Abstract
The balance between the products of L-arginine metabolism in macrophages regulates the outcome of Leishmania major infection. L-arginine can be oxidized by host inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) to produce nitric oxide (NO), which contributes to parasite killing. In contrast, L-arginine hydrolysis by host arginase blocks NO generation and provides polyamines, which can support parasite proliferation. Additionally, Leishmania encode their own arginase which has considereable potential to modulate infectivity and disease pathogenesis. Here, we compare the infectivity and impact on host cellular immune response in vitro and in vivo of wild-type (WT) L. major with that of a parasite arginase null mutant (arg-). We found that arg- L. major are impaired in their macrophage infectivity in vitro independent of host iNOS activities. As with in vitro results, the proliferation of arg- L. major in animal infections was also significantly impaired in vivo resulting in delayed onset of lesion development, attenuated pathology and low parasite burden. Despite this attenuated pathology, the production of cytokines by cells from the draining lymph node of mice infected with WT and arg- L. major was similar at all times tested. Interestingly, in vitro and in vivo arginase levels were significantly lower in arg- than in WT infected cases and were directly correlated with parasite numbers inside infected cells. These results suggest that Leishmania-encoded arginase enhances disease pathogenesis by augmenting host cellular arginase activities leading and that contrary to previous in vitro studies, the host cytokine response does not influence host arginase activity.
Keywords: Monocytes/macrophages, Th1/Th2 cells, parasitic-protozoan, cytokines, nitric oxide
Introduction
Cutaneous Leishmaniasis is a spectral disease caused by the intracellular protozoan parasite Leishmania major. Although the disease is endemic in tropical and subtropical countries, international tourism, migration and military operations in endemic regions have increased the number of imported cases to low-prevalence areas, particularly in the western countries (1).
After inoculation into the host by the sand fly, the promastigotes are rapidly phagocytosed by macrophages where they differentiate into amastigotes. Following phagocytosis, one of two opposing forms of macrophage activation will occur (classical or alternative), resulting in differential L-arginine metabolism by two key enzymes: inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and arginase (2, 3). Arginase hydrolyzes L-arginine to form urea and ornithine, which results in alternative macrophage activation (4). Ornithine is an essential substrate for the synthesis of polyamines, which are essential nutrients for growth and proliferation of cells including Leishmania parasites (3, 5-8). Classical macrophage activation occurs when iNOS oxidizes L-arginine to nitric oxide (NO) in a two-step process with hydroxy-arginine (OH-arg) and citrulline as intermediates (4). NO is a potent cytotoxin involved in clearance or inhibition of a variety of intracellular pathogens including Leishmania (3, 5, 7, 8). Since the two enzymes compete for the availability of arginine (4, 9), activation of one results in down-regulation of the other directly or indirectly through their intermediate products. For example, OH-arg is a powerful arginase inhibitor (3); and treatment of L. major-infected mice with its synthetic analog Nω-hydroxy-L-arginine (NOHA), causes a 4-fold reduction in lesion size and as much as 4 million fold reduction in parasite burden (5).
Leishmania major-infected mice mimic several forms of the human disease: healing and non-healing disease occurs depending on the mouse strain. Resistant strains (e.g. C57BL/6J, CBA) produce a Th1 response to infection characterized by high levels of IFN-γ and TNF-α. These cytokines activate macrophages classically to produce NO via iNOS thereby facilitating parasite killing (6, 10). As a result, cutaneous lesions in these strains completely heal and the mice acquire life-long immunity dependent on the presence of persistent parasites. In contrast, susceptible strains (e.g. BALB/c) produce a Th2 response to infection characterized by high levels of IL-4, IL-13 and IL-10 (5, 11-14). The Th2 cytokines increase host cellular arginase activity (3, 5) resulting in alternative macrophage activation (3, 5, 6, 15) and enhanced production of polyamines for parasite growth and proliferation (3, 8).
It is widely believed that the susceptibility of BALB/c mice to L. major is due to the production of high amounts of IL-4 by their CD4+ T cells, which increases macrophage arginase activity. This promotes availability of large amounts of polyamines favoring extensive parasite proliferation leading to uncontrolled pathology (16-20). Notably, Leishmania organisms encode an active arginase that may potentially impact on the host immune response and disease pathogenesis (6, 21). Leishmania arginase (ARG), which is about 50% identical to its mammalian homolog (11), is essential for parasite survival in vitro in axenic conditions because the survival and proliferation of arginase deficient parasites is dramatically compromised in the absence of exogenously supplied polyamines (6, 21). Importantly, a previous report using L. mexicana arginase null mutant showed that parasite-derived arginase are attenuated in vivo, due in part to increased nitric oxide production resulting from presumably increased L-arginine bioavailability for iNOS (22).
Although both Old and New World Leishmania cause the same spectrum of disease collectively known as cutaneous Leishmaniasis, their pathobiologies are remarkably different. For instance, the parasitophorous vacuoles of L. major are narrow and usually contain one parasite per vacuole whereas those of L. mexicana are very spacious and contain many amastigotes (23). Furthermore, whereas L. major causes acute and rapidly growing lesion in mice, the lesions of L. mexicana take a longer time to develop, are very slow in progression and do not ulcerate and the nature of host immune response is different (24). Importantly, recent reports show that the functional consequences of genetic ablation of key conserved genes such as LPG2 are different in L. major and L. mexicana (25).
In the present study, we investigated the role of L. major-derived arginase in infectivity, parasite proliferation and disease pathogenesis in vitro and in vivo. Similar to L. mexicana arg- (22), we show that deficiency of L. major-derived arginase severely impaired their survival and proliferation in macrophages in vitro and in vivo, resulting in delayed disease onset, reduced pathology and lower parasite burden. In contrast to L. mexicana arg-, this impairment was not due to overproduction of nitric oxide in L. major arg--infected cells. Paradoxically, despite the dramatic differences in disease pathology, there was no significant difference in the kinetics, pattern and quality of cytokine responses induced by WT and arg- parasites. Collectively, these results show that the influence of parasite-derived arginase on disease severity is not related to its modulatory effect on the host immune response. They further suggest that contrary to popular belief, the host cellular arginase activity in L. major-infected mice may not be regulated by cytokines as previously proposed.
Methods and Materials
Mice
Six to eight week old female BALB/c mice were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Montreal, Canada) or Central Animal Care Services, University of Manitoba. All mouse experiments were approved by the University of Manitoba Animal Care Committee in accordance with the regulation of the Canadian Council on Animal Care.
Parasites and infection
All parasites were derived from the wild-type Leishmania major line LV39cl5 (RHO/SU/59/P). Homozygous null mutant derivatives lacking the LPG2 Golgi GDP-mannose transporter (lpg2-) were described previously (26). The generation and biochemical characteristics of homozygous null mutants lacking arginase Δarg::HYG/Δarg::PAC, referred to as arg-, and its complemented line Δarg::HYG/Δarg::PAC/+pXG-ARG (referred to arg- /+ARG) are described elsewhere (21). Parasites were grown at 25°C in M199 medium (Hyclone, Logan, UT) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS, 2 μg/ml biopterin, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, 5 μg/ml hemin, 1 μg/ml biotin, 0.1mM adenine, 40 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 20 mM L-glutamine and 50 mM Putrescine (for arg- L. major). All media additives were purchased from Sigma-/Aldrich (Oakville, ON, Canada). For infection, 7-day stationary phase promastigotes were washed three times in PBS and 5 million parasites (suspended in 50 μl PBS) were injected into the right hind footpad. After infection, the development and progression of footpad lesion was monitored weekly by measuring the diameter of infected footpad with calipers.
Estimation of parasites burden
At various times, mice were sacrificed and parasite burden in the footpads of infected mice was quantified by limiting dilution analysis as previously described (27, 28).
In vitro recall response and intracellular cytokine determination
At sacrifice, single cell suspensions of lymph nodes draining the infection site (dLN) were cultured in complete medium (DMEM supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS, 2 mM glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin), in 24-well tissue culture plates (Falcon, VWR Edmonton, AB, Canada). Cells were stimulated with or without soluble leishmanial antigen (SLA, 50 μg/ml) for 72 hr and the culture supernatants were collected and stored at −20 °C until assayed for cytokines by ELISA. Some cells were stimulated with PMA (50 ng/ml), ionomycin (500 ng/ml) and BFA (10 μg/ml) for 4-6 hr and used for intracellular cytokine staining (IL-4, IL-10 and IFN-γ) as previously described (29).
Cytokine ELISAs and measurement of nitric oxide
The levels of IL-4, IL-13, IL-10 and IFN-γ in dLN culture supernatants were determined by sandwich ELISA using antibody (Ab) pairs from eBiosciences (San Diego, CA) according to the manufacturer’s suggested protocols. In some experiments, IL-10 levels in culture supernatant fluids were measured by cytometrix bead array using Cytomix Bead Kit (Benders, Montreal Biotec, Montreal, QC, Canada) according to manufacturer’s suggested protocols. Nitric oxide levels in culture supernatants of BMDMs were measured at 24, 48 and 72 hours post infection by the Griess assay as previously described (30). In some experiments, NO was also measured in 3-day culture supernatant fluids of lymph node cells from infected mice.
In vitro infection of bone marrow derived (BMDM) and peritoneal macrophages
Bone marrow cells were isolated from the femur and tibia of mice and differentiated into bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) as described previously (31). Briefly, after depletion of erythrocytes with ACK lysis buffer (150 mM NH4Cl, 10 mM KHCO3, 0.1 mM Na2EDTA), marrow cells were resuspended in macrophage medium (complete DMEM containing 30% L929 cell supernatant), seeded in Petri dishes at 4 ×105/ml (10 ml/Petri dish) and allowed to differentiate at 37°C in CO2 incubator. The culture media were changed at day 3 and adherent macrophages were harvested by gentle scraping on day 7, washed, resuspended in complete medium (106/ml) and used for in vitro experiments.
Peritoneal macrophage cells were obtained by injecting 10 ml of RPMI 1640 medium (GIBCO Life Technologies, Burlington, ON, Canada) into the peritoneal cavity of euthanized mice using a 21-gauge needle. The peritoneal cavity was rocked gently several times for about 3 minutes and the media was aspirated into a syringe. The cell suspension was washed, counted and resuspended at 106/ml in complete medium for use in experiments.
For infection, aliquots (500 μl) of BMDMs or peritoneal cells in 5 ml polypropylene tubes were incubated with stationary phase promastigote parasites (day 7) at a ratio of 1:10 (cell : parasite). After 6 hr, the free parasites were washed away with fresh medium (spun at 500 rpm for 5 min, 3 ×) and infected cells were cultured in complete medium in the presence or absence of IFN-γ (100 U/ml) and LPS (10 μg/ml). At different times after infection, cytospin preparations were made, stained with Giemsa and infection was determined by microscopy.
Arginase Activity Assay
Arginase activity in vitro was quantified as previously described (32). One unit of enzyme activity is defined as the amount of enzyme that converts L-arginine to 1 μM urea/min. For in vivo arginase activity assay, infected feet were rinsed in chlorhexiderm and ethanol and homogenized by hand in PBS containing 2% Pen/Strep. The homogenate was first centrifuged at low speed (500 rpm for 5 min) to remove large tissue debris and the supernatant was then centrifuged again at high speed (3000 rpm for 15 min) to pellet the cells and amastigotes. Both pellets were incubated for 30 min in 2 ml lysis buffer (0.1 M Tris-HCl, 300 μM NaCl, 1 μM PMSF, 1% TritonX) and the lysate was assayed for arginase as previously described (32).
Prostaglandin Assay
Prostaglandin E2 was measured in lymph cell culture supernatant using a competitive ELISA kit from Cayman Chemicals (Ann Arbor, MI) by following the manufacturer’s directions. The sensitivity of the assay is 15 pg/ml.
Statistical analysis
A two-tailed Student’s t-test or analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare means of lesion sizes, parasites burden, and cytokine production from different groups of mice. Correlation statistics were analyzed by Pearson’s correlation at the 95% confidence interval. Significance was considered if p < 0.05.
Results
Lack of parasite-derived arginase compromises L. major proliferation inside macrophages in vitro
Previous studies using the host specific arginase inhibitor NOHA demonstrated the dependence of L. major on exogenous (host cell-derived) polyamines for intracellular proliferation and growth in vitro (3, 5, 7, 8). Since Leishmania arginase is also sensitive to this inhibitor, to establish more directly the role of parasite arginase we studied an arginase Leishmania major null mutant (arg-) created previously by homologous gene replacement (21). We infected bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDM) or peritoneal macrophages with wild type (WT), arg- or complemented (arg-/+ARG) L. major, and monitored infection progression by microscopy at set times post-infection. Consistently, at six hours post-infection, the number of parasites per infected cell and the percentage of infected cells were the same regardless of whether the cells were infected with arg- or WT parasites (Fig. 1A and B). Similar results were obtained with peritoneal macrophages (Fig. 1C and D). Therefore, even in the absence of endogenous arginase, L. major parasites retain the ability to invade macrophages. However, beyond the initial cell invasion, subsequent survival and/or proliferation of arg- parasites decreased dramatically in infected cells such that by 72 hr post-infection, the percent infectivity and number of arg- parasites per infected cells were reduced by as much as 50% and 60%, respectively compared to WT parasites (Fig. 1A-D). The failure to survive and/or proliferate in infected macrophages was specific to the arg- mutation, as restoration of arginase expression (arg-/+ARG, ‘add back’ parasites) restored their ability to proliferate in infected cells, to levels similar to WT parasites (Fig. 1A and B). Taken together, these results indicate that the absence of parasite-derived arginase significantly impaired but did not completely abolish in vitro macrophage invasion by L. major.
FIGURE 1.
Leishmania major proliferation and/or survival inside infected macrophages is impaired in the absence of parasite-derived arginase. Bone marrow derived macrophages (A and B) and non-elicited peritoneal macrophages (C and D) were infected in polypropylene tubes with wild type (WT) or arginase deficient (arg-) L. major promastigotes (MOI 1:10; macrophage to parasite ration). After 6 hr, free parasites were washed away with medium by 3 cycles of low speed centrifugation (see materials and methods) and the cells were resuspended in 500 μl of fresh medium and incubated at 37 °C. At various times post-infection, slides were prepared by cytospin and stained with Giemsa. Slides were analyzed under a microscope at 1000X magnification to estimate infection levels. Each point is the mean ± SE of 3 slides. Data are presented as mean ± SE and is a representative of 3 different experiments with similar results. * p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001.
arg- L. major-infected BMDM show decreased arginase activity in vitro
It has been previously shown that increasing host cellular arginase levels enhances proliferation of L. major in vitro (3, 5, 7, 8). Since proliferation of arg- L. major was impaired in infected cells, we hypothesized that the expression of parasite-derived arginase may function to increase total intracellular arginase activity leading to increased polyamine availability for the parasites. Therefore, we next quantified the effect of parasite-derived arginase on total cellular arginase activity. Figure 2A shows the changes in arginase activity in BMDMs 24 and 144 hours post-infection with WT and arg- L. major. At 24 hours post-infection, there was no significant difference in arginase activity between any of the groups. Differences in arginase activity became apparent from 72 hours post-infection, which corresponds to the onset of significant differences in parasite proliferation in vitro (see Fig. 1). By 144 hours post infection, arginase activity in WT L. major-infected cells was as much as 3-4 times higher than in arg- L. major-infected cells, and 5 times greater than cells alone (Fig. 2A).
FIGURE 2.
Infection with arg- L. major decreases host cellular arginase activity in vitro without affecting nitric oxide production. Bone marrow derived macrophages were infected with WT or arg- L. major as in Fig. 1 above and the free parasites were washed away after 6 hrs. In some experiments, the infected cells were stimulated with rIL-4 (20 ng/ml). At the indicated time, the cells were lysed with Triton X and the total arginase activity was determined as described in the materials and methods (A and B). Data presented in Fig. 2B were obtained at 96 hr, but similar results were also obtained at 72 hr. Some infected cells were stimulated with LPS (10 μg/ml) or LPS + IFN-γ (100 Units) and nitrite levels in culture supernatant fluids were determined using the Griess assay method at 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours (only 24 and 96 hr are shown here) post-infection. Data are presented as mean ± SE and is a representative of 3-4 different experiments with similar results. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001.
Previous reports indicate that host cellular arginase level is regulated by T cell-derived cytokines, particularly IL-4 (10, 12, 13, 17, 33). Consistent with these reports, addition of IL-4 into the cultures increased arginase levels in all treatment groups (by as much as 20 - 80%, Fig. 2B). However, this IL-4-induced increase in arginase levels was not sufficient to overcome the impaired cellular arginase activity in the absence of parasite-derived arginase, such that the total cellular arginase levels in cells infected with arg- L. major + IL-4 were still significantly (p < 0.001) lower than those infected with WT L. major + IL-4 (Fig. 2B). These studies suggest a direct correlation between intracellular parasite proliferation and total cellular arginase activities in vitro, which is independent of IL-4 concentration in cultures of infected cells.
Decreased arginase activity in arg- L. major-infected macrophages does not lead to increased NO production
L-arginine is the common substrate for inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and arginase and thus these enzymes must compete for it in vivo directly or indirectly (4, 10, 12, 34). Thus, we investigated whether the significantly lower arginase activity in arg--infected cells resulted in significantly enhanced iNOS activity, through increased availability for arginine. Therefore, we measured nitrite production (as a function of iNOS activity) by WT and arg- L. major-infected macrophages at different times after infection and after stimulation with LPS or IFN-γ plus LPS. In the absence of inducers, no nitrite was generated. LPS-induced production of nitric oxide by cells infected with WT L. major was slightly but consistently lower than that produced by uninfected cells (Fig. 2C). Surprisingly, despite the observed differences in arginase activity (Fig. 2A and B), there was no significant difference in nitrite levels between cells infected with WT or arg- L. major at all times tested (Fig. 2C, 24 and 96 hr data are shown). Interestingly and consistent with previous reports, stimulation of infected cells with CpG ODN, anti-CD40 or IFN-γ either alone or in combination (anti-CD40 + IFN-γ) did not lead to any detectable NO production (data not shown). These results indicate that the depressed total arginase activities in cells infected with arg- L. major is not accompanied by increased iNOS activities. They further suggest that parasite-derived arginase is not responsible for the suppression of nitric oxide production in L. major-infected cells.
Lack of parasite-derived arginase compromises parasite proliferation in vivo
To discern if the impaired proliferation of arg- parasites in vitro is representative of what happens in a real in vivo infection; we infected BALB/c mice with WT, arg- and add-back (arg-/+ARG) L. major and monitored the onset and progression of lesion development over time. While the arg- parasites were able to induce some pathology (21), our studies showed that the arg- parasites were highly attenuated in vivo (Fig. 3). Visible lesions took up to two weeks longer to develop in these mice, and the pathology did not reach the same level of severity as seen in WT or arg-/+ARG L. major infection (Fig. 3A). However, since at seven weeks the pathology in mice infected with WT parasites was such that we had to euthanize them, the long-term pathology associated with arg- L. major infection remains unclear. We quantified parasite burden in the infected footpad at different times post-infection to get a better picture of the disease process (Fig. 3B). At 7 days post-infection (prior to onset of lesion development), there was no significant difference in parasite titer in mice infected with WT, arg-, or arg-/+ARG parasites (data not shown). However, by 2, 4 and 7 weeks post infection (Fig. 3B), parasite burden in WT and arg-/+ARG L. major-infected footpads was 2 to 3-logs higher than in arg- L. major-infected mice, indicating that without endogenous arginase L. major cannot replicate successfully in vivo. Similar results were observed in C57B6/J mice indicating the result is not mouse strain specific (data not shown). Thus while the arg- parasites were able to survive in mouse infections, they were highly attenuated.
FIGURE 3.
arg- Leishmania major parasites are highly attenuated in vivo. BALB/c mice were infected in the right footpad with 2 million (stationary phase promastigotes) WT, arg- and arg-/+ARG (AB, add-back) and lesion sizes were monitored weekly with calipers (A). At different times after infection (ending at 7 wk due to extensive ulceration in WT-infected controls), mice were sacrificed and parasite burden at the infected footpad was determined by limiting dilution assay. Data are presented as means ± SE and are representative of 4 independent experiments with similar results. * p < 0.05.
Arginase deficient and WT L. major induce similar cytokine responses in vivo
In other knockout constructs of L. major, e.g., lpg2- and dhfr-ts-, attenuated pathology and lower parasite burden are typically associated with low or altered cytokine responses in vivo (35, 36). Therefore, we investigated if the same was true of the arg- parasites. At different times post-infection, we sacrificed WT and arg- L. major-infected mice and determined the production of cytokines (IL-4, IL-10, IL-13 and IFN-γ) by cells from lymph nodes draining the infection site (dLN) by ELISA or flow cytometry. Paradoxically, there was no trend toward a lower immune response by cells from arg- infected mice over the course of infection (Fig. 4A-D). Our results were also confirmed by intracellular cytokine analyses using flow cytometry where there were no significant differences in percentages of IL-4, IL-10 and IFN-γ-producing CD4+ T cells (Fig. 4E-G). Interestingly, pooling of results from 4 independent experiments revealed that infection with arg- L. major induced more IL-4 production than WT parasites at 7 weeks post-infection (Fig. 4B). Thus, despite attenuated pathology, arg- L. major induced comparable cytokine response to WT parasites.
FIGURE 4.
arg- and WT Leishmania major induce comparable immune responses in vivo. At various times after infection, mice were sacrificed and draining lymph nodes were removed, made into single cell suspensions and cultured for 3 days in the presence of soluble Leishmania antigen (SLA, 50 μg/ml). After 72 hr, the culture supernatant fluids were collected and assayed for IFN-γ (A), IL-4 (B), IL-10 (C) and IL-13 (D) by ELISA. Some of the cultures were stimulated with PMA (50 ng/ml) and ionomycin (500 ng/ml) for 4 hr and Brefeldin A (BFA, 10 μg/ml) was added in the last 2 hr to enhance intracellular protein accumulation. The cells were surface stained for CD4 and intracellularly for IFN-γ (E), IL-4 (F) and IL-10 (G). The culture supernatant fluids were also assayed for PGE2 by ELISA using a commercially available kit (H). Data are presented as means ± SE of pools of 4 (A and B), 3 (E and F) and 2 (G) independent experiments, or as a representative of 3 (C) and 2 (D and H) independent experiments with similar results. * p < 0.05; ** , p < 0.01.
arg- L. major elicits decreased Prostaglandin E2 production in vivo
In addition to cytokines, prostaglandins have also been found to increase arginase activity (16, 10). In terms of lesion pathology following L. major infection, the relationship between arginase and prostaglandin, particularly prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), is relevant because arginase plays an important role in wound healing (37). Thus, in the local tissue microenvironment, prostaglandin may increase host arginase activity independently of the adaptive immune response. Therefore, we investigated PGE2 production in cell culture supernatant from the popliteal lymph nodes draining the infection site. At 3 and 14 days post-infection, there was no significant difference in PGE2 production, although there was a trend of higher production by cells from WT L. major-infected mice at 14 days post-infection. By 28 days post infection there was a significant difference (p < 0.05) in PGE2 production whereby WT infection resulted in almost 20 times more PGE2 production than arg- infection (Fig. 4G). Since PGE2 has been shown to influence inflammatory responses (38, 39), this result is not surprising given the significantly lower inflammation in arg- L. major-infected mice.
Parasite number in the infected footpad correlates with arginase activity in vivo
Previous in vivo studies have demonstrated that Th2 cytokines enhance host cellular arginase activities resulting in increased parasite proliferation and disease pathology (5, 7, 8, 10, 15). Given that the IL-4 and IL-10 responses in WT and arg- L. major-infected mice were comparable or even higher (at 7 wk) in mice infected with arg- L. major (Fig. 4B and C), we hypothesized that arginase activities at lesion sites would not be different. Therefore, we determined arginase activity in footpad homogenates of infected mice. There were no significant differences in arginase levels in the footpads of mice infected with WT and arg-L. major through 2 weeks 4 and 7 post-infection (Fig. 5A). In contrast, arginase activity was significantly (p < 0.001) lower in the arg- than WT-infected mice at weeks post-infection, corresponding to the onset of significant differences in cutaneous lesions, and parasite numbers and PGE2 levels (see Fig. 3A, 3B, and 4H). Similar results were also obtained from cells of lymph nodes draining the infection site (Fig. 5D). In contrast and consistent with our in vitro data (Fig. 2C), the production of nitric oxide in culture supernatant from lymph node cells of arg--infected mice was not significantly greater than that of WT infected mice (Fig. 5E). Correlation analysis between parasite titer and arginase activity showed a strong positive correlation between parasite titer and arginase levels in infected mice (r2=0.954, p=0.023; Fig. 5B), suggesting that parasite numbers may directly influence host arginase activity. Since arg- parasites lack arginase, this increase is likely to be of host origin.
FIGURE 5.
Tissue arginase levels at infected site correlate with parasite titer in vivo. BALB/c mice were infected with 2 × 106 WT and arg- L. major and at various times (3 days and 2, 4 and 7 weeks post-infection), mice were sacrificed and the infected footpads were homogenized in buffer (see materials and methods) and parasite burden (see Fig. 3B) and the total arginase activity was determined (A). The parasite burden was compared with in vivo arginase activity using Pearson correlation test (B, p=0.0233 r2=0.9539). In one experiment, additional groups of mice were infected with WT, arg- and Phosphoglycan deficient (lpg2-) L. major and arginase activity in the infected footpad homogenates was determined at 4 wks post-infection (C). Also, culture supernatant fluids of cells from lymph nodes draining the infection site were assessed for arginase (D, wk 4) or nitrite levels (E) as indicated in the materials and methods. Data are presented as means ± SE and are representative of 3 (A and B) and 2 (C-E) independent experiments with similar results. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001.
To further investigate the role of parasite numbers in regulating host arginase activities, we compared arginase levels in mice infected with WT and lpg2- L. major. lpg2- L. major parasites retain arginase, but lack GDP-Golgi mannose transporter required for the synthesis and surface expression of glycoconjugates that are essential for in vitro and in vivo virulence (26, 40). As a result, infection with lpg2- L. major does not induce cutaneous lesion formation or any measurable cytokine response even though low levels of parasite persist at infected sites for years (27, 36). As shown in Fig. 5C and similar to arg- L. major, lpg2- parasites induced significantly (p < 0.01) less arginase levels at the site of infection than WT L. major (over 70% less than WT parasites). Importantly and consistent with previous reports, parasite burden was low and the cytokine response (particularly IL-4, IL-10 and IFN-γ) was very low or undetectable in lpg2- infected mice (data not shown). Together with our in vitro results, these results suggest that parasite number directly or indirectly influences arginase activities, modulating the outcome of L. major infection in mice.
To gain further insight into nitric oxide production in the arg- infected condition, we assessed dLN cells for arginase activity ex vivo. As shown in Figure 5D (four weeks post infection), arginase activity in lymph node cells from arg--infected mice was significantly lower than wild-type infected mice. However, when supernatant from these cultures was analyzed for nitrite formation by Griess assay (Fig. 5E), samples from arg--infected mice were not greater than samples from WT infected mice. These results clearly indicate that reduced pathology in arg--infected mice (shown in Figure 3) is not the result of increased parasite clearance due to a competitive advantage to metabolize L-argnine via the inducible nitric oxide synthetase pathway.
Discussion
Our study demonstrates that parasite-derived arginase enhances infectivity in vitro and disease pathogenesis in vivo. In the in vitro infection, parasite proliferation was significantly reduced in the absence of endogenous parasite-derived arginase but the initial ability to invade macrophages remains unaffected. Furthermore, arginase deficient parasites were unable to induce overall increases in macrophage arginase levels as wild-type parasites. Interestingly, despite the marked increase in arginase activity induced by wild-type L. major infection, there was no significant difference in nitric oxide production suggesting that in infected cells, the additional parasite-derived arginase plays an insignificant role in influencing the competition for L-arginine between arginase and iNOS. Furthermore, the addition of exogenous IL-4 was not sufficient to change the trend of arg- parasites inducing significantly less arginase activity than wild-type parasites, a first indication that some other factor(s) (distinct from cytokines) may be more important in regulating host cellular arginase activity. Importantly, and consistent with the in vitro results, in vivo pathology and parasite burden were significantly reduced in L. major arg- infected mice. Paradoxically, despite this reduction in pathology and parasite burden, cytokine responses were not significantly different between arg- and wild-type L. major-infected mice. Furthermore, despite similar cytokine profiles, the arg- L. major-infected mice had significantly lower arginase activities than wild-type L. major-infected mice, strongly suggesting that cytokine profiles and arginase activity in mice infected with L. major are unrelated.
Because of their intracellular lifestyle, the nature of macrophage activation significantly impacts on the outcome of L. major infection (41). A key factor that regulates the outcome of macrophage activation is the product of L-arginine metabolism, a process that is regulated by the expression of two key enzymes: iNOS and arginase. iNOS is upregulated by Th1 cytokines, notably IFN-γ and TNF-α, while arginase is induced by Th2 cytokines, including IL-4, IL-10 and IL-13. Previous studies suggest that in BALB/c mice infected with L. major, the overproduction of IL-4, IL-10 and IL-13 leads to enhanced arginase activities, production of polyamines, excessive parasite proliferation and uncontrolled disease pathology (3, 7, 8, 13, 16). This increased arginase activity in macrophages is believed to deplete L-arginine availability and competitively inhibit iNOS activity and nitric oxide production. In the present study, we found no relationship between arginase levels at the site of infection and the host cytokine response in the draining lymph nodes in mice infected with WT and arg- parasites. Furthermore, despite significant differences in the total arginase levels, infection with arg- parasites did not result in higher NO levels than WT infection (Figure 5E). Thus, we speculate that impaired parasite growth in cells infected with arg- L. major may be directly related to decreased polyamine availability (due to decreased arginase activity) and is unrelated to compensatory iNOS overactivity and NO production. Similar effects have been observed in mice treated with nor-NOHA, a synthetic analog of arg-OH, which blocks arginase activity in vitro and in vivo (5).
Although we found that addition of rIL-4 significantly enhanced the proliferation of arg- parasites in infected macrophages, this was not enough to rescue them to the level seen in cultures containing WT parasites and rIL-4 (Figure 2). Furthermore, despite the dramatically impaired arginase activities in vivo, the production of both Th1 and Th2 cytokines by cells from the draining lymph nodes of mice infected with arg- L. major was not lower than their WT infected counterparts (Figure 4). Thus, the inability of arg- L. major to proliferate in infected mice could not be accounted for by altered cytokine responses. Instead, we found that parasite burden (and disease pathology) directly correlated with arginase levels in vitro and in vivo. PGE2 production also follows the same trend. It is therefore tempting to hypothesize that parasite-derived arginase may function to enhance the initial survival and proliferation of L. major inside macrophages by increasing local polyamine concentration around the parasitophorous vacuoles thereby enhancing its availability to the parasites. A testable prediction from this hypothesis is that increasing polyamine concentration in macrophage cultures will not be effective in rescuing the growth defects of arg- L. major in vitro. Indeed, Gaur et al., (2007) found that although additional putrescine and ornithine can increase intracellular parasite proliferation, they were unable to rescue the defect of L. mexicana arg- infection. Thus, it appears that there is distinct compartmentalization of responses between what influences the cell as a whole and what influences the intracellular amastigote microenvironment.
Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) is an important mediator of inflammation produced by a variety of immune and non-immune cells during tissue damage (38, 39). One of the products of arginase activity is proline, which is essential for the collagen deposition in wound healing. In the local tissue microenvironment, prostaglandin induction related to lesion development may increase host arginase activity independently of the adaptive immune response but directly related to parasite proliferation. In our study, we found that prostaglandin levels increased substantially in WT infection but remained relatively unchanged in arg- infection (Fig. 4H). We hypothesize that the pathology associated with increasing parasite proliferation induces PGE2 in lesions and that this local PGE2 increases host arginase activity. In the arg- infection, parasite burden and lesion size remain significantly lower than in WT infection over the course of the study. We believe that this lower PGE2 is insufficient to induce host arginase levels similar to those observed in WT infections. These hypotheses can be tested using the PGE2 inhibitor indomethacin with which we would expect to see a decrease in total arginase levels in WT infection. It is conceivable that additional PGE2 may not rescue the proliferation defect of arg- infection just as additional polyamines did not rescue parasite proliferation in vitro.
As previously mentioned, Leishmania parasites also encode their own arginase (6). This arginase bears resemblance to both isoforms found in humans (11) but is distinct from human forms –as evidenced by an inability to detect it in western blots using a human arginase probe (5). In the absence of an exogenous source of polyamines, i.e. growth in cell free media, Leishmania promastigotes are completely dependent on their own arginase for proliferation. Thus, arginase knockout L. major parasites are auxotrophic for polyamines and their precursors (specifically putrescine, ornithine or spermidine) (6). These mutant parasites can proliferate successfully if the growth media is supplemented with polyamines, highlighting the ability of L. major organisms to scavenge polyamines. Importantly, amastigotes of L. amazonensis have also been shown to express parasite-derived arginase at the same levels as promastigotes of this strain (11), suggesting that enzyme levels and activity are not stage specific and that gene expression is maintained when inside the host cell. As with L. amazonensis, we have detected arginase activity in parasites recovered from infected footpads confirming that the gene is expressed by the amastigotes in vivo (data not shown).
The inability of arg- L. mexicana to proliferate in macrophages has been attributed to overall lower arginase activity in host cells, which is in part contributed by the absence of parasite derived arginase resulting in more substrate availability for NO production by the enzyme iNOS (22). This study reported increased NO production in arg--infected macrophages over those produced by WT-infected cells at 48 hours post-infection. Since this study also found no differences in total arginase levels in WT and arg--infected cells at 48 hr post-infection, it is unlikely that the increased nitric oxide production observed at this time in arg--infected cells was due to enhanced iNOS activity resulting from decreased arginase activity (22). Furthermore, we did not observe any increase in NO production (over that induced by WT parasites) in the absence of parasite-derived arginase at any time during in vitro and in vivo infections (Figs. 2C and 5E). Thus, our data are consistent with our conclusion that arginase activity in infected cells or tissues does not influence iNOS activity and the impaired proliferation of arg- L. major is unrelated to increased NO production. Gaur et al. also found that arg- L. mexicana infection induces a type one immune response based on their finding of higher IFN-γ levels and lower IL-4 levels in culture supernatant of cells from arg- infected mice at 4 weeks post-infection compared to WT infection (22). In contrast, we show that the pattern, quality and quantity of cytokine response in WT and arg- L. major-infected mice are similar (and showed lack of predictable dominance of type one over type two immune response or vice versa) over a period of 7 weeks post-infection (Figs. 4A-D). The L. mexicana arg- study investigated the adaptive immune response only at one time point (at 4 weeks) post-infection providing only a snapshot of the response whereas we undertook a systematic kinetic examination of immune response over 7 weeks. In addition to differences in experimental design, it is possible that differences in the biology of New and Old world parasites may also be important. For instance, there are marked differences in the nature of interaction of L. major and L. mexicana with macrophages, particularly in the formation of parasitophorous vacuoles (23). Indeed, differences in virulence following deletion of the glycophosphate conjugates in Leishmania major and Leishmania mexicana have been reported (26, 42).
The metabolism of polyamines (putrescine, spermine, and spermidine) is an integral part of cellular function in all living cells (12). In mammals, the cellular polyamine content correlates with the rate of cell division, and polyamine levels are increased in cancer cells compared to normal cells (12, 15). As in mammals, polyamines are essential for the growth of all Trypanosomatidae. African trypanosomes (including T. brucei and T. congolense) encode most of the mammalian enzymes or their homologs necessary for the biosynthesis of polyamines (12). In contrast, Trypanosoma cruzi, which is closely related to Leishmania, encodes an enzyme, cruzipain, which increases host arginase levels in a cytokine-like manner aiding the uptake and interconversion of putrescine and spermidine from their environment (12, 43, 44). In addition, parasites from other families have been found to possess such arginase effectors; such as the antioxidant thioredoxin peroxidase produced Fasciola hepatica that is shown to induce alternative activation and arginase upregulation in peritoneal macrophages (45). The possession of an antigen capable of increasing host arginase activity is advantageous for the parasites as it provides a larger polyamine pool for optimal parasite proliferation. Our observation of a positive correlation between parasite titer and arginase activity (Fig. 5) suggest that Leishmania major may also produce such a molecule which, combined with parasite-derived arginase, ensures optimal availability of polyamines thereby facilitating efficient intracellular survival.
With respect to the exact role of L. major-derived arginase in de novo polyamine synthesis, we suggest a “take rations for the invasion” hypothesis. The intracellular environment of macrophages is extremely hostile. During the early phase of infection, the newly transformed amastigotes require survival factors to proliferate successfully inside the cell. In the absence of parasite-derived arginase, early proliferation and establishment of L. major parasites may be impaired to such an extent that the addition of exogenous polyamines or cytokines cannot rescue their proliferation to WT levels. Thus, the ability to synthesize polyamines de novo gives L. major a survival advantage during this difficult time. Once a significant number of amastigotes are present in the host, parasite-derived products or exoantigens would be produced in sufficient quantity to sustain the infection. We hypothesize that one or more of these products is a molecule for upregulating host arginase.
In conclusion, we have clearly shown that L. major-derived arginase plays an important role in disease pathogenesis by augmenting host arginase activities leading to efficient parasite proliferation. This effect is unrelated to enhanced iNOS activity and/or NO production. In our kinetic study, we show that adaptive immune response does not predict in vivo arginase activity or vice versa. Thus, we conclude that in mice infected with L. major, the in vivo cytokine responses may be of lesser importance in modulating host cellular arginase activity than parasite numbers. The results further suggest that parasite-derived product(s) or host inflammatory mediators like PGE2 may play important role in modulating host arginase activities in vivo that result in effective intracellular parasite proliferation.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dong Liu for rendering some technical assistance.
3Abbreviations used in this paper
- arg- L. major
arginase gene deficient L. major
- BMDC
Bone marrow-derived dendritic cell
- BMDM
bone marrow-derived macrophage
- DCs
dendritic cells
- dLN
lymph node draining the infection site
- iNOS
inducible nitric oxide synthetase
- NO
nitric oxide
- SLA
soluble leishmanial antigen
- WT
wild-type
Footnotes
Funding for this study was provided by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Manitoba Health Research Council (to JU) and National Institutes of Health (AI29103 and AI31078 to SB). Helen Muleme is supported by the National Training Program in Allergy and Asthma (studentship award), AllerGen NCE and CIHR Canada Graduate Scholarship Master’s Award.
References
- 1.Antinori S, Gianelli E, Calatttini S, Longhi E, Gramiccia M, Corbellino M. Cutaneous leishmaniasis: an increasing threat for travellers. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2005;11:343–346. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2004.01046.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kropf P, Herath S, Weber V, Modolell M, Muller I. Factors influencing Leishmania major infection in IL-4-deficient BALB/c mice. Parasite Immunol. 2003;25:439–447. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.2003.00655.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Iniesta V, Gomez-Nieto LC, Corraliza I. The inhibition of arginase by N(omega)-hydroxy-l-arginine controls the growth of Leishmania inside macrophages. J. Exp. Med. 2001;193:777–784. doi: 10.1084/jem.193.6.777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gordon S. Alternative activation of macrophages. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2003;3:23–35. doi: 10.1038/nri978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kropf P, Fuentes JM, Fahnrich E, Arpa L, Herath S, Weber V, Soler G, Celada A, Modolell M, Muller I. Arginase and polyamine synthesis are key factors in the regulation of experimental leishmaniasis in vivo. FASEB J. 2005;19:1000–1002. doi: 10.1096/fj.04-3416fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Roberts SC, Tancer MJ, Polinsky MR, Gibson KM, Heby O, Ullman B. Arginase plays a pivotal role in polyamine precursor metabolism in Leishmania. Characterization of gene deletion mutants. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:23668–23678. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M402042200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Iniesta V, Carcelen J, Molano I, Peixoto PM, Redondo E, Parra P, Mangas M, Monroy I, Campo ML, Nieto CG, Corraliza I. Arginase I induction during Leishmania major infection mediates the development of disease. Infect. Immun. 2005;73:6085–6090. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.9.6085-6090.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Iniesta V, Gomez-Nieto LC, Molano I, Mohedano A, Carcelen J, Miron C, Alonso C, Corraliza I. Arginase I induction in macrophages, triggered by Th2-type cytokines, supports the growth of intracellular Leishmania parasites. Parasite Immunol. 2002;24:113–118. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3024.2002.00444.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Goerdt S, Politz O, Schledzewski K, Birk R, Gratchev A, Guillot P, Hakiy N, Klemke CD, Dippel E, Kodelja V, Orfanos CE. Alternative versus classical activation of macrophages. Pathobiology. 1999;67:222–226. doi: 10.1159/000028096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Corraliza IM, Soler G, Eichmann K, Modolell M. Arginase induction by suppressors of nitric oxide synthesis (IL-4, IL-10 and PGE2) in murine bone-marrow-derived macrophages. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1995;206:667–673. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1995.1094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.da Silva ER, Castilho TM, Pioker FC, de Paula Silva Tomich, Carlos H, Floeter-Winter LM. Genomic organisation and transcription characterisation of the gene encoding Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis arginase and its protein structure prediction. Int. J. Parasitol. 2002;32:727–737. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7519(02)00002-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bacchi CJ, Yarlett N. Polyamine metabolism as chemotherapeutic target in protozoan parasites. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2002;2:553–563. doi: 10.2174/1389557023405549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Alexander J, Brombacher F, McGachy HA, McKenzie AN, Walker W, Carter KC. An essential role for IL-13 in maintaining a non-healing response following Leishmania mexicana infection. Eur. J. Immunol. 2002;32:2923–2933. doi: 10.1002/1521-4141(2002010)32:10<2923::AID-IMMU2923>3.0.CO;2-E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Arendse B, Van Snick J, Brombacher F. IL-9 is a susceptibility factor in Leishmania major infection by promoting detrimental Th2/type 2 responses. J. Immunol. 2005;174:2205–2211. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.4.2205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Thomas T, Thomas TJ. Polyamine metabolism and cancer. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2003;7:113–126. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2003.tb00210.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Guimaraes ET, Santos LA, dos Santos R. Ribeiro, Teixeira MM, dos Santos WL, Soares MB. Role of interleukin-4 and prostaglandin E2 in Leishmania amazonensis infection of BALB/c mice. Microbes Infect. 2006;8:1219–1226. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2005.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Holscher C, Arendse B, Schwegmann A, Myburgh E, Brombacher F. Impairment of Alternative Macrophage Activation Delays Cutaneous Leishmanisis in Nonhealing BALB/c mice. J Immunol. 2006;176:1115–1121. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.2.1115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kopf M, Brombacher F, Kohler G, Kienzle G, Widmann KH, Lefrang K, Humborg C, Ledermann B, Solbach W. IL-4-deficient Balb/c mice resist infection with Leishmania major. J. Exp. Med. 1996;184:1127–1136. doi: 10.1084/jem.184.3.1127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mohrs M, Holscher C, Brombacher F. Interleukin-4 receptor alpha-deficient BALB/c mice show an unimpaired T helper 2 polarization in response to Leishmania major infection. Infect. Immun. 2000;68:1773–1780. doi: 10.1128/iai.68.4.1773-1780.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mohrs M, Ledermann B, Kohler G, Dorfmuller A, Gessner A, Brombacher F. Differences between IL-4- and IL-4 receptor alpha-deficient mice in chronic leishmaniasis reveal a protective role for IL-13 receptor signaling. J. Immunol. 1999;162:7302–7308. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Reguera RM, Balana-Fouce R, Showalter M, Hickerson S, Beverley SM. Leishmania major lacking arginase (ARG) are auxotrophic for polyamines but retain infectivity to susceptible BALB/c mice. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2009;165:48–56. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2009.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gaur U, Roberts SC, Dalvi RP, Corraliza I, Ullman B, Wilson ME. An effect of parasite-encoded arginase on the outcome of murine cutaneous leishmaniasis. J. Immunol. 2007;179:8446–8453. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.12.8446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Colmenares M, Kar S, Goldsmith-Pestana K, McMahon-Pratt D. Mechanisms of pathogenesis: differences amongst Leishmania species. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2002;96(Supplement 1):S3–7. doi: 10.1016/s0035-9203(02)90044-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.McMahon-Pratt D, Alexander J. Does the Leishmania major paradigm of pathogenesis and protection hold for New World cutaneous leishmaniases or the visceral disease? Immunol. Rev. 2004;201:206–224. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.00190.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Turco SJ, Spath GF, Beverley SM. Is lipophosphoglycan a virulence factor? A surprising diversity between Leishmania species. Trends Parasitol. 2001;17:223–226. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4922(01)01895-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Spath GF, Lye L, Segawa H, Sacks DL, Turco SJ, Beverley SM. Persistence without pathology in phosphoglycan-deficient Leishmania major. Science. 2003;301:1241–1243. doi: 10.1126/science.1087499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Buffet PA, Sulahian A, Garin YJ, Nassar N, Derouin F. Culture microtitration: a sensitive method for quantifying Leishmania infantum in tissues of infected mice. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1995;39:2167–2168. doi: 10.1128/aac.39.9.2167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Titus RG, Marchand M, Boon T, Louis JA. A limiting dilution assay for quantifying Leishmania major in tissues of infected mice. Parasite Immunol. 1985;7:545–555. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.1985.tb00098.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zaph C, Uzonna J, Beverley SM, Scott P. Central memory T cells mediate long-term immunity to Leishmania major in the absence of persistent parasites. Nat. Med. 2004;10:1104–1110. doi: 10.1038/nm1108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ding AH, Nathan CF, Stuehr DJ. Release of reactive nitrogen intermediates and reactive oxygen intermediates from mouse peritoneal macrophages. Comparison of activating cytokines and evidence for independent production. J. Immunol. 1988;141:2407–2412. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Artis D, Speirs K, Joyce K, Goldschmidt M, Caamano J, Hunter CA, Scott P. NF-kappa B1 is required for optimal CD4+ Th1 cell development and resistance to Leishmania major. J. Immunol. 2003;170:1995–2003. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.4.1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Corraliza IM, Campo ML, Soler G, Modolell M. Determination of arginase activity in macrophages: a micromethod. J. Immunol. Methods. 1994;174:231–235. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(94)90027-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Baetselier PD, Namangala B, Noel W, Brys L, Pays E, Beschin A. Alternative versus classical macrophage activation during experimental African trypanosomosis. Int. J. Parasitol. 2001;31:575–587. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7519(01)00170-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Modolell M, Corraliza IM, Link F, Soler G, Eichmann K. Reciprocal regulation of the nitric oxide synthase/arginase balance in mouse bone marrow-derived macrophages by TH1 and TH2 cytokines. Eur. J. Immunol. 1995;25:1101–1104. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830250436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Titus RG, Gueiros-Filho FJ, de Freitas LA, Beverley SM. Development of a safe live Leishmania vaccine line by gene replacement. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1995;92:10267–10271. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.22.10267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Uzonna JE, Spath GF, Beverley SM, Scott P. Vaccination with phosphoglycan-deficient Leishmania major protects highly susceptible mice from virulent challenge without inducing a strong Th1 response. J. Immunol. 2004;172:3793–3797. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.6.3793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Peranzoni E, Marigo I, Dolcetti L, Ugel S, Sonda N, Taschin E, Mantelli B, Bronte V, Zanovello P. Role of arginine metabolism in immunity and immunopathology. Immunobiology. 2007;212:795–812. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2007.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Samuelsson B, Morgenstern R, Jakobsson PJ. Membrane Prostaglandin E Synthase-1: A Novel Therapeutic Target. Pharmacol. Rev. 2007;59:207–224. doi: 10.1124/pr.59.3.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kojima F, Naraba H, Sasaki Y, Beppu M, Aoki H, Kawai S. Prostaglandin E2 is an enhancer of interleukin-1-induced expression of membrane-associated prostaglandin E synthase in rheumatoid synovial fibroblasts. Arthritis. Rheum. 2003;48:2819–2828. doi: 10.1002/art.11261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Capul AA, Hickerson S, Barron T, Turco SJ, Beverley SM. Comparisons of mutants lacking the Golgi UDP-galactose or GDP-mannose transporters establish that phosphoglycans are important for promastigote but not amastigote virulence in Leishmania major. Infect. Immun. 2007;75:4629–4637. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00735-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wanasen N, Soong L. L-arginine metabolism and its impact on host immunity against Leishmania major. Immunol Res. 2008;41:15–25. doi: 10.1007/s12026-007-8012-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Nylen S, Maasho K, Soderstrom K, Ilg T, Akuffo H. Leishmania promastigotes can directly activate primary human natural killer cells to produce interferon-gamma. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2003;131:457–467. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2003.02096.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Giordanengo L, Guinazu N, Stempin C, Fretes R, Cerban F, Gea S. Cruzipain, a major Trypanosoma cruzi antigen, conditions the host immune response in favor of parasite. Eur. J. Immunol. 2002;32:1003–1011. doi: 10.1002/1521-4141(200204)32:4<1003::AID-IMMU1003>3.0.CO;2-P. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Stempin C, Giordanengo L, Gea S, Cerban F. Alternative activation and increase of Trypanosoma cruzi survival in murine macrophages stimulated by cruzipain, a parasite antigen. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2002;72:727–734. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Donnelly S, O’Neill SM, Sekiya M, Mulcahy G, Dalton JP. Thioredoxin peroxidase secreted by Fasciola hepatica induces the alternative activation of macrophages. Infect. Immun. 2005;73:166–173. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.1.166-173.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





