Skip to main content
PMC home page
BMC Cancer logoLink to BMC Cancer
. 2009 Dec 17;9:446. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-9-446

Hyperoxia increases the uptake of 5-fluorouracil in mammary tumors independently of changes in interstitial fluid pressure and tumor stroma

Ingrid Moen 1,2, Karl J Tronstad 1, Odd Kolmannskog 1, Gerd S Salvesen 1, Rolf K Reed 1, Linda EB Stuhr 1,✉
PMCID: PMC2805681  PMID: 20017908

Abstract

Background

Hypoxia is associated with increased resistance to chemo- and radiation-therapy. Hyperoxic treatment (hyperbaric oxygen) has previously been shown to potentiate the effect of some forms of chemotherapy, and this has been ascribed to enhanced cytotoxicity or neovascularisation. The aim of this study was to elucidate whether hyperoxia also enhances any actual uptake of 5FU (5-fluorouracil) into the tumor tissue and if this can be explained by changes in the interstitium and extracellular matrix.

Methods

One group of tumor bearing rats was exposed to repeated hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) treatment (2 bar, pO2 = 2 bar, 4 exposures à 90 min), whereas one group was exposed to one single identical HBO treatment. Animals housed under normal atmosphere (1 bar, pO2 = 0.2 bar) served as controls. Three doses of 5FU were tested for dose response. Uptake of [3H]-5FU in the tumor was assessed, with special reference to factors that might have contributed, such as interstitial fluid pressure (Pif), collagen content, oxygen stress (measured as malondialdehyd levels), lymphatics and transcapillary transport in the tumors.

Results

The uptake of the cytostatic agent increases immediately after a single HBO treatment (more than 50%), but not 24 hours after the last repeated HBO treatment. Thus, the uptake is most likely related to the transient increase in oxygenation in the tumor tissue. Factors like tumor Pif and collagen content, which decreased significantly in the tumor interstitium after repeated HBO treatment, was without effect on the drug uptake.

Conclusion

We showed that hyperoxia increases the uptake of [3H]-5FU in DMBA-induced mammary tumors per se, independently of changes in Pif, oxygen stress, collagen fibril density, or transendothelial transport alone. The mechanism by which such an uptake occur is still not elucidated, but it is clearly stimulated by elevated pO2.

Background

A tumor is comprised of cancer cells as well as stromal cells (fibroblasts, immune cells) that are embedded in an extracellular matrix (ECM) and nourished by vasculature. Because of irregular and tortuous tumor blood vessels with impaired blood flow and high proliferation rate, tumors have large hypoxic areas, especially in the central parts. It is now widely accepted that hypoxia induces tumor growth and enhances both radiation- and chemo-resistance of cancer cells [1].

Inefficiency of chemotherapy can partly be explained by development of multidrug resistance to different chemotherapeutic agents. However, the causes of hypoxia-mediated resistance are multifactorial. Some chemotherapeutic drugs require oxygen to generate free oxygen radicals that in turn induce cytotoxicity. Genetic and proteomic changes may have substantial effect, by altering proliferation kinetics, cell cycle position, inhibiting apoptosis and regulate angiogenesis and cellular metabolism [2]. However, drug resistance can also be caused by the inefficient transport of the anticancer drug into the tumor tissue. Solid tumors have a pathologically increased interstitial fluid pressure (Pif) and a dense ECM that make transport of chemotherapeutic agents difficult [3-7]. Increased Pif leads to decreased transcapillary transport, and thereby hinders efficient uptake of chemotherapy [8], while the fibrotic nature of the dense ECM in solid tumors have been shown to impede transport of molecules in the tumor interstitium, and thereby decrease the effect of cytostatic drugs [9-11]. Since Pif can be lowered and the structure of the tumor interstitium can be altered, this could have the potential to enhance the efficiency of drug-based treatment of solid malignancies.

As hypoxia reduces the response of chemotherapeutic agents, we aimed to study the effect of enhanced oxygenation on drug-uptake in mammary tumors, by using hyperbaric oxygen (HBO). HBO increases oxygen tension and oxygen delivery to tissues independent of haemoglobin. This pO2 elevation has been shown to last for up to 60 min post HBO treatment [12]. Because of this, HBO has previously been used to enhance the pO2 in hypoxic tumor tissue, to potentiate the effect of radio- and photo-therapy in both clinical and preclinical trials and also the effect of some forms of chemotherapy like doxorubicin, alkylating agents and 5FU [13-16]. This effect has been ascribed as increased cytotoxicity of the tumor cells to the chemotherapeutic drug in vitro [16,17] and enhanced neovascularisation in vivo [18]. However, recent studies have shown reduced vascularisation after HBO treatment in vivo [19-21].

Therefore, the aim of the present study was to study if there is an effect of either a single (1) or repeated (4) treatments (each 90 min) of 2 bar pure oxygen on the uptake of radioactively labelled 5FU in the tumor tissue per se, and whether this is related to elevated pO2and micro-environmental factors like Pif, collagen fibrils, transcapillary transport and oxygen stress. We would then be able to conclude that the HBO enhancement of chemotherapeutic effects, previously shown in the literature, is not only due to an enhanced sensitisation of the tumor cells.

Methods

Animals and tumor model

Female Sprague-Dawley rats were used. Mammary tumors (adenocarcinomas) were induced by dimetyl-α-benzantracene (DMBA) dissolved in olive oil and given to the rat by gavage at the age of 7 weeks at a dose of 16 mg (Møllegård, Denmark). The experiments were performed when the rats were 13-15 weeks old, having reached a bodyweight of approximately 250 g and developed one to three tumors along the mammary crest. Thus, n is equal to number of tumors, not the number of rats in these experiments. This was done to minimize the number of animals used. As tumors are very heterogenous, this was not considered a problem. We did not perform a power analysis prior to the experiments. The number of animals in each group is determined based on previous experience with rat experiments. However, this is always a general compromise between experimental accuracy and at the same time keeping the number of animals as low as possible. The previous variance in animal experiments has resulted in the minimum number of animals to n = 5. The animals were randomly allocated to the treatments groups, and none were excluded from the treatment procedure. Malondialdehyde and hydoxyproline experiments were performed blinded. As the main investigator performed both the HBO treatment and the rest of the follow-up experiments, blinding was difficult to accomplish. All the experiments were performed in accordance with recommendations of the Norwegian State Commission for Laboratory Animals and were approved by the local ethical committee.

Hyperbaric hyperbaric chamber

A 30 L pressure chamber with an inner diameter of 25 cm, and an inner length of 65 cm was used. The chamber was supplied with pure O2, and the oxygen concentration (%) was monitored continuously by an oxygen meter (NUI, Bergen, Norway). After reaching 100% O2 within approximately 10 min, the pressure was raised over a period of approximately 3 min to 2 bar. The 2 bar pure oxygen atmosphere was maintained for a period of 90 min. To maintain >97% O2 atmosphere at all times, the chamber was flushed with pure oxygen for 3-5 min every 10-30 min depending on the number of animals in the chamber. The rats were then decompressed over a period of 10 min.

Experimental groups and treatment design

The different experimental groups and their treatment details are given in Table 1. The repeated HBO treated rats were exposed to HBO on day 1, 4, 7 and 10, and the follow-up experiments were performed on day 11. The choice of this treatment protocol is due to a previous study [20], showing that 4 HBO treatments gave maximal growth-inhibitory effect. The single HBO treated group was only exposed to HBO on day 1 and measurements performed immediately after the exposure.

Table 1.

The experimental groups.

Experimental groups Gas Ambient pressure pO2 Number of exposures Exposure time
Control air 1 bar 0.2 - -
Repeated HBO treatment O2 2 bar 2.0 4 90 min
Single HBO treatment O2 2 bar 2.0 1 90 min
Open in a new tab

Dose response of 5FU

We tested 3 different doses of 5FU. Original dose (1.5 mg/kg), 1/3 (0.5 mg/kg) dose and 3× (4.5 mg/kg) dose 5FU was injected intraperitonally and tumor size was measured by a calliper on day 1, 4, 7 and 11, and estimated according to the formula: V = π/6 (a2·b), where 'a' denotes the shortest transversal diameter and 'b' the longest transversal diameter. Growth was calculated as growth change compared to day 1 (100%).

Microdialysis

To determine the uptake of radioactively labelled 5FU ([3H]-5FU) (Nycomed Amersham, Buckinghamshire, UK) into the tumor tissue, microdialysis technique [22] was used, as modified in our laboratory [23]. After anaesthesia, the femoral vein was cannulated for injection of [3H]-5FU. One microdialysis probe (CMA/20, Microdialysis AB, Stockholm, Sweden) was placed in the jugular vein and one in the tumor. Both probes were connected to a pump (CMA-100, Microdialysis AB, Stockholm, Sweden) and the catheters were perfused with saline at a rate of 1 μl/min. The catheter and probes were left to stabilize and equilibrate for 60 min before sampling of dialysate. Sampling of dialysate from both tumor and plasma started immediately after injection of 0.2 ml 0.37 Mbq [3H]-5FU and fractions were collected every 10 min for a total of 70 min. The area under the curve (AUC) for the plasma and tumor was calculated as the product of counts per 10 min (cpm) for a total measurement period of 70 min. Transport of [3H]-5FU was expressed as AUC tumor divided by AUC plasma.

An additional, single HBO exposure group was performed to elucidate if the generally known enhanced effect of cytostatic agents in combination with HBO is due to the high pO2 during and immediately after HBO exposure. The rats were therefore operated before the single 90 min HBO exposure, and left to stabilize for 15 min post exposure. 0.2 ml 0.37 MBq [3H]-5FU was injected into the femoral catheter, and dialysate was sampled for the next 70 min, analogue to the standard microdialysis experiments.

Measurement of interstitial fluid pressure (Pif)

Pif was measured using the wick-in-needle (WIN) technique [7,24]. Briefly, a standard 23-gauge needle, with a 2-4 mm long sidehole, filled with nylon floss and saline was inserted into the central part of the tumor and connected to a transducer dome through a PE-50 catheter. The fluid communication between the interstitium and the measuring system was confirmed by compression and decompression of the catheter (clamping). This caused a transient rise and fall in the pressure. A measurement was accepted when the pressure returned to pre-clamp value (± 1 mmHg).

Determination of collagen content in the tumors

Hydroxyproline (to estimate collagen content) was determined in acid hydrolysates of the tumor tissue by a colometric method adapted from Woessner et al. [25].

Oxygen stress measured by Malondialdehyd (MDA)

To evaluate oxidative stress on lipids and membranes (the status of oxidative damage) we measured the lipid peroxidation product MDA, in controls and HBO treated tumors. MDA was analysed by a spectrophotometric assay according to the manufacturer's protocol (Northwest Life Science Specialties, LCC, Vancouver). The level of thiobarbituric reactive substances (TBARS) was assessed in tissue homogenates (10% w/v prepared from frozen samples). As recommended for complex samples, the 3rd-derivative spectra (400-700 nm) were obtained, and MDA levels were calculated based on the peak value around 510-520 nm

Volume calculations by the dilution principle

Extracellular volume (ECV) and plasma volume (PV) in tumor and skin was measured by radioactively labelled isotopes using the dilution principle as previously described [26]. Total tissue water (TTW) was calculated as: (wet weight-dry weight)/(dry weight). Samples were dried at 50°C until constant weight. The distribution volumes for 51Cr-EDTA (Institute of Energy Technology, Kjeller, Norway) and 125I-labeled human serum albumin (125I-HSA) (Institute of Energy Technology, Kjeller, Norway), measuring ECV and PV respectively, were calculated as plasma equivalent volumes, i.e. counts per min per mg of tissue divided by counts per min per ml of plasma. Both isotopes were given after functional nephrectomy by bilateral ligation of the renal pedicles via flank incision. 51Cr-EDTA (0.7 MBq) was injected into the jugular catheter and left to circulate for 85 min before injecting 0.05 MBq 125I-HSA. Blood samples were taken 5 min later, by heart puncture.

Immunohistochemistry

The animals were sacrificed with saturated KCl during anaesthesia and the tumors were immediately dissected out and put into liquid N2 and then stored in -80°C.

Frozen tumor sections (20 μm) were used for studying lymph-vessel morphology. The sections were stained with an antibody against lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor-1 (LYVE-1) with the Avidin-Biotin Complex (ABC) method, using a commercially available kit (Vector Vectastatin Elite ABC Staining Kit, Vector Laboratories Inc). Diaminobenzidine (DAB) was used as a chromogen to visualize the lymph-vessels. Finally, the sections were counterstained with Richardsons dye. The sections were examined using a Nikon light microscope (THP Eclipse E600, Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) and the images were captured with a Nikon Digital Camera (DXM 1200F, Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).

Statistics

All data were tested for normality prior to the choice of statistical analysis. Results were analysed statistically using two-way analysis with unpaired t-test comparing results from the groups. Paired t-test was used when comparing results within the same group of animals. Non-parametric Mann-Whitney test was used for the Pif measurements, while ANOVA with Tukey post test was used to compare the results from the microdialysis. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Dose response of 5FU

To examine if different doses of the chemotherapeutic drug might influence the effect on tumor growth, dose response of 3 different doses were tested. However, there was no significant difference in tumor growth inhibition between the three different doses of 5FU (Figure 1). (n = 5 for each group).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

The effect of three different doses of 5-fluorouracil (5FU) on tumor growth, original dose (1.5 mg/kg), 1/3 (0.5 mg/kg) dose and 3× (4.5 mg/kg) dose. Tumor growth is measured as % of initial volume. Mean ± SD.

Uptake of [3H]-5FU

Microdialysis was used to examine if oxygenation of the tumor after HBO treatment influenced the direct uptake of the chemotherapeutic drug into the tumor tissue. Microdialysis showed no increase in uptake of [3H]-5FU into the tumor tissue 24 hours after the last repeated HBO treatment (n = 8) compared to control (n = 7). However, immediately after the single HBO treatment (n = 5) there was a significant increase in uptake (p < 0.05) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Uptake of [3H]-5-fluorouracil (5FU), interstitial fluid pressure (Pif), collagen content and malondialdehyd (MDA) levels in controls and after repeated or single hyperbaric oxygen exposure (HBO).

Control Repeated HBO Single HBO
Uptake of [3H]-5FU
(AUC tumor/AUC plasma)		 0.17 ± 0.12
(n = 7)		 0.20 ± 0.11
(n = 8)		 0.42 ± 0.21 *
(n = 5)
Pif
(mmHg)		 5.5 ± 2.6
(n = 9)		 2.3 ± 2.7*
(n = 11)		 2.5 ± 2.9*
(n = 17)
%collagen of dry weight 11.6 ± 5.0
(n = 6)		 5.0 ± 1.1*
(n = 4)
MDA levels
(nmol/mg prot)		 0.09 ± 0.01
(n = 5)		 0.15 ± 0.11
(n = 5)		 0.09 ± 0.02
(n = 5)
Open in a new tab

Mean ± SD.

* p < 0.05 vs control

Hyperoxia lowers interstitial fluid pressure (Pif)

As elevated Pif has been proposed to inhibit the transport and effect of chemotherapy, we wanted to elucidate if this was the case also for DMBA induced mammary tumors. The Pif is usually high in solid tumors, reaching 5.5 ± 0.9 mmHg in the control tumors (n = 9) (Table 2). However, the average Pif after both single (n = 17) and repeated HBO (n = 13) treatment was significantly reduced (p < 0.05) compared to control.

Hyperoxia influences collagen fibrils

A dense collagen network has been proposed to hinder efficient transport of chemotherapeutic drugs. Therefore we have elucidated collagen content in both control and HBO treated tumors. The amount of hydroxyproline was significantly lower in the HBO treated tumors compared to controls, indicating a corresponding decrease in collagen content (Table 2).

Hyperoxia and oxygen radicals

As hyperoxia might induce elevated oxygen radical levels, it was desirable to measure if this could have influenced the effect of chemotherapy after HBO treatment. Measurements of MDA-levels showed no significant differences in oxygen radicals compared to control (n = 5), neither in the acute (n = 5) nor the repeated (n = 5) HBO treated group (Table 2). The higher mean value in the repeated group is due to one diverging value. Discarding this value would give an identical mean as to the two other groups.

Extracellular fluid volume, plasma volume and total tissue water

Since Pif in the HBO treated tumors was lowered, we assumed that this could influence the fluid distribution. However, there was no statistically significant difference in ECV, PV or TTW in either the tumor or skin tissue between control (n = 9) and repeated HBO treated rats (n = 8) (Table 3).

Table 3.

The extracellular volume (ECV), plasma volume (PV) and total tissue water (TTW) in skin and tumor in control and after repeated hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) exposure.

ECV
(ml/g dry weight)		 PV
(ml/g dry weight)		 TTW
(ml/g dry weight)
Skin Tumor Skin Tumor Skin Tumor
Control
(n = 9)		 0.55 ± 0.12 1.00 ± 0.27 0.007 ± 0.004 0.07 ± 0.04 1.44 ± 0.09 3.73 ± 0.45
HBO
(n = 8)		 0.50 ± 0.18 0.85 ± 0.47 0.004 ± 0.003 0.06 ± 0.03 1.45 ± 0.2 4.05 ± 0.9
Open in a new tab

Means ± SD.

Hyperoxia influenced tumor lymphatics

As the amount and functionality of lymph vessels influence both Pif, fluid distribution and possibly the transport of chemotherapy, we stained lymph vessels to elucidate possible changes after HBO. Staining with LYVE-1 showed continuous lymphatic vessels in the mammary control tumors, located in the connective tissue close to larger blood vessels. After HBO treatment, however, the lymphatic vessels are disintegrated and no longer continuous (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Lymph vessels stained with LYVE-1 in two different control tumors (A and C) and hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) treated tumors (B and D). The staining was performed concomitant in the two groups. Note disintegration of lymphatics after HBO treatment, and seemingly anatomically normal lymphatics in untreated control tumors.

Discussion

Stuhr et al. [14] demonstrated increased effect of the commonly used cytostatic drug 5FU in DMBA-induced mammary tumors, when injected intraperitoneally immediately before each HBO treatment. Dose-response experiments in this study showed no statistical difference between 1/3×, 1× and 3× dose of 5FU (Figure 1), indicating that it must be the HBO treatment that potentiated the effect of the chemotherapeutic drug. We therefore wanted to investigate if there is an effect of either a single or repeated treatment of 2 bar pure oxygen on the uptake of radioactively labelled 5FU in the tumor tissue per se. We have concluded that the potentiation of the chemotherapeutic effect after HBO is not only due to an enhanced cytotoxicity of the tumor cells, as has been previously postulated in the literature [15,27,28], but also due to an direct increase in uptake of the chemotherapeutic drug.

Successful delivery of systemically administered cytostatic agents to the tumor tissue requires that the drug must reach the target cells in optimal dosage and in addition be effective in the tumor microenvironment. After a molecule has been moved out of the blood vessels and into the interstitium, further transport is heavily influenced by the organization and conductivity, and thereby the composition of the interstitium. Several investigators have shown increased uptake of cytostatic agents after decreased tumor Pif [8,29-32]. In a recent review, Heldin et al. [8] suggest that increased Pif contributes to a decreased capillary transport in tumors, to hinder efficient uptake of drugs into the tumor tissue. Additionally, the composition and organisation of the ECM, cell-cell interactions, and the tumor structure also affect drug penetration [33]. Eikenes et al. [11] proposed that the structure of the ECM is the single most important factor for macromolecule uptake. In accordance with this, Netti et al. [9], found an unexpected correspondence between transport resistance and the mechanical stiffness of the ECM, with an extended collagen network in the more penetration-resistant tumors. Also, others have shown that tumors with high collagen density and small interstitial space have lower drug penetration [34,35]. Furthermore, increased blood flow and blood vessel permeability are factors that are important in drug-uptake [36]. Thus, we chose especially to investigate the relation between uptake of the cytostatic drug, transendothelial transport, tumor Pif and the collagen fibril network.

We found a significant reduction in tumor Pif after both acute and repeated HBO treatment, and expected that this would be reflected in an increased uptake of [3H]-5FU after both treatments. This is, however, not the fact in our study, where the uptake of [3H]-5FU was significantly increased after single HBO treatment, but not after the repeated HBO treatment. The cpm-ratio between tumor and plasma was stable over the 70 min sampling-period during microdialysis for the single HBO treatment, indicating a constant condition determining the uptake. The increased uptake of the drug into the tumor tissue, after single HBO exposure is most likely influenced by increased pO2. Previous studies reported enhanced pO2 for up to one hour after HBO treatment [12,37]. Since the repeated HBO treated animals were measured 24 hours after the last HBO treatment, the pO2 is normalized and any effect of pO2 will not be measurable. In the single HBO experiments, however, the pO2 is still high. The repeated HBO treatment probably induces more long-term changes in the tumor tissue that influences Pif. The reduction in collagen may be involved in the reduction of Pif over time. Stromal fibroblasts are able to exert tension on the collagen microfibrillar network through the collagen binding integrins [38]. When the amount of collagen fibrils is reduced, as shown with hydroxyproline quantification, this effect would not be as pronounced, and the Pif might be reduced. Thus, it seems like repeated HBO treatment have reduced tumor Pif by reducing collagen content and density, most likely by enhancing breakdown of collagen.

Tumor vessels are hyperpermeable due to up-regulation of vascular mediators such as nitric oxide, bradykinin as well as anatomic defects like large gap junctions between adjacent cells and lack of pericytes [36,39]. An explanation for the lack of uptake of [3H]-5FU in the repeated HBO treated tumors, might be the proposed mechanism by Lee et al. [40] of "normalization" of the abnormal structure and function of the tumor vasculature after anti-angiogenic treatment. We have previously shown that repeated HBO induces an anti-angiogenic effect in the DMBA induced tumors [19,21]. Lee et al. [40] suggested that it is the quality of the vascular organization and not just the quantity of the vessels that determines the vessel function, and that the loss of endothelial cells would reduce the tortuousity of vessels or eliminate them altogether. Later, several preclinical and clinical studies [41,42] have shown that the "normalized" vasculature after anti-angiogenic therapy had less leaky and tortuous vessels, with more normal basement membranes and better pericyte coverage, and that these structural changes were accompanied by "normalization" of the tumor microenvironment. This modification in vascular architecture would decrease vascular permeability and reduce flow resistance and hence lower both mean venous pressure and Pif [8]. Experimental studies have demonstrated that anti-angiogenic therapy can decrease the overall distribution of large macromolecules such as antibodies for instance [43,44] and decrease blood perfusion [45]. Thus, since we have previously shown that HBO has an anti-angiogenic effect on DMBA induced tumors after repeated HBO treatment [19], this will together with a possible reduced capillary permeability, impede transendothelial transport of [3H]-5FU, even though Pif is lowered.

In normal tissue, the interstitial fluid volume is kept fairly constant by several mechanisms [46], such as lymph flow and adjustment of pressures acting across the capillary wall [47]. LYVE-1 surprisingly shows continuous lymph vessels in our control tumors, but dissolved lymph vessels after repeated HBO treatment. However, Fukumura et al. [48] stated that even though the structures with lymphatic endothelial marker are present in tumors, they probably do not transport fluid or macromolecules. This, together with the observed lowering of tumor Pif after repeated HBO treatment, should lead to an increase in ECV. Nevertheless, ECV, PV and TTW did not change in tumors after repeated HBO treatment compared to control, indicating that neither the lowered Pif nor the disintegrated lymphatics after HBO contribute to the unchanged ECV found in the present study. As already mentioned, the possible "normalization" of the tumor vasculature, after repeated HBO treatment, is expected to normalize capillary permeability, and thereby prevent any increase in ECV, even though Pif is decreased.

Reactive oxygen species and oxidative stress are considered to be important in several aspects of malignancies, both in tumor development as well as therapeutic strategies such as radiotherapy [49]. Since changes in oxygen concentration may affect the production of its reactive derivatives in the tumor, it is relevant to suggest that antitumor effects of HBO may be due to oxidative stress. Furthermore, as stated in the introduction, some chemotherapeutic drugs require oxygen to generate free radicals that induce cytotoxicity. However, our measurements of lipid peroixidation (MDA) did not indicate any significant effect on the oxidative status of the tumor tissue. Oxidative stress is therefore not likely to be involved in the potentiated effect of 5FU after HBO.

Most solid tumors depend on increased rates of glycolysis to satisfy their energy demand [50]. This leads to decreased pH in the tumor microenvironment due to excessive lactate secretion. Hyperoxic treatment enhances oxygenation of the tumor tissue, and may therefore promote a reversion from the anaerobic metabolism back to non-tumorigentic, oxidative metabolism and thereby increased pH [21]. A less acidic microenvironment may therefore have a positive effect on the cytotoxicity of chemotherapy. However, although increased cytotoxicity has previously been postulated to be the main determinant of the enhanced effect of chemotherapy after HBO treatment in addition to enhanced neovascularisation, the present study has shown that it is also due to an active uptake of the drug into the tumor tissue.

In conclusion, we showed that hyperoxia increases the uptake of [3H]-5FU in DMBA-induced mammary tumors, independently of changes in Pif, collagen fibril density, or transendothelial transport alone, as one could expect from the literature. The mechanism by which such an uptake occurs is clearly stimulated by elevated pO2, but still not elucidated.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

IM carried out the HBO treatments, the microdialysis, the Pifmeasurements, the volume experiments and the LYVE staining, in addition to drafting the manuscript. KJT performed the MDA experiments. OK carried out the hydroxyproline measurements. GS performed the dose response experiments and assisted on the microdialysis and volume experiments. RKR and LS participated in the study design, interpretation of data and manuscript drafting. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Pre-publication history

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/9/446/prepub

Contributor Information

Ingrid Moen, Email: ingrid.moen@biomed.uib.no.

Karl J Tronstad, Email: karl.tronstad@biomed.uib.no.

Odd Kolmannskog, Email: odd.kolmannskog@helse-bergen.no.

Gerd S Salvesen, Email: gerd.salvesen@biomed.uib.no.

Rolf K Reed, Email: rolf.reed@biomed.uib.no.

Linda EB Stuhr, Email: linda.stuhr@biomed.uib.no.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from Helse Vest (Grants 911370), Edel and Ole Stakvold's foundation and The Norwegian cancer society. Ingrid Strand and Åse Rye Eriksen are gratefully acknowledged for technical assistance.

References

  1. Hoogsteen IJ, Marres HA, Kogel AJ van der, Kaanders JH. The hypoxic tumour microenvironment, patient selection and hypoxia-modifying treatments. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2007;19(6):385–396. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2007.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Harrison L, Blackwell K. Hypoxia and anemia:factors in decreased sensitivity to radiation therapy and chemotherapy? Oncologist. 2004;9(Suppl 5):31–40. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.9-90005-31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Jain RK. Transport of molecules in the tumor interstitium: a review. Cancer Research. 1987;47(12):3039–3051. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Less JR, Posner MC, Boucher Y, Borochovitz D, Wolmark N, Jain RK. Interstitial hypertension in human breast and colorectal tumors. Cancer Research. 1992;52:6371–6374. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Nathanson SD, Nelson L. Interstitial fluid pressure in breast cancer, benign breast conditions, and breast parenchyma. Ann Surg Oncol. 1994;1(4):333–338. doi: 10.1007/BF03187139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gullino PM, Clark SH, Grantham FH. The interstitial fluid of solid tumors. Cancer Research. 1964;24:780–797. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wiig H, Tveit E, Hultborn R, Reed RK, Weiss L. Interstitial fluid pressure in DMBA-induced rat mammary tumours. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1982;42(2):159–164. doi: 10.3109/00365518209168067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Heldin NE, Rubin K, Pietras K, Östman A. High interstitial fluid pressure-an obstacle in cancer therapy. Nat Rev. 2004;4:806–813. doi: 10.1038/nrc1456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Netti PA, Berk DA, Swartz MA, Grodzinsky AJ, Jain RK. Role of extracellular matrix assembly in interstitial transport in solid tumors. Cancer Research. 2000;60:2497–2503. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Znati CA, Rosenstein M, McKee TD, Brown E, Turner D, Bloomer WD, Watkins S, Jain RK, Boucher Y. Irradiation reduces interstitial fluid transport and increases the collagen content in tumors. Clin Cancer Research. 2003;9:5508–5513. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Eikenes L, Bruland ØS, Brekken C, de Lange Davies C. Collagenase increases the transcapillary pressure gradient and improves the uptake and distribution of monoclonal antibodies in human osteosarcoma xenografts. Caner Research. 2004;64:4768–4773. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-1472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kinoshita Y, Kohshi K, Kunugita N, Tosaki T, Yokota A. Preservation of tumor oxygen after hyperbaric oxygenation monotored by magnetic resonance imaging. Brit J of Cancer. 2000;82:88–92. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.1999.0882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Takiguchi N, Saito N, Nunomura M, Kouda K, Oda K, Furuyama N, Nakajima N. Use of 5-FU plus hyperbaric oxygen for treating malignant tumors: evaluation of antitumor effect and measurement of 5-FU in induvidual organs. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2001;47(1):11–14. doi: 10.1007/s002800000190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Stuhr LE, Iversen VV, Straume O, Maehle BO, Reed RK. Hyperbaric oxygen alone or combined with 5-FU attenuates growth of DMBA-induced rat mammary tumors. Cancer Lett. 2004;210(1):35–40. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2004.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Al-Waili NS, Betler G, Beale J, Hamilton RW, Lee BY, Lucas P. Hyperbaric oxygen and malignancies: a potential role in radiotherapy, chemotherapy, tumor surgery and phototherapy. Med Sci Monit. 2005;11(9):RA279–289. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Petre PM, Baciewicz FA Jr, Tigan S, Spears JR. Hyperbaric oxygen as a chemotherapy adjuvant in the treatment of metastatic lung tumors in a rat model. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;125(1):85–95. doi: 10.1067/mtc.2003.90. discussion 95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Teicher BA, Crawford JM, Holden SA, Cathcart KN. Effects of various oxygenation conditions on the enhancement by Fluosol-DA of melphalan antitumor activity. Cancer Res. 1987;47(19):5036–5041. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Alagoz T, Buller RE, Anderson B, Terrell KL, Squatrito RC, Niemann TH, Tatman DJ, Jebson P. Evaluation of hyperbaric oxygen as a chemosensitizer in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer in xenografts in mice. Cancer. 1995;75(9):2313–2322. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19950501)75:9&#x0003c;2313::AID-CNCR2820750921&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Raa A, Stansberg C, Steen VM, Bjerkvig R, Reed RK, Stuhr L. Hyperoxia retards growth and induces apoptosis and loss of glands and blood vessels in DMBA-induced rat mammary tumors. BMC Cancer. 2007;7(1) doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-7-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Stuhr LB, Raa A, Øyan AM, Kalland KH, Sakariassen PO, Petersen K, Bjerkvig R, Reed RK. Hyperoxia retards growth and induces apoptosis, changes in vascular density and gene expression in transplanted gliomas in nude rats. J Neurooncology. 2007;85(2):191–202. doi: 10.1007/s11060-007-9407-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Moen I, Oyan AM, Kalland KH, Tronstad KJ, Akslen LA, Chekenya M, Sakariassen PO, Reed RK, Stuhr LE. Hyperoxic treatment induces mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition in a rat adenocarcinoma model. PLoS One. 2009;4(7):e6381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Schmelz M, Luz O, Averbeck B, Bickel A. Plasma extravasation and neuropeptide release in human skin as measured by intradermal microdialysis. Neuroscience Letters. 1997;230:117–120. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3940(97)00494-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Iversen VV, Brønstad A, Gjerde E-AB, Reed RK. Continuous measurements of plasma protein extravasation with microdialysis after various infalmmatory challenges in rat and mouse skin. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004;286:H108–H112. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00542.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Fadnes HO, Reed RK, Aukland K. Interstitial fluid pressure in rats measured with a modified wick technique. Microvascular Research. 1977;14(27):27–36. doi: 10.1016/0026-2862(77)90138-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Woessner JR. The determination of hydroxyproline in tissue and protein samples containing small proportions of this imino acid. Archives of biochemistry and biophysics. 1961;93:440–447. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(61)90291-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Reed RK, Lepsøe S, Wiig H. Interstitial exclusion of albumin in rat dermis and subcutis in over- and dehydration. Am J Physiol. 1989;257:H1819–1827. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1989.257.6.H1819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kalns J, Krock L, Piepmeier E Jr. The effect of hyperbaric oxygen on growth and chemosensitivity of metastatic prostate cancer. Anticancer Res. 1998;18(1A):363–367. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Daruwalla J, Christophi C. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for malignancy: A review. World Journal of Surgery. 2006;30(12):2112–2131. doi: 10.1007/s00268-006-0190-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Emerich DF, Dean RL, Snodgrass P, Lafreniere D, Agostino M, Wiens T, Xiong H, Hasler B, Marsh J, Pink M, Kim BS, Perdomo B, Bartus RT. Bradykinin modulation of tumor vasculature: II. activation of nitric oxide and phospholipase A2/prostaglandin signaling pathways synergistically modifies vascular physiology and morphology to enhance delivery of chemotherapeutic agents to tumors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2001;296(2):632–641. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Pietras K, Rubin K, Sjoblom T, Buchdunger E, Sjoquist M, Heldin CH, Ostman A. Inhibition of PDGF receptor signaling in tumor stroma enhances antitumor effect of chemotherapy. Cancer Research. 2002;62(19):5476–5484. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Salnikov AV, Iversen VV, Koisti M, Sundberg C, Johansson L, Stuhr LB, Sjoquist M, Ahlstrom H, Reed RK, Rubin K, Lammerts E, Roswall P, Gotwals PJ, Koteliansky VE, Heldin NE. Lowering of tumor interstitial fluid pressure specifically augments efficacy of chemotherapy. Interference with TGF-beta1 and -beta3 in tumor stroma lowers tumor interstitial fluid pressure independently of growth in experimental carcinoma. Faseb J. 2003;17(12):1756–1758. doi: 10.1096/fj.02-1201fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Stuhr LEB, Salnikov AV, Iversen VV, Salvesen G, Rubin K, Reed RK. High-dose, short-term, anti-inflammatory treatment with dexamethasone reduces growth and augments the effects of 5-fluorouracil on dimethyl-alpha-benzanthracene-induced mammary tumors in rats. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2006;66:477–486. doi: 10.1080/00365510600788332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Davies E, Clarke C, Hopkins A. Malignant cerebral glioma-I: Survival, disability, and morbidity after radiotherapy. BMJ. 1996;313:1507–1512. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7071.1507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kuh HJ, Jang SH, Wientjes MG, Weaver JR, Au JL. Determinants of paclitaxel penetration and accumulation in human solid tumor. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999;290(2):871–880. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Au JL, Jang SH, Wientjes MG. Clinical aspects of drug delivery to tumors. J Control Release. 2002;78(1-3):81–95. doi: 10.1016/S0168-3659(01)00488-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Jain RK. Delivery of molecular and cellular medicine to solid tumors. J Cont Release. 1998;53(1-3):49–67. doi: 10.1016/S0168-3659(97)00237-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Brizel DM, Lin S, Johnson JL, Brooks J, Dewhirst MW, Piantadosi CA. The mechanisms by which hyperbaric oxygen and carbogen improve tumor oxygenation. Brit J of Cancer. 1995;72(5):1120–1124. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1995.474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Reed RK, Berg A, Gjerde EA, Rubin K. Control of interstitial fluid pressure: role of beta1-integrins. Semin Nephrol. 2001;21(3):222–230. doi: 10.1053/snep.2001.21646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Jain RK. Normalizing tumor vasculature with anti-angiogenic therapy: A new paradigm for combination therapy. Nat Med. 2001;7(9):987–989. doi: 10.1038/nm0901-987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Lee C-G, Heijn M, di Tomaso E, Griffon-Etienne G, Ancukiewich M, Koike C, Park KR, Ferrara N, Jain RK, Suit HD, Boucher Y. Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor treatment augments tumor radiation responce under normoxic or hypoxic conditions. Cancer Research. 2000;60:5565–5570. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Jain RK, Tong RT, Munn LL. Effect of vascular normalization by antiangiogenetic therapy on interstitial hypertension, peritumor edema, lymphatic metastasis: insights from a mathematical model. Cancer Research. 2007;67(6):2729–2735. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Tong RT, Boucher Y, Kozin SV, Winkler F, Hicklin DJ, Jain RK. Vascular normalization by vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 blockade induces a pressure gradient across the vasculature and improves drug penetration in tumors. Cancer Research. 2004;1(64):3731–3736. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Weis SM, Cheresh DA. Pathophysiological consequences of VEGF-induced vascular permeability. Nature. 2005;437(7058):497–504. doi: 10.1038/nature03987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Nakahara T, Norberg SM, Shalinsky DR, Hu-Lowe DD, McDonald DM. Effect of inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor signaling on distribution of extravasated antibodies in tumors. Cancer Res. 2006;66(3):1434–1445. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Willett CG, Kozin SV, Duda DG, di Tomaso E, Kozak KR, Boucher Y, Jain RK. Combined Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-targeted therapy and radiotherapy for rectal cancer: Theory and clinical practice. Seminars in oncology. 2006;33:S35–S40. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2006.08.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Aukland K, Reed RK. Interstitial-lymphatic mechanisms in the control of extracellular fluid volume. The American physiological society. 1993;73(1):1–78. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1993.73.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Wiig H, Rubin K, Reed RK, Tveit E, Hultborn R, Weiss L. New and active role of the interstitium in control of interstitial fluid pressure: potential therapeutic consequences. Evaluation of methodologies for measurement of interstitial fluid pressure (Pif): physiological implications of recent Pi data. Interstitial fluid pressure in DMBA-induced rat mammary tumours. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2003;47(2):111–121. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2003.00050.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Fukumura D, Jain RK. Tumor microvasculature and microenvironment: Targets for anti-angiogenesis and normalization. Microvascular Research. 2007. in press Article. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  49. Halliwell B. Oxidative stress and cancer: have we moved forward? Biochem J. 2007;401(1):1–11. doi: 10.1042/BJ20061131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Gatenby RA, Gillies RJ. Why do cancers have high aerobic glycolysis? Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4(11):891–899. doi: 10.1038/nrc1478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMC Cancer are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES