Abstract
Rapid virologic response (RVR) and complete early virologic response (cEVR) are associated with sustained virologic response to hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy. We retrospectively examined baseline and on-treatment factors associated with RVR (HCV RNA undetectable at week 4) and cEVR (HCV RNA undetectable at week 12, regardless of week 4 response). The analysis comprised 1550 HCV genotype-1 patients from five clinical trials, including three enriched with difficult-to-treat populations, randomized to peginterferon alfa-2a 180 μg/week plus ribavirin 1000–1200 mg/day. Overall, 15.6% achieved RVR and 54.0% achieved cEVR. Baseline factors predictive of RVR were serum HCV RNA ≤ 400 000 IU/mL (OR: 7.34; P < 0.0001), alanine aminotransferase >3 × ULN (OR: 2.01; P < 0.0001), non-cirrhotic status (OR: 1.92; P = 0.0087), age ≤ 40 years (OR: 1.56; P = 0.0085), white non-Latino ethnicity (OR: 1.41; P = 0.0666) and individual study (P < 0.0001). These factors plus body mass index ≤ 27 kg/m2 were predictive of cEVR. After adjusting for these factors, mean on-treatment ribavirin dose >13 mg/kg/day was predictive of RVR (OR: 1.69; P = 0.005) and cEVR (OR: 1.24; P = 0.09), whereas peginterferon alfa-2a dose reduction was not. Greater decreases in haematologic parameters were observed in patients who achieved cEVR compared with patients who did not. In conclusion, several baseline and on-treatment factors were associated with RVR and cEVR to peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin in difficult-to-treat HCV genotype-1 patients, providing important prognostic information on the antiviral response in a patient cohort that is reflective of the general chronic hepatitis C population.
Keywords: chronic hepatitis C, on-treatment, pre-treatment, sustained virologic response
Introduction
The recommended treatment for chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients is combination therapy with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin. The goal of this treatment is a sustained virologic response (SVR), defined as the absence of detectable viral ribonucleic acid (RNA) at 6 months after the end of treatment. Despite improvements that have increased SVR rates, treating CHC remains a challenge in certain populations such as those patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1, with high viral load, cirrhosis or of African American race/ethnicity [1–3].
In a registration trial of peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin, patients infected with HCV genotype 1 achieved an optimal SVR rate of 52% after 48 weeks of treatment [1]. Given the significant side-effects and healthcare costs associated with interferon therapies, identifying patients who are less likely to respond is highly desirable. Studies have demonstrated that early antiviral response is predictive of a SVR [4]. Patients who failed to achieve a complete early virologic response (cEVR) (defined as undetectable HCV RNA after 12 weeks of treatment) or a partial EVR (pEVR, defined as a ≥ 2-log10 decrease from baseline in HCV RNA after 12 weeks of treatment) had a lower likelihood of achieving SVR with an additional 36 weeks of treatment [2,5–7]. Rapid virologic response (RVR), defined as undetectable HCV RNA after 4 weeks of treatment [8], was found to be the single best predictor of SVR in HCV genotype 1-infected patients treated with peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin [8].
Baseline factors that have been shown to predict SVR to peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin include HCV genotype (other than type 1), age (≤40 years) and body weight (≤75 kg) [6]. Identifying factors that predict RVR and cEVR should further refine CHC treatment regimens. In patients infected with HCV genotype 1 and treated with peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin for 24 weeks, baseline factors associated with RVR included lower viral load, absence of cirrhosis/bridging fibrosis and HCV genotype 1b [8]. Lower viral load was also associated with EVR/cEVR in patients treated with peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin [9]. Recent evidence suggests that changes in haematologic parameters may be associated with virologic response to therapy [10]. Patients with a null response to peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin demonstrated a smaller reduction in haematologic parameters than patients who achieved full virologic response, suggesting a systemic resistance to treatment [10].
Available data on the factors associated with achieving RVR and cEVR in difficult-to-treat HCV genotype 1-infected patients treated with a standard regimen, consisting of peginterferon alfa-2a 180 μg/week plus ribavirin 1000 or 1200 mg/day for 48 weeks, is limited. Identifying these factors may provide information to optimize and/or individualize the treatment of HCV genotype 1-infected patients, thus improving antiviral response. This is of particular importance because these difficult to treat populations have a high prevalence of HCV infection and comprise a large proportion of the HCV-infected population in the United States [11]. We, therefore, retrospectively analysed the data from five large clinical trials, three of which were enriched with difficult-to-treat patients, to examine the baseline and on-treatment factors associated with a RVR and cEVR to treatment with peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin.
Materials and Methods
Patients
The analysis population consisted of all patients from five clinical trials who were infected with HCV genotype 1 (mono infection) and randomized to treatment for 48 weeks with subcutaneous peginterferon alfa-2a (Pegasys®; Roche, Nutley, NJ, USA; 180 μg/week) plus oral ribavirin (Copegus®; Roche, Nutley, NJ, USA; 1000 or 1200 mg/day) [1,3,6,12,13]. Three of these trials were enriched with difficult-to-treat patients, including one trial in which all 189 patients had high viral load (>800 000 IU/mL) at baseline (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00107653) [12]; one trial in which 78 of 106 patients (74%) were of black race [3]; and one trial in which 268 of 567 patients (47%) were of white Latino ethnicity (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00087607) [13].
Study design
EVR was originally defined as cEVR (HCV RNA undetectable at week 12) or pEVR (HCV RNA detectable but >2 log decrease at week 12) regardless of week 4 RNA level. In this study, we investigated RVR (RNA undetectable at week 4) and cEVR (RNA undetectable at week 12, regardless of week 4 response). Patients with missing HCV RNA measurements at week 4 (or week 12), regardless of reason, were considered non-responders (non-RVR [or non-cEVR]) in the intent-to-treat (ITT) efficacy analyses of virologic end-points. There were small variations between studies in the detection limits for HCV RNA. Undetectable levels were defined as HCV RNA <28 IU/mL in one study (Roche High Pure System/COBAS® TaqMan® HCV Monitor Test) [14], <60 IU/mL in another study (Roche Amplicor polymerase chain reaction [PCR] assay) [12] and <50 IU/mL in the remaining three studies (Roche Amplicor PCR assay) [1,3,6].
Statistical analysis
Baseline and demographic factors used in stepwise multiple logistic regression analyses included age (≤40 vs >40 years), sex, race/ethnicity (white non-Latino vs other), body mass index (BMI; ≤27 vs >27 kg/m2), baseline alanine aminotransferase (ALT) quotient (≤3 vs >3 × upper limit of normal [ULN]), serum HCV RNA concentration (≤400 000 vs >400 000 IU/mL), cirrhosis classification (cirrhotic vs non-cirrhotic) and individual study. The final model was based on the stepwise multiple variable logistic regression. Factors that had a P < 0.1 from the univariate analysis were allowed to enter the multiple regression model and factors with an adjusted P < 0.2 were kept in the model. Wald chi-square confidence intervals (CI) and P-values were used for testing the effects; P ≤ 0.2 indicated significant factors that remained in the final model. To account for differences between the studies, each individual study was forced into the model as a stratification factor regardless of its significance level. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% CI were calculated for the independent predictive factors.
Additional multiple variable logistic regression analyses included adjusting for all individually identified significant baseline prognostic factors and investigating the association of two on-treatment characteristics with RVR and cEVR: average daily exposure to ribavirin (≤13 vs >13 mg/kg) and peginterferon alfa-2a dose reductions (yes vs no).
Neutrophil counts, platelet counts and hemoglobin concentrations were assessed to determine if there were any associations between virologic and haematologic responses in these patients. Changes from baseline in these haematologic parameters were compared at weeks 4 and 12 in the RVR vs the non-RVR group, and in the cEVR vs the non-cEVR group. Haematologic changes result from the systemic effects of peginterferon and ribavirin and, therefore, can serve as indirect (surrogate) measures of host responses to interferons and may also reflect drug exposure and adherence.
Results
Baseline characteristics
Patient demographics and characteristics at baseline are shown in Table 1. Of the 1550 patients treated with peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin, 242 (15.6%) patients achieved RVR and 837 (54.0%) patients achieved cEVR (Table 1). The proportion of patients in the individual trials with a RVR ranged from 7.4% to 22.6%, while the proportion of patients with a cEVR ranged from 34.0% to 64.3% (Fig. 1). Patient baseline characteristics as a function of RVR and cEVR status and the P-values from the univariate analyses are presented in Table 2. In general, the patient characteristics that were more likely to be associated with achievement of RVR and cEVR were similar.
Table 1.
Patient demographics, baseline characteristics and average daily ribavirin dose for the total population, rapid virologic response group (RVR) and complete early virologic response group (cEVR)
| Characteristic | Total | RVR | cEVR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of patients, n (%)* | 1550 (100.0) | 242 (15.6) | 837 (54.0) |
| Sex, n (%)† | |||
| Male | 1031 (66.5) | 162 (66.9) | 549 (65.6) |
| Age, years, mean ± SD | 45.3 ± 9.24 | 42.2 ± 9.99 | 43.7 ± 9.31 |
| Age ≤40 years, n (%)† | 438 (28.3) | 100 (41.3) | 298 (35.6) |
| Weight, kg, mean ± sd | 82.4 ± 18.1 | 78.2 ± 16.1 | 81.1 ± 17.8 |
| Weight ≤75 kg, n (%)† | 567 (36.6) | 104 (43.0) | 331 (39.5) |
| BMI, kg/m2, mean ± SD | 28.0 ± 5.35 | 26.6 ± 4.46 | 27.5 ± 5.23 |
| BMI ≤27 kg/m2, n (%)† | 734 (47.4) | 140 (57.9) | 435 (52.0) |
| Race, n (%)† | |||
| White non-Latino | 1049 (67.7) | 179 (74.0) | 611 (73.0) |
| White Latino | 296 (19.1) | 39 (16.1) | 141 (16.8) |
| Black | 154 (9.9) | 8 (3.3) | 47 (5.6) |
| Other | 51 (3.3) | 16 (6.6) | 38 (4.5) |
| ALT, n (%)† | |||
| ALT quotient >3 × ULN | 362 (23.4) | 79 (32.6) | 225 (26.9) |
| HCV RNA, log10, mean ± sd | 6.2 ± 0.71 | 5.5 ± 0.92 | 6.1 ± 0.79 |
| Serum HCV RNA | |||
| ≤400 000 IU/mL, n (%)† | 296 (19.1) | 125 (51.7) | 222 (26.5) |
| ≤800 000 IU/mL, n (%) | 476 (30.7) | 154 (32.4) | 310 (65.1) |
| Cirrhotic classification, n (%)† | |||
| Cirrhotic | 240 (15.5) | 25 (10.3) | 103 (12.3) |
| On-treatment average daily ribavirin dose, n (%)† | |||
| ≤13 mg/kg | 487 (31.4) | 50 (20.7) | 251 (30.0) |
| >13 mg/kg | 1063 (68.6) | 192 (79.3) | 586 (70.0) |
ALT, alanine aminotransferase; BMI, body mass index; SD, standard deviation; ULN, upper limit normal.
% Calculated relative to the total population.
% Calculated relative to RVR or cEVR groups.
Fig. 1.
Percentage of patients with rapid virologic response (RVR) or complete early virologic response (cEVR) in individual studies of peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin—intent-to-treat.
Table 2.
Baseline characteristics and average daily ribavirin dose as a function of rapid virologic response (RVR) and complete early virologic response (cEVR)
| RVR |
cEVR |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristic | n (%) | P-value† | n (%) | P-value† |
| Number of patients* | 242 (15.6) | 837 (54.0) | ||
| Sex | ||||
| Male | 162 (15.7) | 0.8659 | 549 (53.2) | 0.4235 |
| Female | 80 (15.4) | 288 (55.5) | ||
| Age | ||||
| Age ≤40 years | 100 (22.8) | <0.0001 | 298 (68.0) | <0.0001 |
| Age >40 years | 142 (12.8) | 539 (48.5) | ||
| Weight | ||||
| Weight ≤75 kg | 104 (18.3) | 0.0268 | 331 (58.4) | 0.0095 |
| Weight >75 kg | 138 (14.0) | 506 (51.5) | ||
| BMI | ||||
| BMI ≤27 kg/m2 | 140 (19.1) | 0.0009 | 435 (59.3) | 0.0001 |
| BMI >27 kg/m2 | 102 (12.8) | 393 (49.3) | ||
| Race | ||||
| White non-Latino | 179 (17.1) | 0.0268 | 611 (58.2) | <0.0001 |
| White Latino | 39 (13.2) | 141 (47.6) | ||
| Black | 8 (5.2) | 47 (30.5) | ||
| Other | 16 (31.4) | 38 (74.5) | ||
| ALT | ||||
| ALT quotient ≤3 × ULN | 163 (13.7) | 0.0002 | 612 (51.5) | 0.0004 |
| ALT quotient >3 × ULN | 79 (21.8) | 225 (62.2) | ||
| HCV RNA | ||||
| Serum HCV RNA ≤400 000 IU/mL | 125 (42.2) | <0.0001 | 222 (75.0) | <0.0001 |
| Serum HCV RNA >400 000 IU/mL | 117 (9.3) | 615 (49.1) | ||
| Cirrhotic classification | ||||
| Non-cirrhotic | 217 (16.6) | 0.0167 | 734 (56.0) | 0.0002 |
| Cirrhotic | 25 (10.4) | 103 (42.9) | ||
| On-treatment average daily ribavirin dose | ||||
| ≤13 mg/kg/day | 50 (10.7) | 0.0001 | 251 (47.7) | <0.0001 |
| >13 mg/kg/day | 192 (17.7) | 586 (57.2) | ||
ALT, alanine aminotransferase; BMI, body mass index; ULN, upper limit normal.
% Calculated relative to the total population (n = 1550).
P-value from univariate analysis.
Patient disposition
Overall, a total of 16 patients (1%) and 40 patients (2.6%) withdrew from the study due to safety reasons by weeks 4 and 12, respectively. Seventeen patients (1.1%) and 44 patients (2.8%) withdrew due to non-safety reasons by weeks 4 and 12, respectively. Adverse events leading to withdrawal by week 4 included anaemia, chest pain, fatigue, rash, tongue oedema, headache, gastrointestinal events such as nausea and abdominal pain, and psychiatric effects such as aggression, suicide ideation and emotional instability.
Multiple logistic regression analysis
The results of the multiple logistic regression analyses demonstrated that baseline factors independently associated with a RVR included serum HCV RNA ≤400 000 IU/mL (OR: 7.34; 95% CI 5.29–10.19; P < 0.0001), ALT quotient >3 × ULN (OR: 2.01; 95% CI 1.43–2.81; P < 0.0001), non-cirrhotic status (OR: 1.92; 95% CI 1.18–3.13; P = 0.0087), age ≤40 years (OR: 1.56; 95% CI 1.12–2.16; P = 0.0085), white non-Latino race (OR: 1.41; 95% CI 0.98–2.03; P = 0.0666) and individual study (P < 0.0001). The same independent factors were associated with a cEVR in this analysis: baseline serum HCV RNA ≤400 000 IU/mL (OR: 2.81; 95% CI 2.07–3.81; P < 0.0001), non-cirrhotic status at baseline (OR: 1.95; 95% CI 1.43–2.65; P < 0.0001), age ≤40 years (OR: 1.81; 95% CI 1.41–2.34; P < 0.0001), baseline ALT quotient >3 × ULN (OR: 1.61; 95% CI 1.24–2.09; P = 0.0003), white non-Latino race (OR: 1.59; 95% CI 1.24–2.04; P = 0.0002) and individual study (P < 0.0001). In addition, BMI (≤27 vs >27 kg/m2) was associated with a cEVR in this analysis (OR: 1.21; 95% CI 0.97–1.50; P = 0.0925). In this report we defined HCV RNA <400 000 IU/mL as low viral load. However, similar results were obtained when the analysis was repeated with higher HCV RNA cut-off levels (≤600 000 vs >60 000 IU/mL and ≤800 000 vs >800 000 IU/mL). Also, similar results were also obtained when the analysis was repeated using different BMI cut-off levels (>25 vs≤25 kg/m2 and >30 vs≤30 kg/m2) [M. Rodriguez-Torres, L.J. Jeffers, M.Y. Sheikh, L. Rossaro, V.A. Sey, F.M. Hamzeh and P. Martin, unpublished data].
After adjusting for significant risk factors in the baseline characteristics model (Table 3), multiple logistic regression analysis showed that compared with an average on-treatment daily ribavirin dose of ≤13 mg/kg, an average on-treatment daily ribavirin dose of >13 mg/kg was a predictor of RVR (OR: 1.69; 95% CI 1.17–2.43; P = 0.0049) and cEVR (OR: 1.24; 95% CI 0.97–1.59; P = 0.0907). BMI was associated with cEVR before, but was not after, adjusting for ribavirin exposure. BMI was not associated with RVR (Table 3). In contrast, peginterferon alfa-2a dose reduction (yes vs no) was not a predictor of RVR or cEVR.
Table 3.
Summary of multiple logistic regression analysis for baseline factors and average daily ribavirin dose predictive of rapid virologic response (RVR) and complete early virologic response (cEVR)adjusting for significant baseline prognostic factors
| RVR |
cEVR |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factor | OR (95% CI) | P-value* | OR (95% CI) | P-value* |
| Race | ||||
| White non-Latino vs other | 1.45 (1.00–2.08) | 0.0474 | 1.61 (1.25–2.06) | 0.0002 |
| Age | ||||
| ≤40 vs >40 years | 1.51 (1.08–2.09) | 0.0145 | 1.81 (1.40–2.32) | <0.0001 |
| Baseline ALT quotient | ||||
| >3 vs≤3 × ULN | 2.06 (1.47–2.89) | <0.0001 | 1.61 (1.24–2.10) | 0.0003 |
| Baseline serum HCV RNA | ||||
| ≤400 000 vs >400 000 IU/mL | 7.25 (5.23–10.07) | <0.0001 | 2.81 (2.07–3.82) | <0.0001 |
| Cirrhosis | ||||
| Non-cirrhotic vs cirrhotic | 1.94 (1.19–3.17) | 0.0077 | 1.96 (1.44–2.68) | <0.0001 |
| Individual study | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | ||
| Average daily ribavirin dose† | ||||
| >13 mg/kg vs≤13 mg/kg) | 1.69 (1.17–2.43) | 0.0049 | 1.24 (0.97–1.59) | 0.0907 |
ALT, alanine aminotransferase; CI, confidence intervals; OR, odds ratios; ULN, upper limit normal.
A significance level of P < 0.1 was used to qualify entrance into the multiple logistic regression model, and factors with P ≤ 0.2 were allowed to stay in the final model. Study was forced into the model, regardless of its significance.
On-treatment average daily ribavirin dose.
Haematologic effects of peginterferon plus ribavirin
The association of other host pharmacodynamic effects of peginterferon and ribavirin with antiviral activity was investigated (Table 4). In the RVR and non-RVR groups, mean changes in neutrophil counts at weeks 4 and 12 decreased from baseline to a similar extent with no difference observed between the groups. In the cEVR and non-cEVR groups, mean changes in neutrophil counts at weeks 4 and 12 also decreased from baseline; however, the cEVR group had a greater decrease in neutrophil counts at week 12 than the non-cEVR group (P = 0.0003). Platelet counts decreased from baseline at weeks 4 and 12 in all groups although the changes were not significant. Mean haemoglobin concentrations also decreased between weeks 4 and 12 in all groups. The decrease from baseline to week 12 in the cEVR group was greater than that in the non-cEVR group (P = 0.0160). In the univariate analysis, body weight and on-treatment drug exposure were both associated with RVR and cEVR. The influence of these factors on the observed decreases in haematologic parameters between the response and non-response groups was analysed. After adjusting for body weight and on-treatment drug exposure, the decrease from baseline to week 12 in neutrophil counts and haemoglobin concentrations in the cEVR group compared with the non-cEVR group remained significant (P = 0.0008 and P = 0.0179, respectively); the decrease in platelet counts remained non-significant (P = 0.2093) [M. Rodriguez-Torres, L.J. Jeffers, M.Y. Sheikh, L. Rossaro, V.A. Sey, F.M. Hamzeh and P. Martin, unpublished data]. The results in the RVR and non-RVR groups also remained unchanged. This suggests that body weight and on-treatment drug exposure were not confounding factors in the observed haematologic changes between the response and non-response groups.
Table 4.
Changes in neutrophil counts, platelet counts and haemoglobin concentration at weeks 4 and 12 in patients treated with peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin
| RVR |
Non-RVR |
cEVR |
Non-cEVR |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | Change from baseline | n | Change from baseline | P-value* | n | Change from baseline | n | Change from baseline | P-value† | |
| Neutrophil count‡ | ||||||||||
| Week 4 | 228 | −1.8 ± 1.35 | 1246 | −2.0 ± 1.39 | – | 801 | −2.1 ± 1.38 | 673 | −1.8 ± 1.38 | – |
| Week 12 | 230 | −1.9 ± 1.77 | 1236 | −2.0 ± 1.65 | 0.7969 | 826 | −2.2 ± 1.52 | 640 | −1.8 ± 1.82 | 0.0003 |
| Platelet count‡ | ||||||||||
| Week 4 | 233 | −56.7 ± 43.80 | 1243 | −47.2 ± 46.90 | – | 805 | −53.5 ± 46.75 | 671 | −43.0 ± 45.68 | – |
| Week 12 | 231 | −66.4 ± 46.80 | 1234 | −66.1 ± 49.73 | 0.4846 | 824 | −70.7 ± 50.74 | 641 | −60.2 ± 46.68 | 0.0859 |
| Haemoglobin concentration§ | ||||||||||
| Week 4 | 241 | −2.6 ± 1.80 | 1300 | −2.7 ± 1.94 | – | 836 | −2.6 ± 1.86 | 705 | −2.8 ± 1.99 | – |
| Week 12 | 239 | −3.2 ± 1.74 | 1279 | −3.2 ± 1.84 | 0.3827 | 835 | −3.2 ± 1.71 | 683 | −3.2 ± 1.96 | 0.0160 |
ANCOVA, analysis of covariance; cEVR, complete early virologic response; RVR, rapid virologic response; SD, standard deviation. Level of statistical significance for haematologic analysis set at 0.05.
P-value for between RVR and non-RVR group change from baseline at week 12 based on ANCOVA with baseline values and responder group as covariates.
P-value for between cEVR and non-cEVR group change from baseline at week 12 based on ANCOVA with baseline values and responder group as covariates.
×103/μL, mean ± SD.
g/dL, mean ± sd.
Discussion
The response to antiviral therapy in HCV-infected patients is heterogeneous and, despite increases in SVR rates, treatment outcomes with peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin are not optimal in certain patient populations and might still be improved [1,2]. Monitoring the early antiviral response to therapy can help identify those patients who are less likely to achieve SVR and therefore provide critical information for the overall management of patients with CHC.
Both RVR and cEVR are associated with the achievement of SVR in patients with CHC [15]. Identifying the baseline and on-treatment factors, both virus and patient related, that are associated with RVR and cEVR to therapy with peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin may help predict a patient’s response to treatment, as well as provide important information that can be used to improve viral outcomes [15–17]. For example, the modification of baseline and/or on-treatment factors, such as drug dose, may help increase the likelihood of successful response to therapy. Furthermore, early identification of those patients who are unlikely to achieve RVR or cEVR may help to reduce unnecessary healthcare expenses and limit the side-effects associated with drug exposure.
The analysis presented here demonstrated that several patient characteristics, including lower serum HCV RNA, higher ALT quotient, absence of cirrhosis, younger age and white non-Latino race/ethnicity were associated with successful achievement of RVR and cEVR in patients infected with HCV genotype 1. In addition, lower BMI was associated with achieving cEVR. The effects of peginterferon-alfa 2a dose and ribavirin dose on RVR and cEVR were also analysed. Ribavirin dose was a predictor of RVR and cEVR, whereas peginterferon-alfa 2a dose or dose reduction was not. This finding is in agreement with previous studies that evaluated the effect of ribavirin dose reductions on virologic response rates in HCV genotype 1-infected patients [18]. Our analysis showed that, when combined with peginterferon alfa-2a 180 μg/week, higher daily on-treatment ribavirin exposure increased the likelihood of achieving RVR and cEVR, even in difficult-to-treat patients infected with HCV genotype 1. Specifically, ribavirin exposure >13 vs≤13 mg/kg/day was associated with a greater proportion of patients achieving RVR and cEVR (17.7%vs 10.7% and 57.2%vs 47.7%, respectively). Further analysis to determine the effect of average on-treatment daily ribavirin dose on the likelihood of RVR and cEVR suggested that a linear relationship existed up to ∼12 and 10 mg/kg/day, respectively, after which the effect remained relatively constant (data not shown). However, cut-off points could not be identified since no clear inflection points were obtained. Individual study was also found to be predictive of RVR and cEVR even after adjusting for the effects of known factors such as Latino ethnicity which accounted for ∼50% of the LATINO study population [13]. Beyond the known factors (such as black or Latino ethnicity or having a large proportion of patients with a high baseline viral load), other unknown factors (such as differences between studies in time effects or improvements in HCV treatment practices over time) and variables such as different peginterferon and ribavirin dose adjustment protocols may have contributed to individual study being a predictive factor.
Limited data have been published regarding the factors associated with RVR and cEVR. A few studies have shown that in patients receiving peginterferon alfa plus ribavirin, lower viral load, younger age, lower body weight and absence of advanced fibrosis may be associated with a RVR [8,19–21]. Jensen et al. [8] conducted a post hoc analysis of 216 HCV genotype 1-infected patients randomized to 24 weeks of treatment with peginterferon alfa-2a 180 μg/week plus ribavirin either 800 mg/day (low dose) or 1000/1200 mg/day (standard dose), and showed that baseline viral load was a significant predictor of RVR. Although the overall RVR rate was 23.6%, patients with baseline HCV RNA <200 000 IU/mL, 200 000–600 000 IU/mL and >600 000 IU/mL had RVR rates of 49.1%, 26.0% and 9.2%, respectively. Statistical analysis showed that, relative to patients with baseline HCV RNA >600 000 IU/mL, those patients with HCV RNA <200 000 IU/mL (OR: 9.7; 95% CI 4.2–22.5; P < 0.0001) or 200 000–600 000 IU/mL (OR: 3.6; 95% CI 1.5–9.1; P = 0.0057) were significantly more likely to achieve RVR. Overall, SVR rates were considerably higher in patients who achieved RVR than in those patients who did not (89%vs 19%), and RVR was a significant predictor of SVR (OR: 23.7; 95% CI 9.1–61.7; P < 0.0001). In addition, patients infected with HCV subtype 1b were more likely to achieve RVR than those patients infected with HCV subtype 1a (OR: 1.8; 95% CI 0.9–3.7; P = 0.095). A lack of RVR was also associated with liver fibrosis or cirrhosis. More recently, in a multicenter study conducted in the south of Italy, 696 HCV genotype 1-infected patients were randomized to treatment with peginterferon alfa-2a or alfa-2b, each plus ribavirin, for either 48 weeks or for an individualized duration based on the time at which HCV RNA undetectability was first achieved [20]. In univariate analysis, young age (P = 0.004), low baseline viral load (P = 0.0001) and fibrosis stage ≤2 (P = 0.0001) were associated with RVR. In multivariate analysis, HCV RNA levels <400 000 IU/mL (OR: 2.27; 95% CI 1.49–3.41) and absence of advanced fibrosis (OR: 1.40; 95% CI 1.15–1.64) were independently associated with achieving a RVR. Lower baseline viral load (<400 000 IU/mL) was also the only significant factor associated with a RVR (OR: 3.052; 95% CI 1.706–5.458) in 200 previously untreated Taiwanese patients infected with HCV genotype 1 who were randomized to treatment with peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin for either 24 or 48 weeks [21]. While our results are in agreement with these studies, we believe the analysis reported here is the first to include an ethnically diverse cohort that is representative of the general CHC population.
Haematologic adverse effects are relatively common when interferons are combined with ribavirin [22] and can also reflect a patient’s response to therapy. In patients receiving peginterferon/ribavirin, haematologic changes can be considered a marker of pharmacodynamic effects, and may correlate with anti-HCV activities. Similarly, a lack of a haematologic effect may indicate a poor response to therapy. Indeed, it has recently been reported that null virologic response to combination therapy is associated with a blunted haematologic response, suggesting null responders are resistant to interferon therapy [10]. In our analysis, neutrophil counts, platelet counts and haemoglobin concentrations decreased from baseline to weeks 4 and 12 in all groups. While there was no difference in haematologic response between the RVR and non-RVR groups, significantly greater decreases in haematologic parameters at week 12 were shown in patients who achieved cEVR when compared with those patients who did not achieve cEVR. The absence of any observable difference in haematologic side-effects between the RVR and non-RVR groups may be due to the smaller proportion of patients achieving RVR. Alternatively, it could be due to the nadir of haematologic adverse events occurring later than 4 weeks (6–8 weeks) [12]. In addition, the body’s ability to mount a haematologic proliferation response may have been able to compensate during the early phase of therapy, thus masking the pharmacodynamic effects of the treatment. The observed blunted response to combination therapy in the non-cEVR group suggests that patient factors may be partly responsible for the individual variability in the systemic response to peginterferon and/or ribavirin. Analysis of these patient factors may prove useful in improving treatment outcomes, as well as further our understanding of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship between drug dose and antiviral response. For example, patients who required dose reductions may be more likely to be responders than non-responders, thus suggesting that antiviral response and haematologic effects are, in essence, the pharmacodynamic effects of interferons and ribavirin. Furthermore, it may also reflect a different pharmacokinetic profile in these patients, as well as indirectly correlate with adherence and total exposure [23,24].
In the current analysis, 16% of patients achieved RVR. This rate is lower than the rates reported in other studies [8,20,21] and is likely due to the number of studies in this analysis that were enriched with patient populations that are considered more difficult to treat. For example, patients with viral loads >400 000 and >800 000 IU/mL comprised ∼81% and 70% of the total study population, respectively; black patients and white Latino patients comprised ∼30%, which is reflective of the general CHC population. Furthermore, the heterogeneous characteristics of the patients among the five studies included in this analysis are also likely to contribute to the range of RVR rates observed (7–23%). In fact, in the two trials with the lowest RVR rates, the majority of patients were black [3] or had a high baseline viral load (>800 000 IU/mL) [12]. In contrast, the study with the highest RVR rate had a relatively small proportion of patients with poor prognostic markers [1]. Thus, by including a diverse range of populations that more closely represents the prevalence distribution of HCV infection in the United States, our analysis provides a meaningful assessment of the virologic response rates to treatment with peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin, and underscores the need to develop more effective treatment strategies for these patients.
In this retrospective analysis, we demonstrated that baseline and on-treatment factors, including lower serum HCV RNA concentration, higher ALT quotient, absence of cirrhosis, younger age, white non-Latino ethnicity and daily on-treatment ribavirin dose >13 mg/kg, were independently associated with achieving RVR and cEVR in patients infected with HCV genotype 1 and treated with peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin for 48 weeks. There is a need to improve further the efficacy of combination therapy, as well as limit the associated side-effects and healthcare costs, especially in those patient populations considered difficult to treat. Optimizing the antiviral response is crucial for accomplishing these goals. Since ribavirin dose is one of the only modifiable factors identified in this analysis that is associated with an increase in RVR and cEVR, physicians may be advised to maintain a higher ribavirin dose to increase the likelihood of achieving SVR. Thus, identifying the predictors of response to peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin therapy and tailoring treatment regimens for individual patients based on their risk profile may be one approach for achieving maximum antiviral response. These findings will need to be supported by large, prospective clinical studies that are designed to evaluate whether SVR rates can be increased by modifying baseline or on-treatment factors.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Ellen Lenz, PhD, of Roche for statistical support and Paul MacCallum, PhD, of Envision Scientific Solutions for editorial assistance.
Authors’ declaration of personal interests: (i) D. Jensen has served as a consultant and an advisory board member for Roche, Vertex, Abbott and Boehringer-Ingelheim, and has received research funding from Roche, Vertex, Boehringer-Ingelheim and Schering-Plough. R. Chung has served as a consultant for Roche and has received research funding from Roche. M. Sulkowski has served as a speaker and a consultant for Roche and Schering, and has received research funding from John Hopkins University. M. Rodriguez-Torres has served as a speaker for Roche and an advisory board member for Roche, Pharmasset, Anadys, Vertex, Abbott and Merck, and has received research funding from Roche, Vertex, Bristol, HGS, Glaxo, Idera, Intarcia, Virochem Pharma, Novartis, Wyeth and Abbott, (ii) F.M. Hamzeh is an employee of Roche.
Declaration of funding interests: (i) This study was funded in full by Roche, (ii) The writing of this paper was funded in part by Roche, (iii) Initial data analyses were undertaken by Ellen Lenz, PhD who is an employee of Roche and received funding from Roche, (iv) Writing support was provided by Paul MacCallum, PhD of Envision Scientific Solutions and funded by Roche.
Glossary
Abbreviations:
- ALT
alanine aminotransferase
- BMI
body mass index
- cEVR
complete early virologic response
- CHC
chronic hepatitis C
- CI
confidence interval
- EVR
early virologic response
- HCV
hepatitis C virus
- ITT
intent-to-treat
- OR
odds ratio
- RNA
ribonucleic acid
- RVR
rapid virologic response
- SVR
sustained virologic response
- ULN
upper limit of normal
References
- 1.Hadziyannis SJ, Sette H, Jr, Morgan TR, et al. Peginterferon-α2a and ribavirin combination therapy in chronic hepatitis C: a randomized study of treatment duration and ribavirin dose. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140(5):346–355. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-140-5-200403020-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lee SS, Heathcote EJ, Reddy KR, et al. Prognostic factors and early predictability of sustained viral response with peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD) J Hepatol. 2002;37(4):500–506. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(02)00211-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jeffers LJ, Cassidy W, Howell CD, Hu S, Reddy KR. Peginterferon alfa-2a (40 kd) and ribavirin for black American patients with chronic HCV genotype 1. Hepatology. 2004;39(6):1702–1708. doi: 10.1002/hep.20212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Civeira MP, Prieto J. Early predictors of response to treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis C. J Hepatol. 1999;31(Suppl. 1):237–243. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(99)80409-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Davis GL, Wong JB, McHutchison JG, Manns MP, Harvey J, Albrecht J. Early virologic response to treatment with peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2003;38(3):645–652. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2003.50364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fried MW, Shiffman ML, Reddy KR, et al. Peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C virus infection. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(13):975–982. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Manns MP, McHutchison JG, Gordon SC, et al. Peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin compared with interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin for initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2001;358(9286):958–965. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(01)06102-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Jensen DM, Morgan TR, Marcellin P, et al. Early identification of HCV genotype 1 patients responding to 24 weeks peginterferon α-2a (40 kd)/ribavirin therapy. Hepatology. 2006;43(5):954–960. doi: 10.1002/hep.21159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gheorghe L, Iacob S, Sporea I, et al. Efficacy, tolerability and predictive factors for early and sustained virologic response in patients treated with weight-based dosing regimen of PegIFN alpha-2b ribavirin in real-life healthcare setting. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2007;16(1):23–29. doi: 10.1007/s11749-007-0047-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lindsay KL, Morishima C, Wright EC, et al. Blunted cytopenias and weight loss: new correlates of virologic null response to re-treatment of chronic hepatitis C. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6(2):234–241. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.11.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Nainan OV, Alter MJ, Kruszon-Moran D, et al. Hepatitis C virus genotypes and viral concentrations in participants of a general population survey in the United States. Gastroenterology. 2006;131(2):478–484. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Di Bisceglie AM, Ghalib RH, Hamzeh FM, Rustgi VK. Early virologic response after peginterferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin or peginterferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis C. J Viral Hepat. 2007;14(10):721–729. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2007.00862.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rodriguez-Torres M, Jeffers LJ, Sheikh MY, et al. Peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin in Latino and non-Latino whites with hepatitis C. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(3):257–267. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0805062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Rodriguez-Torres M, Jeffers LJ, Sheikh MY, et al. Virologic responses to peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin in treatment-naïve Latino vs non-Latino Caucasians infected with HCV genotype 1: The LATINO Study. J Hepatol. 2008;48(s2):S311. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ferenci P, Fried MW, Shiffman ML, et al. Predicting sustained virological responses in chronic hepatitis C patients treated with peginterferon alfa-2a (40 KD)/ribavirin. J Hepatol. 2005;43(3):425–433. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ferenci P. Predicting the therapeutic response in patients with chronic hepatitis C: the role of viral kinetic studies. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004;53(1):15–18. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Layden TJ, Layden JE, Reddy KR, Levy-Drummer RS, Poulakos J, Neumann AU. Induction therapy with consensus interferon (CIFN) does not improve sustained virologic response in chronic hepatitis C. J Viral Hepat. 2002;9(5):334–339. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2893.2002.00376.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Reddy KR, Shiffman ML, Morgan TR, et al. Impact of ribavirin dose reductions in hepatitis C virus genotype 1 patients completing peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin treatment. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5(1):124–129. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ferenci P, Laferl H, Scherzer TM, et al. Peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin for 24 weeks in hepatitis C type 1 and 4 patients with rapid virological response. Gastroenterology. 2008;135(2):451–458. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mangia A, Minerva N, Bacca D, et al. Individualized treatment duration for hepatitis C genotype 1 patients: a randomized controlled trial. Hepatology. 2008;47(1):43–50. doi: 10.1002/hep.22061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Yu ML, Dai CY, Huang JF, et al. Rapid virological response and treatment duration for chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 patients: a randomized trial. Hepatology. 2008;47(6):1884–1893. doi: 10.1002/hep.22319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kowdley KV. Hematologic side effects of interferon and ribavirin therapy. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2005;39(Suppl. 1):S3–S8. doi: 10.1097/01.mcg.0000145494.76305.11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Snoeck E, Hadziyannis SJ, Puoti C, et al. Predicting efficacy and safety outcomes in patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 and persistently ‘normal’ alanine aminotransferase levels treated with peginterferon α-2a (40KD) plus ribavirin. Liver Int. 2008;28(1):61–71. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2007.01603.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Fried MW, Jensen DM, Rodriguez-Torres M, et al. Improved outcomes in patients with hepatitis C with difficult-to-treat characteristics: randomized study of higher doses of peginterferon α-2a and ribavirin. Hepatology. 2008;48(4):1033–1043. doi: 10.1002/hep.22448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]