Abstract
Elongated fibrinogen molecules are comprised of two outer “D” domains, each connected through a “coiled-coil” region to the central “E” domain. Fibrin forms following thrombin cleavage in the E domain and then undergoes intermolecular end-to-middle D:E domain associations that result in double-stranded fibrils. Factor XIIIa mediates crosslinking of the C-terminal regions of γ chains in each D domain (the γXL site) by incorporating intermolecular ɛ-(γ-glutamyl)lysine bonds between amine donor γ406 lysine of one γ chain and a glutamine acceptor at γ398 or γ399 of another. Several lines of evidence show that crosslinked γ chains extend “transversely” between the strands of each fibril, but other data suggest instead that crosslinked γ chains can only traverse end-to-end-aligned D domains within each strand. To examine this issue and determine the location of the γXL site in fibrinogen and assembled fibrin fibrils, we incorporated an amine donor, thioacetyl cadaverine, into glutamine acceptor sites in fibrinogen in the presence of XIIIa, and then labeled the thiol with a relatively small (0.8 nm diameter) electron dense gold cluster compound, undecagold monoaminopropyl maleimide (Au11). Fibrinogen was examined by scanning transmission electron microscopy to locate Au11-cadaverine-labeled γ398/399 D domain sites. Seventy-nine percent of D domain Au11 clusters were situated in middle to proximal positions relative to the end of the molecule, with the remaining Au11 clusters in a distal position. In fibrin fibrils, D domain Au11 clusters were located in middle to proximal positions. These findings show that most C-terminal γ chains in fibrinogen or fibrin are oriented toward the central domain and indicate that γXL sites in fibrils are situated predominantly between strands, suitably aligned for transverse crosslinking.
Keywords: factor XIII/crosslinking/electron microscopy
Fibrinogen molecules are ≈45 nm in length and are comprised of three major globular domains. There are two outer D domains, each connected by a “coiled-coil” region to the central E domain, within which the halves of each molecule are joined by disulfide bridges (Fig. 1). This article is concerned with precisely locating the carboxy-terminal segment of the γ chain, a region termed “γXL”, that comprises one of several self-association sites in fibrinogen D domains (1). The γXL sequence contains one factor XIIIa amine donor/acceptor-crosslinking site between γ406K and γ398Q or γ399Q [γ398/399Q] (2–4), as well as an overlapping platelet fibrinogen receptor-binding site lying between γ400 and γ411 (5).
To approach our objective, we prepared fibrinogen into which thioacetyl cadaverine amine donors had been covalently incorporated at glutamine acceptor sites in the presence of factor XIIIa (plasma transglutaminase) (Fig. 2). Subsequently, we labeled the thiol group on the cadaverine with an electron dense thiol-specific gold-cluster compound, undecagold-monoaminopropyl maleimide (Au11) (6). Au11-cadaverine-labeled fibrinogen was then examined by high resolution-scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) (7) to locate the Au11 clusters that had been covalently attached at the amine acceptor site (γ398/399Q) in the D domain. The relatively small diameter (0.8 nm) of the Au11 cluster (6) provides a discriminating ultrastructural probe for pinpointing its position in the fibrinogen molecule. Gold cluster labeling has been applied to several proteins or nucleic acids for topographical molecular mapping of specific binding sites or domains (7–11 inter alia) and in particular has been used to determine precisely the location as well as the orientation of the amino terminal portions of the two Aα chains within each fibrinogen E domain (12).
The C-terminal region of each γ chain contains a single crosslinking site at which factor XIIIa catalyzes the formation of γ dimers (1, 13, 14) by incorporating intermolecular reciprocal ɛ-(γ-glutamyl) lysine bridges between a donor γ406 lysine of one chain and a glutamine acceptor at γ398/399 of another (2–4). γ chain crosslinking occurs solely between these residues (2–4, 15, 16), whereas there are several amine donor lysine and amine acceptor glutamine sites in Aα chains (16, 17). Primary amine compounds like cadaverine are competitive amine donor substrates that become specifically incorporated in the presence of factor XIIIa at the single γ chain acceptor site or at one or more α chain acceptor sites (2–4, 15, 18, 19).
