Abstract
Background
We have identified a cytosine-adenosine (CA) repeat length polymorphism in the 5′-regulatory region of the human integrin α2 gene ITGA2 that begins at −605. Our objective was to establish the contribution of this polymorphism to the regulation of integrin α2β1 expression, which is known to vary several-fold among normal individuals, and to investigate the underlying mechanism(s).
Methodology/Principal Findings
In combination with the SNP C-52T, previously identified by us as a binding site for the transcription factor Sp1, four ITGA2 haplotypes can be distinguished, in the order in which they enhance ITGA2 transcription: (CA)12/-52C>(CA)11/-52C>(CA)11/-52T>(CA)10/-52T. By DNA affinity chromatography and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays, we show that poly (ADP-ribose)polymerase-1 (PARP-1) and Ku80/70 bind specifically and with enhanced affinity to the longer (CA)12 repeat alleles.
Conclusions/Significance
The increased binding of PARP-1 and Ku80/70, known components of transcription co-activator complexes, to the longer (CA)12 alleles of ITGA2 coincides with enhanced α2β1 expression. The most likely explanation for these findings is that PARP-1 and Ku80/70 contribute to the transcriptional regulation of ITGA2. These observations provide new insight into the mechanisms(s) underlying haplotype-dependent variability in integrin α2β1 expression in human platelets and other cells.
Introduction
The fact that cellular integrin α2β1 levels can vary up to ten-fold among normal, healthy subjects was first discovered on blood platelets [1], [2], where it leads to variation in adhesive function. Among patients with a genetic basis for impaired hemostasis or an increased propensity for thrombosis, differences in α2β1 can further influence risk for negative outcomes [3], [4], [5], [6]. However, the integrin α2β1 is expressed by a large variety of cell types, and comparable variation has now been observed in, for example, fibroblasts and keratinocytes, where it may have an impact on wound healing or other physiologic functions [7]. The genetic basis for this heritable variation has been the subject of a comprehensive study by our lab, and progress has been made in understanding the variety of mechanisms, some species-dependent [8], that control expression of this integrin.
We [1], [2] previously identified and characterized an ITGA2 proximal promoter polymorphism at -52 (C-52T) that decreases significantly the binding of the transcription factor Sp1, known to be a key enhancer of ITGA2 transcription [9]. A T at position -52 disrupts what is otherwise a highly favorable Sp1 binding site and decreases its binding by 8–10 fold [2]. This SNP, in linkage disequilibrium with two coding region SNPs, C807T [10], [11] and G1648A [12] defines five common and several rare ITGA2 haplotypes [13].
The existence of variability in CA repeat length at this position in the ITGA2 promoter was originally reported in abstract form by Sydor et al. [14], but not precisely defined. In the present report, we define the CA repeat length polymorphism as 10 to 12 repeats with the 3′ sequence beginning at −605, we show that it is in linkage disequilibrium with C-52T based on an analysis of 132 human chromosomes, and we analyze its contribution to transcription vis-à-vis C-52T in megakaryocytic (MK) and non-megakaryocytic (non-MK) cell lines.
Results
5′-Regulatory Region CA Repeat Sequence
In this study, we have identified a polymorphic CA repeat sequence that begins at position −605 within the 5′-regulatory region of ITGA2 (encompassing position 2878903 to 2878924 of NCBI NT_006713). Based on the sequence of 132 human chromosomes, there are three predominant alleles, and the frequency of each in a white, non-Hispanic population is: (CA)10 = 0.072; (CA)11 = 0.567; and (CA)12 = 0.361. A rare (CA)13 allele was detected only on two chromosomes. A comparison of these 132 human haplotypes confirmed complete linkage disequilibrium between -52C and (CA)12 and between -52T and (CA)10 (Chi-square = 80.016; p<0.001) ( Table 1 ).
Table 1. Association of CA repeat length alleles with -52 C or -52T on 132 human chromosomes.
| CA Repeat Length | ||||
| 10 | 11 | 12 | ||
| -52 | C | 0* | 17 | 48 |
| T | 16 | 51 | 0 | |
number of chromosomes positive for both alleles.
An obvious question is whether this modest variation in CA repeat length might have an influence on ITGA2 transcription, independently of -52C/T (nucleotide 2879425 in NT_006713). To address this question, we cloned a 1.8 Kb segment of the ITGA2 5′-regulatory/promoter region (bp −1793 through +56) into the LUC reporter plasmid pgl2b.
To analyze the combined effect of the CA repeat polymorphism and C-52T, six variants of the 1.8 Kb segment were created, each bearing 10, 11 or 12 CA repeats at the −605 site and either T or C at position -52. The relative activity of these constructs was measured in three human cell lines with very different backgrounds: HEK293, a human embryonic kidney epithelial cell line; HeLa, a cervical cancer cell line; and Dami, a human megakaryocytic cell line ( Figure 1 ).
Figure 1. Transcriptional activity of ITGA2 promoter-luciferase reporter constructs transfected into HEK293, HeLa, or Dami cells.
A luciferase reporter assay was used to compare transcriptional activity in the presence of -52C (white bars) or -52T (black bars) within the ITGA2 5′-regulatory region (from −1793 to +56) containing (CA)10 (10), (CA)11 (11) or (CA)12 (12) repeat sequences (abscissa). The plasmid vector (p) lacking an insert served as a baseline (negative) control. Relative luciferase activity is indicated on the ordinate. The mean ± SD of three experiments is represented.
In the context of -52C (white bars), overall transcriptional activity was increased, as expected. In HEK293, mean luciferase activity in the presence of the (CA)12 repeat is 1.5- and 2.7-fold higher than that obtained in the presence of the (CA)11 and (CA)10 repeat, respectively. In Dami cells, the corresponding increases, 1.8- and 5.3-fold, are more dramatic. In HeLa cells, the equivalent increases are 1.6-fold and 8.1-fold.
In the context of -52T (black bars), overall transcriptional activity was significantly attenuated in all cell lines ( Figure 1 ). The presence of the (CA)12 repeat still had an incremental effect on luciferase activity in Dami cells, with 1.2- fold and 4.3-fold increases relative to that observed with the (CA)11 or (CA)10 repeat, respectively. On the other hand, in either HEK293 or HeLa cells, there was no increase in luciferase activity between the (CA)12 repeat and the (CA)11 repeat, and only a modest increase in activity relative to the (CA)10 repeat (1.8- and 2.2-fold, respectively).
Taken together, these results indicate that the CA repeat sequence of itself has little effect on transcriptional activity under conditions where Sp1 binding would be minimized (in the presence of -52T). On the other hand, when Sp1-driven transcription is optimized by the presence of -52C, increasing CA repeat length enhances that activity.
Association of CA Repeat Number with Platelet α2β1 Expression
We obtained the strongest confirmation of an effect of CA repeat length on ITGA2 expression by measuring the level of platelet surface α2β1 ( Figure 2A ) in comparison to the level of platelet αIIbβ3 ( Figure 2B ) between normal subjects with known ITGA2 haplotypes. To simplify the analysis, donors were selected who are homozygous for both CA repeat length and the C-52T allele; to minimize any effect of sample manipulation, platelet surface α2β1 content was measured in whole blood, as previously described [10].
Figure 2. Platelet α2β1 surface expression measured by flow cytometry in whole blood.
The geometric mean fluorescence intensity (GMFI) is plotted on the ordinate. A. Surface content of integrin α2β1 was measured by the binding of murine monoclonal antibody 12F1. B. Expression of integrin αIIbβ3 was measured by the binding of murine monoclonal antibody AP2. Blood was analyzed from donors who are homozygous for the following ITGA2 haplotypes: (CA)12/-52C (12 C) (n = 21); (CA)11/-52C (11 C) (n = 14); (CA)11/-52T (11 T) (n = 27); and (CA)10/-52T (10 T) (n = 8). For each dataset in these box plots, the broad horizontal bar represents the median, the box represents the second and third quartiles, and the vertical line represents the range. In A, all pair wise comparisons are statistically significant (p<0.001); in B, all pair wise comparisons are not statistically significant (p>0.95). Comparable results were obtained with murine monoclonal antibodies 6F1 and 8C12, specific for integrin α2β1 (not shown).
The data are presented as box plots to present the maximum amount of statistical information in a visual format. Donors are grouped into four datasets, comparing donors homozygous for (CA)12 and -52C (n = 21), for (CA)11 and -52C (n = 14); for (CA)11 and -52T (n = 27); and for (CA)10 and -52T (n = 8). The descriptive statistics are summarized in Table 2 . First, the levels of platelet integrin αIIbβ3 were virtually identical between groups ( Figure 2B ) (p>0.98). On the other hand, the level of integrin α2β1 measured with 12F1 declined progressively with decreasing CA repeat length and the presence of -52T ( Figure 2A ). The same findings were made with 6F1 and 8C12 ( Table 2 ). All pair-wise comparisons for each monoclonal antibody are statistically significant (p<0.05). These results strongly support the notion that the CA repeat length polymorphism has an independent influence on the rate of ITGA2 transcription.
Table 2. Surface content of platelet integrins α2β1 and αIIbβ3 measured in whole blood by flow cytometry.
| 12F1 | 6F1 | 8C12 | AP2 | |||||||
| CA | -52 | n | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD |
| 12 | C | 21 | 13.7* | 1.3 | 16.4 | 1.9 | 23.1 | 2.5 | 267.5 | 26.3 |
| 11 | C | 14 | 11.7 | 1.5 | 13.4 | 2.1 | 16.0 | 2.4 | 270.4 | 26.1 |
| 11 | T | 27 | 10.2 | 1.4 | 11.2 | 1.3 | 13.7 | 1.6 | 267.2 | 23.3 |
| 10 | T | 8 | 7.1 | 0.7 | 8.2 | 0.7 | 9.5 | 0.8 | 269.3 | 26.7 |
Geometric Mean Fluorescence Intensity (GMFI).
The background GMFI obtained with isotype-matched non-immune mouse IgG has been subtracted from these values.
Integrin α2β1 specific antibodies are 12F1, 6F1 and 8C12. AP2 is specific for integrin αIIbβ3.
Identification of Proteins That Bind the CA Repeat Sequence In Vitro
We used oligonucleotide affinity chromatography to capture proteins that bind to the (CA)12 repeat sequence in vitro ( Figure 3 ). To eliminate non-specific binding, we performed the affinity chromatography in the presence of an excess of calf thymus DNA, as recommended by Kadonaga et al. [15]. Oligonucleotide/protein complexes were immobilized with streptavidin-Sepharose, and bound proteins were eluted from the oligonucleotide by addition of SDS and heating and then separated by SDS-PAGE ( Figure 3A ). The initial nuclear extract is depicted in lane 1. In the absence of calf thymus DNA, several proteins were complexed with biotin-CA12 (lane 2), including two prominent proteins with MWapp of 120 kDa (arrow a) and 80 kDa (arrow b). In the presence of calf thymus DNA, the same two proteins were still complexed with Biotin-CA12 (lane 3). The addition of a five-fold excess of control oligonucleotide together with Biotin-CA12 (lane 4) did not inhibit the binding of the 120 and 80 kDa proteins to Biotin-CA12. Finally, neither of these two proteins was complexed to the control oligonucleotide alone (lane 5).
Figure 3. Identification of proteins that bind to the (CA)12 oligonucleotide sequence in vitro.
A. One mg of Dami nuclear extract protein was incubated with one of four biotinylated (CA)12 oligonucleotide probes in binding buffer. Oligonucleotide/protein complexes were adsorbed to streptavidin-agarose beads, and the bound proteins were eluted, separated by SDS-PAGE and visualized using silver stain. The following protein samples are depicted: (lane1) Starting nuclear extract; (lane 2) Proteins bound to CA12 in the absence of calf thymus DNA; (lane 3) Proteins bound to CA12 in the presence of calf thymus DNA; (lane 4); Proteins bound to CA12 in the presence of calf thymus DNA+ 5-fold molar excess of control oligonucleotide; and (lane 5) Proteins bound to control oligonucleotide in the presence of calf thymus DNA. The two prominent protein bands with MWApp of 120 kDa and 80 kDa (positions indicated by arrows a and b, respectively, to the right of the panel) were excised and processed by MS/MS. Peptides recovered and sequenced by MS/MS are depicted in Figure S1. The positions held by molecular weight standards (Amersham Biosciences, Pittsburgh, PA) are indicated to the left of the panel. B. Dami nuclear extract proteins were incubated in vitro with the biotin-conjugated oligonucleotide probes: CA12, CA11, CA10 or control oligonucleotide (C). The resultant oligonucleotide/protein complexes were pulled down with streptavidin agarose. Nuclear proteins present in the complexes were separated by SDS-PAGE and identified by western blotting using the specific antibodies indicated to the left of the figure. The presence of PARP-1, Ku80 and Ku70 was confirmed in this manner. Antibodies specific for Sp1 served as a negative control, since the oligonucleotides used in these assays does not contain the Sp1 binding site. To confirm comparable oligonucleotide loading, the same samples were electrophoresed in a 2% agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide (probes; negative image).
MS/MS. The 120 and 80 kDa protein bands were individually extracted from the gel and subjected to tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). Based on electrophoretic mobility and the results of MS/MS, the two bands were identified as PARP-1 (120kDa) and Ku80 (80 kDa) (Figure S1).
The identities of the proteins present in purified biotin-CA12/protein complexes were confirmed by western blot, using antibodies specific for PARP-1, Ku80, Ku70, and Sp1 ( Figure 3B ). Ku70 (70 kDa), although not visible in the silver -stained gel in Figure 3A , is known to form a heterodimer with Ku80. Sp1, which is not present in any of the oligonucleotide/protein complexes, is not expected to bind to these CA repeat sequences and serves as a negative control. None of these proteins were detected in complexes formed with biotin-CA11, biotin-CA10 or the control oligonucleotide ( Figure 3B ).
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP)
We used the ChIP assay to confirm that the co-activator protein complex is formed at the CA repeat sequence in vivo ( Figure 4 ). We selected established cell lines that are homozygous for (CA)12 or (CA)11, but we have not yet identified a cell line that is homozygous for (CA)10. The HEK293 and U937 cell lines are both homozygous for the (CA)12 repeat, while HeLa cells are homozygous for the (CA)11 repeat. However, the U937 cell line serves as a negative control, because it is devoid of detectable α2β1 mRNA, even though it bears the ITGA2 (CA)12 repeat. Previous results indicate that the U937 ITGA2 promoter region is hypermethylated at CpG sites and transcriptionally silent [16].
Figure 4. Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP).
A. Confirmation of protein composition by Western Blot. The presence of (top row to bottom row) PARP-1, Ku70, Ku80, and integrin α2 in HEK293 cells, which express the ITGA2 (CA)12 allele, HeLa cells, which express the ITGA2 (CA)11 allele, or U937 cells, which do not express ITGA2, was confirmed by western blotting. The relative content of each protein in these three cell lines was comparable, except for the integrin α2, which is expressed at reduced levels in HeLa cells, and is absent in U937 cells. B. ChIP assays were performed using HEK293 cells (top row), HeLa cells (center row) and the control cell line U937 (bottom row). U937 bears the ITGA2 (CA)12 allele, but does not express any detectable ITGA2 mRNA, as determined by PCR (data not shown). Chromatin was sheared by sonication, and protein-DNA complexes were immunoprecipitated with antibodies against the PARP-1 or Ku80. The leftmost column represents 5% of total cross-linked chromatin before immunoprecipitation (5% input). Non-immune goat IgG served as a negative control (IgG control.). DNA retrieved after washing was amplified with primers specific for the test sequence encompassing the ITGA2 CA repeat region (beginning at nucleotide −708 and ending at nucleotide −552). Data from one experiment representative of three independent experiments are depicted. C. ChIP assays were performed exactly as in B, except that primers specific for a 3′-UTR negative control sequence were utilized. D. Semi-quantitation of PARP-1 and Ku80 bound to CA repeat sequences in vivo. The results of three ChIP assays such as that depicted in Figure 4B were analyzed semi-quantitatively. The relative binding of PARP-1 or Ku80 to the HEK 293 CA12 compared to HeLa CA11 sites is plotted on the ordinate as the fold-increase in density (HEK293/HeLa) of the photographic images corresponding to the amplified DNA sequences. Image densities were calculated using ImageJ software.
By western blot assays ( Figure 4A ), comparable levels of PARP-1, Ku80 and Ku70 are detected in nuclear extracts of HEK293, HeLa or U937 cells. On the other hand, the level of integrin α2 is consistently higher in membrane extracts from HEK293 cells (roughly, 2-fold), relative to that found in HeLa cells, and absent from U937.
By ChIP, Ku80 and PARP-1 are specifically bound in situ to the (CA)12 site of HEK293 cells but associate much less strongly with the (CA)11 site of HeLa and do not associate with the (CA)12 of U937 ( Figure 4B ). In contrast, neither PARP-1 nor Ku80 bound to the negative control sequenced derived from the 3′-UTR ( Figure 4C ). As shown in Figure 4D , a semi-quantitative analysis based on three experiments indicates that there is, on average, a four-fold increase in bound PARP-1 and a six-fold increase in bound Ku80 at the HEK293 (CA)12 site relative to the HeLa (CA)11 site.
Discussion
In this study, we have observed that an increase in the length of a CA repeat polymorphism in the 5′-regulatory region of ITGA2 (beginning at −605) correlates with an increase in ITGA2 transcription and a corresponding increase in the levels of platelet α2β1. This ITGA2 CA repeat polymorphism and the downstream sequence -52C that enhances Sp1 binding are in linkage disequilibrium.
The results of a luciferase reporter system clearly show that the length of the CA repeat correlates with the rate of transcription in synergy with the previously defined SNP at -52. The level of reporter activity increases when one compares the (CA)11 repeat to the (CA)10 sequence, but activity is most significantly enhanced in the presence of the (CA)12 repeat. Thus, four haplotypes can be distinguished, in the order in which they enhance ITGA2 transcription: (CA)12/-52C>(CA)11/-52C>(CA)11/-52T>(CA)10/-52T.
In vivo confirmation of this relationship was obtained with blood platelets, in which the level of integrin α2β1 content correlates directly with the length of the CA repeat sequence in ITGA2. The combination of the CA repeat polymorphism and the -52 C/T SNP can readily account for the 3–4 fold variation in α2β1 expression that we have previously reported [1], [10] and confirm here.
Important information concerning the molecular basis for this effect was obtained by DNA affinity chromatography and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) analyses, whereby we show that PARP-1 and Ku80/70 bind specifically and most strongly to the (CA)12 repeat allele. The enhanced binding of PARP-1 and Ku80/70, known components of transcription co-activator complexes, with this allele of ITGA2 suggests that both proteins are involved in the increased expression of α2β1 in platelets or other cells from donors who express the( CA)12 repeat allele. This novel finding provides new insight into an understanding of haplotype-dependent variability in integrin α2β1 expression.
