Skip to main content
Indian Journal of Dermatology logoLink to Indian Journal of Dermatology
. 2009 Oct-Dec;54(4):347–349. doi: 10.4103/0019-5154.57611

PATTERN OF SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS IN A TERTIARY CARE CENTRE AT PUDUCHERRY

S Abarna Devi 1, T P Vetrichevvel 1, Gajanan A Pise 1, Devinder Mohan Thappa 1,
PMCID: PMC2807711  PMID: 20101336

Abstract

Background:

The prevalence of sexually transmitted infections (STI) varies widely from region to region in our country.

Aims:

To highlight the pattern of STIs and the profile of patients with HIV infection in STD patients as seen at our hospital.

Methods:

A retrospective chart analysis of clients attending STI clinic, JIPMER, Puducherry, from June 2004 to June 2006 was done.

Results:

A total of 866 clients attended our STI clinic, out of whom 435 (50.2%) had proven STI. STIs were more common in men, with a male (290): female (145) ratio of 2:1. Their age ranged from 1 year to 75 years (mean age = 32.38 years) with the maximum number of patients in the age group of 21-30 years, while children constituted only 2.8%. Herpes genitalis (107 patients, 32.8%) was the most common ulcerative STI, while genital wart was the most common nonulcerative STI (56 patients, 17.1%). Non-gonococcal urethritis (46 patients, 14.1%) was more common than gonococcal urethritis. HIV infection was the most common STI in our study, at an alarmingly high rate of 34.5% (151/435). HIV seropositivity was more common in patients who presented with ulcerative STIs than with nonulcerative STIs.

Conclusions:

Herpes genitalis was the most common ulcerative STD, while genital wart was the most common nonulcerative STI in our study. The prevalence of HIV among STI clients in India has been on the rise, but has quite alarmingly become the most common STI in our study.

Keywords: Herpes genitalis, HIV infection, pattern, sexually transmitted infections

Introduction

The prevalence of sexually transmitted infections (STI) varies widely from region to region in our country. A systematic, regional periodic synopsis of the prevalence of STIs among STI clinic attendees would not only help to study the changing trends of STIs, but also to assess the effectiveness of control programs. During the past decade, there is overwhelming evidence that both ulcerative and nonulcerative STIs promote HIV transmission by augmenting HIV infectiousness and susceptibility.[1] An increasing trend of HIV seropositivity among the STI patients prompted us to analyze this relation. This study highlights the pattern of STIs and the profile of patients with HIV infection in STI patients as seen at our hospital for a period of 2 years.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective chart analysis of clients attending STI clinic, JIPMER, Puducherry, from June 2004 to June 2006 was done. The diagnosis was based on clinical history, examination, and relevant laboratory investigations. HIV antibody testing and VDRL test were done in all patients after due consent.

Results

A total of 866 clients had attended our STI clinic, out of whom 435 (50.2%) had proven STI. A majority of them (355 patients, 81.6%) were from the adjoining areas of Tamil Nadu, while 71 patients (16.3%) were from Puducherry. STIs were more common in men, with a male (290): female (145) ratio of 2:1. Their age ranged from 1 year to 75 years (mean age = 32.38 years) with the maximum number of patients in the age group of 21-30 years [Table 1], while children constituted only 2.8%. The predominant mode of contact was heterosexual (397 patients, 89.6%) followed by bisexual (20 patients, 4.6%), and homosexual (7 patients, 1.6%). A history of unprotected sexual intercourse with a commercial sex worker (CSW) was elicited in 69.7% of the patients. Only 8.34% of STI patients had reported consistent use of condoms during their non-marital sexual encounters. Herpes genitalis (107 patients, 32.8%) was the most common ulcerative STI, while genital wart was the most common nonulcerative STI (56 patients, 17.1%). Non-gonococcal urethritis (46 patients, 14.1%) was more common than gonococcal urethritis [Table 2].

Table 1.

Age-wise distribution of STI patients

Age Sex Total (%)

Male (%) Female (%)
0-10 7 (1.6) 3 (0.7) 10 (2.3)
11-20 16 (3.7) 10 (2.3) 26 (6.0)
21-30 107 (24.6) 64 (14.7) 171 (39.3)
31-40 90 (20.7) 50 (11.5) 140 (32.2)
41-50 46 (10.6) 17 (3.9) 63 (14.5)
51-60 18 (4.1) 1 (0.2) 19 (4.4)
61-70 4 (0.9) 0 4 (0.9)
71-80 2 (0.5) 0 2 (0.5)
Total 290 (66.7) 145 (33.3) 435 (100)

STI = Sexually transmitted infections

Table 2.

