Abstract
Three Co(II) isomers assembled from d-, or l-, or dl-camphorate together with achiral isonicotinate exhibit a clear relationship between chirality and helicity even though chiral molecules are not in the backbone of the helix: the absolute sense of helix made of achiral components is controlled by chains of metal and enantiopure chiral ligands running perpendicular to helix in two enantiomeric forms.
Helicity and homochirality are intimately associated with the living processes even though their origin remains unclear. 1 Enzymes, nucleic acids, and other biopolymers made up of L-amino acids or D-sugars etc. have acquired a definite handedness. 2 The research on the relationship between chirality of molecular building blocks and helicity of polymeric structures could ultimately lead to a better understanding on the origin of asymmetry in the living system.
Chirality and absolute helicity are often closely linked with each other in the same structure, although they are two distinct concepts. 3 Chirality includes molecular chirality (molecules with chiral structures) and spatial chirality (resulting from crystallization-based spatial organization of molecular building blocks) whereas helicity is a special form of one-dimensional chirality. The control of the absolute helicity is well-known in 1-D polymers such as DNA in which the handedness of D-sugars leads to the right-handed helicity.
Crystalline porous materials have undergone tremendous development in recent years.4–8 In particular, homochiral framework materials have attracted a significant amount of interest because of their potential applications in enantioselective catalysis, separation etc.9–14 Recently developed metal-organic framework materials (MOFs) have shown great promise for the synthetic design of homochiral framework materials because it is possible to take advantage of the molecular chirality of organic components, in addition to the spatial chirality that often results from the self-assembly-based process.9a In addition to their potential enantioselective applications, one particular reason we are interested in homochiral MOFs is that they can integrate both molecular chirality and absolute helicity, in a way that mimics the chiral and helical features of well-known biopolymeres such as DNA. It is felt that the integrated chiral and helical features of MOFs may provide fresh opportunities and model systems for probing the relationship between chirality and helicity in biopolymers.
In this context, absolute asymmetric assembly of achiral precursors into homohelical structures is especially intriguing. While it is not uncommon to generate chiral and helical structures through the spatial organization of achiral components, the resulting bulk materials are generally racemic.15, 16 To produce homohelical materials in the bulk sample is not a trivial task. Two driving forces have been shown to be able to induce the absolute homo-helicity. One is the internal induction in which the chirality of the molecular building block forms an inherent part of the helical backbone (e.g., the helicity of DNA based on D-sugars). 1 The second one is the external induction in which the chiral source is not part of the helical backbone (e.g., the formation of homohelical structure upon ligation of a chiral ligand). 17
Herein, we report two homochiral cobalt camphorate frameworks [Co2(d-Cam)(int)2(H2O)]n (1d, int = isonicotinate) and [Co2(L-Cam)(int)2(H2O)]n (1l) based on enantiopure d- or l-Cam ligand (H2Cam = camphoric acid). For comparative purpose, we have also prepared one isomeric structure [Co2 (dL-Cam)(int)2(H2O)]n (1r, R denotes racemic) using racemic dl-Cam ligand.
Even though all these structures contain chiral molecules, the helices are actually constructed from achiral units (i.e., cobalt and isonicotinate ligand) while chiral molecules (i.e., D-cam or L-cam) and cobalt form chains that intersect helices from a perpendicular direction in 1D and 1L. Therefore, in this case, the molecular chirality of D- or L-camphorates serves as an external chiral source to interact with the helix made of achiral building blocks. The most interesting aspect in these structures is the observed correlation between molecular chirality and absolute helicity. d- or l-Cam ligand results in homohelical arrangement of achiral components: right-handed helix (P-helix) in 1d (similar to DNA where D-sugars lead to P-helix) and left-handed helix (M-helix) in 1l (Fig. 1a–b). Interestingly, the use of racemic ligands leads both right- and left-handed helices in 1r (Fig. 3d).
Fig. 1.
The linear chain formed from D-camphorate and cobalt runs perpendicular to the P-helix formed from isonicotinate-cobalt in 1d (a) and its mirror image in 1L (b). For color code, see Figure 2a.
Fig. 3.
(a) The building block of the diamond-type net formed by int ligands and dinuclear Co units (blue lines) and its interpenetrating sublattice (green lines) in 1r. In the line representation, the dinuclear Co units are shown in single nodes (blue and green) and the int ligands are shown as lines (blue and green). (b) The d-Cam-Cobalt linear chain in 1r. (c) The l-Cam-Cobalt linear chain in 1r. (d) Topological representation of the 6-connected 48.67 net in 1r, which shows two interpenetrating diamond nets (blue net and green net) linked by adjacent parallel d-Cam-Cobalt (yellow) and l-Cam-Cobalt (red) linear chains.
All three compounds were synthesized under similar hydrothermal conditions except with different optical isomer of camphoric acid.‡ They have the same formula and are therefore isomeric. The structures are characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction.§ 1d and 1l are two enantiomorphic forms based on d- or l-Cam ligand, respectively, while 1r has an achiral and non-centrosymmetric crystal structure based on racemic DL-Cam ligand.
All three frameworks are based on 6-connected dinuclear Co2+ unit which is surrounded by four isonicotinate ligands, two Cam ligand and one terminal aqua ligand (Fig. 2a). In each compound, the chiral camphorate ligand acts as µ4-bridging ligand and links the dinuclear Co units into a homochiral chain (Fig. 1 and Fig. 3b–c).
Fig. 2.
(a) Crystal structure of 1d showing the atom-labeling scheme. Hydrogen atoms were omitted for clarify. (symmetry codes: a = x, y, −1+z; b = 1+x, y,z; c = 2−x, −0.5+y, 1−z); (b) the right-handed single-stranded 21 helix along the b axis based on achiral isonicotinate ligands in 1d.
In 1d, two crystallographically independent Co2+ ions are linked by two independent int ligands into a right-handed 21 helix along the b axis (Fig. 2b), while the enantiopure d-Cam ligands bridge the Co2+ ions into a linear chain parallel to the a axis (Fig. 1a). The three-dimensional framework of 1d (or 1l) can be simplified into the primitive cubic lattice (pcu net).18
In 1r, the achiral isonicotinate ligands link dinuclear Co units to form an interpenetrating diamond structures (Fig. 3a) and two diamond sub-lattices are covalently joined together by the racemic dl- Cam ligands into an unusual 6-connected network with short Schläfli symbol of 48.67 (Fig. 3d). 18
Unlike in 1D (or 1L) with only one handed helix, adjacent parallel d-Cam—Co chains and l-Cam—Co chains in 1r induce the formation of edge-sharing right- and left- handed double-stranded 21 helix along the b axis (Fig. 3d). It is apparent that homochiral chains made of chiral molecular building blocks are closely associated with the sense of the helix formed of achiral components.
In summary, we present here a comparative study of three polymeric isomers in which the chirality of enantiopure ligands dictates the absolute sense of helix made of the achiral components. It is of particular interest to note that unlike 1-D helix such as DNA in which chiral molecules form the backbone of the helix and control the helical sense as an internal driving force, the chiral molecules used here (D- or L-camphorate) serve as the external driving force in the control of helicity.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank the support of this work by NIH (2 S06 GM063119-05).
Footnotes
Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available: [Additional crystallographic diagrams, experimental and simulated XRD patterns, magnetic property of 1d and CIF files]. See DOI: 10.1039/b000000x/
Synthesis of [Co2(d-Cam)(int)2(H2O)]n (1d): Hydrothermal reaction of d-H2Cam (0.1005 g, 0.50 mmol), int (0.1283 g, 1.00 mmol), and CoCO3 (0.1157 g, 1.00 mmol) in mixed H2O (5 mL)/ethylene glycol (2 mL) solution was performed at 160 °C for 3 days, and the mixture was then cooled to room-temperature. The purple crystals of 1 were obtained (yield: 80 % based on camphoric acid). Synthesis of [Co2(L-Cam)(int)2(H2O)]n (1l): Hydrothermal reaction of l-H2Cam (0.0513 g, 0.25 mmol), int (0.0656 g, 0.50 mmol), and CoCO3 (0.0704 g, 0.59 mmol) in mixed H2O (5 mL)/ethylene glycol (2 mL) solution was performed at 160 °C for 3 days, and the mixture was then cooled to room-temperature. The purple crystals of 2 were obtained (yield: 78 % based on camphoric acid). Synthesis of [Co2(dL-Cam)(int)2(H2O)]n (1r): Hydrothermal reaction of dl-H2Cam (0.1003 g, 0.50 mmol), int (0.1244 g, 1.00 mmol), and CoCO3 (0.1203 g, 1.00 mmol) in mixed H2O (5 mL)/ethylene glycol (2 mL) solution was performed at 160 °C for 3 days, and the mixture was then cooled to room-temperature. The purple crystals of 3 were obtained (yield: 85 % based on camphoric acid).
