Skip to main content
The Journal of Biological Chemistry logoLink to The Journal of Biological Chemistry
. 2009 Nov 6;285(2):1128–1137. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.037705

18β-Glycyrrhetinic Acid Ameliorates Acute Propionibacterium acnes-induced Liver Injury through Inhibition of Macrophage Inflammatory Protein-1α*

Yichuan Xiao , Jingwei Xu , Chaoming Mao , Min Jin , Qiong Wu , Jie Zou , Qiaoli Gu , Yi Zhang §, Yanyun Zhang ‡,1
PMCID: PMC2801241  PMID: 19897483

Abstract

18β-Glycyrrhetinic acid (GA), the major bioactive component of licorice root extract, has a protective effect on hepatic injury and exhibits antiinflammatory activity. Here, we investigate the effect of GA in Propionibacterium acnes-induced acute inflammatory liver injury. C57BL/6 mice were primed with P. acnes followed by lipopolysaccharide challenge to induce fulminant hepatitis. GA (75 mg/kg) or vehicle control was administered intraperitoneally daily 1 day after P. acnes priming, and GA significantly improved mouse mortality. Then, to investigate the underlying mechanisms of GA in this acute inflammatory liver injury model, we primed C57BL/6 mice with P. acnes only. We propose that GA ameliorates acute P. acnes-induced liver injury through reduced macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1α expression in Kupffer cells by down-regulating MyD88 expression and inhibiting NF-κB activation. Reduced MIP-1α expression lowered the recruitment of CD11c+B220 dendritic cell precursors into the liver. Consequently, GA treatment inhibits the activation and proliferation of liver-infiltrating CD4+ T cells and reduces the production of serum alanine aminotransferase and proinflammatory cytokines such as interferon-γ and tumor necrosis factor-α. Moreover, anti-MIP-1α treatment in P. acnes-primed mice inhibits the recruitment of dendritic cell precursors into the liver and suppresses mouse mortality as GA does. Taken together, our results suggest that GA exhibits antiinflammatory effects through inhibition of MIP-1α in a mouse model of acute P. acnes-induced inflammatory liver injury.

Introduction

Fulminant hepatitis, developing secondary to infection, toxin, or immune-mediated attack, is a rare but potentially fatal disease associated with failure of hepatic regeneration. Mortality without supportive management and/or liver transplantation can be high, and the processes leading to such profound hepatic damage are unknown (1).

The molecular pathogenesis of massive hepatic necrosis is currently under extensive investigation using several animal models (24). Mice injected with heat-killed Propionibacterium acnes followed by lipopolysaccharide (LPS)2 is one of the most commonly used animal models of fulminant hepatitis (57), which can be pathophysiologically classified into two phases: the priming phase induced by P. acnes from day 0 to day 7, and the eliciting phase induced by LPS injection on day 7. At the priming phase, liver macrophages, known as Kupffer cells, continually screen and capture P. acnes from blood and are activated upon P. acnes stimulation (5, 6). Kupffer cells then secrete chemokines such as macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1α to recruit a subset of CD11c+B220 dendritic cell (DC) precursors in the liver, which is an initial event and a prerequisite for liver injury in this model (5, 6). DC precursors differentiate into mature DCs and migrate into hepatic lymph nodes to activate P. acnes-specific CD4+ T cells, which are then recruited to the liver. The accumulation of T cells, macrophages, and DCs produces various proinflammatory molecules and forms granulomas (8). At the eliciting phase, LPS injection enlarges liver inflammation and enhances granuloma formation, leading to massive hepatocellular damage due to necrosis and apoptosis around the granulomas. Within a few days, the dramatically altered internal environment finally results in acute liver failure (58).

Traditional Chinese herbal medicine has a history spanning >1000 years (9). As a traditional Chinese medicine, licorice (Glycyrrhizza glabra L.) has been used in the treatment of various inflammatory diseases since ancient times (10), although its therapeutic mechanism remains unknown. Glycyrrhizin, a major bioactive triterpene glycoside of licorice root extract, exhibits its pharmacological functions through its biologically active metabolite, 18β-glycyrrhetinic acid (GA) (11). GA is known to exhibit a variety of pharmacological effects, with the most dramatic being its antiinflammatory effect (1215). Recently, Yang et al. (15) found that the stronger neo-minophagen C, a glycyrrhizin preparation, could effectively protect liver against LPS/d-GalN-induced fulminant hepatitis by inhibiting the production of proinflammatory molecules. However, the molecular mechanisms of GA in suppressing acute inflammatory liver injury still need to be elucidated further.

In this study, we found that GA can significantly improve mouse mortality in the model of fulminant hepatitis. In addition, we propose that within 7 days after P. acnes priming, GA ameliorates the clinical symptoms and disease progression of liver injury through inhibition of MIP-1α.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Animals and Experimental Protocol

Female C57BL/6 mice (8–10 weeks old) were purchased from Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) and were kept under pathogen-free conditions in the animal center of the Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (Shanghai, China). To induce severe liver injury, mice were injected with 1 mg of heat-killed P. acnes via the tail vein. For survival analysis, mice were given an intravenous injection of 1 μg of LPS 7 days after P. acnes priming. At the indicated time intervals, at least five mice were killed at each time point. Approximately 0.8–1 ml of blood was obtained by cardiac puncture under ether anesthesia, and liver specimens were sampled. Hepatocellular damage was determined by serum alanine aminotransferase levels. For the treatment experiments, GA (75 mg/kg) (GA mice) or dimethyl sulfoxide (Sigma-Aldrich) as vehicle control (control mice) was administered intraperitoneally daily 1 day after P. acnes priming. In some experiments, 200 μg/100 μl anti-MIP-1α polyclonal antibody or control rabbit IgG in phosphate-buffered saline was administered 0 and 2 days after P. acnes injection. For in vivo proliferation assays, mice were injected intraperitoneally with BrdUrd (Sigma-Aldrich) 1 day before sacrifice. All animal experiments complied with the animal protocols approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Institute of Health Sciences (Shanghai, China).

Histology and Immunohistochemistry

Liver specimens were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin and paraffin-embedded. Deparaffinized sections (5–10 μm) were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and analyzed by light microscopy. For immunostaining, frozen sections (8 μm) from liver specimens were incubated with rat anti-mouse CD4 or CD11c antibody (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) and were then labeled with Cy3-conjugated rabbit anti-rat IgG (Jackson Laboratories) and examined by immunofluorescence microscopy (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).

Preparation of Mononuclear Cells (MNCs) from Liver and Flow Cytometric Analysis

Liver samples from mice were minced and pressed through a 70-μm nylon mesh (BD Falcon, Franklin Lakes, NJ). The cell suspension was treated with 33% Percoll and centrifuged at 2000 rpm at 20 °C for 20 min with break off to remove liver parenchymal cells. The pellets were treated with an red blood cell lysis solution and then washed and resuspended.

Suspensions of cells were stained with fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled anti-CD4, anti-CD80, anti-CD86, phycoerythrin-conjugated anti-major histocompatibility complex II, anti-B220, anti-CD62L, anti-CD11b, allophycocyanin-conjugated anti-CD44, or biotin-conjugated anti-CD11c and anti-CD69. For biotin-conjugated antibodies, incubation with allophycocyanin-conjugated streptavidin (all from BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA) was then performed. Isotype controls were used for determination of negative cells. The stained cells were analyzed on a FACSAria instrument (BD Biosciences). In some experiments, the absolute number of DC precursors was determined by multiplying the total MNC number by the fraction of CD11c+B220 populations through flow cytometry. Serum interferon (IFN)-γ, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-4, and IL-5 were measured using a cytometric bead array (BD Pharmingen) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Proliferation Assay

MNCs from hepatic lymph nodes were prepared by gentle mechanical disruption followed by filtration and density gradient centrifugation using Ficoll as described previously (7). Suspensions of MNCs (105 cells/well) of hepatic lymph nodes were cultured in triplicate in 96-well flat-bottomed plates with or without 10 μg/ml heat-killed P. acnes in complete Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium at 37 °C under an atmosphere of 5% CO2/95% air for 72 h. For the inhibition assay, either GA at the indicated concentrations or vehicle was added to the culture. Cell proliferation was measured using CCK8 reagent (Dojindo, Kumamoto, Japan).

Kupffer Cell Isolation

Liver Kupffer cells were prepared as described previously with some modifications (16). In brief, livers were dissected, homogenized in ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline, and centrifuged. The pellet was resuspended and overlaid on 4 ml of 70% Percoll and 4 ml of 30% Percoll. The Percoll gradient was centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 20 min at 20 °C, without braking, and cells were collected from the 30%/70% Percoll interface, washed with phosphate-buffered saline, and resuspended.

Real Time PCR

Total RNA was isolated using TRIzol (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions and reverse transcribed. mRNA expression of IL-2, MIP-1α, MyD88, and β-actin was determined by real time PCR using SYBR Green Master Mix (ABI, Foster City, CA). The primers for IL-2 were 5′-CCTGAGCAGGATGGAGAATTACA-3′ and 5′-TCCAGAACATGCCGCAGAG-3′. The primers for MIP-1α were 5′-ACCATGACACTCTGCAACCA-3′ and 5′-GTGGAATCTTCCGGCTGTAG-3′. The primers for MyD88 were 5′-CAGGAGATGATCCGGCAACT-3′ and 5′-CTGGCAATGGACCAGACACA-3′. The primers for β-actin were 5′-ATGGAGGGGAATACAGCCC-3′ and 5′-TTCTTTGCAGCTCCTTCGTT-3′. Data were collected and quantitatively analyzed on an ABI Prism 7900 sequence detection system. Mouse β-actin gene was used as an endogenous control for sample normalization.

Western Blot Analysis and Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay

For Western blot analysis, protein extracts were resolved on 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. The protein of interest was detected by immunostaining with specific primary antibodies followed by horseradish peroxidase-labeled secondary antibodies using chemiluminescence labeling.

The detection of NF-κB activation was performed with a commercial LightShift Chemiluminescent electrophoretic mobility shift assay kit (Viagene), according to the manufacturer's instruction. The consensus NF-κB oligonucleotides included in the kit was 5′-AGTTGAGGGGACTTTCCCAGGC-3′.

Statistical Analysis

The significance between two groups was examined using Student's t test after analyzing the variance. A p value of <0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Suppression of Mortality and Severity of Liver Injury by GA

The chemical form of GA is shown in Fig. 1 (11). The compound had a low LD50 of 308 mg/kg when administered by intraperitoneal injection in mice (17). To determine whether GA alleviates fulminant hepatitis, GA (75 mg/kg) (GA mice) or vehicle control (control mice) was administered intraperitoneally daily 1 day after P. acnes priming, then on day 7, LPS was injected to induce fulminant hepatitis, and the effect of GA on the survival rate of mice was investigated. As illustrated in Fig. 2A, 60% of control mice died within 12 h, and all control mice died within 18 h in response to subsequent LPS injection. In contrast, all GA mice survived for 24 h, and no GA mouse died in the subsequent time observed (data not shown), suggesting that GA treatment could dramatically promote the survival rate of P. acnes/LPS-induced fulminant hepatitis in mice. To investigate the mechanism of GA on decreased mouse mortality, we analyzed serum alanine aminotransferase levels within 7 days upon P. acnes priming. In control mice, serum alanine aminotransferase levels were elevated markedly compared with unprimed normal mice. In contrast, GA mice experienced only a slight increase in serum alanine aminotransferase level (Fig. 2B). To elucidate the basis for the reduced elevation in serum alanine aminotransferase levels in GA mice, liver tissues were examined histopathologically on day 7 after P. acnes priming. In control mice, large number of macrophages and lymphocytes infiltrated in the liver, with focal hepatocellular edema and necrosis seen everywhere in hepatic lobules. Moreover, granulomas of different sizes were discovered in the liver. In GA mice, cellular infiltration in the liver decreased markedly and the hepatocellular inflammation recovered, and there was no granuloma formed in the liver sections we observed (Fig. 2C). Besides, we found that P. acnes can induce hepatocytic apoptotic body formation (Fig. 2D, black arrows) mostly in portal areas begin at day 5, whereas there was no hepatocyte apoptosis observed in GA mice during the 7 days after P. acnes priming. Additionally, GA treatment promoted hepatocyte mitosis (Fig. 2D, white arrows) upon P. acnes stimulation. These results suggest that GA treatment successfully inhibited P. acnes-induced liver inflammation and finally suppressed fulminant hepatitis-induced death in mice.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1.

Chemical structure of GA.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2.

GA treatment suppressed mouse mortality and severity of P. acnes-induced acute liver injury. Mice were injected with P. acnes. GA or vehicle control was administered intraperitoneally daily 1 day after P. acnes injection. A, cumulative survival rates of control and GA mice after LPS injection. B, serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels of normal, control, or GA mice on day 7 after P. acnes priming. The data represent the means ± S.D. (error bar) from three to five mice. *, p < 0.05. C, histopathological analysis of liver specimens obtained from normal, control, or GA mice on day 7 after P. acnes priming (magnification, ×200). D, histopathological analysis of liver specimens obtained from control or GA mice on days 3, 5, and 7 after P. acnes priming (magnification, ×400).

Effects of GA on CD4+ T Cell Infiltration and Cytokine Production

It was reported that P. acnes-induced liver injury is a Th1-mediated response and that infiltration of CD4+ T cells in liver is the main cause of liver injury (57). We therefore investigated the status of CD4+ T cell infiltration in P. acnes-primed liver after GA treatment. As shown in Fig. 3, A and B, numerous CD4+ T cells infiltrated the liver of control mice 7 days after P. acnes injection compared with normal mouse liver. GA treatment significantly inhibited CD4+ T cell infiltration, which was comparable with the level of normal mice (Fig. 3C). In addition, flow cytometric analysis also indicated the markedly decreased number of liver-infiltrating CD4+ T cells in GA mice (Fig. 3D).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3.

GA treatment inhibited liver CD4+ T cell infiltration and reduced the production of serum proinflammatory cytokines. Mice were injected with P. acnes. GA or vehicle control was administered daily 1 day after P. acnes injection. A–C, immunofluorescence staining of CD4+ T cells in liver specimens obtained from normal, control, or GA mice on day 7 after P. acnes priming (magnification, ×200). D, numbers of liver-infiltrating CD4+ T cells from normal, control, or GA mice analyzed by flow cytometry. E, concentrations of IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-4, and IL-5 in serum from normal, control, or GA mice measured using a cytometric bead array kit. The data represent the means ± S.D. (error bars) from three to five mice. *, p < 0.05.

We also examined serum inflammatory cytokine levels 7 days after P. acnes priming; the concentrations of Th1 cytokines (IFN-γ and TNF-α) were elevated notably, whereas Th2 cytokines (IL-4 and IL-5) showed no significant change. In contrast, GA treatment decreased serum IFN-γ and TNF-α production significantly but showed almost no influence on IL-4 and IL-5 production (Fig. 3E). These results indicate that GA suppresses P. acnes-induced liver injury by inhibiting the infiltration of CD4+ T cells in the liver and Th1 cytokine production.

GA Treatment Inhibits Liver-infiltrating CD4+ T Cell Activation and Proliferation

To analyze the mechanism of limited CD4+ T cell infiltration in the liver after GA treatment, we examined the effect of GA on CD4+ T cell activation and proliferation in vivo and in vitro. As shown in Fig. 4A, the percentage of CD44+CD4+ T cells in the liver of P. acnes-primed mice significantly decreased after GA treatment, whereas there was almost no effect on expression of the other two activation markers, CD62L and CD69. GA treatment also significantly inhibited the proliferation of liver-infiltrating CD4+ T cells (Fig. 4B) as well as their IL-2 mRNA expression (Fig. 4C) as indicated by BrdUrd incorporation and real time PCR assay.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4.

Effect of GA on CD4+ T cell activation and proliferation. Mice were injected with P. acnes. GA or vehicle control was administered daily 1 day after P. acnes injection. A, CD44, CD62L, and CD69 expression on liver-infiltrating CD4+ T cells from control or GA mice were analyzed by flow cytometry. B, mice were injected intraperitoneally with BrdUrd 1 day before sacrifice. BrdUrd+CD4+ T cells in the liver from control or GA mice were analyzed by flow cytometry. C, liver-infiltrating CD4+ T cells from control or GA mice on day 7 after P. acnes priming were separated using magnetic cell sorting microbeads, and their IL-2 mRNA expressions were analyzed by real time PCR. D and E, suspensions of MNCs (105 cells/well) of hepatic lymph nodes from control or GA mice on day 7 after P. acnes priming were cultured in triplicate with (10 μg/ml) or without heat-killed P. acnes, GA was added at the concentration indicated, and cell proliferation was measured using CCK8 reagents. The data represent the means ± S.D. (error bars) from three to five mice. *, p < 0.05.

GA Reduces the Recruitment of CD11c+B220 DC Precursors through Inhibition of MIP-1α

We next examined the changes in P. acnes-specific proliferation of MNCs evoked by GA treatment in vitro. Unexpectedly, upon P. acnes stimulation, there was no significant difference in proliferation ability between MNCs from control and GA-treated mice (Fig. 4D). Meanwhile, GA did not exhibit any inhibitory effect on the proliferation of MNCs from control mice upon P. acnes stimulation in vitro (Fig. 4E). These results indicate that the inhibition of CD4+ T cell activation and proliferation in P. acnes-primed mice after GA treatment is independent of a direct effect on CD4+ T cells.

We have reported previously that P. acnes-induced recruitment of CD11c+B220 DC precursors from blood is an initial event and is a prerequisite for liver injury in this P. acnes-induced liver injury model (6). Here, we investigate whether GA influences the recruitment of CD11c+B220 DC precursors from blood. As we found previously, CD11c+B200 DC precursors increase markedly and peak at day 7 after P. acnes priming (Fig. 5, A, B, and D). In contrast, GA treatment dramatically inhibits the recruitment of DC precursors from peripheral blood, and there was no significant increase in the number during the 7 days after P. acnes priming (Fig. 5, C and D), suggesting that impaired activation and proliferation of liver-infiltrating CD4+ T cells in GA mice result from the reduced recruitment of CD11c+B200 DC precursors. We then analyzed the expression status of chemokine MIP-1α, which is known to influence the recruitment of CD11c+B200 DC precursors. As expected, liver MIP-1α mRNA expression was significantly inhibited, and the inhibitory effect was in parallel with the tendency toward decreased recruitment of DC precursors during the 7 days after P. acnes priming (Fig. 5, D and E).

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5.

GA treatment reduced the recruitment of CD11c+B220 DC precursors and MIP-1α mRNA expression. Mice were injected with P. acnes. GA or vehicle control was administered daily 1 day after P. acnes injection. A–C, immunofluorescence staining of CD11c+ cells in liver specimens obtained from normal, control, or GA mice on day 7 after P. acnes priming (magnification, ×200) is shown. D and E, liver samples from control or GA mice were collected 1, 3, 5, and 7 days after P. acnes priming, and the numbers of CD11c+B220 DC precursors in the liver from each group were analyzed by multiplying the total MNCs number by the fraction of CD11c+B220 populations through flow cytometry. The arrow indicates the time point at which GA or vehicle control was administered. MIP-1α mRNA expression in the liver was analyzed by real time PCR. The data represent the means ± S.D. (error bars) from three to five mice. *, p < 0.05. F and G, mice were treated as described under “Experimental Procedures,” and the numbers of CD11c+B220 DC precursors in the liver from normal, vehicle control-, GA-, control antibody-, or anti-MIP-1α-treated mice 7 days after P. acnes priming were analyzed by flow cytometry. The data represent the means ± S.D. from three to five mice. *, p < 0.05. Cumulative survival rates of vehicle control-, GA-, control antibody-, and anti-MIP-1α-treated mice were analyzed after LPS injection.

We further examined whether the inhibited recruitment of CD11c+B200 DC precursors into GA-treated mouse liver is due to decreased production of MIP-1α. As shown in Fig. 5F, anti-MIP-1α treatment significantly inhibited the recruitment of DC precursors in P. acnes-primed mouse livers compared with that in control antibody-treated mouse livers, which has a trend similar to GA mice. Moreover, anti-MIP-1α treatment also suppressed the mouse mortality as GA did, whereas all control antibody-treated mice died within 12 h after LPS injection (Fig. 5G). These results indicate that the reduced recruitment of CD11c+B200 DC precursors in GA-treated mouse liver is mediated by inhibition of MIP-1α in the liver.

Inhibition of MyD88 Expression and NF-κB Activation after GA Treatment

Phagocytic liver macrophages, Kupffer cells, play critical roles in initiation of hepatitis (18). We reported previously that in this P. acnes-induced liver injury model, Kupffer cells continually screen and capture P. acnes from blood and that Kupffer cells may be the source of MIP-1α to recruit DC precursors (6). As a result, we investigated the effects of GA on Kupffer cell activation and MIP-1α expression. As illustrated in Fig. 6A, GA significantly reduced the expression of major histocompatibility complex II and co-stimulatory molecules (CD80 and CD86) in Kupffer cells. Additionally, mRNA expression of MIP-1α was also inhibited significantly (Fig. 6B).

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6.

GA inhibited Kupffer cell activation and MIP-1α expression by suppressing MyD88 expression and NF-κB activation. Mice were injected with P. acnes. GA or vehicle CD80, CD86, control was administered daily 1 day after P. acnes injection. Liver Kupffer cells were isolated from control or GA mice on day 7 after P. acnes priming. A, CD80, CD86, and major histocompatibility complex II (MHCII) expression on CD11b+ Kupffer cells was analyzed by flow cytometry. B and C, MIP-1α and MyD88 mRNA expression was measured using real time PCR. The data represent the means ± S.D. (error bars) from three to five mice. *, p < 0.05. D and E, Western blot analysis of IκBα expression and electrophoretic mobility shift assay of NF-κB activities from normal, control, or GA mice.

MyD88 has been reported to play important roles in P. acnes-induced liver injury, and MyD88-deficient mice showed impaired liver inflammation and granuloma formation after P. acnes induction (19, 20). We examined the mRNA expression of MyD88 in Kupffer cells on day 7 after P. acnes priming and found that GA significantly reduced MyD88 mRNA expression in Kupffer cells (Fig. 6C). In addition, GA significantly inhibited the activation of NF-κB, a downstream signal of MyD88, as indicated by inhibition of IκBα degradation and NF-κB activity (Fig. 6, D and E).

DISCUSSION

P. acnes-induced liver injury is reported to be a Th1 cell-mediated inflammatory response (57). During this process, numerous MNCs accumulate in the liver and secrete proinflammatory cytokines, which promote the activation and proliferation of CD4+ T cells and liver inflammation. When followed by LPS injection on day 7, massive liver damage ensues and will cause mouse death in a short time (47). In this study, we found that GA treatment suppresses P. acnes/LPS-induced mouse mortality and ameliorated acute liver damage. In addition, we discovered that GA treatment significantly inhibits CD4+ T cell infiltration in the liver after P. acnes priming. Moreover, the activation status and proliferation ability of liver-infiltrating CD4+ T cells were also impaired as indicated by the down-regulation of an activation marker CD44 expression and BrdUrd incorporation.

However, there were no significant differences found in the P. acnes-specific proliferation rate of MNCs between GA mice and control mice in ex vivo studies. Furthermore, GA failed to inhibit directly the proliferation of MNCs from control mice upon P. acnes restimulation in vitro. These results suggest that the amelioration of liver injury by GA treatment is not the result of direct action on the proliferation and activation of liver-infiltrating CD4+ T cells and that GA functions in an upstream event in this P. acnes-induced liver injury model.

The inflammatory microenvironment provides optimal conditions for emigration of lymphocytes from blood (21, 22). Accumulating evidence indicates that inflammatory or microbial stimuli could induce the production of various chemokines, which play essential roles in regulating the extravasation and tissue accumulation of lymphocytes during disease progression (21, 2326). In this model of P. acnes-induced liver injury, we demonstrated previously that chemokine MIP-1α plays an important role in the recruitment of CD11c+B200 DC precursors, which then induce a Th1 response and inflammation in the liver (6, 8). Our results showed that GA treatment inhibits the recruitment of CD11c+B200 DC precursors, which provides a reason for the impaired activation and proliferation of liver-infiltrating CD4+ T cells in GA mice. In addition, the inhibitory tendency toward recruitment of DC precursors is in parallel with the reduced MIP-1α expression in the liver after GA treatment, implying that the impaired recruitment of DC precursors is due to inhibition of MIP-1α secretion in the liver. Moreover, anti-MIP-1α treatment also inhibits the recruitment of CD11c+B200 DC precursors and suppresses mouse mortality as GA did. These results collectively suggest that GA-mediated amelioration of mouse liver inflammation is caused by inhibition of MIP-1α.

Liver resident macrophages, Kupffer cells, play important roles in initiation of many forms of hepatitis (18). We previously reported that in (the) mouse model of P. acnes-induced liver injury, Kupffer cells could capture heat-killed P. acnes from blood and secrete MIP-1α, which is responsible for the recruitment of circulating DC precursors (6, 27). In this study, we found that the activation status and MIP-1α mRNA expression of Kupffer cells from GA mice were significantly inhibited compared with those of control mice, suggesting that GA exhibits the ability to inhibit Kupffer cell activation after P. acnes priming and, as a result, induces a series of subsequent events that ameliorate liver injury.

GA, the major active component of the medicinal plant licorice, has been reported to exhibit a variety of pharmacological effects, including antitumor, antihepatotoxic, and immunomodulatory activities (14, 2830). However, little is known about the mechanisms by which GA accomplishes the above-mentioned pharmacological activities, especially its immunomodulatory effect. MyD88, the common adaptor of Toll-like receptors, has been demonstrated to play a critical role in the induction of liver injury and the formation of granulomas after P. acnes priming. In this mouse model of P. acnes-induced inflammatory liver injury, MyD88 expression up-regulated markedly (19, 20). Besides, we found that GA can inhibit P. acnes-induced up-regulation of MyD88 expression. As a result, GA treatment inhibited liver granuloma formation and production of inflammatory cytokines, such as IFN-γ and TNF-α, which was in accordance with the results observed previously in MyD88-deficient mice (19, 20, 31). In addition, it was reported that GA could inhibit TNF-α-induced chemokine expression through inhibition of NF-κB activation in vitro (32). In this study, we found that GA could also effectively inhibit P. acnes-induced NF-κB activation and chemokine MIP-1α expression in vivo, which might be mediated by the down-regulation of MyD88 expression.

The MyD88 protein is an adaptor molecule that participates in P. acnes-induced acute inflammatory liver injury (19, 20). It contains two protein-protein interaction domains, an N-terminal death domain and a C-terminal Toll/IL-1R homology domain separated by a short linker region. MyD88 is recruited to the receptor complexes as a dimer, which is stabilized by homophilic interactions occurring between the death domain and Toll/IL-1R homology domains. Once recruited, it leads to the activation of a serial of kinases, and finally targets to degradation the IκB, thereby allowing the NF-κB enter the nucleus and activate transcription (33). We found in this study that GA could significantly alleviate P. acnes-induced liver injury through inhibition of MyD88 expression and NF-κB activation, which suggests that MyD88 might be a potential target of GA for its antiinflammatory activity. Recent evidence revealed that a novel synthesized compound inhibited MyD88 dimerization and IL-1β-mediated activation of NF-κB transcriptional activity, suggestive of potential antiinflammatory activity (34, 35). Therefore, GA might interact with the MyD88 protein domain and disrupt its dimerization, which led to decreased activation of NF-κB and reduced inflammatory transcription, and finally alleviated acute liver injury.

In conclusion, we find that GA exhibits antiinflammatory effects through reduced MIP-1α expression that mediated by inhibiting MyD88 expression and NF-κB activation in immunopathogenesis in a mouse model of P. acnes-induced acute inflammatory liver injury. This study provides new insights into the mechanisms of antiinflammatory effects of GA and a novel potential therapeutic drug from natural compounds for the treatment of acute inflammatory liver damage and other inflammatory diseases.

Acknowledgment

We thank Dr. Sheri M. Skinner (University of Texas Medical School, Houston, TX) for a critical review of the manuscript.

*

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China 2010CB945600 and 2009ZX09503-24, Knowledge Innovation Project of The Chinese Academy of Sciences KSCX1-YW-22, National Natural Science Foundation of China 30670911 and 30901317, Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality Programs 074319102 and 07JC14070, and Leading Academic Discipline Project of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission J50207.

2
The abbreviations used are:
LPS
lipopolysaccharide
MIP-1α
macrophage inflammatory protein-1α
DC
dendritic cell
GA
18β-glycyrrhetinic acid
MNC
mononuclear cell
IFN-γ
interferon-γ
TNF-α
tumor necrosis factor-α
IL
interleukin.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Hoofnagle J. H., Carithers R. L., Jr., Shapiro C., Ascher N. (1995) Hepatology 21, 240–252 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lu J. W., Wang H., Yan-Li J., Zhang C., Ning H., Li X. Y., Zhang H., Duan Z. H., Zhao L., Wei W., Xu D. X. (2008) J. Hepatol. 48, 442–452 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Soriano M. E., Nicolosi L., Bernardi P. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 36803–36808 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Romics L., Jr., Dolganiuc A., Kodys K., Drechsler Y., Oak S., Velayudham A., Mandrekar P., Szabo G. (2004) Hepatology 40, 555–564 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yoneyama H., Narumi S., Zhang Y., Murai M., Baggiolini M., Lanzavecchia A., Ichida T., Asakura H., Matsushima K. (2002) J. Exp. Med. 195, 1257–1266 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yoneyama H., Matsuno K., Zhang Y., Murai M., Itakura M., Ishikawa S., Hasegawa G., Naito M., Asakura H., Matsushima K. (2001) J. Exp. Med. 193, 35–49 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nakayama Y., Shimizu Y., Hirano K., Ebata K., Minemura M., Watanabe A., Sugiyama T. (2005) Hepatology 42, 915–924 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zhang Y., Yoneyama H., Wang Y., Ishikawa S., Hashimoto S., Gao J. L., Murphy P., Matsushima K. (2004) J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 96, 201–209 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Di Carlo G., Borrelli F., Ernst E., Izzo A. A. (2001) Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 22, 292–297 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Eisenbrand G. (2006) Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 50, 1087–1088 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lin G., Nnane I. P., Cheng T. Y. (1999) Toxicon 37, 1259–1270 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Farina C., Pinza M., Pifferi G. (1998) FARMACO 53, 22–32 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jeong H. G., You H. J., Park S. J., Moon A. R., Chung Y. C., Kang S. K., Chun H. K. (2002) Pharmacol. Res. 46, 221–227 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kroes B. H., Beukelman C. J., van den Berg A. J., Wolbink G. J., van Dijk H., Labadie R. P. (1997) Immunology 90, 115–120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yang B. S., Ma Y. J., Wang Y., Chen L. Y., Bi M. R., Yan B. Z., Bai L., Zhou H., Wang F. X. (2007) World J. Gastroenterol. 13, 462–466 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pulford K., Souhami R. L. (1980) Clin. Exp. Immunol. 42, 67–76 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Juszczak G. R., Swiergiel A. H. (2009) Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 33, 181–198 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Matsuno K., Ezaki T. (2000) Int. Rev. Cytol. 197, 83–136 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hritz I., Velayudham A., Dolganiuc A., Kodys K., Mandrekar P., Kurt-Jones E., Szabo G. (2008) Hepatology 48, 1342–1347 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Velayudham A., Hritz I., Dolganiuc A., Mandrekar P., Kurt-Jones E., Szabo G. (2006) J. Hepatol. 45, 813–824 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mempel T. R., Henrickson S. E., Von Andrian U. H. (2004) Nature 427, 154–159 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Resto V. A., Burdick M. M., Dagia N. M., McCammon S. D., Fennewald S. M., Sackstein R. (2008) J. Biol. Chem. 283, 15816–15824 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yamamoto S., Shimizu S., Kiyonaka S., Takahashi N., Wajima T., Hara Y., Negoro T., Hiroi T., Kiuchi Y., Okada T., Kaneko S., Lange I., Fleig A., Penner R., Nishi M., Takeshima H., Mori Y. (2008) Nat. Med. 14, 738–747 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bernhagen J., Krohn R., Lue H., Gregory J. L., Zernecke A., Koenen R. R., Dewor M., Georgiev I., Schober A., Leng L., Kooistra T., Fingerle-Rowson G., Ghezzi P., Kleemann R., McColl S. R., Bucala R., Hickey M. J., Weber C. (2007) Nat. Med. 13, 587–596 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Debes G. F., Arnold C. N., Young A. J., Krautwald S., Lipp M., Hay J. B., Butcher E. C. (2005) Nat. Immunol. 6, 889–894 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Varrin-Doyer M., Vincent P., Cavagna S., Auvergnon N., Noraz N., Rogemond V., Honnorat J., Moradi-Améli M., Giraudon P. (2009) J. Biol. Chem. 284, 13265–13276 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.He S., Cao Q., Yoneyama H., Ge H., Zhang Y., Zhang Y. (2008) J. Leukocyte Biol. 84, 1549–1556 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rossi T., Castelli M., Zandomeneghi G., Ruberto A., Benassi L., Magnoni C., Santachiara S., Baggio G. (2003) Anticancer Res. 23, 3813–3818 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wu X., Zhang L., Gurley E., Studer E., Shang J., Wang T., Wang C., Yan M., Jiang Z., Hylemon P. B., Sanyal A. J., Pandak W. M., Jr., Zhou H. (2008) Hepatology 47, 1905–1915 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ukil A., Biswas A., Das T., Das P. K. (2005) J. Immunol. 175, 1161–1169 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Layland L. E., Wagner H., da Costa C. U. (2005) Eur. J. Immunol. 35, 3248–3257 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kang O. H., Kim J. A., Choi Y. A., Park H. J., Kim D. K., An Y. H., Choi S. C., Yun K. J., Nah Y. H., Cai X. F., Kim Y. H., Bae K. H., Lee Y. M. (2005) Int. J. Mol. Med. 15, 981–985 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Dunne A., Ejdeback M., Ludidi P. L., O'Neill L. A., Gay N. J. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 41443–41451 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Loiarro M., Sette C., Gallo G., Ciacci A., Fantò N., Mastroianni D., Carminati P., Ruggiero V. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280, 15809–15814 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Loiarro M., Capolunghi F., Fantò N., Gallo G., Campo S., Arseni B., Carsetti R., Carminati P., De Santis R., Ruggiero V., Sette C. (2007) J. Leukocyte Biol. 82, 801–810 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

RESOURCES