Table 3.
Probability of failure within the first 12 months of use by socioeconomic characteristics of users in the United States: weighted data corrected for underreporting of abortion in the 1995 and 2002 NSFG
1995 |
2002 |
Difference | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
95% | 95% | 1995/2002: | |||
Proba- bility |
Confidence interval |
Proba- bility |
Confidence interval |
p-value | |
Age | |||||
<20 | 15.6 | (12.9 – 18.7) | 13.1 | (10.6 – 16.0) | 0.278 |
20–24 | 17.1 | (14.5 – 20.1) | 14.3 | (12.0 – 17.1) * | 0.248 |
25–29 | 14.6 | (12.0 – 17.7) | 14.9 | (12.2 – 18.1) * | 0.473 |
30+ | 11.9 | (9.7 – 14.6) | 8.2 | (6.4 – 10.4) | 0.144 |
Race/Ethnicity | |||||
Black | 23.9 | (20.7 – 27.5) * | 21.3 | (17.8 – 25.2) * | 0.310 |
Hispanic | 18.4 | (14.8 – 22.6) | 15.0 | (12.3 – 18.2) | 0.261 |
White/Others | 12.6 | (11.1 – 14.4) | 10.1 | (8.7 – 11.7) | 0.149 |
Intention status | |||||
Did not intend more | 14.3 | (12.0 – 17.0) | 9.2 | (7.5 – 11.3) * | 0.068 |
Intended more/Don't know | 15.1 | (13.5 – 16.8) | 13.9 | (12.4 – 15.6) | 0.309 |
Parity (previous births) | |||||
0 | 14.3 | (12.4 – 16.6) | 6.2 | (4.8 – 7.8) | 0.002 |
1 | 15.9 | (13.3 – 18.7) | 18.0 | (15.2 – 21.0) * | 0.310 |
2 or more | 14.8 | (12.5 – 17.4) | 16.3 | (14.1 – 18.7) * | 0.338 |
Poverty status | |||||
<100% | 25.5 | (21.7 – 29.7) * | 19.9 | (19.3 – 20.6) * | 0.094 |
100 – 199% | 17.3 | (14.4 – 20.7) | 17.8 | (17.3 – 18.4) * | 0.442 |
200% or more | 11.6 | (10.1 – 13.3) | 8.4 | (7.1 – 9.9) | 0.079 |
Union status | |||||
Cohabiting | 28.7 | (23.3 – 34.8) * | 21.7 | (18.3 – 25.5) * | 0.165 |
Formerly married | 23.1 | (17.6 – 29.8) * | 12.2 | (8.2 – 17.9) | 0.108 |
Never married | 15.4 | (13.3 – 17.7) * | 11.5 | (9.6 – 13.7) | 0.110 |
Married | 10.4 | (8.7 – 12.3) | 9.5 | (7.9 – 11.5) | 0.376 |
subgroup estimate is significantly different from reference group at p < .0.5
Note: For comparisons of statistically significant differences between subgroups within year, the siginficance for each group is measured relative to the reference group, indicated by italics (e.g., significance for younger age groups are relative to those ages 30+).