Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1988 Feb;85(4):1317–1321. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.4.1317

Spatial pattern representation and transformation in monkey somatosensory cortex.

J R Phillips 1, K O Johnson 1, S S Hsiao 1
PMCID: PMC279758  PMID: 3422492

Abstract

Embossed letters, used previously in pattern recognition experiments in humans, were used to study the spatial patterns of neural activity evoked in peripheral fibers and cortical neurons in areas 3b and 1 of the primary somatosensory cortex of alert rhesus (Macaca mulatta) monkeys. The object was to investigate the representation and transformation of spatial information during the early stages of peripheral and cortical neural processing. Our method consisted of sweeping each letter of the alphabet across the skin repeatedly and constructing a two-dimensional plot (called a spatial event plot) of the action potentials evoked in afferent fibers and cortical neurons. By using this method, slowly and rapidly adapting primary afferents were shown to transmit isomorphic neural images of the letters. Although the slowly adapting images were more spatially acute, both populations conveyed images of sufficient quality to account for human psychophysical performance. In the cortical areas studied, the slowly adapting neurons of area 3b stood out for the acuity, complexity, and variety of their responses. Some of the spatial event plots for these neurons were isomorphic and at least as acute as those obtained from any primary afferent. Others were highly structured but nonisomorphic. The quality and variety of responses in area 3b slowly adapting neurons suggest that they play an important role in the processing of information underlying tactual pattern recognition. The rapidly adapting neurons of area 3b and all types of neurons in area 1 yield much less structured and differentiated responses.

Full text

PDF
1317

Images in this article

1319Image
on p.1319
1319Image
on p.1319
1320Image
on p.1320
1320Image
on p.1320

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barlow H. B. Single units and sensation: a neuron doctrine for perceptual psychology? Perception. 1972;1(4):371–394. doi: 10.1068/p010371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blakemore C., Campbell F. W. On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images. J Physiol. 1969 Jul;203(1):237–260. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carlson M. Characteristics of sensory deficits following lesions of Brodmann's areas 1 and 2 in the postcentral gyrus of Macaca mulatta. Brain Res. 1981 Jan 12;204(2):424–430. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(81)90602-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Creutzfeldt O. D., Nothdurft H. C. Representation of complex visual stimuli in the brain. Naturwissenschaften. 1978 Jun;65(6):307–318. doi: 10.1007/BF00368371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Darian-Smith I., Johnson K. O., Dykes R. "Cold" fiber population innervating palmar and digital skin of the monkey: responses to cooling pulses. J Neurophysiol. 1973 Mar;36(2):325–346. doi: 10.1152/jn.1973.36.2.325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Darian-Smith I., Kenins P. Innervation density of mechanoreceptive fibres supplying glabrous skin of the monkey's index finger. J Physiol. 1980 Dec;309:147–155. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Darian-Smith I., Sugitani M., Heywood J., Karita K., Goodwin A. Touching textured surfaces: cells in somatosensory cortex respond both to finger movement and to surface features. Science. 1982 Nov 26;218(4575):906–909. doi: 10.1126/science.7134982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Johansson R. S., Vallbo A. B. Tactile sensibility in the human hand: relative and absolute densities of four types of mechanoreceptive units in glabrous skin. J Physiol. 1979 Jan;286:283–300. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Johnson K. O., Lamb G. D. Neural mechanisms of spatial tactile discrimination: neural patterns evoked by braille-like dot patterns in the monkey. J Physiol. 1981 Jan;310:117–144. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Johnson K. O., Phillips J. R. Tactile spatial resolution. I. Two-point discrimination, gap detection, grating resolution, and letter recognition. J Neurophysiol. 1981 Dec;46(6):1177–1192. doi: 10.1152/jn.1981.46.6.1177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. LaMotte R. H., Mountcastle V. B. Capacities of humans and monkeys to discriminate vibratory stimuli of different frequency and amplitude: a correlation between neural events and psychological measurements. J Neurophysiol. 1975 May;38(3):539–559. doi: 10.1152/jn.1975.38.3.539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. MOUNTCASTLE V. B., POWELL T. P. Neural mechanisms subserving cutaneous sensibility, with special reference to the role of afferent inhibition in sensory perception and discrimination. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp. 1959 Oct;105:201–232. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Merzenich M. M., Kaas J. H., Sur M., Lin C. S. Double representation of the body surface within cytoarchitectonic areas 3b and 1 in "SI" in the owl monkey (Aotus trivirgatus). J Comp Neurol. 1978 Sep 1;181(1):41–73. doi: 10.1002/cne.901810104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mountcastle V. B., Lynch J. C., Georgopoulos A., Sakata H., Acuna C. Posterior parietal association cortex of the monkey: command functions for operations within extrapersonal space. J Neurophysiol. 1975 Jul;38(4):871–908. doi: 10.1152/jn.1975.38.4.871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. POWELL T. P., MOUNTCASTLE V. B. The cytoarchitecture of the postcentral gyrus of the monkey Macaca mulatta. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp. 1959 Sep;105:108–131. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Phillips J. R., Johnson K. O., Browne H. M. A comparison of visual and two modes of tactual letter resolution. Percept Psychophys. 1983 Sep;34(3):243–249. doi: 10.3758/bf03202952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Phillips J. R., Johnson K. O. Tactile spatial resolution. III. A continuum mechanics model of skin predicting mechanoreceptor responses to bars, edges, and gratings. J Neurophysiol. 1981 Dec;46(6):1204–1225. doi: 10.1152/jn.1981.46.6.1204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pons T. P., Garraghty P. E., Friedman D. P., Mishkin M. Physiological evidence for serial processing in somatosensory cortex. Science. 1987 Jul 24;237(4813):417–420. doi: 10.1126/science.3603028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pons T. P., Wall J. T., Garraghty P. E., Cusick C. G., Kaas J. H. Consistent features of the representation of the hand in area 3b of macaque monkeys. Somatosens Res. 1987;4(4):309–331. doi: 10.3109/07367228709144612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Randolph M., Semmes J. Behavioral consequences of selective subtotal ablations in the postcentral gyrus of Macaca mulatta. Brain Res. 1974 Apr 12;70(1):55–70. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(74)90211-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Talbot W. H., Darian-Smith I., Kornhuber H. H., Mountcastle V. B. The sense of flutter-vibration: comparison of the human capacity with response patterns of mechanoreceptive afferents from the monkey hand. J Neurophysiol. 1968 Mar;31(2):301–334. doi: 10.1152/jn.1968.31.2.301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Warren S., Hamalainen H. A., Gardner E. P. Coding of the spatial period of gratings rolled across the receptive fields of somatosensory cortical neurons in awake monkeys. J Neurophysiol. 1986 Sep;56(3):623–639. doi: 10.1152/jn.1986.56.3.623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES