Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1963 Oct;86(4):702–707. doi: 10.1128/jb.86.4.702-707.1963

SURVEY OF THE BACTERIOCINES OF ENTEROCOCCI

Thomas D Brock a,1, Barbara Peacher a, Deborah Pierson a,2
PMCID: PMC278504  PMID: 14066464

Abstract

Brock, Thomas D. (Indiana University, Bloomington), Barbara Peacher, and Deborah Pierson. A survey of the bacteriocines of enterococci. J. Bacteriol. 86:702–707. 1963.—A survey has been made of bacteriocine production by a wide variety of well-characterized strains of group D streptococci. On the basis of spectrums and sensitivity to chloroform, heat, and proteolytic enzymes, five distinct bacteriocines can be defined. Type 1 is produced by all Streptococcus zymogenes (S. faecalis var. zymogenes) strains, is active against a wide variety of gram-positive bacteria, and is also a hemolysin. Type 2 is produced by some S. liquefaciens (S. faecalis var. liquefaciens) strains, and acts on many enterococci as well as on certain other lactic acid bacteria. Type 3 is produced by certain strains of both S. faecalis and S. faecium, and inhibits a wide variety of group D streptococci, but is inactive against all other lactic acid bacteria tested except Leuconostoc citrovorum. Type 4 is produced by certain S. faecium strains and resembles in certain ways the type 3 activity, but differs from it in other ways. Type 5 has been found to be produced by only one proteolytic strain of S. zymogenes, and this bacteriocine has a very narrow spectrum. The strain that produces this bacteriocine also produces type 1 activity. No strain is sensitive to a bacteriocine of the type it produces.

Full text

PDF
702

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BARNES E. M. Tetrazolium reduction as a means of differentiating Streptococcus faecalis from Streptococcus faecium. J Gen Microbiol. 1956 Feb;14(1):57–68. doi: 10.1099/00221287-14-1-57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. DE KLERK H. C., COETZEE J. N. Antibiosis among lactobacilli. Nature. 1961 Oct 28;192:340–341. doi: 10.1038/192340a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. FREDERICQ P. Colicins. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1957;11:7–22. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.11.100157.000255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ivanovics G. BACTERIOCINS AND BACTERIOCIN-LIKE SUBSTANCES. Bacteriol Rev. 1962 Jun;26(2 Pt 1):108–118. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. KJEMS E. Studies on streptococcal bacteriophages. I. Technique of isolating phage-producing strains. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1955;36(5):433–440. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. SHARPE M. E., SHATTOCK P. M. F. The serological typing of group D streptococci associated with outbreaks of neonatal diarrhoea. J Gen Microbiol. 1952 Feb;6(1-2):150–165. doi: 10.1099/00221287-6-1-2-150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. SHATTOCK P. M. F. The identification and classification of Streptococcus faecalis and some associated streptococci. Ann Inst Pasteur Lille. 1955;7:95–100. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES