Abstract
The current review summarizes some of the key psychosocial issues related to prostate cancer both generally and for an older adult population. The review focuses on three main areas: (1) quality of life issues, (2) psychosocial implications and (3) treatment choices. More generally, the article presents information on the general background, screening guidelines, common side effects of treatment, and current psychiatric and psychological management strategies in prostate cancer. The article addresses the clinical approaches as well as the complexities that surface when deciding the treatment for patients with prostate cancer. Clinical and future implications are discussed.
Keywords: prostate cancer, treatment, psychiatric management
Introduction
Prostate cancer is the most common type of cancer in males in the United States, with an estimated 218,000 new cases and 27,000 deaths expected a year in recent years [1]. Approximately 70% of prostate cancer diagnoses occur in men over 65 years old [1]. Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in men, only second to lung cancer, and overall, cancer represents the second leading cause of death in men to heart disease. The psychological reactions to a prostate cancer diagnosis in a generally older population of men will depend on available supports, psychiatric history, and other significant life events such as a recent death of a spouse, divorce, entering dating situations as older men, retirement, or previously losing loved ones to cancer.
Screening Guidelines
American Cancer Society guidelines recommend a yearly digital rectal examination (DRE) along with an annual prostate specific antigen (PSA) test for men 50 years of age and older. Men who are at high risk, such as African-Americans or those with a strong family history of prostate cancer, are advised to begin testing starting at age 40. Routine screening PSA tests for younger men that have yielded cancer results, have led to heightened anxiety and confusion as there seems to be little consensus about the benefits vs. complication ratio for treatment in younger men. There are currently two large-scale, randomized trials underway in the United States and Great Britain (e.g. Prostate testing for cancer and Treatment; ProtecT) to determine if PSA screening is beneficial, however the results will not be known for many years.
Psychological Reactions to Diagnosis, Treatment Selection, and Treatment
Apart from the general worries of a new cancer diagnosis, there is still controversy about the selection of primary treatments for prostate cancer making the decision about treatment difficult. For early stage cancer, primary treatment options are radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy, and active surveillance, which can lead to differences in specific areas of functioning, such as sexual, urinary or bowel functioning over time [2, 3].
Because surgery and radiation treatments seem to be equally effective in treating early stage prostate cancer, controversy exists about selection of primary treatments for prostate cancer. Differences of professional opinion often make it difficult on the patients, creating uncertainty about their upcoming treatment and future prognosis. Active surveillance is often recommended for men over age 70 with significant co-morbid illness, low-grade indolent cancers, and less than ten years life expectancy [e.g. 4]. In men who are healthy enough to endure treatment, surgery (prostatectomy) has historically been thought of as the definitive treatment. Urologists typically will perform a “nerve-sparing” procedure that has decreased the rate of complications of impotence and urinary incontinence [5]. But even successful nerve sparing surgery does not guarantee sexual potency. Radiation therapy, either conventional or brachytherapy with seed implants, may yield less incidence of urinary leakage; however, there are more risks of urinary voiding difficulties with radiation treatments and difficulties with bowel function depending on factors of technique and total dose delivered [6]. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has decreased the incidence of local complications and has increased the ability to control these cancers [7]. For more advanced disease, hormonal manipulations are used to decrease the synthesis of testosterone which promotes prostate cancer cell growth. Today this is most often accomplished with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist medications such as leuprolide or goserelin, in conjunction with antiandrogenic agents that reduce production of testosterone in the adrenal glands, such as flutamide or bicalutamide. Chemotherapeutic agents are used for more advanced tumors as palliative measures.
Early treatment decisions are fraught with the sense of having to choose between quality of life and longevity, even though it is unclear what the outcome will be on either side of the balance [8]. Many men entertain multiple second opinions regarding their primary therapy, though this for some men adds to more confusion and distress because of the lack of agreement among practitioners. They often take in information from reasonable and reliable sources and any number of unverified sources on the internet. This amount of information can lead to significant anxiety while trying to make a reasonable treatment decision.
The side effects of the treatments and the medications used for prostate cancer, such as hormonal therapy, steroids, and pain medications, can cause distress as well. The side effects of hormonal therapies can be particularly distressing for otherwise asymptomatic men. These side effects include: hot flashes, osteoporosis, anemia, fatigue, sarcopenia, gynecomastia, loss of libido, erectile dysfunction, risk of diabetes, risk of cardiovascular disease and fatal cardiac events as well as possible emotional distress [9–13]. Recently, review articles discussing the side effects of androgen ablation therapy have stated that this treatment also impacts cognitive functioning [9, 11]. These side effect haves led to some oncologists to use intermittent hormonal therapy to decrease the morbidity of the therapy [14]. Psychiatrically, anxiety tends to be the most often experienced symptom for men with prostate cancer [15]. Many men may also report irritability or depression, and the leading predictor of depressive symptoms has been found to be a previous history of depression [16].
Though there may be considerable variations between the patients’ and urologists’ evaluation of performance status, pain, and pain relief [17], awareness and education about these problems as well as continued attempts to resolve them, or to cope better with them, can significantly reduce psychological stress [18].
Major Quality of Life Concerns
Sexuality
Erectile dysfunction, a complication feared by many men diagnosed with prostate cancer, can occur from aging, the cancer itself, surgery, radiation, and hormonal therapy [19]. After treatment men wonder if erectile dysfunction is prolonged, and WHEN or IF they will be able to have sex again. For those men who are particularly bothered by sexual dysfunction, the first step should be a consultation with an urologist who specializes in male sexual dysfunction [20]. Sex therapy with a trained therapist may help a man express the feelings engendered by this dysfunction, and also to help a couple learn alternative ways of sharing sexual intimacy [21].
Another confusing aspect for selecting treatment is the differential impact on erectile function in radical prostatectomy compared to radiation therapy. The data suggests even when the nerves are sparred during surgery, the nerves may take at least 18 to 24 months to fully heal [22]. This suggests that erectile dysfunction may be worse right after surgery and then possibly improve up to 2 years past surgery. Unfortunately, a wide variation in rates of erectile dysfunction following prostatectomy have been reported in the literature and range from 29 to 85% [23]. This range is due to the numerous ways sexual function has been assessed [5] and at what time point after surgery the men are assessed [24]. Despite the wide variation in rates of ED, the general conclusion from this literature is that radical prostatectomy has a severe impact on erectile function and the rates of ED are on the higher end of the range stated above. In a recent review, Dubbelman et al. [25] concluded that the ED rate after radical prostatectomy in the general urologic population is 81% [22]. The ED rates following a nerve sparing procedure also vary considerably due to the same reasons stated above; however more studies report a positive association between the number of intact neurovascular bundles and erectile function [22]. The rates of recovery of erections in men who had bilateral nerve-sparing surgery range from 31 to 86% [26, 27], while those who had unilateral nerve-sparing surgery report recovery of erections in 13 to 56% of the cases [27, 28].
Many patients believe that radiation therapy will have less of a negative impact on erections, and often times may choose radiation therapy over surgery as a way to preserve sexual function. The fact that erectile function is not present immediately after radiation treatment may lead to this belief. However, fibrosis continues to develop up to approximately 3 years past radiation and interferes with the neurovascular bundles and blood vessels adjacent to the prostate necessary for erections [29]. The decline in potency rates can been seen in data presented by Mantz et al [30] These authors noted the potency rates of 96%, 75%, 59% and 53% at 1, 20, 40 and 60 months after external beam radiation therapy. As a result, when you examine the data from 3 to 5 years post treatment the rates of ED are similar between the radiation and surgery groups [29]. Brachytherapy, or seed implants, also impact sexual function. Although there is some data suggesting the brachytherapy may have less of an impact in impotence rates, this data is still relatively limited. Brandeis et al noted that there was no difference at 3 to 17 months follow-up between brachytherapy and surgery [31]. However, reports presented from the CaPSURE database suggest that brachytherapy reported better sexual functioning as compared to surgery or external beam radiation at 3 to 4 years past treatment [32]. It is important to note that the brachytherapy patients still reported a significant decline in sexual function from their baseline scores.
Erectile Rehabilitation
One of the newer concepts in helping treat erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy is “Erectile Rehabilitation.” Initial data suggest that following radical prostatectomy men who achieve consistent erections have an increased chance of retaining erectile function when the nerves are fully healed at 18 to 24 months post-surgery [33, 34]. The mechanism of action for this result is believed to be consistent oxygenation of the penile tissue. In men following radical prostatectomy where spontaneous and nocturnal erectile function is poor or absent the penile tissue may fail to achieve proper oxygenation. As a result, permanent structural alterations may occur which is followed by the development of venous leak. Although debated, the current concept is that men post-radical prostatectomy should be treated with early postoperative erectile dysfunction therapy (i.e., pills, injections, vacuum device) in whatever form is successful and acceptable to the individual patient [35, 36, 37].
ED Treatments
The first line treatment for ED is one of the PDE-5 inhibitors, medications such as sildenafil (Viagra), tadalafil (Cialis), or vardenafil (Levitra), though these medications are quite variable in their erectile-enhancing effects in this population. For men post-radical prostatectomy, these medications may not become effective until the nerves heal 18 to 24 months post surgery. If these medications are not helpful, treatments such as penile injections, vacuum devices, or vasodilating tables (?) inserted into the urethra (i.e. Muse) may be effective treatment. If these treatments are not effective or satisfactory to the patient, penile implants are an effective option and most patients report very high satisfaction with this treatment [38]. In some men, hormonal therapy may decrease libido resulting in possible feelings of emasculation. Sometimes this lack of libido obviates the pressure to correct erectile dysfunction. However, this is not always the case. It is possible that men with on hormone therapy may still be interested in intercourse and thus these men may still require treatment for their ED [39].
Psychological and Relationship Implications
Although little, if any, data exists on the association between erectile dysfunction and depression specifically in men with prostate cancer, it is clear from studies conducted in other settings that there is a relationship between these two variables. Shabsigh and colleagues [40] (1998) found that the rate of depression was extremely high in men with ED (56%) and was significantly higher than in men in the control group with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) (21%) [40]. These results are supported by population-based studies that have also reported an association between depression and erectile dysfunction. Two population based studies with sample sizes over 1,700 both reported very similar findings [41, 42]. In men who range in age from 40 to 70, these researchers found a significant relationship between the presence of ED and depression (ORs ranging from 1.7 to 1.8).
It is likely that the presence of distress or depression related to erectile dysfunction may lead to relationship problems due to the increased stress on the couple. It is a common assumption that men are the ones who initiate sexual contact within a relationship. When a man experiences ED, he often pulls away from sexual contact and sexual intimacy. Many men report that there is no use starting sexual contact when they cannot “perform” sexually. Men state that engaging in a sexual experience reminds them of their “lack of manliness,” often times increasing their distress or depression over the loss of erections. This process leads to a lack of intimate contact in the relationship, which can lead to conflict and frustration. Preliminary data exists to support these clinical observations; studies have found the couples where the male partner reported ED also reported less intimate contact, and lower scores on togetherness and tenderness within the relationship [43, 44]
Urinary Incontinence and Bowel Changes
The fear of urine leaking, of smelling of urine, of bowel accidents and of having to use diapers is humiliating to many men. In fact, urinary incontinence has been rated a more bothersome outcome than ED [45]. Soon after prostatectomy men may worry “when will the urinary catheter come out and when will I stop leaking?” There are some men who begin to shun social contact. This social withdrawal is often mistaken for a major depression; this situation, however, if disregarded can lead to significant anxiety and depression which may then need to be treated by anxiolytics or antidepressants. Both supportive psychotherapy and cognitive behavioral therapy [46] can assist a man in coping with these changes in lifestyle. Specifically, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is a short-term, present-focused psychotherapy aimed at examining and altering distorted, maladaptive thoughts about oneself and their environment while supportive psychotherapy is a modality with less focus where more open-ended support is provided. In order to help men cope with this symptom it is important to identify the etiologies of incontinence and educate patients and families about this problem, and offer ideas to alleviate or reduce symptoms. Urinary incontinence can be alleviated with pelvic muscle re-education, bladder training, anticholinergic medications, and even artificial sphincter surgery [47].
Coping with Pain
Pain due to bone metastases is often a symptom of advanced prostate cancer. Older men are often reluctant to take pain medications or dosages adequate to alleviate their pain. It is not clear to what degree this relates to a fear of side effects, such as constipation and fatigue, or to a machismo attitude of feeling compelled to endure the pain. Support of the use of pain medications by the medical team as well as vigilant efforts to reduce or manage side effects can facilitate improved quality of life.
Fatigue
Symptoms of fatigue are particularly upsetting to men who have led active and independent lives. They usually result in increased dependence on family or friends, which are further reminders of the contrast with how they were before the cancer. Fatigue and lack of motivation can be caused by the illness, hormonal therapy, pain medication, steroids, chemotherapy and other factors. Counseling or psychotherapy can help the patient to reorganize his schedule and set realistic goals that may result in less distress. In some cases, a psychostimulant, such as methylphenidate (Ritalin) titrated from 5 mg per day in two divided doses early in the day, or modafinil (Provigil) titrated from 50–100 mg daily, may decrease fatigue, increase motivation, enhance appetite, elevate a patient’s mood and counter the sedating effects of opioids. If a depression is present, activating antidepressants such as fluoxetine (Prozac) or bupropion (Wellbutrin) can be used. Although seeming contradictory, exercise as also been proven effective for treatment fatigue in cancer patients. This research has not been conducted specifically in men with prostate cancer, however it would seem reasonable for a patient to try this approach. Hot Flashes:
In men, hot flashes are caused by many of the hormonal therapies, including orchiectomy [48]. Symptoms include: diaphoresis, feelings of intense heat, and chills, similar to symptoms that women have during menopause. At times, hormonal therapy must be stopped because of the drenching sweats and discomfort caused by hot flashes, especially when sleep is disturbed. This has led to a strategy of intermittent hormonal use to decrease the side effect burden. There have been anecdotal reports and small trials that suggest antidepressants, particularly the serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI’s), such as sertraline (Zoloft), and paroxetine (Paxil), or the serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI), such as venlafaxine (Effexor) to reduce the frequency and intensity of hot flashes [e.g. 49, 50]. Megace, a synthetic, antineoplastic and progestational drug., has also been found to be helpful [51]. It is not clear whether they relieve the distress of having the hot flash symptoms or work in some way to alleviate the flashes themselves. Changes in habits that stimulate onset of the hot flashes, such as decreasing caffeine, alcohol, and hot fluid intake may be useful.
Anxiety and PSA Hypervigilance
After treatment for prostate cancer or after a recurrence, many men become hypervigilant about their PSA tests, equating any change in their PSA test with “being a dead man.” This PSA anxiety [52, 53, 54] can lead to panic symptoms and insomnia, and may be relieved with education, support and anxiolytic medications if needed. Estimates of anxiety in men with prostate cancer have hovered around 33% [54], while depression has been estimated between 12 and 15%. Education about PSA levels as well as acknowledging some of the fears of what a rising PSA might mean, while recognizing how constant worry about the future negates the whole reason these men fear losing their lives, can help reduce this worry.
Psychological and Psychiatric Management
Men with prostate cancer respond to education and various kinds of brief psychotherapy, including supportive, cognitive-behavioral, and insight-oriented therapies. Unfortunately, some men are reluctant to participate in therapy, particularly if they hadn’t in the past [55]. Often men are more amenable to psychotherapy if the spouse or partner is present. This is often a good opportunity to work on issues that have become problems for the couple as well as the individual patient (e.g. [56]). There are also support groups available specifically for men with prostate cancer. National support groups available to men include “Us Too”, “Man to Man” and “Malecare”.
At a time when a couple’s communication needs to be at its best, it is often at its worst because of the stress of the situation. Some men tend to be uncomfortable sharing emotions. They often have a need to be seen as the protector and provider for the family, however incompatible this is with the reality of their physical deterioration. It has been noted that spouses suffer significant distress coping with their husbands’ prostate cancer [57, 58]. Family members are often concerned when they see the suffering and pain in their loved one; yet often feel powerless to change the course of events. Couple’s counseling can improve the ability of a couple to cope with the cancer together. Sexual and relationship issues are particularly bothersome for men who are single, divorced or widowed when they wonder if, how or when they should bring up the issue of their cancer or sexual difficulties on a date. Some men avoid dating altogether. Psychotherapy to address these issues and perhaps to rehearse different scenarios may help alleviate some of the fears these men have.
When psychiatric symptoms of depression and anxiety are severe, psychotropic medications can be effective and should be used with the general rule for geriatric patients: start low doses and titrate slowly. The SSRI’s are safe and well-tolerated and can alleviate depressive symptoms possibly resulting from hormonal therapy. Benzodiazepines and atypical neuroleptics are useful in treating symptoms of anxiety caused either by hormonal agents, or corticosteroid regimens.
Conclusion
Prostate cancer is affecting a larger proportion of our male population as detection methods are improving. The illness and treatments affect patients’ quality of life in multiple spheres. Issues such as sexual dysfunction, urinary incontinence, bowel changes, fatigue, pain, hot flashes, body image changes, and forced lifestyle changes lead to psychological distress. The PSA tumor marker that is used to follow treatment outcomes can be a significant source of anxiety.
Assessment of these problems is not easy, particularly in distinguishing between physical and psychological etiologies of distress. Discomfort and beliefs about stigma on the part of the patient, the family, and the health care provider in discussing these issues provide formidable barriers to evaluation and resolution of distress. Psychological and psychiatric interventions provide avenues for decreased stress and improved quality of living. Avoidance of these issues leads to increased suffering, significant psychological distress and feelings of despair, isolation, hopelessness, and passive thoughts of wanting to die.
Medical caregivers should have a low threshold for identification of these problems as well as referral to mental health practitioners. Once assessed, management of these areas would include a spectrum of psychologic and psychiatric interventions: education, support, individual and group psychotherapy, couples therapy, sex therapy, behavioral interventions, and psychotropic medications. These referrals may be facilitated by increased knowledge on the part of the patient, the oncology team and the mental health practitioner about the illness and treatment-specific stressors.
Future Perspective
As with all cancer, the treatments will continue to evolve and hopefully improve the long term outcomes for the patients. However, many of the advances in treatments will focus on improving quality-of-life concerns as well as improving survival rates. Many of the advances in treatments will not necessarily improve disease outcomes but will be implemented primarily to reduce the side effects of treatments, and institutions will push to “sell” these treatments based on the reduction of side effects. Examples of this include robotic surgery (which may or may not reduce side effects), more focused radiation therapy, and intermittent hormone therapy for late stage prostate cancer patients. We also believe the state-of-the-art treatment will provide more specialized services to help patients with the psychiatric issues and side effects of treatment for prostate cancer. These may include more mental health staff to help patients with the distress of the cancer diagnosis, and the fatigue and hot flashes associated with hormone therapy as well as specialists to help patients treat urinary incontinence, and erectile dysfunction.
References
- 1.ACS. American Cancer Society: Cancer facts and figures. 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Penson DF, Litwin MS. Quality of life after treatment for prostate cancer. Curr Urol Rep. 2003;4:185–95. doi: 10.1007/s11934-003-0068-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Potosky AL, Davis WW, Hoffman RM, Stanford JL, Stephenson RA, Penson DF, Harlan LC. Five-year outcomes after prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer: the prostate cancer outcomes study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;15;96(18):1358–67. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Klotz L. Active surveillance with selective delayed intervention is the way to manage ‘good risk’ prostate cancer. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2005 Mar;2(3):136–42. doi: 10.1038/ncpuro0124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Eastham JA. Surgery insight: optimizing open nerve-sparing radical prostatectory techniaues for improved outcomes. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2007 Oct;4(10):561–9. doi: 10.1038/ncpuro0916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Eton DT, Lepore SJ. Prostate cancer and health-related quality of life: A review of the literature. Psycho-Oncology. 2002;11:307–326. doi: 10.1002/pon.572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zelefsky MJ, Fuks Z, Hunt M, Yamada Y, Marion C, Ling CC, et al. High-dose intensity modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer: early toxicity and biochemical outcome in 772 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;53:1111–1116. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)02857-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chen RC, Clark JA, Manola J, Talcott JA. Treatment ‘mismatch’ in early prostate cancer: do treatment choices take patient quality of life into account? Cancer. 2007 doi: 10.1002/cncr.23138. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Holzbeierlein JM, Castle E, Thrasher JB. Complications of androgen deprivation therapy: prevention and treatment. Oncology (Huntington) 2004;18(3):303–9. discussion 10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Herr HW, O’Sullivan M. Quality of life of asymptomatic men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer on androgen deprivation therapy. Journal of Urology. 2000;163(6):1743–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Thompson CA, Shanafelt TD, Loprinzi CL. Andropause: symptom management for prostate cancer patients treated with hormonal ablation. Oncologist. 2003;8(5):474–87. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.8-5-474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Keating NL, O’Malley AJ, Smith MR. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease during androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(27):4448–56. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.2497. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=16983113. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 13.D’Amico AV, Denham JW, Crook J, Chen MH, Goldhaber SZ, Lamb DS, et al. Influence of androgen suppression therapy for prostate cancer on the frequency and timing of fatal myocardial infarctions. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(17):2420–5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.3369. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=17557956. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 14.Loblaw DA, Virgo KS, Nam R, Somerfield MR, Ben-Josef E, Mendelson DS, et al. Initial hormonal management of androgen-sensitive metastatic, recurrent, or progressive prostate cancer: 2006 update of an American Society of Clinical Oncology practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(12):1596–605. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.1949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Roth AJ, Kornblith AB, Batel-Copel L, Peabody E, Weingard K, Scher HI, Holland JC. Rapid screening for psychologic distress in men with prostate cancer: A pilot study. Cancer. 1998;82:1904–1908. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19980515)82:10<1904::aid-cncr13>3.0.co;2-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pirl WF, Siegel GI, Goode MJ, Smith MR. Depression in men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: a pilot study. Psychooncology. 2002;11:518–23. doi: 10.1002/pon.592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Litwin MS, Lubeck DP, Henning JM, et al. Differences in urologist and patient assessments of health related quality of life in men with prostate cancer: results of the CaPSURE database. J Urol. 1998;159:1988–92. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)63222-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ene KW, Nordberg G, Johansson FG, Sjostrom B. Pain, psychological distress and health-related quality of life at baseline and 3 months after radical prostatectory. BMC Nurs. 2006;1:5–8. doi: 10.1186/1472-6955-5-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bokhour BG, Clark JA, Inui TS, Silliman RA, Talcott TA. Sexuality after treatment for early prostate cancer: exploring the meanings of “erectile dysfunction”. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Oct;16(10):649–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2001.00832.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Penson D, Mclerran D, Feng Z, Li L, Albertsen P, Gilliland F, Hamilton A, Hoffman R, Stephenson R, Potosky A. 5-year urinary and sexual outcomes after radical prostatectomy: results from the prostate cancer outcomes study. J Urol. 173(5):1701–1705. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000154637.38262.3a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Schover LR, Fouladi RT, Warneke CL, Neese L, Klein EA, Zippe C, Kupelian PA. Seeking help for erectile dysfunction after treatment for prostate cancer. Arch Sex Behav. 2004 Oct;33(5):443–54. doi: 10.1023/B:ASEB.0000037425.31828.06. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Rabbani F, et al. Factors predicting recovery of erections after radical prostatectomy.[see comment] Journal of Urology. 2000;164(6):1929–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Schover LR, et al. Defining sexual outcomes after treatment for localized prostate carcinoma. Cancer. 2002;95(8):1773–85. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mulhall JP. Deciphering erectile dysfunction drug trials. Journal of Urology. 2003;170(2 Pt 1):353–8. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000063377.12281.57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Dubbelman YD, Dohle GR, Schroder FH. Sexual function before and after radical retropubic prostatectomy: A systematic review of prognostic indicators for a successful outcome. Eur Urol. 2006;50(4):711–8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.06.009. discussion 718–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Walsh PC. Radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer provides durable cancer control with excellent quality of life: a structured debate. J Urol. 2000;163(6):1802–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Geary ES, et al. Nerve sparing radical prostatectomy: a different view. J Urol. 1995;154(1):145–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tsujimura A, et al. Relation between erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence after nerve-sparing and non-nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Urol Int. 2004;73(1):31–5. doi: 10.1159/000078801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Potosky AL, et al. Five-year outcomes after prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer: the prostate cancer outcomes study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96(18):1358–67. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Mantz CA, et al. Potency probability following conformal megavoltage radiotherapy using conventional doses for localized prostate cancer. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. 1997;37(3):551–7. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(96)00555-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Brandeis JM, et al. Quality of life outcomes after brachytherapy for early stage prostate cancer. Journal of Urology. 2000;163(3):851–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Huang GJ, et al. Prostate Cancer Symposium. Orlando, FL: 2007. Predictors of HRQOL during long-term follow-up of men treated for prostate cancer. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Montorsi F, et al. Recovery of spontaneous erectile function after nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy with and without early intracavernous injections of alprostadil: results of a prospective, randomized trial.[see comment] Journal of Urology. 1997;158(4):1408–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Mulhall JP, et al. The use of an erectogenic pharmacothoerapy regimen following radical prostatectomy improves recovery of spontanious erectile function. Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2005 doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2005.00081_1.x. In Press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Mulhall JP. Deciphering erectile dysfunction drug trials. J Urol. 2003;170(2 Pt 1):353–8. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000063377.12281.57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Mulhall JP, et al. Erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy: hemodynamic profiles and their correlation with the recovery of erectile function. J Urol. 2002;167(3):1371–5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)65303-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.McCullough AR. Prevention and management of erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy. Urologic Clinics of North America. 2001;28(3):613–27. doi: 10.1016/s0094-0143(05)70166-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kava BR, Yang Y, Soloway CT. Efficacy and patient satisfaction associated with penile prosthesis revision surgery. J Sex Med. 2007 Mar;4(2):509–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00386.x. Epub 2006 Nov 6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Schover LR. Sexuality and fertility after cancer. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2005:523–7. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2005.1.523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Shabsigh RR, et al. Increased incidence of depressive symptoms in men with erectile dysfunction. Urology. 