Noncovalent interaction between D and E domains in an assembling fibrin polymer facilitates the antiparallel intermolecular alignment of γ chain pairs in D domains, thereby accelerating the rate at which factor XIIIa-catalyzed crosslinking occurs at γXL sites (1, 14). Since the report by Fowler et al. (20), which involved electron microscopic observations on crosslinked fibrinogen dimers, it has been commonly held that the C-terminal γ chain crosslinking sequences in fibrin are situated at the extreme end of each molecule, bridging directly between end-to-end abutted fibrin molecules in a so-called “DD-long” arrangement. Recently, the “end-to-end” crosslinking idea received somewhat revised support from studies of crystals of crosslinked D dimer fragments (21), in which crosslinked C-terminal γ chains, though not situated at the extreme end of the molecule as originally envisioned, were inferred nevertheless to traverse the abutting D domains in an end-to-end alignment. However, several independent lines of evidence, beginning with reports by Selmayr et al. (22, 23), have indicated that the crosslinked γ chain segments in fibrin do not straddle the ends of adjacent D domains but rather tend to extend transversely between each fibril strand (1, 24–26). Evidence in favor of the transverse bond arrangement includes among the above cited articles, the electron microscopic demonstration of double-stranded crosslinked fibrinogen fibrils, visualization of bridging filaments representing transversely positioned γ chains within crosslinked fibrinogen fibrils (1) and in crosslinked D-fibrin-D complexes (26), and evidence indicating that the abutting ends of fibrin D domains where end-to-end intermolecular contacts are now recognized to occur (the so-called D:D site) (1, 21, 25), do not as first proposed (20), contain the C-terminal γ chain segment. Crystallographic analyses of D domain structures (21, 27) have amply confirmed the last conclusion by showing that the C-terminal region of the γ chain emerges from the middle of the γ chain segment of the D domain 3.5 nm from its extreme end (Fig. 1).
The compelling evidence for transverse crosslinking notwithstanding, both crystallographic reports (21, 27) have argued instead, based on data derived from their D domain fragment structures, that in native fibrin polymers only end-to-end crosslinking is possible. This inference stems from a calculation that the C-terminal region of the γ chain cannot possibly bridge the distance required to link two transversely aligned γ chains in an assembled fibrin polymer. More recent reports on single-stranded crosslinked fibrinogen fibrils formed on a fibrin fragment E template (28) or a duplex gly-pro-arg-pro fragment E-like template (29), also have offered evidence for end-to-end crosslinking, and Veklich et al. (28) have inferred from these observations that the same is universally true of the crosslinking that occurs in native assembled fibrin polymers. This general issue will be considered in more detail later, but it will suffice to state at this point that we undertook the gold cluster mapping project described here to further assess the possibility of transverse versus end-to-end crosslinking in ordered polymers of fibrinogen and fibrin.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Fibrinogen.
Fraction I-9 fibrinogen was prepared as described (30). Fibrinogen molecules in this preparation lack ≈100 or more C-terminal Aα chain residues (31), which contain almost all of the lysine amine donor sites (16, 17), and therefore they do not participate in α chain crosslinking of fibrin (32). γ chain dimerization is, however, slightly slower but otherwise normal (1). Human α-thrombin (specific activity, 3.04 units/μg) was obtained from Enzyme Research Laboratories (South Bend, IN).
Factor XIII and Its Activation to Factor XIIIa.
Plasma factor XIII was prepared as described by Lorand and Gotoh (33) and had a specific activity of 2,460 Loewy units/mg (34). Factor XIII was activated to XIIIa at a concentration of 1,000 units/ml in 100 mM NaCl, 50 mM Hepes, pH 7 buffer containing 500 μM DTT by the addition of thrombin (final concentration, 5 units/ml). After activation for 30 min at 37°C, a 10-fold excess of hirudin (50 units/ml; Sigma) was added to inhibit the thrombin. The activated XIIIa preparation was then diluted for use in cadaverine incorporation or fibrinogen-crosslinking experiments.
