Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008 Dec;1148:1–28. doi: 10.1196/annals.1410.082

Identifying the Stress Transcriptome in the Adrenal Medulla Following Acute and Repeated Immobilization

Xiaoping Liu 1, Lidia Serova 1, Richard Kvetnansky 2, Esther L Sabban 1
PMCID: PMC2785127  NIHMSID: NIHMS66493  PMID: 19120088

Abstract

Stress triggers changes in gene expression mediating important adaptive and maladaptive responses. The full repertoire of genes whose expression in the adrenal medulla is altered by stress has not been previously determined. In this study, gene profiling (RAE 230 2.0 Affymetrix) was applied to elucidate global changes in gene expression in adrenal medulla of rats exposed to 2-hour immobilization stress (IMO) once or repeatedly for six consecutive days. The number of transcripts significantly (p<0.01) altered with single IMO (651 up, 487 down) was more than with repeated IMO (370 up- 195 down). The annotated transcripts were further analyzed and categorized. The largest numbers of changes were in mRNA levels in the transcription factor and cell signaling categories. Robust changes were also observed in transcripts related to growth factors, apoptosis, neurosecretion/neuropeptides, heat shock proteins, structural proteins, chemokines, cytokines, metabolism/lipid-metabolism, and proteases. Many (>80%) were uniquely induced by single IMO. About half of transcripts changed by repeated IMO were also responsive to single IMO. Pathway analysis was applied to identify direct interactions and common targets among gene products altered by single and repeated IMO. In this paper, we briefly describe the most pronounced changes observed with emphasis on those which may provide new insight into the common and distinct mechanisms whereby the adrenal medulla responses to a first encounter with stress compared to repeated exposure to the same stressor.

Keywords: stress, adrenal medulla, microarray, gene profiling

Introduction

The adrenal medulla plays a key role in the response to stress. Release of epinephrine (Epi) and norepinephrine (NE) from adrenal medulla is among the most rapid responses to stress. Epi and NE are critical in transmitting the perceived threat into action by activating the heart and muscles to prepare for the ‘fight or flight’ response1. This stimulates glycogen breakdown in muscle and liver, gluconeogenesis in the liver, and lipolysis in adipose tissue. It also inhibits insulin release while stimulating glucagons secretion, triggers vasoconstriction and enhances cardiac output [reviewed in2]. Moreover, Epi is key for memory of emotionally charged events3,4; sympathetic activation and elevated urinary NE and/or Epi concentration are consistently observed in patients with PTSD5,6.

One of the most important questions in stress research is how are the acute beneficial responses to stress converted to the prolonged detrimental effects. To this end, studies have been directed to comparing the response of the adrenal medulla to acute and chronically repeated stress. Exposure to stress, not only triggers rapid NE and Epi release, but also leads to longer lasting changes in gene expression.

The effect of various stress of different duration on gene expression of catecholamine biosynthetic enzymes in the adrenal medulla has been reviewed710. Even a few minutes of immobilization stress (IMO) already triggers induction and/or phosphorylation of several transcription factors and elevates transcription of catecholamine biosynthetic enzymes1113. Moreover, exposure to single episode of immobilization stress (IMO) alters the response to subsequent exposure to the same stressor on the next day. For example, the phosphorylation of transcription factor CREB in adrenal medulla is much more pronounced and sustained on the second than on first IMO12. However, chronically repeated stress is required to manifest new steady state catecholamine levels9,14.

The full repertoire of genes whose expression in the adrenal medulla is altered under these conditions has not been previously determined. In the present study, in order to understand long-term consequences of stress, and to obtain a complete picture of changes in gene expression triggered by single and repeated stress, microarray analysis was applied. It enabled us to explore networks of connections among the genes responsive to stress. The findings revealed many previously unidentified targets and potential new biomarkers for adrenomedullary response to stress and help to delineate the mechanisms for the common and distinct responses to acute and repeated exposure to stress.

Methods

Animal procedures

All animal experiments were performed in accordance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Male, murine pathogen-free, Sprague-Dawley rats (280–320 g) were obtained from Taconic Farms (Germantown, NY). The animals were maintained under controlled conditions of a 12-hr light-dark cycle (lights on from 06:00 AM to 18:00 PM) at 23±2 °C with food and water ad libitum. IMO was performed as previously described1517. For repeated stress, the animals were immobilized for 2 hr daily for 6 consecutive days. Control groups were not exposed to stress. All animal manipulations were performed between 08:00 AM and 13:00 PM.

Following the last IMO, rats were euthanized by decapitation and both adrenals were dissected from the animals. To isolate the adrenal medulla, a small incision was made to the edge of the cortex and the medulla was gently squeezed out. Subsequently any cortex tissue adhering to the adrenal medulla was carefully removed. It had been estimated by immunocytochemistry that the medulla was more than 95% pure17. The right and left adrenal medullae from each individual animal was frozen separately in liquid nitrogen and kept at −80°C.

RNA Isolation

RNA was isolated from two separate immobilization experiments. To minimize sample variability caused by individual differences among animals, each sample was pooled from left adrenal medulla from 4 individual rats. There were 3-pooled samples (12 animals total) for each group. RNA was extracted using Absolutely RNA Miniprep Kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). The integrity of the RNA was assessed by the A260/A280 ratio which was close to 2.0 and by electrophoresis (Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100).

Microarray

This part of experiment was performed by the NIH Neuroscience Microarray Consortium at UCLA Medical Center (Los Angeles, CA). It is described briefly as follows. Total RNA (≥ 4 μg) from each group was converted to cDNA by using superscript reverse transcriptase and the T7-Oligo (dT) promoter primer kit (Affymetrix, Inc). Following RNase H-mediated second-strand cDNA synthesis, the double-stranded cDNA were purified and served as a template in the subsequent in vitro transcription reaction (Affymetrix, Inc.). The in vitro transcription reaction was carried by T7 RNA polymerase and a biotinylated nucleotide analog/ribonucleotide mix (Affymetrix, Inc.). The biotinylated cRNA targets were cleaned up and fragmented. Each cRNA was hybridized to an individual Affymetrix GeneChip Rat Array Expression 230 2.0 (RAE 230 2.0 array) which was subsequently processed for washing and staining with the antibody stain solution with streptavidin phycoerythrin and the arrays were scanned on the GeneChip Scanner 3000. For detailed protocols see http://www.affymetrx.com.

Microarray Data Analysis

The raw pixel data were uploaded into GeneTraffic (GeneTraffic version 3.2, Iobion Informatics, La Jolla, CA), and all subsequent analyses were performed on a GeneTraffic Server at the Functional Genomics Core Facility of New York Medical College. All the microarray data were analyzed and normalized using a Robust Multi-Chip Analysis (RMA) algorithm with the control data sets as the baseline. According to Iobion Informatics, the median polishing algorithm of RMA helps minimize the effect of noise inherent in microarray data and enhances the discriminating power of the experiment. The quality and the accuracy of each hybridization were checked by Hybridization Annotation and Hybridization Statistics in GeneTraffic program. Statistical analysis was a two-class method comparing the single and repeated IMO probe sets to the probe sets for the controls. The analysis provided the significance level (p-value) for each gene. Differences with a significance of p < 0.01 and at least ± 2.0-fold change in gene expression between the respective stress group and absolute control group.

The expression data generated from GeneTraffic were imported into PathwayAssist software (version 3.0, Iobion Informatics) to provide insights into common regulatory mechanisms of the set of genes and the interactions or pathways, or for all relationships among several proteins.

Real-time Quantitative RT-PCR Assay

Changes observed for some genes in microarray analysis were individually confirmed by real-time RT-PCR. The RNA samples used for RT-PCR were the same as for microarray analysis. Mixture for reverse transcription reactions contained 1 μg total RNA, 1 μM random primer (Sigma), 1 mM dNTP mix, 2.5 units of AMV reverse transcriptase, 1 × AMV buffer, 8 units of RNase inhibitor (Roche, Indianapolis, IN) and were incubated at 42°C for 60 min. PCR reactions (25 μl) were set up with 12.5 μl RT2 Real-Time SYBR Green PCR Master Mix provided by SuperArray Bioscience Co. (Frecerick, MD), 10.5 μl ddH2O, 1.0 μl gene-specific 10 μM PCR primer pair stock (SuperArray Bioscience Co.), and 1.0 μl template cDNA. The real-time thermal cycler program was recommended by SuperArray manufacture protocol [95°C, 10min; 40 cycles of (95°C, 15 sec; 55°C, 35 sec; and 72°C, 30 sec)]. The specificity of the amplified target sequences was confirmed with melting curve analysis of the PCR products. For statistics, the values from triplicate pooled samples from individual animals were divided by the mean of the samples from unstressed control group to give relative values. Results were evaluated by Student’s t-test. A value of p < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results and Discussion

Microarray Profiling

Microarray analysis was performed to obtain an unbiased characterization of changes in gene expression in adrenal medulla with single and repeated exposure to IMO stress. Analysis was performed with samples from unstressed controls and rats exposed to single (1× IMO) for 2 hrs or repeated IMO 2 hr daily for 6 consecutive days (6× IMO). The mean values of unstressed controls were taken as baseline. A scatter plot of the changes compared to control group is shown in Fig. 1 Significant changes were observed in expression of a large number of genes. Therefore, we concentrated on the changes which differed significantly (p<0.01) and were of up-or down- regulated greater than 2-fold compared to unstressed controls. Using this criteria, we identified 651 genes up-regulated, of which 160 were annotated; and 487 down regulated, of which 64 were annotated. Repeated IMO significantly induced 370 transcripts, of which 78 were annotated and 195 down regulated genes of which 22 were defined.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Statistical plots of changes in gene expression with single and repeated IMO stress. Statistic plots showing the significance of changes in gene expression after single (A) and repeated (B) IMO stress. The X-axis which is the mean log2 ratio of the current chip intensity over the baseline chip intensity represents the fold change in the gene expression. The Y-axis represents the statistical significance (p value). Each spot in the plots represents one transcript. The number of transcripts that were up-regulated (right side), and down-regulated (left side) by more than 2-fold with significance of p < 0.01 are indicated.

Thus, nearly 4% of the total genome were found to be significantly (p<0.01) altered greater than 2-fold in the rat adrenal medulla by single IMO, and nearly 2% by repeated IMO stress.

Among the annotated transcripts, 35 up-regulated and 4 down-regulated were common and changed with both single and repeated IMO. Thus, most of the changes with single IMO were unique, while nearly half of the defined transcripts up-regulated by repeated IMO were also changed by single IMO.

Based on Gene Ontology, and PubMed publications, combined with knowledge of the physiological function of the adrenal medulla, we organized and categorized all the defined genes changed with single and repeated IMO stress (Fig. 2). In this paper we will briefly describe the most pronounced changes observed. We particularly discuss those changes which may provide new insight into the mechanism whereby the adrenal medulla responds a new experience of stress compared to repeated exposure to the same stressor.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Percent changes in gene expression with different categories with single and repeated IMO. The percent of the annotated genes up or down regulated with single and repeated IMO are indicated for each category.

Transcription Factors and Nuclear Protein Related

The greatest numbers of changes were observed with transcription factors. Table 1 shows the changes in transcription factor and nuclear protein related genes. Approximately 20% of the transcripts up-regulated by single IMO were transcription factors. Some were previously identified as transcription factors likely responsible for activation of catecholamine biosynthetic genes with IMO stress, such as Egr1 and Fra-21820. Others were not previously recognized as IMO responsive genes in the adrenal medulla. The largest changes with single IMO were in NR4A3 (nuclear receptor subfamily 4, member 3, also know as Nor1, which was increased nearly 100-fold. The elevations of CREM (40-fold) and gonadotropin inducible ovarian transcription factor 1 (32-fold) were also very pronounced. In some cases, several members of the same transcription factor family were induced, such as: ATF3 and ATF4; Fra-1 and Fra-2; nuclear receptor subfamily 4, group A [NR4A1 (Nurr77 or NGF1-B), NR4A2 (Nurr1), and NR4A3 (Nor1)]. Furthermore, in certain transcription factor families, some members were up-regulated and others were down-regulated, such as inhibitors of DNA binding 1 and 4 which were up by nearly 4- and 3-fold respectively, while its member 2 was down by about 3-fold.

Table 1.

Transcription Factors and Nuclear Protein Related Genes

Probe Set ID UniGene ID UniGene Name 1×IMO Fold C (Up) Probe Set ID UniGene ID UniGene Name 6×IMO Fold C (Up)
1369765_at Rn.32936 achaete-scute complex homolog-like 1 12.65 1369765_at Rn.32936 achaete-scute complex homolog-like 1 30.99
1369268_at Rn.9664 activating transcription factor 3 (ATF3) 13.45 1369738_s_at Rn.10251 cAMP responsive element modulator 13.07
1367624_at Rn.2423 activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4) 2.29 1368321_at Rn.9096 early growth response 1 (Egr1) 8.09
1369737_at Rn.10251 cAMP responsive element modulator 39.82 1387306_a_at Rn.89235 early growth response 2 (Egr2) 2.72
1369738_s_at 22.5 1368775_at NA gonadotropin inducible ovarian TF 1 17.5
1368813_at Rn.6975 CCAAT/enhancer binding, δ 3.57 1387028_a_at Rn.2113 inhibitor of DNA binding 1 3.23
1387343_at 2.9 1375120_at Rn.22987 inhibitor of DNA binding 4 2.08
1368321_at Rn.9096 early growth response 1 (Egr1) 8.23 1370138_at Rn.21926 lymphoid enhancer binding factor 1 6.86
1368489_at Rn.11306 fos-like antigen 1 (Fra-1) 3.77 1368488_at Rn.54147 nuclear factor, interleukin 3, regulated 10.63
1387530_a_at Rn.10962 fos-like antigen 2 (Fra-2) 3.61 1387410_at Rn.88129 NR4A2 6.73
1368775_at NA gonadotropin inducible ovarian TF 1 32.06 1369067_at Rn.62694 NR4A3 54.05
1368726_a_at NA gonadotropin inducible ovarian TF 2 10.51 1373632_at Rn.8139 TAF9 RNA polymerase 3.03
1387270_at Rn.12188 hematopoietically expressed homeobox 3.58 1387169_at Rn.24106 transducin-like enhancer of split 3 3.76
1368546_at Rn.9802 HIV type I enhancer binding protein 2 2.64
1388587_at Rn.23638 immediate early response 3 2.91
1387028_a_at Rn.2113 inhibitor of DNA binding 1 3.52
1394022_at Rn.22987 inhibitor of DNA binding 4 2.82
1387788_at Rn.15806 Jun-B oncogene 7.83
1387260_at Rn.7719 Kruppel-like factor 4 (gut) 10.13
1370968_at Rn.2411 nuclear factor kappa B p105 subunit 2.73
1368488_at Rn.54147 nuclear factor, interleukin 3, regulated 15.43
1386935_at Rn.10000 NR4A1 8.85
1369007_at Rn.88129 NR4A2 6.17
1369067_at Rn.62694 NR4A3 97.62
1387200_at Rn.45339 oligodendrocyte transcription factor 1 2.12
1387684_at Rn.96181 peroxisome proliferator activated R δ 5.15
1370224_at Rn.10247 signal transducer and activator of T 3 2.38
1373632_at Rn.8139 TAF9 RNA polymerase II 2.05
1387169_at Rn.24106 transducin-like enhancer of split 3 2.97
1372211_at Rn.3818 v-maf 1.97
1387870_at Rn.82737 zinc finger protein 36 3.07

(Down) (Down)
1368870_at Rn.3272 inhibitor of DNA binding 2 2.62 1368376_at Rn.10712 NR0B2 5.48
1368073_at Rn.6396 interferon regulatory factor 1 2.58
1373471_at Rn.43927 ring finger protein 166 2.18
1387732_at Rn.64629 transcription termination factor 2.13
1387624_at Rn.10845 upstream transcription factor 1 3.17
1399006_at 2.58

Nuclear protein related (Up) Nuclear protein related (Up)

1382756_at Rn.6272 karyopherin alpha 2.65 1370004_at Rn.11098 H2A histone family, member Y 3.27
1368747_at Rn.11324 nucleoporin 98 3.69 1373032_at Rn.9453 musculoskeletal 4.34
1388198_at Rn.11099 nucleoporin p58 2.55
1367761_at Rn.2947 nudE nuclear distribution gene E 2.19
1387912_at Rn.3436 RNA helicase 4.83

Bold – Genes changed by both types of stress; Fold C – Fold change

In addition, changes were observed in some transcription factors containing basic helix-loop-helix motifs, such as achaete-scute complex homolog-like 1 (Mash1). Mash1 is a very crucial factor in the development of the sympathoadrenal lineage and noradrenergic differentiation2123. It might be involved in stress mediated hypertrophy of the adrenal gland as described later in the growth factor section. Interestingly, transcripts for transcription termination factor and inhibitor of DNA binding 2 were down regulated, consistent with large increase in transcription with single IMO.

In the nuclear protein-related factors category, we observed induction in some genes involved in nuclear transport, such as nucleoporin subfamily member karyopherin a, as well as in RNA helicase.

Similar to single IMO, transcription factors were the main category among the changes with repeated IMO, which encompassed 16% of the up regulated gene transcripts. The largest changes were observed in NR4A3 (Nor1) (up 54 fold) an din achaete-scute complex homolog-like 1 (Mash1), (up 31 fold). Most of the transcription factors induced with repeated IMO were also elevated by 1× IMO. Only two genes (Egr2 and lymphoid enhancer binding factor I) were uniquely changed with repeated IMO (Table 1).

Cell Signaling Related

The changes in cell signaling related transcripts, including related to kinase/phosphatases, G proteins, calcium signaling, and channels are shown in Table 2. They comprised more than 16% of those up-regulated and about 14% of those down-regulated with single IMO. Among the kinases, the largest changes were observed in SNF-1 like kinase (>6-fold) and MAPK activated protein kinase 2 (4-fold). Serine/threonine kinase 10 was also elevated (3-fold), while transcript for polo-like kinase increased 3.7-fold. This kinase binds calcium and is implicated in long term synaptic plasticity24. In contrast phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI-3-kinase) isoforms were down regulated. In addition to changes in kinases, we observed alterations in kinase anchor protein (PRKA) family members, with PRKA protein 12 up-regulated (4-fold) and PRKA protein 1 down-regulated (2.7-fold) with single IMO.

Table 2.

Cell Signaling Related Genes

Probe Set ID UniGene ID UniGene Name 1×IMO Fold C (Up) Probe Set ID UniGene ID UniGene Name 6×IMO Fold C (Up)
Kinase/Phosphatase related genes Kinase/Phosphatase related genes

1368869_at Rn.122094 A kinase (PRKA) anchor protein 12 4.07 1367942_at Rn.3494 acid phosphatase 5 2.02
1368868_at 3.07 1398251_a_at Rn.9743 cal/cal-dependent pk II beta 3.23
1388686_at Rn.12942 Down syndrome critical region homolog 1 4.44 1372299_at Rn.92509 cyclin-dependent k inhibitor 1C 4.01
1368124_at Rn.10877 dual specificity phosphatase 5 7.01 1371446_at Rn.6276 MAPK-activated protein kinase 2 4.48
1371446_at Rn.6276 MAPK-activated protein kinase 2 4.28 1368902_at Rn.10128 p21-activated kinase 3 5.24
1368106_at Rn.12100 polo-like kinase 2 3.72 1382307_at Rn.58447 protein phosphatase 1(12A) 2.3
1384262_at Rn.30046 protein phosphatase 1(3B) 5.09 1384262_at Rn.30046 protein phosphatase 1(3B) 5.05
1386971_at Rn.37758 protein phosphatase 1(10) 3.86 1380045_at Rn.30021 PDP isoenzyme 2 4.19
1398807_at Rn.4143 protein phosphatase 1B, β 2.73 1370509_at 4.05
1371136_at 2.21 1371943_at Rn.4052 Ser/Thr-like protein kinase lyk4 3.56
1380045_at Rn.30021 PDP isoenzyme 2 4.12
1370509_at 3.82
1367936_at Rn.4190 serine/threonine kinase 10 3.08
1367802_at Rn.4636 serum/glucocorticoid regulated kinase 2.03
1368597_at Rn.42905 SNF1-like kinase 8
1368596_at 6.72
1368254_a_at Rn.18522 sphingosine kinase 1 2.74

(Down) (Down)
1369069_at Rn.91372 A kinase (PRKA) anchor protein 1 2.66 1369069_at Rn.91372 A kinase (PRKA) anchor protein 1 4.24
1370923_at Rn.36170 expressed in non-metastatic cells 6 2.52
1370100_at Rn.22497 PI-3-kinase, class 2 2.08
1369655_at Rn.30010 PI-3-kinase, class 3 2.61

G-protein related genes (Up) G-protein related genes (6×IMO) (Up)

1370649_at Rn.9845 bradykinin receptor b2 6.59 1370649_at Rn.9845 bradykinin receptor b2 14.24
1370650_s_at 3.89 1370650_s_at 4.97
1387596_at Rn.10543 thrombin receptor-like 1 2.36 1369624_at Rn.91303 prolactin releasing hormone 7.21
1387908_at Rn.54720 DEXRAS1 (Dexras1) 4.33
1384979_at Rn.92385 G protein-coupled receptor 50 2.53
1368029_at Rn.4368 guanine nucleotide binding protein 2.07

(Down) (Down)
1371635_at Rn.3566 transmembrane domain protein regulated 2.27 1370449_at Rn.87082G protein-coupled receptor 105 2.42

Calcium related genes (Up) Calcium related genes (6×IMO) (Up)

1387276_at Rn.80575 ania-4 4.78 1387276_at Rn.80575 ania-4 6.08
1370050_at Rn.7208 ATPase 2.56 1369117_at Rn.90085 cal/cal-related polypeptide, a 2.87
1369116_a_at Rn.90085 cal/cal-related polypeptide, a 15.17 1370000_at Rn.41602 nucleobindin 2
1369117_at 5.61
1370775_a_at 3.39
1369886_a_at Rn.23560 calcium binding protein 1 2.1

Channel related genes (1×IMO) (Up) Channel related genes (6×IMO) (Up)

1387477_at Rn.64577 potassium channel K12 3.01
1368751_at Rn.10878 potassium voltage-gated S3 3.44

(Down) (Down)
1368343_at Rn.10970 potassium voltage-gated channel, H2 2.18 1370757_at Rn.81221 calcium channel, 3 2.3
1369674_at Rn.10257 purinergic receptor P2X, 5 3.51 1369059_at Rn.86991 ChaK 3.29

Other Signaling related genes (Up) Other Signaling related genes (Up)

1368605_at Rn.30041 adaptor protein 2.38
1369468_at Rn.48736 frizzled homolog 4 (Drosophila) 2.97
1370454_at Rn.37500 homer homolog 1 (Drosophila) 11.33
1370997_at 8.78
1370669_a_at Rn.44869 phosphodiesterase 10A 10.63
1368438_at 8.96
1369044_a_at Rn.37733 phosphodiesterase 4B 2

(Down) (Down)
1368660_at Rn.42899 cAMP-GEFI 2.23 1398299_at Rn.105776 Rho GEF 11 2.14
1387499_a_at Rn.51153 phosducin-like 2.61 1393955_at Rn.79380 WD-containing protein 2.19
1370196_at Rn.14548 protein inhibitor of activated STAT 3 2.94 1371027_at Rn.21799 Cas-Br-M ectropic RTS b 3.02
1387186_at Rn.35289 RAB9, member RAS oncogene family 2.48
1369024_at Rn.3228 rabaptin 3.21

Bold – Genes changed by both types of stress; Fold C – Fold change

The transcripts of several phosphatases were also up-regulated. The largest change was in dual specificity phosphatase 5 (up 7-fold), which can target Erk1, Erk2. Several isoforms of protein phosphatase 1, which de phosphorylate serine/threonine residues were also up-regulated (2 to 5 fold).

