Skip to main content
Human Molecular Genetics logoLink to Human Molecular Genetics
. 2009 Nov 11;19(2):299–312. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddp497

Fibroblast phenotype in male carriers of FMR1 premutation alleles

Dolores Garcia-Arocena 1, Jane E Yang 1, Judith R Brouwer 3, Flora Tassone 1,4, Christine Iwahashi 1, Elizabeth M Berry-Kravis 7, Christopher G Goetz 8, Allison M Sumis 9, Lili Zhou 9, Danh V Nguyen 2, Luis Campos 2, Erin Howell 1, Anna Ludwig 1, Claudia Greco 5, Rob Willemsen 3, Randi J Hagerman 4,6, Paul J Hagerman 1,4,*
PMCID: PMC2796892  PMID: 19864489

Abstract

Fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS) is an adult-onset neurodegenerative disorder among carriers of premutation expansions (55–200 CGG repeats) of the fragile X mental retardation 1 (FMR1) gene. The clinical features of FXTAS, as well as various forms of clinical involvement in carriers without FXTAS, are thought to arise through a direct toxic gain of function of high levels of FMR1 mRNA containing the expanded CGG repeat. Here we report a cellular endophenotype involving increased stress response (HSP27, HSP70 and CRYAB) and altered lamin A/C expression/organization in cultured skin fibroblasts from 11 male carriers of premutation alleles of the FMR1 gene, including six patients with FXTAS and five premutation carriers with no clinical evidence of FXTAS, compared with six controls. A similar abnormal cellular phenotype was found in CNS tissue from 10 patients with FXTAS. Finally, there is an analogous abnormal cellular distribution of lamin A/C isoforms in knock-in mice bearing the expanded CGG repeat in the murine Fmr1 gene. These alterations are evident even in mouse embryonic fibroblasts, raising the possibility that, in humans, the expanded-repeat mRNA triggers pathogenic mechanisms early in development, thus providing a molecular basis for the neurodevelopmental abnormalities observed in some children and clinical symptoms in some adults who are carriers of premutation FMR1 alleles. Cellular dysregulation in fibroblasts represents a novel and highly advantageous model for investigating disease pathogenesis in premutation carriers and for quantifying and monitoring disease progression. Fibroblast studies may also prove useful in screening and testing the efficacy of therapeutic interventions.

INTRODUCTION

Individuals who are carriers of premutation CGG-repeat expansions of the fragile X mental retardation 1 (FMR1) gene (55–200 CGG repeats), although originally thought to be clinically uninvolved, are now known to experience a range of clinical phenotypes, including (i) the neurodegenerative disorder, fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS), seen in older adult carriers of the premutation (recent reviews on FXTAS: 1,24); (ii) developmental disorders occasionally seen in children with the premutation (58); (iii) neuropsychological deficits in adults without FXTAS (913); (iv) emotional difficulties including depression, anxiety and obsessive compulsive features (1416); (v) loss of reproductive function in adult women (17,18) and (vi) autoimmune disorders in women including fibromyalgia and hypothyroidism (19). Many of these clinical features are thought to arise as a consequence of toxicity of the elevated levels of the expanded CGG-repeat FMR1 mRNA (20,21).

The principal features of FXTAS are action tremor and gait ataxia with associated, more variable features that include cognitive decline with disinhibition and executive function deficits, mild parkinsonism, peripheral neuropathy and autonomic dysfunction (2128). The neuropathology of FXTAS includes significant white matter disease, spongiosis in both the cerebrum and cerebellum, prominent sub-cortical astroglial activation, Purkinje cell loss in the cerebellum and the presence of eosinophilic, intranuclear inclusions in neurons and astrocytes throughout the cortex, subcortical regions and brainstem (but rarely present in cerebellar Purkinje cells) (29,30). Studies of the composition of isolated inclusions reveal the presence of at least 30 proteins (31), including ubiquitin, stress response proteins and cytoskeletal proteins. Importantly, the inclusions contain FMR1 mRNA (32), in agreement with the proposed RNA-toxicity model for FXTAS (21,30,33,34) wherein the expanded CGG-repeat RNA itself triggers the pathogenic process leading to FXTAS.

Among the proteins present in the inclusions are at least three RNA binding proteins, hnRNP A2, MBNL1 and purα (35). Although there is no evidence of functional importance for these proteins in FXTAS pathogenesis, the work of Jin et al. (35) in Drosophila suggests that the CGG-induced neurodegenerative phenotype can be rescued by overexpression of purα. Similarly, Sofola et al. (36) demonstrated at least partial rescue of an eye phenotype in Drosophila upon overexpression of hnRNP A2. We have previously reported the disruption of the nuclear lamin A/C architecture and the activation of the heat-shock protein (HSP) αB-crystallin in cultured neural cells expressing expanded CGG repeats (31,37). In the current report, we examine cultured skin fibroblasts from male premutation carriers with and without FXTAS clinical symptoms and study molecular parallels with findings in CNS tissue derived from 10 male post-mortem cases with FXTAS. In both tissues, we observe transcriptional upregulation of FMR1, LMNA and stress response genes. Protein products of the LMNA gene (OMIM*150330), principally the two isoforms lamin A and C (lamin A/C), provide a protein matrix juxtaposed to the inner nuclear membrane that is thought to stabilize the structure of the nuclear compartment. Lamin A/C also influences chromatin organization, indirectly affecting gene expression (38). On the basis of this observation, our current report studies putative alterations of the characteristic ring-like nuclear lamin A/C architecture in both fixed and cultured skin fibroblasts derived from skin biopsies of subjects with FMR1 premutations. Finally, we study the transcription patterns of several cellular stress response genes in both skin fibroblasts from premutation carriers and brain tissue samples derived from subjects with FXTAS, compared with controls. On the basis of the results of these four experimental approaches, we consider skin fibroblasts, derived from the same germ layer (ectoderm) as neural cells of the CNS, as a powerful and easily accessible cell model to study the key events in the cellular pathogenesis of diseases associated with expanded CGG repeats.

RESULTS

Human skin fibroblasts from patients with FXTAS reveal altered lamin A/C nuclear architecture

A striking cytoarchitectural finding in cultured neural (SK) cells harboring expanded CGG-repeat plasmids is the collapse of the normal nuclear lamin ring morphology (37). Such changes have also been observed in fibroblasts from certain laminopathies, even under conditions where there is no evident clinical (skin) phenotype (3944), raising the possibility that one or more features of such cellular phenotypes in FXTAS could also be present in a peripheral cell type from patients with FXTAS. To examine this possibility, we performed molecular studies on a panel of six controls, six FXTAS and five asymptomatic premutation carrier fibroblast cell lines (Table 1).

Table 1.

Cultured fibroblast samples derived from male subjects

Phenotype EXP ID Gender Agea CGG repeatsb FXTAS scorec FXTAS staged
Control C1 M 60 31 0 0
C2 M 75 21 0 0
C3 M 57 30 0 0
C4 M 87 22 0 0
C5 M 65 30 0 0
C6 M 58 22 0 0
Asymptomatic carriers P1 M 67 67 4 0
P2 M 69 74 8 0
P3 M 68 81 9 0
P4 M 71 70 16 0
P5 M 76 67 20 0
FXTAS F1 M 71 122 55 3–4
F2 M 70 105 45 4
F3 M 60 97 59 3
F4 M 75 98, 113 136 5
F5 M 81 78 48 4
F6 M 61 95 49 3

aAge at skin biopsy.

bIn cultured fibroblasts.

cFXTAS Rating Scale for major motor features in subjects who underwent videotaping sessions. The ranges for subdomains scored are: Tremor (0–53), ataxia (0–73) and parkinsonism (0–100) (1).

dBourgeois et al.(16) and Hagerman et al. (21).

We examined the lamin A/C architecture by in situ immunofluorescent staining initially in dermal fibroblasts from fixed skin biopsies from a subject carrying 107 CGG repeats (nominal value based on peripheral blood lymphocytes) who was diagnosed with severe FXTAS (clinical stage 5), compared with an age-matched control male with 21 CGG repeats (F4 and C2, respectively; Table 1). Analysis of the control skin biopsy revealed a uniform lamin A/C staining in most of the nuclei, with a heavier ring-like pattern at the nuclear periphery. In contrast, the case with severe FXTAS displayed overall reduced intensity of lamin A/C staining and lack of the characteristic ring-like distribution of lamin A/C around the nuclei (Fig. 1A and B).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Immunofluorescence microscopy reveals that cells from a fixed skin biopsy and from cultured fibroblasts derived from patient F4 with severe FXTAS, clinical stage 5, (A and B, lower panels), have decreased expression of lamin A/C protein compared with those of an age-matched control subject, C2 (A and B, upper panels). (A) Tissue biopsy of subject F4 displays a lack of the typical ring-like distribution of lamin A/C protein (green) and abnormal morphology of the nuclei counterstained with DAPI (blue), in comparison to C2 (magnification ×400). (B) Cultured skin fibroblasts were stained with anti-lamin A/C (green) and anti-beta tubulin (red) antibodies to define the contour of the cells. Control fibroblasts derived from C2 display normal ring-like lamin A/C architecture (upper panel); whereas fibroblasts derived from F4 (lower panel) exhibit distorted lamin A/C organization and overall decreased staining (magnification ×800). Arrows indicate uneven distribution of lamin A/C; arrowheads indicate non-fusiform fibroblasts and abnormal morphology of the nuclei. (C) Dot plot representing the percentage of skin fibroblasts with complete lamin A/C rings in cultured fibroblasts derived from five premutation carriers with no clinical signs of FXTAS (asymptomatic; Asymp Pre) and six subjects with FXTAS (black dots, premutation carriers) compared with six age-matched controls (white dots) described in Table 1. Horizontal lines represent the mean value per phenotypic group.

Further, to assess the altered lamin A/C architecture in dermal fibroblasts from patients with FXTAS, we cultured fibroblasts from skin biopsies and analyzed the percent of (undisrupted) lamin A/C rings in cells derived from six controls and six subjects with FXTAS (Supplementary Material, Fig. S1). We performed 2–6 technical replicates per subject with the majority involving three replicates. The mean fraction of complete lamin rings in the group of subjects with FXTAS was reduced from 77.44 ± 5.99% (controls) to 35.19 ± 5.65% (FXTAS) (P < 0.01) (Fig. 1C). Similar results are observed for lamin A/C architecture in fibroblasts derived from patients with FXTAS and from controls, regardless of whether fetal bovine serum was present in or absent from the cell culture media. In fact, asynchronized cultured fibroblasts from patients with FXTAS display a more significant reduction in the percentage of cells displaying normal ring-like organization of lamin A/C, compared with controls (data not shown). However, neither LMNA mRNA (Supplementary Material, Table S2A and B) nor protein levels were significantly altered in the fibroblast cultures compared with controls. We did not observe intranuclear inclusions in our panel of cultured fibroblast lines using antibodies directed to lamin A/C (0/4731 cells).

The mean CGG-repeat number in the control group was 26.2 ± 5.0. In the groups of premutation carriers with FXTAS and those without FXTAS, the mean number of CGG repeats was 100.1 ± 14.7 and 71.8 ± 5.9, respectively (P = 0.0002). As expected, FMR1 mRNA levels were significantly elevated in both groups of premutation carriers: FXTAS and asymptomatic carriers collectively over-expressed FMR1 mRNA by 2.58 ± 1.15-fold (P < 0.01) compared with controls. Interestingly, although the average expression of FMR1 mRNA is higher in premutation carriers with FXTAS relative to carriers with no clinical involvement, this difference was not statistically significant (Fig. 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Box plots demonstrating elevated mRNAs for FMR1 and three HSPs relative to GUS in cultured fibroblasts from carriers of FMR1 premutation alleles relative to controls. The sample groups are controls (C), premutation carriers with FXTAS (F) and asymptomatic premutation carriers (AsP). Genes are as indicated: FMR1, CRYAB, HSP27, HSP70 (upper and middle panels). The levels of mRNA expression of control genes JUNB and TSC2 are displayed in the lower panels. We found no significant differences in the mRNA levels of JUNB and TSC2 relative to GUS among the three groups of subjects considered in this study (neither intra-subject nor inter-subject variability). The horizontal box lines are 25, 50 (median) and 75% of the distribution with whiskers marking 1.5 times the interquartile range. The ‘+’ symbol indicates the mean of the distribution. Open circles indicate potential outliers (in CRYAB—control group and HSP70—non-FXTAS group). The results of our analysis with or without these two data points (outliers) do not differ.

Human skin fibroblasts from patients with FXTAS show increased mRNA levels of heat-shock genes, αB-crystallin, HSP27 and HSP70

To determine whether there is transcriptional upregulation of the stress response genes, CRYAB, HSP27 and HSP70, in fibroblast cultures corresponding to their accumulation in intranuclear inclusions in frontal cortex tissue of patients who died with FXTAS (31), we quantified the levels of these mRNAs in the panel of fibroblast cell lines (Table 1). We found that the HSP mRNAs from premutation carriers were all upregulated with respect to controls (Fig. 2 and Table 2). Similar results are observed for mRNA levels in fibroblasts derived from patients with FXTAS and from controls, regardless of whether the cells were synchronized or not (data not shown). As additional controls for the RT–PCR method, and in particular for the integrity of the RNA samples, we quantified the mRNA expression levels of two mRNAs, coding for tuberin (TSC2) and oncogene Jun-B (JUNB), that were not expected to be influenced by FMR1 gene expression. Neither of these control mRNAs was overexpressed in the panel of premutation carriers compared with controls (Fig. 2). Moreover, unlike the greater variation in FMR1 and HSP mRNA levels in the premutation subgroups, there was no increase in variation for either JUNB or TSC2 (see Discussion section).

Table 2.

Increased steady state mRNA levels of FMR1 and of stress response genes in cultured skin fibroblasts from premutation carriers relative to controls

Relative mRNA levels Asymptomatic carriersa
Carriers with FXTAS
Meanb (SD) P-value Meanc (SD) P-value
FMR1 2.25 (1.05) <0.01* 2.95 (1.19) <0.01*
CRYAB 5.89 (7.09) <0.01* 5.70 (5.60) <0.01*
HSP70 1.71 (0.54) <0.01* 1.88 (0.54) <0.01*
HSP27 2.07 (0.87) 0.022* 2.45 (0.98) <0.01*
JUNB 0.99 (0.22) >0.95 1.02 (0.14) >0.89
TSC2 1.13 (0.17) >0.36 1.16 (0.34) >0.38

aCarriers of premutation FMR1 alleles.

bMean values of asymptomatic premutation cases relative to the normalized control mean values of 1.0.

cMean values of FXTAS cases relative to the normalized control mean values of 1.0.

*Significant at level P < 0.05.

Western blot analysis of the panel of fibroblast cell lines showed no significant increases in αB-crystallin, HSP27 or HSP70 protein levels in total cell, enriched cytoplasmic or nuclear protein extracts from subjects with FXTAS compared with controls (P > 0.05). We found no intranuclear inclusions after immunostaining cultured fibroblast lines from three subjects with FXTAS (F4, F5, F6, Table 1), including a patient with FXTAS clinical stage 5, using antibodies directed to αB-crystallin, HSP27, HSP70 and ubiquitin proteins typically found in FXTAS subjects with intranuclear inclusions in brain.

Cultured skin fibroblasts from asymptomatic premutation carriers display features of molecular dysregulation similar to those observed in patients with FXTAS

As noted above, FMR1 mRNA levels were significantly elevated in fibroblasts from five premutation carriers without the core features (intention tremor, gait ataxia) of FXTAS, relative to six controls described in Table 1. This pattern of overexpression among groups of premutation carriers (six FXTAS, five asymptomatic carriers and both groups combined) is also observed for mRNA levels of all HSPs considered in this study (Table 2). However, we found no significant differences in mRNA levels of these four genes between FXTAS and asymptomatic premutation groups (Fig. 2). No significant differences in the levels of these proteins were observed for FXTAS or asymptomatic premutation carrier groups relative to controls.

Analyses of immunofluorescent staining of cultured skin fibroblasts from five asymptomatic premutation carriers with an antibody directed to lamin A/C also revealed an unexpected mean reduction (36.58%) in the percent of cells displaying normal lamin A/C rings relative to controls. Asymptomatic premutation carriers had 49.1 ± 6.6% normal lamin A/C rings (P < 0.01) relative to the control group (77.4 ± 6.0% normal lamin A/C rings). Although the group of fibroblasts derived from subjects with FXTAS displayed a 28.3% reduction in the number of normal lamin rings relative to the asymptomatic premutation group, this difference was not significant (P = 0.13; Fig. 1C).

CNS tissue from a panel of 10 patients with FXTAS reveals elevated LMNA mRNA levels

To quantify the post-mortem FMR1 mRNA levels in frontal cortex samples of patients with FXTAS, a panel of 10 male subjects who died with FXTAS and three controls were analyzed via real-time (TaqMan) qRT–PCR (Table 3). As expected (32), subjects with FXTAS had significantly elevated levels of FMR1 mRNA relative to controls, 2.53 ± 1.06-fold (P < 0.01) (Fig. 3). Using the same panel of post-mortem brain samples, LMNA mRNA levels were found to be increased 2.02 ± 0.43-fold (P < 0.01) in FXTAS samples relative to controls (Fig. 3). Despite the elevated levels of LMNA mRNA in the CNS panel, there was no corresponding elevation in lamin A/C protein levels. In fact, western blot analysis of the RIPA-soluble fraction of protein extracts from the CNS panel showed trends toward reduced levels of lamin A/C isoforms, though only lamin C demonstrated a significant reduction: lamin A (0.69 ± 1.57-fold decrease; P = 0.45) and lamin C (0.44 ± 0.41-fold decrease; P = 0.04). One of the 10 subjects (Case 10, Table 3) displayed normal levels of lamin A/C protein by western blot. Next, we analyzed the levels of lamin A/C proteins in the RIPA-insoluble fractions from the CNS panel (Table 3) to determine if the reduction of lamin A/C levels observed in most of the samples reflects decreased solubility of lamin A/C protein isoforms. Relative to the normalized control mean value of 1, FXTAS cases showed an increase of both lamin isoforms (lamin A = 2.40 ± 2.27-fold increase and lamin C = 1.53 ± 0.87-fold increase), although these increases were not statistically significant.

Table 3.

Characteristics of individuals contributing autopsy material

Group Gender Age of death CGG repeats FXTAS clinical stagea CNS neural inclusions Prior case
Controlb
 Control 1 M 69 30 0 No None
 Control 2 M 57 28 0 No None
 Control 3 M 53 21 0 No None
FXTAS
 Case 1 M 70 113 6 Yes Case 1c
 Case 2 M 72 62 6 Rare None
 Case 3 M 75 78 6 Yes None
 Case 4 M 87 65 4 Yes Case 11c
 Case 5 M 66 105 5 Yes Case 5c
 Case 6 M 77 77 6 Yes Case 6c
 Case 7 M 76 88 6 Yes Case 7c
 Case 8 M 75 92 5 Yes Case 8c
 Case 9 M 81 88 5 Yes Case 9c
 Case 10 M 68 98 6 Yes Cased

aFXTAS clinical stages: stages 0/1, uninvolved/equivocal involvement; stage 2, definite tremor or ataxia not interfering with activities of daily living (ADL); stage 3, tremor or ataxia interfering with ADLs; stage 4, use of cane or walker; stage 5, use of a wheelchair; stage 6, bedridden (22).

bFrom Maryland Brain Bank.

cGreco et al. (29,30).

dBourgeois et al.(16) and Hagerman et al. (21).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Subjects with FXTAS overexpress FMR1 and LMNA mRNA in frontal cortex. Mean mRNA levels of FMR1 and LMNA in FXTAS are elevated 2.5-fold (P = 0.0009) and 2.0-fold (P = 0.0003), respectively, in 10 cases with FXTAS (gray bars), compared with three controls (white bars). The mean values relative to GUS and the intra-subject variation of the mRNA measurements from triplicates are shown in Supplementary Material, Table S2A.

Parallel immunofluorescent analysis of lamin A/C in frontal cortex sections of Case 10 indicated the presence of normal levels of these isoforms, though the nuclear distribution of these filaments was abnormal. This patient displayed a ∼3-fold decrease in the percentage of neural cells in frontal cortex sections with ring-like organization of lamin A/C (15.18 ± 12.77%), relative to Controls 1 and 2 (50.82 ± 2.25%; P = 0.04).

Expression of heat-shock genes, αB-crystallin, HSP27 and HSP70 in CNS tissue

In addition to the lamin A/C protein isoforms, the HSPs, αB-crystallin, HSP27 and HSP70 were also found within the intranuclear inclusions characteristic of FXTAS (31). To determine whether the transcription of these HSPs was also dysregulated in CNS tissue of patients with FXTAS, the relative mRNA levels for the three HSPs were quantified in the same CNS panel of FXTAS and control patients (Table 3), using qRT–PCR. Our results indicate that mRNA levels were elevated (∼1.5–1.8-fold) for all three HSPs in the frontal cortex samples of 10 subjects affected with FXTAS compared with the controls (Fig. 4). Note that only two of three control samples were used to quantify mRNA levels of HSP27 between phenotypic groups (Supplementary Material, Table S2A and B). Therefore, although the HSP27 levels are observed to be elevated (1.8-fold measured increase) in brain samples from subjects with FXTAS, the increase does not reach the level of significance due to small sample size.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Brain tissue from 10 FXTAS cases shows increased mRNA levels of stress response genes relative to GUS (FXTAS, black bars; controls, white bars). HSP27 is elevated an average of 1.8-fold; HSP70 is elevated an average of 1.6-fold (P = 0.0216); CRYAB shows a borderline-significant trend toward elevation (P = 0.055). The expression of control genes JUNB and TSC2 relative to GUS shows no significant difference between the groups of subjects with FXTAS and controls (P = 0.789 and P = 0.708, respectively). Details of the mean values and intra-subject variation of the mRNA measurements from triplicates, and signal-to-noise ratio of mRNA measurements relative to GUS mRNA are shown in Supplementary Material, Table S2A and B.

As in the fibroblast studies, we also quantified the mRNA expression levels of two control genes, TSC2 and JUNB, relative to GUS, which were not expected to be influenced by FMR1 gene expression. Neither of these control mRNAs was overexpressed in the panel of premutation carriers compared with controls (Fig. 4).

As with FMR1 and LMNA genes, elevated mRNA levels for HSP70 and CRYAB were not accompanied by increases in their respective protein levels. Western blot analysis of the RIPA-soluble fraction of CNS protein extracts from the panel indicated that HSP70 protein is reduced in patients with FXTAS (0.76 ± 0.18-fold decrease; P = 0.03) relative to controls. The levels of soluble αB-crystallin and HSP27 proteins were not significantly altered in FXTAS compared with controls, although all three stress proteins were increased in the RIPA-insoluble (SDS-soluble) protein fraction of brain extract from subjects with FXTAS (Table 4 and Fig. 5).

Table 4.

Increased levels of aggregated HSP in frontal cortex from 10 patients with FXTAS relative to three controls, quantified by western blot

Protein Meana (SD) P-value
αB-crystallin 2.34 (1.22) 0.0461*
HSP70 1.30 (0.25) 0.0056*
HSP27 5.69 (3.40) 0.0009*

aMean values of two replicate analyses of insoluble protein extracts from 10 FXTAS cases relative to the normalized mean values (1.0) of three controls.

*Significant at level P = 0.05

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Brain tissue from FXTAS cases shows increased protein levels of HSPs relative to GAPDH. Representative replicate western blots of insoluble protein extracts probed (top to bottom) with anti-HSP70, -HSP27, -αB-crystallin and -GAPDH antibodies, respectively. The corresponding mean, SD and P-values are shown in Table 4.

Mouse embryonic fibroblasts harboring large premutation expansions also display nuclear lamin A/C dysregulation

To address the possibility that there may be a manifestation of RNA toxicity early in development when levels of FMR1 mRNA are highest, we utilized two mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) lines derived from a knock-in (KI) mouse line (45) with expanded unmethylated Fmr1 alleles. In the current study, we quantified the levels of Fmr1 mRNA in cultured mouse fibroblasts derived from two embryos and two adult mice, both with ∼200 CGG repeats, relative to control murine fibroblasts. MEFs derived from expanded CGG-repeat mice express ∼7-fold elevation in Fmr1 mRNA levels compared with MEFs derived from wild-type (wt) controls (6.9 ± 0.89 and 1.0 ± 0.2, respectively; P < 0.01). Moreover, Fmr1 expression in embryonic fibroblasts is substantially higher compared with fibroblasts derived from adult KI mice (6.9 ± 0.89 and 0.98 ± 0.30, respectively; P < 0.01). We observed no significant difference in Fmr1 mRNA levels between expanded repeat and wt cultured fibroblasts from adult mice.

Remarkably, cultured MEFs from premutation mice already display evidence of lamin A/C abnormalities. In particular, we observed a 4.6-fold decrease (85.10 ± 5.00%, wt; 18.43 ± 1.40%, KI; P < 0.01) in the percentage of complete lamin rings relative to wt MEFs (Fig. 6). Fibroblasts derived from adult mice with the expanded CGG repeat display a smaller difference in the percentage of complete lamin rings than their MEF counterparts (38.60 ± 14.1%, adults; 18.43 ± 0.81%, MEF; P < 0.01).

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Reduction of the number of cultured MEFs with normal lamin A/C rings derived from knock-in (Premutation, Pre) mice with ∼200 CGG repeats. Left: immunocytochemical localization of lamin C in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs). Upper panel: wt mouse fibroblast nuclei. Lower panel: Pre mouse fibroblasts display marked lamin A/C disruption with loss of the normal ring-like architecture (green); nuclei counterstained with DAPI, blue (×630 magnification). Right: mean number of MEFs with normal nuclear lamin A/C organization are decreased in KI (dark gray bar), compared with an age-matched wt (open bar).

DISCUSSION

The nuclear intermediate filament, lamin A/C (A and C protein isoforms), was originally associated with the pathogenesis of FXTAS by virtue of its presence in the intranuclear inclusions found in the post-mortem brain tissue of a patient with FXTAS (31). Additional studies suggested that lamin A/C disorganization and aggregation may participate in the pathogenesis of FXTAS, and led us to hypothesize that in FXTAS a broad dysregulation of lamin A/C may result in (or at least be highly correlated with) CNS pathology and may impact other tissues where FMR1 is expressed, even in the absence of intranuclear inclusion formation (37). The intranuclear inclusions found in CNS tissue in FXTAS also contain several heat-shock response proteins, including αB-crystallin, HSP27 and HSP70 (31), suggesting that there may be a cellular stress response as a downstream consequence of expression of the expanded CGG-repeat mRNA. There is an extensive literature on the role of HSPs in stabilizing cytoskeletal proteins (46, reviewed in 47,4852). In this regard, the upregulation of HSP mRNAs observed both in frontal cortex and in cultured fibroblasts could reflect a stress response to the disordered architecture of the lamin A/C network, rather than to the elevated FMR1 mRNA.

We analyzed the nuclear lamin A/C architecture and cellular stress response in skin fibroblasts of male carriers of premutation FMR1 alleles and explored the possibility that this cellular phenotype would be aggravated in patients with FXTAS. Consistent with these expectations, we observe in subjects with FXTAS a significant reduction in the percentage of cultured fibroblasts with normal ring-like lamin A/C patterns (Fig. 1). A similar pattern of dysregulation, involving upregulation of mRNA levels of three HSPs and a decrease in the percentage of fibroblasts displaying normal lamin A/C rings (Figs 1D and2), was observed in cultured skin fibroblasts from asymptomatic male carriers of premutation alleles. We did not find a significant correlation between the percentage of cells displaying lamin A/C rings and the number of CGG repeats in all premutation carriers (data not shown); however, the absence of a significant correlation could be due to the small sample size available for this study.

The levels of lamin A/C expression were also quantified in post-mortem frontal cortex from 10 patients with FXTAS and from three controls. Whereas the group of patients with FXTAS expressed increased levels of LMNA mRNA (Fig. 3), the levels of lamin A/C protein in the RIPA-soluble cellular fraction was reduced or undetectable in eight of 10 cases with FXTAS. Part of this reduction in soluble lamin levels appears to reflect repartitioning of the protein isoforms to less soluble, possibly aggregated forms of lamin (data not shown). These changes may contribute to inclusion formation in a small number of cells.

Associated with the elevated levels of the three HSP and of FMR1 mRNAs in FXTAS subjects (Figs 2 and 4; Table 3 and Supplementary Material, Table S2A), it is evident in the box plots (Fig. 2) that the range of mRNA levels for each of the four genes is substantially greater in premutation carriers (with or without FXTAS) than for the corresponding controls; this is true for either normalized data (to account for potential systematic experimental effects) or non-normalized data. This variation arises from at least two sources. First, within the premutation groups, we observe upward trends in mRNA levels with increasing CGG-repeat number (data not shown), although these trends do not reach significance, such variation is all captured as intra-group variation. The positive correlation of FMR1 mRNA levels with increasing CGG-repeat number has been reported previously (5356). A second source of added variation in the premutation subgroups is the greater biological variation than that observed for controls. Although the origin of this biological variation is not understood, repeat measurements based on separate blood draws typically display less than ∼20% variation (53,54). As expected, the expression levels of control genes JUNB and TSC2 are not elevated in either fibroblast or brain samples from premutation groups, nor do they display increased variation within the premutation groups relative to the corresponding control groups (Figs 2 and 4). Therefore, the greater variation of HSP mRNA levels in the premutation subgroups appears to be a biological effect of the premutation FMR1 allele.

Despite increased FMR1 and HSP mRNA levels in individuals with premutation alleles, the levels of the soluble forms of the corresponding proteins were not elevated in either CNS tissue or the skin fibroblasts samples analyzed. At present, we cannot explain the absence of significant, parallel increases in protein levels; however, these observations may reflect either redistribution to insoluble forms of these proteins or a marginal shift toward decreased stability. Interestingly, we did find a significant increase in accumulation of the three HSPs in the RIPA-insoluble (SDS-soluble) protein fraction of brain extracts from the FXTAS group relative to the controls (Table 4 and Fig. 5). These observations in samples from patients with FXTAS may also reflect changes in protein translocation into the nuclei. Lamin A/C protein levels were also quantified in the soluble protein fraction of brain extracts from patients with FXTAS. However, as with the HSPs, we did not observe any increases in the levels of lamin A or C isoforms that would correspond to the elevated LMNA mRNA levels.

Expression of the expanded CGG-repeat FMR1 mRNA in cultured human neural cells is capable of inducing cellular pathology within a very short time frame (∼1 week) (37), raising the possibility that early in development, when levels of FMR1 mRNA are highest, there may be evidence of FMR1 mRNA-induced cellular dysregulation. To explore this possibility, MEFs were derived from embryos of a female mouse homozygous for the expanded CGG repeat (∼180 and ∼210 CGG repeats) that was previously reported to have elevated Fmr1 mRNA levels and neuropathological characteristics of FXTAS, including the presence of inclusions in the CNS and non-CNS organs (45,5759). We observed that cultured MEFs harboring large premutation Fmr1 alleles have both elevated levels of Fmr1 mRNA and altered morphology of the lamin A/C network (Fig. 6). Fibroblasts derived from adult KI mice with the expression of normal levels of expanded CGG-repeat mRNA display a lesser degree of lamin dysregulation than their MEF counterparts. This last result suggests that the fundamental processes leading to lamin dysregulation may be at least partially reversible and that severity seems to be correlated with Fmr1 mRNA levels.

Although the mechanisms that lead to the cytoskeletal abnormalities in FXTAS and some asymptomatic male premutation carriers remain unknown, the impact that lamin A/C has on other cytoskeletal components is well documented (6063). Moreover, the consequences of abnormal cytoskeletal organization in neural cells include impaired neural cell migration during neurogenesis (6467) and impaired neural plasticity (68). For example, impaired functional connectivity has been demonstrated in fMRI studies of the amygdala in response to fearful faces in young adult men with the premutation who do not have neurological symptoms (7). This fits with the elevated rates of psychopathology and social deficits that have been reported in the previous studies of premutation carriers, particularly the males, though the females have elevated rates of depression and anxiety (6,14,15,6971).

Our findings provide evidence for a model in which increased expression of FMR1 expanded CGG mRNA results in a range of molecular consequences, including altered expression and disruption of the nuclear lamin A/C architecture and induction of the expression of stress response genes. Whether these molecular/cellular changes, also observed in asymptomatic carriers, are ultimately useful for early diagnosis and intervention will depend on whether signs of molecular pathology are predictive of clinical involvement, including incipient neurodegenerative disease; proper assessment of any such predictive associations will require both larger sample sizes and/or longitudinal studies. Nevertheless, the current study provides the experimental underpinnings (fibroblast cellular dysregulation) for such future investigations.

Whereas it may be argued that the lack of significant differences between premutation carriers with and without FXTAS is due to the small sample sizes employed in the current study, it is also possible that the basis of incomplete penetrance is due to second gene effects and/or environmental factors (e.g. general anesthesia). Thus, the findings of at least some level of molecular dysregulation in all premutation carriers suggest that premutation status may be a strong risk factor, albeit not sufficient, for developing FXTAS. Similar findings at the cellular level prior to disease onset have been reported for other neurodegenerative disorders including Alzheimer disease, where neuropathology exists many years before the onset of clinical symptoms (72). In the current instance, the identification of a fibroblast phenotype provides us with a powerful tool to look for additional genetic and/or environmental factors that may give rise to clinical involvement.

As noted above, an important limitation of the current study is small sample size. Moreover, although the ages of the subjects and controls donating tissue lie within a narrow range, it was not possible to precisely age-match the subgroups. An additional limitation of this study is the variability in the length of post-mortem intervals (PMI) of the subjects contributing brain tissue, which may have also contributed to inter-subject variability in the levels of molecules analyzed. However, from the perspective of the inter-group comparisons, we note that the PMIs of the FXTAS group were, on average, smaller than the PMIs of the controls. To account at least partially for the effects of differing PMIs, all mRNA and protein levels were quantified relative to GUS (mRNA) and to glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (protein), respectively.

CONCLUSION

We have demonstrated that the several key features of the pathogenesis of FXTAS, namely dysregulation of the nuclear lamin A/C and transcriptional induction of several stress response genes, are manifest in both CNS tissue and skin fibroblasts derived from male premutation carriers. Together, these findings suggest that the underlying cellular response to the expanded CGG-repeat mRNA is not limited to cells of the CNS and that such responses may be taking place early in development. As part of a common underlying pathogenic (RNA toxicity) mechanism, our observations provide a framework for considering the developmental involvement occasionally seen in children with the premutation (58); emotional difficulties including depression, anxiety and obsessive compulsive features (14,15); and neuropsychological deficits in adults without FXTAS (913). Indeed, the presence of cellular dysregulation in older adults who do not manifest clinical features of FXTAS may reflect the participation of additional genetic or environmental protective factors. Future studies will be directed towards proteins binding the expanded CGG-repeat mRNA and their pathogenic downstream effects that underlie the clinical symptoms seen in FXTAS.

The foregoing studies have underscored the potential strengths of the fibroblast as a peripheral cell model to investigate the basis of FXTAS and other premutation-associated disorders. Moreover, from a clinical perspective, further understanding of the similarities of form and extent of cellular dysregulation between the fibroblast and neural cells in FXTAS should allow the fibroblast to serve as a gauge of the progression of clinical involvement in this disorder, and possibly as an early indicator of incipient disease and/or as a monitor of the efficacy of targeted therapeutic interventions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subjects

All studies of post-mortem and fibroblast (biopsy) tissue samples were performed with approved protocols and informed consent in accordance with the Institutional Review Boards of the University of California, Davis or Rush University Medical Center.

The subjects included in this study were referred to our centers because they presented with FXTAS symptoms, including tremor and/or ataxia, were carriers ascertained through families with a fragile X syndrome proband or were controls in similar age group range. There was no attempt to recruit subjects of any particular ethnicity. The ethnic background of the subjects participating in this study is white Caucasian for skin fibroblast studies and mainly white Caucasian subjects for brain studies, (two control subjects and 10 cases with FXTAS were white Caucasian, control subject C1 was African-American), and all were non-Hispanic.

We studied cultured skin fibroblasts from 11 male premutation carriers: six with FXTAS and five without FXTAS symptoms (asymptomatic) and six controls (Table 1). The control group had a similar age range (mean 67.00 ± 11.80) to the groups of asymptomatic premutation carriers and carriers with FXTAS (mean 70.20 ± 3.60 and 69.70 ± 8.10, respectively). There was no significant difference in age between the control group and the two groups of premutation carriers that donated skin fibroblasts (P = 0.81) through punch biopsy.

The current investigation also included post-mortem frontal cortex samples from 10 men who died between 2002 and 2005 with symptoms of FXTAS and from three controls (Table 2). The PMIs for cases affected with FXTAS were shorter (∼12 h or less) than control cases (between 12 and 17 h). For post-mortem samples, although the FXTAS group had a higher mean age than the control group (74.7 ± 6.1 versus 60.0 ± 8.3 years, respectively), the difference did not reach significance (P = 0.068).

The brain samples and fibroblast samples were not from the same subjects.

Cultured human fibroblasts

All subjects contributing skin biopsies were participants in a multicenter study to characterize neurological findings in premutation carriers (Table 1).

Full thickness skin biopsies were performed with a 3 mm punch under local anesthesia with lidocaine. The biopsy was placed in culture media and later diced under sterile conditions on a culture plate and then plated in T25 flasks in AmnioMAX™-C100 Basal Medium (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) containing 15% AmnioMAX™-C100 Supplement (Gibco). After cells grew out, longer-term cultures were maintained in RPMI-1640 (Gibco) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco) and 1× penicillin–streptomycin (pen–strep) media (100 U/ml penicillin G sodium and 100 μ/ml streptomycin sulfate; Gibco). Synchronization of fibroblast cultures was achieved by contact inhibition and serum starvation using a modified protocol (73); briefly, confluent fibroblast cultures were cultured in RPMI-1640 media without fetal bovine serum, at 37°C, 5% CO2, for 2 days. The ability to synchronize cultured fibroblasts in the G1–G0 phase of the cell cycle was monitored by processing for flow cytometric (FACS) analysis of DNA content of fixed cells with propidium iodide, the level of enrichment of fibroblasts in G1–G0 was 83 ± 2%. The rationale for synchronizing the cultured fibroblasts is based on the fact that abnormalities in lamin A/C organization in FXTAS were previously reported using a neural model for FXTAS (37), as well as the fact that lamin A/C organization varies with stages of the cell cycle. The assembly of the lamin A/C network is increased during G1-S, and it is visualized as a ring around the inner nuclear membrane. This organized structure, together with the nuclear envelope, is disassembled during mitosis—resulting in the loss of lamin A/C rings—in order for the condensed chromosomes to gain access to the mitotic spindle. In telophase, the dispersed lamins are recycled to form nuclear envelopes in each daughter cell (reviewed in 74). Moreover, the expression of HSPs is also thought to oscillate throughout different stages of the cell cycle (75,76). Taken together, in order to evaluate the effects that premutations in FMR1 have on the expression of lamin A/C and HSPs, we decided to analyze fibroblasts synchronized in the G1 stage of the cell cycle.

FXTAS Rating Scale

Videotapes from the structured neurological examination, designed to capture the major motor features of FXTAS: tremor, cerebellar dysfunction and parkinsonism, were scored by a movement disorder neurologist blinded to the subject's premutation status, utilizing the FXTAS Rating Scale, Version 1.0 (77).

FXTAS clinical staging scale

Subjects included in this study were also assigned a rating on a six-point FXTAS clinical staging scale (Tables 1 and 2) based on the description of the degree of movement and gait problems, as previously described (22,78).

Post-mortem brain tissue

Brain autopsies were performed as described (29). Characteristics of individuals contributing autopsy materials are listed in Table 2. The clinical and neuropathological features of FXTAS Cases 1, and 4–9 have been described previously (29,30), and correspond in case number to those presented in Greco et al. (29). Clinical features have also been described for Case 10 (21,79). The following cases were not previously reported.

Case 2 was characterized by family members as a brilliant professional who had life-long social anxiety, with alcoholism and obsessive thinking. At age 60, he had a thalamic stroke, followed by neurological deterioration with increasing difficulty swallowing. He had also experienced severe neuropathic pain in both legs for a number of years. Ataxia began at age 65; intention tremor was evident but sporadic. He developed cognitive decline and dementia over several years prior to his death. At autopsy, his left hemisphere showed vascular hyalinization, and scattered cystic infarcts (remote ischaemic nature) in cerebral white matter, basal ganglia and pons. Rare intranuclear inclusions were identified only in astrocytes of the hippocampal endplate.

Case 3 had a long history of ataxia, frequent falling and deterioration in his handwriting. His MRI demonstrated moderate volume loss and severe white matter disease in basal ganglia, anterior limb of the internal capsule and subcortical regions, as well as a prominent MCP sign, which confirmed his clinical diagnosis of FXTAS before his death at age 76. Post-mortem examination of his brain (right cerebrum) showed moderate fronto-parietal atrophy. Histopathological evaluation showed pallor and spongiosis of cerebral white matter. Eosinophilic intranuclear inclusions were identified in neurons and astrocytes of the hippocampal endplate.

Molecular data

Determination of CGG-repeat length

Genomic DNA from either cultured fibroblasts or brain samples was amplified using an enhanced PCR technique as described (80), followed by sizing using the Qiaxcel Genetic Analyzer (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) (81). CGG-repeat sizes used in analyses for whole dermal mounts were determined from peripheral blood lymphocytes.

Quantification of mRNA levels

Measurements of FMR1 mRNA levels utilized qRT–PCR, using the 7900 Sequence Detector (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) as described (82). FMR1, LMNA, CRYAB, HSP27 and HSP70 mRNA levels were determined by qRT–PCR using gene-specific probe/primer sets by Applied Biosystems, Assays on Demand. These mRNAs of interest were quantified relative to GUS mRNA expression. The mRNA levels of tuberin (TSC2) and of oncogene Jun-B (JUNB) genes (gene-specific probe/primer sets by Applied Biosystems, Assays on Demand) relative to GUS were also quantified as additional internal controls. Each individual data point consists of 12 measurements: two independent primary fibroblast cultures and mRNA extractions from either primary cultured fibroblasts or brain tissue, in duplicate, analyzing three mRNA concentrations per sample, including technical replicate values (same mRNA preparations measured twice). Mouse-specific sets of primer/probe were used to quantify Fmr1 mRNA relative to mouse Gus mRNA levels (Applied Biosystems, Assays on Demand). Quantification of mRNA levels in human fibroblasts, MEFs and adult mouse fibroblasts was performed on cell cultures that were synchronized using the same conditions described for cultured human fibroblasts.

Generation of stable, expanded CGG MEF cell lines

The KI mice harboring large expansions (∼200 CGG repeats) of the CGG-repeat element in the Fmr1 gene have been described (45,58,59). A timed mating was set up between a male mouse (∼220 CGG repeats) and a female mouse homozygous for the expanded CGG repeat (∼180 and ∼210 CGG repeats). The pregnant female was sacrificed at day 14 post-coitum. Two embryos were processed to make two MEF lines. The embryonic sacs and placenta were removed from each embryo. The embryos were placed in PBS. After removal of PBS, the remainder of the embryo was minced. Five milliliter of trypsin/EDTA (TE) was added per embryo and incubated for 10 min at 37°C while shaking. The cell-TE suspension was removed and added to DMEM (BioWhittaker, Walkersville, MD, USA) with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) and 1% pen–strep to neutralize the trypsin. After incubation for 30 min at 37°C with shaking, the cells were filtered and spun down, resuspended in DMEM with 10% FCS and 1% pen–strep and plated onto a culture dish for each embryo. Cells were split upon reaching 100% confluency.

Adult mouse skin fibroblast lines were generated by cutting a piece of shaved skin from a mouse harboring a CGG repeat of ∼200 CGGs, and from a wt control, which were sacrificed at 20 weeks of age. The pieces of skin were minced and left to proliferate in DMEM with 10% FCS and 1% pen–strep. Cells were split upon reaching confluency and cultured until they became established fibroblast lines.

Immunofluorescence microscopy

Cultured cells

Primary cultures of human dermal fibroblasts and mouse embryonic and adult skin fibroblasts (10 000 cells/coverslip) were grown on individual glass coverslips in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% FCS and 1× pen–strep and incubated for 48 h at 37°C and 5.0% CO2. When cells reached 70% confluency, they were synchronized via serum starvation (grown in media without FBS for 48 h), followed by fixation and blocking (37). Intranuclear inclusion formation of lamin A/C and HSPs was evaluated by co-staining blocked coverslips overnight (4°C) with rabbit anti-lamin A/C (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA; 1:1000) and mouse anti-αB-crystallin (Stressgen, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; 1:1000 dilution) antibodies, followed by washes and incubation with Alexa 488 goat anti-rabbit (Molecular Probes, Carlsbad, CA, USA; 1:1000) and Alexa 555 goat anti-mouse. The cellular distributions of HSP27 and HSP70 relative to lamin were studied by incubating fibroblasts with a combination of rabbit anti-lamin C (GeneTex Inc., Irvine, CA, USA; 1:1000) and mouse anti-HSP27 (Stressgen; 1:1000) antibodies, or mouse anti-lamin A/C (BD Biosciences; 1:1000) and rabbit anti-HSP70 (Stressgen; 1:1000) antibodies, respectively. Coverslips were washed in PBS-T, and then incubated with secondary antibodies: Alexa 488 goat anti-rabbit (Molecular Probes; 1:500) and Alexa 555 goat anti-mouse (Molecular Probes; 1:1,000) for HSP27; and Alexa 488 goat anti-mouse (Molecular Probes; 1:1000) and Alexa 555 goat anti-rabbit (Molecular Probes; 1:1000) for HSP70. All samples were counterstained with DAPI (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) to define nuclear shape and area. Slides were examined by fluorescence microscopy (Provis Olympus, Center Valley, PA, USA) to characterize lamin organization (± uniform ring-like structure). Additional details of the scoring criteria are presented in Supplementary Material, Figure S1. Note that in order to visualize a complete lamin ring, the focus on the microscope might need to be adjusted.

For the presence of HSP-positive intranuclear inclusions (±) (37), we scored an average of 300 cells per human subject, and an average of 323 cells per mouse cell line. The selection of the individual fibroblast cells to be evaluated was done by the statistician, independently of the investigator performing the lamin ring analysis and was based on a set of coordinates generated by a random number generator. In all samples and replicates, fibroblasts growing at the same randomized coordinates were evaluated in terms of their lamin architecture. The investigator evaluating lamin was blinded to genotype and phenotype of the subjects that contributed skin fibroblasts. The percentage of fibroblasts displaying normal lamin A/C rings was evaluated. Three independent staining experiments (technical replicates) were performed per subject.

Whole tissue

Tissues from human skin biopsies were formalin-fixed and processed for paraffin embedding in standard fashion. Antigen retrieval was accomplished by heating slides for 45 min at 95°C in 0.05 m Tris–HCl, pH 9.5 with 0.05% polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate. Slides were allowed to cool to room temperature and were washed with PBS-T. Slides were incubated in blocking solution (5% donkey serum in PBS-T) and stained for lamin A/C as outlined above for cultured cells or for ubiquitin (Stressgen 1:1000) using a goat anti-mouse Alexa 555 as a secondary antibody.