Synthesis of N-[(acetylthio)acetyl]-Cadaverine (ATA-Cadaverine).
ATA-cadaverine, the starting material for fibrinogen-labeling cadaverine derivatives, was prepared by mixing N-succinimidyl-S-acetylthioacetate (SATA, Calbiochem) in dimethyl sulfoxide in equimolar amounts (430 mM each) with cadaverine (1,5-diaminopentane) (Sigma) containing 1,5-14C cadaverine (14.9 mCi/mmol) (Sigma) in 50 mM Hepes, pH 7.0 buffer, to yield a solution having a final concentration of 120 mM with respect to each reacting component. After overnight incubation at room temperature, 3 ml of the mixture (3.6 μmol of each) was diluted with an equal volume of water and loaded onto a 1.5 × 30 cm column of carboxymethyl-Sephadex (Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ) that had been equilibrated with 20 mM Hepes and 5 mM NaCl, pH 7.0 buffer. The column was developed with a linear gradient by using a limit buffer of 600 mM NaCl and 20 mM Hepes, pH 7.0. Three peaks containing 14C radioactivity emerged, and the chromatographic fractions (3.0 ml each) were assayed for the presence of thiol groups with 5,5′-dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB; Sigma) both before and after treatment with 100 mM hydroxylamine (NH2OH) to deprotect the acetylated thiol group. The first eluted peak contained doubly labeled N, N-di ATA-cadaverine, the second, monovalent N-ATA-cadaverine, and the third, unreacted cadaverine.
Incorporation of Thioacetyl Cadaverine into Fibrinogen, Labeling Fibrinogen with Au11, and Preparation of Fibrin Fibrils.
Thioacetyl cadaverine (TA-cadaverine) was prepared by treating ATA-cadaverine with 100 mM hydroxylamine to remove the protecting acetyl group. After deprotection, the mixture was passed over a 10-ml mercury-containing column of Affi-Gel 501 resin (Bio-Rad) to bind the TA-cadaverine and separate it from non-thiol-containing molecules and then eluted with 25 ml (2.5-column volumes) of 50 mM NH4HCO3 and 10 mM β-mercaptoethanol, pH 7.4. The pooled TA-cadaverine sample was then taken to dryness in a freeze dryer.
TA-cadaverine was incorporated into fibrinogen in 50 mM Hepes, 50 mM NaCl, and 10 mM CaCl2, pH 7.4 buffer at a molar ratio of cadaverine to fibrinogen of 1,000:1 and a factor XIIIa level of 50 units/ml. After 30 min at 25°C, the crosslinking reaction was terminated by addition of EDTA (25 mM, final). Under these conditions, 1.65 mol of TA-cadaverine was incorporated per mol of fibrinogen. After incorporation into fibrinogen, the mixture was reacted overnight with a fivefold molar excess of Au11-monoaminopropyl maleimide that had been prepared as described (6), and the mixture then passed over a Superose 12 (Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ) gel-sieving column to separate fibrinogen from the unbound Au11 cluster. Au11-cadaverine-labeled fibrinogen emerged in two peaks, the first of which was small (<10%) and contained crosslinked dimeric and oligomeric fibrinogen molecules and the second, mostly fibrinogen monomers. Control electron microscope experiments to detect bound Au11 clusters were carried out on fibrinogen isolated from mixtures of fibrinogen and Au11-monopropylamine (i.e., without maleimide “activation”) by gel sieving as described above.
The monomeric Au11-fibrinogen fraction obtained by gel sieving was diluted to a concentration of 20 μg/ml in 300 mM NaCl and 50 mM Hepes (pH 7.4) buffer with thrombin added (2 units/ml, final); the mixture was incubated at room temperature for 30 min, then mixed back and forth in a pipette tip, and applied to the surface of a grid.
Preparation of Crosslinked Fibrinogen Fibrils from Au11-Cadaverine-Labeled Fibrinogen.
The monomeric Au11-fibrinogen fraction obtained by gel sieving was subjected to crosslinking in the presence of factor XIIIa (50 units/ml) for 20 min at a fibrinogen concentration of 100 μg/ml in 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM CaCl2, and 10 mM Hepes, pH 7.4 buffer containing 100 μM DTT. After this incubation period, the mixture was mixed back and forth in a pipette tip, diluted to a fibrinogen concentration of 5 μg/ml in 10 mM Hepes and 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4 buffer (HBS), and applied to the grid for microscopy in the usual way.
In some experiments, Au11-fibrinogen was mixed with an equal amount of unlabeled fibrinogen to yield a final fibrinogen concentration of 240 μg/ml in HBS containing 10 mM CaCl2. Factor XIIIa was added to this mixture (100 units/ml, final), incubated for 20 min at room temperature, mixed back and forth in pipette tip, and diluted with HBS for application to a microscope grid.
Preparation of Au11-Thioacetyl Cadaverine Before Incorporation into Fibrinogen.
In one set of experiments, Au11-TA-cadaverine was prepared from TA-cadaverine by reacting it overnight with Au11-monoaminopropyl maleimide at a 1:1 M ratio in a 150 mM NaCl, 13 mM phosphate, and 1 mM EDTA, pH 7 buffer. The reaction mixture was centrifuged over a Centricon 3 filter (Amicon) in a 100 mM NaCl and 50 mM Hepes, pH 7 buffer to separate unreacted components from the gold compound. The Au11-TA-cadaverine was incubated at a 10:1 M ratio for 30 min with fibrinogen at 1 mg/ml in the presence of factor XIIIa (35 units/ml). After the incubation period, N-ethyl maleimide was added (10 mM, final) to inhibit factor XIIIa, and the mixture was centrifuged over a Centricon 30 membrane filter to separate unbound Au11-TA-cadaverine from the fibrinogen.
Preparation of Samples for STEM.
Samples for STEM were diluted, usually in HBS, to the desired protein concentration (typically 2–20 μg/ml), loaded onto ultrathin carbon films by injecting the specimen into a droplet on the grid surface in the sample buffer and allowing an attachment time of 1 min before exchanging the fluid on the grid surface by multiple wicking, and washing with 150 mM ammonium acetate, pH 7. The grid was then rapidly frozen in degassed liquid nitrogen, freeze-dried, and transferred to the STEM microscope stage under vacuum. Specimens were imaged at the Brookhaven STEM Biotechnology Resource Facility by using a 40-kV probe focused at 0.25 nm. The images were stored digitally as a raster of 512 × 512 pixels. For imaging gold clusters within fibrinogen or fibrin, we used magnifications of 500,000 × (128 nm full scan width) at an electron dose of ≈1 × 104 e−/nm2, whereas for identifying areas containing a good distribution of fibrinogen molecules or fibers, a lower magnification of 125,000 × (512 nm full scan width) at an electron dose of ≈2.5 × 103 e−/nm2.
RESULTS
General Considerations for Studying Au11-Fibrinogen.
Our initial strategy for preparing Au11-cadaverine-labeled fibrinogen was to incorporate ATA-cadaverine directly into fibrinogen in the presence of factor XIIIa, remove the protecting acetyl group by treatment with hydroxylamine, and then label the exposed thiol group with the gold maleimide compound. However, hydroxylamine treatment caused irreversible fibrinogen precipitation, and we soon abandoned that approach in favor of directly incorporating TA-cadaverine into fibrinogen and then labeling the sulfhydryl groups in fibrinogen with Au11-maleimide. For some experiments, we prepared Au11-cadaverine for direct incorporation into fibrinogen, but the amount we obtained was small, making it difficult to attain the high molar ratio of cadaverine to fibrinogen that is necessary to obtain efficient cadaverine incorporation. Nevertheless, we were able to compare Au11-cadaverine-labeled fibrinogen with structurally equivalent Au11-maleimide-labeled TA-cadaverine fibrinogen (hereafter designated simply “Au11-fibrinogen”) by STEM, and although many fewer examples of Au11-cadaverine-labeled fibrinogen molecules were found, the distribution of Au11 label in these structures was essentially the same as for the second type of Au11-fibrinogen (data not shown).
To detect the relatively small Au11 clusters (diameter 0.8 nm) within fibrinogen molecules, we imaged specimens at high magnification (500,000 ×; 0.25 nm/pixel) after first locating promising areas on the grid surface at lower magnifications (e.g., 125,000 ×; 1 nm/pixel). At the higher magnification, Au11 clusters can be detected at a sufficiently low electron dose (≈1 × 104 e−/nm2) that significant biological structure is preserved, although the E domains and the coiled-coil regions of fibrinogen molecules were often not well visualized above the background carbon film. Nevertheless, there was no difficulty in identifying fibrinogen molecules and in determining the position of the Au11 clusters within them.
Au11-Cadaverine-Labeled Fibrinogen.
Au11-fibrinogen showed a relatively high percentage of gold-labeled molecules (≈25% of the total observed). Control experiments with “unactivated” Au11-monopropylamine revealed no evidence of nonspecific fibrinogen labeling by the Au11 cluster (data not shown). Many examples of singly labeled gold cluster-labeled fibrinogen molecules were found, and occasionally we found gold clusters at both ends of a molecule (Fig. 3, molecules 5 and 6). Most gold clusters were situated in the D domain (76%), indicating γ chain labeling at Gln-398/399. Au11 clusters found in the vicinity of the E domain (Fig. 3, molecules 10 and 11) corresponded to Au11-cadaverine labeling of Aα chain Gln acceptor sites. Of the Au11-labeled molecules in the D domain, 79% were located 3–12 nm from the distal end of the D domain, and the remaining 21% were positioned in the distal end of the D domain (Fig. 4). Au11 cluster distribution within the D domain fell into three categories relative to the extreme end of the molecule—distal (0–2 nm; Fig. 3, molecules 5, 8, and 9); middle (3–7 nm; Fig. 3, molecules 4, 6, 7, and 12); and proximal regions (8–12 nm; Fig. 3, molecules 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6).
We considered the position of the Au11 cluster in relation to the labeled γ398/399 site at which cadaverine is incorporated in the presence of factor XIIIa. Molecular modeling of the organic structure (Fig. 2), which has a contour length of 2.7 nm, by an energy minimization procedure (Chem 3D, CambridgeSoft), indicates that it is curvilinear, and the Au11 is situated 0.9 to 1.5 nm from the terminal amine of the γ-glutamyl side chain. Thus, the actual position of γ398/399 is most likely within 1.5 nm or less of the measured position of the Au11 cluster itself.
Au11 clusters in the middle region of the D domain were close to the point of emergence of the C-terminal region of the γ chain, 3.5 nm from the distal end of the molecule (27), suggesting that these γ chain C-terminal regions are aligned more-or-less perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the molecule, or possibly also fold or bend after they emerge from the D domain. Nevertheless, for the most part, those regions of the γ chain 4 nm or more from the distal end, also are oriented away from rather than toward the distal region of the molecule. Clusters situated at the distal end of the D domain (21% of the total) no doubt reflect γ chains that are oriented toward the far end of the molecule and/or that also bend somewhat from their point of origin in the middle of the γ subdomain (Fig. 4).
Incorporating Au11-Fibrinogen into Crosslinked Fibrinogen Fibrils.
We attempted to prepare crosslinked fibrinogen fibrils by adding factor XIIIa to Au11-fibrinogen or to unlabeled fibrinogen. In unlabeled fibrinogen crosslinking mixtures, we observed many typical examples of elongated double-stranded fibrinogen fibrils (not shown). In contrast, in Au11-fibrinogen crosslinking mixtures, most polymeric structures did not form the expected double-stranded fibrils, and thus their molecular organization was difficult to interpret. Occasionally, we found some short though interpretable protofibrillar structures (i.e., five to ten fibrinogen molecules), and when Au11-fibrinogen molecules were incorporated into these structures (Fig. 3, molecule 12), Au11 clusters were found in middle to proximal regions of the D domains, just as in monomeric fibrinogen molecules themselves.
The failure to incorporate Au11-fibrinogen into well organized two-stranded fibrils relates to the fact that reactive γ chain-crosslinking sites in fibrinogen are required for proper fibrinogen fibril formation (1). Because most of these sites had been used by the cadaverine labeling process itself, Au11-cadaverine-labeled fibrinogen molecules have a limited capacity to participate in fibril formation. In a sense, this negative result supports the basis for formation of crosslinked fibrinogen fibrils through transverse γXL site interactions.
Incorporating Au11-Labeled Fibrinogen into Fibrin.
We prepared fibrin clots under high ionic strength conditions favoring thin fibril formation, and we were able to find several fibrils into which one or more Au11-labeled fibrin molecules had been incorporated (Fig. 5). Gold clusters in these fibrils were located in middle to proximal regions of the D domains comprising the fibril DED complex. An occasional gold cluster was found in the E domain (1 of 8 incorporated clusters observed), but none was observed at the distal end of a D domain.
DISCUSSION
Solution NMR studies and analyses of “stabilized” crystals from the C-terminal regions of the γ chain indicate that this region can assume multiple conformations (27, 35–38) and that it can be ordered in different ways depending, for example, on whether or not the γ chain peptide is bound to the platelet fibrinogen receptor (38). This γ chain flexibility would also help to explain the formation of interfibrillar crosslinked γ trimers and γ tetramers, occurring in a setting of previously formed γ dimers (24) and is consistent with the fact that neither Yee et al. (27) nor Spraggon et al. (21) visualized this segment of the γ chain in their crystal structures. The idea that this region is flexible also is strongly suggested by our present observation that C-terminal γ chains are situated in several locations in the D domain ranging from distal to proximal.
The C-terminal region of the γ chain emerges 3.5 nm from the gly-pro-arg-pro-binding pocket at the distal end of the D domain (cf., Fig. 1) (27). Thus, gold clusters in proximal regions of the D domain of fibrinogen or fibrin and most proximal clusters in the middle region (i.e., >4 nm from the distal end) indicate the presence of terminal γ chains that are oriented toward the central E domain of fibrinogen (68% of the total), suitably situated between the strands of a fibrin fibril for transverse crosslinking to take place. The most proximally located clusters were 8.1–11.3 nm from the distal end of the D domain (34% of the total), indicating that γ chains in fibrinogen can extend further from their origin in the middle of the γ chain subdomain than was believed could plausibly occur based on measurements of D domain crystal structures (21, 27). Those gold clusters located 9.5 nm or more from the distal end of the molecule satisfy the distance requirement for two γ chains to be able to bridge transversely between γ406K of one chain and γ398/399Q of the other, notwithstanding an uncertainty of up to 1.5 nm regarding the location of the Au11 cluster relative to the γ398/399 position (Fig. 2). This point cannot be addressed directly because of our experimental design, which precludes crosslinking of cadaverine-labeled γ chains. However, the more relevant feature of middle and proximally situated Au11 clusters is that the γ chains to which they are attached are pointing away from the distal end of the molecule. This type of alignment is inconsistent with an end-to-end fibrin-crosslinking mechanism because distally oriented γ chains would be necessary for bridging to take place at adjacent ends of fibrin(ogen) molecules.
Yee et al. (27) suggested that transverse crosslinking is unlikely based on their calculation of the distance required for γ chains to reach halfway between the D domains from their emergence at γ392, 3.5 nm from the gly-pro-arg-binding pocket at the extreme end of the molecule. Spraggon et al. (17) used similar reasoning based on observations of a crosslinked D dimer fragment. Although they were unable to visualize the crosslinked γ chains in their D dimer fragment, it was nevertheless obvious that the crosslinked C-terminal γ chains traversed the abutting D domains and thus were oriented end-to-end. They extrapolated these observations on the D dimer fragment to include the presumed position of crosslinked γ chains in assembled fibrin polymers and thus concluded that transverse crosslinking in fibrin polymers was not possible.
Crystallographic studies have without doubt provided important details on the folding and conformation of the fibrinogen D domain, but the relationships that are found in these isolated D fragments, especially as they concern the location of the C-terminal regions of γ chains, are not likely to be the ones that most often exist in fibrin and fibrinogen fibrils. Certain factors that play an important role in fibrinogen and fibrin assembly that affect the position of the C-terminal regions of γ chains include the intramolecular spacing that exists between D and E domains in fibrinogen and fibrin and the noncovalent D:E:D intermolecular interactions that occur uniquely among fibrin molecules.
We believe that existing biochemical and ultrastructural evidence strongly support transverse γ chain crosslinking as a major crosslinking mechanism in fibrin. Our present observation that C-terminal regions of γ chains were sometimes found at the far ends of fibrinogen molecules, plus previous observations on the location of γ chains in fibrinogen dimers implies that end-to-end crosslink positioning between D domains also can occur. For example, end-to-end positioning is a virtual certainty as far as the crosslinked γ chains in the adjacent D domains of D dimers are concerned (21), including dimeric D domains in crosslinked D-fibrin-D complexes after dissociation with acetic acid (26). End-to-end γ chain arrangements probably also occur in end-to-end aligned fibrinogen dimers, such as were observed by Fowler et al. (20) or more recently by us (1). Other experimental systems by using fragment E (28) or a fragment E analog (29) as a template for assembling single-stranded fibrinogen fibrils also seem to favor formation of end-to-end crosslinks because they produce end-to-end fibrinogen alignments. However, side-to-side strand associations (i.e., double-stranded fibrils) also occurred commonly in images published by Veklich et al. (28). The occurrence of such fibrils under these conditions strongly suggests that transverse crosslinks also had formed, thus rendering ambiguous the hoped for extrapolation that γ chain crosslinking in fibrin is exclusively end-to-end. In summary, we conclude from this present report as well as from previously cited experiments, that transverse γ chain crosslinking predominates in assembled fibrinogen and fibrin fibrils. This event does not, however, preclude occasional end-to-end crosslinking within such assembled polymer structures, but that still remains to be shown directly.
Acknowledgments
Early phases of this study were supported by National Institutes of Health Grant HL-47000. These investigations also were supported by National Institutes of Health Grant RR-01777 and U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Health and Environmental Research. We are most grateful to Karen Higgins for graphic arts services.
ABBREVIATIONS
- STEM
scanning transmission electron microscopy
- Au11
undecagold-monoaminopropyl maleimide
- ATA
N-[(acetylthio) acetyl]
- HBS
Hepes-buffered saline
- TA
thioacetyl
References
- 1.Mosesson M W, Siebenlist K R, Hainfeld J F, Wall J S. J Struct Biol. 1995;115:88–101. doi: 10.1006/jsbi.1995.1033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chen R, Doolittle R F. Biochemistry. 1971;10:4486–4491. doi: 10.1021/bi00800a021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Doolittle R F, Chen R, Lau F. Biochem Biophys Res Comm. 1971;44:94–100. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(71)80163-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Purves L R, Purves M, Brandt W. Biochemistry. 1987;26:4640–4646. doi: 10.1021/bi00389a008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kloczewiak M, Timmons S, Hawiger J. Thromb Res. 1983;29:249–255. doi: 10.1016/0049-3848(83)90147-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hainfeld J F. Science. 1987;236:450–453. doi: 10.1126/science.3563522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wall J S, Hainfeld J F. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1986;15:355–376. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.15.060186.002035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Milligan R A, Whittaker M, Safer D. Nature (London) 1990;348:217–221. doi: 10.1038/348217a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wagenknecht T, Berkowitz J, Grassucci R, Timerman A P, Fleischer S. Biophys J. 1994;67:2286–2295. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80714-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gregori L, Hainfeld J F, Simon M N, Goldgaber D. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:58–62. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.1.58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zlotnick A, Cheng N, Stahl S J, Conway J F, Steven A C, Wingfield P T. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:9556–9561. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.18.9556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mosesson M W, Siebenlist K R, DiOrio J P, Hainfeld J F, Wall J S, Soria J, Soria C, Samama M. In: Fibrinogen and its Derivatives. Müller-Berghaus G, Scheefers-Borchel U, Selmayr E, Henschen A, editors. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science; 1986. pp. 3–15. [Google Scholar]
- 13.McKee P A, Mattock P, Hill R L. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1971;66:738–744. doi: 10.1073/pnas.66.3.738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kanaide H, Shainoff J R. J Lab Clin Med. 1975;85:574–597. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Samokhin G P, Lorand L. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:21827–21832. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.37.21827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sobel J H, Gawinowicz M A. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:19288–19297. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.32.19288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Matsuka Y V, Medved L V, Migliorini M M, Ingham K C. Biochemistry. 1996;35:5810–5816. doi: 10.1021/bi952294k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lorand L, Chenowith D, Gray A. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1972;202:155–171. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1972.tb16328.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mosesson M W, Amrani D L, Ménaché D. J Clin Invest. 1976;57:782–790. doi: 10.1172/JCI108337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Fowler W E, Erickson H P, Hantgan R R, McDonagh J, Hermans J. Science. 1981;211:287–289. doi: 10.1126/science.6108612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Spraggon G, Everse S J, Doolittle R F. Nature (London) 1997;389:455–462. doi: 10.1038/38947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Selmayr E, Thiel W, Müller-Berghaus G. Thromb Res. 1985;39:459–465. doi: 10.1016/0049-3848(85)90169-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Selmayr E, Deffner M, Bachmann L, Müller-Berghaus G. Biopolymers. 1988;27:1733–1748. doi: 10.1002/bip.360271104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mosesson M W, Siebenlist K R, Amrani D L, DiOrio J P. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989;86:1113–1117. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.4.1113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mosesson M W, Siebenlist K R, DiOrio J P, Matsuda M, Hainfeld J F, Wall J S. J Clin Invest. 1995;96:1053–1058. doi: 10.1172/JCI118091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Siebenlist K R, Meh D A, Wall J S, Hainfeld J F, Mosesson M W. Thromb Haemostasis. 1995;74:1113–1119. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Yee V C, Pratt K P, Coté H C F, Le Trong I, Chung D W, Davie E W, Stenkamp R E, Teller D C. Structure. 1997;5:125–138. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(97)00171-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Veklich Y, Ang E K, Lorand L, Weisel J W. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:1438–1442. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.4.1438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lorand L, Parameswaran K N, Murthy S N P. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:537–541. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.2.537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Mosesson M W, Sherry S. Biochemistry. 1966;5:2829–2835. doi: 10.1021/bi00873a008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mosesson M W, Galanakis D K, Finlayson J S. J Biol Chem. 1974;249:4656–4664. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Finlayson J S, Mosesson M W, Bronzert T J, Pisano J J. J Biol Chem. 1972;247:5220–5222. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lorand L, Gotoh T. Methods Enzymol. 1970;19:770–782. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Loewy A G, Dunathan K, Kriel R, Wolfinger H L., Jr J Biol Chem. 1961;236:2615–2633. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Mayo K H, Burke C, Lindon J H, Kloczewiak M. Biochemistry. 1990;29:3277–3286. doi: 10.1021/bi00465a019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Blumenstein M, Matsueda G R, Timmons S, Hawiger J. Biochemistry. 1992;31:10692–10698. doi: 10.1021/bi00159a008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Donahue J P, Patel H, Anderson W F, Hawiger J. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:12178–12182. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.25.12178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Mayo K H, Fan F, Beavers M P, Eckardt A, Keane P, Hoekstra W J, Andrade-Gordon P. Biochemistry. 1996;35:4434–4444. [Google Scholar]