The largest change in G-protein related genes was in the transcript for bradykinin receptor b2 (BDKRb2), which is induced more than 6-fold. Stimulation of BDKRb2 activates PKC and triggers release of intracellular calcium25. It also is important in activation of calcium dependent NOS, formation of NO and activation of cGMP pathway26,27. Brakykinin is reported to acts as a secretagogue of medullary catecholamines28. Bradykinin and also induces NO and prostacyclin formation in adrenolmedullary endothelial cells. We have previously shown that bradykinin can elevated TH and DBH gene expression in PC12 cells29. We speculate that bradykinin, via BDKRb2, may be involved in mediating the IMO triggered elevation of TH gene expression in the adrenal medulla, which is observed even in rats which underwent hypophysectomy and splanchnic nerve section14. In regard, it is interesting to note that BRKRb2 is higher in adrenal medulla of the stress prone SHR compared to WKY rats30.

Expression of several other genes involved in G-protein coupled signaling were also altered, including: cAMP inducible exchange factor (cAMP-GEF1) (down >2-fold); Rab9, which encodes a small GTP-binding protein and rabaptin, which encodes another small protein interacting with Rab5, were reduced by 2–3-fold.

Several calcium-related genes were up-, but not down-, regulated. The greatest changes were observed with calcitonin/calcitonin-related polypeptide, α (CALCA), which codes for the peptide CGRP and neurotransmitter-induced early gene protein 4 (ania-4) which is implicated in regulation of calcium in neurons31. Two calcium channel related genes were down-regulated and two potassium channel related genes were up-regulated.

Several other signaling related genes were also changed (Table 2). The largest changes were in homer homolog 1 (up 11-fold) and in phosphodiesterase 10A (up at least 9-fold). The transcript for phosphodiesterase 14B (PDE10A, PDE4B) was also induced. These phosphodiesterases, are involved in both cAMP and cGMP turnover in many physiological and pathophysiological situations, were up-regulated more than 10- and 8-fold.

Many of the changes in signaling related transcripts with single IMO were not observed with repeated IMO. However, among the overlapping changes in response to both single and repeated IMO in kinase/phosphatase genes were MAPKAPK2 (up >4-fold) and PRKA anchor protein 1 (down > 4fold). With repeated IMO, several additional kinase- and phosphatase-related transcript were uniquely observed to be up-regulated, such as calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II beta subunit (3-fold), p21-activated kinase 3 (5-fold) and ser/thr-like protein kinase lyk 4 (3.6-fold).

Among G-protein-related only BDKRb2 was up-regulated by both types of stress. Like with single IMO, 6×IMO also induced mRNA for ania-4 (6-fold), which has similarity to calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinases and to human doublecortin and it is implicated in regulation of calcium in neurons31. With repeated IMO calcium channel, γ3 as well as ChaK, a dual function transmembrane protein which functions as both a calcium-permeant ion channel and serine/threonine protein kinase; were down regulated about 2–3 fold.

These results implicate many more signally related changes than previously studied. Marked differences in cell signaling pathways in the adrenal medulla with single and repeated exposure to IMO stress and are important to distinguish between molecular processes leading to adaptation to stress or to pathological consequences of chronically repeated stress.

Growth/Apoptosis Related

The changes in growth factor and apoptosis related genes are shown in Table 3. They comprised 11% of the up-regulated and 12% of the down regulated changes with single IMO. The largest change in this category was in brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), which was elevated 18.4 fold. EGF receptor and inhibin α genes were up-regulated by about 4.5- and 4-fold. At the same time, the transcript for FGF receptor activating protein 1 and several differentiation-related genes were down-regulated by more than 2-fold. The changes in growth factor and related genes may be involved in the increased size of adrenal medulla which has been observed following various types of chronic stress3236. However, it is perhaps surprising that even with single IMO, there were already changes in growth factor expression. Fewer growth factor-related genes are changed by the repeated compared to single IMO. However, most of the growth factor related genes changed by 6×IMO were also changed by 1×IMO. BDNF showed the largest change also with repeated IMO.

Table 3.

Other Major Changes in Gene Expression with Single and Repeated IMO Stress

Probe Set ID UniGene ID UniGene Name (1×IMO) Fold C Probe Set ID UniGene ID UniGene Name (6×IMO) Fold C
Growth factor related genes Up Growth factor related genes Up

1386994_at Rn.27923 B-cell translocation gene 2 5.86 1368677_at Rn.11266 brain derived neurotrophic factor 14.42
1386995_at 4.71 1387244_at Rn.87514 cell growth regulator 5.02
1370823_at Rn.25267 BMP and AMB inhibitor 2.73 1387951_at Rn.18841 decay-accelarating factor 3.1
1368677_at Rn.11266 brain derived neurotrophic factor 18.36 1369012_at Rn.9874 inhibin beta-A 3.37
1387244_at Rn.87514 cell growth regulator 7.08
1387951_at Rn.18841 decay-accelarating factor 4.72
1370830_at Rn.37227 epidermal growth factor receptor 4.51
1387663_at Rn.10454 glia maturation factor, β 7.67
1386908_at Rn.1484 glutaredoxin 1 (thioltransferase) 2.72
1367705_at 2.17
1387124_at Rn.8831 inhibin alpha 3.75
1387922_at Rn.4346 late gestation lung protein 1 2.07
1370174_at Rn.2232 MDP response gene 116 3.59
1367874_at Rn.4169 ras homolog gene family, member Q 4.23
1386967_at 2.76
1369867_at Rn.96242 sialyltransferase 8 A 2.48
1396101_at Rn.10647 stanniocalcin 1 4.49
1387623_at 2.04
1387280_a_at Rn.32261 tumor-associated protein 1 4.07

Down Down
1370327_at Rn.24747 COMM domain containing 5 2.55 1368924_at Rn.2178 growth hormone receptor 5.19
1370204_at Rn.94200 FGF receptor activating protein 1 2.13
1368618_at Rn.30028 growth factor receptor bound protein 14 3.03
1398785_at Rn.6775 multiple endocrine neoplasia 1 2.05
1392743_at Rn.77753 myc induced nuclear antigen 2.64
1398867_at Rn.19573 neuronal differentiation-related gene 2.59
1370336_at Rn.15599 pregnancy-induced growth inhibitor 2.36
1387427_at Rn.51136 RAD50 homolog (S. cerevisiae) 2.17
1387153_at Rn.34221 reversion induced LIM gene 2.58

Apoptosis related genes Up Apoptosis related genes Up

1367752_at Rn.40101 breast cancer anti-estrogen resistance 1 2.16 1395237_at Rn.107482 annexin V-binding protein ABP-7 4.09
1368860_at Rn.40778 pleckstrin homology-like domain, A1 21.8 1378247_at Rn.20681 ELL associated factor 2 3.68
1368025_at Rn.9775 DNA-damage-inducible transcript 4 5.41 1368860_at Rn.40778 pleckstrin homology-like domain, A1 5
1370319_at Rn.2923 peptidylprolyl isomerase F 2.2

Down Down
1367842_at Rn.19953 amyloid beta precursor protein-binding, B1 2.41 1368652_at Rn.32199 caspase 9 2.87
1387055_at Rn.4279 APP-binding protein 1 2.55
1387605_at Rn.81078 caspase 12 2.22
1367890_at Rn.1438 caspase 2 2.3
1370044_at Rn.22800 Fas apoptotic inhibitory molecule 3.1
1390434_at Rn.18545 TNFRSF1A-associated via death domain 4.17
1371131_a_at Rn.2758 upregulated by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D-3 2.34

Secretion/Neuropeptide related genes Up Secretion/Neuropeptide related genes Up

1369717_at Rn.47720 neuromedin U 5 1370028_at Rn.10149 angiotensin 1 converting enzyme 1 2.42
1370408_at Rn.8865 putative small membrane protein NID67 2.37 1369116_a_at 2.59
1387569_at Rn.74043 synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2c 2.49 1370507_at Rn.11279 disks large-associated protein 4 4.87
1369619_at Rn.153037 urocortin 2 8.73 1369717_at Rn.47720 neuromedin U 37.48
1368805_at Rn.48886 urotensin 2 3.17 1368369_at Rn.87935 prepronociceptin 3.52
1368805_at Rn.48886 urotensin 2 3.83
1390257_at Rn.28719 vesicle-associated membrane protein 2.14

Down Down
1372950_at Rn.90025 blocked early in transport 2.55
1369414_at Rn.64627 syntaxin binding protein 3 2.83

Stress related genes Up Stress related genes Up

1387282_at Rn.102906 crystallin, alpha C (Hsp22) 6.21 1368247_at NA heat shock 70kD protein 1B 11.87
1388721_at 6 1388850_at Rn.3277 heat shock protein 1, alpha 2.42
1368852_at Rn.64562 DnaJ-like protein 1.96
1370912_at Rn.1950 heat shock 70kD protein 1A 7.01
1368247_at NA heat shock 70kD protein 1B 13.76
1378002_at Rn.58449 osmotic stress protein 94 kDa 3.9

Down Down
1367741_at Rn.4028 ubiquitin-like domain member 1 2.06 1382809_at Rn.28931 cold inducible RNA binding protein 3.89

Structural protein related genes Up Structural protein related genes Up

1372658_at Rn.46362 desmuslin 2.83 1370053_at Rn.90059 discs 2.75
1370017_at Rn.10968 emerin 4.89 1387031_at Rn.32904 endoplasmic retuclum protein 29 2.35
1387202_at Rn.12 intercellular adhesion molecule 1 4.11 1387843_at Rn.2743 follistatin 7.51
1388932_at Rn.62616 laminin, alpha 5 2.55 1388244_s_at Rn.999 laminin receptor 1 2.47
1371682_at Rn.3135 microtubule-associated protein 1 LC3 α 3.01 1371682_at Rn.3135 microtubule-associated protein 1 LC3 α 3.68
1370478_at Rn.48756 myosin heavy chain Myr 8 5.25 1370478_at Rn.48756 myosin heavy chain Myr 8 12.57
1370697_a_at Rn.107975 nexilin 2.19
1370875_at Rn.773 villin 2 3.83

CXC-motif related genes Up CXC-motif related genes Up

1367973_at Rn.4772 chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 7.14
1367940_at Rn.12959 chemokine orphan receptor 1 33.36

Down Down
1370097_a_at Rn.44431 chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 4 8.5 1370097_a_at Rn.44431 chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 4 9.1
1373661_a_at 6.3 1373661_a_at 6.18
1389244_x_at 5.9 1389244_x_at 5.13

Cytokine related genes Up Cytokine related genes Up

1388233_at Rn.14523 cytokine inducible SH2-containing protein 6.8 1387180_at Rn.10758 interleukin 1 receptor, type II 3.83
1368134_a_at Rn.10471 interleukin 4 receptor 5.12 1368134_a_at Rn.10471 interleukin 4 receptor 4.51
1369584_at Rn.81237 suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 2.36

Down Down
1368375_a_at Rn.2490 interleukin 15 2.47 1368375_a_at Rn.2490 interleukin 15 4.63

Metabolism related genes Up Metabolism related genes Up

1367982_at Rn.97126 aminolevulinic acid synthase 1 7.44 1370375_at Rn.10202 glutaminase 2 (liver, mitochondrial) 5.42
1370964_at Rn.5078 arginosuccinate synthetase 6.23 1371350_at Rn.41420 methionine adenosyltransferase II, α 2.91
1383248_at Rn.7038 flavin containing monooxygenase 5 3.13 1386951_at Rn.100240 NADH dehydrogenase 1 α 5 5.51
1370375_at Rn.10202 glutaminase 2 (liver, mitochondrial) 5.78 1370354_at Rn.13634 poly (ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase 4.94
1386914_at Rn.3862 guanosine monophosphate reductase 7.07 1371762_at Rn.108214 retinol binding protein 4 4.65
1374903_at Rn.8807 I-branching β-1,6-ASATF 2.32
1371350_at Rn.41420 methionine adenosyltransferase II, α 2.41
1386951_at Rn.100240 NADH dehydrogenase 1 α 5 6.13
1370191_at Rn.6290 ornithine decarboxylase antizyme inhibitor 2.12
1369785_at Rn.18690 PP amidotransferase 2.92
1370354_at Rn.13634 poly (ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase 6.05
1386981_at Rn.6085 solute carrier family member 1 2.07

Down Down
1373838_at Rn.44467 α 1,3-fucosyltransferase Fuc-T 2.39 1388044_at Rn.44844 6-PF-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-BP 2 2.2
1367991_at Rn.22161 glucosidase 1 2.29 1387973_at Rn.10170 cytochrome P450 4F4 4.31
1386983_at Rn.11080 hydroxymethylbilane synthase 2.48 1379885_at Rn.6404 flavin containing monooxygenase 4 2.78
1387187_a_at Rn.37420 N-acetyltransferase 1 2.62
1368756_at Rn.9674 thioesterase domain containing 1 3.76
1389689_at Rn.43153 valyl-tRNA synthetase 2-like 2.55

Lipid-Metabolism related genes Up Lipid-Metabolism related genes Up

1367915_at Rn.252 diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase 1 11.93 1390549_at Rn.101807 adiponectin receptor 2 2.18
1387630_at Rn.4243 fatty acid elongase 1 4.83 1387796_at Rn.11318 arachidonate 12-lipoxygenase 2.01
1394401_at Rn.46942 fatty acid elongase 2 6.32 1367979_s_at Rn.107152 cytochrome P450, subfamily 51 5.68
1388108_at 4.74 1367915_at Rn.252 diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase 1 6.08
1387233_at Rn.7040 hydroxysteroid (17-beta) dehydrogenase 7 4.7 1368878_at Rn.10780 isopentenyl-diphosphate delta isomerase 7.8
1368878_at Rn.10780 isopentenyl-diphosphate delta isomerase 5.04 1368020_at Rn.10288 mevalonate (diphospho) decarboxylase 2.89
1368570_at Rn.54479 lecithin-retinol acyltransferase 17.89 1368015_at Rn.7730 prostaglandin E synthase 10.5
1368683_at Rn.87449 oxidised LDL receptor 1 15.44 1368014_at 3.05
1368014_at Rn.7730 prostaglandin E synthase 4.97
1368527_at Rn.44369 prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 12.27
1367855_at Rn.88169 scavenger receptor class B, member 1 4.57
1386956_at 4.54

Down Down
1367638_at Rn.13468 malonyl-CoA decarboxylase 2.09 1388211_s_at Rn.37524 cytosolic acyl-CoA thioesterase 1 2.78
1369070_at Rn.29982 peroxisomal biogenesis factor 12 2.04
1387064_at Rn.4065 peroxisomal membrane protein 3 3.23
1396866_s_at 3.00

