Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1963 Oct;86(4):749–756. doi: 10.1128/jb.86.4.749-756.1963

EFFECT OF ETHAMBUTOL ON CYTOLOGY OF MYCOBACTERIUM SMEGMATIS

Glen R Gale 1, Helen H McLain 1
PMCID: PMC278511  PMID: 14066471

Abstract

Gale, Glen R. (Veterans Administration Hospital, Durham, N.C.) and Helen H. McLain. Effect of ethambutol on cytology of Mycobacterium smegmatis. J. Bacteriol. 86:749–756. 1963.—Electron microscopy showed the effects of the antimycobacterial drug, ethambutol [d-2,2′-(ethylenediimino)-di-1-butanol], on the cytology of Mycobacterium smegmatis. After 10 hr of exposure to the drug, cells no longer contained material which, in control cells, was closely associated with cellular division, possibly genetic substance. No marked changes were observed in other cellular structures. It was concluded that the drug may block one or more steps in the synthesis of pentose nucleic acid or deoxypentose nucleic acid, ultimately causing cessation of cellular division and loss of viability. These cytological findings were compatible with results of other investigators on the mode of action of this drug.

Full text

PDF
749

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. CHAPMAN G. B. Cytological aspects of antimicrobial antibiosis. I. Cytological changes associated with the exposure of Escherichia coli to colistin sulfate. J Bacteriol. 1962 Jul;84:169–179. doi: 10.1002/path.1700840118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. CHAPMAN G. B. Electron microscopy of ultrathin sections of bacteria. III. Cell wall, cytoplasmic membrane, and nuclear material. J Bacteriol. 1959 Jul;78(1):96–104. doi: 10.1128/jb.78.1.96-104.1959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. FORBES M., KUCK N. A., PEETS E. A. Mode of action of ethambutol. J Bacteriol. 1962 Nov;84:1099–1103. doi: 10.1128/jb.84.5.1099-1103.1962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. KELLENBERGER E., RYTER A., SECHAUD J. Electron microscope study of DNA-containing plasms. II. Vegetative and mature phage DNA as compared with normal bacterial nucleoids in different physiological states. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1958 Nov 25;4(6):671–678. doi: 10.1083/jcb.4.6.671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. KOIKE M., TAKEYA K. Fine structures of intracytoplasmic organelles of mycobacteria. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1961 Mar;9:597–608. doi: 10.1083/jcb.9.3.597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. MURRAY R. G., FRANCOMBE W. H., MAYALL B. H. The effect of penicillin on the structure of staphylococcal cell walls. Can J Microbiol. 1959 Dec;5:641–648. doi: 10.1139/m59-078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. THOMAS J. P., BAUGHN C. O., WILKINSON R. G., SHEPHERD R. G. A new synthetic compound with antituberculous activity in mice: ethambutol (dextro-2,2'-(ethylenediimino)-di-l-butanol). Am Rev Respir Dis. 1961 Jun;83:891–893. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1961.83.6.891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES