Abstract
Antibacterial activity and phytochemical tests of eight whole plant methanol extracts belonging to family Euphorbiaceae were evaluated. In agar well diffusion assay the diameter of inhibition zones ranged from 3–13 mm. Phyllanthus emblica showed maximum activity of 13 mm. The MIC and MBC observed were 30–140 mcg/ml and 40–160 mcg/ml, respectively. P. piscatorum and P. emblica showed the lowest MIC (30 mcg/ml), P. emblica the lowest MBC (40 mcg/ml) and thus an effective inhibitor of the tested bacteria. Alkaloids, saponins and tannins were detected in 7 out of 8 tested plants.
Keywords: Plant extracts, Antibacterial activity, MIC, MBC, Phytochemical tests
Introduction
Finding healing powers in plants is an ancient idea. There is an evidence that Neanderthals living 60,000 years ago in present day Iraq used plants such as hollyhock (Stock, 1988) as medicines. These plants are still widely used in ethnomedicine around the world. It is estimated that there are 250,000 to 500,000 species of plants on earth . A relatively small percentage (1 to 10%) of these are used as food. It is possible that even more are used for medicinal purposes (Moerman, 1996).
Microorganisms have developed resistance to many antibiotics and this has created immense clinical problem in the treatment of infectious diseases (Davis, 1994). The increase in resistance of microorganisms due to indiscriminate use of commercial antimicrobial drugs encouraged scientists to search for new antimicrobial substances from various sources including medicinal plants (Karaman et al., 2003). Another driving factor for the renewed interest in past 20 years has been the rapid rate of plant species extinction.
Around 12,000 plant secondary metabolites of antimicrobial importance have been isolated. These compounds fall in one of the major groups of compounds like phenols, quinones, flavonoids tannins, terpenoids, alkaloids and other mixtures (Schultes, 1978).
Infectious diseases account for high proportion of health problems in the developing countries (Sashi et al, 2003). In India, about 2500 species of plants are used for medicinal purposes and about 90% of the medicinal plants provide raw materials for the herbal pharmaceuticals, which are collected from wild habitats. The rich knowledge base of countries like India in medicinal plants and health care has led to the keen interest by pharmaceutical companies to use this knowledge as a resource for research and development programmes in the pursuit of discovering novel drugs (Rajasekharan and Ganeshan, 2002).
An antimicrobial compound arylnaphthalide lignan Justicidin B was isolated from Phyllanthus piscatorum (Gertsch et al., 2004). Antimicrobial acivities have been repored from Bridelia ferruginea (Kabir et al., 2005; Akinpelu, 2000), Mallotus phillipensis (Taylor et a.l., 1996), Phyllanthus emblica (Panthi and Chaudhary, 2006), Phyllanthus polyphyllus (Ngemenya et al, 2006) and Bridelia species (Irobi et al 1994). However, several plants are used in India in the form of crude extracts without scientific evidence of efficacy (Ahmed et al., 1998). At this juncture, it is of interest to determine the scientific basis for the traditional use of these medicinal plants. The aim of the present study is to reveal the antimicrobial properties and phytochemicals of 8 selected medicinal plants through in vitro investigation.
Materials and Methods
Plant Materials
Eight whole plant materials (Table 1) of the family Euphorbiaceae were collected locally or either procured from local traditional healers claiming their efficacies. Their botanical identities were determined and authenticated. Samples were deposited in the Botany Department Herbarium of Kakatiya University. The whole plants were oven dried at 60°C for one week, and powdered and stored in airtight containers. 10 g of each of the powdered plant materials were extracted in a soxhlet extractor containing 40 ml of 80% methanol. The resulting extracts were evaporated under reduced pressure.
Table -1.
Profile of Eight medicinal plants used
| Plant species | Activity | Voucher number |
| Breynia ramnoids | Anti-convulsant, sedative, Antibacterial | APE 11 |
| Bridelia montana | Antibacterial, skin cleanser | APE 12 |
| Bridelia ferruginea | Antibacterial, Antifungal, Anti-spasmatic | APE 13 |
| Mallotus phillipensis | Urolithotriptie, Antibacterial | APE 14 |
| Phyllanthus emblica | Antidiabetic, antioxidant, antibacterial, antifungal, anti-viral, immunomodulatary |
APE 15 |
| Phyllanthus flaccidus | Anti-edematic, anti-dysentry antimicrobial | APE 16 |
| Phyllanthus Polyphyllus | Anti-inflammatory, sedative, anti-bacterial | APE 17 |
| Phyllanthus piscatorum | Antibacterial, anti-dysentery, immunomodulatory. |
APE 18 |
Phytochemical tests
Methanolic extracts of the plants were qualitatively analyzed. Tannins, phenols and steroids were tested as described by Gibbs (1974). Alkaloids, ellagic acids, iridoids, lignans, methelene dioxy compounds, triterpenoids were tested by standard procedures (Trease and Evans, 1989).
Bacterial cultures
Four Gram positive bacteria, Bacillus stearothermophilus, Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis, Micrococcus leuteus, and four gram negative bacteria, Salmonella typhi, Enterobacter aerogens, Proteus mirabilis and Proteus vulgaris were used for bioassay. The pure strains were obtained from microbial type culture collection and gene bank (MTCC), Institute of microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India. The organisms were maintained on agar slopes at 4°C and sub cultured for 24hr before use.
Bacterial susceptibility testing
The Agar plate well-diffusion method was used as described by Desta (2005). A standardized inoculum 1–2 × 107 cfu/ml 0.5 MC Farland standards was introduced onto the surface of sterile agar plate, and evenly distributed by using a sterile glass spreader. Simultaneously, 8 mm wells were cut from the plate using a sterile cork borer. 70 µl of extract at a concentration of 50 mcg/ml was introduced into each well. The agar plates were incubated aerobically at 37°C. After 24hr, the inhibition zones were measured with a ruler and compared with the control well containing only methanol. 30 mcg/ml of ampicillin served as control.
Determination of MIC and MBC
MICs and MBCs of the extracts were determined as described by Kabir et al. (2005). MICs of the extracts were determined by diluting them to various concentrations ranging from 10 to 200 mcg/ml. Each volume of each extract and nutrient broth were mixed in a test tube and 0.1 ml of standard inoculum (1–2 × 107 cfu/ml) was added to each tube. Control tubes were maintained simultaneously. The tubes were incubated aerobically at 37°C for 24 hrs. The lowest concentration of extract that produced no visible bacterial growth (no turbidity) when compared with control tube was regarded as MIC. MBC was determined by sub-culturing the test dilution onto a fresh agar plate (without extract) and incubated for 24 hr. The highest dilution that yielded no single bacterial colony was taken as MBC.
Statistical analysis
All the tests were conducted in triplicates. The data of all the parameters were statistically analyzed and expressed as mean ± S.D.
Results and Discussion
The profile of eight medicinal plants used in this study is shown in Table 1.
Tests were conducted for the presence of phytochemicals in all of these methanolic extracts (Table 2). Alkaloids, phenols and tannins were detected in all the extracts except that of P. Emblica. P. piscatorum and P. flaccidus which were positive to 9 and 8 phytochemical tests respectively. These results are in parallel to the earlier studies conducted on terpens, alkaloids, lignans, flavonoids and tannins in Phyllathus species (Vongvanich et al, 2000; Houghton, 1999; Lin et al, 1995). The results of the phytochemical tests on B. ferruginea confirms the studies on the same by Kabir, where he reported the presence of alkaloids, tannins, saponins and flavonoids (Kabir et al., 2005). However, B. montana revealed the presence of phenols, tannins, alkaloids, ellagic acid and lignans in contrast to the report of Irobi, where he reported the presence of only phenols and tannins (Irobi et al., 1994). The difference in the findings might be due to the nature of solvent used for extraction which determines the presence or absence of a metabolite in the extract.
Table 2.
Results of phytochemical tests
| Plants | AL | EA | IR | LI | MDC | ST | TA | TT | pH |
| B.ramnoids | ++ | + | − | + | + | + | + | − | ++ |
| B.montana | ++ | − | + | − | + | + | ++ | − | ++ |
| B.ferruginea | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | + | + | + | ++ | ++ |
| M.phillipensis | ++ | − | − | ++ | − | + | + | + | ++ |
| P.Emblica | +++ | + | + | + | − | − | ++ | + | ++ |
| P.flaccidus | ++ | + | + | − | + | ++ | +++ | ++ | +++ |
| P.Polyphyllus | ++ | +++ | − | − | − | + | ++ | − | + |
| P.piscatorum | +++ | + | + | +++ | + | + | +++ | + | ++ |
AL - Alkaloids, EA - Ellagic acids, IR - Iridoids, LI - Lignans, MDC - Methelene dioxy compounds, ST - Steroids, TA - Tannins, TT - Triterpenoids, PH - Phenols, +++ = High Amount; ++ = Moderate Amount; + = Low Amount; − Absent
Eight whole plant methanol extracts were tested against 4 gram +ve and 4 gram −ve bacteria. The results of antibacterial activity of the methanol extracts and their efficacies as compared to standard ampicillin are depicted in Tables 3 and 4 respectively. In agar well diffusion assay, the diameter of inhibition zones ranged from 3–13 mm (Table 3). P. emblica showed maximum antibacterial activity against E. aerogens (13 mm), Proteus vulgaris (13 mm) and Proteus mirabilis (11 mm) with an efficiency of 109%, 86% and 67% to those of Ampicillin. Maximum zones of clearance by P. emblica were observed in gram −ve bacteria. Similar results were obtained by Mazumder, where the extract showed significant concentration dependent antibacterial activity particularly against gram −ve microbes (Mazumder et al., 2006). P. emblica showed inhibitory activity against 7 organisms including 4 gram −ve bacteria. Phytochemicals tests revealed the presence of high amounts of alkaloids and also phenols in the extract of P. emblica. Alkaloids (Kabir et al., 2005) and phenols (Houghton et al., 1999) have been reported to possess antimicrobial activity.
Table 3.
Antibacterial activity of the crude plant extracts by well diffusion method
| Plants | B.st | S.A | B.S | M.l | S.t | E.a | P.m | P.v |
| B. ramnoids | -- | -- | 5 ± 0.2 | - | - | 4 ± 0.2 | - | - |
| B. montana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| B. ferruginea | - | - | 8 ± 0.2 | 8 ± 0.1 | - | 8 ± 0.2 | 8 ± 0.1 | 10 ± 0.1 |
| M. phillipensis | - | 3 ± 0.1 | 3± 0.1 | 3± 0.2 | - | 3 ± 0.2 | 3 ± 0.2 | - |
| P. Emblica | - | 9± 0.1 | 10 ± 0.1 | 10 | 8 ± 0.1 | 13 ± 0.2 | 11± 0.1 | 13 ± 0.1 |
| P. flaccidus | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| P. Polyphyllus | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| P. piscatorum | - | 6± 0.1 | 10± 0.2 | 9 ± 0.2 | - | 9 ± 0.1 | 10 ± 0.1 | 9 ± 0.2 |
| Ampicillin | - | 16±0.1 | 14±0.1 | 12±0.1 | 10±0.1 | 12±0.2 | 16±0.1 | 15±0.1 |
Key: B.st - Bacillus stearothermophilus, S.a - Staphylococcus aureus, B.s - Bacillus subtilis, M.l- Micrococcus leuteus, S.t - Salmonella typhi, E.a - Enterobacter aerogens, P.m - Proteus mirabilis, P.v. - Proteus vulgaris, Figures indicate average zone of inhibition (in mm), (-) = No inhibition, Ampicillin = Commercial antibiotic.
Table 4.
Efficacies of crude extracts as compared to standard ampicillin
| Plant species | B.st | S.A | B.S | M.l | S.t | E.a | P.m | P.v |
| B.ramnoids | - | - | 36% | - | - | 33% | - | - |
| B.montana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| B.ferruginea | - | - | 57% | 65% | - | 65% | 50% | 66% |
| M.phillipensis | - | 19% | 22% | 25% | - | 25% | 19% | - |
| P.Emblica | - | 57% | 72% | 81% | 80% | 109% | 67% | 86% |
| P.flaccidus | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| P.Polyphyllus | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| P.piscatorum | - | 38% | 72% | 73% | - | 73% | 61% | 57% |
Key: B.st - Bacillus stearothermophilus, S.a - Staphylococcus aureus,
B.s - Bacillus subtilis, M.l- Micrococcus leuteus, S.t - Salmonella typhi,
E.a - Enterobacter aerogens, P.m - Proteus mirabilis, P.v. - Proteus vulgaris,
% - Efficacy as compared to ampicillin in inhibiting the bacteria.
None of the extracts or Ampicillin was active on B. stearothermophilus. So this bacteria is considered as most resistant towards all the extracts tested. B. montana, P. flaccidus and P. polyphyllus showed no inhibition. Irobi reported that Bridelia species produced antimicrobial activities ranging from 4–20 mm (Irobi et al., 1994). This is due to high concentration of 5 mg/ml of extracts tested as compared to 100 µg/ml of extract tested in present study. This other wise can be stated as significant concentration dependent antibacterial activity (Mazumder et al., 2006).
Lowest antibacterial activity was exhibited by M. phillipensis (3 mm) against 3 gram +ve and 2 gram −ve bacteria. This confirms the earlier report of Chattopadhyay, where the crude methanol extract was found to be active against S. aureus, B. subtilis and P. mirabilis (Chattopadhyay et al., 2002). Taylor reported that bacteria causing diarrhea and dysentery were effectively inhibited by extract of M. phillipensis (Taylor et al, 1996). P. piscatorum showed maximum activity of 10 mm against B. subtilis and P. mirabilis with an efficacy of 72% and 61% respectively as that of standard Ampicillin (Table 4). Gertsch reported that P. piscatorum had no inhibitory activity against gram +ve bacterial strains (Gertsch et al., 2004). In this study the extract showed inhibitory activity against 3 gram +ve and 3 gram −ve among the 8 tested bacterial strains. The reason for the difference in activities in both of the findings is supposed to be dependent on plant habitat (Rajakaruna et al., 2002). The antibacterial activity of P. piscatorum might be due to the presence of high amounts of lignans as revealed in phytochemical tests. Lin reported the antimicrobial activity of lignans isolated from Phyllanthus sps (Lin et al., 1995). The inhibitory activity of B. ferruginea against two gram +ve and three gram −ve bacteria was consistent with the earlier report of Akinpelu where he reported inhibitory activity on seven out of 8 organisms tested (Akinpelu, 2000). Maximum inhibitory zone of 10 mm was noticed as compared to Kabir et al., (2005) with 4.7 and 4.6 mm zones of activity by B. ferruginea.
The MICs and MBCs of the eight extracts is 30–140 mcg/ml and 40–160 mcg/ml, respectively (Table 5) P. piscatorum and P.emblica showed lowest MIC (30 mcg/ml) against B.subtilis and P.mirabilis respectively. P.emblica showed the lowest MBC (40 mcg/ml) against P.mirabilis. This result is similar with that of Onoch, where Phyllanthus species were active against P.mirabilis (Onoch et al, 2003). According to Panthi, P. emblica was more effective in fresh rather than in dry condition (Panthi and Chaudhary, 2006). So >30 mcg/ml (MIC) and >40 mcg/ml (MBC) can be expected of the same. This is interesting and such low concentrations could be used in combination with other plant extracts. P. emblica is one of the best constituents of a well known drug ‘Triphala’ i.e combination of P. emblica, T. chebula and T. bellirica in equal proportion is used to manage stomach disorder. P. polyphyllus with MIC of 140 mcg/ml and P.flaccidus with MBC of 160 mcg/ml showed highest concentrations on B. stearothermophilus, which when compared to MIC of 2 mg/ml and MBC of 6 mg/ml (Ngemenya et al., 2006) is very low in concentration. The antimicrobial activity of these plant species can be attributed by the presence of alkaloids phenols and tannins (Table 2). It has been reported that Alkaloids, phenols and tannins are plant metabolites well known for antimicrobial activity (Tschesche, 1970).
Table 5.
Minimum inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations of methanol extracts (mcg/ml)
| Plants | B.st | S.a | B.s | M.l | S.t | E.a | P.m | P.v | ||||||||
| MIC | MBC | MIC | MBC | MIC | MBC | MIC | MBC | MIC | MBC | MIC | MBC | MIC | MBC | MIC | MBC | |
| B.ramnoids | 135 | 150 | 90 | 105 | 85 | 105 | 75 | 90 | 115 | 130 | 90 | 115 | 130 | 160 | 85 | 130 |
| B.montana | 110 | 130 | 135 | 60 | 70 | 95 | 95 | 115 | 90 | 110 | 110 | 125 | 80 | 105 | 70 | 105 |
| B.ferruginea | 70 | 85 | 95 | 125 | 60 | 85 | 65 | 90 | 85 | 110 | 50 | 75 | 40 | 65 | 75 | 85 |
| M.phillipensis | 95 | 105 | 85 | 100 | 85 | 110 | 70 | 105 | 95 | 120 | 110 | 135 | 90 | 120 | 80 | 95 |
| P.Emblica | 95 | 105 | 50 | 65 | 40 | 60 | 50 | 80 | 35 | 45 | 45 | 50 | 30 | 40 | 60 | 80 |
| P.flaccidus | 130 | 160 | 110 | 135 | 90 | 115 | 95 | 135 | 85 | 95 | 85 | 110 | 110 | 125 | 95 | 105 |
| P.Polyphyllus | 140 | 155 | 85 | 115 | 95 | 130 | 85 | 105 | 125 | 155 | 80 | 105 | 95 | 120 | 80 | 105 |
| P.piscatorum | 90 | 120 | 75 | 105 | 30 | 55 | 50 | 65 | 80 | 110 | 45 | 65 | 40 | 50 | 70 | 85 |
Key: B.st - Bacillus stearothermophilus, S.a - Staphylococcus aureus, B.s - Bacillus subtilis, M.l- Micrococcus leuteus, S.t - Salmonella typhi, E.a - Enterobacter aerogens, P.m - Proteus mirabilis, P.v. - Proteus vulgaris, MIC - Minimum inhibitory concentration, MBC - Minimum bactericidal concentration,;mcg/ml - Microgram per milliliter
P. piscatorum, B. ferruginea and P. emblica showed MIC of <100 mcg/ml on all the bacteria tested, so these 3 extracts can be considered to have broad spectrum antibiotic values. This is in parallel with the findings of Kabir et al (2005) at MIC of > 100 mcg/ml for B.ferruginea. The antimicrobial activity of P. piscatorum might be due to arylnaphthalide lignan Justicidin B (Gertsch, 2004). B.subtilis, M.leuteus and P.vulgaris were inhibited at <100 mcg/ml (MIC) by all the extracts tested. These 3 bacteria can be treated as sensitive towards all the extracts used. From Table 5 it is clear that extracts were bacteriostatic at lower concentrations and bactericidal at higher concentrations.
Conclusion
It is evident from the present study that some of the extracts inhibited the tested microorganisms. The extracts were bacteriostatic at lower concentrations and bactericidal at higher concentrations.
Acknowledgements
Authors are thankful to S.Girisham, Head, Department of Microbiology for providing the necessary facilities and Mr.Chaeraalu for technical assistance.
References
- 1.Ahmed I, Mehmood Z, Mohammad F. Screening of some Indian medicinal plants for their antimicrobial properties. J Ethnopharmacol. 1998;62:183–193. doi: 10.1016/s0378-8741(98)00055-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Akinpelu DA, Olorunmola FO. Antimicrobial activity of Bridelia ferruginea fruit. Fitoterapia. 2000;71:75–76. doi: 10.1016/s0367-326x(99)00113-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chattopadhyay D, Arunachalam G, Mandal AB, Sur TK, Mandal SC, Bhattacharya SK. Antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activity of folkfore: Mallotus Peltatus leaf extract. J Ethnopharmacol. 2002;82:229–237. doi: 10.1016/s0378-8741(02)00165-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Davis J. Inactivation of antibiotics and the dissemination of resistance genes. Science. 1994;264:375–382. doi: 10.1126/science.8153624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Desta B. Ethiopian traditional herbal drugs part 11.Antimicrobial activity of 63 medicinal plants. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005;100:168–175. doi: 10.1016/0378-8741(93)90028-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gibbs RD. chemotaxonomy of flowering plants. I. Nontreal and London: McGill-Queen's university press; 1974. pp. 523–619. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gertsch J, Niomawe, Gertsch-Roost K, Sticher O. Phyllanthus Piscatorum, Ethnopharmacological studies on a women's medicinal plant of the Yanomami Amerindians. J Ethnopharmacol. 2004;91:181–188. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2003.12.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Houghton PJ, Woldemariam TZ, O'Shea S, Mullen JE, Rostron T, Bantvala JE, Walker E, Thyagarajan SP, Soloman S, Yeap Foo L. The anti-HIV activity of an aqueous extract and polyphenolic compounds of Phyllanthus amarus. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1999;51:100. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Irobi ON, Moon-Yong M, Anderson WA, Daramola SA. Antimicrobial activity of bark extracts of Bridelia ferruginea (Euphorbiaceae) J Ethnopharmacol. 1994;43:185–190. doi: 10.1016/0378-8741(94)90041-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kabir O A, Olukayode O, chidi E O, Christopher C, fasure KA. Screening of crude extracts of six medicinal plants used in south-West Nigerian unorthodox medicine for anti-methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus activity. Comp Alt Med. 2005;5:6. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-5-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Karaman I, Sahin P, Gulluce M, Oguten H, Songul M, Adiguzed A. Antimicrobial activity of aqueous and methanol extracts of Juniperus oxycedrus L. J Ethanopharmacol. 2003;2837:1–5. doi: 10.1016/s0378-8741(03)00006-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lin MJ, Lec SS, Liu KCSC. Phyllamyricins A-C, 3 Novel Lignans from Phyllanthus myrtifolius. J Nat Prod. 1995;58:244–249. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mazumder A, Mahato A, Mazumder R. Antimicrobial potentiality of Phyllanthus amarus against drug resistant pathogens. Nat Prod Res. 2006;20:323–326. doi: 10.1080/14786410600650404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Moerman DE. An analysis of the food plants and drug plants of Native North America. J Ethnopharmacol. 1996;52:1–22. doi: 10.1016/0378-8741(96)01393-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ngemenya, Moses N, James A, Mbah, Pierre Jane, Vincent PK, Titanji Antibacterial effects of some Cameroonian medicinal plants against common pathogenic bacteria. Afr J Tra Comp and Alt Med. 2006;2:84–93. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Onoch PA, Opegbemi AO, Kadri OA, Ajayi KM, Okorie DA. Antimicrobial properties of Nigerian Euphorbiaceae. Nigerian J Natural Products Med. 2003;7:9–12. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Panthi MP, Chaudhary RP. Antibacterial activity of some selected folklore medicinal plants from west Nepal. Scientific World. 2006;4:205–210. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Rajasekharan PE, Ganeshan S. Conservation of medicinal plant biodiversity in Indian perspective. J Med Aromatic Pl Sci. 2002;24:132–147. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rajakaruna N, Harris C, Towers GHN. Antimicrobial activity of plants collected from serpentine outcrops in Srilanka. Pharm biol. 2002;40:235–244. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sashi Kumar J, Remya M, Janardhan K. Antimicrobial activity of ethnomedicinal plants of Nilgiri Biosphere reserve and Western ghats. Asian J Microbial Biotech Env Sci. 2003;5:183–185. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Schultes RE. The Kingdom of plants. In: Thomson WAR, editor. Medicines from the earth. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.; 1978. p. 208. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Stock Well C. Natures pharmacy. London, United Kingdom: Century Hutchinson Ltd.; 1988. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Taylor RSL, Edel F, Manandhar NP, Towers GHN. Antiviral activities of Nepalese medicinal plants. J Ethnopharmacol. 1996;52:157–163. doi: 10.1016/0378-8741(96)01409-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Trease GE, Evans WC. A text-book of pharmacognosy. London: Bailliere Tinall Ltd.; 1989. p. 53. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tschesche R. Advances in the chemistry of antibiotic substances from higher plants pharmacognosy and phytochemistry. In: Wagner H, Horharmmer L, editors. Proceedings of the 1st international congress, Murich. Vol. 171. Berlin Heidelberg, New York: Springer-verlag; 1970. pp. 274–289. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Vongvanich N, Kittakoop P, Kramyu j, Tanticharoen M, Thebtaranonth Y. Phyllanthusols A and B, Cotytoxic norbisabolane glcosides from Phyllanthus acidus skeels. J Org Chem. 2000;65:5420–5423. doi: 10.1021/jo000439+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