PARP-1 binds to double-stranded DNA nicks, becomes activated, cleaves NAD+ into nicotinamide ADP-ribose, and polymerizes ADP-ribose on various nuclear proteins, including histones, certain transcription factors, such as Sp1, and itself [17]. This mechanism of poly ADP-ribosylation has been shown to contribute to various cellular processes, including DNA repair [18], transcriptional regulation [19], [20], [21], and cell cycle progression [21]. Ku80 and Ku70 form the heterodimeric DNA binding complex Ku80/70 that associates with PARP-1 and, among other functions, contributes to the regulation of gene transcription [22], [23], [24], [25], [26].
This study is the first to document that the presence of a CA repeat sequence that facilitates and/or enhances the specific binding of the PARP-1/Ku80/70 complex. Previously defined consensus Ku80/70 binding sites are GAGAAAGA [27], [28] or AAAAGGAAA and others [29]. These sequences are not present anywhere within 10 Kb of the 5′-regulatory region of ITGA2. Conversely, we are unaware of any previous report that CA repeats are a preferred binding sequence for either PARP-1 or Ku80/70.
Our study is not the first instance of a functional association between PARP-1 and integrin genes. Regulation of the expression of another integrin, αLβ2 (LFA-1; CD11a) by PARP-1 [30] may be implicated in the response to cellular damage by oxygen radicals or ischemia in neurons. Microglial migration is strongly controlled in living brain tissue by expression of this integrin, which is regulated by the formation of a nuclear PARP–1/NF-κB-protein complex. In addition, β1 integrin engagement by specific antibodies has been shown to enhance histone H3 acetylation in the mouse lung endothelial cell genome through a mechanism that requires PARP-1 [31].
Materials and Methods
Monoclonal Antibodies and Reagents
Murine monoclonal IgG antibody 6F1 (anti-α2β1) has been described [32] and is a gift from Dr. B. Coller (Rockefeller University, New York, NY). The murine hybridoma 12F1 producing IgG specific for α2β1 has been well characterized [33] and was generously provided by Dr V. Woods (University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA). The murine monoclonal IgG antibody 8C12, also specific for α2β1, was a gift from Dr. M. Ginsberg (University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA). AP2 is a murine monoclonal IgG antibody specific for the integrin αIIbβ3 developed and characterized in our laboratory [34]. Goat anti-human Ku80, goat anti-human PARP-1, rabbit anti-human Sp1, normal goat IgG and normal rabbit IgG were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). The human megakaryocytic cell line Dami was obtained as previously described [2], and the human cell lines HeLa and HEK293 were obtained from ATCC (Manassas, VA).
Measurement of Platelet Integrin Expression in Whole Blood by Flow Cytometry
Platelets were obtained from whole blood, as previously described [35], with prior informed consent and IRB approval. Murine monoclonal antibodies specific for the integrin α2β1 complex, 6F1, 12F1, and 8C12, were used to quantitate levels of this receptor on platelets by flow cytometry. Monoclonal antibody AP2 was employed to quantitate the integrin αIIbβ3. Each murine monoclonal antibody (0.5 µg in 10 µl PBS 7.4) was added to a 100 µl aliquot of whole blood anticoagulated with sodium citrate and let stand at ambient temperature for 60 minutes with constant, gentle mixing. FITC-F(ab′)2 goat anti-mouse IgG (heavy and light chains; Zymed) was then added (50 µl of a 1∶500 dilution), and the mixture let stand for an additional 30 minutes at ambient temperature with mixing. The mixtures were then diluted 1∶10 with PBS 7.4 and bound fluorescence was analyzed in a FACStar Plus (Beckman-Dickinson). Platelets were gated by forward versus side scatter, and the geometric mean fluorescence intensity (GMFI) of bound 12F1, 8C12, AP2, or nonimmune murine IgG was determined. The GMFI obtained for 12F1, 6F1, 8C12 or AP2 was corrected by subtracting from each the GMFI for nonimmune IgG.
The mean and standard deviation for GMFI values from each dataset were calculated. A Kruskal-Wallis one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) on ranks and a pairwise multiple comparison procedure (Holm-Sidak method) were used to determine the statistical significance of differences between means of each group.
Plasmid Construction
A 1.9 Kb segment of the ITGA2 5′-regulatory/promoter region corresponding to nucleotides −1793 through +56 was amplified using genomic DNA as template and the primer pair:
Human A2.F = 5′-ATTAATGTGAGGCAG GAGTT-3′; and
Human A2.R = 5′-GAGGTTTGCAGAGGA TAC-3′.
Variants of this 5′-regulatory/promoter region construct were generated using the QuickChange II site-directed mutagenesis kit from Stratagene (La Jolla, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was catalyzed by Platinum Taq high fidelity (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The amplicon was cloned into TOPO TA PCR2.1 vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), according to the manufacturer's directions, and subcloned into the pGl2 basic vector (Promega, Madison, WI) at the KpnI and XhoI restriction sites.
Cell Culture
Dami cells were grown in Iscove's modified medium supplemented with 10% (v/v) horse serum and 1% (v/v) Antibiotic-Antimycotic (Gibco-Invitrogen, Inc., Carlsbad, CA). HeLa and HEK293 cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% (v/v) Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS), 2 mM L-Glutamine and 1% (v/v) Antibiotic-Antimycotic (Gibco-Invitrogen, Inc.). In the case of HEK293 or HeLa, 5×104 cells in 500 µl of medium were added to each well of a 24-well microtiter plate together with 200 ng of the pGl2 construct and 20 ng of the vector pRL-TK (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI). Transfection was initiated using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), according to manufacturer's instructions. For Dami cells, 5×104 cells in 350 µl of medium were added to one well of a 24-well plate together with 200 ng of the pGl2 construct and 20 ng of the pRL-TK vector. Transfection was initiated by addition of Effectene (Qiagen, Valencia CA), as previously described [36]. Dual luciferase assays (Promega) were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. Luciferase activities were measured with the Clarity Luminescence Microplate Reader (Bio-Tek Instruments, Winooski, VE), and firefly luciferase activities were normalized to Renilla luciferase activities.
Oligonucleotide Affinity Chromatography
All procedures were performed at 4°C. Nuclear extracts (1 mg total protein) in 1 ml of 25 mM Hepes, pH 7.8, containing 12.5 mM MgCl2, 2 mM dithiothreitol, 20% (vol/vol) Nonidet P-40 and 0.1 M KCl (Hepes buffer), as described by Kadonaga et al. [15], combined with sonicated calf thymus DNA (100 µg in 10 µl Hepes buffer), incubated for 10–15 minutes, and pre-cleared by adsorption with Streptavidin-agarose beads (Amersham, Piscataway, NJ) equilibrated in the same buffer. The agarose beads were pelleted by centrifugation, and the supernatants were combined with one of four double-stranded biotinylated-oligonucleotide probes in the same buffer for 1 hour on ice. The four oligonucleotide probes synthesized for this purpose were: the putative target sequence, Biotin-5′-TCTGT(CA)12GCT-3′ (CA12), Biotin-5′-TCTGT(CA)11GCTCT-3′ (CA11), Biotin-5′-TCTGT(CA)10GCTCTTG-3′ (CA10) and the negative control, Biotin-5′-TCTGT(CA)5GTGT(CA)5GCT-3′ (Control). The oligonucleotide/protein complexes were adsorbed to pre-blocked Streptavidin-agarose, and incubated for 30 min. The beads were then washed three times by successive incubation for 10 min in 2 ml buffer and centrifugation. After the final wash, the beads were pelleted, warmed to ambient temperature and resuspended in electrophoresis buffer containing 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS). Bound proteins were eluted by heating the samples for 30 min at 60°C. Eluted proteins were separated by SDS- polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), as previously described [10], and visualized using the SilverXpress staining kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Protein identification was confirmed by subsequent western blot assays.
Western Blot
Proteins in polyacrylamide slab gels separated by SDS-PAGE were transferred electrophoretically to a nitrocellulose membrane [10]. Membranes were blocked, immersed in a solution containing the primary antibody for 2 hours at room temperature, washed with gentle agitation, incubated in a solution containing the secondary antibody (diluted 1/5000) for 45 minutes at room temperature, and washed. Bound antibody was visualized by chemiluminescence.
Mass Spectrometry
DNA affinity chromatography was performed with oligonucleotide CA12. Proteins were stained with the bio-safe-Coomassie blue staining kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA), according to the manufacturer's instructions, and the two prominent bands with apparent molecular weights (MWapp) of 120 and 80 kilodaltons (kDa) were excised for identification.
Tryptic peptide mixtures were analyzed by microcapillary reverse phase chromatography coupled to an LCQ Deca XP MAX ion-trap mass spectrometer (ThermoFinnigan, San Jose, CA) using dynamic exclusion with MS/MS. Mass spectrometer was fully automated during the entire procedure using the Xcalibur 1.4 software system (ThermoFinnigan). Peptide identification was established using Bioworks browser version 3.1 (ThermoFinnigan) based on human databases.
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) Assay
The details of ChIP assays are provided in the Supplemental materials (File S1).
Supporting Information
Identification of proteins that bind to the (CA)12 oligonucleotide sequence in vitro by mass spectrometry. One hundred µg of Dami nuclear extract protein were incubated with the biotinylated (CA)12 oligonucleotide probe in binding buffer. DNA-protein complexes were adsorbed (pulled down) with streptavidin agarose beads, and the bound proteins were eluted, separated by SDS-PAGE and visualized using silver stain. Two higher MWApp protein bands (Band 1 and Band 2) were excised and processed by MS/MS. The Peptides recovered and sequenced by MS/MS are depicted. For each peptide sequence, the minimal cross correlation score (XC) and charge (Z) are displayed. XC is the confidence for identification according to the charge for the peptide recovered. Peptides in the upper list recovered from Band 1 identify it as PARP-1. Peptides in the lower list recovered from Band 2 and identify it as Ku80.
(0.41 MB TIF)
Supplemental Materials
(0.04 MB DOC)
Acknowledgments
This is manuscript #18767-MEM from The Scripps Research Institute.
Footnotes
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Funding: This study was supported by grants HL075821 and HL086904 from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute awarded to TJK. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Jacquelin B, Tarantino MD, Kritzik M, Rozenshteyn D, Koziol JA, et al. Allele-dependent transcriptional regulation of the human integrin alpha 2 gene. Blood. 2001;97:1721–1726. doi: 10.1182/blood.v97.6.1721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jacquelin B, Rozenshteyn D, Kanaji S, Koziol JA, Nurden AT, et al. Characterization of Inherited Differences in Transcription of the Human Integrin alpha 2 Gene. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:23518–23524. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M102019200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kunicki TJ, Federici AB, Salomon DR, Koziol JA, Head SR, et al. An association of candidate gene haplotypes and bleeding severity in Von Willebrand Disease (VWD) type 1 pedigrees. Blood. 2004;104:2359–2367. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-01-0349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Santoso S, Kunicki TJ, Kroll H, Haberbosch W, Gardemann A. Association of the platelet glycoprotein Ia C 807 T gene polymorphism with myocardial infarction in younger patients. Blood. 1999;93:2449–2453. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Reiner AP, Kumar PN, Schwartz SM, Longstreth WT, Jr, Pearce RM, et al. Genetic variants of platelet glycoprotein receptors and risk of stroke in young women. Stroke. 2000;31:1628–1633. doi: 10.1161/01.str.31.7.1628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Reiner AP, Agardh E, Teramura G, Gaur P, Gaur LK, et al. Diabetes duration may modify the association between genetic variation in the glycoprotein Ia subunit of the platelet collagen receptor and risk of severe diabetic retinopathy: a working hypothesis. Thromb Haemost. 2003;89:142–148. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Eckes B, Zweers MC, Zhang ZG, Hallinger R, Mauch C, et al. Mechanical Tension and Integrin alpha2beta1 Regulate Fibroblast Functions. J Invest Dermatol. 2006;126(Suppl):66–72. doi: 10.1038/sj.jidsymp.5650003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cheli Y, Kunicki TJ. hnRNP L regulates differences in expression of mouse integrin alpha 2 beta 1. Blood. 2006;107:4391–4398. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-12-4822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zutter MM, Santoro SA, Painter AS, Tsung YL, Gafford A. The human alpha 2 integrin gene promoter. Identification of positive and negative regulatory elements important for cell-type and developmentally restricted gene expression. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1994;269:463–469. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kunicki TJ, Kritzik M, Annis DS, Nugent DJ. Hereditary variation in platelet integrin alpha 2 beta 1 copy number is associated with two silent polymorphisms in the alpha 2 gene coding sequence. Blood. 1997;89:1939–1943. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kritzik M, Savage B, Nugent DJ, Santoso S, Ruggeri ZM, et al. Nucleotide polymorphisms in the alpha 2 gene define multiple alleles which are associated with differences in platelet alpha 2 beta 1. Blood. 1998;92:2382–2388. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kalb R, Santoso S, Unkelbach K, Kiefel V, Mueller-Eckhardt C. Localization of the Br polymorphism on a 144 bp Exon of the GPIa gene and its application in platelet DNA typing. Thromb Haemost. 1994;71:651–654. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Di Paola J, Jugessur A, Goldman T, Reiland J, Tallman D, et al. Platelet glycoprotein Ibalpha and integrin alphabeta polymorphisms: gene frequencies and linkage disequilibrium in a population diversity panel. J Thromb Haemost. 2005;3:1511–1521. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2005.01273.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sydor WJ, Sanak M, Bazan-Socha S, Szczeklik A, Musial J. Novel polymorphic short tandem repeat in the human alpha2 integrin gene promoter is associated with GPIa/IIa density on the platelet surface. Journal of Thrombosis & Haemostasis. 2003;1(Suppl.1):P1762 abstract. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kadonaga JT, Tjian R. Affinity purification of sequence-specific DNA binding proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986;83:5889–5893. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.16.5889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cheli Y, Kanaji S, Jacquelin B, Chang M, Nugent DJ, et al. Transcriptional and epigenetic regulation of the integrin collagen receptor locus ITGA1-PELO-ITGA2. Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Struct Expression. 2007;1769:546–558. doi: 10.1016/j.bbaexp.2007.06.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.de Murcia G, Menissier dM. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase: a molecular nick-sensor. Trends Biochem Sci. 1994;19:172–176. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(94)90280-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Le Rhun Y, Kirkland JB, Shah GM. Cellular responses to DNA damage in the absence of Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998;245:1–10. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1998.8257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kannan P, Yu Y, Wankhade S, Tainsky MA. PolyADP-ribose polymerase is a coactivator for AP-2-mediated transcriptional activation. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999;27:866–874. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.3.866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Meisterernst M, Stelzer G, Roeder RG. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase enhances activator-dependent transcription in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:2261–2265. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.6.2261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Simbulan-Rosenthal CM, Ly DH, Rosenthal DS, Konopka G, Luo R, et al. Misregulation of gene expression in primary fibroblasts lacking poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:11274–11279. doi: 10.1073/pnas.200285797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kelavkar UP, Wang S, Badr KF. Ku autoantigen (DNA helicase) is required for interleukins-13/-4-induction of 15-lipoxygenase-1 gene expression in human epithelial cells. Genes Immun. 2000;1:237–250. doi: 10.1038/sj.gene.6363665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.D'Amours D, Desnoyers S, D'Silva I, Poirier GG. Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation reactions in the regulation of nuclear functions. Biochem J. 1999;342 ( Pt 2):249–268. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hassa PO, Hottiger MO. The functional role of poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase 1 as novel coactivator of NF-kappaB in inflammatory disorders. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2002;59:1534–1553. doi: 10.1007/s00018-002-8527-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kraus WL, Lis JT. PARP goes transcription. Cell. 2003;113:677–683. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00433-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Grote J, Koenig S, Ackermann D, Sopalla C, Benedyk M, et al. Identification of poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase-1 and Ku70/Ku80 as transcriptional regulator of S100A9 gene expression. BMC Mol Biol. 2006;7:48. doi: 10.1186/1471-2199-7-48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Giffin W, Kwast-Welfeld J, Rodda DJ, Prefontaine GG, Traykova-Andonova M, et al. Sequence-specific DNA binding and transcription factor phosphorylation by Ku Autoantigen/DNA-dependent protein kinase. Phosphorylation of Ser-527 of the rat glucocorticoid receptor. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:5647–5658. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.9.5647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Torrance H, Giffin W, Rodda DJ, Pope L, Hache RJ. Sequence-specific binding of Ku autoantigen to single-stranded DNA. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:20810–20819. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.33.20810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Schild-Poulter C, Matheos D, Novac O, Cui B, Giffin W, et al. Differential DNA binding of Ku antigen determines its involvement in DNA replication. DNA Cell Biol. 2003;22:65–78. doi: 10.1089/104454903321515887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ullrich O, Diestel A, Eyupoglu IY, Nitsch R. Regulation of microglial expression of integrins by poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1. Nat Cell Biol. 2001;3:1035–1042. doi: 10.1038/ncb1201-1035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rose JL, Huang H, Wray SF, Hoyt DG. Integrin engagement increases histone H3 acetylation and reduces histone H1 association with DNA in murine lung endothelial cells. Mol Pharmacol. 2005;68:439–446. doi: 10.1124/mol.104.010876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Coller BS, Beer JH, Scudder LE, Steinberg MH. Collagen-platelet interactions: evidence for a direct interaction of collagen with platelet GPIa/IIa and an indirect interaction with platelet GPIIb/IIIa mediated by adhesive proteins. Blood. 1989;74:182–192. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Pischel KD, Hemler ME, Huang C, Bluestein HG, Woods VL., Jr Use of the monoclonal antibody 12F1 to characterize the differentiation antigen VLA-2. Journal of Immunology. 1987;138:226. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Pidard D, Montgomery RR, Bennett JS, Kunicki TJ. Interaction of AP-2, a monoclonal antibody specific for human platelet glycoprotein IIb-IIIa complex, with intact platelets. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1983;258:12582–12587. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kunicki TJ, Williams SA, Salomon DR, Harrison P, Crisler P, et al. Genetics of platelet reactivity in normal, healthy individuals. J Thromb Haemost. 2009;7:2116–2122. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03610.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Furihata K, Kunicki TJ. Characterization of human glycoprotein VI gene 5′ regulatory and promoter regions. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002;22:1733–1739. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.0000034493.76465.ff. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Identification of proteins that bind to the (CA)12 oligonucleotide sequence in vitro by mass spectrometry. One hundred µg of Dami nuclear extract protein were incubated with the biotinylated (CA)12 oligonucleotide probe in binding buffer. DNA-protein complexes were adsorbed (pulled down) with streptavidin agarose beads, and the bound proteins were eluted, separated by SDS-PAGE and visualized using silver stain. Two higher MWApp protein bands (Band 1 and Band 2) were excised and processed by MS/MS. The Peptides recovered and sequenced by MS/MS are depicted. For each peptide sequence, the minimal cross correlation score (XC) and charge (Z) are displayed. XC is the confidence for identification according to the charge for the peptide recovered. Peptides in the upper list recovered from Band 1 identify it as PARP-1. Peptides in the lower list recovered from Band 2 and identify it as Ku80.
(0.41 MB TIF)
Supplemental Materials
(0.04 MB DOC)




