E. Laine, A. Blondel, and T. Malliavin. 2009. Dynamics and energetics: a consensus analysis of the impact of calcium on EF-CaM protein complex. Biophys. J. 96:1249-1263.
Columns do not line up properly in Table 1. Here is the correct table:
Table 1.
Hierarchical clustering analysis: mean correlation values are given for clusters identified from the generalized correlation matrices of EF–(0Ca-CaM), EF–(2Ca-CaM), and EF–(4Ca-CaM) with different cut heights h
| EF–(0Ca-CaM) | EF–(2Ca-CaM) | EF–(4Ca-CaM) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5. 17 ≤ h < 7.1 | 0.44 ± 0.100.60 ± 0.08 | 0.45 ± 0.100.60 ± 0.07 | 0.46 ± 0.100.60 ± 0.08 |
| 5 ≤ h < < 5.17 | 0.44 ± 0.100.60 ± 0.08 | 0.45 ± 0.100.60 ± 0.07 | 0.46 ± 0.100.56 ± 0.080.71 ± 0.07 |
| 4.4 ≤ h < 5 | 0.46 ± 0.100.46 ± 0.160.60 ± 0.08 | 0.46 ± 0.100.47 ± 0.220.60 ± 0.07 | 0.46 ± 0.100.56 ± 0.080.71 ± 0.07 |
For hopt = 5 two, two, and three clusters are identified for EF–(0Ca-CaM), EF–(2Ca-CaM) and EF–(4Ca-CaM), respectively, which display significantly different mean correlation values.