One-dimensional western blot analysis

Protein concentrations derived from cultured skin fibroblasts from the subjects listed in Table 1 were quantified using a protein assay kit (#23225, BCA Protein Assay Kit, Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL, USA). Following electrophoresis of 20 μg per sample on 10.5–14% linear gradient Criterion Tris–HCl gels (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA), proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were subsequently blocked with BLOTTO (5% non-fat dry milk in 100 mm Tris–HCl, 0.9% NaCl, 0.1% polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate, pH 7.5) followed by overnight incubation with primary antibodies: mouse monoclonal anti-lamin A/C (BD Biosciences), rabbit polyclonal anti-HSP70 (SPA-812, Stressgen), mouse monoclonal anti-HSP27 (SPA-800, Stressgen), mouse monoclonal anti-αB-crystallin (SPA-222, Stressgen) or mouse monoclonal anti-GAPDH (GTX29484, GeneTex, Inc.), diluted in BLOTTO. Following washes with TBS-T (100 mm Tris, 150 mm NaCl, 0.1% polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate), blots were incubated with horseradish peroxidase conjugated secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc., West Grove, PA, USA). Detection of antibodies was accomplished with SuperSignal West Dura Extended Duration Substrate (#34075, Pierce Biotechnology). Autoradiograms were quantified by densitometry using ImageJ (83).

Frozen frontal cortex from three controls and 10 cases with FXTAS were powdered in the presence of liquid N2 and homogenized (Dounce) in RIPA buffer (50 mm Tris–HCl, 150 mm NaCl, 2 mm EDTA, 0.5% IGEPAL, 0.1% SDS, 0.012% deoxycholate, 0.5% Triton X-100, pH 7.4) with protease and phosphatase inhibitors. Homogenates were spun at 16 000g at 4°C. RIPA-insoluble fractions (protein pellets) and soluble protein fractions were quantified and diluted in Laemmli sample buffer and heated for 5 min at 95°C before loading 20 μg per sample. The protocol described above to quantify proteins of interest in fibroblast samples was also used to quantify lamin A/C and HSPs (αB-crystallin, HSP27 and HSP70) in protein extracts from human brain.

Altogether, the levels of these proteins were quantified from (i) total protein extracts (RIPA-soluble fractions) from asynchronized tissue from subjects listed in Tables 1 and 2; (ii) enriched nuclear protein extracts and enriched cytoplasmic protein extracts from synchronized cultures (from subjects listed in Table 1), isolated with NePer kit (Pierce Biotechnology) and (iii) total insoluble protein fractions in RIPA from subjects listed in Table 2.

Statistical analysis

Comparison of the ages and CGG-repeat numbers of the participants that provided skin samples to this study was based on the analysis of variance (ANOVA). The sample groups for cultured skin fibroblasts (Table 1) are premutation carriers without FXTAS (asymptomatic), carriers with FXTAS and controls. We also compared all premutation carriers (with and without FXTAS) to the control group for fibroblast data. Fibroblast mRNA and protein quantification analyses included replicate measurements: two replicates for mRNA measures (FMR1, CRYAB, HSP27, HSP70, JUNB and TSC2); four replicates for nuclear protein measures (lamin A/C, αB-crystallin, HSP27, HSP70); two replicates for cytoplasmic protein, two replicates for total protein and a single measurement for nuclear insoluble protein. Thus, comparisons of expression among groups were also based on the ANOVA method for nuclear, insoluble lamin A/C protein. For replicated measurements, the repeated measures ANOVA method was used to account for within- and between-replicate variability in comparisons among groups. Prior to fitting repeated measures ANOVA models, each measurement was rescaled via normalization by dividing each variable (e.g. lamin A) by the mean of the corresponding variable in the control group and analyses were performed on log-transformed data to stabilize the variance and potential skewness of the data.

The sample groups for the brain studies (Table 2) are subjects who died with FXTAS and controls. Due to the smaller sample size of the control group in brain samples, we also performed non-parametric tests comparing differences in mRNA and protein expression in brain between control and premutation. The conclusions based on this latter analysis were unchanged from those of the ANOVA. Independent analyses of brain samples were performed for relative mRNA levels of FMR1, HSP27, HSP70, LMNA and CRYAB. In qRT–PCR assays for mRNA levels, three RNA concentrations per subject were utilized as described in Tassone et al. (82). Protein and mRNA quantification in brain samples included technical replicate measurements: two replicates for mRNA measures (FMR1, CRYAB, HSP27, HSP70); four replicates for total soluble protein measures (lamin A/C, HSP27, HSP70) and two measurements for the insoluble fraction of total protein extracts. The expression of mRNAs and proteins are reported as the mean levels per group ± SD, unless specified otherwise.

For the analysis of the numbers of normal lamin A/C rings in cultured human fibroblasts or in the MEF cell lines, nuclei were scored for the presence or absence of a uniform ring-like structure (a complete/closed ring of lamin staining the inner nuclear membrane). The percentages of human fibroblasts with complete lamin rings were grouped according to clinical phenotype: FXTAS (stages 3 or greater), asymptomatic premutation carriers (stage 0) and controls; and for mouse-derived fibroblasts according to wt controls, and KI mice with ∼200 CGG repeats. Pairwise inter-group comparisons of the average percent of rings in (2–6) independent staining experiments were based on repeated measures ANOVA.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

Supplementary Material is available at HMG online.

FUNDING

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health through individual research awards [AG024488, NS43532 to P.J.H., HD036071 to R.J.H.]; from an NIH Roadmap Interdisciplinary Research Consortium (IRC) grant [UL1DE19583, RL1AG032119 to P.J.H., RL1NS062411 to R.W., RL1AG032115 to R.J.H.] and a Circle of Service Foundation grant to E.M.B.-K. D.G-A. was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship through the IRC [TL1DA024854] and a grant from the National Fragile X Foundation. J.R.B. was supported by a grant from Prinses Beatrix Fonds. The Brain and Tissue Bank for Developmental Disorders at the University of Maryland at Baltimore [NICHD contract no. NO1-HD-4-3368 and NO1-HD-4-3383] provided us with control samples for this study. We also received support from the National Institutes of Health [NIH DK 35747 to the UC Davis Clinical Nutrition Research Unit for the use of the ABI 7900HT Real time PCR System].

Supplementary Material

[Supplementary Data]
ddp497_index.html (687B, html)

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors would like to thank the patients and families who participated in our research for making these studies possible and to Ying Yang and Nathan Whitmore for their participation in this research. Finally, we wish to acknowledge general/infrastructural support from the UC Davis M.I.N.D. Institute and the UC Davis Clinical and Translational Science Center (CTSC) [UL1 RR024146]. Several case evaluations and samples came though a grant awarded to J.G. [R01 NS044299].

Conflict of Interest statement. None declared.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Berry-Kravis E., Abrams L., Coffey S.M., Hall D.A., Greco C., Gane L.W., Grigsby J., Bourgeois J.A., Finucane B., Jacquemont S., et al. Fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome: clinical features, genetics, and testing guidelines. Mov. Disord. 2007;22:2018–2030. doi: 10.1002/mds.21493. quiz 2140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hagerman P.J., Hagerman R.J. Fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome—an older face of the fragile X gene. Nat. Clin. Pract. Neurol. 2007;3:107–112. doi: 10.1038/ncpneuro0373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jacquemont S., Hagerman R.J., Hagerman P.J., Leehey M.A. Fragile-X syndrome and fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome: two faces of. FMR1. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6:45–55. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70676-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Willemsen R., Mientjes E., Oostra B.A. FXTAS: a progressive neurologic syndrome associated with Fragile X premutation. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 2005;5:405–410. doi: 10.1007/s11910-005-0065-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Aziz M., Stathopulu E., Callias M., Taylor C., Turk J., Oostra B., Willemsen R., Patton M. Clinical features of boys with fragile X premutations and intermediate alleles. Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 2003;121:119–127. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.20030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Farzin F., Perry H., Hessl D., Loesch D., Cohen J., Bacalman S., Gane L., Tassone F., Hagerman P., Hagerman R. Autism spectrum disorders and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in boys with the fragile X premutation. J. Dev. Behav. Pediatr. 2006;27:S137–S144. doi: 10.1097/00004703-200604002-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hessl D., Rivera S., Koldewyn K., Cordeiro L., Adams J., Tassone F., Hagerman P.J., Hagerman R.J. Amygdala dysfunction in men with the fragile X premutation. Brain. 2007;130:404–416. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bailey D.B., Jr, Raspa M., Olmsted M., Holiday D.B. Co-occurring conditions associated with FMR1 gene variations: findings from a national parent survey. Am. J. Med. Genet. A. 2008;146A:2060–2069. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.32439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cornish K., Turk J., Hagerman R. The fragile X continuum: new advances and perspectives. J. Intellect. Disabil. Res. 2008;52:469–482. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2008.01056.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cornish K.M., Li L., Kogan C.S., Jacquemont S., Turk J., Dalton A., Hagerman R.J., Hagerman P.J. Age-dependent cognitive changes in carriers of the fragile X syndrome. Cortex. 2008;44:628–636. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2006.11.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Moore C.J., Daly E.M., Schmitz N., Tassone F., Tysoe C., Hagerman R.J., Hagerman P.J., Morris R.G., Murphy K.C., Murphy D.G. A neuropsychological investigation of male premutation carriers of fragile X syndrome. Neuropsychologia. 2004;42:1934–1947. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Grigsby J., Brega A.G., Engle K., Leehey M.A., Hagerman R.J., Tassone F., Hessl D., Hagerman P.J., Cogswell J.B., Bennett R.E., et al. Cognitive profile of fragile X premutation carriers with and without fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome. Neuropsychology. 2008;22:48–60. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.22.1.48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Brega A.G., Goodrich G., Bennett R.E., Hessl D., Engle K., Leehey M.A., Bounds L.S., Paulich M.J., Hagerman R.J., Hagerman P.J., et al. The primary cognitive deficit among males with fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS) is a dysexecutive syndrome. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 2008:1–17. doi: 10.1080/13803390701819044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hessl D., Tassone F., Loesch D.Z., Berry-Kravis E., Leehey M.A., Gane L.W., Barbato I., Rice C., Gould E., Hall D.A., et al. Abnormal elevation of FMR1 mRNA is associated with psychological symptoms in individuals with the fragile X premutation. Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 2005;139:115–121. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.30241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Roberts J.E., Bailey D.B., Jr, Mankowski J., Ford A., Sideris J., Weisenfeld L.A., Heath T.M., Golden R.N. Mood and anxiety disorders in females with the FMR1 premutation. Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 2008;150B:130–139. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.30786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bourgeois J.A., Cogswell J.B., Hessl D., Zhang L., Ono M.Y., Tassone F., Farzin F., Brunberg J.A., Grigsby J., Hagerman R.J. Cognitive, anxiety and mood disorders in the fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome. Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry. 2007;29:349–356. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2007.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sullivan A.K., Marcus M., Epstein M.P., Allen E.G., Anido A.E., Paquin J.J., Yadav-Shah M., Sherman S.L. Association of FMR1 repeat size with ovarian dysfunction. Hum. Reprod. 2005;20:402–412. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wittenberger M.D., Hagerman R.J., Sherman S.L., McConkie-Rosell A., Welt C.K., Rebar R.W., Corrigan E.C., Simpson J.L., Nelson L.M. The FMR1 premutation and reproduction. Fertil. Steril. 2007;87:456–465. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Coffey S.M., Cook K., Tartaglia N., Tassone F., Nguyen D.V., Pan R., Bronsky H.E., Yuhas J., Borodyanskaya M., Grigsby J., et al. Expanded clinical phenotype of women with the FMR1 premutation. Am. J. Med. Genet. A. 2008;146:1009–1016. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.32060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Amiri K., Hagerman R.J., Hagerman P.J. Fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome: an aging face of the fragile X gene. Arch. Neurol. 2008;65:19–25. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2007.30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hagerman R.J., Leehey M., Heinrichs W., Tassone F., Wilson R., Hills J., Grigsby J., Gage B., Hagerman P.J. Intention tremor, parkinsonism, and generalized brain atrophy in male carriers of fragile X. Neurology. 2001;57:127–130. doi: 10.1212/wnl.57.1.127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bacalman S., Farzin F., Bourgeois J.A., Cogswell J., Goodlin-Jones B.L., Gane L.W., Grigsby J., Leehey M.A., Tassone F., Hagerman R.J. Psychiatric Phenotype of the Fragile X-Associated Tremor/Ataxia Syndrome (FXTAS) in Males: Newly Described Fronto-Subcortical Dementia. J. Clin. Psychiatry. 2006;67:87–94. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v67n0112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Berry-Kravis E., Goetz C.G., Leehey M.A., Hagerman R.J., Zhang L., Li L., Nguyen D., Hall D.A., Tartaglia N., Cogswell J., et al. Neuropathic features in fragile X premutation carriers. Am. J. Med. Genet. A. 2007;143:19–26. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.31559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Berry-Kravis E., Lewin F., Wuu J., Leehey M., Hagerman R., Hagerman P., Goetz C.G. Tremor and ataxia in fragile X premutation carriers: blinded videotape study. Ann. Neurol. 2003;53:616–623. doi: 10.1002/ana.10522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Brunberg J.A., Jacquemont S., Hagerman R.J., Berry-Kravis E.M., Grigsby J., Leehey M.A., Tassone F., Brown W.T., Greco C.M., Hagerman P.J. Fragile X premutation carriers: characteristic MR imaging findings of adult male patients with progressive cerebellar and cognitive dysfunction. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2002;23:1757–1766. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Grigsby J., Brega A.G., Leehey M.A., Goodrich G.K., Jacquemont S., Loesch D.Z., Cogswell J.B., Epstein J., Wilson R., Jardini T., et al. Impairment of executive cognitive functioning in males with fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome. Mov. Disord. 2007;22:645–650. doi: 10.1002/mds.21359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jacquemont S., Hagerman R.J., Leehey M.A., Hall D.A., Levine R.A., Brunberg J.A., Zhang L., Jardini T., Gane L.W., Harris S.W., et al. Penetrance of the fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome in a premutation carrier population. J Am Med Assoc. 2004;291:460–469. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.4.460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Leehey M.A., Hagerman R.J., Landau W.M., Grigsby J., Tassone F., Hagerman P.J. Tremor/ataxia syndrome in fragile X carrier males. Mov. Disord. 2002;17:744–745. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Greco C.M., Berman R.F., Martin R.M., Tassone F., Schwartz P.H., Chang A., Trapp B.D., Iwahashi C., Brunberg J., Grigsby J., et al. Neuropathology of fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS) Brain. 2006;129:243–255. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Greco C.M., Hagerman R.J., Tassone F., Chudley A.E., Del Bigio M.R., Jacquemont S., Leehey M., Hagerman P.J. Neuronal intranuclear inclusions in a new cerebellar tremor/ataxia syndrome among fragile X carriers. Brain. 2002;125:1760–1771. doi: 10.1093/brain/awf184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Iwahashi C.K., Yasui D.H., An H.J., Greco C.M., Tassone F., Nannen K., Babineau B., Lebrilla C.B., Hagerman R.J., Hagerman P.J. Protein composition of the intranuclear inclusions of FXTAS. Brain. 2006;129:256–271. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tassone F., Hagerman R.J., Garcia-Arocena D., Khandjian E.W., Greco C.M., Hagerman P.J. Intranuclear inclusions in neural cells with premutation alleles in fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome. J. Med. Genet. 2004;41:e43. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2003.012518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hagerman P.J., Hagerman R.J. The fragile-X premutation: a maturing perspective. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2004;74:805–816. doi: 10.1086/386296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Jin P., Zarnescu D.C., Zhang F., Pearson C.E., Lucchesi J.C., Moses K., Warren S.T. RNA-mediated neurodegeneration caused by the fragile X premutation rCGG repeats in Drosophila. Neuron. 2003;39:739–747. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00533-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Jin P., Duan R., Qurashi A., Qin Y., Tian D., Rosser T.C., Liu H., Feng Y., Warren S.T. Pur alpha binds to rCGG repeats and modulates repeat-mediated neurodegeneration in a Drosophila model of fragile X tremor/ataxia syndrome. Neuron. 2007;55:556–564. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.07.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sofola O.A., Jin P., Qin Y., Duan R., Liu H., de Haro M., Nelson D.L., Botas J. RNA-binding proteins hnRNP A2/B1 and CUGBP1 suppress fragile X CGG premutation repeat-induced neurodegeneration in a Drosophila model of FXTAS. Neuron. 2007;55:565–571. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.07.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Arocena D.G., Iwahashi C.K., Won N., Beilina A., Ludwig A.L., Tassone F., Schwartz P.H., Hagerman P.J. Induction of inclusion formation and disruption of lamin A/C structure by premutation CGG-repeat RNA in human cultured neural cells. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2005;14:3661–3671. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddi394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lees-Miller S.P. Dysfunction of lamin A triggers a DNA damage response and cellular senescence. DNA Repair (Amst.) 2006;5:286–289. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2005.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Favreau C., Dubosclard E., Ostlund C., Vigouroux C., Capeau J., Wehnert M., Higuet D., Worman H.J., Courvalin J.C., Buendia B. Expression of lamin A mutated in the carboxyl-terminal tail generates an aberrant nuclear phenotype similar to that observed in cells from patients with Dunnigan-type partial lipodystrophy and Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy. Exp. Cell. Res. 2003;282:14–23. doi: 10.1006/excr.2002.5669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Markiewicz E., Venables R., Mauricio Alvarez R., Quinlan R., Dorobek M., Hausmanowa-Petrucewicz I., Hutchison C. Increased solubility of lamins and redistribution of lamin C in X-linked Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy fibroblasts. J. Struct. Biol. 2002;140:241–253. doi: 10.1016/s1047-8477(02)00573-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Paradisi M., McClintock D., Boguslavsky R.L., Pedicelli C., Worman H.J., Djabali K. Dermal fibroblasts in Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome with the lamin A G608G mutation have dysmorphic nuclei and are hypersensitive to heat stress. BMC Cell Biol. 2005;6:27. doi: 10.1186/1471-2121-6-27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Sullivan T., Escalante-Alcalde D., Bhatt H., Anver M., Bhat N., Nagashima K., Stewart C.L., Burke B. Loss of A-type lamin expression compromises nuclear envelope integrity leading to muscular dystrophy. J. Cell Biol. 1999;147:913–920. doi: 10.1083/jcb.147.5.913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Vigouroux C., Auclair M., Dubosclard E., Pouchelet M., Capeau J., Courvalin J.C., Buendia B. Nuclear envelope disorganization in fibroblasts from lipodystrophic patients with heterozygous R482Q/W mutations in the lamin A/C gene. J. Cell Sci. 2001;114:4459–4468. doi: 10.1242/jcs.114.24.4459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Worman H.J., Courvalin J.C. Nuclear envelope, nuclear lamina, and inherited disease. Int. Rev. Cytol. 2005;246:231–279. doi: 10.1016/S0074-7696(05)46006-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Brouwer J.R., Mientjes E.J., Bakker C.E., Nieuwenhuizen I.M., Severijnen L.A., Van der Linde H.C., Nelson D.L., Oostra B.A., Willemsen R. Elevated Fmr1 mRNA levels and reduced protein expression in a mouse model with an unmethylated Fragile X full mutation. Exp. Cell. Res. 2007;313:244–253. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2006.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kato K., Ito H., Inaguma Y., Okamoto K., Saga S. Synthesis and accumulation of alphaB-crystallin in C6 glioma cells is induced by agents that promote the disassembly of microtubules. J. Biol. Chem. 1996;271:26989–26994. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.43.26989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Head M.W., Goldman J.E. Small heat shock proteins, the cytoskeleton, and inclusion body formation. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 2000;26:304–312. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2990.2000.00269.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Launay N., Goudeau B., Kato K., Vicart P., Lilienbaum A. Cell signaling pathways to alphaB-crystallin following stresses of the cytoskeleton. Exp. Cell. Res. 2006;312:3570–3584. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2006.07.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Koh T.J., Escobedo J. Cytoskeletal disruption and small heat shock protein translocation immediately after lengthening contractions. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2004;286:C713–C722. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00341.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Mounier N., Arrigo A.P. Actin cytoskeleton and small heat shock proteins: how do they interact? Cell Stress Chaperones. 2002;7:167–176. doi: 10.1379/1466-1268(2002)007<0167:acashs>2.0.co;2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Endemann M., Bergmeister H., Bidmon B., Boehm M., Csaicsich D., Malaga-Dieguez L., Arbeiter K., Regele H., Herkner K., Aufricht C. Evidence for HSP-mediated cytoskeletal stabilization in mesothelial cells during acute experimental peritoneal dialysis. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 2007;292:F47–F56. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00503.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Pivovarova A.V., Chebotareva N.A., Chernik I.S., Gusev N.B., Levitsky D.I. Small heat shock protein Hsp27 prevents heat-induced aggregation of F-actin by forming soluble complexes with denatured actin. FEBS J. 2007;274:5937–5948. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2007.06117.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Tassone F., Hagerman R.J., Chamberlain W.D., Hagerman P.J. Transcription of the FMR1 gene in individuals with fragile X syndrome. Am. J. Med. Genet. 2000;97:195–203. doi: 10.1002/1096-8628(200023)97:3<195::AID-AJMG1037>3.0.CO;2-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Tassone F., Hagerman R.J., Loesch D.Z., Lachiewicz A., Taylor A.K., Hagerman P.J. Fragile X males with unmethylated, full mutation trinucleotide repeat expansions have elevated levels of FMR1 messenger RNA. Am. J. Med. Genet. 2000;94:232–236. doi: 10.1002/1096-8628(20000918)94:3<232::aid-ajmg9>3.0.co;2-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Allen E., He W., Yadav-Shah M., Sherman S. A study of the distributional characteristics of FMR1 transcript levels in 238 individuals. Hum. Genet. 2004;114:439–447. doi: 10.1007/s00439-004-1086-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Kenneson A., Zhang F., Hagedorn C.H., Warren S.T. Reduced FMRP and increased FMR1 transcription is proportionally associated with CGG repeat number in intermediate-length and premutation carriers. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2001;10:1449–1454. doi: 10.1093/hmg/10.14.1449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Willemsen R., Hoogeveen-Westerveld M., Reis S., Holstege J., Severijnen L.A., Nieuwenhuizen I.M., Schrier M., van Unen L., Tassone F., Hoogeveen A.T., et al. The FMR1 CGG repeat mouse displays ubiquitin-positive intranuclear neuronal inclusions; implications for the cerebellar tremor/ataxia syndrome. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2003;12:949–959. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddg114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Brouwer J.R., Huizer K., Severijnen L.A., Hukema R.K., Berman R.F., Oostra B.A., Willemsen R. CGG-repeat length and neuropathological and molecular correlates in a mouse model for fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome. J. Neurochem. 2008;107:1671–1682. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05747.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Brouwer J.R., Severijnen E., de Jong F.H., Hessl D., Hagerman R.J., Oostra B.A., Willemsen R. Altered hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal gland axis regulation in the expanded CGG-repeat mouse model for fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2008;33:863–873. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.03.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Crisp M., Liu Q., Roux K., Rattner J.B., Shanahan C., Burke B., Stahl P.D., Hodzic D. Coupling of the nucleus and cytoplasm: role of the LINC complex. J. Cell Biol. 2006;172:41–53. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200509124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Gruenbaum Y., Margalit A., Goldman R.D., Shumaker D.K., Wilson K.L. The nuclear lamina comes of age. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2005;6:21–31. doi: 10.1038/nrm1550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Starr D.A., Han M. Role of ANC-1 in tethering nuclei to the actin cytoskeleton. Science. 2002;298:406–409. doi: 10.1126/science.1075119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Warren D.T., Zhang Q., Weissberg P.L., Shanahan C.M. Nesprins: intracellular scaffolds that maintain cell architecture and coordinate cell function? Expert Rev. Mol. Med. 2005;7:1–15. doi: 10.1017/S1462399405009294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Djabali K., de Nechaud B., Landon F., Portier M.M. AlphaB-crystallin interacts with intermediate filaments in response to stress. J. Cell Sci. 1997;110:2759–2769. doi: 10.1242/jcs.110.21.2759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Haendel M.A., Bollinger K.E., Baas P.W. Cytoskeletal changes during neurogenesis in cultures of avain neural crest cells. J. Neurocytol. 1996;25:289–301. doi: 10.1007/BF02284803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Saarikangas J., Hakanen J., Mattila P.K., Grumet M., Salminen M., Lappalainen P. ABBA regulates plasma-membrane and actin dynamics to promote radial glia extension. J. Cell Sci. 2008;121:1444–1454. doi: 10.1242/jcs.027466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Vaillend C., Poirier R., Laroche S. Genes, plasticity and mental retardation. Behav. Brain Res. 2008;192:88–105. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Bettencourt da Cruz A., Schwarzel M., Schulze S., Niyyati M., Heisenberg M., Kretzschmar D. Disruption of the MAP1B-related protein FUTSCH leads to changes in the neuronal cytoskeleton, axonal transport defects, and progressive neurodegeneration in Drosophila. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2005;16:2433–2442. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E04-11-1004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Cornish K.M., Kogan C., Turk J., Manly T., James N., Mills A., Dalton A. The emerging fragile X premutation phenotype: evidence from the domain of social cognition. Brain Cogn. 2005;57:53–60. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.08.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Bailey D.B., Jr, Raspa M., Bishop E., Holiday D. No change in the age of diagnosis for Fragile X Syndrome: Findings from a national parent survey. Pediatrics. 2009;124:527–533. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-2992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Bourgeois J.A., Coffey S.M., Rivera S.M., Hessl D., Gane L.W., Tassone F., Greco C., Finucane B., Nelson L., Berry-Kravis E., et al. A review of fragile X premutation disorders: expanding the psychiatric perspective. J. Clin. Psychiatry. 2009;70:852–862. doi: 10.4088/JCP.08m04476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Morris J.C., Price A.L. Pathologic correlates of nondemented aging, mild cognitive impairment, and early-stage Alzheimer's disease. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2001;17:101–118. doi: 10.1385/jmn:17:2:101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Krek W., DeCaprio J.A. Cell synchronization. Methods Enzymol. 1995;254:114–124. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(95)54009-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Burke B. Lamins and apoptosis: a two-way street? J. Cell Biol. 2001;153:F5–F7. doi: 10.1083/jcb.153.3.f5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.He L., Fox M.H. Variation of heat shock protein 70 through the cell cycle in HL-60 cells and its relationship to apoptosis. Exp. Cell Res. 1997;232:64–71. doi: 10.1006/excr.1997.3494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Helmbrecht K., Zeise E., Rensing L. Chaperones in cell cycle regulation and mitogenic signal transduction: a review. Cell Prolif. 2000;33:341–365. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2184.2000.00189.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Leehey M., Goetz C., Berry-Kravis E. Neurology. Kyoto, Japan: 2006. 10th International Congress of Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders. [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Adams J.S., Adams P.E., Nguyen D., Brunberg J.A., Tassone F., Zhang W., Koldewyn K., Rivera S.M., Grigsby J., Zhang L., et al. Volumetric brain changes in females with fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS) Neurology. 2007;69:851–859. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000269781.10417.7b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Bourgeois J.A., Farzin F., Brunberg J.A., Tassone F., Hagerman P., Zhang L., Hessl D., Hagerman R. Dementia with mood symptoms in a fragile X premutation carrier with the fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome: clinical intervention with donepezil and venlafaxine. J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2006;18:171–177. doi: 10.1176/jnp.2006.18.2.171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Saluto A., Brussino A., Tassone F., Arduino C., Cagnoli C., Pappi P., Hagerman P., Migone N., Brusco A. An enhanced polymerase chain reaction assay to detect pre- and full mutation alleles of the fragile X mental retardation 1 gene. J. Mol. Diagn. 2005;7:605–612. doi: 10.1016/S1525-1578(10)60594-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Fernandez-Carvajal I., Walichiewicz P., Xiaosen X., Pan R., Hagerman P.J., Tassone F. Screening for expanded alleles of the FMR1 gene in blood spots from newborn males in a Spanish population. J. Mol. Diagn. 2009;11:324–329. doi: 10.2353/jmoldx.2009.080173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Tassone F., Hagerman R.J., Taylor A.K., Gane L.W., Godfrey T.E., Hagerman P.J. Elevated levels of FMR1 mRNA in carrier males: a new mechanism of involvement in the fragile-X syndrome. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2000;66:6–15. doi: 10.1086/302720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Rasband W.S. Bethesda, MD: 1997–2007. U.S. National Institutes of Health. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

[Supplementary Data]
ddp497_index.html (687B, html)
ddp497_1.pdf (120KB, pdf)

Articles from Human Molecular Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES