Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1988 Apr;85(7):2196–2199. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.7.2196

On the advantage of being different: Nest predation and the coexistence of bird species

Thomas E Martin 1
PMCID: PMC279956  PMID: 16593919

Abstract

A long-standing debate in ecology centers on identifying the processes that determine which species coexist in a local community. Partitioning of resources, where species differ in resource use, is often thought to reflect the primary role of competition in determining coexistence of species. However, in theory predation can favor similar patterns. This theory premises that predators increase their search intensity with increasing density of prey. One set of experiments reported here supports this premise based on predators that search for bird nests. A second set of experiments documents that predation rates are lower when nest sites are partitioned among different sites than when the same number of nests are placed in similar sites. Moreover, predation rates on experimental nests are more similar to rates on real nests when experimental nests are partitioned among different sites. These results provide support for a hypothesis that nest predation is a process that can favor coexistence of bird species that partition resources, where nest sites are the resources.

Keywords: community structure, density-dependent predation, resource partitioning, search images

Full text

PDF
2196

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Holt R. D. Predation, apparent competition, and the structure of prey communities. Theor Popul Biol. 1977 Oct;12(2):197–129. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(77)90042-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Lewis A. C. Memory Constraints and Flower Choice in Pieris rapae. Science. 1986 May 16;232(4752):863–865. doi: 10.1126/science.232.4752.863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ricklefs R. E. Community diversity: relative roles of local and regional processes. Science. 1987 Jan 9;235(4785):167–171. doi: 10.1126/science.235.4785.167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Schoener T. W. Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science. 1974 Jul 5;185(4145):27–39. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4145.27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Schoener T. W., Spiller D. A. Effect of lizards on spider populations: manipulative reconstruction of a natural experiment. Science. 1987 May 22;236(4804):949–952. doi: 10.1126/science.236.4804.949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES