Abstract
In addition to mediating cell adhesion, many cell adhesion molecules act as tumor suppressors. These proteins are capable of restricting cell growth mainly through contact inhibition. Alterations of these cell adhesion molecules are a common event in cancer. The resulting loss of cell-cell and/or cell-extracellular matrix adhesion promotes cell growth as well as tumor dissemination. Therefore, it is conventionally accepted that cell adhesion molecules that function as tumor suppressors are also involved in limiting tumor cell migration. Paradoxically, in 2005, we identified an immunoglobulin superfamily cell adhesion molecule hepaCAM that is able to suppress cancer cell growth and yet induce migration. Almost concurrently, CEACAM1 was verified to co-function as a tumor suppressor and invasion promoter. To date, the reason and mechanism responsible for this exceptional phenomenon remain unclear. Nevertheless, the emergence of these intriguing cell adhesion molecules with conflicting roles may open a new chapter to the biological significance of cell adhesion molecules.
Key words: hepaCAM, cell adhesion molecules, tumor suppressor, migration, E-cadherin, CADM1, integrin α7, CEACAM1
It is well known that many cell adhesion molecules function as tumor suppressors (reviewed in ref. 1). These molecules exert their tumor suppressive effect mainly through cell-adhesion-mediated contact inhibition. Cell adhesion molecules allow cells to communicate with one another or to the extracellular environment by mediating cell-cell or cell-extracellular matrix (ECM) interactions (reviewed in refs. 2 and 3). Broadly, these proteins can be classified into five families including immunoglobulin superfamily, integrins, cadherins, selectins and CD44. Apart from participating in the development and maintenance of tissue architecture, cell adhesion molecules serve as cell surface receptors critical for capturing, integrating and transmitting signals from the extracellular milieu to the cell interior (reviewed in refs. 2 and 3). These signaling events are vital for the regulation of a wide variety of cellular functions including embryogenesis, immune and inflammatory responses, tissue repair, cell migration, differentiation, proliferation and apoptosis. Alterations of these cell adhesion molecules are a common event in cancer (reviewed in refs. 1, 2, 4 and 5). The disrupted cell-cell or cell-ECM adhesion significantly contributes to uncontrolled cell proliferation and progressive distortion of normal tissue architecture. More importantly, changes in cell adhesion molecules play a causal role in tumor dissemination. Loss of cell adhesion contacts allows malignant cells to detach and to escape from the primary mass. Gaining a more motile and invasive phenotype, these cells break down the ECM and eventually invade and metastasize to distal organs.
Based on the above understanding, it is conventionally accepted that cell adhesion molecules with tumor suppressor activity, when expressed in cancer cells, are able to exert inhibitory effect on cell motility. The ability of cells in migration/motility is a prerequisite for cancer invasion and metastasis (reviewed in refs. 1 and 5). Indeed, a number of cell adhesion molecule-tumor suppressors have been reported to be capable of reducing cell migration. The most classical example is E-cadherin, a calcium-dependent cell adhesion molecule. E-cadherin is expressed exclusively in epithelial cells and its expression is commonly suppressed in tumors of epithelial origins. The cytoplasmic domain of E-cadherin interacts with catenins to establish an intracellular linkage with the actin cytoskeleton (reviewed in ref. 6). The assembly of E-cadherin with the cytoskeleton via catenins at the sites of adherens junctions is important for the stabilization of cell-cell adhesions. Disruption of E-cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion, due to loss of expression or function of E-cadherin and/or catenins, is assocated with tumor development and progression (reviewed in ref. 7). Forced expression of E-cadherin in several cancer cell lines not only slows down cell growth8,9 but also significantly reduces the invasiveness of the cells.10,11 On the other hand, inhibition of E-cadherin by function-blocking antibodies and antisense RNA restores the invasiveness in non-invasive transformed cells.11 Furthermore, using a transgenic mouse model of pancreatic beta-cell carcinogenesis, it has been demonstrated that E-cadherin-mediated cell adhesion is important in preventing the transition from well differentiated adenoma to invasive carcinoma.12
Cell adhesion molecule 1 (CADM1), another example, has also been implicated in cancer progression. CADM1 is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily and mediates cell-cell adhesion.13 The molecule associates with the actin cytoskeleton via the differentially expressed in adenocarcinoma of the lung (DAL1) protein; and the formation of CADM1-DAL1 complex is dependent on the integrity of actin cytoskeleton.14 Inactivation of the CADM1 and/or DAL1 gene usually through methylation has been reported in diverse human cancers.15,16 A paper by Ito et al. showed that restoration of CADM1 expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cells not only suppresses cell growth, but also retards cell motility and invasion.16
In contrast to E-cadherin and CADM1, integrin α7 is a cell-ECM adhesion molecule which also possesses tumor suppressor activity. Ren et al. showed that integrin α7 gene is mutated in several human malignances; and the mutations are associated with an increase in cancer recurrence.17 Forced expression of integrin α7 in integrin α7-deficient leiomyosarcoma cells results in decreased colony formation and slower cell motility. Conversely, knockdown of integrin α7 in lung cancer cells expressing wild-type integrin α7 increases the colony number and cell motility rate. In addition, the researchers revealed that mice bearing xenograft tumors overexpressing integrin α7 have reduced tumor size with no obvious metastasis.
In 2005, we first reported the identification of a cell adhesion molecule belonging to the immunoglobulin superfamily, designated as hepaCAM.18 To date, we have shown that the gene is frequently downregulated in a variety of human cancers.18,19 Re-expression of hepaCAM in the hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2 cells18 and breast cancer MCF7 cells19 inhibits colony formation and retards cell proliferation. In addition, expression of hepaCAM in MCF7 cells results in cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase and cellular senescence. Concurrently, the expression of several senescence-associated proteins including p53, p21 and p27 is enhanced. Moreover, downregulation of p53 by p53-specific small interfering RNA in cells expressing hepaCAM clearly reduces p21 without changing p27 and alleviates senescence, indicating that hepaCAM induces senescence through a p53/p21-dependent pathway.19 Together, the data suggest that hepaCAM is a tumor suppressor. Interestingly, the expression of hepaCAM in both HepG2 and MCF7 cells stimulates both cell-ECM adhesion and cell migration.18,20,21 The function of hepaCAM as a tumor suppressor in cell migration is contradictory to other cell adhesion molecule-tumor suppressors. Noteworthily, hepaCAM-mediated cell motility is evidenced by its direct interaction with the actin cytoskeleton.21
Evidences are currently emerging to support the contradictory roles of cell adhesion molecules that both inhibit cell growth and promote cell motility when restored in cancer cells. In addition to hepaCAM, the immunoglobulin superfamily carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 1 (CEACAM1) is implicated to function as a tumor suppressor and a metastasis promoter. The characteristics and functions of CEACAM1 have been demonstrated in individual reports. CEACAM1 is frequently downregulated or dysregulated in multiple human tumors,22–25 and is capable of suppressing cell growth and inducing apoptosis.26–28 Ebrahimnejad et al. demonstrated that exogenous expression of CEACAM1 enhances melanoma cell invasion and migration; and this enhanced motility can be reverted by anti-CEACAM antibodies.29 The ability of CEACAM to co-stimulate tumor suppression and invasion was finally established by Liu et al. in restricting thyroid cancer growth but promoting invasiveness.30 Introduction of CEACAM1 into CEACAM1-deficient thyroid cancer cells results in G1/S phase cell cycle arrest accompanied by elevated p21 expression and diminished Rb phosphorylation. Overexpression of CEACAM1 also increases cell-ECM adhesion and promotes cell migration and tumor invasiveness. In xenografted mice, CEACAM1 expression results in reduced tumor growth but increased tumor invasiveness. Conversely, silencing of endogenous CEACAM1 accelerates tumor growth and suppresses invasiveness.30
It is an exciting issue to address why a cell adhesion molecule is able to suppress tumor growth yet promote tumor progression. Could there be a molecular switch that controls the functions of the gene between a tumor suppressor and a migration promoter in cancer or are the functions executed simultaneously? The expression level, the extracellular cues as well as the interacting partners of the cell adhesion molecules may likely play a critical role in regulating its functions. The question is under what circumstances these factors come into play. To answer all these questions, and maybe more, on the intriguing findings of these proteins, more extensive and intensive experimentation is required. Nevertheless, it is obvious that the emergence of these cell adhesion molecules that function in a contradictory manner opens a new chapter to the biological significance of cell adhesion molecules.
Abbreviations
- ECM
extracellular matrix
- CADM1
cell adhesion molecule 1
- DAL1
differentially expressed in adenocarcinoma of the lung
- CEACAM1
carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 1
Footnotes
Previously published online as a Cell Adhesion & Migration E-publication: http://www.landesbioscience.com/journals/celladhesion/article/9246
References
- 1.Okegawa T, Li Y, Pong RC, Hsieh JT. Cell adhesion proteins as tumor suppressors. J Urol. 2002;167:1836–1843. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Nair KS, Naidoo R, Chetty R. Expression of cell adhesion molecules in oesophageal carcinoma and its prognostic value. J Clin Pathol. 2005;58:343–351. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2004.018036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Freemont AJ, Hoyland JA. Cell adhesion molecules. Clin Mol Pathol. 1996;49:321–330. doi: 10.1136/mp.49.6.m321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Fawcett J, Harris AL. Cell adhesion molecules and cancer. Curr Opin Oncol. 1992;4:142–148. doi: 10.1097/00001622-199202000-00019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Keleg S, Büchler P, Ludwig R, Büchler MW, Friess H. Invasion and metastasis in pancreatic cancer. Mol Cancer. 2003;2:14. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-2-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Takeichi M. Cadherin cell adhesion receptors as a morphogenetic regulator. Science. 1991;251:1451–1455. doi: 10.1126/science.2006419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pecina-Slaus N. Tumor suppressor gene e-cadherin and its role in normal and malignant cells. Cancer Cell Int. 2003;3:17. doi: 10.1186/1475-2867-3-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Watabe M, Nagafuchi A, Tsukita S, Takeichi M. Induction of polarized cell-cell association and retardation of growth by activation of the e-cadherin-catenin adhesion system in a dispersed carcinoma line. J Cell Biol. 1994;127:247–256. doi: 10.1083/jcb.127.1.247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.St Croix B, Sheehan C, Rak JW, Flørenes VA, Slingerland JM, Kerbel RS. E-cadherin-dependent growth suppression is mediated by the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27(kip1) J Cell Biol. 1998;142:557–571. doi: 10.1083/jcb.142.2.557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Frixen UH, Behrens J, Sachs M, Eberle G, Voss B, Warda A, et al. E-cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion prevents invasiveness of human carcinoma cells. Cell Biol. 1991;113:173–185. doi: 10.1083/jcb.113.1.173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Vleminckx K, Vakaet L, Jr, Mareel M, Fiers W, van Roy F. Genetic manipulation of e-cadherin expression by epithelial tumor cells reveals an invasion suppressor role. Cell. 1991;66:107–119. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90143-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Perl AK, Wilgenbus P, Dahl U, Semb H, Christofori G. A causal role for e-cadherin in the transition from adenoma to carcinoma. Nature. 1998;392:190–193. doi: 10.1038/32433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Masuda M, Yageta M, Fukuhara H, Kuramochi M, Maruyama T, Nomoto A, et al. The tumor suppressor protein tslc1 is involved in cell-cell adhesion. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:31014–31019. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M203620200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yageta M, Kuramochi M, Masuda M, Fukami T, Fukuhara H, Maruyama T, et al. Direct association of tslc1 and dal-1, two distinct tumor suppressor proteins in lung cancer. Cancer Res. 2002;62:5129–5133. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Heller G, Geradts J, Ziegler B, Newsham I, Filipits M, Markis-Ritzinger EM, et al. Downregulation of tslc1 and dal-1 expression occurs frequently in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;103:283–291. doi: 10.1007/s10549-006-9377-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ito T, Shimada Y, Hashimoto Y, Kaganoi J, Kan T, Watanabe G, et al. Involvement of tslc1 in progression of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2003;63:6320–6326. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ren B, Yu YP, Tseng GC, Wu C, Chen K, Rao UN, et al. Analysis of integrin alpha7 mutations in prostate cancer, liver cancer, glioblastoma multiforme and leiomyosarcoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:868–880. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djk199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Moh MC, Lee LH, Shen S. Cloning and characterization of hepacam, a novel ig-like cell adhesion molecule suppressed in human hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2005;42:833–841. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.01.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Moh MC, Zhang T, Lee LH, Shen S. Expression of hepacam is downregulated in cancers and induces senescence-like growth arrest via a p53/p21-dependent pathway in human breast cancer cells. Carcinogenesis. 2008;29:2298–2305. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgn226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Moh MC, Zhang C, Luo C, Lee LH, Shen S. Structural and functional analyses of a novel ig-like cell adhesion molecule, hepacam, in the human breast carcinoma mcf7 cells. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:27366–27374. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M500852200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Moh MC, Tian Q, Zhang T, Lee LH, Shen S. The immunoglobulin-like cell adhesion molecule hepacam modulates cell adhesion and motility through direct interaction with the actin cytoskeleton. J Cell Physiol. 2009;219:382–391. doi: 10.1002/jcp.21685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kleinerman DI, Troncoso P, Lin SH, Pisters LL, Sherwood ER, Brooks T, et al. Consistent expression of an epithelial cell adhesion molecule (c-cam) during human prostate development and loss of expression in prostate cancer: implication as a tumor suppressor. Cancer Res. 1995;55:1215–1220. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Shinozuka K, Uzawa K, Fushimi K, Yamano Y, Shiiba M, Bukawa H, et al. Downregulation of carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 1 in oral squamous cell carcinoma: correlation with tumor progression and poor prognosis. Oncology. 2009;76:387–397. doi: 10.1159/000215580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Riethdorf L, Lisboa BW, Henkel U, Naumann M, Wagener C, Löning T. Differential expression of ceacam1 (bgp), a cell adhesion molecule of the carcinoembryonic antigen family, in benign, premalignant and malignant lesions of the human mammary gland. J Histochem Cytochem. 1997;45:957–963. doi: 10.1177/002215549704500705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Neumaier M, Paululat S, Chan A, Matthaes P, Wagener C. Biliary glycoprotein, a potential human cell adhesion molecule, is downregulated in colorectal carcinomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:10744–10748. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.22.10744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kunath T, Ordoñez-Garcia C, Turbide C, Beauchemin N. Inhibition of colonic tumor cell growth by biliary glycoprotein. Oncogene. 1995;11:2375–2382. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Luo W, Wood CG, Earley K, Hung MC, Lin SH. Suppression of tumorigenicity of breast cancer cells by an epithelial cell adhesion molecule (c-cam1): the adhesion and growth suppression are mediated by different domains. Oncogene. 1997;14:1697–1704. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1200999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Nittka S, Böhm C, Zentgraf H, Neumaier M. The ceacam1-mediated apoptosis pathway is activated by cea and triggers dual cleavage of ceacam1. Oncogene. 2008;27:3721–3728. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1211033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ebrahimnejad A, Streichert T, Nollau P, Horst AK, Wagener C, Bamberger AM, et al. Ceacam1 enhances invasion and migration of melanocytic and melanoma cells. Am J Pathol. 2004;165:1781–1787. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63433-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Liu W, Wei W, Winer D, Bamberger AM, Bamberger C, Wagener C, et al. Ceacam1 impedes thyroid cancer growth but promotes invasiveness: a putative mechanism for early metastases. Oncogene. 2007;26:2747–2758. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]