Profile of STD patients

Diagnosis Sex Total (%)

Male (%) Female (%)
Ulcerative
 Herpes genitalis 80 (24.5) 27 (8.9) 107 (32.8)
 Syphilis 24 (7.3) 14 (4.3) 38 (11.6)
 LGV 3 (0.9) 3 (0.9) 6 (1.8)
 Chancroid 0 5 (1.8) 5 (1.8)
 Non-specific ulcer 14 (4.3) 5 (1.8) 19 (5.82)
Non-ulcerative
 Genital warts 36 (11) 20 (6.1) 56 (17.1)
 Genital molluscum contagiosum 6 (1.8) 3 (0.9) 9 (2.76)
Urethritis
 Gonococcal 6 (1.8) 0 6 (1.8)
 Non-gonococcal (NGU) 46 (14.1) 0 46 (14.1)
Others
 Vulvo vaginal 0 22 (6.7) 22 (6.7)
 candidiasis (VVC)
 Bacterial vaginosis 0 12 (3.68) 12 (3.68)
Total 215 (65.95) 111 (34.04) 326 (100)

HIV infection was the most common STI in our study, at an alarmingly high rate of 34.5% (151/435). A majority of these cases were in the age group of 21-30 years (39.1%) with a male: female ratio of 1.6: 1. Among patients with HIV seropositivity, the predominant mode of contact was heterosexual (138 patients, 91.4%), followed by bisexual (5 patients, 3.6%), and homosexual (2 patients, 1.2%). Seventy six percent of the HIV positive men had a history of contact with a CSW. HIV seropositivity was more common in patients who presented with ulcerative STIs than with nonulcerative STIs [Table 3]. Other symptomatic presentations of HIV seropositive patients included extensive oral candiasis (14 patients), scabies (8), constitutional symptoms (8), pruritic papular dermatosis (8), multidermatomal herpes zoster (5), extensive tinea corporis (5), and others (11). HIV seropositivity among STI clients presenting for voluntary testing (asymptomatic at presentation) was 21.7%, which formed one-third of our HIV patients.

Table 3.

Profile of HIV among STD patients

Concomitant STD No. of patients (%)
Ulcerative
 Herpes genitalis 13 (8.6)
 Syphilis 7 (4.63)
 Chancroid 2 (1.32)
 Herpes genitalis+chancroid 1 (0.66)
Others
 Genital warts 11 (7.28)
 Gonorrhea 1 (0.66)
 Non-gonococcal urethritis 3 (1.98)
 Vulvo vaginal candidiasis 4 (2.64)

Discussion

Nearly half of our study population had one diagnosed STI. Although the epidemiology of STIs is male dominated, there is a gradual trend toward an increase in female attendees in STI clinic as evident in previous studies.[2,3] Even in our institute this changing proportion is reflected in the male: female ratio dropping from 3.7:1 in 1984 to 2:1 in the present study.[4] This could be attributed to effective contact tracing, spouse screening, and improved health care-seeking behavior in women, thanks to increasing female literacy rate.

STIs among teenagers have been reported to be as high as 24% by Chaudary et al. Arora et al., and Singh et al., but studies from our institute have mostly reported a lesser prevalence (6-12%), including the present study.[46] In our study, it was found that the majority of cases were in the peak reproductive age group of 21-30 years, which was in concordance with most other studies.[2,46]

HIV was the most common STI seen in our study (34.7%). Similar to a previous study from this institute, herpes genitalis was the most common ulcerative STI (32.8%) and continues to increase in frequency when compared to earlier studies.[4,7] Similar higher incidence of herpes genitalis has been reported by studies by Parmar et al. (27.9%) and Kumar et al. (19.7%).[2,8] A low prevalence of the herpes genitalis has been reported by Chopra et al. (9.4%) and Manas et al. (6.8%).[8,9]

Although syphilis was the second most common ulcerative STID, its incidence had decreased when compared to previous years[4,7] and latent syphilis was the most common presentation (78.6%). Manas et al. (15.6%) amd Parmar et al. (28.1%) have shown a higher incidence.[8,9] Chancroid seems to be on the decline as evident from other studies as well.[4,7,8]

Genital warts showed a high incidence (17.6%) similar to studies by Kumar et al. (25.2%), Gupta et al. (18.11%), and Aggarwal et al. (19.35%) with an increasing trend over the years.[2,3,7] Our study showed a relatively higher incidence of non-gonococal urethritis(14.1%) than gonnococal urethritis (1.8%), while most other studies have shown the contrary.[2,5,8] This general trend of decrease in bacterial STIs could be attributed to the ‘Syndromic treatment’ of STIs by peripheral health workers and private practitioners along with widespread use of broad spectrum antibiotics for other illnesses. Viral infections tend to persist or recur necessitating repeated consultations. The recurrent and unremitting symptoms of viral STIs coupled with media propaganda of HIV and AIDS prompts these patients to report to a higher centre for treatment and voluntary testing to rule out HIV disease.

The prevalence of HIV among STI clients in India has been on the rise[7,9,10] but has quite alarmingly become the most common STI in our study (34.7%). Only a very few studies from Bombay and Pune[10,11] had shown a similar high prevalence. The proportion of female clients is also increasing[7,12,13] (present study 1.6:1) with their maximum prevalence (30 patients, 52.6%) in the peak reproductive age group of 21-30 years suggesting that the infection is spreading from high-risk population to low-risk population. This might lead to increased perinatal transmission and more HIV-positive children. HIV seropositivity was more commonly seen with ulcerative STIs, especially herpes genitalis, closely followed by genital warts, features consistent with the general trends noted with most other studies.[7,12]

The increasing media propaganda and health education about the transmission of HIV disease and the need to test for the same if they develop particular symptoms have brought more asymptomatic patients for voluntary screening, but the continuing aberrant sexual behavior and low condom usage show that the prevention arm of HIV and STD control is not yet fully functional.

Footnotes

Source of Support: Nil

Conflict of Interest: Nil.

References

  • 1.Fleming DT, Wasserheit JN. From epidemiological synergy to public health policy and practice: The contribution of other sexually transmitted diseases to sexual transmission of HIV infection. Sex Transm Infect. 1999;75:3–17. doi: 10.1136/sti.75.1.3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kumar B, Handa S, Malhotra S. Changing trends in sexually transmitted diseases. Indian J Sex Transm Dis. 1995;16:24–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Murugesh SB, Sugareddy, Raghunath Pattern of sexually transmitted disease at Davengere. Indian J Sex Transm Dis. 2004;25:10–2. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Garg BR, Baruah MC, Sait MA. Pattern of sexually transmitted diseases at JIPMER, Pondicherry. Indian J Sex Transm Dis. 1985;6:41–3. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chaudary SD, Bhatia KK, Bansal RK, Jain VK. Pattern of sexually transmitted diseases in Rohtak. Indian J Sex Transm Dis. 1988;9:4–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Garg BR, Lal S. Changing pattern of sexually transmitted diseases. Indian J Sex Transm Dis. 1982;3:41–2. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Thappa DM, Singh S, Singh A. HIV infection and sexually transmitted diseases in a referral STD centre in south India. Sex Transm Infect. 1999;75:191. doi: 10.1136/sti.75.3.191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Parmar J, Raval RC, Bilimoria Clinical profile of STDs in a civil hospital, Ahmedabad. Indian J Sex Transm Dis. 1988;9:4–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Manas C, Ramadasan P. Profile of sexually transmitted diseases in and around Jabalpur. Indian J Sex Transm Dis. 2004;25:13–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Saple D, Kohli M, Hira S. HIV infection among STD attenders in Bombay. Int Conf AIDS. 1994;10:295. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rodrigues JJ, Mehendale SM, Shepherd ME, Divekar AD, Gangakhedkar RR, Quinn TC, et al. Risk factors for HIV infection in people attending clinics for sexually transmitted diseases in India. BMJ. 1995;311:283–6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7000.283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kumar B, Gupta S. Rising HIV prevalence in STD clinic attenders at Chandigarh (north India) — a relatively low prevalence area. Sex Transm Infect. 2000;76:59. doi: 10.1136/sti.76.1.59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Aggarwal A, Arora U. HIV seropositivity among patients with sexually transmitted diseases. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2003;69:23–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Dermatology are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES