Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2009 Oct 8;20(3):1302. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2009.10.018

Syntheses and antibacterial activity studies of new oxazolidinones from nitroso Diels–Alder chemistry

Shanshan Yan a, Marvin J Miller a,, Timothy A Wencewicz a, Ute Möllmann b
PMCID: PMC2818252  NIHMSID: NIHMS151377  PMID: 20031407

Abstract

A series of novel oxazolidinone antibiotics having [2.2.1] and [2.2.2] bicyclic oxazine moieties at the C-5 side chain of the A ring was synthesized by nitroso Diels–Alder reactions, from three linezolid analogs containing morpholine, piperazine and thiomorpholine, respectively, as the C-ring components. Subsequent N–O bond cleavage generated oxazolidinones with 4-amino cyclo-2- en-1-ol substituents. The in vitro antibacterial activities of these oxazolidinone analogs were evaluated.


Oxazolidinones are a new class of synthetic antimicrobial agents which are now clinically useful. They inhibit bacterial protein synthesis by binding to the 50S ribosomal subunit at the translation step.1 The most promising feature of these compounds is their oral activity against multidrug-resistant Gram-positive bacteria, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) as well as select anaerobic organisms.2 Linezolid (Figure 1) is the first oxazolidinone drug approved for the treatment of Gram-positive bacterial infections in humans.2b,3 Unfortunately, resistance to linezolid has already been observed in Gram-positive bacteria such as S. aureus and Enterococcus faecium.4 More recently, resistant strains of MRSA, E. coli and other bacteria have also been identified.5 Thus, there is significant need for the rapid development of novel antibacterial agents. Four Types of chemical modifications of linezolid and oxazolidinone-type antibiotics have been reported, including modifications on each of the A-, B- and C-rings as well as the C-5 side chain of the A ring substructure.2b,6 The structure-activity- relationship studies of oxazolidinone antibiotics show that the stereochemistry (S) at the C-5 position of the A ring is critical in terms of biological activity. While an acetamide substituent on the 5-methyl group is found to produce optimal antibacterial activity, modification of the C-5 side chain would still benefit the development of new oxazolidinone antibiotics. In this regard, a frequently employed strategy involves the addition of heterocycles, such as triazoles,7 and pyridones.8 However, to the best of our knowledge, the incorporation of bicyclic oxazines into this class of antibiotics has not been disclosed.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Linezolid antibiotic (1).

Syntheses of interesting biologically relevant molecules using nitroso Diels–Alder chemistry (NDA) is of growing interest. As a synthetic tool for the formation of 4-amino cyclopent-2-en-1-ol derivatives in one step, acylnitroso Diels–Alder reactions are useful for the creation of unique structural and functional diversity.9 We and others have demonstrated that the nitroso bicyclic oxazine 3 derived from NDA reaction between in situ generated acylnitroso 2 and 1,3-cyclopentadiene can undergo various chemical transformations (Scheme 1).9b We envisioned that modification at the A-ring C-5 side chain of linezolid-type oxazolidinone antibiotics using nitroso Diels–Alder chemistry would generate novel analogs with incorporation of bicyclic oxazine functionalities. These new analogs were anticipated to not only enhance the available set of oxazolidinone antibiotics, but also provide new scaffolds for further transformations. Herein we report the syntheses and biological evaluation of a series of oxazolidinone antibiotics in which the C-5 side chain has been modified by nitroso Diels–Alder reactions and subsequent chemical transformations.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Acylnitroso Diels–Alder (NDA) reaction

To begin our investigation, three types of oxazolidinone precursors 1416 were synthesized from commercial piperazine (4), morpholine (6) and thiomorpholine (7), respectively, as shown in Scheme 2. The syntheses began by separate SNAr reactions of 3,4-difluoronitrobenzene with mono Boc-protected piperazine, 5, morpholine, 6, and thiomorpholine, 7, under basic conditions to afford para-substituted nitrobenzene derivatives 810 in moderate to good yields. Palladium catalyzed hydrogenolyses of 8 and 9, followed by reactions with CbzCl gave protected anilines 1112. The synthesis of thiomorpholine analog 13 required modification to avoid poisoning of the catalyst by the sulfur atom during the hydrogenation step. Thus, use of indium powder and ammonium chloride10 successfully reduced the nitro group of 10 and gave compound 13 in 62% yield after Cbz protection. Then, as reported,11 compounds 1113 were treated with nBuLi and R-glycidyl butyrate sequentially at −78 °C to form oxazolidinone analogs 1416 in 70–80% yields with defined stereochemistry at the A-ring C-5 position.

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Reagents and conditions: (a) Boc2O, DCM, 50%; (b) 3,4-difluoronitrobenzene, Hunig’s base, CH3CN, 49% (for 8), 84% (for 9), 70% (for 10); (c) (i) Pd/C, H2, MeOH, (ii) CbzCl, NaHCO3, THF/H2O, 89% (for 11), 92% (for 12); (d) (i) In, NH4Cl, EtOH, reflux, (ii) CbzCl, NaHCO3, THF/H2O, 62% (for 13); (e) (i) nBuLi, THF, −78 °C, (ii) R-glycidyl butyrate, 71% (for 14), 70% (for 15), 80% (for 16).

With the desired aza-, oxa-, and thia-analogs, 1416, in hand, introduction of the N-hydroxy carbamate moiety at the C-5 side chain and subsequent nitroso Diels–Alder reactions were explored (Scheme 3). Reactions of14 and 15 with O-benzylhydroxylamine hydrochloride (OBHA·HCl) and carbonyldiimidazole (CDI) generated protected N-hydroxy carbamates 17 and 18 in 96% and 94% yields, respectively. Hydrogenolyses afforded the desired free N-hydroxy carbamates, 20 and 21, which were directly used in nitroso Diels–Alder reactions without further purification. Toward this end, N-hydroxy carbamate 20 was chosen as the model substrate. The cycloaddition reaction was carried out by in situ oxidation of 20 in the presence of 1,3-cyclohexadiene. Among several oxidants attempted, including sodium periodate (NaIO4), Dess-Martin and FeCl3/H2O2,12 we found that use of sodium periodate gave cycloadduct 23b in the best yield (56%) as one regioisomer after chromatography purification. For the thiomorpholine series, in order to again avoid catalyst poisoning during the subsequent deprotection step, O-p-methoxybenzyl hydroxylamine hydrochloride (PMBONH2·HCl)13 instead of OBHA·HCl was used in the coupling reaction with 16. The PMB group was removed under acidic conditions to give N-hydroxy carbamate 22 in good yield. Using the optimized NDA reaction conditions, a series of new oxazolidinones 23a25b with bicyclic oxazines at the C-5 side chain were synthesized. Among them, cycloadducts 25a and 25b were obtained with the sulfur atom in the thiomorpholinyl ring oxidized. N–O bond cleavage reactions of these cycloadducts were also carried out, with intent to generate the corresponding oxazolidinones with additional 1,4-amino alcohol substituents. Thus, Mo(CO)614 successfully reduced the N–O bond of compounds 23a25b to generate the corresponding oxazolidinone analogs, 26a28b, that contain aminocycloalkenol functional groups, in moderate yields. In addition, under Mo(CO)6 conditions, the sulfoxide group of 25a and 25b was also reduced. For comparison during the biological testing, an oxazolidinone analog 29 with a C-5 acetate substituent was synthesized from compound 15 (Scheme 4).

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Reagents and conditions: (a) (i) CDI, CH3CN (ii) OBHA·HCl, imidazole, 96% (for 17), 94% (for 18); (b) CDI, CH3CN, (ii) PMBONH2·HCl, imidazole, 92% (for 19); (c) Pd/C, H2, MeOH; (d) (i) 10% TFA, DCM, (ii) sat. Na2CO3; (e) NaIO4, 1,3-cyclopentadiene, MeOH/H2O, 0°C, 50% (for 23a, from 17), 49% (for 24a, from 18), 40% (for 25a, from 19); (e) NaIO4, 1,3-cyclopentadiene, MeOH/H2O, 0°C, 50% (for 23a, from 17), 49% (for 24a, from 18), 40% (25a, from 19); (f) NaIO4, 1,3-cyclohexadiene, MeOH/H2O, 0°C, 56% (for 23b, from 17), 47% (for 24b, from 18), 42% (25b, from 19); (g) Mo(CO)6, CH3CN/H2O, 80°C, 50% (for 26a), 43% (for 26b), 42% (for 27a), 62% (for 27b), 54% (for 28a), 55% (for 28b).

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4

Reagents and conditions: (a) Ac2O, Pyridine, DMAP, DCM, 75%.

With the biological profile of parent linezolid, 1, known for comparison, all the oxazolidinone analogs 23a28b, 29, as well as precursors 1416, and ciprofloxacin, as a positive control, were subjected to broad antibacterial studies against various strains of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria as well as Mycobacterium vaccae, using agar diffusion assays (Table 1).15 Compound 29 was found to be comparable to linezolid (1) itself for all tested organisms, as expected. Interestingly, all the oxazolidinone precursors 1416 were roughly equipotent in vitro with linezolid (1) against several Gram-positive organisms, including Bacillus subtilis, S. aureus, E. faecalis and M. luteus. They also exhibited antimycobacterial activity and could potentially be useful for treatment of M. tuberculosis as they induced large inhibition zones against Mycobacterium vaccae, a common model for M. tuberculosis. Most oxazolidinone analogs with bicyclic oxazine or aminocycloalkenol moieties at the C-5 side chain, generated from NDA chemistry, had antimicrobial profiles similar to linezolid (1), but at a generally diminished level of activity. In general, oxazolidinone analogs substituted with [2.2.1] bicyclic oxazines (23a25a) were more active than those with [2.2.2] bicyclic oxazines (23b25b). Among them, compound 25a derived from thiomorpholine exhibited the best activity. Analogs 26a28b, derived from reduction of the N–O bonds were relatively inactive compared to their parent cycloadducts.

Table 1.

Antimicrobial activity in the agar diffusion assay (Diameter of inhibition zone, measured in mm).

Gram-positive bacteria Gram-negative bacteria

Compds Bacillus
subtilis
Micrococcus luteus Staphylococcus aureus Enterococcus faecalis Escherichia coli Pseudomonas aeruginosa Mycobacterium vaccae
ATCC 6633 ATCC 10240 SG 511a 134/93
(MRSA)
ATCC
49532
1528
(VRE)
ATCC 25922 K799/WTa K799/61b IMET 10670
1 31/35P 38 27/36P NT 25 NT 0 0 10P 42
29 26.5 38/46p 26/35P NT 24 NT 0 0 17h 43
14 23/26P 34.5 24/33P NT 21 NT 0 0 10P NT
15 26/29P 38 23/32P NT 21 NT 0 0 11P 43
16 26/29P 41 24/35P NT 21.5 NT 0 0 11P 43
23a 12/18P 16 13/19p 19 19 16 0 14/20p 0 19p
23b 18P NT 16P 14p NT 12P NT NT 0 13
24a 17/30P NT 15/21p 25 NT 19 NT NT 0 30
24b 19P NT 16P 18p NT 16 NT NT 0 15
25a 21/28P 22/32P 18/22p NT 19 NT 0 0 11P 35
25b 17P 15p 15p NT 17 NT 0 0 10P 18
26a 13h 12P 14p NT 12.5 NT 0 0 10P 12h
26b 0 0 0 NT 12p NT 0 0 12P 0
27a 14P NT 15P 14p NT 12P NT NT 0 18
27b 13P NT 14P 14P NT 12P NT NT 0 0
28a 14P 15h 12.5p NT 12.5 NT 0 0 10P 18
28b 12h 14 0 NT 12 NT 0 0 10P 0
cipro 29.5 0 24 0 13 15 31/40P 35 39 19p
a

wild type.

b

permeability mutant.

p, partially clear inhibition zone/colonies in the inhibition zone.

P, unclear inhibition zone/many colonies in the inhibition zone.

h, faint indication of inhibition zone.

Exactly 50 µl of a 2.0 mM solution of each compound dissolved in 1:9 DMSO:MeOH was filled in 9 mm wells in agar media (Standard I Nutrient Agar, Serva or Mueller Hinton II Agar, Becton, Dickinson and Company). Inhibition zones read after incubation at 37 °C for 24 h. Cipro (ciprofloxacin) was dissolved in H2O to give 5 µg/mL solution.

In summary, we have synthesized a series of novel oxazolidinone antibiotics with [2.2.1] and [2.2.2] bicyclic oxazine as well as aminocycloalkenol moieties at the C-5 side chain through nitroso Diels–Alder chemistry. These oxazolidinone analogs exhibited in vitro antibacterial profiles similar to that of linezolid.

Supplementary Material

01

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the NIH (GM 075885) for support of this research. We thank Uta Wohlfeld (HKI) for performing antibacterial assays. We also thank the Lizzadro Magnetic Resonance Research Center at Notre Dame for NMR facility and Nonka Sevova for mass spectroscopic analyses. TAW acknowledges the University of Notre Dame Chemistry-Biochemistry-Biology Interface (CBBI) Program and NIH Training Grant T32GM075762 for a fellowship.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References and notes

  • 1.(a) Shinabarger DL, Marotti KR, Murray RW, Lin AH, Melchoir EP, Swaney SM, Dunyak DS, Demyan WF, Buysse JM. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1997;41:2132. doi: 10.1128/aac.41.10.2132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Kloss P, Xiong L, Mankin AS, Shinabarger DL, Mankin AS. J. Mol. Biol. 1999;294:93. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.(a) Hutchinson DK. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2003;3:1021. doi: 10.2174/1568026033452195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Barbachyn MR, Ford CW. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003;42:2010. doi: 10.1002/anie.200200528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Wookey A, Turner PJ, Greenhalgh JM, Eastwood M, Clarke J, Sefton C. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2004;10:247. doi: 10.1111/j.1198-743x.2004.00770.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Phillips OA, Rotimi VO, Jamal WJ, Shahin M, Verghese TL. J. Chemother. 2003;15:113. doi: 10.1179/joc.2003.15.2.113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Moellering RC., Jr Ann. Intern. Med. 2003;138:135. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-2-200301210-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Brickner SJ, Hutchinson DK, Barbachyn MR, Manninen PR, Ulanowicz DA, Garmon SA, Grega KC, Hendges SK, Toops DS, Ford CW, Zurenko GE. J. Med. Chem. 1996;39:673. doi: 10.1021/jm9509556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gonzales RD, Schreckenberger PC, Graham MB, Kelkar S, DenBesten K, Quinn JP. Lancet. 2001;357:1179. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04376-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.(a) Tsiodras S, Gold HS, Sakoulas G, Eliopoulos GM, Wennersten C, Venkataraman L, Moellering RC, Ferraro MJ. Lancet. 2001;358:207. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05410-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Xiong L, Kloss P, Douthwaite S, Anderson NM, Swaney S, Shinabarger DC, Mankin AS. J. Bacterial. 2000;182:5325. doi: 10.1128/jb.182.19.5325-5331.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Mutnick AH, Enne V, Jones RN. Ann. Phermacother. 2003;37:769. doi: 10.1345/aph.1C437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.(a) Brickner S. Curr. Pharm. Des. 1996;2:175. [Google Scholar]; (b) Ford CW, Barbachyn MR. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003;42:2010. doi: 10.1002/anie.200200528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Hutchinson DK. Expert. Opin. Ther. Patents. 2004;14:1309. [Google Scholar]; (d) Renslo AR, Luehr GW, Gordeev MF. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006;14:4227. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2006.01.068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Prasad JV. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2007;10:454. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2007.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.(a) Phillips OA, Udo EE, Ali AAM, Samuel SM. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2005;13:4113. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2005.03.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Phillips OA, Udo EE, Ali AAM, Samuel SM. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2007;42:214. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2006.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Paget SD, Boggs CM, Foleno BD, Goldschmidt RM, Hlasta DJ, Weidner-Wells MA, Werblood HM, Bush K, Macielag MJ. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006;16:4537. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2006.06.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.For reviews, see: Streith J, Defoin A. Synthesis. 1994;11:1107. Vogt PF, Miller MJ. Tetrahedron. 1998;54:1317. Yamamoto H, Momiyama N. Chem. Commun. 2005:3514. doi: 10.1039/b503212c. Yamamoto Y, Yamamoto H. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006:2031. Samarakoon T, Hanson RR. Chemtracts. 2007;20:220.
  • 10.Banik BK, Banik I, Becker FF. Org. Synth. 2005;81:188. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tucker JA, Allwine DA, Grega KC, Barbachyn MR, Klock JL, Adamski JL, Brickner SJ, Hutchinson DK, Ford CW, Zurenko GE, Conradi RA, Burton PS, Jensen RM. J. Med. Chem. 1998;41:3727. doi: 10.1021/jm980274l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Adamo MFA, Bruschi S. J. Org. Chem. 2007;72:2666. doi: 10.1021/jo062334y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.For synthesis of PMBONH2·HCl, see: Zhu G, Yang FL, Balachandran R, Hook P, Vallee RB, Curran DP, Day BW. J. Med. Chem. 2006;49:2063. doi: 10.1021/jm051030l.
  • 14.Cicchi S, Goti A, Brandi A, Guarna A, De Sarlos FD. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990;31:3351. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.The in vitro biological testing of N-hydroxy carbamates 20–22 (>90% pure based on LC/MS) showed these compounds also retained antimicrobial profiles similar to linezolid (1), but at a generally diminished level of activity. For detailed data, see Table 1 in Supplementary Content.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

01

RESOURCES