Protease related genes Up Protease related genes Up

1368223_at Rn.7897 metalloprotease with thrombospondin 1,1 8.1 1387135_at Rn.98788 metalloproteinase domain 15 2.35
1392894_at Rn.64635 fibrinogen-like 2 2.45 1368223_at Rn.7897 metalloprotease with thrombospondin 1,1 4.77
1367800_at Rn.107102 plasminogen activator 4.1 1368595_at Rn.3117 matrix metalloproteinase 24 2.1
1387269_s_at Rn.82711 plasminogen activator, urokinase receptor 6.92 1368901_at Rn.88295 thrombomodulin 2.41
1392264_s_at Rn.29367 serine/cysteine proteinase inhibitor, 1 10.36
1368519_at 4.37
1387812_at Rn.950 Subtilisin - like endoprotease 3.3
1367712_at Rn.25754 tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 2.08

Down Down
1368904_at Rn.8875 calpain 10 2.79 1368904_at Rn.8875 calpain 10 3.24
1375951_at Rn.88295 thrombomodulin 7.57
1368900_at 5.95
1368901_at 5.19
1367966_at Rn.10902 dipeptidylpeptidase 3 2.14 1367860_a_at Rn.10371 matrix metalloproteinase 14 4.26

Miscellaneous genes Up Miscellaneous genes Up

1368111_at Rn.11149 BTB domain containing 2 3.84 1368111_at Rn.11149 BTB domain containing 2 2.91
1370951_at Rn.12038 ER transmembrane protein Dri 42 2.25
1370950_at 2.42
1370177_at Rn.10677 poliovirus receptor 11.92

Down Down
1373034_at Rn.103351 tryptophan rich basic protein 2.42

Bold – Genes changed by both types of stress; Fold C – Fold change

A substantial number of apoptosis related transcripts were also changed. In this category, the most robust changes were observed in the induction (22-fold) of pleckstrin homology-like domain family A, member 1 which can also be induced by growth factors and differentiating agents and it has been implicated in mediating programmed cell death37. Several apoptosis related transcripts were down regulated, such as caspase 2 and caspase 12. With repeated IMO there were less changes in apotosis related genes. From the changes with single IMO only pleckstrin homology-like domain family A, member 1 was also induced (up 5 fold). Caspase 9 was down-regulated by about 3 fold following repeated IMO, perhaps consistent with hypertrophy of the adrenal with repeated IMO.

Neurosecretion and Neuropeptide Related

The neurosecretion and neuropeptide related transcripts changed are also shown in Table 3. With single IMO they represent only 3% of the changes. However, several of these neuropeptide-related genes may be important in mediating the response to stress, such as urocortin 2 (Ucn2) (increased 9-fold) neuromedin (increased 5-fold), and urotensin 2 (increased 3-fold). Urocortins are reported to mediate adaptive responses of the cardiovascular system to stressful conditions [reviewed in38]. Ucn2 immunoreactivity was previously observed in TH positive cells in rat adrenal medulla and locus coeruleus39,40. Administration of Ucn2 to PC12 cells increased NE release and phosphorylation of TH41.

More of neurosecretion and neuropeptide related transcripts (8%) were changed with repeated stress than with single IMO. Neuromedin U (37 fold) and urotensin 2 (4 fold) were also increased with repeated IMO. Urotensin 2 is the most potent mammalian vasoconstrictor to date. Plasma urotensin 2 levels are elevated in congestive heart failure patients and may play a role in progression of the disease42. Central neuromedin U is implicated in the stress-induced activation of CRF-containing neurons in the paraventricular nucleus43.

In addition, transcripts of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) and prepronociceptin genes were induced, as well as two genes associated with synaptic vesicle function. Prepronociceptin was induced by repeated stress by more than 3-fold. Nociceptin, also known as orphanin FQ, is an endogenous ligand for the opioid receptor-like 1 (NOP) receptor and has some structural homology with the endogenous opioid peptide dynorphin A44,45. It is implicating as playing an important role in several physiological functions including pain, anxiety, locomotion, learning, and memory. It is attractive to speculate that the induction of norciceptin may participate in stress triggered nociception.

Stress Related

A number of genes related to stress were induced (Table 3) including heat shock 70kD protein 1B (up over 10-fold) with both single and repeated IMO and heat shock 70kD protein 1A (up 7 fold) with 1× IMO).

Structural

Some structural related genes (Table 3), such as desmuslin, intercellular adhesion molecule 1, myosin heavy chain Myr 8, also showed more than 2-fold change, and in some cases as much as 5-fold elevated expression. The percentage of changes in structural genes was slightly higher in response to repeated IMO than to single IMO (7.6% vs. 5%)

Immune Related

Although only a few of the changes related to immune function, these changes might be very important. As shown in Table 3, transcripts of chemokine orphan receptor 1 was induced by 33-fold and chemokine (C-C) motif ligand 2 was up-regulated by 8-fold with single IMO. One of the cytokine receptor-related genes, interleukin 4 receptor was up-regulated by 5-fold. In addition, chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) gene expression was more than 8-fold down-regulated. One of the ligands of cytokine receptors, interleukin 15, was regulated by more than 2-fold at the same time.

The list of immune response related genes changed by repeated IMO was similar to the genes changed by single IMO. CXCR4 was severely reduced by 9-fold and interleukin 15 by more than 4-fold.

Metabolism Related

The results also indicate that 2-hour single IMO could trigger marked changes in metabolism. We found changes of genes that related to enzymes involved in many metabolic pathways. Most of the up-regulated genes related to metabolism and also to lipid-metabolism in repeated IMO were already up-regulated with single IMO. Diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase 1, methionine adenosyltransferase II, alpha, NADH dehydrogenase 1 alpha subcomplex 5, poly (ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase (PARG) and prostaglandin E synthase (PTGES) showed large changes, as they also did with single IMO.

Protease Related

There were some changes in protease related genes, some of which were quite large, such as greater than 5-fold induction of thrombomodulin, metalloprotease with thrombospondin 1, plasminogen activator urokinase receptor, and serine/cysteine proteinase inhibitor 1.

Protease related genes, such as metalloprotease with thrombospondin 1(14.8-fold) and thrombomodulin (2.41-fold) were also increased by repeated IMO. Among the down-regulated genes that related to protease, calpain 10 was reduced by both types of stress (2.8-, 3.2-fold). Matrix metalloproteinase 14 (MMP14) was up-regulated by more than 4-fold with repeated IMO.

Others

A few of the genes were not easily categorized (Miscellaneous genes in Table 3). The undefined or genes not annotated are given in Table 4.

Validation of Changes of Selected Genes

Selected genes from different categories showing robust changes by microarray analysis were chosen for validation. Real-time RT-PCR was performed to quantify the relative expression levels of mRNA for bradykinin receptor b2 (BDKRb2) in both stress groups and urocortin 2 (Ucn2), phosphodesterase (PDE) 10A, as well as chemockine receptor 4 (CXCR4) in single IMO group (Fig. 3A). To validate changes in repeated stress group, expression levels of BDKRb2, BDNF, neuromedin U, and Matrix metalloproteinase 14 (MMP14) were quantified by real-time RT-PCR as well (Fig 3B).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Validation of selective microarray results from IMO stress experiment by real-time RT-PCR. Quantitative real-time RT-PCR showing the changes in mRNA levels of bradykinin receptor b2 (BDKR b2), phosphodiesterase 10A (PDE 10A), urocortin2, chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 4 (CXCR4), BDNF, neuromedin U (NMU) and matrix metalloproteinase 14 (MMP14) with single IMO (A) or repeated IMO (B). The mean for the control is taken as 1.0. * p < 0.05 versus unstressed controls.

There was good correspondence between the data obtained from microarray and the results from the real-time RT-PCR analysis. BDKRb2 and PDE 10A gene expression increased about 5-fold and 9-fold in the RNA from the 1× IMO group, which is consistent with the microarray results. Urocortin 2 showed a greater than 30-fold increase and CXCR4 was markedly down-regulated by single IMO, which were even greater than the extent of changes from the microarray results. With 6× IMO, BDKRb2 gene showed about 4-fold increase, neuromedin U gene expression increased 5-fold and BDNF gene expression induced 9-fold, and MMP14 about 3-fold, which are similar to the results from the microarray analysis.

Pathway Analysis

The microarray analysis, as detailed above, discovered that hundreds of genes were significantly changed in the adrenal medulla by single as well as by repeated IMO. To further understand how those genes interact with each other and if there are common factors or regulators related to those genes, PathwayAssist software was used to explore networks of connections among the genes responsive to stress. Pathway analysis of direct interactions between the genes which were up- and down-regulated by single (not shown) and repeated IMO (Fig. 4) shows that a number of genes changed by repeated IMO can regulate Egr1. Egr1 was previously shown to be induced by stress in the adrenal medulla and to be important for the regulation of TH transcription19,46,47. ACE, together with BDKRb2 and growth hormone receptor together with SOC3 (suppressor of cytokine signaling 3) and CXCR4, as well as BDNF can regulate Egr1 gene expression. BDNF can inhibit several of the down-regulated genes, such as caspase 9 and CXCR4, the later is activated by the down regulated interleukin 15 (IL15), and BDNF, which interacts with PARG. Further downstream interactions of Egr1 and Egr2 are connected to MMP14, PTGES and inhibin-beta-A (INHBA) and follistatin (FST), and subsequently to the CALCA (CGRP) gene product.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Direct interaction of changes in gene expression with repeated IMO stress. Pathway analysis showing the direct interactions among genes down- regulated (green, IL15, CXCR4, GHR, CASP9, MMP14)or up-regulated (pink, all others) or by repeated IMO. The symbols are as follows: ligand: Inline graphic; transcription factor: Inline graphic; kinase: Inline graphic; receptor: Inline graphic nuclear receptor: Inline graphic;: binding:: Inline graphic positive regulations Inline graphic

Pathway analysis also revealed common targets of the genes changed by both single and repeated IMO stress (Fig. 5). Among the changed genes, BDNF, CALCA (CGRP), and Egr1 played especially central roles for downstream activation of other target genes. As shown in Figure 5, BDNF can trigger activation of Egr1, FOS, CREB, JUN, TH, and several neuropeptides, such as vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and neuropeptide Y (NPY), etc. and it inhibits CXCR4 gene expression. It is also clear that the activation of CALCA could further activate MAPK1 and MAPK3 and TH. Egr1, itself a target of BDNF, activated some growth factor and survival related genes, such as NGF receptor, insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS1) and BCL2, several MAK kinases and MAP kinase kinases, and transcription factors such as CREB1.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Putative targets of common changes in gene expression with single and repeated IMO stress. Pathway analysis showing the common targets which are activated or inhibited by the common genes which are decreased (green, IL15, MMP14, CXCR4) or elevated (pink, all others) or by both durations of IMO stress. The symbols are as described in figure above. The abbreviations are as follows: PARP1 [ADP-ribosyltransferase (NAD+; poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase)]; BCL2 (B-cell leukemia/lymphoma 2); BCL2L1 (Bcl2-like 1); BDKRB2 (bradykinin receptor B2); BDNF (brain-derived neurotrophic factor); CALCA (calcitonin/calcitonin-related polypeptide, alpha); CREB1 (cAMP responsive element binding protein 1); CASP3 (caspase 3); CD44 (CD44 antigen); CCK (cholecystokinin); EGR1 (early growth response 1); EGF (epidermal growth factor); EGFR (epidermal growth factor) FOS (FOS oncogene); GAL (galanin); GNRH1 (gonadotropin-releasing hormone 1); GRB2 (growth factor receptor bound protein 2); IER2 (immediate early response 2); INS (insulin); IRS1 (insulin receptor substrate 1); IGF1 (insulin-like growth factor 1); IFNG (interferon, gamma); IL15 (interleukin 15); IL4R (interleukin 4 receptor); JUN (Jun oncogene); MMP14 (matrix metalloproteinase 14); MMP9 (matrix metalloproteinase 9); MAPK1 (mitogen activated protein kinase 1); MAPK3 (mitogen activated protein kinase 3); MAP2K1 (mitogen activated protein kinase kinase 1); RAF1 (murine leukemia viral oncogene homolog 1); NGFR (nerve growth factor receptor); NMU (neuromedin U); NPY (neuropeptide Y); NTF5 (neurotrophin 5); NOS1 (nitric oxide synthase 1); NFIL3 (nuclear factor, interleukin 3 regulated); NR4A1 (nuclear receptor subfamily 4, group A, member 1); NR4A2 (nuclear receptor subfamily 4, group A, member 2); NR4A3 (nuclear receptor subfamily 4, group A, member 3); PARG [poly (ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase]; POMC (proopiomelanocortin); PDP2 (pyruvate dehydrogenase phosphatase isoenzyme 2); SST (somatostatin); SHC1 (src homology 2 domain-containing transforming protein C1); SYN1 (synapsin I); TAC1 (tachykinin, precursor 1); THBD (thrombomodulin); AKT1 (thymoma viral proto-oncogene 1); TRH (thyrotropin-releasing hormone); TGFB1 (transforming growth factor, beta 1); TNF (tumor necrosis factor); TH (tyrosine hydroxylase); UTS2 (urotensin 2); VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor); VIP (vasoactive intestinal peptide); VGF (VGF nerve growth factor inducible).

Summary

The stress transcriptome of the adrenal medulla is quite extensive, especially in response to single immobilization stress. The study reveals many previously unidentified targets in the adrenal medulla. For example, extremely large changes were observed among transcription factors in nuclear receptor subfamily members (NR4A1, NR4A2, NR4A3), CREM and Mash1. Among the cell signalling related genes, changes in several kinase and protein phosphatase genes were identified, as well as down regulation of the transcript for the A kinase anchor protein. Considerable differences in cell signalling related genes was observed in response to single and repeated IMO, although bradykinin receptor b2 (BDKRb2) and transcript for CGRP (CALCA) and ania-4 were common to both single and repeated IMO. A large number of growth factor related transcripts were changed, as well as some apoptosis related genes, with several caspases down regulated. While only a few neuropeptides were identified, induction of urocortin 2 with single IMO, and urotensin 2 and neuromedin U with both durations of stress may be very meaningful. Quite a few of the changes were also observed in transcripts related to structural proteins, metabolism and especially lipid metabolism, as well as several chemokine and cytokines or their receptors. In remains to be determined if all of these changes are specifically localized to the adrenal chromaffin cell type. Pathway analyses demonstrate that Egr-1, BDNF and CALCA are likely key players which may regulate tyrosine hydroxylase transcription and thereby Epi/NE biosynthesis. Overall the findings revealed potential new biomarkers for the adrenal medullary response to stress and provide new mechanistic insights into the common and distinct responses to acute and repeated exposure to stress.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr. Caroline Ojaimi from the Department of Physiology, New York Medical College, Microarray Core Facility: Functional Genome, for guidance with microarray data analysis; and support from NIH grant NS28869, Slovak Research Agency Grant No. APVV-0148-06 and VEGA 2-0133/08; and the assistance of the NINDS/NIMH microarray consortium.

References

  • 1.Cannon W. Organization of physiological homeostasis. Physiological Reviews. 1929;9:3900–431. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Goldstein DS. Stress, Catecholamines and Cardiovascular Disease. Oxford University Press; Oxford: 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.McCarty R, Gold PE. Plasma catecholamines: effects of footshock level and hormonal modulators of memory storage. Horm Behav. 1981;15:168–82. doi: 10.1016/0018-506x(81)90026-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hall JL, Gold PE. Adrenalectomy-induced memory deficits: role of plasma glucose levels. Physiol Behav. 1990;47:27–33. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(90)90038-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Southwick SM, et al. Role of norepinephrine in the pathophysiology and treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 1999;46:1192–204. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(99)00219-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yehuda R, et al. Plasma norepinephrine and 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol concentrations and severity of depression in combat posttraumatic stress disorder and major depressive disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 1998;44:56–63. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(98)80007-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kvetnansky R, Sabban EL. Stress and molecular biology of neurotransmitter-related enzymes. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1998;851:342–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb09008.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sabban EL. Catecholamines in stress: molecular mechanisms of gene expression. Endocrine Regulations. 2007;41:61–73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sabban EL, Kvetnansky R. Stress-triggered activation of gene expression in catecholaminergic systems: dynamics of transcriptional events. Trends Neurosci. 2001;24:91–8. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(00)01687-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wong DL, Tank AW. Stress-induced catecholaminergic function: transcriptional and post-transcriptional control. Stress. 2007;10:121–30. doi: 10.1080/10253890701393529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nankova BB, Tank AW, Sabban EL. Transient or sustained transcriptional activation of the genes encoding rat adrenomedullary catecholamine biosynthetic enzymes by different durations of immobilization stress. Neuroscience. 1999;94:803–8. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(99)00290-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sabban EL, et al. Stress Triggered Changes in Gene Expression in Adrenal Medulla: Transcriptional Responses to Acute and Chronic Stress. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2006;26:845–854. doi: 10.1007/s10571-006-9069-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Osterhout C, Sun B, Tank AW. Regulation of Tyrosine Hydroxylase Gene Transcription Rate by Stress: Use of Transgenic Mice. In: McCarty R, et al., editors. Stress: Neural, Endocrine and Molecular Studies. Taylor & Francis; Londaon: 2002. pp. 107–113. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nankova B, et al. Induction of tyrosine hydroxylase gene expression by a nonneuronal nonpituitary-mediated mechanism in immobilization stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91:5937–41. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.13.5937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.McMahon A, et al. Regulation of tyrosine hydroxylase and dopamine beta-hydroxylase mRNA levels in rat adrenals by a single and repeated immobilization stress. J Neurochem. 1992;58:2124–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1992.tb10954.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kvetnansky R, Mikulaj L. Adrenal and urinary catecholamines in rats during adaptation to repeated immobilization stress. Endocrinology. 1970;87:738–43. doi: 10.1210/endo-87-4-738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Liu X, et al. Increased susceptibility to transcriptional changes with novel stressor in adrenal medulla of rats exposed to prolonged cold stress. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2005;141:19–29. doi: 10.1016/j.molbrainres.2005.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wong DL, et al. Genetic mechanisms for adrenergic control during stress. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004;1018:387–97. doi: 10.1196/annals.1296.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Papanikolaou NA, Sabban EL. Sp1/Egr1 motif: a new candidate in the regulation of rat tyrosine hydroxylase gene transcription by immobilization stress. J Neurochem. 1999;73:433–6. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1999.0730433.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nankova BB, et al. Fos-related antigen 2: potential mediator of the transcriptional activation in rat adrenal medulla evoked by repeated immobilization stress. J Neurosci. 2000;20:5647–53. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-15-05647.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Huber K. The sympathoadrenal cell lineage: specification, diversification, and new perspectives. Dev Biol. 2006;298:335–43. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hirsch MR, et al. Control of noradrenergic differentiation and Phox2a expression by MASH1 in the central and peripheral nervous system. Development. 1998;125:599–608. doi: 10.1242/dev.125.4.599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Guillemot F, et al. Mammalian achaete-scute homolog 1 is required for the early development of olfactory and autonomic neurons. Cell. 1993;75:463–76. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90381-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pak DT, Sheng M. Targeted protein degradation and synapse remodeling by an inducible protein kinase. Science. 2003;302:1368–73. doi: 10.1126/science.1082475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hecquet C, et al. Positive cooperativity between the thrombin and bradykinin B2 receptors enhances arachidonic acid release. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006;290:H948–58. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00868.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Abadir PM, et al. Angiotensin II type 2 receptor-bradykinin B2 receptor functional heterodimerization. Hypertension. 2006;48:316–22. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000228997.88162.a8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Abadir PM, Carey RM, Siragy HM. Angiotensin AT2 receptors directly stimulate renal nitric oxide in bradykinin B2-receptor-null mice. Hypertension. 2003;42:600–4. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000090323.58122.5C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Murakumo Y, et al. Potentiation by ouabain of bradykinin-induced catecholamine secretion and calcium influx into cultured bovine adrenal chromaffin cells: evidence for involvement of Na+ influx associated with the bradykinin B2-receptor. Life Sci. 1995;57:PL259–64. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(95)02141-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gebreyesus K, Kilbourne EJ, Sabban EL. Bradykinin elevates tyrosine hydroxylase and dopamine beta-hydroxylase mRNA levels in PC12 cells. Brain Res. 1993;608:345–8. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(93)91477-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Qadri F, et al. Kinin B2 receptor localization and expression in the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis of spontaneously hypertensive rats. Int Immunopharmacol. 2003;3:285–92. doi: 10.1016/S1567-5769(02)00269-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ohmae S, et al. Molecular identification and characterization of a family of kinases with homology to Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinases I/IV. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:20427–39. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M513212200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kvetnansky R, et al. Bratislavske Lekarske Listy. 1966;46:35–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Scaria KS, Premalatha LS. Cold induced adrenal weight & volume changes in white rats. Indian J Exp Biol. 1967;5:256–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.McCarty R, Horwatt K, Konarska M. Chronic stress and sympathetic-adrenal medullary responsiveness. Soc Sci Med. 1988;26:333–41. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90398-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wolman M, et al. Pathological changes in organs of rats chronically exposed to hypoxia. Development of pulmonary lipidosis. Histol Histopathol. 1993;8:247–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ulrich-Lai YM, et al. Chronic stress induces adrenal hyperplasia and hypertrophy in a subregion-specific manner. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2006 doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00070.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gomes I, et al. A proline- and glutamine-rich protein promotes apoptosis in neuronal cells. J Neurochem. 1999;73:612–22. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1999.0730612.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Nazarloo HP, et al. The roles of corticotropin-releasing factor-related peptides and their receptors in the cardiovascular system. Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2006;7:229–39. doi: 10.2174/138920306777452358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Yamauchi N, et al. Distribution of urocortin 2 in various tissues of the rat. J Neuroendocrinol. 2005;17:656–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2005.01354.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Reyes TM, et al. Urocortin II: a member of the corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) neuropeptide family that is selectively bound by type 2 CRF receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:2843–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.051626398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Nemoto T, Mano-Otagiri A, Shibasaki T. Urocortin 2 induces tyrosine hydroxylase phosphorylation in PC12 cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;330:821–31. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.03.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Gruson D, et al. Circulating urotensin II levels in moderate to severe congestive heart failure: its relations with myocardial function and well established neurohormonal markers. Peptides. 2006;27:1527–31. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2005.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Yokota M, et al. Fos expression in CRF-containing neurons in the rat paraventricular nucleus after central administration of neuromedin U. Stress. 2004;7:109–12. doi: 10.1080/10253890410001727370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Meunier JC, et al. Isolation and structure of the endogenous agonist of opioid receptor-like ORL1 receptor. Nature. 1995;377:532–5. doi: 10.1038/377532a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Reinscheid RK, et al. Orphanin FQ: a neuropeptide that activates an opioidlike G protein-coupled receptor. Science. 1995;270:792–4. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5237.792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Papanikolaou NA, Sabban EL. Ability of Egr1 to activate tyrosine hydroxylase transcription in PC12 cells. Cross-talk with AP-1 factors. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:26683–9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M000049200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Nakashima A, Ota A, Sabban EL. Interactions between Egr1 and AP1 factors in regulation of tyrosine hydroxylase transcription. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2003;112:61–9. doi: 10.1016/s0169-328x(03)00047-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES