Leave of absence during residency presents significant challenges to program directors and colleagues. Unpredictable events resulting in lost time from the program do occur. The most frequently encountered reason for absence is parental leave. Women now make up more than 50% of paediatric residents, and a significant number become pregnant during their training. Male residents are now more likely to participate in parenting, and other unavoidable short term disability leaves can occur. Scheduling in residency programs does not take these inevitable events into account, creating considerable disruption in an already stressful situation.
Ensuring that residents’ absences do not compromise patient care is the most important issue. Often remaining residents in the department adjust their schedules and work additional hours to provide coverage for clinical work and on-call time. The difficult task of reassigning work usually becomes the responsibility of the chief resident, with variable support provided by the program director. Limited resources mean hiring nonresidents, such as staff physicians and nurse practitioners, to cover for leave happens infrequently.
Without carefully set guidelines, the remaining residents may be overwhelmed by vigorous educational and additional service demands. Combined with sleep deprivation and a lack of attention to personal care, this pressure can lead to feelings of being used and overburdened. Fatigued residents are prone to make mistakes, compromise education and work goals, and blame the system for failure. Not only may residents feel resentful of those taking leave, but there may be loss of compassion for patients.
In addition to coverage for clinical work, it is the program’s responsibility to ensure that educational requirements are fulfilled by the resident requiring leave. Additional costs to the system may be incurred. Funding for medical education is increasingly constrained, and stipends and benefits may not be provided during leave of absence and make-up time. This adds to the stress suffered by often financially burdened residents.
NATIONAL SURVEY
Paediatric programs across Canada vary considerably in the amount of leave granted. Some examples of the amount of leave granted are presented in Table 1.
TABLE 1:
Examples of the amount of leave available to residents in Canadian residency programs
University of Calgary |
|
University of Alberta |
|
McGill University |
|
University of Toronto |
|
Dalhousie University |
|
Université Laval |
|
CONCLUSIONS
Where defined policies for short term leaves can reduce stress and enhance equity for residents who need leave and for their colleagues, there is also a need to accomplish the following:
define and differentiate educational goals from service roles;
ensure strict adherence to educational guidelines to minimize excessive service demands, thus decreasing the burden on the remaining residents; and
increase participation by residents in the policy making process affecting their educational and service functions in programs and on a national level.
Recommendations on parental leave for residents and paediatric training programs by the American Academy of Pediatrics were published in a policy statement in 1995. In an effort to address these issues in Canada, the Residents Section of the Canadian Paediatric Society (CPS) is gathering information from across the nation on program policies. We are excited about the prospect of the draft of the first national guidelines for paediatric residents on short term leave of absence, which will be prepared at the upcoming Residents Section Workshop during the 1997 CPS Annual Meeting in Halifax, Nova Scotia.
Footnotes
RESIDENTS SECTION
Executive members: Drs Lois Sim (President, principal author), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta; Anna Karwowska (Vice President), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta
Liaisons: Drs Leigh A Allwood, Memorial University, St John’s, Newfoundland; Janice Barkey, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba; Roxana K Bolaria, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Sarah Dyack, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta; Henriette Fortin, Université Laval, Québec, Québec; Keyvan Hadad, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia; Dawn S Hartfield, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan; Tanuja Kodeeswaran, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario; Ramsay G MacNay, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario; Michelle M McNeill, The University of Western University, London, Ontario; Paul C Nathan, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario; Derek Prevost, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario; Marie-Noel Primeau, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec; Laura K Purcell, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia
REFERENCES
- 1.Bickel J. Maternity leave policies for residents: An overview of issues and problems. Acad Med. 1989;64:498–501. doi: 10.1097/00001888-198909000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Philibert I, Bickel J. Maternity and parental leave policies at hospitals: An update. Acad Med. 1995;70:1056–8. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199511000-00029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Colford JM, Jr, McPhee SJ. The ravelled sleeve of care. Managing the stresses of residency training. JAMA. 1989;261:889–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.AAP Committee on Early Childhood Education, Adoption and Dependent Programs, Residents Section Parental leave for residents and pediatric training programs. Pediatrics. 1995;96:972–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]