Skip to main content
The Journal of Clinical Investigation logoLink to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
. 2003 Dec 1;112(11):1636–1638. doi: 10.1172/JCI20408

Genes required for B cell development

Mary Ellen Conley 1,1
PMCID: PMC281652  PMID: 14660738

Abstract

Mutations in a variety of genes can cause congenital agammaglobulinemia and a failure of B cell development. The currently known genes encode components of the pre–B cell receptor or proteins that are activated by cross-linking of the pre–B cell receptor. Defects in these genes result in a block in B cell differentiation at the pro–B to pre–B cell transition. A patient with a translocation involving a previously unknown gene, LRRC8, demonstrated a block at exactly the same point in B cell differentiation (see the related article beginning on page 1707). It will be interesting to determine whether the protein encoded by this gene interacts with the pre–B cell receptor signal transduction pathway or is involved in a new pathway.


B cell maturation proceeds through a series of stages that can be defined by the rearrangement status of the Ig genes, the expression of cell surface markers, and the location of the cells within the bone marrow, the spleen, or the lymph nodes (13). Patients with defects in early B cell maturation usually develop recurrent infections, caused by encapsulated bacteria, in the first 2 years of life, and most are recognized to have immunodeficiency when they are hospitalized for a dramatic infection at less than 3 years of age (4). Approximately 80% of patients with the early onset of recurrent infections, hypogammaglobulinemia, and markedly reduced or absent B cells have X-linked agammaglobulinemia (XLA) (5). This disorder is caused by mutations in a hematopoietic-specific cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase, Btk (6, 7). Btk is expressed in myeloid cells, in platelets, and at all stages of B cell development except plasma cells (810); however, it is important to note that patients with XLA have absent or markedly reduced numbers of B cells but do not have any clinical abnormalities in myeloid cells or in platelet number or function.

The earliest point in B cell differentiation at which Btk is required coincides with expression of the pre–B cell receptor at the pro–B to pre–B cell transition (11, 12). Therefore, it is not surprising that defects in components of the pre–B cell receptor account for an additional 7–10% of patients with congenital agammaglobulinemia. The majority of these patients have mutations in the constant region of μ heavy chain Ig (13), but a small number have defects in λ5 (14), which is part of the surrogate light chain, or in Igα (15), a transmembrane protein that binds to μ heavy chain and acts as part of the signal transduction module. Expression of these proteins is limited to the B cell lineage. Downstream targets of activation through the pre–B cell or B cell receptor complex include Btk and B cell linker (BLNK), a scaffold protein that binds Btk, PLCγ2, Grb2, Vav, and Nck. Two patients with agammaglobulinemia and defects in BLNK have been identified (ref. 16and unpublished results). Patients with defects in components of the pre–B cell receptor, Btk, or BLNK all have a block in B cell differentiation at the pro–B to pre–B cell transition (17) (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Early stages of B cell differentiation can be identified by the status of the Ig genes and by the cell surface markers CD34, CD19, and surface Ig (sIg). In stem cells and common lymphoid precursors, the Ig genes are in germ-line configuration. These cells express CD34 but not CD19 or sIg. In pro–B cells, cells committed to the B cell lineage, the first step in μ heavy chain gene rearrangement, D-to-J rearrangement, is occurring. All of the components of the pre–B cell receptor except μ heavy chain (the surrogate light chain proteins λ5 and VpreB, and the proteins that constitute the pre–B cell receptor signal transduction module, Igα and Igβ) can be found in the cytoplasm of these cells. Pro–B cells are positive for CD34 and CD19, but they are negative for sIg. Once an effective, in-frame VDJ heavy chain rearrangement has occurred, and the resulting μ heavy chaine light chain genes are in germ-line configuration. These cells express cytoplasmic μ heavy chain and cell surface CD19, but they are negative for CD34 and sIg. After successful rearrangement of a light chain gene, the conventional B-cell receptor can be expressed on the cell surface, and the cell becomes an immature B cell that is positive for CD19 and sIg and negative for CD34.

The remaining 10–15% of patients with the early onset of infections, agammaglobulinemia, and absent B cells represent a heterogeneous group. Some of these patients have myelodysplasia, with hypogammaglobulinemia and reduced numbers of B cells being the first sign of their disease (18). Some patients have subtle T cell defects as well as more severe B cell defects; some have morphologic defects including failure to thrive, microcephaly, and/or abnormalities of the hands and feet (1922); and some are clinically indistinguishable from patients with defects in μ heavy chain. A variety of approaches can be taken to identify the genes that are abnormal in these patients. Murine models of immunodeficiency resulting in decreased or absent B cells can provide some clues (23), but it is important to remember that mutations in the same gene may result in different phenotypes in mice and humans (17). Proteins belonging to the signal transduction pathways activated by cross-linking of the pre–B cell receptor are attractive candidates for analysis, particularly when the expression of the gene of interest is limited to hematopoietic cells. Careful evaluation of an unusual patient can be one of the most rewarding approaches.

In this issue of the JCI, Sawada et al. describe a 17-year-old girl with unusual facial features, agammaglobulinemia, and markedly reduced or absent B cells (24). Karyotype studies revealed a balanced translocation between chromosomes 9 and 20, resulting in the truncation of a novel gene, leucine-rich repeat–containing 8 (LRRC8), normally encoded on the long arm of chromosome 9. This unusual gene consists of only two exons, which encode an 810–amino acid protein with four transmembrane domains and an extracellular carboxy-terminal domain with nine leucine-rich repeats (Figure 2). The translocation occurred between the first and second exons and resulted in the loss of the last two-and-a-half leucine-rich regions and the addition of 35 amino acids from the intronic sequence. Using immunofluorescence staining and RT-PCR, the authors suggest that the gene is expressed in brain, heart, lung, liver, and kidney as well as T cells and B-lineage cells.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(a) Wild-type LRRC8 is an 810–amino acid protein with four transmembrane domains. Both the amino-terminal and carboxy-terminal ends of this protein are extracellular. The carboxy-terminal end contains nine leucine-rich repeats. (b) The mutant LRRC8, produced as a consequence of a translocation that transected the gene between exon 1 and exon 2, lacks the last two-and-a-half leucine-rich repeats and contains 35 amino acids derived from the intron 1 sequence.

Based on the observation that there were no abnormalities in the other allele of LRRC8, and that protein from the normal and abnormal alleles were expressed in white blood cells from the patient, the authors interpret their results as indicating that the mutation had a dominant-suppressor effect on B cell development (24). It is interesting to speculate on how this dominant effect might occur and whether there might be other patients with agammaglobulinemia due to similar mutations. Several mechanisms can explain an autosomal dominant effect. For example, if the last two leucine-rich domains function as self-inhibitory domains, the loss of those domains might result in a constitutively active protein; or, if the protein is part of a multimeric complex that includes more than one copy of the LRRC8 protein, one abnormal allele could alter the function of a majority of complexes. Occasionally, an abnormal protein can change the stability or location of a binding partner and thereby inhibit the ability of the binding protein to function. By reconstituting lethally irradiated mice with bone marrow that had been transfected with a retroviral vector expressing the mutant protein, the authors showed that the mutant protein caused a block at the pro–B to pre–B cell transition (Figure 1). This brings up the possibility that LRRC8 might interact with the pre–B cell receptor in some way. Alternatively, the 35 amino acids derived from the intronic sequence at the carboxy-terminal portion of the mutant LRRC8 might confer on the protein a toxic function similar to that of the polyglutamine tract in trinucleotide repeat disorders.

At this time it is difficult to say whether there are likely to be other patients with congenital immunodeficiency due to defects in LRRC8. The authors note that the gene is broadly expressed and that the gene product can be found on the surface of T cells. A detailed evaluation of T cell function might result in the detection of subtle findings that would allow one to identify similar patients. The authors also describe their patient as having mildly dysmorphic facial features. Because many otherwise normal people have mildly dysmorphic facial features, it is not clear at this time whether the unusual facial features of the individual examined by Sawada et al. (24) are secondary to the defect in LRRC8 or part of her familial inheritance. Finding an abnormal gene in a patient with immunodeficiency is only the first exciting step. The next steps should tell us how LRRC8 functions in the normal immune system.

Footnotes

See the related article beginning on page 1707.

Conflict of interest: The author has declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Nonstandard abbreviations used: X-linked agammaglobulinemia (XLA); B cell linker (BLNK); leucine-rich repeat–containing 8 (LRRC8).

References

  • 1.Rajewsky K. Clonal selection and learning in the antibody system. Nature. 1996; 381:751–758. doi: 10.1038/381751a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Conley ME, Cooper MD. Genetic basis of abnormal B cell development. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 1998; 10:399–406. doi: 10.1016/s0952-7915(98)80112-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hardy RR. B-cell commitment: deciding on the players. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2003; 15:158–165. doi: 10.1016/s0952-7915(03)00012-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Conley ME, Howard V. Clinical findings leading to the diagnosis of X-linked agammaglobulinemia. J. Pediatr. 2002; 141:566–571. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2002.127711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Conley ME, Mathias D, Treadaway J, Minegishi Y, Rohrer J. Mutations in Btk in patients with presumed X-linked agammaglobulinemia. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1998; 62:1034–1043. doi: 10.1086/301828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Vetrie D, et al. The gene involved in X-linked agammaglobulinemia is a member of the src family of protein-tyrosine kinases. Nature. 1993; 361:226–233. doi: 10.1038/361226a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tsukada S, et al. Deficient expression of a B cell cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase in human X-linked agammaglobulinemia. Cell. 1993; 72:279–290. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90667-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Smith CIE, et al. Expression of Bruton's agammaglobulinemia tyrosine kinase gene, BTK, is selectively down-regulated in T lymphocytes and plasma cells. J. Immunol. 1994; 152:557–565. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Genevier HC, et al. Expression of Bruton's tyrosine kinase protein within the B cell lineage. Eur. J. Immunol. 1994; 24:3100–3105. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830241228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Quek LS, Bolen J, Watson SP. A role for Bruton's tyrosine kinase (Btk) in platelet activation by collagen. Curr. Biol. 1998; 8:1137–1140. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(98)70471-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Campana D, Farrant J, Inamdar N, Webster ADB, Janossy G. Phenotypic features and proliferative activity of B cell progenitors in X-linked agammaglobulinemia. J. Immunol. 1990; 145:1675–1680. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nomura K, et al. Genetic defect in human X-linked agammaglobulinemia impedes a maturational evolution of pro-B cells into a later stage of pre-B cells in the B-cell differentiation pathway. Blood. 2000; 96:610–617. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Granados EL, et al. Clinical and molecular analysis of patients with defects in μ heavy chain gene. J. Clin. Invest. 2002; 110:1029–1035. doi:10.1172/JCI200215658. doi: 10.1172/JCI15658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Minegishi Y, et al. Mutations in the human λ5/14.1 gene result in B cell deficiency and agammaglobulinemia. J. Exp. Med. 1998; 187:71–77. doi: 10.1084/jem.187.1.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Minegishi Y, et al. Mutations in Igα (CD79a) result in a complete block in B cell development. J. Clin. Invest. 1999; 104:1115–1121. doi: 10.1172/JCI7696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Minegishi Y, et al. An essential role for BLNK in human B cell development. Science. 1999; 286:1954–1957. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5446.1954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Conley ME, Rohrer J, Rapalus L, Boylin EC, Minegishi Y. Defects in early B-cell development: comparing the consequences of abnormalities in pre-BCR signaling in the human and the mouse. Immunol. Rev. 2000; 178:75–90. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-065x.2000.17809.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Srivannaboon K, Conley ME, Coustan-Smith E, Wang WC. Hypogammaglobulinemia and reduced numbers of B cells in children with myelodysplastic syndrome. J. Pediatr. Hematol. Oncol. 2001; 23:122–125. doi: 10.1097/00043426-200102000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Revy P, et al. A syndrome involving intrauterine growth retardation, microcephaly, cerebellar hypoplasia, B lymphocyte deficiency, and progressive pancytopenia. Pediatrics. 2000; 105:E39. doi: 10.1542/peds.105.3.e39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Verloes A, Dresse MF, Keutgen H, Asplund C, Smith CI. Microphthalmia, facial anomalies, microcephaly, thumb and hallux hypoplasia, and agammaglobulinemia. Am. J. Med. Genet. 2001; 101:209–212. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hoffman HM, Bastian JF, Bird LM. Humoral immunodeficiency with facial dysmorphology and limb anomalies: a new syndrome. Clin. Dysmorphol. 2001; 10:1–8. doi: 10.1097/00019605-200101000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Adderson EE, et al. Growth failure, intracranial calcifications, acquired pancytopenia, and unusual humoral immunodeficiency: a genetic syndrome? Am. J. Med. Genet. 2000; 95:17–20. doi: 10.1002/1096-8628(20001106)95:1<17::aid-ajmg5>3.0.co;2-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Loffert D, et al. Early B-cell development in the mouse: insights from mutations introduced by gene targeting. Immunol. Rev. 1994; 137:135–153. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1994.tb00662.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sawada A, et al. A congenital mutation of the novel gene LRRC8 causes agammaglobulinemia in humans. J. Clin. Invest. 2003; 112:1707–1713. doi:10.1172/JCI200318937. doi: 10.1172/JCI18937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Investigation are provided here courtesy of American Society for Clinical Investigation

RESOURCES