Abstract
Various patterns of calcifications occur in the breast; some benign, some malignant. A knowledge of these patterns on mammography helps in accurate interpretation and management.
Keywords: Benign calcifications, microcalcifications, wire localization, malignant calcifications
Introduction
Microcalcifications can be the early and only presenting sign of breast cancer. Mammography is used worldwide to detect microcalcifications. Hence, with the help of mammography, we can not only diagnose cancer in a nonpalpable stage but can also detect the extent of the disease. It is very essential to perform a proper evaluation of various calcifications to decide whether they are benign or malignant. A biopsy can be avoided if the calcifications appear absolutely benign on mammography and the patient can be followed-up with annual screening mammography.
In 1913, a German surgeon, Solomon, reported the presence of microcalcifications in the radiographic examination of a mastectomy specimen. In 1949, Leborgne, a radiologist, postulated that the presence of microcalcifications may be the only mammographic manifestation of a carcinoma.[1] Since then, all radiologists have made active efforts to look for microcalcifications in mammograms and this in turn over the years has resulted in a significant improvement in the resolution and performance of the mammography machines.
To detect microcalcifications efficiently, a good mammography machine should have:
dedicated mammography grids,
a small focal spot and
a proper source image distance
In addition, the following are necessary:
Magnification. Every area of microcalcifications should be magnified.
Proper processing of the mammography films should be performed, with longer processing times as compared to conventional radiography.
The use of a magnifying glass, which helps in better visualization, is a must.
A dedicated mammography viewing box (more than 3000 nit) should be used.
There should be very little (<50 lux) ambient light in the room.
A computed-aided diagnosis (CAD) system is useful when evaluating a large volume of examinations, although CAD systems may sometimes fail to pick up amorphous calcifications.[2]
Full-field digital mammography machines are better than film-screen mammography machines for diagnosing microcalcifications. High-resolution computer radiography (CR) machines cannot detect microcalcifications efficiently.[3]
Once calcifications are detected, they have to be described and categorized according to the lexicon mentioned in BI-RADS (Breast Imaging Reporting And Data System) so that the radiologist, the surgeon and the pathologist share a common language. BI-RADS, developed by the American college of Radiology, is followed worldwide to describe and categorize breast abnormalities.
In the chapter titled ‘Lexicons’ in the official BI-RADS publication, calcifications are described according to their appearance and distribution.
According to appearance
Calcifications that are typically benign are described as follows:[5]
Eggshell or rim-like calcifications:
These are thin, round, rim-like calcifications often seen in the walls of cysts or in fat necrosis [Figure 1].
Figure 1.

Mammogram shows rim/egg-shell calcification (arrow)
Coarse and popcorn-like calcifications:
These are calcifications seen within degenerating fibroadenomas [Figure 2A and B].
Figure 2 (A,B):

Mammograms show degenerating fibroadenomas with coarse (arrow in A) and popcorn (arrow in B) calcification
Vascular calcifications:
These are also described as railroad track calcifications, showing a linear configuration, either singly or in parallel pairs [Figure 3]. When small, single and linear, these calcifications should be differentiated from malignant calcifications.
Figure 3.

Mammogram shows linear, railroad track calcification (arrows), consistent with vascular calcification
Large, rod-like calcifications or secretory deposits:
These are due to secretory disease. The calcific foci are thick and follow the ducts, toward the nipple [Figure 4].
Figure 4.

Mammogram shows thick, large, rod-like calcific foci (arrows) due to secretory disease
Milk of calcium:
These are seen as tiny, teacup-shaped calcifications, situated within small cysts on the lateral view [Figure 5]. Sometimes, the small, rounded soft-tissue shadow of the cyst itself is also appreciated.
Figure 5.

Lateral mammogram shows milk of calcium with layering (arrow)
Lucent-centered calcifications:
These are rounded calcifications with a lucent center usually representing dermal calcifications [Figure 6A]. Larger calcifications with lucent centers may be due to oil cysts/fat necrosis and may follow surgery or trauma [Figure 6B].
Figure 6 (A,B):

Mammogram (A) shows a lucent-centered focus (arrow) of dermal calcification. Mammogram (B) shows a larger, lucent-centered oil cyst (arrow)
Calcifications that are of intermediate concern
Amorphous calcifications:
These are very tiny, hazy calcifications [Figure 7] and are often difficult to pick up on CR machines.
Figure 7.

Mammogram shows amorphous calcifications (arrow). A hook-wire localization (arrowhead) was performed; the histopathology report did not show any malignancy
Calcifications that are highly suspicious for malignancy
Fine, linear, branching or casting calcifications:
These are linear, rod-like calcifications and are typically seen in malignancy [Figure 8].
Figure 8.

Mammogram shows fine, linear, branching calcifications (arrows), typical of malignancy
Pleomorphic calcifications:
These are microcalcifications of varying shapes and sizes [Figure 9].
Figure 9.

Mammogram shows pleomorphic calcifications (arrows) in this patient with a ductal carcinoma
According to distribution
Grouped or clustered:
These are five or more than five calcifications seen in a small area of 1 cm3 [Figure 10] and may be seen in benign or malignant conditions. If the cluster is a loose cluster (< 10/cm2), it is more likely to represent a benign condition, whereas a compact cluster (>20/cm2) is more likely to be due to malignant disease.[6]
Figure 10.

Mammogram shows clustered microcalcifications (arrows)
Linear, segmental:
These are suspicious calcifications arranged in a line or showing a branching pattern, suggesting deposits in a duct [Figure 11]. They tend to be distributed in a linear manner because most common malignancies are ductal, beginning in the terminal ducts.
Figure 11 (A,B):

Mediolateral oblique mammogram (A) and magnified view (B) show segmental calcifications
Regional:
Calcifications are seen in a large volume, not necessarily conforming to a duct; more likely to be benign.
Diffuse or scattered:
These calcifications are seen all over the breast and may be bilateral [Figure 12]. They are almost always benign.
Figure 12.

Craniocaudal mammograms of both breasts show benign, diffusely scattered microcalcifications (arrows)
In conclusion, with the help of morphology and distribution, calcifications can be categorized into benign, of intermediate-concern, and malignant types. It would be more appropriate to categorize them with the help of BI-RADS into 2, 3, 4 and 5.[7] The egg shell, popcorn, lucent-centered, dermal, vascular calcifications, milk of calcium and scattered calcifications are definitely benign and can be categorized as BI-RADS 2. They do not need biopsy or follow-up.
Those of intermediate concern can be categorized into 3 and should be closely monitored. Pleomorphic and casting-type calcifications are categorized as BI-RADS 4 or 5 and a biopsy is recommended. In case follow-up is advised, it should be kept in mind that some microcalcifications, sometimes even of DCIS, can remain unchanged for years. Some calcifications are even known to resolve.[8]
Footnotes
Source of Support: Nil
Conflict of Interest: None declared.
References
- 1.Leborgne R. Diagnosis of tumours of breast by simple roentgenography: Calcifications in carcinoma. AJR. 1951;65:1–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Soo MS, Rosen EL, Xia JQ, Ghate S, Baker JA. Computer aided detection of amorphous calcifications. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184:887–92. doi: 10.2214/ajr.184.3.01840887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Rong XJ, Shaw CC, Johnston DA, Lemacks MR, Liu X, Whitman GJ, et al. Microcalcificationdetectibility for four mammographic detectors: Flat panel, CCD, CR and screen film. Med Phys. 2002;29:2052–61. doi: 10.1118/1.1500768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gülsün M, Demirkazik FB, Ariyürek M. Evaluation of breast microcalcifications according to breast imaging reporting and data system criteria and Le Gal's classification. Eur J Radiol. 2003;47:227–31. doi: 10.1016/s0720-048x(02)00181-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Monsees BS. Evaluation of breast microcalcifications. Radiol Clin North Am. 1995;33:1109–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Park JM, Choi HK, Bae SJ, Lee MS, Ahn SH, Gong G. Clustering of breast microcalcifications: revisited. Clin Radiol. 2000;55:114–8. doi: 10.1053/crad.1999.0220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Seymour H, Given-Wilson R, Wilkinson L, Cooke J. Resolving breast microcalcifications. Radiographics. 2000;20:307–8. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.20.2.g00mc37307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Burnside ES, Ochsner JE, Fowler KJ, Fine JP, Salkowski LR, Rubin DL, et al. Use of Microcalcification Descriptors in BI-RADS 4th edition to stratify risk of malignancy. Radiology. 2007;242:388–95. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2422052130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
