

PRODUCTION OF DELAYED HYPERSENSITIVITY TO CRYPTOCOCCUS NEOFORMANS IN EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS

Rachel Lomanitz 1, John M Hale 1
PMCID: PMC278464  PMID: 14066429

Abstract

Lomanitz, Rachel (University of Oklahoma School of Medicine, Oklahoma City) and John M. Hale. Production of delayed hypersensitivity to Cryptococcus neoformans in experimental animals. J. Bacteriol. 86:505–509. 1963.—Rabbits and guinea pigs have been sensitized to somatic, as well as whole-cell, antigens of a small-capsuled variant of Cryptococcus neoformans ODH-DV. Rabbits have also been sensitized to soma and to whole cells of a large-capsuled patient isolate. The time required for appearance of skin reactivity, after intracutaneous injection of antigenic material, indicated that the hypersensitivity developed was of the delayed type. This was subsequently demonstrated in both rabbits and guinea pigs by passive transfer of the hypersensitivity to normal animals. Efforts to transfer the skin sensitivity to normal rabbits with serum from sensitized animals were unsuccessful, indicating that humoral antibodies are not involved. Preliminary studies suggest that the sensitizing antigen resides in the cell wall and is highly specific.

Full text

PDF
505

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ABRAHAMS I., GILLERAN T. G., WEISS C. B. Quantitative studies on reverse cutaneous anaphylaxis in mice with progressive cryptococcosis. J Immunol. 1962 Nov;89:684–690. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. GADEBUSCH H. H. Active immunization against Cryptococcus neoformans. J Infect Dis. 1958 May-Jun;102(3):219–226. doi: 10.1093/infdis/102.3.219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. GADEBUSCH H. H. Passive immunization against Cryptococcus neoformans. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1958 Jul;98(3):611–614. doi: 10.3181/00379727-98-24123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. GADEBUSCH H. H. Specific degradation of Cryptococcus neoformans 3723 capsular polysaccharide by a microbial enzyme. III. Antibody stimulation by partially decapsulated cells. J Infect Dis. 1960 Nov-Dec;107:406–409. doi: 10.1093/infdis/107.3.406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. GEORGE M., VAUGHAN J. H. In vitro cell migration as a model for delayed hypersensitivity. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1962 Nov;111:514–521. doi: 10.3181/00379727-111-27841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. SALVIN S. B., SMITH R. F. An antigen for detection of hypersensitivity to Cryptococcus neoformans. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1961 Nov;108:498–501. doi: 10.3181/00379727-108-26977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES