Abstract
Echocardiographic strain and strain-rate imaging (deformation imaging) is a new non-invasive method for assessment of myocardial function. Due to its ability to differentiate between active and passive movement of myocardial segments, to quantify intraventricular dyssynchrony and to evaluate components of myocardial function, such as longitudinal myocardial shortening, that are not visually assessable, it allows comprehensive assessment of myocardial function and the spectrum of potential clinical applications is very wide. The high sensitivity of both tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) derived and two dimensional (2D) speckle tracking derived myocardial deformation (strain and strain rate) data for the early detection of myocardial dysfunction recommend these new non-invasive diagnostic methods for extensive clinical use. In addition to early detection and quantification of myocardial dysfunction of different etiologies, assessment of myocardial viability, detection of acute allograft rejection and early detection of allograft vasculopathy after heart transplantation, strain and strain rate data are helpful for therapeutic decisions and also useful for follow-up evaluations of therapeutic results in cardiology and cardiac surgery. Strain and strain rate data also provide valuable prognostic information, especially prediction of future reverse remodelling after left ventricular restoration surgery or after cardiac resynchronization therapy and prediction of short and median-term outcome without transplantation or ventricular assist device implantation of patients referred for heart transplantation.
The Review explains the fundamental concepts of deformation imaging, describes in a comparative manner the two major deformation imaging methods (TDI-derived and speckle tracking 2D-strain derived) and discusses the clinical applicability of these new echocardiographic tools, which recently have become a subject of great interest for clinicians.
Keywords: Strain imaging, echocardiography, myocardial contraction, diagnosis, prognosis.
INTRODUCTION
Although conventional echocardiography is considered to be reliable for ventricular wall motion analysis and assessment of regional myocardial function, the visual estimation of wall motion is very subjective and therefore highly operator dependent. It also has high interobserver and intraobserver variability and allows only limited evaluation of radial displacement and deformation, without the possibility of assessing myocardial shortening and twisting [1,2].
During recent years, velocity imaging, displacement imaging and deformation imaging (strain and strain-rate imaging) have emerged as valuable tools for more comprehensive and reliable echocardiographic assessment of myocardial function [2-11].
BASIC CONCEPTS AND TERMINOLOGY
For a better understanding of different echocardiographic modalities available for the assessment of myocardial contractile function, it is important to make a distinction between myocardial wall motion and wall deformation [3-7]. Whereas velocity and displacement characterize wall motion, strain and strain-rate describe wall deformation. Over time a moving object will change its position (displacement) but does not undergo deformation if all its parts move with the same velocity. If, however, different parts of the object move with different velocities, the object will undergo deformation and will change its shape. Thus wall motion measurements (displacement and velocity) cannot differentiate between active and passive movement of a myocardial segment, whereas deformation analyses (strain and strain-rate imaging) allow discrimination between active and passive myocardial tissue movement.
The term “strain”, which in everyday language can mean “stretching”, is used in echocardiography to describe “deformation” [12].
However the concept of strain is complex. Thus for a one-dimensional (1D) object (i.e. an infinitesimally thin bar) the only possible deformation is lengthening or shortening and the linear strain (amount of deformation) can be defined by the formula:
where ε = strain, L0 = baseline length and L = instantaneous lengths at the time of measurement.
When the length of the object is known not only before and after deformation, but also during the deformation process the instantaneous strain can be defined as:
where L(t) is the length at the time instance t and L(t0) ≡ L0. The instantaneous deformation is thus expressed relative to the initial length (Lagrangian strain) [12]. The deformation can also be expressed relative to the length at a previous time instance (natural strain) and in this definition of instantaneous strain the reference value is not constant over the time but changes during the deformation process [12]. For small deformations the Lagrangian and natural strain are approximately equal whereas for large deformations which can occur during ventricular contraction and relaxation the difference between Lagrangian and natural strain are relevant. For myocardial strain measurements it appears more appropriate to measure the natural strain because the measured values are less dependent on the definition of the initial length L0 [12].
For two-dimensional (2D) objects, the deformation is not limited to lengthening or shortening in one direction. A 2D object can lengthen or shorten along the x or y axis (normal strain) and can also distort (shear strain) by the relative displacement of the upper to the lower border or the right border to the left border [12]. Thus, in two dimensions strain has four components, two normal strains and two shear strains. More complex is the deformation of three-dimensional (3D) objects such as myocardial segments. In this case there are three normal strains (along the x, y and z axes) and six shear strains. To completely define the deformation of 3D objects, all nine strain components must be defined. Today, echocardiographic deformation imaging allows 1D measurements based on tissue Doppler imaging and 2D strain measurements based on speckle-tracking imaging.
The amount of deformation (positive or negative strain) is usually expressed in %. Positive strain values describe thickening, negative values describe shortening, of a given myocardial segment related to its original length. During myocardial contraction, as the wall shortens it also thickens and thus assessment of all parameters, radial thickening (positive strain), circumferential shortening (negative strain) and longitudinal shortening (negative strain), is useful for the evaluation of contractile function.
Strain rate (SR) is the rate by which the deformation occurs (deformation or strain per time unit). The unit of strain rate is s-1 and the local rate of deformation or strain per time unit equals velocity difference per unit length:
where ΔV is the velocity gradient in the segment studied. Thus, the velocity gradient (i.e. difference in velocities between two points of the myocardial wall) can be used for SR calculations. The SR has the same direction as the strain (negative strain during shortening and positive strain during elongation).
Ventricular wall motion (velocity and displacement) is position dependent. Thus, as the apical parts of the ventricle pull down the ventricular base, the wall motion velocity and wall displacement increase from apex to base and some of the motion in the base is an effect of apical contraction – tethering. Thus, even completely passive segments, without deformation, can show motion [5].
Myocardial deformation (strain and SR) is more constant along the ventricular wall (position independent if the velocity gradient is evenly distributed). Therefore, strain and SR imaging (deformation analysis) is more useful than wall motion analysis (velocity and displacement) for detection of regional myocardial dysfunction [5,7]. Nevertheless, because of the relationship between myocardial motion and deformation, wall motion velocity measurements by tissue Doppler can be used to obtain regional and global strain (and SR) data [3-7,9,10].
It is important to know that, although strain and SR are particularly suited for the assessment of systolic function (especially regional contractile function), they are not measurements of contractility because deformation is load dependent. Contractility (the basic property of the myocardium that reflects its active state, rather than loading conditions) is reflected by the stress / strain relation [13]. The relation to contractility of the different parameters used to evaluate systolic function can differ. Thus, because the final part of ejection occurs by inertial effects after myocyte contraction is finished, peak systolic strain rate, being an early systolic event, is more closely related to contractility than the ejection fraction (EF) [5].
GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC DEFORMATION IMAGING
Initially myocardial deformation imaging became possible using tissue Doppler [4]. More recently myocardial deformation imaging also become possible with myocardial speckle tracking using 2D echocardiography [15]. Figs. (1) and (2) show examples of myocardial deformation imaging using tissue Doppler and 2D speckle-tracking, respectively. The examples in these 2 figures also show the advantages of strain imaging in comparison to velocity and displacement imaging in the evaluation of regional myocardial contractile function.
Tissue Doppler-Derived Strain and Strain-Rate Imaging
Tissue Doppler imaging (TDI), also known as tissue velocity imaging (TVI), is currently accepted as a sensitive and sufficiently accurate echocardiographic tool for quantitative assessment of cardiac function [3,5-11]. Several tissue Doppler velocity parameters appeared to be useful for the diagnosis and prediction of long-term prognosis in major cardiac diseases [8,10,11]. Myocardial time-velocity curves can be obtained either online as spectral pulsed TDI, known as pulsed wave TDI (PW-TDI), or reconstructed offline from two-dimensional (2D) color coded TDI images, known as color TDI (C-TDI) loops. In addition to velocity and displacement (tissue tracking) measurements, due to the relationship between velocity and strain rate, TDI also allows the reconstruction of strain (and strain rate) curves and color coded images. Thus, the transmural velocity gradient (difference in endocardial and epicardial velocities divided by the instantaneous wall thickness) is equal to the transmural strain rate (rate of wall thickening), whereas the longitudinal velocity gradient over a segment with a fixed distance is a measure of longitudinal strain rate. Before the development of color coded TDI, it was difficult to distinguish myocardial contraction from translational motion of the heart. Thus, during systole, in addition to radial wall thickening and longitudinal wall shortening, the left ventricle (LV) also rotates about its long axis and translates anteriorly. Calculation of myocardial velocity gradients (MVG) allows the assessment of wall motion independently from the translational motion of the heart [3,5,14,15]. However, as shown by the equation for tissue Doppler derived MVG:
where V2 - V1 is the difference in velocities, d is the distance between the two points of velocity measurement and cos θ is the cosine of the angle between the ultrasound beam and the direction of myocardial movement, all tissue Doppler derived data on wall motion and deformation are angle dependent. Thus, for acceptable calculations, an angle deviation below the 20 to 15 degrees is mandatory. It is important to be aware that assessing tissue movement in relation to the transducer rather than relative to adjacent segments is a fundamental limitation of tissue velocity imaging, which can also affect tissue Doppler derived strain (and strain rate) imaging [11].
Although strain and strain rate (SR) measurements derived from the myocardial velocities are promising for the evaluation of ventricular contractile function they also have disadvantages [16]. First of all they are derived from 1-dimension velocity measurements while, as already mentioned, the myocardium deforms simultaneously in three dimensions. An important disadvantage relates to limits on spatial resolution that are imposed by imaging at high temporal resolution. Other disadvantages of the TDI-derived strain and SR imaging technique are the time consuming steps for data acquisition and processing and the necessity of expert readers. It is also important to know that the comparison of adjacent velocities is highly sensitive to signal noise and the signal-to-noise ratio of TDI-derived SR measurements is reduced. This can be improved by increasing sample distance but only in exchange for lower spatial resolution.
Taking into account all the aspects mentioned above it is not surprising that TDI-derived strain and SR measurements are not highly reproducible (more than 10-15% interobserver variability). This is one of the explanations why this technique has not become standard in daily praxis. However, in the hands of very experienced and highly trained operators this method can be a valuable non-invasive tool for routine clinical use to evaluate the myocardial contractile function. Despite all limitations this technique has been initially validated with sonomicrometry and also with magnetic resonance imaging [7,9].
Non-Doppler Speckle-Tracking Derived 2D-Strain Imaging
Non-Doppler 2D-strain imaging derived from speckle tracking is a newer echocardiographic technique for obtaining strain and SR measurements [2,17-21]. It analyzes motion by tracking speckles (natural acoustic markers) in the 2D ultrasonic image. These acoustic markers are statistically equally distributed throughout the myocardium and their size is about 20 to 40 pixels. These markers (“stable” speckles) within the ultrasonic image are tracked from frame to frame. Special software allows spatial and temporal image processing with recognition and selection of such elements on ultrasound images. The geometric shift of each speckle represents local tissue movement. When frame rate is known, the change in speckle position allows determination of its velocity. Thus, the motion pattern of myocardial tissue is reflected by the motion pattern of speckles. By tracking these speckles, strain and strain rate can be calculated. The advantage of this method is that it tracks in two dimensions, along the direction of the wall, not along the ultrasound beam, and thus is angle independent [2]. The 2D echocardiographic loops obtained from pararasternal and apical views are processed offline. This requires only one cardiac cycle to be acquired but strain and SR data can be obtained only with high resolution image quality at high frame rate [2,16]. The necessity of high image quality is a major limitation for routine clinical applicability in all patients. At present, the optimal frame rate for speckle-tracking seems to be 50-70 frames per second (FPS), which is lower compared to TDI (>180 FPS). This could, however, result in under-sampling, especially in patients with tachycardia and also during strain and SR measurements performed throughout stress echocardiography. Moreover, rapid events during the cardiac cycle such as isovolumetric phases may not appear on images and peak SR values may be reduced due to under-sampling, in isovolumetric phases and in early diastole. Using higher frame rates could reduce the under-sampling problem, but this will result in a reduction of spatial resolution and consequently less than optimal region of interest (ROI) tracking [22]. Low frame rate increases the spatial resolution, but because speckle-tracking software uses a frame-by-frame approach to follow the myocardial movement and searches each consecutive frame for a speckle pattern closely resembling and in close proximity to the reference frame, with too low a frame rate the speckle pattern could be outside the search area, again resulting in poor tracking [23,24]. It is also important to know that different tracking algorithms potentially produce different results and therefore it should be kept in mind that a periodical update of the software package conceivably influences reference values.
Although speckle-tracking derived 2D-strain and TDI-derived strain calculations do not give the same values (2D-strain imaging gives lower SR values), strain and SR measurements obtained by these two different imaging techniques correlate well [2]. For the LV, the reproducibility of 2D-strain measurements is better than that of TDI-derived strain measurements. The intraobserver and interobserver variability for 2D-strain and SR measurements were found to be low: 3.6% to 5.3% and 7% to 11.8%, respectively [2]. Ingul et al. found lower interobserver variability for non-Doppler 2D-strain measurements in comparison to TDI-derived strain measurements and automated non-Doppler 2D-strain measurements also appeared significantly less time consuming [18]. The lack of angle dependency is a great advantage of non-Doppler 2D-strain imaging in comparison to TDI-derived strain data.
CLINICAL USEFULNESS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC DEFORMATION IMAGING
Measurements of strain and strain rate by echocardiography have been validated using microcrystals and magnetic resonance imaging [16,25-27]. Comparing non-Doppler 2D-strain imaging with tagged magnetic resonance imaging (the current “gold standard” for deformation analysis) non Doppler 2D-strain measurements correlated well with data obtained by magnetic resonance imaging, both in normal myocardial segments and infarcted areas (r = 0.87, P<0.001) [25]. Experimental work performed on adult dogs showed that global diastolic strain rate can be useful for the assessment of ventricular relaxation and estimation of filling pressures [28]. In a study on 137 consecutive patients with suspected congestive heart failure of different etiologies it was also shown that mean longitudinal LV strain is closely related to plasma brain-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels, in patients with both systolic and diastolic heart failure [29].
Strain and strain rate measurements appeared to be sensitive indicators for sub-clinical diseases, including diabetes, systemic sclerosis, myocardial ischemia, arterial hypertension, isolated mitral regurgitation, aortic regurgitation and non-ischemic cardiomyopathies, and also very useful for the assessment of myocardial damage after infarction, evaluation of myocardial revascularization efficiency and prediction of patient outcome with heart failure [11,30-46]. Early detection of myocardial involvement in asymptomatic patients with systemic sclerosis, diabetes, amyloidosis, Duchenne’s progressive muscular dystrophy and Kawasaki syndrome is an important indication for strain and strain-rate imaging [47-51]. Recently it was also found that 2D-strain imaging is highly sensitive for the early detection of doxorubicin induced cardiac injury, and radial strain reduction in patients who underwent chemotherapy with doxorubicin appeared to be associated with histologic markers of doxorubicin cardiomyopathy [52].
Strain and strain rate assessment also appear to be useful in sports medicine for the quantification of LV systolic function in athletes involved in sports requiring endurance or strength and the differentiation of physiologic hypertrophy in athletes’ hearts from asymptomatic nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, which is the major cause of sudden cardiac death in young competitive athletes [53-55]. Strain imaging may also be used to differentiate physiologic cardiac hypertrophy (“athlete’s heart”) from hypertensive cardiac hypertrophy [56].
Recently it was shown that strain and strain-rate imaging is also useful for the evaluation of right ventricular (RV) function in pulmonary hypertension and RV diseases of different etiologies (RV infarction, arrhythmogenic RV dysplasia/cardiomyopathy) [57-63].
The clinical usefulness of echocardiographic strain and SR imaging in children is another important aspect, especially because in these patients the impact of heart rate (HR) on strain and SR measurements is more evident than in adults. It has been shown that HR changes in healthy children during growth have an important impact on both systolic and diastolic myocardial strain and also on late diastolic SR calculated from color Doppler myocardial imaging [64]. The impact of high heart rates as already mentioned on 2D-strain and SR measurements is of special importance in pediatric patients. Therefore, for the evaluation of regional and global myocardial deformation in children, HR at rest should be considered an important factor.
The assessment of myocardial viability is one of the most important clinical indications for echocardiographic strain and strain-rate imaging. TDI measurements in dogs with experimental occlusion of the left anterior descending (LAD) or circumflex (Cx) coronary artery showed that diastolic strain rate during dobutamine infusion reliably identified segments with >20% transmural infarction and, in comparison to other TDI-derived parameters, it related best to the extent of interstitial fibrosis (r = -0.86; P<0.01) [65]. The validity of non-Doppler 2D-strain imaging for identification and quantification of myocardial ischemia was also proved experimentally in pigs with occlusion of the LAD and in rat ischemia-reperfusion models with temporary LAD occlusion [66,67]. Also it was experimentally shown that speckle-tracking 2D-strain imaging correctly identifies segmental LV dysfunction induced by the scarring that follows myocardial infarction in rats [68]. Both non-Doppler 2D-strain imaging and TDI-derived strain imaging were also used successfully in clinical diagnosis for detection of LV myocardial ischemia and infarction and estimation of myocardial infarction size [32-39]. Strain and strain rate measurements obtained by non-Doppler 2D-strain imaging were found to be highly sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction [2]. In a study on 30 patients Leitmann et al. found that 80.3% of the infarcted segments and 97.8% of normal segments were adequately recognized by speckle tracking based 2D-strain imaging [17]. Comparing the strain and strain rate obtained by speckle tracking based 2D-strain imaging with those obtained in the same patients by TDI, the authors found no significant differences. Comparing the accuracy of 2D-strain imaging derived from speckle tracking with TDI-derived strain imaging in 150 patients undergoing dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) and coronary angiography, Hanekom et al. found similar accuracy of these two methods during DSE in the anterior coronary circulation [69]. However, in the same study the accuracy of 2D-strain rate measurements for the diagnosis of right coronary artery (RCA) stenosis, was lower than that of TDI-derived strain rate measurements. Strain and strain rate measurements also appeared useful for detection of regional myocardial dysfunction in patients with right ventricular (RV) myocardial infarction [69].
Augmentation of strain and strain rate with dobutamine is a marker of myocardial viability and it was shown that deformation parameters obtained by both non-Doppler speckle tracking (2D-strain imaging) and TDI can improve the diagnostic and prognostic assessment of myocardial ischemia and post-infarction scars during dobutamine stress echocardiography [11,31,70-73]. In patients with chronic ischemic LV dysfunction it was shown that combined assessment of long-axis and short-axis function using 2D-strain imaging may be used to identify the transmural extent of myocardial infarction [70].
Important discrepancies were found in patients with coronary stenoses when comparing the results of visual wall motion assessment with those obtained by deformation analysis [2]. The main reason for these discrepancies is well known: the fact that visual assessment of wall motion in four chamber views relies mainly on evaluation of inward motion of the myocardium (the transverse component of contraction), whereas deformation imaging allows the evaluation of functional components such as longitudinal myocardial shortening, which are barely visible to the naked eye [2]. Recently we published our observations on 2 patients with stress cardiomyopathy (Takotsubo cardiomyopathy) in which for the first time cardiac function was evaluated also by 2D-strain imaging [74]. During stress/catecholamine induced LV dysfunction, wall motion analysis performed by 2D-strain imaging revealed in both patients uniform systolic myocardial longitudinal shortening despite the typical ballooning and akinetic appearance of the LV apex and the hyperkinetic movement of the LV base, indicating myocardial viability in the visually nearly akinetic apical region and also questioning the existence of relevant differences in regional myocardial contractility. During maximal LV dysfunction, due to the particular geometry (larger diameters and thinner walls in apical regions), the systolic circumferential wall stress (σc) was several times higher in the apical regions (apical/basal systolic σc-ratios up to 7.3), high enough to oppose circumferential fiber shortening and consequently also high enough to prevent the visible inward wall motion in the apical region. At the same time, as revealed by 2D strain imaging, longitudinal shortening, which is usually not visible with the naked eye, was not affected (Fig. 3). Our findings might be important not only for the explanation of wall motion in stress cardiomyopathy but because they also reveal the potential impact of myocardial deformation analysis on the pathophysiological understanding of myocardial function in relation to ventricular geometry regardless of the nature of cardiac diseases.
The advantages provided by deformation analysis can improve the decision making in patients referred for cardiac surgery and, in our experience, 2D-strain imaging is indeed a valuable tool for evaluation of patients before and after cardiac surgery. Fig. (4) shows an example of longitudinal strain images obtained in a patient before and after coronary bypass operation combined with mitral valve reconstruction.
In our department, 2D-strain imaging is also the method of choice for patient selection for surgical ventricular restoration (SVR) to improve the LV function after severe myocardial infarction. We also found that systolic dyssynchrony and the end-systolic dyssynergy indexes, calculated from regional strain values, are highly sensitive for evaluations of myocardial functional changes during the postoperative reverse remodeling processes after SVR [40,75]. Figs. (5) and (6) show examples of 2D-strain and strain-rate recordings obtained before and after SVR.
Tissue Doppler derived strain and strain rate measurements are also useful for the monitoring of LV function during the reverse remodeling processes after aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis [76].
Before myocardial deformation imaging became available it had already been shown that in heart transplant recipients TDI wall motion assessment is useful for rejection diagnosis and early detection of patients with relevant transplant coronary artery disease (TxCAD) [77-79]. In our department TDI has been routinely used since 1998 and became a cornerstone for the monitoring of cardiac allograft function and for the timing of follow-up myocardial biopsies and coronary angiographies. After 2D-strain imaging became available, its usefulness for post-transplant follow-up monitoring of cardiac function was also investigated [40,80-82]. Comparing the deformation parameters obtained from patients who underwent routine endomyocardial biopsies, Marciniak et al. found significantly lower LV longitudinal and radial peak systolic strain and strain rate values in patients with acute rejection ≥ grade 1B in comparison to those with biopsies graded between 0 and 1A [82]. In patients with biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes ≥ grade 3, we found a significant (p<0.05) reduction of LV systolic and diastolic radial, circumferential and longitudinal global peak strain and strain rate values in comparison to the values measured before rejection. The same changes were also detected in patients with cellular rejections grade ≤ 2 who had clinical symptoms and/or additional immune-histological signs of vascular (humoral) rejection. An example of myocardial strain changes during acute rejection is shown in Fig. (7). Systolic and diastolic global strain rate reduction appeared to be more sensitive for the early detection of acute rejection than the reduction of systolic and early diastolic global strain values. As shown in Fig. (8), even mild acute rejection (grade 1) in completely asymptomatic patients, without any change in conventional echocardiographic parameters, can be associated with relevant strain rate changes. A sudden drop of ≥15% of the radial global strain rate in heart transplanted patients appeared highly predictive for acute biopsy proven rejection [80]. Two-dimensional strain imaging is also useful for the evaluation of anti-rejection treatment efficacy. In patients without visible alterations in LV kinetics, 2D-strain imaging also appeared reliable for non-invasive prediction of TxCAD with and without focal stenoses (>50% narrowing) of main epicardial coronary arteries [40,83,84]. Eroglu et al. found that strain and strain-rate imaging in combination with dobutamine stress echocardiography is useful for early detection of TxCAD before the development of relevant stenoses detectable with conventional angiography [84]. The high predictive value for coronary stenoses of systolic strain dyssynchrony and dyssynergy indexes found in our patients even at rest (positive and negative predictive values of 90%-95% and 91-97%, respectively) recommended 2D-strain imaging as a non-invasive tool with the potential to facilitate early detection of stenoses and to enable angiographies to be timed, sparing patients frequent routine heart catheterizations [40]. Fig. (9) shows examples of strain and strain rate images obtained from heart transplant recipients with focal stenoses of the coronary arteries.
The negative effects of altered electrical activation on ventricular mechanical function were already recognized more than 40 years ago [85]. More recently this aspect has gained important scientific interest and several large clinical trials have established the long-term benefits of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients who have severe LV dysfunction and a wide QRS complex [86,87]. However, despite these promising results, approximately 30% of patients selected on the basis of QRS duration do not respond to CRT and there is increasing evidence that the main predictor of responsiveness to CRT is mechanical rather than electrical dyssynchrony [87,88]. Measurement of regional myocardial electro-mechanical events with velocity data acquired with tissue Doppler imaging facilitate identification of mechanical dyssynchrony and has been shown to be useful to select patients who may better respond to CRT [88]. However, identification of responders by time-delay indexes alone is limited, especially in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy who have myocardial segments with delayed contraction, which is often caused by scar [88]. Two-dimensional strain imaging by speckle tracking and TDI-derived strain imaging are well suited to detecting and defining intraventricular dyssynchrony and they have already proved to be useful for both the selection of patients who might benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and the evaluation of CRT efficiency [83,84,89-94]. The accuracy of speckle tracking 2D-strain echocardiography in the detection and quantification of cardiac dyssynchrony was validated experimentally in canine and sheep models [95,96]. In a canine model of dyssynchrony with and without heart failure, Arita et al. found radial strain by speckle tracking to be more accurate than TDI velocity to detect cardiac dyssynchrony [97]. Nevertheless, whereas parameters of systolic dyssynchrony based on TDI longitudinal and radial velocity measurements were able to predict the efficacy of CRT in patients with heart failure, parameters of systolic dyssynchrony based on longitudinal and radial strain data obtained from TDI and speckle tracking 2D-strain imaging appeared not predictive for CRT results [91,94]. However, the combination of parameters of systolic dyssynchrony based on TDI longitudinal velocity with parameters of systolic dyssynchrony based on radial strain data obtained by speckle-tracking (2D-strain imaging) showed the highest predictive value for LV functional response to CRT, which was significantly better than that of either technique alone (p<0.0001) [98]. Recently, the value of strain imaging for prediction of future reverse remodelling after CRT has been improved by the development of a strain delay index calculated by use of longitudinal strain assessed by 2D speckle tracking [88]. At a cut-off value of ≥25% the strain delay index showed high positive and negative predictive values (90% both) for response to CRT [88]. Also recently it was shown that the incorporation of local 2-D echocardiographic deformation data into a 3-D model by dedicated software allows a comprehensive analysis of spatio-temporal distribution patterns of myocardial dyssynchrony of the global LV deformation and the development of new indexes that may better reflect myocardial dyscoordination and/or impaired ventricular contractile efficiency [99]. An important aspect for CRT effectiveness is its dependency on the LV lead position. To find out the optimal LV lead position is therefore a major goal, and recent studies have shown that 2D-strain imaging is a useful tool for this purpose [91].
Mechanical dyssynchrony of the LV is a more sensitive marker of myocardial dysfunction than the ejection fraction (LVEF) [93,96]. In patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy who were accepted for heart transplantation (HTx) we found that systolic and diastolic LV dyssynchrony and dyssynergy, which were detectable by 2D-strain imaging in all investigated patients, were more closely related to hemodynamic alterations, exercise intolerance and patient outcome than LVEF [100]. We also found that 2D-strain imaging provides prognostic information, which can be useful for patients’ selection for HTx. Thus, in patients with similar LVEF, those with rapid worsening toward inotropic support dependence showed higher dyssynchrony and lower global strain rate values than those who remained clinically stable (p<0.01) [100].
In patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) we found that TDI is useful in the evaluation of myocardial recovery during mechanical unloading [101]. The more recent introduction of 2D-strain imaging in our weaning protocol for patients with mechanical circulatory support has substantially improved our ability to evaluate cardiac recovery during mechanical unloading and the information obtained (global strain and strain rate plus evaluation of mechanical synchrony and synergy) was essential to the decision to wean six patients from their assist devices. To date none of these 6 patients showed heart failure recurrence after assist device explantation. Fig. (10) shows the time course of 2D-strain images recorded during reduction of the LVAD (Type Incor) rate in a patient with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy who showed relevant myocardial recovery during mechanical unloading.
Although strain rate imaging provides several details on diastolic ventricular function, the clinical value of diastolic strain and strain rate parameters was less investigated. Wall motion velocity measurements with pulsed-wave tissue Doppler revealed high predictive values for acute cardiac allograft rejection of early diastolic wall motion peak velocity (Em) reduction, prolongation of early diastolic time (TEm = from onset of relaxation to the peak of the early diastolic wave Em) and reduction of Em/TEm ratio [77]. Preliminary results of our recently started investigation on the clinical value of cardiac rejection surveillance with 2D strain imaging also revealed a significant reduction in early diastolic strain rate (DSRE) and prolongation of the time from onset of relaxation to the peak of DSRE during acute cardiac rejection, suggesting the usefulness of diastolic strain parameters as markers for early non-invasive detection of cardiac rejection [40]. The assessment of diastolic function by 2D-strain imaging appeared also useful for the evaluation of patients referred for heart transplantation because parameters like late diastolic strain rate (DSRA) and the diastolic E/A strain rate ratio (DSRE /DSRA) showed high predictive values for the outcome of patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDCM) during the first 6 months after listing for HTx [102].
In IDCM patients with similar LVEF and peak oxygen consumption (VO2max) at the time of listing for HTx, those who showed rapid clinical worsening had significantly (<0.01) lower DSRA and higher DSRE /DSRA ratios than those who remained stable during the first 6 post-listing months [102]. At a cut-off value of <0.3/s the DSRA showed high positive and negative predictive values (89% and 90%, respectively) for deterioration of cardiac function during the first 6 post-weaning months which recommend this parameter as a useful tool for listing decisions (elective, urgency or high-urgency) [102].
A next step in development of deformation imaging by echocardiography which will be superior to the 2D strain and SR imaging will be the calculation of strain and SR in three dimensions during the same heart cycle. The potential diagnostic benefits of this further technical development remain, however, to be established.
CONCLUSIONS
Echocardiographic strain and strain-rate imaging is a promising tool for the evaluation of myocardial function. The spectrum of potential clinical applications is very wide due its ability to differentiate between active and passive movement of myocardial segments, to quantify intra-ventricular dyssynchrony and to evaluate components of myocardial function such as longitudinal myocardial shortening that are not visually assessable. The high sensitivity of both TDI-derived and 2D speckle tracking derived strain and strain rate data for the early detection of myocardial dysfunction recommend this new non-invasive diagnostic method for routine clinical use. Speckle tracking derived 2D-strain measurements have the advantage of angle independency but are sensitive to image quality. TDI-derived strain measurements are less sensitive to image quality but the angle dependency of the method is an important limitation. In addition to early detection of myocardial dysfunction of different etiologies, assessment of myocardial viability, detection of acute allograft rejection after HTx and early detection of patients with TxCAD, strain and strain rate measurements are helpful in the selection of different therapies (CRT, coronary revascularization, SVR and HTx). Strain and strain rate data also provide valuable prognostic information, especially for prediction of future reverse remodelling after left ventricular restoration surgery or after CRT and prediction of short and median-term outcome without transplantation or ventricular assist device implantation of patients referred for HTx.
REFERENCES
- 1.Sheehan FH. Quantitative evaluation of regional left ventricular systolic function. In: Otto CM, editor. The Practice of Clinical Echocardiography. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 2002. pp. 65–87. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Perk G, Tunick PA, Kronzon I. Non-Doppler two-dimensional strain imaging by echocardiography – from technical considerations to clinical applications. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007;49(19):1903–14. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2006.08.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sutherland G, Steward M, Groundstroen K, et al. Color Doppler myocardial imaging: a new technique for the assessment of myocardial function. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1994;7:441–58. doi: 10.1016/s0894-7317(14)80001-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Heimdal A, Stoylen A, Torp H, Skjaerpe T. Real time strain rate imaging of the left verntricle by ultrasound. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1998;11:1013–19. doi: 10.1016/s0894-7317(98)70151-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Stouylen A, Heimdal A, Bjornstad K, et al. Strain rate imaging by ultrasound in the diagnosis of regional dysfunction of the left ventricle. Echocardiography. 1999;16(4):321–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.1999.tb00821.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Veyrat C, Pellerin D, Larrazet F. Myocardial Doppler tissue imaging: past, present and future. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1997;90(10):1391–402. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Urheim S, Edvardsen T, Torp H, et al. Myocardial strain by Doppler echocardiography: validation of a new method to quantify regional myocardial function. Circulation. 2000;102:1158–64. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.102.10.1158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Waggoner AD, Bierig SM. Tissue Doppler imaging: a useful echocardiographic method for the cardiac sonographer to assess systolic and diastolic ventricular function. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2001;14(12):1143–52. doi: 10.1067/mje.2001.115391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Edvardsen T, Gerber BL, Garot J, et al. Qualitative assessment of intrinsic regional myocardial deformation by Doppler strain rate echocardiography in humans: Validation against three-dimensional tagged magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2002;106:50–56. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000019907.77526.75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sengupta PP, Mohan JC, Pandian NG. Tissue Doppler echocardiography: principles and applications. Indian Heart J. 2002;54(4):368–78. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yu CM, Sanderson JE, Marwick TH, Oh JK. Tissue Doppler imaging a new prognosticator for cardiovascular diseases. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;20(3):234–243. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.D’Hooge J, Heimdal A, Jamal F, et al. Regional strain and strain rate measurements by cardiac ultrasound: principles, implementation and limitations. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2000;1(3):154–70. doi: 10.1053/euje.2000.0031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Aurigemma GP, Douglas PS, Gaasch HW. Quantitative evaluation of left ventricular structure, wall stress and systolic function. In: Otto CM, editor. The Practice of Clinical Echocardiography. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 2002. pp. 65–87. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Flemming AD, Xia X, McDicken WM, et al. Myocardial velocity gradients detected by Doppler imaging. Br J Radiol. 1994;67:679–88. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-67-799-679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Uematsu M, Miyatake K, Tanaka N, et al. Myocardial velocity gradient as a new indicator of regional left ventricular contraction: detection by two-dimensional tissue Doppler imaging technique. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;26:217–23. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00158-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Marwick TH. Measurement of strain and strain rate by echocardiography: ready for prime time? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:1313–27. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.11.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Leitman M, Lysyansky P, Sidenko S, et al. Two-dimensional strain-a novel software for real time quantitative echocardiographic assessment of myocardial function. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2004;17:1021–29. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2004.06.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ingul CB, Torp H, Aase SA. Automated analyses of strain rate and strain: feasibility and clinical implications. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005;18:411–18. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2005.01.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Modesto KM, Cauduro S, Dispezieri A, et al. Two-dimensional acoustic pattern derived strain parameters closely correlate with one-dimensional tissue Doppler derived strain measurements. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2006;7:315–21. doi: 10.1016/j.euje.2005.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Serri K, Reant P, Lafitte M, et al. Global and regional myocardial function quantification by two-dimensional strain. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:1175–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.10.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Reisner SA, Lysyansky P, Agmon Y, et al. Global longitudinal strain: a novel index of left ventricular systolic function. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2004;17:630–33. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2004.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Teske AJ, De Boeck BWL, Olimulder M, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of regional right ventricular function. A head to head comparison between 2D-strain and tissue Doppler derived strain analysis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007;21(3):275–83. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2007.08.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Behar V, Adam D, Lysyanski P, et al. Improving motion estimation by accounting for local image distorsion. Ultrasonics. 2004;43(1):57–65. doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2004.02.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Korinek J, Kjaergaard J, Sengupta PP, et al. High spatial resolution speckle tracking improves accuracy of 2-dimensional strain measurements. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007;20(2):165–70. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2006.08.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Amundsen BH, Helle-Valle T, Edvardson T, et al. Noninvasive myocardial strain measurement by a novel automated tracking system from digital image files. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:789–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.10.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kylmälä MM, Antila MK, Kivistö SM, et al. Tissue-Doppler strain-mapping in the assessment of the extent of chronic myocardial infarction: validation using magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2008;9(5):678–84. doi: 10.1093/ejechocard/jen127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Urheim S, Edvardson T, Torp B, et al. Myocardial strain by Doppler echocardiography. Validation of a new method to quantify regional myocardial function. Circulation. 2000;102:1158–64. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.102.10.1158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wang J, Khouri DS, Thohan V, et al. Global diastolic strain rate for assessment of left ventricular relaxation and filling pressure. Circulation. 2007;115(11):1376–83. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.662882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yoneyama A, Koyama J, Tomita T, et al. Relationship of plasma brain-type natriuretic peptide levels to left ventricular longitudinal function in patients with congestive heart failure by strain Doppler imaging. Int J Cardiol. 2008;130(1):56–63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.07.171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Edvardsen T, Skulstad H, Aakhus S, et al. Regional myocardial systolic function during acute myocardial ischemia assessed by strain Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37(3):726–30. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)01160-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sutherland GR, Di SG, Claus J, et al. Strain and strain rate imaging: a new clinical approach to quantifying regional myocardial function. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2004;17:788–802. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2004.03.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Voigt JU, Exner B, Schmiedehausen K, et al. Strain-rate imaging during dobutamin stress echocardiography provides objective evidence of inducible ischemia. Circulation. 2003;107:2120–26. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000065249.69988.AA. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Vartdal T, Brunwand H, Pettersen E, et al. Early prediction of infarct size by strain Doppler echocardiography after coronary reperfusion. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49(16):1715–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.12.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Weidemann F, Jung P, Hoyer C, et al. Assessment of contractile reserve in patients with intermediate coronary lesions: a strain imaging study validated by invasive myocardial fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J. 2007;28(12):1425–32. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Gjesdal O, Hopp E, Vartdal T, et al. Global longitudinal strain measured by two-dimensional speckle tracking is closely related to myocardial infarct size in chronic ischemic heart disease. Clin Sci (Lond) 2007;113(6):287–96. doi: 10.1042/CS20070066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Winter R, Jussila R, Nowak J, Brodin LA. Speckle tracking echocardiography is a sensitive tool for detection of myocardial ischemia: a pilot study from the catheterization laboratory during percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007;20(8):974–81. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2007.01.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Tanaka H, Oishi Y, Mizuguchi Y, et al. Three-dimensional evaluation of dobutamine-induced changes in regional myocardial deformation in ischemic myocardium using ultrasonic strain measurements: the role of circumferential shortening. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007;20(11):1294–99. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2007.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Qu HY, Yao GH, Sun WY. Assessment of ischemic myocardium by strain-rate imaging during adenosine stress echocardiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2007;23(6):725–32. doi: 10.1007/s10554-006-9183-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Liang HY, Cauduro S, Pellukka P, et al. Usefulness of two-dimensional speckle strain for evaluation of left ventricular diastolic deformation in patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98(12):1581–86. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.07.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Dandel M, Knosalla C, Lehmkuhl H, Hetzer R. Non-Doppler two-dimensional strain imaging – clinical application. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007;20(8):1119. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2007.04.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Artis NJ, Oxborough DL, Williams G, et al. Two-dimensional strain imaging: a new echocardiographic advance with research and clinical applications. Int J Cardiol. 2008;123(3):240–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.02.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Marciniak A, Claus P, Sutherland GR, et al. Changes in systolic left ventricular function in isolated mitral regurgitation. A strain rate imaging study. Eur Heart J. 2007;28(21):2627–36. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kepez A, Akdogan A, Sade LE, et al. Detection of subclinical cardiac involvement in systemic sclerosis by Echocardiographic stain imaging. Echocardiography. 2008;25:191–97. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2007.00582.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hare JL, Brown JK, Marwick TH. Association of myocardial strain with left ventricular geometry and prognosis of hypertensive heart disease. Am J Cardiol. 2008;102:87–91. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.02.101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Donal E, De Place C, Kervio G, et al. Mitral regurgitation in dilated cardiomyopathy : value of both regional left ventricular contractility and dyssynchrony. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009;10(1):133–8. doi: 10.1093/ejechocard/jen188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Marciniak A, Sutherland GR, Marciniak M, et al. Myocardial deformation abnormalities in patients with aortic regurgitation: a strain rate imaging study. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009;10(1):112–9. doi: 10.1093/ejechocard/jen185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.D’Andrea A, Stisi S, Caso P, et al. Associations between left ventricular myocardial involvement and endothelial dysfunction in systemic sclerosis: noninvasive assessment in asymptomatic patients. Echocardiography. 2007;24(6):587–97. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2007.00436.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Galderisi M, de Simone G, Inneli P, et al. Impaired inotropic response to type 2 diabetes mellitus: a strain rate imaging study. Am J Hypertens. 2007;20(5):548–55. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2006.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Bellavia D, Abraham TP, Pellikka PA, et al. Detection of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in cardiac amyloidosis with strain rate echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007;20(10):1194–202. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2007.02.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Mori K, Hayabuchi Y, Inoue M, et al. Myocardial strain imaging for early detection of cardiac involvement in patients with Duchenne’s progressive muscular dystrophy. Echocardiography. 2007;24(6):598–608. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2007.00437.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Arnold R, Goebel B, Ulmer HE, et al. An exercise tissue Doppler strain rate imaging study of diastolic myocardial dysfunction after Kawasaki syndrome in childhood. Cardiol Young. 2007;17(5):778–86. doi: 10.1017/S1047951107000959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Migrino RQ, Aggarwal D, Konorev E, et al. Early detection of doxorubicin cardiomyopathy using two-dimensional strain echocardiography. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2008;34:208–14. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2007.07.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Poulsen SH, Hjortshøj S, Korup E, et al. Strain rate and tissue tracking imaging in quantification of left ventricular systolic function in endurance and strength athletes. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2007;17(2):148–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2006.00538.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.D’Andrea A, De Corato G, Scarafile R, et al. Left atrial myocardial function in either physiologic or pathologic left ventricular hypertrophy: A two-dimensional speckle strain study. Br J Sports Med. 2008;42(8):696–702. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2007.041210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Richand V, Lafitte S, Reant P, et al. An ultrasound speckle tracking (two-dimensional strain) analysis of myocardial deformation in profesional soccer players compared with healthy subjects and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 2007;100(1):128–32. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.02.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Saghir M, Areces M, Makan M. Strain rate imaging differentiates hypertensive cardiac hypertrophy from physiologic cardiac hypertrophy (athlete’s heart) J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007;20(2):151–57. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2006.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Sevimli G, Gundogdu F, Aksakal E, et al. Right ventricular strain rate properties in patients with right ventricular myocardial infarction. Echocardiography. 2007;24(7):732–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2007.00470.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Lindquist P, Calcutteea A, Henein M. Echocardiography in the assessment of the right heart function. Eur J Echocardiogr . 2007 doi: 10.1016/j.euje.2007.04.002. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Gondi S, Dokainish H. Right ventricular tissue Doppler and strain imaging: Ready for clinical use? Echocardiogaphy. 2007;24(5):322–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2007.00430.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.López-Candales A, Rajagopolan N, Dohi K, et al. Abnormal right ventricular myocardial strain generation in mild pulmonary hypertension. Echocardiography. 2007;24(6):615–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2007.00439.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Dambrauskaite V, Delcroix M, Claus P, et al. Regional right ventricular dysfunction in chronic pulmonary hypertension. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007;20(10):1172–80. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2007.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Huez S, Vachiéry JL, Unger P, et al. Tissue Doppler imaging evaluation of cardiac adaptation in severe pulmonary hypertension. Am J Cardiol. 2007;100(9):1473–78. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.06.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Prakasa KR, Wang J, Tandri H, et al. Utility of tissue Doppler and strain echocardiography in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 2007;100:1473–78. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.03.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Boettler P, Hartmann M, Watzl K, et al. Heart rate effects on strain and strain rate in healthy children. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005;18:1121–3. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2005.08.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Park TH, Nagueh SF, Khoury DS, et al. Impact of myocardial structure and function postinfarction on diastolic strain measurements: implications for assessment of myocardial viability. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006;209:H724–H731. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00714.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Sun JP, Niu J, Chou D, et al. Alterations of regional myocardial function in a swine model of myocardial infarction assessed by echocardiographic 2-dimensional strain imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007;20(5):498–504. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2006.10.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Migrino RQ, Zhu X, Pajewski N, et al. Assessment of segmental myocardial viability using regional 2-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007;20(4):342–51. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2006.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Popovic ZB, Benjam C, Bian J, et al. Speckle-tracking echocardiography correctly identifies segmental left vetricular dysfunction induced by scarring in a rat model of myocardial infarction. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007;292(6):H2809–16. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01176.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Hanekom L, Cho GY, Leano R, et al. Comparison of two-dimensional speckle and tissue Doppler strain measurement during dobutamine stress echocardiography: an angiographic correlation. Eur Heart J. 2007;28(14):1765–72. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Chan J, Hanekom L, Wong C, et al. Differentiation of subendocardial and transmural myocardial infarction using two-dimensional strain rate imaging to assess short and long axis function. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:2226–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.07.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Bjork Ingul C, Rozis E, Marwick TH. Prediction of mortality using strain rate in dobutamine stress echocardiography. Circulation. 2006;112:II635. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.640334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Park YH, Kang SJ, Song JK, et al. Prognostic value of longitudinal strain after primary reperfusion therapy in patients with anterior-wall acute myocardial infarction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008;21(3):262–7. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2007.08.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Ingul CB, Stoylen A, Slordahl SA, et al. Automated analysis of myocardial deformation at dobutamine stress echocardiography: an angiography validation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49(15):1651–59. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Dandel M, Lehmkuhl H, Knosalla C, Hetzer R. Left ventricular wall motion abnormality and myocardial dysfunction in stress cardiomyopathy: New pathophysiological aspects suggested by echocardiography. Int J Cardiol. 2008 doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.03.070. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Knosalla C, Dandel M, Kuckucka M, et al. Acute decrease of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony and improvement of contractile state after left ventricular restoration. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;55:S125. [Google Scholar]
- 76.Poulsen SH, Sogaard P, Nielsen-Kudsk JE, Egeblad H. Recovery of left ventricular systolic longitudinal strain after valve replacement in aortic stenosis and relation to natriuretic peptide. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007;20(7):877–84. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2006.11.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Dandel M, Hummel M, Müller J, et al. Reliability of tissue Doppler Wall motion monitoring after heart transplantation for replacement of invasive routine screenings by optimally timed cardiac biopsies and catheterizations. Circulation. 2001;104(suppl):I-184–I-191. doi: 10.1161/hc37t1.094855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Derumeaux G, Redonnet M, Soyer R, et al. Assessment of the progression of cardiac allograft vasculopathy by dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1998;17(3):259–67. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Dandel M, Wellnhofer E, Hummel M, et al. Early detection of left ventricular dysfunction related to transplant coronary artery disease. J Heart Lung Tranplant. 2003;22:1353–64. doi: 10.1016/s1053-2498(03)00055-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Dandel M, Lehmkuhl H, Knosalla C, Hetzer R. Tissue Doppler imaging: Diagnostic and prognostic value. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50(16):1614. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.06.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Dandel M, Lehmkuhl H, Knosalla C, Hetzer R. Non-Doppler two-dimensional strain imaging for early detection of heart transplant recipients with coronary stenoses. Circulation. 2007;116(16 suppl.):II–322. [Google Scholar]
- 82.Marciniak A, Eroglu E, Marciniak M, et al. The potential clinical role of strain and strain rate imaging in diagnosing acute rejection after heart transplantation. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2007;8(3):213–21. doi: 10.1016/j.euje.2006.03.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Dandel M, Wellnhofer E, Lehmkuhl H, et al. Early detection of left ventricular wall motion alterations in heart allografts with coronary artery disease: diagnostic value of tissue Doppler and two-dimensional (2D) strain echocardiography. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2006;7:S127–28. [Google Scholar]
- 84.Eroglu E, D’hooge J, Sutherland GR, et al. Quantitative dobutamine stress echocardiography for the early detection of cardiac allograft vasculopathy in heart transplant recipients. Heart. 2008;94(2):e3. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2007.119693. Epub 2007 Okt 4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Vagnini FJ, Gourin A, Antell HI, Stuckey JH. Implantation sites of cardiac pacemaker electrodes and myocardial contractility. Ann Thorac Surg. 1967;4:431–39. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)66265-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Bristow MR, Saxon LA, Boehmer J, et al. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2140–50. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Cleland JG, Daubert JC, Erdmann E, et al. The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1539–49. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Lim P, Buakhamsri A, Popoviv ZB, et al. Longitudinal strain delay index by speckle tracking imaging. A new marker of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circulation. 2008;118:1130–37. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.750190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Teske AJ, De Boeck BM, Melman PG, et al. Echocardiographic quantification of myocardial function using tissue deformation imaging, a guide to image acquisition and analysis using tissue Doppler and speckle tracking. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2007;30:5–27. doi: 10.1186/1476-7120-5-27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Friedberg MK, Silverman NH, Dubin AM, Rosenthal DN. Mechanical dyssynchrony in children with systolic dysfunction secundary to cardiomyopathy: a Doppler tissue vector velocity imaging study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007;20(6):756–63. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2006.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Becker M, Franke A, Breithardt OA, et al. Impact of left ventricular lead position on the efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy: a two-dimensional strain echocardiography study. Heart. 2007;93(10):1197–203. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2006.095612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Knebel F, Schattke S, Bondke H, et al. Evaluation of longitudinal and radial two-dimensional strain imaging versus Doppler tissue echocardiography in predicting long-term response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007;20(4):335–41. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2006.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Becker M, Kramann R, Franke A, et al. Impact of left ventricular lead position in cardiac resynchronization therapy on left ventricular remodeling. A circumferential strain analysis based on 2D echocardiography. Eur Heart J. 2007;28(10):1211–20. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Gorcsan J 3rd, Tanabe M, Bleeker GB, et al. Combined longitudinal and radial dyssynchrony predicts ventricular response after resynchronization therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50(15):1476–83. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.06.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Nagueh SF. Mechanical dyssynchrony in congestive heart failure: diagnostic and therapeutic implications. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51(1):18–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.08.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Yu CM, Gorcsan J 3rd, Bleeker GB, et al. Usefulness of tissue Doppler velocity and strain dyssynchrony for predicting left ventricular reverse remodeling response after cardiac resynchronization therapy. Am J Cardiol. 2007;100(8):1263–70. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.05.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Arita T, Sorescu GP, Schuler BT, et al. Speckle-tracking stain echocardiography for detecting cardiac dyssynchrony in a canine model of dyssynchrony and heart failure. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007;293(1):H735–42. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00168.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Rappaport D, Konyukhov E, Shulman L, et al. Detection of the cardiac activation sequence by novel echocardiographic tissue tracking method. J Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007;33(6):880–93. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.De Boeck BWL, Kirn B, Teske AJ, et al. Three-dimensional mapping of mechanical activation patterns, contractile dyssynchrony and dyscoordination by two-dimensional strain echocardiography. Cardiovascular Ultrasound. 2008;6:22. doi: 10.1186/1476-7120-6-22. (doi: 10.1186/1476-7120-6-22) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Dandel M, Suramelasvili N, Lehmkuhl H, et al. 2D strain echocardiography a novel non-invasive tool for pretransplant evaluation of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2007;26(2S):S239. [Google Scholar]
- 101.Dandel M, Weng Y, Siniawski H, et al. Long-term results in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy after weaning from left ventricular assist devices. Circulation. 2005;112(suppl):I-37–I-45. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.525352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Jasaityte R, Dandel M, Lehmkuhl HB, Hetzer R. Echocardiographic prediction of short–term outcome in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy referred for transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2008 doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.10.083. (in press) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]