Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Res. 2009 May;65(5 Pt 2):55R–63R. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e31819dca03

Host Genetic Determinants of HIV Infection and Disease Progression in Children

Kumud K Singh 1, Stephen A Spector 1
PMCID: PMC2802664  NIHMSID: NIHMS109468  PMID: 19190524

Abstract

Increasing data support host genetic factors as important determinants of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) susceptibility, mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) and disease progression. Of these genetic mediators, those impacting innate and adaptive immune responses appear to play a critical role in viral infectivity and pathogenesis. During primary infection, CCR5 using virus is predominantly transmitted and polymorphisms that affect the expression of CCR5 alter the risk for MTCT and rate of disease. Chemokines that naturally bind to co-receptors alter infectivity and viral pathogenesis. Additional genes that affect innate immunity including those encoding for MBL2 and those modulating the adaptive immune response including CX3CR1 and HLA types can significantly modify susceptibility and response to HIV-1 infection. As young children develop, the dependence on certain arms of the immune system varies and can alter the effect of genetic variants. Additionally, host genetic factors may alter the response to antiretrovirals. Finally, because HIV-infected children progress more rapidly than adults and have fewer background co-factors such as drug use and co-infections, the effects of host factors on HIV-1 disease may be more clearly identified. In this review, we summarize available data on the impact of host genetics on MTCT and disease progression of HIV-infected children.


Remarkable progress has been made in the interruption of human immunodeficiency type-1 (HIV-1) mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) and treatment for HIV-infected children. However, despite these advances many challenges remain to eliminate MTCT through the safest ways possible and in optimizing antiretroviral therapy for pregnant women and children in developed and developing countries. Infants and children can be particularly susceptible to the long-term effects of antiretroviral exposure. Therefore, approaches that lead to optimal drug exposure with the least potential for toxicity for the individual patient are critical if HIV-infected and exposed children are to lead healthy and productive lives. Moreover, the recent HIV-1 vaccine failures dramatically demonstrate the need to further understand the interactions between host and virus.

HIV usually uses CD4 and a coreceptor to infect cells. The most common HIV coreceptors are the chemokine receptors CCR5 and CXCR4. While most primary infections involve viruses that use CCR5 as a coreceptor, CXCR4 using virus is often identified in persons with more advanced disease and is associated with more rapid disease progression. To enter target cells. HIV interacts with the CD4 receptor via its gp120 protein, thereby stimulating a conformational change in gp120, which exposes a portion of transmembrane glycoprotein gp41, and allows access of the gp120 V-loop to either CCR5 or CXCR4. Subsequently, a peptide in gp41 causes the fusion of the viral envelope and host cell membrane, and allows the viral capsid to enter the target cell.

Host factors are important determinants of susceptibility and pathogenesis of infectious diseases in children and adults. Identifying genetic variants that influence the response to HIV-1 can provide insights into approaches to predict disease progression, can lead to development of new treatments, and can provide new immunologic targets for vaccine development. In this review, we summarize the available data on the impact of host genetics on MTCT and treatment of HIV-infected children. Where appropriate the differences between findings in children compared to adults are discussed. Additionally, we describe the role a particular variant may play in the control of HIV-1 through innate versus adaptive immunity.

I. Genetic variants of co-receptors and their ligands alter HIV-related disease progression

Host and microbial genetics are important determinants of infection and disease outcome. Viruses subvert the immune system by mimicking cellular genes to gain entry into cells and to avoid immunologic detection. With the identification that HIV-1 uses chemokine receptors for cell binding and entry, variants in genes encoding these receptors and their natural ligands have been shown to modify the risk for infection and disease progression. Several single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within the CC chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) coding and regulatory region appear to affect HIV-1 disease. For HIV-1 infection of adults and children, CCR5 is a critical co-receptor modulating perinatal transmission (13) with a deletion of 32-bp from the coding region of the CCR5 gene (Δ32) providing almost complete protection against HIV-1 infection in individuals with the homozygous mutant genotype (CCR5-Δ32/Δ32) (47). Individuals heterozygous for CCR5-wt/Δ32 are less likely to be infected with HIV-1 and show a slower rate of disease progression (2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9). Several SNPs in the regulatory region of the CCR5 gene, including a G to A polymorphism at position 59029, a T to C polymorphism at position 59353 and a C to T polymorphism at position 59356 have been reported to alter the rate of disease progression to AIDS (8, 10).

A polymorphism in the coding region of the CC chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2), a minor HIV-1 co-receptor, at position 180 (G to A polymorphism) leads to expression of an isoleucine replacing a valine at amino acid position 64 (designated as CCR2-64I) and has been associated with slower disease progression of HIV-1 infected adults (9, 11). Similarly, in the 3’-untranslated region of the gene encoding the CXC chemokine SDF-1α, the only natural ligand of the HIV-1 co-receptor CXCR4, a G to A polymorphism at position 801 has been reported to delay the rate of disease progression to AIDS in its homozygous (A/A) form in an initial report (12), but not by others (1315). The SDF1-3’-A polymorphism has also been reported to be associated with increased perinatal transmission of HIV-1 (16). Some of the studies demonstrating these effects are discussed below and are summarized in Table 1 and Figure 1 and Figure 2.

Table 1.

Effects of host genetic factors reported in HIV-1 infected children.

Gene Allele Effects observed Presumed mechanism of
action
References
CCR5 Δ32 Decrease risk of MTCT Knockout CCR5 expression (17)
Δ32 Delay disease
progression and
decrease CNS
Decrease available CCR5 (17)
CCR5 59029A Accelerate disease
progression
Increase CCR5 expression (17)
CCR2 64I No effect Interact with and reduce
CXCR4
(17)
CCL3L1 copy number
variation
Lower copy numbers
accelerate disease
progression
Low copy numbers decrease
CCL3L1 expression levels
(54)
CCL3L1 copy number
variation
Lower copy numbers
affect HIV mother-to-
child-transmission
Low copy numbers decrease
CCL3L1 expression levels
(46)
CXCL12 (SDF-1) 3'A Accelerate disease
progression
Impede CCR5-CXCR4
transition (?)
(17)
CCL2 (MCP-1) −2518-G No effect Stimulate immune response
(?)
(78)
CX3CR1 249I Accelerate disease
progression
Impedes immune response (?) (24)
V249 T280 Delays disease
progression
Enhance immune response (?) (24)
IL-4 −589T No significant effect Increase IL-4 expression,
Enhances immune response
(76)
MBL-2 A/B/C/D
Or A/O
Enhance infection
Accelerate AIDS
decrease MBL expression,
incorrect assembly makes
protein vulnerable to
degradation by
metalloproteinases
(61)
H/L, X/Y Enhance infection
Accelerate AIDS
Genetic variant at promoter
positions, decrease MBL
expression
(61)
P/Q Enhance infection
Accelerate AIDS
Genetic variant at 5’
untranslated region, decrease
MBL expression
(61)
APOBEC3G H186R Accelerate HIV disease
and
CNS Impairment
Changes histidine to arginine
(CAC-CGC) at 186 amino acid
position in exon 4
(Singh & Spector)
Accepted, 16th Congress on
Retroviruses & Opportunistic
Infections, Feb 8–11, 2009,
Montreal, Canada
F119F Accelerate HIV disease
and
CNS Impairment
Changes TTC-TTT, but no
change for phenylalanine at
119 amino acid position
HLA Class I Maternal HLA
homozygosity
and mother-
child HLA
concordance
Increase the risk of
vertical transmission of
HIV-1
Increased risk may be due to
reduced alloimmunity or less
diverse protective immune
responses
(69, 70)
HLA
Class I
homozygous
HLA-B or C
alleles
More rapid disease
progression
Loss of heterozygous
advantage, hence lesser
variety of antigenic peptides to
T cells and weaker response
to HIV epitopes
(Singh & Spector)
Accepted, 16th Congress on
Retroviruses & Opportunistic
Infections, Feb 8–11, 2009,
Montreal, Canada
B*27 Slower disease
progression
Immunodominant CTL
responses to the HIV peptides
B*57 Slower disease
progression
Restriction of virus replication
HLA
Class II
DQB1*2 Protect against HIV-1
disease progression
and CNS impairment.
Effective CD4+ lymphocyte
mediated immune response
against HIV
(Singh & Spector)
Accepted, 16th Congress on
Retroviruses & Opportunistic
Infections, Feb 8–11, 2009,
Montreal, Canada

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Points where genetics can affect innate and adaptive immunity, and alter HIV-1 related disease progression.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Genetic variants identified to alter HIV-1 mother-to-child transmission. Examples include CCR5 Δ32, CCR5 promoter, CX3CR1, CCR2, SDF-1, CCL3L1, MBL2, HLA, and HLA concordance. Figure adapted from Spector SA, J Clin Invest 107:267–269, Copyright © 2001, The American Society for Clinical Investigation, with permission.

In a cohort of over 1000 HIV-infected children who participated in Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group (PACTG) 152 or 300 protocols and received mono- or dual-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTIs) treatment before the availability of effective antiretroviral therapy, we studied the effects of CCR2-V64I, CCR5-wt/Δ32, CCR5-59029-G/A, CCR5-59353-T/C, CCR5-59356-C/T and SDF1-3’-G/A polymorphisms on the rate of disease progression and neurological impairment (17). These studies confirmed that the CCR5-wt/Δ32 genotype is associated with slower disease progression. HIV-infected children with the CCR5-wt/Δ32 genotype at study entry had higher mean CD4+ lymphocyte counts, CD4+ percentages and cognitive scores, and lower plasma HIV-1 RNA levels than those with the wt/wt genotype. Moreover, children with the CCR5-wt/Δ32 genotype were less likely to be severely impaired (cognitive index score <70) at baseline or experience CNS impairment than those with the homozygous wild-type. Although there was a clear benefit observed from the CCR5-wt/Δ32 genotype, protection was incomplete and some children did experience disease progression in this group. Because HIV-1 co-receptor usage may change over time in a given individual, it is possible that a switch from CCR5 to CXCR4 usage, which is associated with accelerated disease progression in adults and children (1821), may have occurred in some of those who progressed.

Despite the important impact of the CCR5-32bp deletion in delaying disease (12% versus 26% of those with and without the 32bp deletion progressed within two years), the Δ32 variant occurred in only 6% of the total cohort. In contrast, a genetic variant within the CCR5 promoter region, 59029-A/A was found in ~25% of HIV-infected children and was associated with an almost 50% increase in disease progression when compared to those with the G/A or G/G genotype. Therefore, on a population basis, the CCR5-59029-G/A genetic variants have a greater overall impact on HIV-related disease in children than the CCR5-wt/Δ32 variant. Another variant in the CCR5 promoter region at position 59353-C/T was found to have an almost 40% greater risk for children with the C/C genotype having a cognitive-index score of <70 compared to those with the T allele.

The impact of CCR2 on HIV-related disease remains controversial. Although CCR2 is recognized as a minor co-receptor for HIV-1 in vitro, whether it serves as a co-receptor in humans remains to be clarified. However, several studies in adults have identified that a CCR2 variant, CCR2-64I, alters disease progression (9, 11, 13). In contrast, we have found no association between disease progression and death with any of the CCR2 genotypes. The reason(s) for the different effects observed in children versus adults with the CCR2 variants are unclear. However, it is likely that the alteration in disease progression found in adults results from modulation of the immune response to HIV-1 as related to the binding of CCR2 with its ligand MCP1 (CCL2). It is possible that the broad immaturity of the immune system of young children compared to adults masks any effect this interaction may have on viral control.

The natural ligand for CXCR4, SDF-1, has also been associated with HIV-1 disease in some studies of adults and children. In our own research, children with the CCR5-wt/wt genotype and the SDF1-3’-A/A variant were more likely to experience disease progression than those with either the G/A or G/G genotypes. These findings are consistent with other studies in children that reported slower disease progression associated with the SDF1-3’-A/A genotype (22, 23). However, only a small number of individuals within a given population have the SDF1-3’-A/A genotype (<2% in our studies).

II. A chemokine receptor genetic variant that affects inflammatory cell recruitment alters HIV-1 disease progression independent of CD4+ lymphocyte count and HIV-1 RNA load

Clinical monitoring of infected persons relies on monitoring of CD4+ lymphocyte count and viral load where the plasma HIV-1 RNA predicts that rate of disease progression, while the CD4+ count is used as a predictor of the current risk an individual will develop an HIV-related complication. Our studies of the chemokine receptor CX3CR1 demonstrate how host genetics has the potential to provide additional information about an individual’s risk for disease progression and related complications independent of CD4+ count and viral load (24).

CX3CR1 belongs to a family of G-protein coupled receptors and is a leukocyte chemotactic and adhesion receptor for fractalkine (25) and may also serve as a minor HIV-1 co-receptor (26, 27). Two non-synonymous polymorphisms in the coding region of the CX3CR1 gene were initially identified as possibly being associated with more rapid disease progression in HIV-1 infected adults (28): a ‘G’ to ‘A’ polymorphism at nucleotide position 745 changes a valine to isoleucine at amino acid position 249 (V/I249) in the sixth transmembrane domain and a ‘C’ to ‘T’ polymorphism at nucleotide position 849 changes a threonine to methionine at amino acid 280 (T/M280) in the seventh transmembrane domain of CX3CR1 protein. Faure and colleagues reported that HIV-1 infected persons homozygous for CX3CR1-M280 progress to AIDS more rapidly than those with other genotypes (29). In another study, Brumme et al found a trend toward an association of the I249-T280 and I249-M280 haplotypes with early immunological failure in HIV-1 infected adults (30).

The expression of CX3CR1 and its ligand, fractalkine, are increased during HIV-1 infection and are reduced on treatment with effective active antiretroviral therapy suggesting that they are important in directing the immune response against HIV-1 (31). Fractalkine expression has been reported to be up-regulated in the brains of AIDS patients and may be important in HIV-1 associated dementia by regulating the trafficking of monocytes in brain parenchyma (3234). In addition, fractalkine and CX3CR1 are expressed in human neurons and glial cells (35). Our findings in HIV-infected children strongly indicate that genetic variants that alter the expression of functional CX3CR1 can profoundly influence the risk and rate of disease. Moreover, in multivariate analyses, a specific CX3CR1 genotype and haplotype strongly predicted both disease progression and CNS impairment independent of markers including CD4+ lymphocytes and plasma HIV-1 RNA load or CCR5-wt/Δ32, CCR5-59029-G/A and CX3CR1-T/M280 polymorphisms. Children with the wild-type V/V249 genotype that has been associated with greater binding to fractalkine when compared to the I/I249 genotype (28), experienced slower disease progression than children with the I/I249 genotype; however, the disease progression in V/I249 heterozygotes was similar to those with V/V249 genotype. For children with the CCR5-wt/wt genotype, we observed a significant association between the presence of the I/I249 genotype and an increased risk for impaired cognition. The same trend of increased risk was observed for children with the M/M280 genotype, albeit with a small number of children. Therefore, it would appear that genetic variants resulting in less CX3CR1 may place HIV-1 infected children at increased risk for CNS impairment.

III. Chemokine receptor genetic variants affect HIV-1 MTCT in the absence of antiretrovirals and perinatal antiretrovirals that provide partial viral suppression (Table 1 and Figure 2)

Although much progress has been made in the development and implementation of strategies designed to interrupt MTCT, many women in developing countries still have limited access to antiretrovirals. The identification of genetic markers linked with transmission can help to define risk factors associated with MTCT and provide new insights into HIV-1 pathogenesis that can help in the development of an effective HIV-1 vaccine.

MTCT occurs predominantly with macrophage-tropic (M-tropic), non-syncytium inducing viruses that use CCR5 as a co-receptor (36), and up-regulation of CCR5 expression in the placenta is associated with vertical transmission (37). A decrease in CCR5 expression could negatively affect immunologic function in newborns and alter the risk of MTCT (38). Moreover, the 32-bp CCR5 deletion is absent in most African populations (39). Hence, other genetic variants that modify the expression or function of CCR5 or other HIV-1 co-receptors or modulators of innate immunity might alter the risk of MTCT. We examined the impact of CCR5 promoter, CCR2, CX3CR1 and SDF-1 polymorphisms on the risk of HIV-1 MTCT in three sub-Saharan African cohorts of infants. The study subjects were from Malawi, South Africa and Uganda. The Malawi and South Africa cohorts consisted of antiretroviral naïve pregnant women and their infants who were involved in vitamin A intervention trials that proved unsuccessful in reducing MTCT (4042). For the Uganda cohort (HIVNET 012), mothers and their infants were randomly assigned to receive nevirapine or zidovudine (43). Nevirapine given to mother and baby significantly reduced MTCT compared to the zidovudine intervention. Overall, 21.4% of infants were determined to be HIV-1-infected, 20.2% of infants from Malawi, 24.7% from South Africa, and 19.8% from Uganda.

Our findings established a link between CCR5 promoter variants at positions 59029 and 59353 in infants and the risk for perinatal infection (44). Antiretroviral naïve infants with the 59029-A allele had a higher risk of MTCT versus G/G infants. Exposure to antiretrovirals modified the impact of these genetic variants on MTCT. Children with the CCR5-59029-A allele, which has been associated with higher expression of CCR5, were less likely to be infected when exposed to nevirapine (45). However, this same variant was associated with a higher risk for MTCT when zidovudine was given perinatally. Because CCR5-59029 and -59353 are in linkage disequilibrium, the associations between each of these polymorphisms and risk of transmission were similar. We speculate that the difference observed for MTCT between nevirapine and zidovudine exposed mother-infant pairs relates to the long half-life of nevirapine and its ability to rapidly decrease viral load. The effect of zidovudine on viral load was likely less than that of nevirapine and combined with its shorter half-life resulted in similar associations for zidovudine treated mother-infant pairs as for antiretroviral naïve infants. An alternative explanation for the effects observed with nevirapine and zidovudine on MTCT could be an unidentified differential modulation of the expression of chemokines or chemokine receptors that alter the risk for transmission or effect of other genetic factors (46, 47). A recent study reported the potential protective effects of CCR5-59029-G and -593563-T alleles against MTCT in Malawi children with lower maternal viral load (8, 48); however, this effect was lost in children with higher maternal viral load.

For the CCR5-59356-C/T promoter variant, infants with the T allele had a lower rate of transmission than infants with the C/C genotype. These findings differ from those of Kostrikis et al who reported that the presence of the T/T genotype was associated with a higher rate of MTCT in untreated mother-infant pairs in the United States (8). Although this may reflect geographic differences (Kostrikis et al evaluated mother-infant pairs from the United States while we studied the children from sub-Saharan Africa), this seems unlikely to be the explanation. Of interest, in a smaller cohort of Kenyan infants, John et al also found a trend toward decreased transmission associated with the 59656-T allele (49).

No significant effect of CX3CR1 genotypes on MTCT was observed in antiretroviral naïve mother-infant pairs. However, antiretroviral-exposed infants carrying the CX3CR1-745-A allele had a significantly higher rate of early transmission compared to infants with the G/G genotype that did not differ with nevirapine and zidovudine exposure.

Mangano et al (50) observed protective effects of CCR2-A/A genotype in Argentinean children born to HIV-1 infected mothers, while Teglas et al (51) and Brouwer et al(52) failed to find any impact of the CCR2 genotype on perinatal transmission in France and Western Kenya, respectively. In our study, the CCR2-A/A genotype was associated with higher risk of transmission versus G allele carriers suggesting a modest effect of CCR2 genotypes on MTCT in mother-infant pairs in sub-Saharan Africa.

The presence of SDF-1-G/A genotype in mothers was found to be associated with increased perinatal transmission of HIV-1 in Kenya in an earlier study (16). In our own studies, the presence of the SDF-1-A allele in infants was rare and no impact on MTCT could be identified. It is likely that if SDF-1-A alters MTCT that the relatively low frequency limits its impact on a population basis.

IV. Segmental duplications in critical CCR5 ligand genes can alter HIV-1 susceptibility and disease progression

Much data support a role for the CC chemokines CCL3 (macrophage inflammatory protein [MIP]-1α), CCL4 (MIP-1β), and CCL5 (RANTES) in HIV-1 pathogenesis. In addition to chemotaxis, CC chemokines also play an important role in T-cell activation and in directing and enhancing adaptive immune responses. In humans, CCL3 protein is encoded by two functional genes (CCL3/LD78α and CCL3L1/LD78β), occurring as two copies and as variable copy numbers, respectively, in different individuals (53). CCL3 may mediate its protective effects through its ability to enhance adaptive immune responses. Research by Gonzalez and colleagues has shown that segmental duplications containing the gene encoding CCL3L1, a potent agonist and HIV-suppressive ligand for CCR5, is associated with variable chemokine expression, and risk of acquiring HIV and rates of disease progression (54). Of note, they identified that the number of CCL3L1 copies (gene dose) within a given population may vary and the risk of infection and rate of disease progression is dependent on the relative number of gene copies compared to the mean background for a given ethnic group. Meddows-Taylor et al identified a complex association between CCL3L1 copy numbers and MTCT (55). Infants born to HIV-infected mothers with lower levels of CCL3 production were at increased risk of infection and similarly, mothers who transmitted virus had low levels of CCL3. They also suggest that “…all CCL3-L1 gene copies are not created equal…” and that some duplications may not be as functional as others. In an extension of this group’s research, Kuhn et al (46) demonstrated a copy number dependent relationship between CCL3L1 gene duplication and MTCT in a cohort from South Africa. In this study, the mean number of copies per diploid genome was 4–5 with infants having fewer copies at greatest risk of infection and those with higher numbers at least risk.

V. Strength of innate immunity genetic associations with HIV-1 disease may change with age of child

As the immune system of children matures, changes occur in how both innate and adaptive immunity respond to microorganisms. Mannose-binding lectin (MBL) protein, encoded by the MBL2 gene, is an important determinant of the innate immune response during infection (5659). MBL is an acute-phase protein that is synthesized by the liver and released into the bloodstream where it binds to the mannose residues present on some bacteria, yeast, viruses, and parasites. Binding activates the lectin complement pathway and production of C3b protein via MBL-associated serine proteases (MASPs) results in opsonization of pathogens, chemotaxis, activation of leukocytes, and direct pathogen killing (60). The MBL2 gene encodes 32 kD subunits which further associate to form high molecular weight (MW) MBL oligomers (60). MBL2 variants at the following nucleotide positions affect MBL levels: two single nucleotide polymorphisms at promoter positions -550-G/C (H/L variant) and -221-G/C (X/Y variant); one in the 5’ untranslated region +4-C/T (P/Q variant) and three genetic variants at codons 52, 54 and 57 in exon 1, at nucleotide positions 223-C/T (Arg52Cys, A/D allele), 230-G/A (Gly54Asp, A/B allele), and 239-G/A (Gly57Glu, A/C allele), respectively. MBL2 exon 1 variants result in single amino acid changes affecting oligomerization of MBL. Homozygous wt (A/A) sera contain predominantly fully functional MBL while homozygous mutant sera (any combination of B, C or D allele) contain mostly low MW MBL.

MBL deficiency has been identified as the cause of common opsonic defect of children. Additional studies have suggested that MBL plays a particularly important role in control of microorganisms in children ages 6–24 months when maternal IgG levels have waned and the infant’s own adaptive immune response is immature (56). Our studies in HIV-infected children indicate that the presence of the MBL2-O/O genotype that results in lower expression of MBL protein and impaired innate immunity is associated with more rapid development of CNS impairment in children (61). Similar to earlier studies of the association of MBL2 in HIV-1 infected adults (6264), we observed an overall trend for a more rapid disease progression in children with variant MBL2 genotypes. However most strikingly, we observed significant associations between MBL2 variants and disease progression including cognitive impairment in children below 2 years of age. These findings are consistent with a critical role for MBL in the immune response of young children (65, 66). MBL deficiency has also been associated with increased HIV-1 vertical transmission (62), which emphasizes its important role in controlling HIV-1 infection in young infants and children.

VI. HLA genotypes alter MTCT and rate of disease progression

HLA class I and class II alleles are the most polymorphic genes in humans and play a fundamental role in acquired immune responses. HLA types were among the first genetic markers found to alter the risk of becoming infected with HIV-1 and subsequent rate of disease progression (67, 68). Recently, in a case-cohort study of 572 HIV-infected children from PACTG 152 and 300, we assessed the impact of HLA class I and II alleles on HIV-related disease progression. Our preliminary findings have demonstrated that the presence of homozygous HLA-B or C alleles was associated with more rapid disease progression (unpublished, Singh and Spector). In contrast, the presence of B*27 or B*57 alleles was associated with slower disease progression which remained significant after adjustment for race, gender, age, and baseline HIV-1 log RNA, CD4+ count and percent and weight for age z-score or other genetic variants including CCR5-wt/Δ32, -59029-G/A, CCR2-wt/64I, CX3CR1-249-V/I, -280-T/M, SDF-1-180-G/A, MCP-1-G/A, MBL2-A/O, MBL2-X/Y, MBL2-P/Q, and MBL2-H/L. Additionally, the Cw-2 allele protected against disease progression and the A-24 allele was associated with more rapid CNS impairment. For HLA Class II, the presence of the DQB1*2 allele protected against HIV-1 disease progression and CNS impairment.

HLA has also been found to play an important role in MTCT. HLA concordance between a mother and her infant is associated with increased risk of transmission, while HLA discordance decreases the risk of MTCT (69, 70). Additionally, HLA class I homozygosity has been associated with more rapid disease progression (67, 68). Children homozygous or who have the same HLA class I alleles at both sites with their mothers at one of more HLA locus are at increased risk for more rapid disease progression (71).

VII. An intracellular antiviral host factor affects HIV disease

A new class of host restriction factors has been found to play an important role in restricting intracellular viral replication. APOBEC3G (Apolipoprotein B mRNA Editing Catalytic Polypeptide 3G) formerly known as CEM15, is an endogenous inhibitor of HIV-1 replication (72). During permissive infection, APOBEC3G is incorporated into nascent virus particles and mediates deoxycytidine -to-deoxyuridine deamination of minus (first)-strand reverse transcripts in target cells. This results in guanine-to-adenine hypermutation of the viral plus (sense) coding strand and is associated with premature cDNA degradation. Thus, APOBEC3G limits the spread of HIV-1 infection by packaging into the virus during assembly. The potent antiviral activity of APOBEC3G is successfully neutralized by wild-type HIV-1 through vif by mediating its polyubiquitination and rapid degradation through the proteasome (73).

The importance of APOBEC3G-mediated antiviral response against HIV-1 is underscored by the existence of APOBEC3G genetic variants influencing disease progression. An APOBEC3G variant containing a non-synonymous substitution of Arg for His at amino acid position 186 is present in African-Americans and is strongly associated with more rapid decline of CD4+ T cells and accelerated progression to AIDS (73). Our preliminary studies (unpublished, Singh and Spector) in a cohort of more than 1000 children show that while H186R variants are associated with more rapid HIV disease progression, an F119F variant is associated with moderate protection against the HIV disease progression (74).

VIII. Other host genetic factors potentially affect pediatric HIV/AIDS

Interleukin-4 (IL4) differentially regulates the two major HIV-1 coreceptors -increasing CXCR4 and decreasing CCR5 expression in primary CD4+ T-lymphocytes. Homozygosity of a ‘C’ to ‘T’ polymorphism at the 589 nucleotide position in the IL4 promoter region (IL4-589-C/T), has been correlated with increased rates of SI variant acquisition in HIV-1-infected individuals in Japan (75). We examined the impact of IL4-589-C/T polymorphisms on HIV-1 disease in children. To our surprise, we found no association between the IL4-589-T allele and disease progression in any analyses performed (76). It is possible that the IL4-589-T allele may be in linkage disequilibrium with another allele not discovered so far, which affects disease progression in HIV-1 infected individuals. To date, however, no data exist to support a role for IL4 in HIV-1 disease of children.

Recently, the monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1)-2518-G allele (associated with higher expression of MCP-1 than wild type 2518-A allele) has been shown to be associated with HIV-1–related disease (77). We hypothesized that if CCR2 (MCP-1 receptor) or MCP-1 variants were important in HIV-1 pathogenesis in children then combined CCR2-MCP-1 genotypes would be more likely to demonstrate such an effect than CCR2 alone. We found that the association of MCP-1-2518-G/G genotype with neurocognitive impairment at study entry was marginally significant (78). However, the presence of the MCP-1-2518-G allele independently or in combination with CCR2-64I allele did not impact overall progression of HIV-1 disease in children.

Several other host genetic factors affecting innate and adaptive immune responses can affect HIV-1 disease in children. These include apolipoprotein E, toll-like receptors (TLRs), DC-SIGN, IL-10, IL-6, IFN-γ, TNF-α, and CCR5 ligands MIP1α, or RANTES among others. Research is in progress examining the impact of these and other genetic variants on MTCT and HIV-1 disease progression in children.

Summary

Much research has established that host genetic factors are important determinants of HIV-1 MTCT and the rate of disease progression in children as well as adults. However, it is clear that no single genetic variant is a dominant factor in HIV-1 pathogenesis, and the risk for transmission and progressive immunosuppression depends on multiple interactions between virus and host. The judicious use of host genetics, however, has the potential to improve the care and treatment of HIV-infected pregnant women and children. In this regard, we have demonstrated that specific genetic variants are predictive of disease progression independent of a patient’s CD4+ lymphocyte count and viral load. Thus, the potential exists to develop a model of genetic variants that can be used as an adjunct to standard monitoring of T-cell subsets and plasma HIV-1 RNA to help guide when to start treatment. Although beyond the scope of this review, genetic variants in CYP genes and ABCB1 have been shown to alter the pharmacokinetics and response to specific antiretrovirals and can be used to optimize treatment of children (79, 80). Moreover, the HLA-B5701 allele is associated with the hypersensitivity reaction associated with abacavir. Screening for this allele has become standard of care for persons prior to initiating antiretroviral therapy containing abacavir (81). Perhaps most importantly studies of host genetics provide new insights into innate and adaptive immunologic mechanisms used to control HIV-1 infection. These findings can lead to improved understanding of how each arm of the immune system orchestrates an integrated, albeit insufficient, response to viral infections. It is likely that these approaches will lead to novel new strategies for vaccine development. In this regard, we believe that a successful HIV-1 vaccine will come when we are able to “educate” innate immunity such that the virus is controlled prior to establishing infection. Understanding host-virus interactions will be critical to these potential breakthroughs.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the outstanding statistical support of Terrence Fenton, Michael Hughes, Ping Ruan and Jie Chen, the technical assistance of Rodney Trout, the many clinical investigators who have allowed us to use specimens and outcome data from their clinical studies, the study participants and their families, the Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group (PACTG) and the International Maternal Perinatal Adolescent Antiretroviral Clinical Trials (IMPAACT) Network.

Financial Support: Supported by Grants from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, The International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials (IMPAACT) Network (AI-069536).

Abbreviations

APOBEC3G

Apolipoprotein B mRNA Editing Catalytic Polypeptide 3G

CCR2

Chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 2

CCR5

Chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 5

CCL3L1

Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 3-like 1

CXCR4

Chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 4

CX3CR1

Chemokine (C-X3-C motif) receptor 1

HIV-1

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1

HLA

Human leucocyte antigen

IL4

Interleukin-4

MBL

Mannose-binding lectin

MCP-1

Monocyte chemotactic protein-1

MTCT

Mother-to-child transmission

SDF-1

Stromal cell-derived factor-1

REFERENCES

  • 1.Buseyne F, Janvier G, Teglas JP, Ivanoff S, Burgard M, Bui E, Mayaux MJ, Blanche S, Rouzioux C, Riviere Y. Impact of heterozygosity for the chemokine receptor CCR5 32-bp-deleted allele on plasma virus load and CD4 T lymphocytes in perinatally human immunodeficiency virus-infected children at 8 years of age. J Infect Dis. 1998;178:1019–1023. doi: 10.1086/515660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Misrahi M, Teglas JP, N’Go N, Burgard M, Mayaux MJ, Rouzioux C, Delfraissy JF, Blanche S. CCR5 chemokine receptor variant in HIV-1 mother-to-child transmission and disease progression in children. JAMA. 1998;279:277–280. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.4.277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Shearer WT, Kalish LA, Zimmerman PA Women and Infants Transmission Study Group. CCR5 HIV-1 vertical transmission. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1998;17:180–181. doi: 10.1097/00042560-199802010-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Barroga CF, Raskino C, Fangon MC, Palumbo PE, Baker CJ, Englund JA, Spector SA. The CCR5 Delta 32 allele slows disease progression of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 infected children receiving antiretroviral treatment. J Infect Dis. 2000;182:413–419. doi: 10.1086/315704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dean M, Carrington M, Winkler C, Huttley GA, Smith MW, Allikmets R, Goedert JJ, Buchbinder SP, Vittinghoff E, Gomperts E, Donfield S, Vlahov D, Kaslow R, Saah A, Rinaldo C, Detels R, O'Brien SJ. Genetic restriction of HIV-1 infection and progression to AIDS by a deletion allele of the CKR5 structural gene. Science. 1996;273:1856–1862. doi: 10.1126/science.273.5283.1856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Liu R, Paxton WA, Choe S, Ceradini D, Martin SR, Horuk R, Macdonald ME, Stuhlmann H, Koup RA, Landau NR. Homozygous Defect in Hiv-1 Coreceptor Accounts For Resistance of Some Multiply-Exposed Individuals to Hiv-1 Infection. Cell. 1996;86:367–377. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80110-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Samson M, Libert F, Doranz BJ, Rucker J, Liesnard C, Farber CM, Saragosti S, Lapoumeroulie C, Cognaux J, Forceille C, Muyldermans G, Verhofstede C, Burtonboy G, Georges M, Imai T, Rana S, Yi Y, Smyth RJ, Collman RG, Doms RW, Vassart G, Parmentier M. Resistance to HIV-1 infection in caucasian individuals bearing mutant alleles of the CCR-5 chemokine receptor gene. Nature. 1996;382:722–725. doi: 10.1038/382722a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kostrikis LG, Neumann AU, Thomson B, Korber BT, McHardy P, Karanicolas R, Deutsch L, Huang Y, Lew JF, McIntosh K, Pollack H, Borkowsky W, Spiegel HM, Palumbo P, Oleske J, Bardeguez A, Luzuriaga K, Sullivan J, Wolinsky SM, Koup RA, Ho DD, Moore JP. A polymorphism in the regulatory region of the CC-chemokine receptor 5 gene influences perinatal transmission of Human Immunodeficiency Virus type 1 to African-American infants. J Virol. 1999;73:10264–10271. doi: 10.1128/jvi.73.12.10264-10271.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kostrikis LG, Huang YX, Moore JP, Wolinsky SM, Zhang LQ, Guo Y, Deutsch L, Phair J, Neumann AU, Ho DD. A chemokine receptor CCR2 allele delays HIV-1 disease progression and is associated with a CCR5 promoter mutation. Nat Med. 1998;4:350–353. doi: 10.1038/nm0398-350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Martin MP, Dean M, Smith MW, Winkler C, Gerrard B, Michael NL, Lee B, Doms RW, Margolick J, Buchbinder S, Goedert JJ, O'Brien TR, Hilgartner MW, Vlahov D, O'Brien SJ, Carrington M. Genetic acceleration of AIDS progerssion by a promoter variant of CCR5. Science. 1998;282:1907–1911. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5395.1907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Smith MW, Dean M, Carrington M, Winkler C, Huttley GA, Lomb DA, Goedert JJ, O'Brien TR, Jacobson LP, Kaslow R, Buchbinder S, Vittinghoff E, Vlahov D, Hoots K, Hilgartner MW, O'Brien SJ. Contrasting genetic influence of CCR2 and CCR5 variants on HIV-1 infection and disease progression. Hemophilia Growth and Development Study (HGDS), Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS), Multicenter Hemophilia Cohort Study (MHCS), San Francisco City Cohort (SFCC), ALIVE Study. Science. 1997;277:959–965. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5328.959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Winkler C, Modi W, Smith MW, Nelson GW, Wu XY, Carrington M, Dean M, Honjo T, Tashiro K, Yabe D, Buchbinder S, Vittinghoff E, Goedert JJ, Obrien TR, Jacobson LP, Detels R, Donfield S, Willoughby A, Gomperts E, Vlahov D, Phair J, Obrien SJ. Genetic restriction of AIDS pathogenesis by an SDF-1 chemokine gene variant. Science. 1998;279:389–393. doi: 10.1126/science.279.5349.389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ioannidis JP, Rosenberg PS, Goedert JJ, Ashton LJ, Benfield TL, Buchbinder SP, Coutinho RA, Eugen-Olsen J, Gallart T, Katzenstein TL, Kostrikis LG, Kuipers H, Louie LG, Mallal SA, Margolick JB, Martinez OP, Meyer L, Michael NL, Operskalski E, Pantaleo G, Rizzardi GP, Schuitemaker H, Sheppard HW, Stewart GJ, Theodorou ID, Ullum H, Vicenzi E, Vlahov D, Wilkinson D, Workman C, Zagury JF, O'Brien TR. Effects of CCR5-Delta32, CCR2-64I, and SDF-1 3'A alleles on HIV-1 disease progression: An international meta-analysis of individual-patient data. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135:782–795. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-135-9-200111060-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Meyer L, Magierowska M, Hubert JB, Theodorou I, van Rij R, Prins M, de Roda Husman AM, Coutinho R, Schuitemaker H Amsterdam Cohort Studies on AIDS. CC-chemokine receptor variants, SDF-1 polymorphism, and disease progression in 720 HIV-infected patients. SEROCO Cohort. AIDS. 1999;13:624–626. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199904010-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.van Rij RP, Husman AM, Brouwer M, Goudsmit J, Coutinho RA, Schuitemaker H. Role of CCR2 genotype in the clinical course of syncytium-inducing (SI) or non-SI human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection and in the time to conversion to SI virus variants. J Infect Dis. 1998;178:1806–1811. doi: 10.1086/314522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.John GC, Rousseau C, Dong T, Rowland-Jones S, Nduati R, Mbori-Ngacha D, Rostron T, Kreiss JK, Richardson BA, Overbaugh J. Maternal SDF1 3'A polymorphism is associated with increased perinatal human immunodeficiency virus type 1 transmission. J Virol. 2000;74:5736–5739. doi: 10.1128/jvi.74.12.5736-5739.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Singh KK, Barroga CF, Hughes MD, Chen J, Raskino C, McKinney RE, Spector SA. Genetic influence of CCR5, CCR2, and SDF1 variants on human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1)-related disease progression and neurological impairment, in children with symptomatic HIV-1 infection. J Infect Dis. 2003;188:1461–1472. doi: 10.1086/379038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bozzette SA, McCutchan JA, Spector SA, Wright B, Richman DD. A cross-sectional comparison of persons with syncytium-inducing and non-syncytium-inducing human immunodeficiency virus. J Infect Dis. 1993;168:1374–1379. doi: 10.1093/infdis/168.6.1374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Schuitemaker H, Koot M, Kootstra NA, Dercksen MW, de Goede RE, van Steenwijk RP, Lange JM, Schattenkerk JK, Miedema F, Tersmette M. Biological phenotype of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 clones at different stages of infection: progression of disease is associated with a shift from monocytotropic to T-cell-tropic virus population. J Virol. 1992;66:1354–1360. doi: 10.1128/jvi.66.3.1354-1360.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Spencer LT, Ogino MT, Dankner WM, Spector SA. Clinical significance of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 phenotypes in infected children. J Infect Dis. 1994;169:491–495. doi: 10.1093/infdis/169.3.491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tersmette M, de Goede RE, Al BJ, Winkel IN, Gruters RA, Cuypers HT, Huisman HG, Miedema F. Differential syncytium-inducing capacity of human immunodeficiency virus isolates: frequent detection of syncytium-inducing isolates in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and AIDS-related complex. J Virol. 1988;62:2026–2032. doi: 10.1128/jvi.62.6.2026-2032.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sei S, Boler AM, Nguyen GT, Stewart SK, Yang QE, Edgerly M, Wood LV, Brouwers P, Venzon DJ. Protective effect of CCR5 delta 32 heterozygosity is restricted by SDF-1 genotype in children with HIV-1 infection. AIDS. 2001;15:1343–1352. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200107270-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tresoldi E, Romiti ML, Boniotto M, Crovella S, Salvatori F, Palomba E, Pastore A, Cancrini C, de Martino M, Plebani A, Castelli G, Rossi P, Tovo PA, Amoroso A, Scarlatti G. Prognostic value of the stromal cell-derived factor 1 3'A mutation in pediatric human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. J Infect Dis. 2002;185:696–700. doi: 10.1086/339004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Singh KK, Hughes MD, Chen J, Spector SA. Genetic Polymorphisms in CX3CR1 Predict HIV-1 Disease Progression in Children Independently of CD4+ Lymphocyte Count and HIV-1 RNA Load. J Infect Dis. 2005;191:1971–1980. doi: 10.1086/430091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Imai T, Hieshima K, Haskell C, Baba M, Nagira M, Nishimura M, Kakizaki M, Takagi S, Nomiyama H, Schall TJ, Yoshie O. Identification and molecular characterization of fractalkine receptor CX3CR1, which mediates both leukocyte migration and adhesion. Cell. 1997;91:521–530. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80438-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Combadiere C, Salzwedel K, Smith ED, Tiffany HL, Berger EA, Murphy PM. Identification of CX3CR1. A chemotactic receptor for the human CX3C chemokine fractalkine and a fusion coreceptor for HIV-1. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:23799–23804. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.37.23799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Meucci O, Fatatis A, Simen AA, Miller RJ. Expression of CX3CR1 chemokine receptors on neurons and their role in neuronal survival. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:8075–8080. doi: 10.1073/pnas.090017497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Faure S, Meyer L, Costagliola D, Vaneensberghe C, Genin E, Autran B, Delfraissy JF, McDermott DH, Murphy PM, Debré P, Théodorou I, Combadière C. Rapid progression to AIDS in HIV+ individuals with a structural variant of the chemokine receptor CX3CR1. Science. 2000;287:2274–2277. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5461.2274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Faure S, Meyer L, Genin E, Pellet P, Debre P, Theodorou I, Combadiere C. Deleterious genetic influence of CX3CR1 genotypes on HIV-1 disease progression. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2003;32:335–337. doi: 10.1097/00126334-200303010-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Brumme ZL, Dong WW, Chan KJ, Hogg RS, Montaner JS, O'Shaughnessy MV, Harrigan PR. Influence of polymorphisms within the CX3CR1 and MDR-1 genes on initial antiretroviral therapy response. AIDS. 2003;17:201–208. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200301240-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Foussat A, Bouchet-Delbos L, Berrebi D, Durand-Gasselin I, Coulomb-L'Hermine A, Krzysiek R, Galanaud P, Levy Y, Emilie D. Deregulation of the expression of the fractalkine/fractalkine receptor complex in HIV-1-infected patients. Blood. 2001;98:1678–1686. doi: 10.1182/blood.v98.6.1678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Cotter R, Williams C, Ryan L, Erichsen D, Lopez A, Peng H, Zheng J. Fractalkine (CX3CL1) and brain inflammation: Implications for HIV-1-associated dementia. J Neurovirol. 2002;8:585–598. doi: 10.1080/13550280290100950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Pereira CF, Middel J, Jansen G, Verhoef J, Nottet HS. Enhanced expression of fractalkine in HIV-1 associated dementia. J Neuroimmunol. 2001;115:168–175. doi: 10.1016/s0165-5728(01)00262-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.van der Meer P, Ulrich AM, Gonzalez-Scarano F, Lavi E. Immunohistochemical analysis of CCR2, CCR3, CCR5, and CXCR4 in the human brain: potential mechanisms for HIV dementia. Exp Mol Pathol. 2000;69:192–201. doi: 10.1006/exmp.2000.2336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hatori K, Nagai A, Heisel R, Ryu JK, Kim SU. Fractalkine and fractalkine receptors in human neurons and glial cells. J Neurosci Res. 2002;69:418–426. doi: 10.1002/jnr.10304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ometto L, Zanchetta M, Mainardi M, De Salvo GL, Garcia-Rodriguez MC, Gray L, Newell ML, Chieco-Bianchi L, De Rossi A. Co-receptor usage of HIV-1 primary isolates, viral burden, and CCR5 genotype in mother-to-child HIV-1 transmission. AIDS. 2000;14:1721–1729. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200008180-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Behbahani H, Popek E, Garcia P, Andersson J, Spetz AL, Landay A, Flener Z, Patterson BK. Up-regulation of CCR5 expression in the placenta is associated with human immunodeficiency virus-1 vertical transmission. Am J Pathol. 2000;157:1811–1818. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64819-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ank N, Petersen K, Malmgaard L, Mogensen SC, Paludan SR. Age-dependent role for CCR5 in antiviral host defense against herpes simplex virus type 2. J Virol. 2005;79:9831–9841. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.15.9831-9841.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Martinson JJ, Hong L, Karanicolas R, Moore JP, Kostrikis LG. Global distribution of the CCR2-64I/CCR5-59653T HIV-1 disease-protective haplotype. AIDS. 2000;14:483–489. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200003310-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Semba RD, Miotti PG, Chiphangwi JD, Dallabetta G, Yang LP, Saah A, Hoover D. Maternal vitamin A deficiency and infant mortality in Malawi. J Trop Pediatr. 1998;44:232–234. doi: 10.1093/tropej/44.4.232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Coutsoudis A, Pillay K, Kuhn L, Spooner E, Tsai WY, Coovadia HM. Method of feeding and transmission of HIV-1 from mothers to children by 15 months of age: prospective cohort study from Durban, South Africa. AIDS. 2001;15:379–387. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200102160-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Coutsoudis A, Pillay K, Spooner E, Kuhn L, Coovadia HM South African Vitamin A Study Group. Randomized trial testing the effect of vitamin A supplementation on pregnancy outcomes and early mother-to-child HIV-1 transmission in Durban, South Africa. AIDS. 1999;13:1517–1524. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199908200-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Guay LA, Musoke P, Fleming T, Bagenda D, Allen M, Nakabiito C, Sherman J, Bakaki P, Ducar C, Deseyve M, Emel L, Mirochnick M, Fowler MG, Mofenson L, Miotti P, Dransfield K, Bray D, Mmiro F, Jackson JB. Intrapartum and neonatal single-dose nevirapine compared with zidovudine for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1 in Kampala, Uganda: HIVNET 012 randomised trial. Lancet. 1999;354:795–802. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)80008-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Singh KK, Hughes MD, Chen J, Phiri K, Rousseau C, Kuhn L, Coutsoudis A, Jackson JB, Guay LA, Musoke P, Mmiro F, Semba RD, Spector SA. Associations of Chemokine Receptor Polymorphisms With HIV-1 Mother-to-Child Transmission in Sub-Saharan Africa: Possible Modulation of Genetic Effects by Antiretrovirals. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2008;49:259–265. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e318186eaa4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Salkowitz JR, Bruse SE, Meyerson H, Valdez H, Mosier DE, Harding CV, Zimmerman PA, Lederman MM. CCR5 promoter polymorphism determines macrophage CCR5 density and magnitude of HIV-1 propagation in vitro. Clin Immunol. 2003;108:234–240. doi: 10.1016/s1521-6616(03)00147-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kuhn L, Schramm DB, Donninger S, Meddows-Taylor S, Coovadia AH, Sherman GG, Gray GE, Tiemessen CT. African infants' CCL3 gene copies influence perinatal HIV transmission in the absence of maternal nevirapine. AIDS. 2007;21:1753–1761. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3282ba553a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Schramm DB, Kuhn L, Gray GE, Tiemessen CT. In vivo effects of HIV-1 exposure in the presence and absence of single-dose nevirapine on cellular plasma activation markers of infants born to HIV-1-seropositive mothers. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006;42:545–553. doi: 10.1097/01.qai.0000225009.30698.ce. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Pedersen BR, Kamwendo D, Blood M, Mwapasa V, Molyneux M, North K, Rogerson SJ, Zimmerman P, Meshnick SR. CCR5 haplotypes and mother-to-child HIV transmission in Malawi. PLoS One. 2007;2:e838. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.John GC, Bird T, Overbaugh J, Nduati R, Mbori-Ngacha D, Rostron T, Dong T, Kostrikis L, Richardson B, Rowland-Jones SL. CCR5 promoter polymorphisms in a Kenyan perinatal human immunodeficiency virus type 1 cohort: association with increased 2-year maternal mortality. J Infect Dis. 2001;184:89–92. doi: 10.1086/321006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Mangano A, Prada F, Roldan A, Picchio G, Bologna R, Sen L. Distribution of CCR-5 delta32 allele in Argentinian children at risk of HIV-1 infection: its role in vertical transmission. AIDS. 1998;12:109–110. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Teglas JP, N'Go N, Burgard M, Mayaux MJ, Rouzioux C, Blanche S, Delfraissy JF, Misrahi M French pediatric HIV infection study group. CCR2B-64I chemokine receptor allele and mother-to-child HIV-1 transmission or disease progression in children. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 1999;22:267–271. doi: 10.1097/00126334-199911010-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Brouwer KC, Yang C, Parekh S, Mirel LB, Shi YP, Otieno J, Lal AA, Lal RB. Effect of CCR2 chemokine receptor polymorphism on HIV type 1 mother-to-child transmission and child survival in Western Kenya. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2005;21:358–362. doi: 10.1089/aid.2005.21.358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Modi WS. CCL3L1 and CCL4L1 chemokine genes are located in a segmental duplication at chromosome 17q12. Genomics. 2004;83:735–738. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2003.09.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Gonzalez E, Kulkarni H, Bolivar H, Mangano A, Sanchez R, Catano G, Nibbs RJ, Freedman BI, Quinones MP, Bamshad MJ, Murthy KK, Rovin BH, Bradley W, Clark RA, Anderson SA, O'Connell RJ, Agan BK, Ahuja SS, Bologna R, Sen L, Dolan MJ, Ahuja SK. The influence of CCL3L1 gene-containing segmental duplications on HIV-1/AIDS susceptibility. Science. 2005;307:1434–1440. doi: 10.1126/science.1101160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Meddows-Taylor S, Donninger SL, Paximadis M, Schramm DB, Anthony FS, Gray GE, Kuhn L, Tiemessen CT. Reduced ability of newborns to produce CCL3 is associated with increased susceptibility to perinatal human immunodeficiency virus 1 transmission. J Gen Virol. 2006;87:2055–2065. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.81709-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Dommett RM, Klein N, Turner MW. Mannose-binding lectin in innate immunity: past, present and future. Tissue Antigens. 2006;68:193–209. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0039.2006.00649.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Garred P, Larsen F, Madsen HO, Koch C. Mannose-binding lectin deficiency--revisited. Mol Immunol. 2003;40:73–84. doi: 10.1016/s0161-5890(03)00104-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kilpatrick DC. Mannan-binding lectin: clinical significance and applications. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2002;1572:401–413. doi: 10.1016/s0304-4165(02)00321-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Turner MW. Mannose-binding lectin (MBL) in health and disease. Immunobiology. 1998;199:327–339. doi: 10.1016/S0171-2985(98)80037-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Thiel S, Vorup-Jensen T, Stover CM, Schwaeble W, Laursen SB, Poulsen K, Willis AC, Eggleton P, Hansen S, Holmskov U, Reid KB, Jensenius JC. A second serine protease associated with mannan-binding lectin that activates complement. Nature. 1997;386:506–510. doi: 10.1038/386506a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Singh KK, Lieser A, Ruan PK, Fenton T, Spector SA. An age-dependent association of mannose-binding lectin-2 genetic variants on HIV-1-related disease in children. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;122:173–180. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.05.025. 180.e171–172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Boniotto M, Crovella S, Pirulli D, Scarlatti G, Spano A, Vatta L, Zezlina S, Tovo PA, Palomba E, Amoroso A. Polymorphisms in the MBL2 promoter correlated with risk of HIV-1 vertical transmission and AIDS progression. Genes Immun. 2000;1:346–348. doi: 10.1038/sj.gene.6363685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Dzwonek A, Novelli V, Bajaj-Elliott M, Turner M, Clapson M, Klein N. Mannose-binding lectin in susceptibility and progression of HIV-1 infection in children. Antivir Ther. 2006;11:499–505. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Garred P, Madsen HO, Balslev U, Hofmann B, Pedersen C, Gerstoft J, Svejgaard A. Susceptibility to HIV infection and progression of AIDS in relation to variant alleles of mannose-binding lectin. Lancet. 1997;349:236–240. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)08440-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Faber J, Schuessler T, Finn A, Murdoch C, Zenz W, Habermehl P, Meyer CU, Zabel BU, Schmitt H, Zepp F, Knuf M. Age-dependent association of human mannose-binding lectin mutations with susceptibility to invasive meningococcal disease in childhood. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2007;26:243–246. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000256751.76218.7c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Koch A, Melbye M, Sorensen P, Homoe P, Madsen HO, Molbak K, Hansen CH, Andersen LH, Hahn GW, Garred P. Acute respiratory tract infections and mannose-binding lectin insufficiency during early childhood. JAMA. 2001;285:1316–1321. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.10.1316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.O'Brien SJ, Gao X, Carrington M. HLA and AIDS: a cautionary tale. Trends Mol Med. 2001;7:379–381. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4914(01)02131-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Carrington M, O'Brien SJ. The influence of HLA genotype on AIDS. Annu Rev Med. 2003;54:535–551. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.54.101601.152346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Mackelprang RD, John-Stewart G, Carrington M, Richardson B, Rowland-Jones S, Gao X, Mbori-Ngacha D, Mabuka J, Lohman-Payne B, Farquhar C. Maternal HLA homozygosity and mother-child HLA concordance increase the risk of vertical transmission of HIV-1. J Infect Dis. 2008;197:1156–1161. doi: 10.1086/529528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Polycarpou A, Ntais C, Korber BT, Elrich HA, Winchester R, Krogstad P, Wolinsky S, Rostron T, Rowland-Jones SL, Ammann AJ, Ioannidis JP. Association between maternal and infant class I and II HLA alleles and of their concordance with the risk of perinatal HIV type 1 transmission. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2002;18:741–746. doi: 10.1089/08892220260139477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Kuhn L, Abrams EJ, Palumbo P, Bulterys M, Aga R, Louie L, Hodge T. Maternal versus paternal inheritance of HLA class I alleles among HIV-infected children: consequences for clinical disease progression. AIDS. 2004;18:1281–1289. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200406180-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Simon JH, Gaddis NC, Fouchier RA, Malim MH. Evidence for a newly discovered cellular anti-HIV-1 phenotype. Nat Med. 1998;4:1397–1400. doi: 10.1038/3987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Sheehy AM, Gaddis NC, Malim MH. The antiretroviral enzyme APOBEC3G is degraded by the proteasome in response to HIV-1 Vif. Nat Med. 2003;9:1404–1407. doi: 10.1038/nm945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.An P, Bleiber G, Duggal P, Nelson G, May M, Mangeat B, Alobwede I, Trono D, Vlahov D, Donfield S, Goedert JJ, Phair J, Buchbinder S, O'Brien SJ, Telenti A, Winkler CA. APOBEC3G genetic variants and their influence on the progression to AIDS. J Virol. 2004;78:11070–11076. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.20.11070-11076.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Nakayama EE, Meyer L, Iwamoto A, Persoz A, Nagai Y, Rouzioux C, Delfraissy JF, Debre P, McIlroy D, Theodorou I, Shioda T. Protective effect of interleukin-4 -589T polymorphism on human immunodeficiency virus type 1 disease progression: relationship with virus load. J Infect Dis. 2002;185:1183–1186. doi: 10.1086/339825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Singh KK, Hughes MD, Chen J, Spector SA. Lack of Protective Effects of Interleukin-4-589-C/T Polymorphism against HIV-1-Related Disease Progression and Central Nervous System Impairment, in Children. J Infect Dis. 2004;189:587–592. doi: 10.1086/381460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Gonzalez E, Rovin BH, Sen L, Cooke G, Dhanda R, Mummidi S, Kulkarni H, Bamshad MJ, Telles V, Anderson SA, Walter EA, Stephan KT, Deucher M, Mangano A, Bologna R, Ahuja SS, Dolan MJ, Ahuja SK. HIV-1 infection and AIDS dementia are influenced by a mutant MCP-1 allele linked to increased monocyte infiltration of tissues and MCP-1 levels. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:13795–13800. doi: 10.1073/pnas.202357499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Singh KK, Hughes MD, Chen J, Spector SA. Impact of MCP-1-2518-G allele on the HIV-1 disease of children in the United States. AIDS. 2006;20:475–478. doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000200540.09856.58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Saitoh A, Sarles E, Capparelli E, Aweeka F, Kovacs A, Burchett SK, Wiznia A, Nachman S, Fenton T, Spector SA. CYP2B6 genetic variants are associated with nevirapine pharmacokinetics and clinical response in HIV-1-infected children. AIDS. 2007;21:2191–2199. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3282ef9695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Saitoh A, Singh KK, Powell CA, Fenton T, Fletcher CV, Brundage R, Starr S, Spector SA. An MDR1-3435 variant is associated with higher plasma nelfinavir levels and more rapid virologic response in HIV-1 infected children. AIDS. 2005;19:371–380. doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000161766.13782.2f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Mallal S, Phillips E, Carosi G, Molina JM, Workman C, Tomazic J, Jagel-Guedes E, Rugina S, Kozyrev O, Cid JF, Hay P, Nolan D, Hughes S, Hughes A, Ryan S, Fitch N, Thorborn D, Benbow A. HLA-B*5701 screening for hypersensitivity to abacavir. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:568–579. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0706135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Blanche S. HIV in infants and children: transmission and progression. In: HIV: advances in research and therapy. Cliggot Communications Greenwich, Connecticut. 1994;4:9–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Spector SA. Mother-to-infant transmission of HIV-1: the placenta fights back. J Clin Invest. 2001;107:267–269. doi: 10.1172/JCI12094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES