Abstract
The ethanol extracts of Syzygium aromaticum flower bud were tested for anti-nociceptive and anti-inflammatory effects in mice and Wistar rats which were carried out using acetic acid-induced abdominal contractions in mice and formalin-induced hind paw edema in Wistar rats. Three doses of the ethanol extract (50, 100, and 200mg/kg body weight i.p.) were used for both studies. The extract had an LD50 of 565.7 mg/kg body weight intraperitoneally in mice. The extracts produced significant effect (P<0.05) at all the three doses. Similarly, the anti-nociceptive activity produced significant effects (P<0.05) at all the three doses of the extract. The result supports the local use of the plant in painful and inflammatory conditions.
Keywords: Syzygium aromaticum flower bud, anti-inflammatory, anti-nociceptive, Anti-Inflammatory, Acetic acid-induced abdominal constriction
Introduction
Cloves is dried flower bud of Syzygium aromaticum Merr. and Perry. (Myrtaceae), an evergreen tree 10–20 m. in height indigenous to India, Indonesia, Zanzibar, Mauritius and Ceylon They are reddish- brown in colour and have a strong aroma. Cloves has antiseptic, antibacterial, antifungal and antiviral properties (Blumenthal, 1998). The oldest recorded medicinal use of cloves was in China, where it was reported for various ailments as early as 240 BC. Cloves was taken over the centuries for diarrhea, liver, stomach and bowel ailments, and as a stimulant for the nerves (Gordon, 1980).
This research was aimed at investigating the possible anti-nociceptive and anti-inflammatory activities of ethanol extract of the plant, in order to support or refute the claims by traditional herbalists.
Materials and Methods
Collection and preparation of plant materials
A sample of Syzygium aromatucum flower bud was bought commercially from Kaduna central market, Kaduna State, in June 2006. It was identified and authenticated by M. Musa of the Herbarium section of the Department of Biological Sciences, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria. Its voucher specimen number is 13954. The seeds were collected, dried and later ground into paste using laboratory mortar and pestle. The fine powder was extracted with ethanol for 72 h using a soxhlet extractor. The percentage yield of the extract was calculated to be 18.2 % (w/w). The extract was reconstituted in distill water at appropriate concentrations for the various experiments conducted.
Phytochemical screening
The ethanol extract obtained was subjected to preliminary phytochemical screening, to identify the chemical constituents. The methods of analysis employed were those described by Brain and Turner (1974).
Experimental animals
Adult Wistar rats of both sexes weighing between 160–190g and adult Swiss albino mice of both sexes weighing between 20–25g were used for the experiments. The animals were maintained under normal laboratory condition of humidity, temperature (25±2 °C) and light (12 h: 12 h night ) for 7 days, and allowed free access to food and water ad libithum.
Acute toxicity study (LD50)
This was conducted by using the method described by Lorke (1983). In the initial phase, mice were divided into 3 groups of three and treated with the ethanol extract of the plant at doses of 10.0, 100.0 and 1000.0mg extract/kg body weight intraperitoneally (i.p.) and were then observed for 24 hrs for signs of toxicity including death. In the final phase, mice were divided into 4 groups of one mouse each and treated with the ethanol extract at doses of 200, 400, 800 and 1600 mg / kg body weight i.p. The LD50 was calculated from the results of the final phase as the square root of the product of the lowest lethal dose and the highest non-lethal dose, i.e the geometric mean of the consecutive doses which 0 and 100% survival rates were recorded.
Anti-inflammatory activity
Adult Wistar rats were divided into 5 groups of 5 rats in each group. The first group served as negative control (normal saline i.p.) while the second, third and the forth groups received different doses of the extract (50,100 and 200 mg/kg body weight, i.p.) respectively while the fifth group received the reference drug Diclofenac (25mg/kg i.p.). Thirty mins later all the groups were administered 50 µl of a 2.5 % solution of formalin, subcutaneously under the plantar surface of the left hind-paw. An increase in the rats' hind paw linear diameter induced by subplantar injection of formalin was use as the measure of acute inflammation (Winter et al., 1963). The paw diameter was measured with the aid of a vernier caliper at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5h, after the injection of formalin. The difference between the readings at time 1h and different time interval was taken as the thickness of edema (Hess and Milong, 1972).
Analgesic activity
The test was carried out using the method of Koster et al. (1959). Different concentrations of the extract (50, 100, and 200mg/kg.) were given intraperitoneally.Thirty minutes after treatment, the mice were injected intraperitoneally with 0.6 % acetic acid solution to induce characteristic writhing. Piroxicam (20mg/kg i.p) was used as a reference drug while the control group received normal saline. Five minutes after Acetic acid injection, mice were placed in individual cages and the number of abdominal contractions was counted for each mouse for a period of 10 mins. Percentage inhibition of writhing was calculated using the formula:
Statistical analysis
All data were expressed as the mean ± S.E.M. Data was subjected to ANOVA. Differences in means were considered to be significant when P<0.05 as described by Duncan et al.. (1977).
Results
Phytochemical screening of the extract revealed the presence of: flavonoids, resins, glycosides, tannins, saponin and alkaloids. The signs of toxicity were first noticed after 2–6 hours of extract administration. There was decreased locomotor activity and sensitivity to touch and jerking. Also there was decreased feed intake, tachypnoea and prostration after 14 hrs of extracts administration. The median lethal dose (LD50) in mice was calculated to be 565.7 mg/kg
The ethanol extract of S. aromatucum suppressed the paw oedema induced by formalin in rats as shown in Table 1. The extract produced 42, 45 and 52% inhibition respectively. The highest activity was obtained the dose of 200mg/kg. The mean latency of nociceptive responses to abdominal constriction is summarized in Table 2. The extract significantly exerted a protective effect on acetic acid-induced abdominal constriction. The extract produced 75, 66 and 65% inhibition respectively. The highest activity resides at the lowest dose of 50mg/kg.
Table 1.
Treatment groups | Dose | Oedema diameter(cm) | ||||
(n=5) | (mg/kg) | |||||
1h | 2h | 3h | 4h | 5h | ||
Normal Saline | 10ml/kg | 0.734± 0.16 | 0.802±0.125 | 0.784±0.125 | 0.784± | 0.722± |
0.1252 | 0.144 | |||||
Syzygium | 50 | 0.422± | 0.452±0.054 | 0.430±0.0402 | 0.424±0.038 a | 0.416± |
aromaticum | 0.074 a | a | a | 0.042 a | ||
Extract | ||||||
(42 %) | ||||||
Syzygium | 100 | 0.444± | 0.416±0.072 | 0.408±0.0715 | 0.402± 0.693 | 0.398± |
aromaticum | 0.042 a | a | a | a | 0.067 a | |
Extract | (45%) | |||||
Syzygium | 200 | 0.424± | 0.358±0.063 | 0.352± 0.058 a | 0.350± 0.603 | 0.350± |
aromaticum | 0.074 a | a | a | 0.603 a | ||
Extract | (52%) | |||||
Diclofenac | 25 | 0.59± 0.045 | 0.61± 0.045 a | 0.61± 0.0224 a | 0.63± 0.447 a | 0.64± 0.045 |
ns | a | |||||
(11%) |
Each value is mean ±SEM of 5 rats ap<0.05; compared to control NS: statistically not significant
Figures in parentheses represent percentage inhibition of anti-inflammatory activity.
Table 2.
Treatment (i.p.) | Dose (mg/kg) | No. of abdominal | % inhibition |
Contractions | |||
Norma saline | 10ml/kg | 23.8 ±2.41 | - |
Syzygium aromaticum | 50 | 6.0 ±0.77 c | 75% |
Syzygium aromaticum | 100 | 8.0±0.70 a | 66% |
Syzygium aromaticum | 200 | 8.25±3.01 b | 65% |
Piroxicam | 20 | 6.3 ± 1.80c | 74% |
Values of abdominal contraction are mean ± SEM. n =5
Values are statistically significant compared to control
Discussion
The effect of the ethanol extracts of S. aromaticum on anti-inflammatory and analgesic activities were evaluated. The results obtained showed that the extract at the doses of 50 100 and 200mg/kg significantly reduced the number of acetic acid-induced writhes in mice. The activities reside more at the lowest dose of 50mg/kg body weight. The acetic acid induced writhing method, also called abdominal contraction response is a very sensitive one as it can detect ant-inociceptive effects of substances at a dose that may be inactive in other methods such as tail flick test (Collier et al., 1968). Abdominal constriction responses were found to partly involve local peritoneal receptors as it was postulated by Bentley et al. (1981), thereby suggesting that the extract of S. aromaticum flower bud could interfere with such peritoneal receptors to bring about the observed analgesic effect. The ethanol extract of S. aromaticum flower bud also demonstrated a significant (P<0.05) anti-inflammatory activity against formalin-induced oedema in rats at doses of 50mg/kg, 100mg/kg and 200mg/kg. The presence of flavonoids and tannins might be responsible for the anti-nociceptive and anti-inflammatory activities as flavonoids and tannins of were found to inhibit phosphodiesterases (Duke, 2002), which are involved in cell activation, whose effect depend upon on the biosynthesis of protein cytokines that mediate adhesion of circulating leucocytes to the site of injuries. Flavonoids and tannins have been proven to potently inhibit prostaglandins, a group of powerful inflammatory substances (Manthey, 2000).
The association of both anti-nociceptive and anti-inflammatory effects is well documented for various non steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDS) (Gyires et al., 1985). The extract may be suppressing oedema formation by reducing vascular permeability as in case of NSAID (Swingle et al., 1974). Thus the plant could be used to serve as a potential source of anti-inflammatory and anti-nociceptive agents, which also supports the local claim of its use in painful and inflammatory conditions.
Acknowledgements
The authors of this work wish to acknowledge the technical assistance of Bala Mohammed and Nura Mohammed of the Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria.
References
- 1.Bentley GA, Newton SH, Starr J. Evidence from an action of morphine and the enkephallins can sensory nerve endings in the mouse peritoneum. Brit J Pharmacol. 1981;79:125–134. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1981.tb10425.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Blumenthal M. The Complete German Commission E Monographs: Therapeutic Guide to Herbal Medicines. Austin: American Botanical Council; 1998. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Brain K R, Turner T.D. The Practical Evaluation of Phytopharmaceuticals. Bristol: Wright Scientechnica; 1975. pp. 57–58. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Collier HOJ, Dinneen LG, Johnson CA, Schneider The abdominal constriction response and its suppression by analgesic drugs in the mouse. Brit J Pharmacol. 1968;32:295–310. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1968.tb00973.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Duke J A. CRC Handbook of medicinal herbs. ed2. CRC Med Herbs; 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Friedman M, Henika PR, Mandrell RE. Bactericidal activities of plant essential oils and some of their isolated constituents against Campylobacter jejuni, Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, and Salmonella enterica. Journal of Food Prot. 2002;65(10):1545–1560. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-65.10.1545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gordon L A. Country Herbal. Devon, England: Webb & Bower (Publishers) Ltd.; 1980. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gyires K, Furts S, Miklya A, Budavari I, Knoll J. Drugs under Experimental and Clinical Research. 1985;2(8):493–500. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Swingle KF, Scherrer RR. Anti-inflammatory agents. Chem Pharmacol. 1974;2:1129–1135. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Koster R, Auderson N, De Beer J.M. Acetic acid used for analgesic screening. Federation Proceedings. 1959;18:412. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Manthey JA. Biological properties of flavonoids pertaining to inflammation. Journal of Microcirculation. 2000;7(6):29–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hess SM, Milong RC. In: Inflammation Mechanism and Control. Lepow, Ward PA, editors. New York: academic Press; 1972. pp. 1–2. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lorke D. A new Approach to Practical Acute Toxicity Testing, Analgesic Screening. Arch Toxicol. 1983;53:275–287. doi: 10.1007/BF01234480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Winter EA, Nuss GV. Anti- Inflammatory and antipyretic activities of indomethacin. J Pharmacol Exptll Ther. 1963;141:369–376. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Duncan R C, Knapp R G, Miller M C. Introductory Biostatistics for Health Sciences. N. Y.: John Wiley and Son, Inc.; 1977. Test of Hypotheses in population Means; pp. 71–76. [Google Scholar]