The membrane-embedded cytochrome (cyt) b6f complex mediates electron transport between the photosystem II and photosystem I reaction center complexes in oxygenic photosynthesis.1 The 220 kDa b6f complex consists of eight polypeptide subunits in each monomer of a functional dimer.2–5 Four relatively large subunits bind five redox cofactors of the complex (Fe2S2, hemes bp, bn, cn, f). Cyt b6f couples oxidation–reduction of lipophilic plastoquinol and reduction of high potential soluble plastocyanin or cyt c66 to proton translocation across the membrane, thereby generating a transmembrane proton electrochemical potential gradient. The core structure resembles that of the cyt bc1 complex of the mitochondrial respiratory7 and photosynthetic bacterial electron transport chains.8 However, the cyt b6f complex contains three prosthetic groups per monomer not found in the cyt bc1 complex: chlorophyll a, β-carotene, and heme cn2,3 that is unique in not utilizing any amino acid side chain as an axial ligand. The function of heme cn is an open question and the focus of this paper. Heme cn interacts electronically with heme bn via an axial OH− or H2O bridged through a H-bond to a propionate oxygen of heme bn (Figure 1).9,10 The other axial site of heme cn is unoccupied and open to the quinone-exchange cavity that separates the two b6f monomers. c-Type hemes with an open coordination site are uncommon and usually associated with catalytic functions. Heme cn can bind the quinone analogues NQNO4,9–12 or TDS4 at the open coordination site, suggesting that plastoquinone (PQ) can bind near heme cn, be reduced by hemes bn/cn that have been reduced by the Q cycle or cyclic electron transport, and thereby serve as an n-side electron transfer intermediate electron donor from the b6f complex to the PQ pool. Based on these observations, it was proposed that this heme pair facilitates a concerted two-electron reduction of the n-side PQ, thereby avoiding the generation of a plastosemiquinone intermediate and ensuing formation of reactive oxygen species.9,13
Figure 1.
Hemes bn and cn of the cyt b6f complex.
The present study examines the ligand-binding properties of heme cn. Previous studies have shown that cyanide, butyl isocyanide, and azide do not bind to isolated cyt b6f.9,14 Three other common heme ligands (fluoride, imidazole, or nitric oxide) were added to the cyt b6f complex in the present study and examined for binding to the complex. Addition of these small molecules in large excess to the isolated cyt b6f complex did not result in a change to the EPR spectra. The binding constant of NO for ferric hemes is Keq = 103 to 105 M−1.15,16 If the binding constant of NO to heme cn is within this range, the loss of the native cyt b6f signal due to NO binding would be readily detectable. Thus, the native ferric state of the heme cn does not bind these molecules. All known five-coordinate ferric hemes bind cyanide, except when sterically hindered by close protein residues, which is not seen in crystal structures of wild type cyt b6f.2–5 Membrane proteins with active sites deep within the membrane (e.g., cyt c oxidase) also bind cyanide, where charged molecules might not penetrate. The crystal structure data indicate that access to heme cn is not blocked by the side chains of the neighboring amino acid residues and that the heme cn site is located near the surface of the protein and the membrane.2–5 Furthermore, neutral forms of these putative inhibitor molecules also do not bind. At present, it is unclear what interferes with the coordination of these small molecules. Since the quinone analogues NQNO and TDS are known to bind near heme cn, an obvious candidate would be PQ. PQ has not been detected at this location in the crystal structures of cyt b6f.2–5 However, the O2 surrogate NO is shown here to serve as a ligand to reduced heme cn as presented next.
Samples of cyt b6f were anaerobically reduced with sodium dithionite, and their X-band EPR spectra were recorded (Figure 2A). As expected, these spectra showed loss of all signals except for the Fe2S2 cluster signal, which was significantly more intense and quantified to a concentration in agreement with the protein concentration determined optically from cyt f. Upon addition of NO to the anaerobically reduced complex, a new signal appeared (Figure 2B). Figure 2C shows this new signal after a subtraction of the overlapping Fe2S2 cluster signal. Figure 2D shows a Q-band spectrum of the same sample state after subtraction of the Fe2S2 signal. The simulations overlaid on the data (Figure 2C, D) are calculated with the same parameter set: a nearly axial S = 1/2 system with g = (2.003, 2.011, 2.108) and 14N nuclear hyperfine coupling tensor of A = (49, 57, 45) MHz. The multifrequency EPR data allows determination of the full hyperfine tensor of the species. The magnitude of the observed hyperfine splitting is typical of NO. Thus, this new signal originates from an [FeNO]7 spin system, indicating binding of a single molecule of NO to heme cn. The conversion of the ferrous heme cn to the NO-bound form was quantitative, indicating that NO binds tightly to heme cn.
Figure 2.
(A–C) X- and (D) Q-band EPR spectra of (A) anaerobically reduced cyt b6f complex from spinach, (B) after addition of nitric oxide, (C, D, gray) after subtraction of reduced state without NO. Simulations (C, D, black) of the S = 1/2 heme cn-NO species using the parameters given in the text, additionally, σg = (0.0054, 0.0016, 0.0060). Experimental conditions: temperature 8 K (X), 34 K (Q); power, 0.002 mW (X), 0.2 mW (Q).
This is the first clear evidence for access of O2-like molecules to the open coordination site of heme cn. Previous reports have observed small changes in the absorption spectra of cyt b6f upon addition of CO, but conclusions regarding the effect on cyt b6f were ambiguous.14 The g- and A-values of cyt b6f-NO and several related five- or six-coordinate NO complexes are given in Table S1 for comparison. The g- and A-values values for heme cn-NO of cyt b6f are in the range typical of five-coordinate heme–NO complexes.
Heme cn has no axial protein ligation, and the hemes in the heme bn/cn pair are bridged by OH− or H2O.2–4 The protonation state of this axial ligand is relevant to the function of the heme pair in determination of the reduction potential,17 and possibly as part of the proton pump mechanism of the complex.3 Five-coordinate Fe(III) porphyrin complexes have been characterized for which the axial ligand is either OH−18 or H2O.19 The hydroxide complexes are high spin (S = 5/2), whereas the water complexes are intermediate spin (S = 3/2) species. The EPR data indicate that native heme cn is high spin.9 On the basis of comparison with characterized porphyrin complexes, we conclude that the axial ligand for oxidized heme cn is OH−, as indicated in Figure 1.
Implications for Function
The discovery in the present study that heme cn can bind NO implies that heme cn may also function as an oxidase. NO is a useful O2 surrogate, as O2 binding to ferrous hemes cannot be readily probed with EPR spectroscopy, and optical detection of O2 binding to the b6f complex is complicated by the presence of the three other hemes and a chlorophyll whose absorbance may mask that of the heme cn.
The existence of a heme in the photosynthetic electron transport chain with properties of an oxidase is meaningful for a large number of experimental phenomena in oxygenic photosynthesis in which a low rate of oxygen uptake, or a water to water pathway, has been documented in the intermediate electron transport chain.20–25 In addition, pathways of dark oxidation from NAD(P)H to plastoquinone have been documented.21,26,27 Given the large number of pathways for which a plastoquinol terminal oxidase has been proposed, but the actual oxidase not identified, it is proposed that one of the functions of heme cn, the only prosthetic group in the electron transport chain with oxidase-like properties, is the putative oxidase. It is recognized that this hypothesis has difficulties: (a) Studies on chlororespiration in C. reinhardtii with a cyt b6f mutant implied the lack of involvement of the b6f complex in this system;22 (b) In recent studies on the green alga, Ostreococcus,24 and the cyanobacterium, Synechococcus,25 the lack of complete inhibition of the light-induced oxygen uptake by the quinone analogue inhibitor, DBMIB, led to the same conclusion. However, the DBMIB inhibition site, on the p- or lumenal side of the membrane, would be bypassed if PQH2 was directly oxidized by heme cn. The crystal structure data for the b6f complex show that there are no structural barriers to this reaction.2–5 The crystal structures with bound quinone-analogue inhibitors imply that heme cn is the n-side site for reduction of PQ. Of course, the structure data do not distinguish the direction of the redox reaction at heme cn. The similarity of the midpoint potentials of PQ/PQH2 and heme cn11 would allow reversible redox reactions. It is then hypothesized that heme cn can serve as an electron donor to PQ or acceptor at a low rate from PQH2, depending on whether the heme bn/cn couple is in a redox state that is mostly reduced by the Q-cycle or the cyclic pathway4 or is oxidized in the dark or the post illumination state.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgment
Financial support for this work is from NIH: GM-77387 (M.P.H.) and GM-38323 (W.A.C.). We thank T. Zakharova for technical assistance.
Footnotes
Supporting Information Available: Materials, methods, and EPR parameters of heme–NO complexes. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
References
- 1.Cramer WA, Zhang H, Yan J, Kurisu G, Smith JL. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2006;75:769–790. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.75.103004.142756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kurisu G, Zhang H, Smith JL, Cramer WA. Science. 2003;302:1009–1014. doi: 10.1126/science.1090165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Stroebel D, Choquet Y, Popot J-L, Picot D. Nature. 2003;426:413–418. doi: 10.1038/nature02155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yamashita E, Zhang H, Cramer WA. J. Mol. Biol. 2007;370:39–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.04.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Baniulis D, Yamashita E, Whitelegge JP, Zatsman AI, Hendrich MP, Hasan SS, Ryan CM, Cramer WA. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:9861–9869. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M809196200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cramer WA, Soriano GM, Ponomarev M, Huang D, Zhang H, Martinez SE, Smith JL. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1996;47:477–508. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.47.1.477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Berry EA, Guergova-Kuras M, Huang L-S, Crofts AR. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2000;69:1005–1075. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.69.1.1005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Esser L, Elberry M, Zhou F, Yu CA, Yu L, Xia D. J. Biol. Chem. 2008;283:2846–2857. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M708608200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zatsman AI, Zhang H, Gunderson WA, Cramer WA, Hendrich MP. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:14246–14247. doi: 10.1021/ja065798m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Baymann F, Giusti F, Picot D, Nitschke W. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007;104:519–524. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0606369104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Alric J, Pierre Y, Picot D, Lavergne J, Rappaport F. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005;102:15860–15865. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0508102102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cramer WA, Baniulis D, Yamashita E, Zhang H, Zatsman A, Hendrich MP. Cytochrome b6f Complex: Structure, Spectroscopy, and Function of Heme cn: n-side Electron and Proton Transfer Reactions. In: Fromme P, editor. Photosynthetic Protein Complexes: A Structural Approach. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH; 2008. pp. 155–179. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cramer WA, Zhang H. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2006;1757:339–345. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2006.04.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zhang H, Primak A, Cape J, Bowman MK, Kramer DM, Cramer WA. Biochemistry. 2004;43:16329–16336. doi: 10.1021/bi048363p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Traylor TG, Sharma VS. Biochemistry. 1992;31:2847–2850. doi: 10.1021/bi00126a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hoshino M, Ozawa K, Seki H, Ford PC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993;115:9568–9575. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gomez de Gracia A, Bordes L, Desbois A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:17634–17643. doi: 10.1021/ja052791g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yeh C-Y, Chang CJ, Nocera DG. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001;123:1513–1514. doi: 10.1021/ja003245k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cheng B, Safo MK, Orosz RD, Reed CA, Debrunner PG, Scheidt WR. Inorg. Chem. 1994;33:1319–1324. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Diner B, Mauzerall D. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1973;305:329–352. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(73)90180-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bennoun P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1982;79:4352–4356. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.14.4352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Cournac L, Redding K, Ravenel J, Rumeau D, Josse EM, Kuntz M, Peltier G. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:17256–17262. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M908732199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Peltier G, Cournac L. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 2002;53:523–550. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.53.100301.135242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Cardol P, Bailleul B, Rappaport F, Derelle E, Beal D, Breyton C, Bailey S, Wollman FA, Grossman A, Moreau H, Finazzi G. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008;105:7881–7886. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0802762105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bailey S, Melis A, Mackey KR, Cardol P, Finazzi G, van Dijken G, Berg GM, Arrigo K, Shrager J, Grossman A. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2008;1777:269–276. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2008.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ogawa T, Mi H. Photosynth. Res. 2007;93:69–77. doi: 10.1007/s11120-006-9128-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Eberhard S, Finazzi G, Wollman FA. Ann. Rev. Genet. 2008;42:463–515. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.42.110807.091452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.