1998;52(5):848–52. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00292-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Araujo AAB, et al. The relationship between depressive symptoms and male erectile dysfunction: cross-sectional results from the Massachusetts Male Aging Study. Psychosomatic Medicine. 1998;60(4):458–65. doi: 10.1097/00006842-199807000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Nicolosi A, et al. A population study of the association between sexual function, sexual satisfaction and depressive symptoms in men. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2004;82(2):235–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2003.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Müller MJ, Ruof J, Graf-Morgentern M, Porst H, Benkert O. Quality of partnership in pateints with erectile dysfunction after sildenafil treatment. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2001 May;34(3):91–5. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-14277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Riley A, Riley E. Behavioural and clinical findings in couples where the man presents with erectile disorder: a retrospective study. Int J Clin Pract. 2000;54(4):220–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Krahn M, Ritvo P, Irvine J, Tomlinson G, Bremner KE, Bezjak A, Trachtenberg J, Naglie G. Patient and community preferences for outcomes in prostate cancer: implications for clinical policy. Med Care. 2003 Jan;41(1):153–64. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200301000-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Penedo FJ, Molton I, Dahn JR, Shen BJ, Kinsinger D, Traeger L, Siegel S, Schneiderman N, Antoni M. A randomized clinical trial of group-based cognitive-behavioral stress management in localized prostate cancer: development of stress management skills improves quality of life and benefit finding. Ann Behav Med. 2006 Jun;31(3):261–70. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm3103_8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Dorey G. A clinical overview of the treatment of post-prostatectory incontinence. Br J Nurs. 2007 Oct 25-Nov 7;16(19):1194–9. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2007.16.19.27357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Baum NH, Torti DC. Managing hot flashes in men being treated for prostate cancer. Geriatrics. 2007 Nov;62(11):18–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Barton D, Loprinzi CL. Making sense of the evidence regarding nonhormonal treatments for hot flashes. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2004;8:39–42. doi: 10.1188/04.CJON.39-42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Naoe M, Ogawa Y, Shichijo T, Fuji K, Fukagai T, Yoshida H. Pilot evaluation of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants in hot flash patients under androgen-deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2006;9(3):275–8. doi: 10.1038/sj.pcan.4500891. Epub 2006 Jun 20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Lajiness MJ. Megestrol acetate for the treatment of hot flashes in men undergoing hormone ablation therapy or orchiectomy. Urol Nurs. 2007 Dec;27(6):556–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Carlsson S, Aus G, Wessman C, Hugosson J. Anxiety associated with prostate cancer screening with special reference to men with a positive screening test (elevated PSA) - Results from a prospective, population-based, randomised study. Eur J Cancer. 2007 Sep;43(14):2109–16. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.06.002. Epub 2007 Jul 23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Roth AJ, Rosenfeld B, Kornblith AB, et al. The memorial anxiety scale for prostate cancer; validation of a new scale to measure anxiety in men with prostate cancer. Cancer. 2003;97:2910–2918. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Roth AJ, Kornblith AB, Batel-Copel L, Peabody E, Weingard K, Scher HI, Holland JC. Rapid screening for psychological distress in men with prostate cancer: A pilot study. Cancer. 1998;82:1904–8. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19980515)82:10<1904::aid-cncr13>3.0.co;2-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Nelson CJ, Rosenfeld S, Roth AJ. Coping with your diagnosis and moving forward, in American Cancer Society Health Promotions. In: Bostwick DG, Crawford ED, Higano CS, Roach M, editors. American Cancer Society’s Complete Guide to Prostate Cancer. Atlanta, GA: 2005. pp. 81–88. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Canada AL, Neese LE, Sui D, Schover LR. Pilot intervention to enhance sexual rehabilitation for couples after treatment for localized prostate carcinoma. Cancer. 2005 Dec 15;104(12):2689–700. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Boehmer U, Clark JA. Communication about prostate cancer between men and their wives. J Fam Pract. 2001 Mar;50(3):226–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Kornblith AB, Herr HW, Ofman US, et al. Quality of life of patients with prostate cancer and their spouses: The value of a database in clinical care. Cancer. 1994;73:2791–2802. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19940601)73:11<2791::aid-cncr2820731123>3.0.co;2-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]