Crystal data for 1d: C22H24Co2N2O9, Mr = 578.29, Monoclinic, space group P21, a = 8.9543(1) Å, b = 13.3217(2) Å, c = 10.5371(1) Å, β =110.195(1)°, V = 1179.66(2) Å3, Z = 2, T = 293(2) K, Dc = 1.625 g/cm3, R(int) = 0.0499, 11273 reflections collected, Flack parameter = 0.013(18), R1(wR2) = 0.0406 (0.0900) and S = 0.950 for 3719 reflections with I > 2σ(I). Crystal data for 1l: C22H24Co2N2O9, Mr = 578.29, Monoclinic, space group P21, a = 8.9412(1) Å, b = 13.2661(2) Å, c = 10.5045(2) Å, β = 110.289(1)°, V = 1168.68(3) Å3, Z = 2, T = 293(2) K, Dc = 1.643 g/cm3, R(int) = 0.0227, 5545 reflections collected, Flack parameter = 0.01(2), R1(wR2) = 0.0438 (0.1096) and S = 1.046 for 2981 reflections with I > 2σ(I). Crystal data for 1r: C22H24Co2N2O9, Mr = 578.29, Orthorhombic, space group Pca21, a = 19.6658(9) Å, b = 8.9899(4) Å, c = 13.6956(6) Å, V = 2421.29(19) Å3, Z = 4, T = 293(2) K, Dc = 1.586 g/cm3, R(int) = 0.0745, 15438 reflections collected, Flack parameter = 0.03(2), R1(wR2) = 0.0450 (0.0889), and S = 0.929 for 2998 reflections with I > 2σ(I). CCDC- 702688 to 702690 (1d to 1r) contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/conts/retrieving.html.
Notes and references
- 1.(a) Mason SF. Molecular Optical Activity and the Chiral Discriminations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1982. [Google Scholar]; (b) Bonner WA. Origins Life Evol. Biosphere. 1994;24:63. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Loewenstein WR. The Touchstone of Life: Molecular Information, Cell Communication, and the Foundations of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1999. [Google Scholar]
- 3.(a) MacDermott AJ. In: Physical Origin of Homochirality in Life. Cline DB, editor. Woodbury, NY: American Institute of Physics; 1996. pp. 241–254. [Google Scholar]; (b) Avalos M, Babiano R, Cintas P, Jiménez JL, Palacios JC. Chem. Commun. 2000:887. doi: 10.1021/jo000907f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.(a) Férey G, Mellot-Draznieks C, Serre C, Millange F. Acc. Chem. Res. 2005;38:217. doi: 10.1021/ar040163i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Guillou N, Livage C, Drillon M, Férey G. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003;42:5314. doi: 10.1002/anie.200352520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Vimont A, Travert A, Bazin P, Lavalley J-C, Daturi M, Serre C, Férey G, Bourrelly S, Llewellyn PL. Chem. Commun. 2007:3291. doi: 10.1039/b703468g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Forster PM, Eckert J, Chang J-S, Park S-E, Férey G, Cheetham AK. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003;125:1309. doi: 10.1021/ja028341v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.(a) Christensen KE, Bonneau C, Gustafsson M, Shi L, Sun JL, Grins J, Jansson K, Sbille I, Su BL, Zou XD. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:3758. doi: 10.1021/ja8002556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Tang LQ, Shi L, Bonneau C, Sun JL, Yue HJ, Ojuva A, Lee BL, Kritikos M, Bell RG, Baosik Z, Mink J, Zou XD. Nature Materials. 2008;7:381. doi: 10.1038/nmat2169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Zou XD, Conradsson T, Klingstedt M, Dadachov MS, O’Keeffe M. Nature. 2005;437:716. doi: 10.1038/nature04097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.(a) Natarajan S, Mandal S. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008;47:4798. doi: 10.1002/anie.200701404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Mahata P, Ramya KV, Natarajan S. Chem. Eur. J. 2008;14:5839. doi: 10.1002/chem.200800240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Mandal S, Natarajan S. Inorg. Chem. 2008;47:5304. doi: 10.1021/ic800333g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.(a) Chen B, Yang Y, Zapata F, Lin G, Qian G, Lobkovsky EB. Adv. Mater. 2007;19:1693. [Google Scholar]; (b) Chen B, Ma S, Zapata F, Fronczek FR, Lobkovsky EB, Zhou H-C. Inorg. Chem. 2007;46:1233. doi: 10.1021/ic0616434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.(a) Kesanli B, Lin W. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2003;246:305. [Google Scholar]; (b) Wu C-D, Lin W. Chem. Commun. 2006:3673. doi: 10.1039/b505916j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.(a) Seo JS, Whang D, Lee H, Jun SI, Oh J, Jeon YJ, Kim K. Nature. 2000;404:982. doi: 10.1038/35010088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Anokhina EV, Go YB, Lee Y, Vogt T, Jacobson AJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:9957. doi: 10.1021/ja062743b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Vaidhyanathan R, Bradshaw D, Rebilly J-N, Barrio JP, Gould JA, Berry NG, Rosseinsky MJ. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006;45:6495. doi: 10.1002/anie.200602242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Xiong R-G, You X-Z, Abrahams BF, Xue Z, Che C-M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001;40:4422. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20011203)40:23<4422::aid-anie4422>3.0.co;2-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.(a) Zhang J, Bu X. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007;46:6115. doi: 10.1002/anie.200701374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Zhang J, Bu X. Chem. Commun. 2008:444. doi: 10.1039/b715945e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Zhang J, Bu X. Chem. Commun. 2008:1756. doi: 10.1039/b719368h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.(a) Murphy DL, Malachowski MR, Campana CF, Cohen SM. Chem. Commun. 2005:5506. doi: 10.1039/b510915a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Garibay SJ, Stork JR, Wang Z, Cohen SM, Telfer SG. Chem. Commun. 2007:4881. doi: 10.1039/b712118k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.(a) Lii K-H, Chen C-Y. Inorg. Chem. 2000;39:3374. doi: 10.1021/ic991356i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Sheu CY, Lee SF, Lii KH. Inorg. Chem. 2006;45:1891. doi: 10.1021/ic0518475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lin Z, Slawin AMZ, Morris RE. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:4880. doi: 10.1021/ja070671y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.(a) Hoskins BF, Robson R, Scarlett NVY. Angew, Chem. Int. Ed. 1995;34:1203. [Google Scholar]; (b) Sun J, Weng L, Zhou Y, Chen J, Chen Z, Liu Z, Zhao D. Angew, Chem. Int. Ed. 2002;41:4471. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20021202)41:23<4471::AID-ANIE4471>3.0.CO;2-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Zhang Q, Bu X, Zhang J, Wu T, Feng P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:8412. doi: 10.1021/ja072274t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.(a) Lu W, Gu J, Jiang L, Tan M, Lu T. Cryst. Growth Des. 2008;8:192. [Google Scholar]; (b) Ma Y, Han Z, He Y, Yang L. Chem. Commun. 2007:4107. doi: 10.1039/b708479j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Xue D-X, Zhang W-X, Chen X-M, Wang H-Z. Chem. Commun. 2008:1551. doi: 10.1039/b717885a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Tian G, Zhu G, Yang X, Fang Q, Xue M, Sun J, Wei Y, Qiu S. Chem. Commun. 2005:1396. doi: 10.1039/b417184e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.(a) Prince RB, Barnes SA, Moore JS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000;122:2758. [Google Scholar]; (b) Tanatani A, Mio MJ, Moore JS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001;123:1792. doi: 10.1021/ja003678n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Bradshaw D, Prior TJ, Cussen EJ, Claridge JB, Rosseinsky MJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004;126:9750. doi: 10.1021/ja0316420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.(a) Blatov VA, Shevchenko AP, Serezhkin VN. Acta Crystallogr. 1995;A51:909. [Google Scholar]; (b) Blatov VA, Carlucci L, Ciani G, Proserpio DM. CrystEngComm. 2004;6:377. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



