Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Pharm. 2010 Feb 1;7(1):138. doi: 10.1021/mp900177r

Organic cation uptake is enhanced in bcrp1-transfected MDCKII cells

Guoyu Pan 1,#, Tate N Winter 1,#, John C Roberts 1, Carolyn A Fairbanks 1, William F Elmquist 1,*
PMCID: PMC2814896  NIHMSID: NIHMS160012  PMID: 19886673

Abstract

Stably transfected cell models are routinely used to examine drug-transporter interactions. In one such model of bcrp1-transfected MDCKII cells, we observed a significant enhancement of organic cation intracellular accumulation. Therefore, our goal was to further explore the expression and functional consequences of this cation transport system. Transport assays were carried out in wild-type and bcrp1-transfected MDCKII cells to examine uptake of [3H]-prazosin (bcrp1 positive control), [3H]-agmatine, [3H]-TEA, and [14C]-choline. RT-PCR was employed to determine the mRNA levels of bcrp1 and OCT2/OCT3. Western-blots were used to evaluate corresponding protein levels. Accumulation studies determined a significant increase in the uptake of the organic cations agmatine, TEA, and choline in bcrp1-transfected cells when compared to wild-type cells. Directional transport of [3H]-agmatine showed a significantly greater apical (A) to basolateral (B) than B-to-A flux in both cell types. In spite of this, the A-to-B flux was significantly lower in bcrp1-transfected cells. RT-PCR revealed 10-fold higher OCT2 mRNA levels in bcrp1-transfected cells, with no changes in OCT3. OCT2 protein expression was approximately 3.5-fold higher in bcrp1-transfected cells. The up-regulation of OCT2 in bcrp1-transfected MDCKII cells contributed to a significant enhancement in the uptake of several organic cations. These results are consistent with the endogenous expression of OCT2 in the kidney tubule, and may be related to the expression and function of bcrp1. Our findings illustrate the importance of understanding how endogenous transporters, which may compete for common substrates, may be influenced by the over-expression and enhanced function of recombinant transport systems.

Keywords: OCT2, OCT3, agmatine, polyamine transporter, BCRP, transporter regulation

Introduction

In recent years, several novel drug transporters have been identified, cloned, and stably transfected in a variety of cell lines (e.g., polarized epithelial cells) with the intent of examining their individual transport characteristics. While these cell models have greatly facilitated in the discovery of transporter substrates and aided in the prediction of drug disposition and drug-drug interactions, little consideration has been given to the varying contributions of constitutively expressed transport systems, specifically those of influx nature, in the overall net transport of possible substrates.

It is well recognized that both endogenous and exogenous factors influence the expression and consequent function of various drug transporters. For example, the addition of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) to Caco-2 cells stimulates the translation of taurine transporter (TAUT) mRNA, leading to increases in TAUT protein expression and taurine uptake.1 Similarly, treatment of rats with the steroid hormone testosterone causes markedly increased renal tubule rOCT2 mRNA and protein levels.2 While these studies underline the importance of endogenous factors for constitutive transporter expression, the situation in recombinant systems (i.e., transgenic animals or transfected cell lines) may be further complicated as a consequence of the artificial introduction of the transport system of interest. Recently, it was demonstrated that MRP2 transporter-deficient rats have significantly up-regulated and functionally relevant expression levels of p-glycoprotein at the blood-brain barrier, ultimately influencing the brain distribution of phenobarbital.3 Interestingly though, the over-expression of human MRP2 in MDCKII cells is associated with a significant increase in endogenous p-glycoprotein levels.4 These examples are representative of the disparity in the drug-transporter interactions which exist between the in vitro and in vivo model systems.

We hypothesize that endogenous transporter expression and function may be altered in recombinant transport models and may confound the functional assessment of the recombinant drug transporter model of interest. Therefore, for some substrates, it may become a prerequisite to further define the expression and function of endogenous (constitutive) transporters in order to properly characterize the transport processes.

In this study, we have characterized the impact of bcrp1 transporter over-expression on the transport of the cations agmatine, TEA, and choline. Our results illustrate how the introduction of the efflux transporter bcrp1 modulates the expression and functionality of endogenous OCT2 for a variety of organic cations.

Materials and methods

[3H]-agmatine (60 Ci/mmol) and [14C]-choline chloride (methyl-14C) (55 mCi/mmol) was obtained from American Radiolabeled Chemicals (St. Louis, MO). [3H]-TEA chloride (88 Ci/mmol) and [3H]-prazosin (7-methoxy-3H) (85 Ci/mmol) were purchased from Moravek Biochemicals (Brea, CA) and Perkin-Elmer (Boston, MA), respectively. Ko143 was kindly donated by Dr. Alfred H. Schinkel, The Netherlands Cancer Institute (Amsterdam, Netherlands). Ko143 was solubilized in DMSO (Sigma-Aldrich, Inc., Saint Louis, MO) and diluted with assay buffer (NaCl 122 mM, NaHCO3 25 mM, Glucose 10 mM, HEPES 10 mM, KCl 3mM, MgSO4·7H20 1.2 mM, CaCl2·H20 1.4 mM, K2HPO4 0.4 mM). The final concentration of DMSO in all solutions (including control group) was less than 0.1%. Unlabeled agmatine and TEA were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Inc. (St. Louis, MO).

Cell culture

Wild-type and bcrp1-transfected MDCKII cells were kindly provided by Dr. Alfred H. Schinkel, The Netherlands Cancer Institute.5 Cells used for all experiments were between passages 5 and 15. MDCKII cells were cultured in DMEM (Mediatech, Inc., Herndon, VA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (SeraCare Life Sciences, Inc., Oceanside, CA), penicillin (100 U/mL) and streptomycin (100 μg/mL) (Sigma-Aldrich, Inc., St. Louis, MO). Wild-type and human OCT2-transfected HEK293 cells were cultured under identical conditions as MDCKII cells, with the addition of hygromycin B (60 μg/mL) (EMD Chemicals, San Diego, CA). All other cell culture materials were obtained from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA).

Intracellular accumulation in MDCKII cells

Wild-type and bcrp1-transfected cells were seeded at a density of 2 × 105 per well and grown for 3 to 4 days on 12-well plates (TPP® tissue culture plates) to form confluent monolayers. For accumulation experiments, the growth media was aspirated and the cells in each well were washed twice with 1 mL of assay buffer, followed by a pre-incubation for at least 30 minutes with 1 mL of blank assay buffer. The accumulation experiment involved incubation of cells for 120 minutes at 37 °C in assay buffer (1 mL) containing tracer concentrations of the radiolabeled agmatine, TEA, choline, or prazosin. [3H]-prazosin accumulation was used as a positive control to verify bcrp1-mediated efflux functionality. Assay buffer containing radiolabeled drug was aspirated at the end of incubation period and the cells were washed three times with 1 mL of ice-cold phosphate buffered saline. Cells were then solubilized in 500 μL of M-PER® (Mammalian Protein Extraction Regent) (Pierce Biotechnology, Inc, Rockford, IL.). Total protein concentration in each well was determined by the BCA™ protein assay (Pierce Biotechnology, Inc., Rockford, IL) and the corresponding radioactivity was determined by liquid scintillation counting (LS-6500, Beckman Coulter, Inc., Fullerton, CA).

Intracellular accumulation in HEK293 Cells

Accumulation experiments were carried out in wild-type and hOCT2-HEK293 (generously provided by Dr. K. Giacomini-UCSF) cell monolayers grown on 12-well BD BioCoat™ PDL plates. Cultured HEK293 cells were washed 3 times with 1 mL of blank assay buffer and then pre-incubated for 30 minutes at 37 °C with blank assay buffer solution. Cell media was aspirated and the accumulation experiment was initiated with the addition of 1 mL of assay buffer containing [3H]-agmatine with 0 or 500 μM unlabeled TEA. [3H]-TEA uptake was also investigated as a positive-control for hOCT2-mediated transport effects. Following a 120-minute incubation, assay buffer was aspirated and cells were washed two to three times with ice-cold PBS. A 500 μL volume of M-PER® was then added to each well and incubated for at least 45 minutes on an orbital shaker at 37 °C. Total protein concentration in each well was determined by the BCA™ protein assay (Pierce Biotechnology, Inc., Rockford, IL) and the corresponding radioactivity was determined by liquid scintillation counting (LS-6500, Beckman Coulter, Inc., Fullerton, CA).

Directional transport experiments

Wild-type and bcrp1-transfected MDCKII cells were seeded at a density of 2 × 105 per well and grown for 3 to 4 days on separate Transwell® permeable supports (Corning Inc., Corning, NY) until they formed a confluent polarized monolayer. The upper compartment of the Transwell® was referred to as the apical (A) and the lower compartment as the basolateral (B) side. For the transport experiment, growth medium was aspirated and cells were washed twice before being pre-incubated in assay buffer for 30 minutes. The assay buffer was then aspirated and replaced on the donor side with buffer containing tracer quantities of radiolabeled agmatine. Fresh drug-free assay buffer was placed on the receiver side. The assay plates were incubated on an orbital shaker (60 rpm) at 37 °C for the entire duration of the experiment, except while sampling. 200 μL samples were drawn from the receiver side at 0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes and replaced with fresh drug-free assay buffer. Similarly, 200 μL samples were drawn from the donor side at 0 and 120 minutes, and replaced with the assay buffer containing radiolabeled agmatine at the initial donor concentration.

Apparent directional permeabilities (Papp, either in the A-to-B or B-to-A direction) for agmatine were calculated from the permeability equation (Eq. 1) using slopes obtained from the amount transported vs. time plots,

Papp=dQ/dtAC0 Equation 1

where A is the membrane surface area, C0 is initial concentration in donor compartment, and dQ/dt is the slope of the amount transported vs. time profile.

Quantitative Real-Time PCR

Total cellular RNA was extracted from MDCKII using mini RNeasy kit and cDNA was synthesized using Omniscript RT kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Total RNA amount per reaction was normalized before RT reaction by measuring the absorbance at 260 nm. Primers were designed using Primer 3 software and synthesized at AGAC (Advanced Genetic Analysis Center, University of Minnesota). Beta-actin was chosen as the housekeeping gene. Primer sequences are listed in Table 1. Real-time PCR was performed using the Stratagene MX3000P system (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) using SYBR Green detection. The amplification conditions were 95 °C for 10 minutes followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 30 seconds, 55 °C for 1 minute, and 72 °C for 30 seconds. The fold difference in expression of mRNA was calculated from the Ct values as previously described.6

Table 1.

Primer sequences for QT-PCR

Gene Forward Reverse Gene bank No. Source
OCT2 gtggctgcaggtcactgtta caggtctgaggctctgaagg AY028623 Canine
OCT3 aggacctggctgtggtattg ccaaatccgtgctttgtttt NM_11395 Canine
beta-actin actgggacgacatggagaag acatacatggctggggtgtt AF021873 Canine
bcrp1 agcagcaaggaaagatccaa cccatcacaacgtcatcttg AF140218 Murine

Western blotting

Total protein extraction

MDCKII cells were harvested after reaching confluence in 75 mL flasks. Total protein was extracted as previous described7 with minor modification. Briefly, cells were washed twice with cold PBS containing 1% protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich), scraped into 1.5 mL of PBS, and poured into a reaction tube. This was then followed by a short centrifugation (15 s, 14000 rpm). The supernatant was discarded and the pellet (∼1×107 cells) was resuspended in 80 μL of lysis buffer (600 mM KCl, 20 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.8, 20% glycerol, 1% protease inhibitor cocktail). The suspension was briefly frozen in liquid N2 and allowed to thaw slowly on ice (about 10 min) for three repetitions. After a 10 s vortex, 250 U of Benzonase (Merck) was added to digest the DNA. The cell lysate was incubated at room temperature for 10 minutes. The protein concentration was measured using the BCA method and lysates were stored at -80 °C.

Western blot with chemiluminescence detection

Total lysates were thawed and resuspended in Laemmli buffer. After heating for 5 min at 95 °C, samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE (7.5%) at room temperature at 120 V for 1 hour. Proteins were transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane (Bio-Rad, CA) at 350 mA for 3 hours at 4 °C. Nonspecific binding sites were blocked by incubation with 5% skimmed milk in TBST buffer [20 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 0.2 mol/L NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20] for 1 hour at room temperature. The membrane was incubated with OCT2 primary antibody (1:100, sc-19814, Santa Cruz) overnight. After washing three times for 10 min with washing solution, the membrane was treated with donkey anti-goat IgG-HRP secondary antibody (1:2000, Santa Cruz), followed by further washing with TBST buffer solution (three times for 10 min). Detection was done using a commercial chemiluminescence kit (Amersham). Band-intensity on the x-ray film was determined by densitometry using an UVP Bioimaging system (UVP EBi Chemi II, UVP, CA) and analyzed using Excel (Microsoft, US). The OCT2 signals were expressed relative to the signal of the housekeeping protein beta-actin.

Statistical analysis

Experimental groups were compared using one-way ANOVA with the Tukey test for multiple comparisons, unless otherwise noted. Differences were considered to be statistically significant at p < 0.05.

Results

Intracellular accumulation in MDCKII and HEK293 cells

In order to verify the functionality of the transfected bcrp1 transporter, the intracellular uptake of [3H]-prazosin, a prototypical BCRP efflux substrate, was performed in both wild-type and bcrp1 MDCKII cells. Following 120-minute incubation, intracellular prazosin was significantly decreased (p < 0.01) in bcrp1-transfected MDCKII cells as compared to wild-type cells (Figure 1). However, the intracellular uptake of the organic cation agmatine was significantly elevated in bcrp1-transfected cells (p < 0.001), and was not significantly influenced by the BCRP specific inhibitor Ko143, in either cell type (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Accumulation of [3H]-prazosin and [3H]-agmatine in MDCKII cells.

Figure 1

[3H]-prazosin accumulation was significantly reduced in the bcrp1-transfected cells. In contrast, agmatine accumulation increased significantly. Ko143 (200 nM) had no effect on agmatine accumulation in wild-type and bcrp1-transfected MDCKII cells. Results are expressed as mean ± S.D (n = 3) (**p < 0.01, compared to wild-type control group)

In bcrp1-transfected cells, the addition of unlabeled TEA, a prototypical substrate of OCTs, showed a concentration dependent inhibition on agmatine accumulation, with maximal inhibition achieved at 2 mM (Figure 2). The approximate IC50 of TEA was 200 μM. [3H]-agmatine accumulation in wild-type MDCKII cells was not influenced by the OCT substrate TEA (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Influence of TEA on [3H]-agmatine accumulation in MDCKII cells.

Figure 2

[3H]-agmatine accumulation was unchanged in wild-type cells in the presence of TEA. Agmatine accumulation in bcrp1 cells decreased significantly with the increasing concentrations of prototypical OCT substrate TEA. Results are expressed as mean ± S.D (n = 3). (**p < 0.01, comparing with bcrp1 control group)

In hOCT2-HEK293 cells, steady-state agmatine accumulation was found to be 22-fold greater (p < 0.001) than in wild-type HEK293 cells (Figure 3). The addition of 500 μM unlabeled TEA resulted in a 28% (p < 0.01) and 76% (p < 0.001) decrease in agmatine uptake in wild-type and hOCT2-HEK293 cells, respectively. As a positive control, the cellular accumulation of TEA was measured in both wild-type and hOCT2-HEK293 cells. Steady-state TEA uptake was 36% higher (p < 0.05) in hOCT2-HEK293 cells as compared to wild-type cells (Figure 3). Concentration-dependent uptake of agmatine was saturable in both hOCT1- and hOCT2-HEK cells, with an approximate Km of 30 mM and 2 mM, respectively (data not shown).

Figure 3. Steady-state accumulation of [3H]-agmatine and [3H]-TEA in HEK Cells.

Figure 3

Steady-state agmatine uptake was significantly greater in hOCT2-HEK293 cells as compared to wild-type counterparts. The addition of 500 μM unlabeled TEA significantly inhibited agmatine uptake in hOCT2-HEK293 cells. As a positive control, the cellular accumulation of TEA was measured in both wild-type and hOCT2-HEK293 cells. Steady-state TEA uptake was significantly higher in hOCT2-HEK293 cells as compared to levels in wild-type cells. Results are expressed as mean ± S.D (n = 3). (*p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001 comparing with wild-type group; #p < 0.001 comparing with hOCT2 agmatine group)

In a follow-up experiment, the intracellular accumulation of agmatine, and the organic cations TEA and choline were investigated in wild-type and bcrp1 MDCKII cells. As expected, the intracellular accumulation of the prototypical bcrp1 substrate prazosin was significantly decreased (p < 0.01) in bcrp1-transfected MDCKII cells as compared to wild-type cells. However, in contrast to our findings with prazosin, and consistent with the data in Figures 1 and 2, steady-state uptake of [3H]-TEA and [14C]-choline was also significantly elevated in bcrp1-transfected cells, as compared to wild-type MDCKII cells (p < 0.01) (Figure 4). These data suggested the up-regulation of an organic cation influx transport system, such as OCT2, in bcrp1-transfected MDCKII cells compared to the wild-type cells.

Figure 4. Steady-state uptake of several organic cations in MDCKII cells.

Figure 4

Intracellular accumulation of radiolabeled organic cations agmatine, TEA, and choline was significantly increased in bcrp1-transfected MDCKII cells, as compared to wild-type cells, consistent with the observed increase in OCT2 expression. Prazosin uptake, a representative positive control for bcrp1-mediated efflux, was significantly decreased in bcrp1 cells as compared to wild-type counterparts. Results are expressed as mean ± S.D (n = 3). (*p < 0.01 comparing with wild-type group)

Quantitative Real-Time PCR and Western Blot

Quantitative RT-PCR was employed to quantify OCT2 and OCT3 mRNA levels in the two MDCKII cell lines (Figure 5). Successful bcrp1 gene transfection was confirmed by the abundance of bcrp1 mRNA levels in transfected cells. In bcrp1-transfected MDCKII cells, OCT2 mRNA was 10-fold higher than in wild-type cells. There was no difference in OCT3 mRNA levels between the two cell types (Figure 5). All reactions yielded only the expected product as determined by sequence analysis and single peaks in the dissociation curves.

Figure 5. mRNA levels of OCT2, OCT3, and BCRP in MDCKII cells.

Figure 5

OCT2 and OCT3 mRNA levels in two MDCKII cell lines were determined by quantitative RT-PCR. Beta-actin was employed as a housekeeping gene; murine BCRP (bcrp1) was used as positive control. Transporter mRNA levels were normalized to their expression in wild-type cells. BCRP and OCT2 mRNA levels were much higher in bcrp1-transfected MDCKII cells, with little change in OCT3. The data are expressed as the mean ± S.D from three independent experiments.

Western blots were then carried out to determine whether increases in OCT2 protein expression were correlated with the correspondent increase in organic cation intracellular accumulation in bcrp1-transfected MDCKII cells. Indeed, OCT2 protein expression was significantly greater in bcrp1-transfected MDCKII cells (Figure 6), with densitometry analysis revealing a 3.5-fold greater OCT2/beta-actin ratio in bcrp1-transfected cells as compared to wild-type MDCKII cells.

Figure 6. OCT2 protein expression in WT- and bcrp1-MDCKII cells.

Figure 6

Western blotting was used to investigate OCT2 protein expression in MDCKII cells. (Top) Left: OCT2 band in wild-type MDCKII cells; Right: OCT2 band in bcrp1-MDCKII cells. (Bottom) Left: beta-actin band in wild-type MDCKII cells; Right: beta-actin band in bcrp1-MDCKII cells. OCT2 protein expression was ∼ 3.5-fold higher in bcrp1-transfected cells than in wild-type cells. Two different total protein concentrations (35 and 175 μg/well) were analyzed individually, with similar findings in each.

Directional transport experiments

In order to investigate the functional relevance of OCT2 in an in vitro barrier system, we characterized the directional flux of agmatine across cell monolayers. Permeability experiments revealed a significant difference in [3H]-agmatine apical to basolateral (A-to-B) directional flux between wild-type and bcrp1-transfected cell monolayers. Wild-type cell agmatine A-to-B flux was significantly greater than in bcrp1-transfected cells, with no apparent differences in their B-to-A flux (Figure 7). The apparent permeabilities (Papp) in each direction were calculated according to Equation 1. In both wild-type and bcrp1-transfected cells, the A-to-B Papp values were significantly higher than in the B-to-A direction, implying the involvement of one or more active influx transporters (Figure 8). The A-to-B Papp values in bcrp1 cells were significantly lower than wild-type counterparts, resulting in a decrease in the net influx ratio (A-to-B/B-to-A) (Table 2). These results suggest that OCT2, amongst other transporters, may influence the overall net inward flux (A-to-B) of organic cations at important biological barriers.

Figure 7. Directional flux of [3H]-agmatine in MDCKII cell monolayers.

Figure 7

The A-to-B flux of radiolabeled agmatine was significantly greater in wild-type cells as compared to bcrp1 cells; the B-to-A flux in the wild-type cells was not different from that in the bcrp1 cells. However, in both the wild-type and bcrp1 cells, the A-to-B flux of tracer agmatine was greater than the B-to-A flux. Results are expressed as mean ± S.D (n = 3).

Figure 8. Schematic of proposed transporters involved in agmatine flux in MDCKII cells.

Figure 8

At the apical side of MDCKII cells, agmatine permeability is mainly influenced by active influx transporters; the transcellular transport dominates this process resulting in a greater A-to-B than B-to-A transport. However, when bcrp1 is introduced in MDCKII cells, basolateral OCT2 expression is up-regulated, resulting in an enhancement of basolateral agmatine accumulation and a corresponding decrease in agmatine A-to-B net flux.

Table 2.

Directional Permeability of [3H]-agmatine in MDCKII Cell Monolayers

Papp (10 -6 cm/s) A-to-B B-to-A Influx Ratio
(A-to-B/B-to A)
WT-MDCKII 24.4 ± 1.5** 3.29 ± 0.02 7.41
bcrp1-MDCKII 18.6 ± 0.6**!! 3.35 ± 0.01 5.54##
**

p < 0.01 compared with respective B-to-A permeability

!!

p < 0.01 compared with WT A-to-B permeability

##

p < 0.01 compared with WT influx ratio

Results are expressed as mean ± S.D. (n = 3)

Discussion

The expression and functional ramifications of constitutively-expressed transport systems have not been well characterized in recombinant drug transporter models. In this study it was found that over-expression of the efflux transporter bcrp1 was associated with endogenous expression of the influx transporter OCT2, ultimately influencing the directional transport of agmatine and the intracellular uptake of several organic cations.

Our initial motivation for this study was to characterize the impact of bcrp1 over-expression on agmatine influx transport. Agmatine, decarboxylated l-arginine, displays many of the classical characteristics of a neurotransmitter,8 and accordingly, has been demonstrated to have neuroprotective effects during NMDA-receptor mediated excitotoxic cellular injury.9,10 In addition, studies have demonstrated agmatine's efficacy in inhibiting polyamine-induced tumor cell proliferation.11,12 Transport at the level of the blood-brain barrier and in the brain parenchyma may therefore have important physiological consequences for the distribution and function of agmatine in the central nervous system.

Due to its dicationic nature, and close structural and metabolic relation to the polyamines, two influx transport systems have been implicated in agmatine transport processes; organic cation transporters 2 and 3 (OCT2/OCT3) and the putative “polyamine transport system (PTS).”13,14 Reduced PTS activity has been ascribed to the over-expression of the ABC-family efflux transporter MDR115 and may have important consequences toward agmatine transport phenomenon. In the present study, we unexpectedly found that intracellular agmatine accumulation was significantly enhanced in ABC-family bcrp1-transfected MDCKII cells, a process which was unaffected by the BCRP specific inhibitor Ko143 (Figure 1). These findings suggested the presence of an up-regulated influx transport system responsible for the enhancement of agmatine uptake in the bcrp1-transfected cells. As a consequence of the lack of knowledge of the gene sequence for the PTS, we focused our investigation on the expression and function of the influx transporters OCT2 and OCT3.

Findings from QT-PCR revealed a ten-fold increase in OCT2 mRNA levels in bcrp1-transfected cells versus wild-type cells, with little or no change in OCT3 (Figure 5). Furthermore, western-blotting confirmed that OCT2 protein expression was also much greater in bcrp1-transfected cells (Figure 6). While these data support OCT2 as the likely transport system involved in the increase of agmatine accumulation in bcrp1-transfected cells, they do not rule out the possibility of changes in the expression and/or functionality of the PTS, or for that matter, changes in any other relevant SLC-family cation transporters.

Thus, we wanted to explore whether a prototypical OCT substrate, TEA, would modulate the enhanced agmatine uptake observed in bcrp1-transfected cells. As anticipated, treatment of bcrp1 cells with increasing concentrations of TEA caused a significant reduction in intracellular agmatine accumulation, consistent with the involvement of OCTs in agmatine uptake in bcrp1-MDCKII cells (Figure 2). This observation was not seen in the wild-type cells, a result which is likely attributable to the low expression of OCT2. In addition, and in accordance with our findings in bcrp1-transfected cells, was the observation that steady-state agmatine and TEA accumulation was also significantly enhanced in hOCT2-transfected HEK293 cells; a process that was also significantly competed by the OCT substrate TEA (Figure 3). While the participation of OCT1 cannot be ruled out from the current observations, our data suggest that the ∼15-fold higher affinity of OCT2 for agmatine, as compared to OCT1, makes OCT2 more functionally relevant than OCT1. Currently, there are no data in the literature indicating that TEA is either a substrate or inhibitor of the PTS, and therefore, the current results suggest that agmatine and TEA share a common influx transport system, OCT2, in bcrp1-transfected cells.

Recently, single carbon donors, such as choline, and related lipotropes, have been shown to selectively inhibit the proliferation of breast cancer epithelial cells in vitro.16 For that reason, we were also interested in whether bcrp1 over-expression influenced the intracellular uptake of the organic cations choline and TEA. Consistent with our observations for agmatine, both radiolabeled choline and TEA intracellular uptake were significantly increased in bcrp1-transfected cells (Figure 4). Collectively, these data supported the claim that the up-regulation of endogenous OCT2 was likely responsible for the enhancement of organic cation uptake in bcrp1-transfected MDCKII cells.

Intracellular accumulation studies provide basic information with regard to drug-transporter interactions, but give little detail with regard to drug permeability at physiological barriers (i.e., the blood-brain barrier, renal brush border membrane, etc.). Therefore, we set out to examine whether agmatine directional transport was altered in bcrp1-transfected cells. As shown in Figure 7, the A-to-B directional flux of agmatine was significantly lower in bcrp1-tranfected cells, a result that may be attributable to the basolateral localization of OCT2 in MDCKII cells.17,18 Also noteworthy was the significant A-to-B directionality of agmatine observed in the MDCKII cells (Figure 7). This robust flux component may be attributable to unidentified active influx transporters in the apical membrane of MDCKII cells (Figure 8), such as the putative PTS.19 In spite of the observed ten-fold increase in OCT2 in bcrp1-transfected cells, we observed only a partial reversal of agmatine A-to-B directional flux (Figure 7). Taken together, the decrease in agmatine A-to-B net flux in OCT2 up-regulated bcrp1-transfected cells is consistent with the basolateral functionality of OCT2 in MDCKII cells. In addition, this observation may translate into a process by which agmatine is actively reabsorbed in the renal proximal tubule, in order to preserve endogenous agmatine.

The link between bcrp1 over-expression and OCT2 mRNA and protein up-regulation in MDCKII cells remains unclear. It is possible that this phenomenon acts as compensatory mechanism to counteract the efflux activity of BCRP, in order to maintain intracellular homeostasis. In other words, the up-regulation of OCT2 may act to replenish lost intracellular moieties as a result of BCRP-mediated efflux.

A strong association exists linking the expression of ABCG2 (BCRP) in cancer cells and their resistance to anti-neoplastic compounds. The expression of BCRP also functions to efflux vital methyl donor nutrients, such as folate, which are known to have modulatory roles in epigenetic-related events, including cellular proliferation.20 While folic acid is not a demonstrated substrate of OCT2, evidence suggests that endogenous choline is transported quite effectively by OCT2 in vivo.21 With reports of significantly increased OCT2 expression in breast cancer epithelial cells, as compared to normal human epithelial counterparts,22 the present observations may represent crucial evidence connecting anti-neoplastic cellular resistance, in part due to BCRP, and the augmentation of choline uptake and phosphocholine synthesis in cancer cells.23

Previously, we hypothesized that an active influx transport system was present and functional for the anti-neoplastic drug mitoxantrone in bcrp1-transfected MDCKII cells.24 The present study is consistent with these findings, and provides further evidence linking the over-expression of the efflux transporter bcrp1, with the up-regulation of influx transporter expression and function in MDCKII cells. While it is a possible that variability in the cloning process may have influenced constitutive OCT2 expression in our wild-type MDCKII system, the fact that the wild-type MDCKII cells were transfected with a blank vector suggest that the change in OCT2 expression is related to the high expression of bcrp1, and not simply induction by the transfection itself.6,25 Considering that breast cancer cells have high constitutive expression of BCRP,26 we hypothesize that the increase in OCT2 expression may be a direct consequence of BCRP expression. Therefore, OCT2-mediated transport may lead to a complex balance between influx and efflux of cationic anti-neoplastic compounds in tumors expressing BCRP.

Our findings also illustrate an important caveat when using a recombinant cell culture system for transporter characterization. In recombinant cell models, complex factors such as multiple and/or competing transport systems must be taken into account while exploring the contributions of the individual transport system of interest. A comprehensive transporter characterization and screening must therefore consider the expression of endogenous transport systems for optimal data interpretation and experimental planning and development.

The significance of our preliminary findings, and their possible translation into an in vivo system, may reveal altered drug action and in vivo disposition for therapeutic compounds, such as cimetidine, which are dual substrates of BCRP and OCT2.27,28 In addition, our data revealing enhanced choline uptake in bcrp1 over-expressing cells is also of interest. If the expression of OCT2 and BCRP are indeed linked, then the clinical diagnostic of choline as a biomarker of tumor malignancy29 may be partly explained by the presence of BCRP, with up-regulated OCT2 serving to replace vital methyl donor nutrients. The significance of these findings warrants further investigation. Of particular interest would be to investigate the ramifications of OCT2 over-expression toward BCRP expression/function, and examine whether BCRP knockout animals demonstrate organic cation mediated systemic toxicity. For these reasons, a better appreciation of the contributions of both active influx and efflux transporters is together relevant and fundamental for understanding the delivery and therapeutic efficacy of drugs at their intracellular sites of action.30,24

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by a grant from the National Institutes of Health [NS42549]; and the PharmacoNeuroImmunology training program from National Institute on Drug Abuse [T32DA007097]. We thank Dr. Kathleen Giacomini for kindly providing the stably-transfected HEK-293 cells and Dr. Alfred Schinkel for generously providing us with the transfected MDCKII cells.

References

  • 1.Mochizuki T, Satsu H, Shimizu M. Tumor necrosis factor alpha stimulates taurine uptake and transporter gene expression in human intestinal Caco-2 cells. FEBS Lett. 2002;517:92–96. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(02)02584-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Urakami Y, Okuda M, Saito H, Inui K. Hormonal regulation of organic cation transporter OCT2 expression in rat kidney. FEBS Lett. 2000;473:173–176. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(00)01525-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hoffmann K, Loscher W. Upregulation of brain expression of P-glycoprotein in MRP2-deficient TR(-) rats resembles seizure-induced up-regulation of this drug efflux transporter in normal rats. Epilepsia. 2007;48(4):631–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00939.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Raggers RJ, Vogels I, van Meer G. Upregulation of the expression of endogenous Mdr1 P-glycoprotein enhances lipid translocation in MDCK cells transfected with human MRP2. Histochem Cell Biol. 2002;117(2):181–5. doi: 10.1007/s00418-001-0352-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jonker JW, Smit JW, Brinkhuis RF, Maliepaard M, Beijnen JH, Schellens JH, Schinkel AH. Role of breast cancer resistance protein in the bioavailability and fetal penetration of topotecan. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:1651–1656. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.20.1651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rudolph C, Adam G, Simm A. Determination of copy number of c-Myc protein per cell by quantitative Western blotting. Anal Biochem. 1999;269:66–71. doi: 10.1006/abio.1999.3095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Reis DJ, Regunathan S. Is agmatine a novel neurotransmitter in brain? Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2000;21(5):187–93. doi: 10.1016/s0165-6147(00)01460-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Qiu WW, Zheng RY. Neuroprotective effects of receptor imidazoline 2 and its endogenous ligand agmatine. Neurosci Bull. 2006;22(3):187–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wang WP, Iyo AH, Miguel-Hidalgo J, Regunathan S, Zhu MY. Agmatine protects against cell damage induced by NMDA and glutamate in cultured hippocampal neurons. Brain Res. 2006;1084:210–216. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.02.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wang JF, Su RB, Wu N, Xu B, Lu XQ, Liu Y, Li J. Inhibitory effect of agmatine on proliferation of tumor cells by modulation of polyamine metabolism. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2005;26:616–622. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Isome M, Lortie MJ, Murakami Y, Parisi E, Matsufuji S, Satriano J. The antiproliferative effects of agmatine correlates with the rate of cellular proliferation. American J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2007;293:C705–11. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00084.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Grundemann D, Hahne C, Berkels R, Schomig E. Agmatine is efficiently transported by non-neuronal monoamine transporters extraneuronal monoamine transporter (OCT3) and organic cation transporter 2 (OCT2) J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2003;304:810–817. doi: 10.1124/jpet.102.044404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Satriano J, Isome M, Casero RA, Jr, Thomson SC, Blantz RC. Polyamine transport system mediates agmatine transport in mammalian cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2001;281:C329–334. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.2001.281.1.C329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Aziz SM, Worthen DR, Yatin M, Ain KB, Crooks PA. A unique interaction between polyamine and multidrug resistance (P-glycoprotein) transporters in cultured Chinese hamster ovary cells transfected with mouse mdr-1 gene. Biochem Pharmacol. 1998;56:181–187. doi: 10.1016/s0006-2952(98)00132-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Park CS, Cho K, Bae DR, Joo NE, Kim HH, Mabasa L, Fowler AW. Methyl-donor nutrients inhibit breast cancer cell growth. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2008;44(7):268–72. doi: 10.1007/s11626-008-9096-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sweet DH, Miller DS, Pritchard JB. Basolateral localization of organic cation transporter 2 in intact renal proximal tubules. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2002;279:F826–834. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.2000.279.5.F826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Shu Y, Bello CL, Mangravite LM, Feng B, Giacomini KM. Functional characteristics and steroid hormone-mediated regulation of an organic cation transporter in Madin-Darby canine kidney cells. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2001;299:392–398. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Milovic V, Stein J, Piiper A, Gerhard R, Zeuzem S, Caspary WF. Characterization of putrescine transport across the intestinal epithelium: study using isolated brush border and basolateral membrane vesicles of the enterocyte. Eur J Clin Invest. 1995;2:97–105. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.1995.tb01533.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ifergan I, Assaraf YG. Molecular mechanims of adaption to folate deficiency. Vitam Horm. 2008;79:99–143. doi: 10.1016/S0083-6729(08)00404-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sweet DH, Miller DS, Pritchard JB. Ventricular choline transport, a role for organic cation transporter 2 expressed in choroid plexus. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:41611–41619. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M108472200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Eliyahu G, Kreizman T, Degani H. Phosphocholine as a biomarker of breast cancer: molecular and biochemical studies. Int J Cancer. 2007;120:1721–1730. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Katz-Brull R, Seger D, Rivenson-Segal D, Rushkin E, Degani H. Metabolic markers of breast cancer: enhanced choline metabolism and reduced choline-ether-phospholipid synthesis. Cancer Research. 2002;62:1966–1970. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pan G, Elmquist WF. Mitoxantrone permeability in MDCKII cells is influenced by active influx transport. Mol Pharm. 2007;4:475. doi: 10.1021/mp060083b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Robey RW, Honjo Y, Morisaki K, Nadjem TA, Runge S, Risbood M, Poruchynsky MS, Bates SE. Mutations at amino-acid 482 in the ABCG2 gene affect substrate and antagonist specificity. Br J Cancer. 2003;89:1971–1978. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Doyle LA, Yang W, Abruzzo LV, Krogmann T, Gao Y, Rishi AK, Ross DD. A multidrug resistance transporter from human MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:15665–15670. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.26.15665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pavek P, Merino G, Wagenaar E, Bolscher E, Novotna M, Jonker JW, Schinkel AH. Human breast cancer resistance protein: interactions with steroid drugs, hormones, the dietary carcinogen 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo(4,5-b)pyridine, and transport of cimetidine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2005;2(1):144–52. doi: 10.1124/jpet.104.073916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Barendt WM, Wright SH. The human organic cation transporter (hOCT2) recognizes the degree of substrate ionization. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(25):22491–6. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M203114200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Katz-Brull R, Lavin PT, Lenkinski RE. Clinical utility of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in characterizing breast lesions. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94(16):1197–203. doi: 10.1093/jnci/94.16.1197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Cullinane C, Dorow DS, Kansara M, Conus N, Binns D, Hicks RJ, Ashman LK, McArthur GA, Thomas DM. An in vivo tumor model exploiting metabolic response as a biomarker for targeted drug development. Cancer Res. 2005;65:9633–9636. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES