Abstract
Natural killer T (NKT) lymphocytes are a unique subset of cells that play a role in regulating the immune system. For the past decade, studies have focused upon attempts to define these cells and to determine the ligand(s) that are required for their development and peripheral activation. Many research groups have focused upon determining the mechanisms for activating or inhibiting NKT cells in an attempt to control immune-mediated disorders as well as infectious and malignant conditions by using different ligand structures. Alpha-anomeric glycolipids and phospholipids derived from mammalian, bacterial, protozoan and plant species have been suggested as potential ligands for these lymphocytes. Some of these ligands were structured in forms that can bind to CD1d molecules. The lack of alpha-anomeric glycosphingolipids in mammals and the modest effect of these ligands in human studies, along with recent data from animal models and humans on the NKT-dependent immunomodulatory effect of beta-glycosphingolipids, suggest that the beta-anomeric ligands have the potential to be the endogenous NKT ligand.
Keywords: alpha galactosylceramide, beta glucosylceramide, CD1d, gaucher disease, glycosphingolipids, NKT cells
Natural killer T (NKT) cells
NKT cells are a unique T lymphocyte sublineage that have been implicated in the regulation of immune responses associated with a broad range of diseases, including autoimmunity, infectious diseases and cancer [1,2]. Given that low NKT cell numbers are associated with many different disease states, it is crucial to understand how they develop and become peripherally activated [2]. NKT cells differentiate from thymic precursors via signals emanating during T cell receptor (TCR) engagement by CD1d-expressing thymocytes [3]. These cells are reactive to the non-classical class I antigen-presenting molecule CD1d and recognize glycosphingolipid antigens, rather than peptides. The differentiation pathway of invariant natural killer T (iNKT) cells selected positively by CD1d molecules branches off from the pathway of mainstream thymocyte development at the double-positive (CD4+CD8+) stage [4]. It is, however, unclear whether a single ligand induces their peripheral activation. The exact definition of NKT cells is still subject to debate, and much of the misunderstanding arises from the different methods used for their isolation [5].
NKT cells play a role in the interface between innate and adaptive immunity, providing a powerful model to study the structural biology of glycolipid trafficking, processing and recognition [3]. They can either up- or down-regulate immune responses by promoting the secretion of T helper type 1 (Th1), Th2 or immune regulatory cytokines. They express a unique ability to suppress or enhance immunity, turning their manipulation into an attractive target for immunotherapy [1]. NKT cells also play a role in the differentiation of T regulatory (Treg) cells and in the induction of peripheral tolerance. These lymphocytes induce maturation of dendritic cells (DCs), promoting them to induce an antigen-specific T and B cell response [6]. Their function in anterior chamber-associated immune deviation, oral tolerance, other tolerance systems and autoimmune diseases has been decribed [7–10].
CD1d proteins
NKT cells recognize glycosphingolipids presented by the non-classical major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecule CD1d [11,12]. Antigens presented by CD1d have profound effects on the immune regulation of autoimmune, infectious and malignant disorders [13–15]. The CD1 family has a non-polar, hydrophobic antigen-binding groove that presents lipid antigens [16]. In humans, the CD1 family consists of the group I proteins, CDla, CDlb, CDlc and CDle, and the group II protein, CDld. Although rodents express only CDld, this single CD1 family member is able to acquire antigens in many subcellular compartments, as it is expressed broadly and traffics to all endosomal compartments [17]. While group I CD1 expression is limited to thymocytes and professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs), CD1d has a wider tissue distribution and can be found on many non-haematopoietic cells [11]. DCs and Vα14 iNKT cells recognize CD1d-associated glycosphingolipids (GSLs) via a semi-invariant TCR composed of an invariant Vα14-Jα18 chain that is paired preferentially with a restricted set of TCRβ chains [18].
The function of NKT cells is, therefore, dependent upon CD1d-restricted self and microbial antigen presentation and upon recognition of such antigens by an invariant T cell receptor on iNKT cells [19]. Analysis of the crystal structures and binding characteristics for an iNKT TCR with two CD1d-alpha-GalCer-specific Vbeta11+ TCRs that use different TCR Valpha chains showed the versatility of the TCR platform [20]. The structural and functional aspects of lipid presentation by CD1 molecules are therefore important in the context of the function of CD1-restricted T cells in anti-microbial responses, anti-tumour immunity and the regulation of tolerance and autoimmunity [21]. CD1d tetramers are used to monitor iNKT cell frequency, phenotype and lipid presentation by CD1d molecules [6]. This type of recognition is important for the cross-talk between NKT cells and DCs and for Treg promotion [6].
NKT plasticity
NKT cells have been shown to be remarkably versatile in function during various immune responses [22]. This subset of lymphocytes has diverse influences in various disease models and a unique ability to suppress or enhance immunity in different microenvironments [1]. The term ‘plasticity’ is sometimes used to describe their function. NKT plasticity may require a duality in function, such as a capability for both Th1 and Th2 cytokine secretion in different immune backgrounds. Whether or not this plasticity is mediated by a ligand still remains unclear. NKT plasticity may evolve from the use of different ligands or from different signals in the immune microenvironment [23]. The same ligand can generate different types of immune responses by NKT cells in different microenvironments. In light of the differing effects of a given ligand in vivo and in vitro, the net effect of NKT activation may not result from the binding of a single ligand, but rather from the sum of the effects of a variety of mediators [3,17]. It may also depend on cell–cell interaction or on the influence of cytokines or co-stimulatory molecules. The DC–NKT and/or NKT–Tregs cross-talk may be of importance in determining NKT plasticity [7,24,25]. Organ-specific factors also play a role in NKT plasticity, with different responses generated in different organs by an identical stimulus. Antigen presentation and APCs may play an important role under these conditions [26]. Originally identical stimuli may reach NKT cells via different pathways through presentation by different APCs [1,27]. On the other hand, plasticity may result from the natural programmes of different subsets of cells [28]. NKT cells are a heterogeneous population of lymphocytes that can differ in their CD1d reactivity and CD expression. Apart from inherent heterogeneity between different NKT populations, alterations in cellular membranes with altered lipid raft properties can affect raft-bound receptors, such as CD1d, and may add to the variety of responses [29,30]. Distinct NKT cell subsets have been suggested to play positive and negative regulatory roles and to define a new immunoregulatory axis, with broad implications for tumour immunity and other immunological and disease settings [31]. For NKT cells, it is unclear as yet whether their extensive functional capacities can be attributed to a single population that is sensitive to environmental cues or if functionally distinct NKT cell subpopulations exist [22]. Thus, NKT plasticity may be considered the result of several of the above-mentioned factors, with CD1d-dependent ligands being the final link in a chain of factors that determines the end response [30,32].
NKT ligands
The ligands for iNKT cells have been the subject of much research over the last decade. A number of ligands that can be presented by CD1d to NKT or other CD1d-restricted T cells have been identified, including glycolipids from a marine sponge, bacterial glycolipids, normal endogenous glycolipids, tumour-derived phospholipids and glycolipids and non-lipidic molecules [13]. Many of these agonists are being used as therapeutic agents to activate NKT cells in animal models and in early studies in cancer patients [33]. For peripheral NKT activation multiple classes of self-derived lipids, in addition to pathogen-derived lipids, appear to play a role [34].
The identification of physiologically relevant candidate ligands for positive selection or activation has proved technically challenging, however, due largely to the fact that the ligands for iNKT cells are lipids [34]. Studies have suggested that NKT cells die within hours of stimulation [12]. These results imply that their direct impact on the immune system is associated with an initial cytokine burst released before their death [12].
Ligand structures relate to their propensity to bind CD1d molecules and, as a consequence, alter the function of NKT cells [35]. To optimize NKT-based immunotherapy strategies, structural and kinetic analyses lead to the design of optimal NKT cell agonists [24].
Alpha-galactosylceramide (alpha-GalCer)
The alpha-anomericity of the carbohydrate is considered to be an important requisite for the CD1d-specific activation of NKT cells [36]. Characterization of NKT cells over recent years has been based upon their reactivity to the synthetic glycolipid alpha-GalCer in a CD1d-dependent manner [36]. Administration of alpha-GalCer is associated with potent activation of NKT cells, rapid and robust cytokine production and activation of a variety of cells of the innate and adaptive immune systems [37]. Administration of alpha-GalCer induces the secretion of both interleukin (IL)-4 and interferon (IFN)-γ. Repeated administration favours the production of Th2 cytokines [38,39]. In some mouse models of autoimmunity, NKT cell deficiency exacerbates disease, suggesting that NKT cells play a role in suppressing autoimmunity. Conversely, specific activation of NKT cells with alpha-GalCer generally protects mice against the development of autoimmunity [40]. Alpha-GalCer is generally more beneficial for treatment of Th1-mediated autoimmune diseases. However, alpha-GalCer treatment in mice was associated with detrimental side effects, and treatment efficacy was influenced by a variety of parameters, resulting occasionally in disease exacerbation rather than protection. Alpha-GalCer has also been shown to be hepatotoxic in mice, limiting its use in human testing [41].
Other synthetic glycosphingolipids
The biological activities of glycosphingolipids are highly variable, with minor changes in molecular structure. Synthesized glycosphingolipids provide insight into the various functional pathways associated with receptor binding of these ligands [42]. Sphingolipid analogues can be used in various systems: as anti-cancer agents, as probes of protein targets of bioactive lipids and of glycosphingolipid distribution in bilayers, as modulators of cholesterol-enriched microdomains that facilitate fusion of alphaviruses with membranes, as enhancers of membrane permeabilization induced by cholesterol-specific cytolysins and as probes for the selective internalization of glycosphingolipids in the caveolae of living mammalian cells [30,32,42].
Because NKT cells are attractive targets for the treatment of human autoimmune diseases, recent efforts have focused upon developing NKT cell agonists with superior treatment efficacy over alpha-GalCer [40]. OCH is the sphingosine-truncated derivative of alpha-GalCer and stimulates NKT cells to produce Th2 cytokines selectively. Administration of OCH suppressed autoimmune diseases, such as experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, diabetes in non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice and collagen-induced arthritis, by inducing Th2-biased T cells [38]. KRN 7000, an analogue with a di-unsaturated 20-carbon chain (C20:2), stimulates IL-4 production yet inhibits IFN-γ[43]. α-C-GalCer, a C-glycoside analogue, was reported to generate a longer-lasting reaction with a cleaner Th1 response [44,45]. A recent study evaluated 16 analogues of α-GalCer for the CD1-mediated TCR activation of naive human NKT cells and their anti-cancer efficacy [46].
Alterations in the degree of saturation, length of the lipid chain and sugar moieties are relevant for the GSL function. One example is the trans 4,5-unsaturation of the sphingosine backbone, which promotes closer packing and lower compressibility of ceramide analogues in the lipid–water interface relative to comparable saturated compounds[47]. Another is variation in the length of the long-chain base and in the structure of the carbohydrate-containing polar head group of (2S, 3R) (or D-erythro-)-β-lactosylceramide (LacCer), which may affect the mechanism of endocytic uptake from the plasma membrane [48].
Exogenous natural ligands
Glycosphingolipids and phospholipids with alpha-anomeric sugars attached to the lipid chain that are derived from mammalian, bacterial, protozoan and plant species have been identified as potential natural ligands for NKT cells [30,35,49]. NKT cells are activated during an infectious assault by the presentation of a neo-self glycolipid by the release of proinflammatory or anti-inflammatory cytokines by APCs, which can jump-start the immune system [30,50]. A dual recognition of self and microbial ligands was suggested to underline innate-like, anti-microbial functions that are mediated by the CD40L induction that is associated with massive cytokine release by NKT cells [47,51]. The Gram-negative, lipopolysaccharide-free bacterium Sphingomonas paucimobilis contains GSL [36]. Soluble CD1d-Ig dimers loaded with this lipid extract bind specifically to NKT cells, and the GSLs extracted from this bacterium are able to stimulate NKT cells in a CD1d-specific manner.
The semi-invariant αβTCRs can recognize isoglobotrihexosylceramide (iGb3), which is a mammalian glycosphingolipid, and a microbial α-glucuronylceramide, which is found in the cell walls of Gram-negative, lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-negative bacteria [52]. iGb3 is recognized by NKT cells under pathological conditions such as cancer and autoimmune disease [52,53]. Studies in mice that were deficient for iGb3 synthase revealed that these mice developed and reproduced normally. In addition, these mice had normal numbers of NKT cells in the thymus, spleen and liver [54]. Upon administration of α-galactosylceramide, activation of NKT cells and DCs was similar in iGb3S–/– and iGb3S+/– mice, which suggested that iGb3 is unlikely to be an endogenous CD1d lipid ligand that determines thymic NKT selection.
Several potential natural glycosphingolipids have been suggested to activate NKT cells. Potential activators include glycosphingolipids, such as glycosylphosphatidylinositol [13,30], isoglobotirhexosylceramide [55] and α-glucuronsylceramide [56,57], and phospholipids such as phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylinositol [58,59]. Not all are stimulatory, however, and some of these may even exert an inhibitory signal to NKT cells.
Beta-structured GSLs
There are few examples in nature in which the human body has receptors for antigens or ligands that do not exist in the body. Thus far, α-anomeric D-glycosylceramides have not been detected in mammals.
β-glucosylceramide (β-GC) is a naturally occurring glycolipid that is a metabolic intermediate in anabolic and catabolic glycosphingolipid pathways [33]. Its synthesis from ceramide is catalyzed by glucosylceramide synthase [30,32]. Beta-anomeric-structured glycosphingolipids are normal constituents of cell membranes [60,61]. In view of the lack of α-structured GSLs in mammals and the lack of a profound effect of alpha-anomeric compounds when tested in humans with cancers, recent studies have suggested that endogenous β-structured glycosphingolipids may be the potential endogenous ligands for NKT cells [32].
Gaucher's disease [62] is the most common glycolipid storage disorder, and is caused by the reduced activity of the lysosomal enzyme glucocerebrosidase. In this disease the substrate, β-glucosylceramide, accumulates in the cells of the reticuloendothelial system [63]. The decreased activity of glucosylceramide synthase also results in elevated serum β-GC levels [63]. Patients with Gaucher's disease have altered humoral and cellular immune profiles due, in part, to changes in cellular membrane properties [30]. There is circumstantial evidence indicating β-GC involvement in NKT cell regulation. Studies of patients with Gaucher's disease from Israel and Portugal showed an increase of NKT cells in the peripheral blood of these patients [64,65].
In vitro, treatment of NKT cells with β-GC decreases cell proliferation in the presence of DCs [66], and CD1d-bound β-GC inhibits NKT cell activation by α-GalCer [67]. Following its binding to CD1d, β-GC exerts a direct effect on NKT cells. It can also inhibit the α-GalCer-mediated activation [67]. Glucosylceramide synthase deficiency may also be associated with altered ligand presentation by CD1d [30].
β-galactosylceramide (β-GalCer)-deficient mice exhibit normal NKT development and function, and cells from these animals stimulate NKT hybridomas [68]. These hybridomas do not react to CD1d1 expressed by a β-GC-deficient cell line. Human β-GC synthase cDNA transfer restores recognition of the mutant cells expressing CD1d1 by Vα14Jα18 NKT hybridomas. Although suppression of β-GC synthesis inhibits antigen presentation to NKT cells, β-GC does not activate NKT hybridomas [68]. β-D-GalCer (C12) efficiently diminished the number of detectable NKT cells in vivo without inducing cytokine expression. Binding studies have demonstrated that both α-GalCer and β-D-GalCer are equally efficient in reducing the number of NKT cells [67].
β-glycosphingolipids exert a beneficial effect in several models of immune-mediated disorders and cancers, and their effect was reviewed recently in detail [69]. β-GC alleviates immunologically incongruous disorders and may be associated with the ‘fine tuning’ of the immune response by changes in the plasticity of NKT lymphocytes. β-GC alleviated concanavalin A (ConA)–NKT-mediated immune hepatitis in mice, which is an effect associated with a decreased serum level of IFN-γ and a reduced expression of the transcription factor signal transducer and activator of transcription-1 (STAT-1) [66]. The beneficial effect of β-GC was associated with a decrease in the number of intrahepatic NKT cells. β-GC generated a Th2 response that was associated with the alleviation of colitis in a murine Th1-mediated colitis model [70]. A significant amelioration of hepatic fibrosis was observed in β-GC-treated mice [71]. In contrast, in hepatocellular carcinoma-harbouring mice, β-GC resulted in a Th1 immune shift that was associated with the suppression of tumour growth and improved survival [70], which further supported the hypothesis that β-GC can alter the plasticity of NKT cells.
β-GC ameliorated graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in both Th1- and Th2-mediated murine models and affected the immune systems differentially in these incongruous models [27]. The beneficial effect of β-GC was associated with an increase in the intrahepatic : peripheral NKT lymphocyte ratio in the semi-allogeneic Th1-mediated acute model. This ratio, however, was decreased in the chronic Th2-mediated GVHD model. The administration of β-GC led to a decreased serum level of IFN-γ and an increased serum level of IL-4 in the Th1-mediated model, whereas this was reversed in the Th2-mediated model.
β-GC resulted in a significant amelioration in animal models for type 2 diabetes and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease [72–75]. A significant amelioration of the metabolic changes that are characteristic of leptin-deficient mice was observed: the liver size and hepatic fat content were decreased, glucose tolerance was nearly normalized and serum triglyceride levels were decreased. β-GC reduced pancreatic and liver steatosis and stimulated insulin secretion in the Cohen diabetes-sensitive rat, which is a lean model of non-insulin-resistant, nutritionally induced diabetes. β-GC increased the immune response against the hepatitis B virus in association with an altered distribution of NKT and CD8 cells, suggesting that β-GC could be used as a potent adjuvant for overcoming non-responsiveness to the hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccine, which may be NKT-dependent [76].
Several potential mechanisms of the NKT-dependent, immunomodulatory effect of β-glycosphingolipids were reviewed recently [69]. β-GSLs seem to affect NKT cells differently than does α-GalCer. In vitro, β-GSLs inhibit NKT cell proliferation without stimulating cytokine expression [66], and in vivo, β-GSLs exert an opposing effect on NKT cells in different microenvironments. Studies have shown that the immunomodulatory effect of β-GC is dependent upon DCs [24,66,77] and that β-GSLs can promote Tregs. This effect can be mediated via DCs or by direct cross-talk between NKT cells and Tregs[30,78]. The immunomodulatory effect of glucosylceramide can be associated with its role as an active ligand for NKT cells in a CD1d-dependent manner or via the displacement of an activating ligand from the MHC class I-like molecule, CD1d. Recent studies in animal models and in humans have shown that GC can promote Tregs via activation of DCs (Y. Ilan, unpublished data). β-GSLs may also affect NKT cells by the alteration of lipid rafts on cell membranes [79]. CD1d is localized to lipid rafts, and disruption of these lipid rafts can inhibit NKT activation without impairing CD1d-ligand binding [80]. Raft disruption has been shown to inhibit IL-6/STAT3 and IFN-γ/STAT1 signalling [81]. The administration of naturally occurring β-GSLs can alter lipid raft composition and structure, thereby affecting the intracellular signalling machinery [50,67].
Supporting human studies
Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) for patients with GD has proved effective in the management of the key disease manifestations, including a reduction in organomegaly, improvements in the blood counts and biochemical parameters, a decrease in bone-related pain and compensatory growth in children [82–87]. An increasing number of complications that are not associated directly with the known consequences of GD and that, paradoxically, may be related to the long-term use of ERT, have been reported.
The life expectancy of patients with GD type 1 (GD1) was evaluated by comparing the survival data from patients who were enrolled in the International Gaucher Registry (ICGG). The overall estimated life expectancy at birth for patients with GD1 was 9 years fewer than that estimated for the reference population [88]. The causes of death, however, could not be attributed to the glycolipid storage deficiency or to complications of GD that were seen typically in the pre-ERT era, such as bleeding or infections [89]. These observations have led to the notion that there is a reduction in the levels of β-GC that is caused by high dosages of ERT which, in turn, may have detrimental effects [90].
GD1 is associated with high resting energy expenditure, a low circulating adiponectin level and peripheral insulin resistance [91]. ERT may be associated with a decrease in resting energy expenditure. The prevalence of overweight individuals is lower in untreated GD patients than in the general population [91]. The prevalence of type 2 diabetes increases significantly with ERT, resulting in a comparable prevalence of type 2 diabetes among patients receiving ERT and the general population [91]. Long-term treatment with ERT results in a larger-than-average weight gain. The data suggest that a decrease in the serum level of GC has a deleterious effect on metabolic pathways that are associated with insulin resistance. Two recent reviews published in light of these data described the potent immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory and anti-malignant effects of GC and suggested that the long-term suppression of GC by ERT may impact the outcome of some patients with GD [69,90].
Based on the preclinical data suggesting that GC improves insulin resistance, hepatic steatosis and metabolic syndrome in animal models of diabetes and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) [73,74], the safety and efficacy of oral GC were studied recently in a clinical trial [92]. In an open-label phase I/II study, patients with liver biopsy-proven NASH were treated with oral GC for 24 weeks and followed for 16 additional weeks. No treatment-related adverse events were noted. Oral administration of GC led to reduced aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and gamma glutamyl transferase levels and to improved histological findings in liver biopsies of some of the patients. Serum haemoglobin A1C, the glucose tolerance test, triglycerides and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol also improved in some of the treated patients. The liver fat content, as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), was reduced [69]. An increase in the percentage of peripheral blood NKT cells was noted in some of the treated patients. The results of this preliminary study indicate that β-GC may be a promising treatment modality for patients with NKT-associated disorders [69].
Optimization of β-glycosphingolipids as NKT ligands: are there several endogenous ligands?
The above preclinical and clinical data, although implying that β-GC may be a natural endogenous ligand for NKT cells, does not rule out the option of other β-GSLs as additional ligands. Each of the different natural β-GSLs may be associated with different signals to NKT cells, and each may exert a different effect in different immune microenvironments. In fact, part of the plasticity of NKT cells described above may be related to the potential role of different natural ligands, β-GSLs, to alter NKT function in different directions. Alternatively, NKT plasticity may involve different subsets of cells being activated by different ligands from this family. Each of these cells may play a role in different diseases.
Recent studies determined methods to optimize the use of β-GSLs as ligands for NKT cells by using different natural β-GSLs (e.g. β-lactosylceramide), using different ratios of combinations of two natural β-GSLs (e.g. β-GC with β-lactosylceramide), and by altering the structure of the glucose moiety, the length of the lipid chain and the number of double bonds in the β-GC molecule [93]. The β-anomeric structure of the glycosphingolipid molecule, along with alteration of the carbon number in the acyl chain and the use of several combinations of β-analogues in different doses, was associated with an altered effect on lipid raft structure. This alteration was then followed by downstream effects on STAT signalling, which resulted in beneficial effects in models of NKT cell-dependent, immune-mediated, metabolic or malignant disorders [93].
A reduction of glycosphingolipids by the pharmacological inhibition of glucosylceramide synthase with atrial natriuretic peptide–dominant negative mutant (AMP–DNM) [94–97] or GENZ-123346 [98] was shown to improve insulin signalling and insulin resistance. Although this observation seems to be in contrast with part of the results presented above, it supports further the concept that β-GSLs are a family of immunomodulatory molecules. Blockage of an enzyme in the β-GSL pathway will decrease one compound and increase the levels of the other compounds in the chain, each of which may have a different effect on NKT cells. The glycosphingolipid composition of the cell membrane has an effect on the insulin receptor and the downstream signalling pathway. Alteration in insulin receptors by GSLs occurs via natural up-regulation of their biosynthesis. Glycosphingolipids modulate the activity of the insulin receptor negatively [99]. In obesity-driven insulin resistance, several factors contribute to the presence of excess GSLs in plasma membranes. Inhibition of the synthesis pathway for glycosphingolipids under these conditions restores the signalling capacity of the insulin receptor [29,100]. This effect may or may not be associated with a direct or indirect immunomodulatory effect of β-GC on NKT cells. Overall, the data support the hypothesis that alteration of β-GSLs exerts an effect on metabolic pathways, some of which may be mediated at least partially by NKT cells.
Summary
NKT cells remain enigmatic as to their identity, as do the ligands required for their development and peripheral activation. Much of the data relating to NKT cells over the last decade have been derived from the use of alpha-anomeric GSLs, which have been either natural or synthesized. The lack of these compounds in mammals, the fact that these compounds have only a modest effect in clinical trials, and recent data on β-GSLs generated in both animal models and humans suggest that beta-anomeric ligands may be the endogenous natural ligands for NKT cells. Approaches that use these compounds solely or in combination, or that introduce rationally designed β-glycosphingolipids to interfere with glycolipid metabolism, are attractive means for the development of NKT cell-based immune therapies.
Disclosure
YI receives consultancy fees from ENZO Therapeutics; Chiasma Pharmaceuticals; Member of the Scientific Advisory Board of Orammune.
References
- 1.Godfrey DI, Kronenberg M. Going both ways: immune regulation via CD1d-dependent NKT cells. J Clin Invest. 2004;114:1379–88. doi: 10.1172/JCI23594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Godfrey DI, Berzins SP. Control points in NKT-cell development. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7:505–18. doi: 10.1038/nri2116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bendelac A, Savage PB, Teyton L. The biology of NKT cells. Annu Rev Immunol. 2007;25:297–336. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.25.022106.141711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kronenberg M, Engel I. On the road: progress in finding the unique pathway of invariant NKT cell differentiation. Curr Opin Immunol. 2007;19:186–93. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2007.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Godfrey DI, MacDonald HR, Kronenberg M, Smyth MJ, Van Kaer L. NKT cells: what's in a name? Nat Rev Immunol. 2004;4:231–7. doi: 10.1038/nri1309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Stronge VS, Salio M, Jones EY, Cerundolo V. A closer look at CD1d molecules: new horizons in studying NKT cells. Trends Immunol. 2007;28:455–62. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2007.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Nowak M, Stein-Streilein J. Invariant NKT cells and tolerance. Int Rev Immunol. 2007;26:95–119. doi: 10.1080/08830180601070195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Menachem Y, Trop S, Kolker O, et al. Adoptive transfer of NK 1·1+ lymphocytes in immune-mediated colitis: a pro-inflammatory or a tolerizing subgroup of cells? Microbes Infect. 2005;7:825–35. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2005.03.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Shibolet O, Alper R, Zlotogarov L, et al. NKT and CD8 lymphocytes mediate suppression of hepatocellular carcinoma growth via tumor antigen-pulsed dendritic cells. Int J Cancer. 2003;106:236–43. doi: 10.1002/ijc.11201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Shibolet O, Alper R, Zolotarov L, et al. The role of intrahepatic CD8+ T cell trapping and NK1·1+ cells in liver-mediated immune regulation. Clin Immunol. 2004;111:82–92. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2003.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dougan SK, Kaser A, Blumberg RS. CD1 expression on antigen-presenting cells. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2007;314:113–41. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-69511-0_5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Crowe NY, Uldrich AP, Kyparissoudis K, et al. Glycolipid antigen drives rapid expansion and sustained cytokine production by NK T cells. J Immunol. 2003;171:4020–7. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.171.8.4020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Brutkiewicz RR. CD1d ligands: the good, the bad, and the ugly. J Immunol. 2006;177:769–75. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.2.769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Brutkiewicz RR, Lin Y, Cho S, Hwang YK, Sriram V, Roberts TJ. CD1d-mediated antigen presentation to natural killer T (NKT) cells. Crit Rev Immunol. 2003;23:403–19. doi: 10.1615/critrevimmunol.v23.i56.30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Van Kaer L. NKT cells: T lymphocytes with innate effector functions. Curr Opin Immunol. 2007;19:354–64. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2007.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Brigl M, Brenner MB. CD1: antigen presentation and T cell function. Annu Rev Immunol. 2004;22:817–90. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.22.012703.104608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bendelac A, Teyton L, Savage PB. Lipid presentation by CD1: the short and the long lipid story. Nat Immunol. 2002;3:421–2. doi: 10.1038/ni0502-421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Godfrey DI, Hammond KJ, Poulton LD, Smyth MJ, Baxter AG. NKT cells: facts, functions and fallacies. Immunol Today. 2000;21:573–83. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5699(00)01735-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lalioui L, Pellegrini E, Dramsi S, et al. The SrtA sortase of Streptococcus agalactiae is required for cell wall anchoring of proteins containing the LPXTG motif, for adhesion to epithelial cells, and for colonization of the mouse intestine. Infect Immun. 2005;73:3342–50. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.6.3342-3350.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gadola SD, Koch M, Marles-Wright J, et al. Structure and binding kinetics of three different human CD1d-alpha-galactosylceramide-specific T cell receptors. J Exp Med. 2006;203:699–710. doi: 10.1084/jem.20052369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Silk JD, Salio M, Brown J, Jones EY, Cerundolo V. Structural and functional aspects of lipid binding by CD1 molecules. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2008;24:369–95. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.24.110707.175359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Matsuda JL, Mallevaey T, Scott-Browne J, Gapin L. CD1d-restricted iNKT cells, the ‘Swiss-Army knife’ of the immune system. Curr Opin Immunol. 2008;20:358–68. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2008.03.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Rothenberg EV. Negotiation of the T lineage fate decision by transcription-factor interplay and microenvironmental signals. Immunity. 2007;26:690–702. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Cerundolo V, Silk JD, Masri SH, Salio M. Harnessing invariant NKT cells in vaccination strategies. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9:28–38. doi: 10.1038/nri2451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Fujii S, Shimizu K, Hemmi H, Steinman RM. Innate Valpha14(+) natural killer T cells mature dendritic cells, leading to strong adaptive immunity. Immunol Rev. 2007;220:183–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2007.00561.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Morel PA, Feili-Hariri M, Coates PT, Thomson AW. Dendritic cells, T cell tolerance and therapy of adverse immune reactions. Clin Exp Immunol. 2003;133:1–10. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2003.02161.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ilan Y, Ohana M, Pappo O, et al. Alleviation of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease in a murine model is associated with glucocerebroside-enhanced natural killer T lymphocyte plasticity. Transplantation. 2007;83:458–67. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000252783.66886.f3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Rothenberg EV, Dionne CJ. Lineage plasticity and commitment in T-cell development. Immunol Rev. 2002;187:96–115. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-065x.2002.18709.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lalazar G, Ben Ya'acov A, Lador A, et al. Modulation of intracellular machinery by beta-glycolipids is associated with alteration of NKT lipid rafts and amelioration of concanavalin-induced hepatitis. Mol Immunol. 2008;45:3517–25. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2008.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lencer WI, Delp C, Neutra MR, Madara JL. Mechanism of cholera toxin action on a polarized human intestinal epithelial cell line: role of vesicular traffic. J. Cell Biol. 1992;117:1197–209. doi: 10.1083/jcb.117.6.1197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Berzofsky JA, Terabe M. NKT cells in tumor immunity: opposing subsets define a new immunoregulatory axis. J Immunol. 2008;180:3627–35. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.6.3627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lalazar G, Preston S, Zigmond E, Ben Yaacov A, Ilan Y. Glycolipids as immune modulatory tools. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2006;6:1249–53. doi: 10.2174/138955706778742722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kronenberg M. Interview: glycolipid antigen presentation by CD1d and the therapeutic potential of NKT cell activation. J Vis Exp. 2007:635. doi: 10.3791/635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Speak AO, Cerundolo V, Platt FM. CD1d presentation of glycolipids. Immunol Cell Biol. 2008;86:588–97. doi: 10.1038/icb.2008.42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Tsuji M, Suzuki K, Kinoshita K, Fagarasan S. Dynamic interactions between bacteria and immune cells leading to intestinal IgA synthesis. Semin Immunol. 2008;20:59–66. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2007.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sriram V, Du W, Gervay-Hague J, Brutkiewicz RR. Cell wall glycosphingolipids of Sphingomonas paucimobilis are CD1d-specific ligands for NKT cells. Eur J Immunol. 2005;35:1692–701. doi: 10.1002/eji.200526157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Van Kaer L. Alpha-galactosylceramide therapy for autoimmune diseases: prospects and obstacles. Nat Rev Immunol. 2005;5:31–42. doi: 10.1038/nri1531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Miyake S, Yamamura T. Therapeutic potential of glycolipid ligands for natural killer (NK) T cells in the suppression of autoimmune diseases. Curr Drug Targets Immune Endocr Metabol Disord. 2005;5:315–22. doi: 10.2174/1568008054863772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Yamamura T, Miyamoto K, Illes Z, Pal E, Araki M, Miyake S. NKT cell-stimulating synthetic glycolipids as potential therapeutics for autoimmune disease. Curr Top Med Chem. 2004;4:561–7. doi: 10.2174/1568026043451221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wu L, Van Kaer L. Natural killer T cells and autoimmune disease. Curr Mol Med. 2009;9:4–14. doi: 10.2174/156652409787314534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Osman Y, Kawamura T, Naito T, et al. Activation of hepatic NKT cells and subsequent liver injury following administration of alpha-galactosylceramide. Eur J Immunol. 2000;30:1919–28. doi: 10.1002/1521-4141(200007)30:7<1919::AID-IMMU1919>3.0.CO;2-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Bittman R. The 2003 ASBMB–Avanti Award in Lipids address: applications of novel synthetic lipids to biological problems. Chem Phys Lipids. 2004;129:111–31. doi: 10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2004.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Yu KO, Im JS, Molano A, et al. Modulation of CD1d-restricted NKT cell responses by using N-acyl variants of alpha-galactosylceramides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:3383–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0407488102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Gonzalez-Aseguinolaza G, de Oliveira C, Tomaska M, et al. Alpha-galactosylceramide-activated Valpha 14 natural killer T cells mediate protection against murine malaria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:8461–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.15.8461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Gonzalez-Aseguinolaza G, Van Kaer L, Bergmann CC, et al. Natural killer T cell ligand alpha-galactosylceramide enhances protective immunity induced by malaria vaccines. J Exp Med. 2002;195:617–24. doi: 10.1084/jem.20011889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Chang YJ, Huang JR, Tsai YC, et al. Potent immune-modulating and anticancer effects of NKT cell stimulatory glycolipids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:10299–304. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0703824104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Skold M, Behar SM. Role of CD1d-restricted NKT cells in microbial immunity. Infect Immun. 2003;71:5447–55. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.10.5447-5455.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Singh RD, Puri V, Valiyaveettil JT, Marks DL, Bittman R, Pagano RE. Selective caveolin-1-dependent endocytosis of glycosphingolipids. Mol Biol Cell. 2003;14:3254–65. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E02-12-0809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Zajonc DM, Cantu C, 3rd, Mattner J, et al. Structure and function of a potent agonist for the semi-invariant natural killer T cell receptor. Nat Immunol. 2005;6:810–8. doi: 10.1038/ni1224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Stanic AK, Park JJ, Joyce S. Innate self recognition by an invariant, rearranged T-cell receptor and its immune consequences. Immunology. 2003;109:171–84. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2567.2003.01657.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Tupin E, Kinjo Y, Kronenberg M. The unique role of natural killer T cells in the response to microorganisms. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007;5:405–17. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Mougous JD, Cuff ME, Raunser S, et al. Locus of Pseudomonas aeruginosa encodes a protein secretion apparatus. Science. 2006;312:1526–30. doi: 10.1126/science.1128393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Macpherson AJ, McCoy KD, Johansen FE, Brandtzaeg P. The immune geography of IgA induction and function. Mucosal Immunol. 1:11–22. doi: 10.1038/mi.2007.6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Porubsky S, Speak AO, Luckow B, Cerundolo V, Platt FM, Grone HJ. Normal development and function of invariant natural killer T cells in mice with isoglobotrihexosylceramide (iGb3) deficiency. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:5977–82. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0611139104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Zhou X, Gao DQ, Michalski J, Benitez JA, Kaper JB. Induction of Interleukin-8 in T84 Cells by Vibrio cholerae. Infect Immun. 2004;72:389–97. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.1.389-397.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Kinjo Y, Kronenberg M. Valpha14i NKT cells are innate lymphocytes that participate in the immune response to diverse microbes. J Clin Immunol. 2005;25:522–33. doi: 10.1007/s10875-005-8064-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Mattner J, Debord KL, Ismail N, et al. Exogenous and endogenous glycolipid antigens activate NKT cells during microbial infections. Nature. 2005;434:525–9. doi: 10.1038/nature03408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.De Silva AD, Park JJ, Matsuki N, et al. Lipid protein interactions: the assembly of CD1d1 with cellular phospholipids occurs in the endoplasmic reticulum. J Immunol. 2002;168:723–33. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.168.2.723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Giabbai B, Sidobre S, Crispin MD, et al. Crystal structure of mouse CD1d bound to the self ligand phosphatidylcholine: a molecular basis for NKT cell activation. J Immunol. 2005;175:977–84. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.2.977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Goni FM, Alonso A. Biophysics of sphingolipids I. Membrane properties of sphingosine, ceramides and other simple sphingolipids. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1758:1902–21. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2006.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Sonnino S, Mauri L, Chigorno V, Prinetti A. Gangliosides as components of lipid membrane domains. Glycobiology. 2007;17:1R–13R. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwl052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Vergani D, Choudhuri K, Bogdanos DP, Mieli-Vergani G. Pathogenesis of autoimmune hepatitis. Clin Liver Dis. 2002;6:727–37. doi: 10.1016/s1089-3261(02)00018-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Apter FM, Lencer WI, Finkelstein RA, Mekalanos JJ, Neutra MR. Monoclonal immunoglobulin A antibodies directed against cholera toxin prevent the toxin-induced chloride secretory response and block toxin binding to epithelial cells in vitro. Infect Immun. 1993;61:5271–8. doi: 10.1128/iai.61.12.5271-5278.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Margalit MZL, Hemed N, Elstein D, Zimran A, Ilan Y. Glucocerebroside induces altered anti hepatitis C immunity in patients with Gaucher's disease. Hepatology. 2003;38(Suppl. 1):490A. [Google Scholar]
- 65.Baleria A. Impact of glycosphingolipid accumulation on the immunological phenotype: Gaucher disease as a model. 5th Interantional CD1d NKT meeting 2009. Abstract S3–8.
- 66.Margalit M, Ghazala SA, Alper R, et al. Glucocerebroside treatment ameliorates ConA hepatitis by inhibition of NKT lymphocytes. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2005;289:G917–25. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00105.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Ortaldo JR, Young HA, Winkler-Pickett RT, Bere EW, Jr, Murphy WJ, Wiltrout RH. Dissociation of NKT stimulation, cytokine induction, and NK activation in vivo by the use of distinct TCR-binding ceramides. J Immunol. 2004;172:943–53. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.2.943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Stanic AK, De Silva AD, Park JJ, et al. Defective presentation of the CD1d1-restricted natural Va14Ja18 NKT lymphocyte antigen caused by beta-D-glucosylceramide synthase deficiency. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:1849–54. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0430327100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Ilan Y, Elstein D, Zimran A. Glucocerebroside: an evolutionary advantage for patients with Gaucher disease and a new immunomodulatory agent. Immunol Cell Biol. 2009 doi: 10.1038/icb.2009.42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Zigmond E, Preston S, Pappo O, et al. Beta-glucosylceramide: a novel method for enhancement of natural killer T lymphoycte plasticity in murine models of immune-mediated disorders. Gut. 2007;56:82–9. doi: 10.1136/gut.2006.095497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Safadi R, Zigmond E, Pappo O, Shalev Z, Ilan Y. Amelioration of hepatic fibrosis via beta-glucosylceramide-mediated immune modulation is associated with altered CD8 and NKT lymphocyte distribution. Int Immunol. 2007;19:1021–9. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxm069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Rosenau J, Hooman N, Rifai K, et al. Hepatitis B virus immunization with an adjuvant containing vaccine after liver transplantation for hepatitis B-related disease: failure of humoral and cellular immune response. Transpl Int. 2006;19:828–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2006.00374.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Margalit M, Shalev Z, Pappo O, et al. Glucocerebroside ameliorates the metabolic syndrome in OB/OB mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2006;319:105–10. doi: 10.1124/jpet.106.104950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Zigmond E, Zangen SW, Pappo O, et al. beta}-Glycosphingolipids improve glucose intolerance and hepatic steatosis of the Cohen diabetic rat. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2009;296:E72–8. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.90634.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Tayer-Shiffman OZE, Pappo O, Sklair-Levy M, et al. Amelioration of hepatic steatosis and insulin resistance in psammomys obesus by a combination of beta-glycolipids is associated with STAT 1 and 4 expression. Hepatology. 2006;44(Suppl. 1):71A. [Google Scholar]
- 76.Mizrahi M, Lalazar G, Ben Ya'acov A, et al. Beta-glycoglycosphingolipid-induced augmentation of the anti-HBV immune response is associated with altered CD8 and NKT lymphocyte distribution: a novel adjuvant for HBV vaccination. Vaccine. 2008;26:2589–95. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.03.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Onoe K, Yanagawa Y, Minami K, Iijima N, Iwabuchi K. Th1 or Th2 balance regulated by interaction between dendritic cells and NKT cells. Immunol Res. 2007;38:319–32. doi: 10.1007/s12026-007-0011-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Yamamura T, Sakuishi K, Illes Z, Miyake S. Understanding the behavior of invariant NKT cells in autoimmune diseases. J Neuroimmunol. 2007;191:8–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2007.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Lalazar GPS, Lador A, Pappo O, Zolotarov L, Ilan Y. Alleviation of ConA immune mediated hepatitis via glycolipids: the role of beta versus alpha configuration in determining NKT lymphocyte distribution and the TH1/TH2 paradigm. J Hepatol. 2006;44:S237. [Google Scholar]
- 80.Park YK, Lee JW, Ko YG, Hong S, Park SH. Lipid rafts are required for efficient signal transduction by CD1d. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;327:1143–54. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.12.121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Sehgal PB. Plasma membrane rafts and chaperones in cytokine/STAT signaling. Acta Biochim Pol. 2003;50:583–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Wieland CW, Florquin S, Maris NA, et al. The MyD88-dependent, but not the MyD88-independent, pathway of TLR4 signaling is important in clearing nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae from the mouse lung. J Immunol. 2005;175:6042–9. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.9.6042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Butters TD, Dwek RA, Platt FM. New therapeutics for the treatment of glycosphingolipid lysosomal storage diseases. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2003;535:219–26. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0065-0_14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Charrow J. Enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher disease. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2009;9:121–31. doi: 10.1517/14712590802573395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Cox TM, Aerts JM, Belmatoug N, et al. Management of non-neuronopathic Gaucher disease with special reference to pregnancy, splenectomy, bisphosphonate therapy, use of biomarkers and bone disease monitoring. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2008;31:319–36. doi: 10.1007/s10545-008-0779-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Mehta A. Gaucher disease: unmet treatment needs. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 2008;97:83–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2008.00653.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Pastores GM, Weinreb NJ, Aerts H, et al. Therapeutic goals in the treatment of Gaucher disease. Semin Hematol. 2004;41:4–14. doi: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2004.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Weinreb NJ, Deegan P, Kacena KA, et al. Life expectancy in Gaucher disease type 1. Am J Hematol. 2008;83:896–900. doi: 10.1002/ajh.21305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Lee RE. The pathology of Gaucher disease. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1982;95:177–217. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Zimran A, Ilan Y, Elstein D. Enzyme replacement therapy for mild patients with Gaucher disease. Am J Hematol. 2009;84:202–4. doi: 10.1002/ajh.21369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Langeveld M, de Fost M, Aerts JM, Sauerwein HP, Hollak CE. Overweight, insulin resistance and type II diabetes in type I Gaucher disease patients in relation to enzyme replacement therapy. Blood Cell Mol Dis. 2008;40:428–32. doi: 10.1016/j.bcmd.2007.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Zigmond E, Papo O, Zangen S, et al. Treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis by B-glucosylceramide: a phase I/II clinical study. Hepatology. 2006;44:180A. [Google Scholar]
- 93.Lalazar G, Ben Ya'acov A, Livovsky DM, et al. Beta-glycoglycosphingolipid-induced alterations of the STAT signaling pathways are dependent on CD1d and the lipid raft protein flotillin-2. Am J Pathol. 2009;174:1390–9. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.080841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Halder G, Callaerts P, Gehring WJ. Induction of ectopic eyes by targeted expression of the eyeless gene in Drosophila. Science. 1995;267:1788–92. doi: 10.1126/science.7892602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Bijl N, Scheij S, Houten S, Boot RG, Groen AK, Aerts JM. The glucosylceramide synthase inhibitor N-(5-adamantane-1-yl-methoxy-pentyl)-deoxynojirimycin induces sterol regulatory element-binding protein-regulated gene expression and cholesterol synthesis in HepG2 cells. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2008;326:849–55. doi: 10.1124/jpet.108.139394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Bijl N, van Roomen CP, Triantis V, et al. Reduction of glycosphingolipid biosynthesis stimulates biliary lipid secretion in mice. Hepatology. 2009;49:637–45. doi: 10.1002/hep.22663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.van Eijk M, Aten J, Bijl N, et al. Reducing glycosphingolipid content in adipose tissue of obese mice restores insulin sensitivity, adipogenesis and reduces inflammation. PLoS One. 2009;4:e4723. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Zhao H, Przybylska M, Wu IH, et al. Inhibiting glycosphingolipid synthesis improves glycemic control and insulin sensitivity in animal models of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2007;56:1210–8. doi: 10.2337/db06-0719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Tagami S, Inokuchi Ji J, Kabayama K, et al. Ganglioside GM3 participates in the pathological conditions of insulin resistance. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:3085–92. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M103705200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Lalazar G, Ben Ya'acov A, Eliakim-Raz N, et al. beta}-Glycosphingolipids-mediated lipid raft alteration is associated with redistribution of NKT cells and increased intrahepatic CD8+ T lymphocyte trapping. J Lipid Res. 2008;49:1884–93. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M800113-JLR200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
