Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience logoLink to Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
. 2009 Dec 9;3:18. doi: 10.3389/neuro.03.018.2009

A New Photosensory Function for Simple Photoreceptors, the Intrinsically Photoresponsive Neurons of the Sea Slug Onchidium

Tsukasa Gotow 1,*, Takako Nishi 2
PMCID: PMC2802546  PMID: 20057929

Abstract

Simple photoreceptors, namely intrinsically light-sensitive neurons without microvilli and/or cilia, have long been known to exist in the central ganglia of crayfish, Aplysia, Onchidium, and Helix. These simple photoreceptors are not only first-order photosensory cells, but also second-order neurons (interneurons), relaying several kinds of sensory synaptic inputs. Another important issue is that the photoresponses of these simple photoreceptors show very slow kinetics and little adaptation. These characteristics suggest that the simple photoreceptors of the Onchidium have a function in non-image-forming vision, different from classical eye photoreceptors used for cording dynamic images of vision. The cited literature provides evidence that the depolarizing and hyperpolarizing photoresponses of simple photoreceptors play a role in the long-lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission of excitatory and inhibitory sensory inputs, and as well as in the potentiation and the suppression of the subsequent behavioral outputs. In short, we suggest that simple photoreceptors operate in the general potentiation of synaptic transmission and subsequent motor output; i.e., they perform a new photosensory function.

Keywords: molluscan simple photoreceptors, photoresponsive neurons similar to ipRGC, phototransduction, photosensory synaptic potentiation, potentiated sensory inputs

Introduction

It has been known since the 1930s that photoresponsive neurons that are intrinsically sensitive to light exist in the central ganglia of some invertebrates besides the photoreceptor cells (photoreceptors) in classical bilateral eyes. For instance, there are photoresponsive neurons in the sixth abdominal ganglion of the crayfish (Kennedy, 1963) and the visceral (abdominal) or pleuro-parietal ganglia of the sea slugs Aplysia (Arvanitaki and Chalazonitis, 1961; Brown and Brown, 1973) and Onchidium verruculatum (Hisano et al., 1972; Gotow, 1989).

We refer to these neurons as simple photoreceptors, in view of their lack of any specialized structures, such as microvilli and/or cilia, that are characteristic of classical eye photoreceptors (see review, Gotow and Nishi, 2008). In addition, it is known that these simple photoreceptors are not only first-order photosensory cells, but are also second-order neurons (interneurons), relaying several kinds of sensory inputs (Kennedy, 1963; Frazier et al., 1967; Gotow, 1975).

Recently, similar simple photoreceptors, the intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGC), were discovered in mammalian retinas (Berson et al., 2002; Hattar et al., 2002), and their relevance will be discussed later.

A considerable amount of information has been obtained about the phototransduction mechanisms underlying the first-order photosensory responses of invertebrates, especially that of the simple photoreceptors of Onchidium (for review, Gotow and Nishi, 2008). However, little has yet been established about how their simple photoreceptor functions as second-order neurons (interneurons) in vivo.

This review examines the non-image-forming visual functions of simple photoreceptors acting as second-order neurons. In addition, we survey the profiles of the cell membrane channels that mediate related receptor potentials and the phototransduction mechanisms of the simple photoreceptors studied to date.

Characteristics of Simple Photoreceptors (Photoresponsive Neurons)

Several simple photoreceptors (photoresponsive neurons) have been identified on the dorsal aspect of the central ganglia of Onchidium verruculatum, a species closely related to Aplysia (Hisano et al., 1972; Gotow, 1989; Nishi and Gotow, 1998). Of these simple photoreceptors, which were designated Ep-2, Ep-3, Es-1, A-P-1, Ip-1, and Ip-2, A-P-1 and Es-1 respond to light with a depolarizing receptor potential, which is associated with a decrease in membrane K+ conductance (Gotow, 1989; Nishi and Gotow, 1992); whereas, Ip-1 and Ip-2 are hyperpolarized by light, owing to an increase in membrane K+ conductance (Nishi and Gotow, 1998). These intrinsic photoresponses persist even when synaptic transmission is blocked either chemically or by ligation of the axo-somatic junction. Ep-2 and Ep-3 are depolarized by light, but their depolarizing mechanism is still unknown. However, we have evidence that Ep-2 and Ep-3 are also depolarized by a similar mechanism to that of A-P-1 and Es-1. Both of these depolarizing and hyperpolarizing photoresponses take 20 to 30 s to reach their peak after a latency of 300 to 500 ms following a brief light stimulus and then decline gradually. This contrasts with the fast and adaptive photoresponses of a few milliseconds to a few seconds in classical eye photoreceptors, e.g. the proximal and distal cells of Pecten (McReynolds and Gorman, 1970) and the stalk eyes of Onchidium (Katagiri et al., 1985). When eliciting electrophysiological responses, the action spectrum peaked at about 490 nm in A-P-1 (Gotow, 1989) and at about 580 nm in Es-1 (Nishi and Gotow, 1992), while those in Ip-1 and Ip-2 both peaked at about 510 nm, suggesting that each of their photoresponses is mediated by a single photopigment. Unfortunately, this photopigment has not yet been found in the Onchidium simple photoreceptors, although the presence of a rhodopsin-like protein was suggested in the Aplysia photoresponsive neuron R2 (Robles et al., 1986). On the other hand, the Onchidium photoresponsive neurons as well as the above mentioned Aplysia neurons are indistinguishable from the other light insensitive neurons in the ganglion by visual inspection. Electron microscopic observation showed that these photoresponsive neurons lack morphologically specialized structures, such as microvilli or cilia, that are characteristic of classical eye photoreceptors (Frazier et al., 1967; Kubozono, 1988). Thus, we consider that these photoresponsive neurons should be termed “simple photoreceptors”. In addition, the simple photoreceptors in the Onchidium and Aplysia ganglia are not only first-order photosensory cells, but are also second-order neurons (interneurons), relaying several kinds of sensory inputs (Frazier et al., 1967; Gotow, 1975; Nishi et al., 2006), similar to those in the crayfish ganglion.

Recently, similar simple photoreceptors without microvilli or cilia, the ipRGC, were discovered in mammalian rat and mouse retinas (Berson et al., 2002; Hattar et al., 2002). Their studies suggested that their visual pigment may be melanopsin, an invertebrate-like photopigment, which was first identified in frog skin by Provencio et al. (1998). The latest studies have provided compelling evidence that melanopsin is the photopigment of the ipRGC (Melyan et al., 2005; Panda et al., 2005; Qiu et al., 2005). According to Berson (2003) and Do et al. (2009), the ipRGC show a delayed, slow, and lasting depolarizing photoresponse (in the order of a few seconds to tens of seconds) following a suitably brief light stimulation, which is different from the fast and adaptive hyperpolarizing response (in the order of a few milliseconds to tens of milliseconds) seen in cones and rods. In addition to being primary photosensory cells, the ipRGC are also second-order interneurons, relaying photic inputs from rods/cones to the brain. These characteristics of a lack of morphologically specialized structures, morphological arrangement as second-order neurons, and slow photoresponse kinetics in the ipRGC parallel those of the invertebrate Onchidium simple photoreceptors mentioned above. This reminds us that the mammalian ipRGC seem to be homologous to the invertebrate Onchidium simple photoreceptors.

Phototransduction Mechanism

The primary function of simple photoreceptors and eye photoreceptors is to convert light energy into an electrical response, namely the receptor potential that is generated by light-dependent conductance or channels. Little work has been done on the ionic conductance mechanism in the excitatory, depolarizing photoresponses of the simple photoreceptors in crayfish (Kennedy, 1963) and Aplysia (Arvanitaki and Chalazonitis, 1961) ganglia.

A single-channel analysis showed that the depolarizing photoresponses of A-P-1 and Es-1 cells are produced by the closing of one class of K+ -selective channel (Gotow, 1989; Gotow et al., 1994; Gotow and Nishi, 2002). Later, it was reported that the Helix simple photoreceptors also respond to light with membrane depolarization, due to a decrease in K+ conductance (Pasic and Kartelija, 1995). On the other hand, we demonstrated that the hyperpolarizing receptor potential of Ip-2 and Ip-1 cells results from the opening of the same K+ -selective channel that induces hyperpolarizing receptor potentials in A-P-1 and Es-1 cells (Nishi and Gotow, 1998; Gotow and Nishi, 2002).

It is thought that the hyperpolarizing photoresponses of most vertebrate eye photoreceptors (rods and cones) are produced by the closing of non-selective cation channels or by a decrease in membrane cation conductance (Tomita, 1972; Owen, 1986; Matthews and Watanabe, 1987). Only one known exception has been found, the lizard parietal eye photoreceptors, which responds to light with depolarization resulting from the opening of non-selective cation channels similar to those of the above mentioned vertebrate eye photoreceptors (Solessio and Engbretson, 1993). Except for this parietal photoreceptor, the above mentioned mechanism contrasts with that in the eye photoreceptors studied to date in invertebrates, which are present in most members of the animal kingdom; i.e., a depolarizing or a hyperpolarizing photoresponse is produced by the opening of membrane cation channels or by an increase in membrane cation conductance (Fuortes, 1963; Washizu, 1964; Brown et al., 1970; Pinto and Brown, 1977; Bacigalupo and Lisman, 1983; Nagy and Stieve, 1990; Nasi and Gomez, 1992; Gomez and Nasi, 1994). Thus, the simple photoreceptors of Onchidium, A-P-1 and Es-1, are the first invertebrate eye or simple photoreceptor in which it has been demonstrated that their photoresponses result from the “closing of channels” or “decreases in conductance”.

The cGMP-gated channels in the vertebrate photoreceptors that close in light are non-selective cation channels permeable to Na+, K+, and Ca2+ (for review, Finn et al., 1996). However, the cGMP-gated channels in the simple photoreceptors of Onchidium that close and open in the light are predominantly K+ selective under physiological ionic conditions such as of K+, Na+, Ca2+, Mg2+ and Cl–; i.e., the contributions of these ions except for K+ to these channels is negligible (Gotow, 1989; Gotow et al., 1994; Nishi and Gotow, 1998; Gotow and Nishi, 2002). Interestingly, we have found that the K+ -selective channels of the simple photoreceptors of Onchidium can be specifically blocked by the external addition of 0.1–0.2 mM 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) or 0.2–0.4 mM L-cis-diltiazem (L-DIL) (Gotow et al., 1997; Nishi and Gotow, 1998). L-DIL, a stereoisomer of the D-type Ca2+ channel blocker, specifically blocks the non-selective cation channels in vertebrate rod and cone cells (Stern et al., 1986; Rispoli and Menini, 1988; Haynes, 1992; McLatchie and Matthews, 1994) and light -dependent K+ conductance in Pecten hyperpolarizing eye (ciliary) cells (Gomez and Nasi, 1997). 4-AP is another well-known blocker of K+ channels, e.g., the IA or KA channels, which are transiently activated in the subthreshold range of membrane potentials (Hagiwara et al., 1961; Hermann and Gorman, 1981; Hille, 1992).

As described above, the simple photoreceptors A-P-1 and Es-1, which are depolarized by light, seem to be homologous to the vertebrate eye photoreceptors in the sense that both of their cGMP-gated channels are closed by light, although the polarity of their receptor potentials is reversed. This homology prompted us to examine whether the phototransduction cGMP cascade model used for vertebrate rod and cone photoreceptors (Fesenko et al., 1985, for review, Finn et al., 1996; Kaupp and Seifert, 2002) can be applied to that of A-P-1 or Es-1. According to the cGMP cascade model, cGMP acts as a second messenger that opens cGMP-gated non-selective cation channels, allowing the channels to close when light activates PDE (phosphodiesterase) in order to reduce internal cGMP levels through a Gt-type G-protein (transducin), thereby leading to a hyperpolarizing response (Table 1). As in the above mentioned vertebrate cGMP cascade, we also concluded that cGMP acts as a second messenger that opens the cGMP-gated K+-selective channels of the simple photoreceptors A-P-1 and Es-1, allowing the channels to close when light activates PDE (phosphodiesterase) in order to reduce cGMP levels through a Gt-type G-protein (Gt), thereby leading to depolarization (Gotow et al., 1994; Gotow and Nishi, 2002), as shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Phototransduction cGMP cascade models of simple photoreceptors.

graphic file with name fncel-03-018-t001.jpg

Open in a new tab

*The Rod/Cone (Eye photoreceptors) phototransduction cascade is shown for comparison: Derived from the review by Finn et al. (1996), Kaupp and Seifert (2002). A-P-1/Es-1: Depolarizing A-P-1 and Es-1 cells. Ip-1/Ip-2: Hyperpolarizing Ip-1 and Ip-2 cells. Rh: Visual pigments, PDE: Phosphodiesterase, GC: Guanylate cyclase.

On the other hand, we found that the hyperpolarizing photoresponses of other types of simple photoreceptor, Ip-2 and Ip-1 cells, are produced by the opening of the same type of channel that is closed in A-P-1 and Es-1 cells (Gotow and Nishi, 2002). Thus, Gotow and Nishi (2007) have proposed a new type of cGMP cascade model in which Ip-2 and Ip-1 cells are hyperpolarized when light activates GC (guanylate cyclase) through a Go-type G-protein (Go), leading to an increase in the level of the second messenger cGMP, thereby producing the opening of the same channels opened in A-P-1 and Es-1 cells (see also Table 1). A similar phototransduction model has also been suggested to operate in a different system, the scallop ciliary eye photoreceptor (Kojima et al., 1997; Gomez and Nasi, 1995, 2000). Unfortunately, no molecular identification of the visual pigment or G-protein involved in phototransduction has yet been undertaken in the simple photoreceptors of Onchidium.

In the related Aplysia simple photoreceptor R2, it has long been known that when illuminated, R2 hyperpolarizes due to an increase in membrane K+ conductance and that this light-dependent K+ conductance is activated by a rise in the intracellular levels of Ca2+; i.e., the light-dependent K+ conductance is equivalent to this Ca2+-activated K+ conductance (Meech, 1972; Brown and Brown, 1973; Brown et al., 1977). However, no single-channel analysis of the hyperpolarizing photoresponse in R2 has been undertaken.

Furthermore, a considerable amount of information has been obtained about the photochemistry of melanopsin in ipRGC (for review, He et al., 2003; Peirson and Foster, 2006). For example, it has been suggested that melanopsin activates phospholipase C through the Gq G-protein, as in Drosophila rhabdomeric photoreceptors (Raghu et al., 2000; for review, Hardie, 2003). However, the cell membrane channels and their channel-gating mechanism that mediate the photoreceptor potential of ipRGC have not yet been identified, so the phototransduction mechanism that couples melanopsin to its photoreceptor potential remains unknown (for review, Berson, 2007).

Photosensitivity of Simple Photoreceptors In Vivo

The simple photoreceptors in the central ganglia, which are well covered by the animal's body wall, seem to be unsuitable as a classical photosensory system, but these simple photoreceptors may have adapted to serve as a new photosensory modality; i.e., non-image-forming vision.

The amount of light energy transmitted through the Onchidium body wall, which is composed of the mantle and foot, was measured and compared with the energy required for a minimally detectable photoresponse in their simple photoreceptors. The spectral energy of incident sunlight was also measured in the centre of Kagoshima, which corresponds to that at Sakurajima beach, the home of the Onchidium tested.

These analyses supported the assertion that the transmittance of daylight through the animal's body wall is high enough to stimulate the simple photoreceptors of the Onchidium in vivo (Gotow et al., 2005). Brown et al. (1977) have also reported that the amount of light energy required to stimulate the simple photoreceptors of the Aplysia in vivo can be provided by the transmittance through the animal's body wall.

Non-image-forming visual function:

  1. Depolarizing Ep-2, Ep-3, and Es-1 cells

  2. Hyperpolarizing Ip-1 and Ip-2 cells

Little has been definitively established about the functional significance of simple photoreceptors. In spite of a concerted effort to elucidate the functions of the 6th abdominal ganglion simple photoreceptors of crayfish, many questions remain (for review, Wilkens, 1988). It has only been postulated that the simple photoreceptors of crayfish operate in the general regulation of synaptic transmission (Kennedy, 1963; Wilkens and Larimer, 1972; Pei et al., 1996). The function of the simple photoreceptors of Aplysia (Arvanitaki and Chalazonitis, 1961; Brown and Brown, 1973) is also unknown. However, it has been reported that Aplysia demonstrate light-entrained behavior in the absence of bilateral eyes and that simple photoreceptors such as R2 may be involved in such behavior (Block and Lickey, 1973; Block et al., 1974).

Onchidium are intertidal and amphibian mollusks. Thus, they use gill-trees at high tide, but at low tide they begin to use their lung (pulmonary sac) for respiration and crawl over the rocks on the exposed seashore in order to obtain food or to reproduce. Occasionally, Onchidium slip and turn over, while rock- crawling. In such cases, these animals pick themselves up through a chain of behavioral responses, such as the mantle-levating reflex (Gotow et al., 1973). This mantle-levating reflex is also reproducibly triggered by tactile stimulation of the animal's dorsal surface, the mantle.

On the other hand, Gotow (1975) and Gotow et al. (1973) have shown that the first-order depolarizing simple photoreceptors Ep-2, Ep-3, and Es-1 are not only second-order neurons relaying tactile sensory inputs from the mantle through the specified peripheral nerves, but are also motoneurons innervating the mantle and foot (mesopodium) so the combined spike activity evoked by tactile synaptic transmission in these three cell types results in a levation movement of the mantle equivalent to the mantle-levating reflex (Figure 1A). They have also shown that all excitatory synaptic transmissions and potentials induced by tactile sensory inputs in these cells are potentiated during light illumination, even when the preceding light stimulus is subthreshold. Thus, it has been suggested that the depolarizing photoresponses of Ep-2, Ep-3, and Es-1 cells play a role in the potentiation of the excitatory synaptic transmission and potentials related tactile sensory inputs and the subsequent mantle-levating reflex (Gotow et al., 1973) and so may be involved in a new photosensory modality, non-image-forming vision.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Chart showing a new photosensory function of Onchidium simple photoreceptors, (A) depolarizing and (B) hyperpolarizing cells. See text for details.

At low tide, the amphibian mollusks Onchidium open their pneumostome, the orifice of their pulmonary sac, in order to begin aero-respiration, although they close the pneumostome at high tide. The opening of the pneumostome; i.e., an aero- breathing behavior, can also be reproducibly triggered by removal of the surrounding seawater from the animal's body surface such as the mantle, pneumostome, etc. or by moving the animal from underwater to air.

On the other hand, Nishi et al. (2006) and Gotow and Nishi (2008) have found that the first-order hyperpolarizing simple photoreceptors Ip-1 and Ip-2 are not only second-order neurons that receive inhibitory presynaptic inputs, such as water pressure and/or tactile signals arising from the animal's body surface, but are also interneurons (motor-like neurons) involved in aero-breathing behavior. Thus, they suggested that at low tide these cells are released from inhibitory sensory synaptic inputs such as water pressure and/or touch and begin to produce endogenous spike discharges, thereby leading to opening of the pneumostome (Figure 1B).

An attempt to examine the effects of light on the hyperpolarizing Ip-1 and Ip-2 cells showed that inhibitory synaptic transmissions and potentials related to pressure and/or tactile sensory inputs in these cells are potentiated during light illumination, even if the preceding light stimulus is subthreshold. This result suggested that the hyperpolarizing photoresponse of Ip-1 and Ip-2 cells operates in the potentiation of inhibitory synaptic transmission as well as in the suppression of subsequent aero-breathing behavior (Nishi et al., 2006; Gotow and Nishi, 2008) and so may also be involved in the above mentioned new photosensory modality.

The above mentioned potentiation of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic transmission by simple photoreceptors occurred even when their photoresponses were subthreshold, demonstrating true “potentiation” rather than only “summation”; i.e., the sum of synaptic potentials and photoreceptor potentials. Furthermore, we refer to this potentiation as “long-lasting potentiation”. As the photoresponses of simple photoreceptors can last for hours and even days, they are effective during most daylight hours.

On the other hand, it has been reported that ipRGC operate in non-visual functions such as the pupillary light reflex and circadian photoentrainment (Panda et al., 2002, 2003; Ruby et al., 2002; Hattar et al., 2003; Lucas et al., 2003). However, nothing is known about their light-sensing functions as interneurons. Most recently, Do et al. (2009) reported that the ipRGC in transgenic mice modulated rod/cone response and synaptic signal transmission from amacrine and bipolar cells, etc. to the brain.

Conclusion

Simple photoreceptors similar to those of Onchidium have been known to exist in the central ganglion of crayfish, Aplysia, and Helix since the 1930s. Recently, similar simple photoreceptors, ipRGC, have been discovered in the ganglion cells of mammalian retinas. It was suggested that the simple photoreceptors of Onchidium as well as ipRGC function as a new sensory modality, non-image-forming vision, which is different from the image-forming vision of classical eye photoreceptors. As non-image-forming functions of ipRGC, it is known that they contribute to pupillary light reflex and circadian clocks. However, their light-sensing function as interneurons has not been ascertained. An Onchidium study showed that simple photoreceptors (Ep-2, Ep-3, A-P-1, Es-1, Ip-1, and Ip-2) play roles in the long-lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission of excitatory and inhibitory sensory inputs as well as in the potentiation and suppression of the subsequent behavioral responses. Figure 1 shows a chart that explains these non-image-forming functions of simple photoreceptors. Interestingly, it seems that both simple photoreceptors and classical eye photoreceptors use the same phototransduction and channel-gating mechanisms (see Table1), in spite of the great difference in the functions of these two types of photoreceptors.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Arvanitaki A., Chalazonitis N. (1961). Excitatory and inhibitory processes initiated by light and infra-red radiations in single identifiable nerve cells (giant ganglion cells of Aplysia). In Nervous inhibition, Florey E. ed. (Oxford, Pergamon; ), pp. 194–231 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bacigalupo J., Lisman J. E. (1983). Single-channel currents activated by light in Limulus ventral photoreceptors. Nature 304, 268–270 10.1038/304268a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berson D. M. (2003). Strange vision: ganglion cells as circadian photoreceptors. Trends Neurosci. 26, 314–320 10.1016/S0166-2236(03)00130-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Berson D. M. (2007). Phototransduction in ganglion-cell photoreceptors. Pflugers Arch. 454, 849–855 10.1007/s00424-007-0242-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Berson D. M., Dunn F. A., Takao M. (2002). Phototransduction by retinal ganglion cells that set the circadian clock. Science 295, 1070–1073 10.1126/science.1067262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Block G. D., Hudson D. J., Lickey M. E. (1974). Extraocular photoreceptors can entrain the circadian oscillator in the eye of Aplysia. J. comp. Physiol. 89, 237–249 10.1007/BF00696189 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Block G. D., Lickey M. E. (1973). Extraocular photoreceptors and oscillators can control the circadian rhythm of behavioral activity in Aplysia. J. comp. Physiol. 84, 367–374 10.1007/BF00696349 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown A. M., Brodwick M. S., Eaton D. C. (1977). Intracellular calcium and extra-retinal photoreception in Aplysia giant neurons. J. Neurobiol. 8, 1–18 10.1002/neu.480080102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Brown A. M., Brown H. M. (1973). Light response of a giant Aplysia neuron. J. Gen. Physiol. 62, 239–254 10.1085/jgp.62.3.239 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Brown H. M., Hagiwara S., Koike H., Meech R. M. (1970). Membrane properties of a barnacle photoreceptor examined by the voltage clamp technique. J. Physiol 208, 385–413 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Do M. T., Kang S. H., Xue T., Zhong H., Liao H. W., Bergles D. E., Yau K. W. (2009). Photon capture and signalling by melanopsin retinal ganglion cells. Nature 457, 281–287 10.1038/nature07682 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fesenko E. E., Kolesnikov S. S., Lyubarsky A. L. (1985). Induction by cyclic GMP of cationic conductance in plasma membrane of retinal rod outer segment. Nature 313, 310–313 10.1038/313310a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Finn J. T., Grunwald M. E., Yau K. W. (1996). Cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channels: an extended family with diverse functions. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 58, 395–426 10.1146/annurev.ph.58.030196.002143 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Frazier W. T., Kandel E. R., Kuppermann I., Waziri R., Coggeshall R. E. (1967). Morphological and functional properties of identified neurons in the abdominal ganglion of Aplysia californica. J. Neurophysiol. 30, 1288–1351 [Google Scholar]
  15. Fuortes M. G. F. (1963). Visual responses in the eye of the dragonfly. Science 142, 69–70 10.1126/science.142.3588.69 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gomez M., Nasi E. (1994). The light-sensitive conductance of hyperpolarizing invertebrate photoreceptors: a patch-clamp study. J. Gen. Physiol 103, 939–956 10.1085/jgp.103.6.939 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gomez M., Nasi E. (1995). Activation of light-dependent K+ channels in ciliary invertebrate photoreceptors involves cGMP but not the IP3/Ca2+ cascade. Neuron 15, 607–618 10.1016/0896-6273(95)90149-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gomez M., Nasi E. (1997). Antagonists of the cGMP-gated conductance of vertebrate rods block the photocurrent in scallop ciliary photoreceptors. J. Physiol. 500, 367–378 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gomez M., Nasi E. (2000). Light transduction in invertebrate hyperpolarizing photoreceptors: possible involvement of a Go-regulated guanylate cyclase. J. Neurosci. 20, 5254–5263 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gotow T. (1975). Morphology and function of the photoexcitable neurones in the central ganglion of Onchidium verruculatum. J. Comp. Physiol. 99, 139–152 10.1007/BF00618180 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gotow T. (1989). Photoresponses of an extraocular photoreceptor associated with a decrease in membrane conductance in an opisthobranch mollusc. Brain Res. 479, 120–129 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gotow T., Nishi T. (2002). Light-dependent K+ channels in the mollusc Onchidium simple photoreceptors are opened by cGMP. J. Gen. Physiol. 120, 581–597 10.1085/jgp.20028619 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Gotow T., Nishi T. (2007). Involvement of a Go-type G-protein coupled to guanylate cyclase in the phototransduction cGMP cascade of molluscan simple photoreceptors. Brain Res. 1144, 42–51 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.01.068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gotow T., Nishi T. (2008). Simple photoreceptors in some invertebrates: physiological properties of a new photosensory modality. Brain Res. 1225, 3–16 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.04.059 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Gotow T., Nishi T., Kijima H. (1994). Single K+ channels closed by light and opened by cyclic GMP in molluscan extra-ocular photoreceptor cells. Brain Res. 662, 268–272 10.1016/0006-8993(94)90824-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Gotow T., Nishi T., Murakami M. (1997). 4-Aminopyridine and L-cis-diltiazem block the cGMP-activated K+ channels closed by light in the molluscan extra-ocular photoreceptors. Brain Res. 745, 303–308 10.1016/S0006-8993(96)01214-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Gotow T., Shimotsu K., Nishi T. (2005). Non-image forming function of the extraocular photoreceptors in the ganglion of the sea slug Onchidium. Brain, vision, and artificial intelligence. In Proceedings of First International Symposium, Gregorio M. D., Maio V. D., Frucci M., Musio C. eds (Berlin, Springer; ), pp. 136–145 [Google Scholar]
  28. Gotow T., Tateda H., Kuwabara M. (1973). The function of photoexcitive neurones in the central ganglia for behavioral activity of the marine mollusc Onchidium verruculatum. J. comp. Physiol. 83, 361–376 10.1007/BF00696352 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hagiwara S., Kusano K., Saito N. (1961). Membrane changes of Onchidium nerve cell in potassium-rich media. J. Physiol. 155, 470–489 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hardie R. C. (2003). Regulation of TRP channels via lipid second messengers. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 65, 735–759 10.1146/annurev.physiol.65.092101.142505 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hattar S., Liao H.-W., Takao M., Berson D. M., Yau K. W. (2002). Melanopsin-containing retinal ganglion cells: architecture, projections, and intrinsic photosensitivity. Science 295, 1065–1070 10.1126/science.1069609 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Hattar S., Lucas R. J., Mrosovsky N., Thompson S., Douglas R. H., Hankins M. W., Lem J., Biel M., Hofmann F., Foster R. G., Yau K. W. (2003). Melanopsin and rod-cone photoreceptive systems account for all major accessory visual functions in mice. Nature 424, 76–81 10.1038/nature01761 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Haynes L. W. (1992). Block of the cyclic GMP-gated channel of vertebrate rod and cone photoreceptors by L-cis-diltiazem. J. Gen. Physiol. 100, 783–801 10.1085/jgp.100.5.783 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. He S., Dong W., Deng Q., Weng S., Sun W. (2003). Seeing more clearly: Recent advances in understanding retinal circuitry. Science 302, 408–411 10.1126/science.1085457 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Hermann A., Gorman A. L. F. (1981). Effects of 4-aminopyridine on potassium currents in a molluscan neurons. J. Gen. Physiol. 78, 63–86 10.1085/jgp.78.1.63 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Hille B. (1992). Ionic Channels of Excitable Membranes, 2nd Edn Sunderland, MA, Sinauer [Google Scholar]
  37. Hisano N., Tateda H., Kuwabara M. (1972). A Photosensitive neurones in the marine pulmonate mollusc Onchidium verruculatum. J. Exp. Biol. 57, 651–660 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Katagiri Y., Katagiri N., Fujimoto K. (1985). Morphological and electrophysiological studies of a multiple photoreceptive system in a marine gastropod, Onchidium. Neurosci. Res. Suppl. 2, S1–S15 10.1016/0921-8696(85)90004-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kaupp U. B., Seifert R. (2002). Cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channels. Physiol. Rev. 82, 769–824 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kennedy D. (1963). Physiology of photoreceptor neurons in the abdominal nerve cord of the crayfish. J. Gen. Physiol. 46, 551–572 10.1085/jgp.46.3.551 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kojima D., Terakita A., Ishikawa T., Tsukahara Y., Maeda A., Shichida Y. (1997). A novel Go-mediated phototransduction cascade in scallop visual cells. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 22979–22982 10.1074/jbc.272.37.22979 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Kubozono T. (1988). A study on an extraocular photoreceptor in the central ganglia of the marine gastropod mollusc, Onchidium verruculatum. (in Japanese). Med. J. Kagoshima Univ 40, 161–178 [Google Scholar]
  43. Lucas R. J., Hattar S., Takao M., Berson D. M., Foster R. G., Yau K. W. (2003). Diminished pupillary light reflex at high irradiances in melanopsin-knockout mice. Science 299, 245–247 10.1126/science.1077293 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Matthews G., Watanabe S. (1987). Properties of ion channels closed by light and opened by guanosine 3′,5′-cyclic monophosphate in toad retinal rods. J. Physiol. 389, 691–715 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. McLatchie L. M., Matthews H. R. (1994). The effect of pH on the block by L-cis-diltiazem and amiloride of the cyclic GMP-activated conductance of salamander rods. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 255, 231–236 10.1098/rspb.1994.0033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. McReynolds J. S., Gorman A. L. (1970). Photoreceptor potentials of opposite polarity in the eye of the scallop, Pecten irradians. J. Gen. Physiol. 56, 376–391 10.1085/jgp.56.3.376 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Meech R. W. (1972). Intracellular calcium injection causes increased potassium conductance in Aplysia nerve cells. Comp. Biochem. Physiol., A 42, 493–499 10.1016/0300-9629(72)90128-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Melyan Z., Tarttelin E. E., Bellingham R. J., Lucas M., Hankins W. (2005). Addition of human melanopsin renders mammalian cells photoresponsive. Nature 433, 741–745 10.1038/nature03344 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Nagy K., Stieve H. (1990). Light-activated single channel currents in Limulus ventral nerve photoreceptors. Euro. Biophys. J 18, 220–224 10.1007/BF00183374 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Nasi E., Gomez M. (1992). Light-activated ion channels in solitary photoreceptors from the eye of the scallop Pecten irradians. J. Gen. Physiol 99, 747–769 10.1085/jgp.99.5.747 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Nishi T., Gotow T. (1992). A neural mechanism for processing colour information in molluscan extra- ocular photoreceptors. J. Exp. Biol. 168, 77–91 [Google Scholar]
  52. Nishi T., Gotow T. (1998). Light-increased cGMP and K+ conductance in the hyperpolarizing receptor potential of Onchidium extra- ocular photoreceptors. Brain Res. 809, 325–336 10.1016/S0006-8993(98)00913-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Nishi T., Gotow T., Nakagawa S. (2006). Non-image-forming visual function of the simple photoreceptors in the sea slug Onchidium ganglion. Neurosci. Res. 55, S176 [Google Scholar]
  54. Owen W. G. (1986). The light-induced conductance change in the vertebrate rod. In The Molecular Mechanism of Photoreception, Stieve H. ed. (Berlin, Springer-Verlag; ) pp. 171–187 [Google Scholar]
  55. Panda S., Nayak K. S., Campo B., Walker J. R., Hogenesch J. B., Jegla T. (2005). Illumination of the melanopsin signaling pathway. Science 307, 600–604 10.1126/science.1105121 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Panda S., Provencio I., Tu D. C., Pires S. S., Rollag M. D., Castrucci A. M., Pletcher M. T., Sato T. K., Wiltshire T., Steve A., Kay S. A., Van Gelder R. N., Hogenesch J. B. (2003). Melanopsin is required for non-image-forming photic responses in blind mice. Science 301, 525–527 10.1126/science.1086179 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Panda S., Sato T. K., Castrucci A. M., Rollag M. D., DeGrip W. J., Hogenesch J. B., Provencio I., Kay S. A. (2002). Melanopsin (Opn4) requirement for normal light-induced circadian phase shifting. Science 298, 2213–2216 10.1126/science.1076848 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Pasic M., Kartelija G. (1995). The reaction of Helix photosensitive neurons to light and cyclic GMP. Neuroscience 69, 557–565 10.1016/0306-4522(95)00234-A [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Pei X., Wilkens L. A., Moss F. (1996). Light enhances hydrodynamic signaling in the multimodal caudal photoreceptor interneurons of the crayfish. J. Neurophysiol. 76, 3002–3011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Peirson S., Foster R. G. (2006). Melanopsin: another way of signaling light. Neuron 49, 331–339 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.01.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Pinto L. H., Brown J. E. (1977). Intracellular recordings from photoreceptors of the squid (Loligo pealii). J. Comp. Physiol. A. 122, 241–250 10.1007/BF00611893 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  62. Provencio I., Jiang G., De Grip W. J., Hayes W. P., Rollag M. D. (1998). Melanopsin: an opsin in melanophores, brain, and eye. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 340–345 10.1073/pnas.95.1.340 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Qiu X., Kumbalasiri T., Carlson S. M., Wong K. Y., Krshna V., Provencio I., Berson D. M. (2005). Induction of photosensitivity by heterologous expression of melanopsin. Nature 433, 745–749 10.1038/nature03345 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Raghu P., Usher K., Jonas S., Chyb S., Polyanovsky A., Hardie R. C. (2000). Constitutive activity of the light-sensitive channels TRP and TRPL in the Drosophila diacylglycerol kinase mutant, rdgA. Neuron 26, 169–179 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81147-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Rispoli G., Menini A. (1988). The blocking effect of L-cis-diltiazem on the light-sensitive current of isolated rods of the tiger salamander. Eur. Biophys. J. 16, 65–71 10.1007/BF00255515 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Robles L. J., Breneman J. W., Anderson E. O., Nottoli V. A., Kegler L. L. (1986). Immunocytochemical localization of a rhodopsin-like protein in the lipochondria in photosensitive neurons of Aplysia californica. Cell Tissue Res. 244, 115–120 10.1007/BF00218388 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Ruby N. F., Brennan T. J., Xie X., Cao V., Franken P., Heller H. C., O'Hara B. F. (2002). Role of melanopsin in circadian responses to light. Science 298, 2211–2213 10.1126/science.1076701 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Solessio E., Engbretson G. A. (1993). Antagonistic chromatic mechanisms in photoreceptors of the parietal eye of lizards. Nature 364, 442–445 10.1038/364442a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Stern J. H., Kaupp U. B., MacLeish P. R. (1986). Control of the light- regulated current in rod photoreceptors by cyclic GMP, calcium, and L-cis-diltiazem. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 83, 1163–1167 10.1073/pnas.83.4.1163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Tomita T. (1972). Light-induced potential and resistance changes in vertebrate photoreceptors. In Handbook of Sensory Physiology VII/2, Fuortes M. G. F. ed. (Berlin, Springer-Verlag; ), pp. 483–511 [Google Scholar]
  71. Washizu Y. (1964). Electrical activity of single retinula cells in the compound eye of the blowfly Calliphora erythrocephala Meig. Comp. Biochem. Physiol 12, 369–387 10.1016/0010-406X(64)90066-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  72. Wilkens L. A. (1988). The crayfish caudal photoreceptor: advances and questions after the first half century. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 91C, 61–68 [Google Scholar]
  73. Wilkens L. A., Larimer J. L. (1972). The CNS Photoreceptor of crayfish: morphology and synaptic activity. J. comp. Physiol. 80, 389–407 10.1007/BF00696436 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES