Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Feb 12.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Sep 22;56(11):2033–2038. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01956.x

DEPRESSION AND DISABILITY: COMPARISONS WITH COMMON PHYSICAL CONDITIONS IN THE IBADAN STUDY OF AGEING

OYE GUREJE 1,*, ADEDOTUN ADEMOLA 2, BENJAMIN O OLLEY 3
PMCID: PMC2820712  EMSID: UKMS28726  PMID: 18811605

Abstract

Objective:

Even though depression and chronic physical conditions are common causes of disability in the elderly, their relative impact is unknown among elderly Africans.

Method:

Face-to-face interviews were conducted with a representative sample of community-dwelling persons aged 65 years and over (n = 2152) in the Yoruba-speaking areas of Nigeria (representing about 22% of the national population). Major depressive disorder (MDD) was assessed using the World Health Organization's Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Chronic pain and medical disorders were assessed by self-report. Disorder-specific disability was evaluated using the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS).

Results:

MDD was highly comorbid with each of the medical conditions (Odds ratios range: 1.3 – 2.0). A higher proportion of persons with MDD (47.2%) were rated severely disabled globally than those with arthritis (20.6%), chronic spinal pain (24.2%) or with high blood pressure (25.0%). Subjects with MDD were also more likely to be severely disabled in three of the four domains of the SDS. In pair-wise comparisons, persons with MDD had significantly higher levels of disability than those with any of the disorders with the difference in the mean scores ranging between −3.74 and −27.50.

Conclusion:

In order to reduce the public health burden of depression, its prevention and treatment require more clinical and research attention than currently given by developing countries.

Keywords: Depression, physical disorders, disability, elderly, Nigerians

INTRODUCTION

Depression is a common and debilitating illness globally(1, 2). Accounting for 4.4% of the total disability adjusted life years (DALYs) in 2000, it is projected to become the second most burdensome disorder by the year 2020(3). Several studies have shown that depression is often comorbid with chronic physical conditions. Persons with diabetes, asthma, and chronic pain conditions, for example, have elevated risks for comorbid depression(4, 5). These studies, mainly conducted in developed countries of Western Europe and North America, have also shown that the presence of depression in persons with chronic physical conditions is associated with higher disability and greater impairment in quality of life(6). A recent survey of the general population in several countries, developed and developing, found that chronic physical conditions is highly comorbid with depression(7). The study also showed that, when conditions were considered in their pure non-comorbid state, depression was associated with a higher level of disability than chronic physical conditions such as diabetes, arthritis, asthma, and angina. Conducted among general adult populations(7) the study thus highlights the disabling nature of depression relative to common chronic conditions in the community.

Depression is also common among the elderly(8, 9). In a previous study, we showed that elderly Nigerians had a rate of major depressive disorder that was much higher than that in the general adult population(10). Among the elderly, depression was associated with impaired quality of life and elevated risks of disability in diverse areas of functioning(10, 11). However, since ageing is also associated with an increase in the prevalence of chronic physical conditions and with an increase in the risk of functional disability(12), it was unclear whether the level of disability we reported in that report was substantially or even predominantly accounted for by comorbid chronic physical condition. Contextual factors play an important role in determining the level of disability associated with a health condition(13). Other than access to treatment, patient and carers attitude may affect the relative level of disability associated with different health conditions in the elderly. Consequently, even though previous studies, largely conducted in developed countries of North America and Western Europe have shown that depression may carry a higher risk of disability than many chronic physical conditions in the general population(14), the same pattern may not apply to elderly persons living in a sub-Saharan African setting where the pattern of access to care, both formal and informal, to different health conditions may be different.

With a growing proportion of elderly persons in their populations, developing countries will face increasing dilemma about allocation of resources for health service to the elderly. Given the traditional neglect of mental health issues in these countries(15, 16), it is likely that the focus for the alleviation of functional disability in the elderly will be on chronic physical conditions except compelling evidence is available to suggest a different approach. In this report, using data from a community-based study of elderly persons, we present results of an evaluation of the disability associated with major depressive disorder (MDD) and a number of chronic medical conditions in elderly Nigerians.

METHOD

The method of the Ibadan Study of Aging (ISA) has been described in full elsewhere(10, 12) and only a brief summary is provided here. The ISA is a community survey of the mental and physical health status as well as the functioning and disability of elderly persons (aged 65 years and over) residing in the Yoruba-speaking areas of Nigeria, consisting of eight contiguous states in the south-western and north-central regions (Lagos, Ogun, Osun, Oyo, Ondo, Ekiti, Kogi and Kwara). These states account for about 22% of the Nigerian population (approximately, 25 million people). The survey was conducted between November 2003 and August 2004. Respondents were selected using a multi-stage stratified area probability sampling of households. In households with more than one eligible person (aged 65 years and fluent in the language of the study, Yoruba), the Kish table selection method was used to select one respondent. Face-to face interviews were carried out on 2152 respondents who provided consent to participate, representing a response rate of 74.2%.

The survey was approved by the University of Ibadan/University College Hospital, Ibadan Joint Ethical Review Board.

Measures

Diagnostic Assessment

Depression was assessed using the World Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) version three, a fully structured diagnostic interview(17). Diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD) was based on the criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV)(​18). DSM-IV organic exclusion rules were imposed in making the diagnosis of depression. Judgments about which organic conditions could explain a co-occurring MDD was made during clinical reviews (by a psychiatrist) of all questionnaires in which endorsements of depression features were made.

A checklist of chronic physical and pain conditions was included in the ISA(19). Respondents were asked if they had any chronic respiratory conditions (asthma, tuberculosis, other lung disease), digestive conditions (irritable bowel syndrome, ulcer), cardiovascular conditions (high blood pressure, heart disease, heart attack, stroke), cancer, diabetes, or epilepsy Respondents were asked whether they had experienced each of the symptom-based conditions in the previous 12 months. The checklist also ascertained the presence of any chronic pain. These included back or neck pain, arthritis, frequent headaches, and a general category of chronic pain in any other body parts.

Role impairment was assessed using the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS)(​20). For persons with 12-month MDD, this was done after the assessment for depression. For persons with a chronic physical condition, this was done after the assessment for the condition. Persons with multiple chronic physical conditions were asked to identify the most disabling of the conditions in the prior 12 months. The SDS rating was made for the condition so chosen by the respondent. The SDS was used to assess the extent to which work, household activities, relationships, and social roles were affected by the health condition in the worst month in the past year. A visual analogue scale was used to score responses: none (0), mild (1-3), moderate (4-6), severe (7-9) and very severe (10).

Data analysis

In order to take account of the stratified multistage sampling procedure and the associated clustering, weights have been derived and applied to the rates presented in this report. Also, post-stratification to the target sex and age range were made to adjust for differences between the sample and the total Nigerian population (according to 2000 United Nations projections(21)).

Two sets of analysis of the SDS were made. Domain-specific and global means were calculated for each condition. Also, the proportions of respondents rated severe or very severe in each domain and globally were calculated for each condition. Pairwise comparisons were made between these values for depression and the chronic physical conditions. In order to take account of the sample design, we used the jacknife replication method implemented with the STATA statistical package to estimate standard errors for the means and proportions(22). Statistical significance was set at 0.05 in two-sided tests.

RESULTS

12-month prevalence

Arthritis was the most common disorder, reported by almost 70% of the sample. This was followed by another pain condition: chronic back or neck pain. Major depressive disorder was present in 7% of the sample. Females were significantly more likely to report arthritis while males had significantly higher prevalence of diabetes.

Depression was highly comorbid with each of the medical conditions (Table 2). Other than diabetes in which the risk of comorbid MDD was no greater than chance, the odds of having MDD ranged between 1.6 and 2.0 for persons with the other chronic conditions.

Table 2.

Comorbidity of depression and chronic physical conditions

Condition Prevalence of Depression
Odds of having
depression
N n % C.I.
OR C.I.

Arthritis + 1488 117 7.9 6.6-9.4 1.9 1.1-2.3
Arthritis − 664 34 5.1 3.7-7.1 1 -

Back/Neck pain + 1088 92 8.5 6.9-10.3 1.6 1.1-2.2
Back/Neck pain − 1064 59 5.6 4.3-7.1 1 -

HBP + 216 26 12.0 8.3-17.1 2.0 1.3-3.2
HBP − 1881 119 6.3 5.3-7.5 1 -

Asthma + 159 18 11.3 7.3-17.3 1.8 1.1-3.0
Asthma − 1993 133 6.7 5.7-7.9 1 -

Diabetes + 47 4 8.5 3.2-20.6 1.3 0.4-3.6
Diabetes − 2050 141 6.9 5.9-8.1 1 -

Table 3 shows the proportions of subjects in each disorder group with a rating of severe or very severe (at least 7) on any of the four domains of the Sheehan Disability Scale. Subjects with MDD were more likely than those with any of the other disorders to rate themselves as severely disabled in at least one domain. While 47.2% of subject with MDD were so rated, the proportions for arthritis, spinal pain and high blood pressure were 20.6%, 24.2%, and 25.0%, respectively (chi square 4.21; df 3; p < 0.05). Significantly more males than females had severe disability rating in at least one domain compared to males (58.0% vs. 39.7%). There were no gender differences in the other disorder groups.

Table 3.

Proportions of subjects in each disorder group with a global rating of severe disability

Condition Male Female Total
n % s.e N % s.e n % s.e x2 p-value
Depression 29 58.0 7.0 29 39.7 5.8 58 47.2 4.5 3.98 0.05
Arthritis 42 18.5 2.6 54 22.6 2.7 96 20.6 1.9 1.20 0.78
Back/Neck
Pain
15 23.1 5.2 22 25.0 4.6 37 24.2 3.5 0.08 0.39
HBP 5 31.2 11.8 2 16.7 11.0 7 25.0 8.3 0.78 0.39
Asthma 0 0.00 0.0 3 17.6 9.5 3 13.6 7.5 1.02 0.32
Diabetics 0 0.00 0.0 1 14.3 13.9 1 10.0 10.0 0.47 0.52

Table 4 compares proportions of subjects with MDD who rated themselves severely disabled (a rating of at least 7) in each of the specific domains of the SDS with those with pain or medical conditions. For this analysis, arthritis and chronic spinal pain were combined to form a pain group while high blood pressure, asthma and diabetes were combined to form a chronic medical conditions group. The results show that in each of the SDS domains, other than relation, more depressed subjects were likely to rate themselves as severely disabled than either those with chronic pain or chronic medical conditions. The differences were particularly more pronounced in the domains of home activities and work.

Table 4.

Proportions of subjects in each disorder group with domain-specific rating of severe disability

Condition Pain Physical Depression Pain/Depression Physical
Condition/Depression
n % s.e n % s.e n % s.e x2 p-value x2 p-value
Work 51 7.3 1.0 1 1.4 1.4 11 15.94 4.4 6.397 0.01 9.28 0.003
Home 119 16.0 1.4 10 13.2 3.9 25 35.21 5.7 16.40 0.001 9.84 0.002
Social 56 8.9 1.1 3 4.8 2.8 11 16.42 4.5 4.013 0.045 4.46 0.04
Relation 60 9.5 1.2 4 6.4 3.1 11 16.18 4.5 2.99 0.08 3.11 0.081

Table 5 presents the means of the sum of the SDS ratings in the four domains for each of the disorders. Comparisons are made between males and females and between MDD and each of the other disorders. The mean rating for depression (13.3) was the highest among the disorders. Males and females had similar scores for each of the disorders except for arthritis where females scored significantly higher than males (11.9 vs. 9.9). Subjects with MDD had significantly higher levels of disability than those with any of the disorders. The mean score of subjects with MDD on SDS was significantly higher than the score for each of the disorders. The difference was highest between depression and arthritis (−27.50) and least between depression and diabetes (−3.74).

Table 5.

Sex and disorder comparisons of global Sheehan Disability Scale rating

Condition Male Female Total Male vs Female Depression vs. physical
condition*
n x s.e n x s.e n X s.e Z p-value Z p
Depression 5 14.5 2.5 40 12.5 1.7 65 13.3 1.4 −0.56 0.58
Arthritis 221 9.9 0.6 233 11.9 0.7 454 10.9 0.5 −2.21 0.03 −27.495 0.001
Back/Neck
Pain
64 11.8 1.2 81 9.8 0.9 145 10.7 0.7 −1.16 0.25 −14.799 0.001
HBP 16 11.5 2.5 12 6.9 2.4 28 9.5 1.8 −0.95 0.34 −7.141 0.01
Asthma 5 9.6 2.6 16 8.6 2.1 21 8.9 1.7 −0.53 0.55 −6.000 0.01
Diabetes 3 2.7 2.7 6 6.0 4.1 9 4.9 2.8 −0.31 0.76 −3.7423 0.01
*

Analysis controlled for age and sex

DISCUSSION

In this paper, we have shown that, among elderly Nigerians, the disability associated with MDD is far in excess of that associated with some common chronic and medical conditions. Compared to elderly persons with arthritis, chronic spinal pain, high blood pressure, asthma or diabetes, those with MDD had worse disability ratings on the SDS and were more likely to be severely disabled both globally and in regard to work, home and social roles.

Our study has limitations. One, diagnosis of pain and medical conditions were based on self-report. Even though conditions such as arthritis and spinal pain were unlikely to be significantly affected by underreporting, those of high blood pressure and diabetes could have been affected by underreporting since, for these conditions, only those who reported having been informed of such diagnosis from their physicians were regarded as cases. Second, the comparisons were based on small numbers in some of the categories. By focussing our analysis only on those with pure disorders and excluding comorbid (depression and physical conditions) cases in our analysis, the numbers were considerably reduced. However, both underreporting and comparing only pure cases would have resulted in conservative estimates of the the extent of differences between the disorders and would thus have served to strengthen rather than weaken our findings. Another limitation is that disability was assessed with a self-report scale rather than by an interviewer using a clinical tool. It could be argued that elderly persons with depression might have rated their functioning much less than it was as a result of their mental condition. d to physical disorders. For example, people with depression might have given overly pessimistic appraisals of their functioning. However, in this sample, as shown in our previous report, there was congruence between self-rated SDS ratings of disability and interviewer assessment of functional limitations, suggesting that the subjective evaluations of disability conducted by the respondents was likely to be valid. The SDS is designed for the rating of condition-specific disability and has been used for both mental and physical disorders in several surveys across the world (23).

Several studies have shown that depression is a highly disabling disorder in the elderly (10, 11, 24). A few studies, conducted in general adult populations, have also shown that depression is commonly associated with greater disability than chronic medical conditions such as arthritis, asthma, diabetes, and angina(7, 25). However, the high prevalence of chronic pain and medical conditions in the elderly could lead to these conditions being presumed to be a more likely cause of disability among them than depression might be. Indeed, in this study, we showed that, compared to depression, arthritis and spinal pain were much more prevalent conditions in the elderly. However, our findings show that depression is a greater cause of disability than any of these conditions. It is instructive that the greater disability associated with depression was not observed only in regard to social roles. Depression was also more impairing than the chronic physical conditions in regard to work and home roles as well.

Several studies have documented the considerable burden associated with depression. Using measures such as absence and disability losses, quality of life, as well overall health scores, previous reports have shown that depression carries comparable, and sometimes worse, consequence than several common physical condition (7, 25-28). Two recent reports of large population-based surveys of general adult populations in the US and several other countries around the world provide particularly compelleing evidence for the comparatively higher burden of disability associated with depression(6, 25). The ISA has extended the results of such studies by showing that among this largely understudied population of elderly persons in a developing country, for whom the profile of both mental and physical disorders can be expected to be substantially different, depression is associated with considerably higher disability burden than arthritis, spinal pain, high blood pressure, asthma and diabetes. In this regard, our findings complement those of Ormel and colleagues (29). These workers, studying a sample of middle-aged and older Dutch respondents, reported that, even though depression and common medical conditions such as arthritis and back pain affect subjectively rated wellbeing and objective evaluations of disability differently, depression nevertheless makes a unique contribution in dysfunction, poor health perception, and well-being that exceeds that of medical conditions(29). It is worthy of note that, safe for some reports(6, 25), when comparisons have been made between depression and chronic physical conditions, disability has not been assessed in a specific manner relative to the disorders. In this study, we have asked respondents to rate the disability associated with each of the conditions. The disability assessments are therefore specific for the conditions reported. It must also be noted that, for the physical conditions, respondents with multiple conditions were asked to identify the most disabling and focus on this for the rating of the SDS. On the other hand, every subject with depression completed the SDS. In essence, the ratings for the physical conditions represented assessment of the more serious cases whereas the ratings of MDD spanned the entire spectrum of severity of that condition. The differences we report between depression and the chronic physical conditions are therefore conservative.

At its current rate of growth, the elderly population in the developing countries will soon represent more than three-quarters of the world's elderly population(21). The common focus on the physical health of the elderly, to the neglect of their mental health, may become even more so as they make increasing demand on the health systems of low and middle-income countries where limited resources are bound to lead to hard choices in the provision of care. Our results should inform a broader approach to health care service for the elderly in these countries. We have shown that the presence of chronic pain and physical conditions is associated with an elevated risk for comorbid MDD. Therefore, elderly persons with any of these conditions should be seen as having an increased likelihood of also being depressed. On top of that, we have shown that, even when chronic pain and physical conditions are not present, elderly persons with MDD are considerably more disabled than those with chronic pain or physical conditions. Thus, any health care policy for the elderly must have the treatment of depression as a priority.

Table 1.

12-month prevalence of major depressive disorder and chronic physical conditions

Condition Male Female Total
n % s.e n % s.e n % s.e x2 p-
value
Depression 66 6.6 0.8 85 7.4 0.8 151 7.0 0.6 0.4 0.5184
Arthritis 646 64.9 1.5 842 72.8 1.3 1488 69.1 1.0 15.5 0.0001
Back/Neck
Pain
492 49.5 1.6 596 51.5 1.5 1088 50.6 1.1 0.9 0.3396
HBP 97 10.0 1.0 119 10.5 0.9 216 10.3 0.7 0.1 0.7185
Asthma 63 6.3 0.8 96 8.3 0.8 159 7.4 0.6 3.0 0.0824
Diabetes 29 3.0 0.6 18 1.6 0.4 47 2.2 0.3 4.7 0.0298

Acknowledgments

We thank Alaba Oyekan and Lola Kola for their assistance in data management and manuscript preparation.

Source of funding: Wellcome Trust provided the funding support for the Ibadan Study of Ageing.

Footnotes

Declaration of Interest: None by both authors.

Contributor Information

OYE GUREJE, Department of Psychiatry, University of Ibadan, University College Hospital, PMB 5116, Ibadan, Nigeria.

ADEDOTUN ADEMOLA, Department of Psychiatry, University of Ibadan, University College Hospital, PMB 5116, Ibadan, Nigeria.

BENJAMIN O. OLLEY, Department of Psychology, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Ustun TB, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Chatterji S, et al. Global burden of depressive disorder in the year 2000. British Journal of Psychiatry. 2004;184:386–392. doi: 10.1192/bjp.184.5.386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Murray C, Lopez A. The global burden of diseases: A comprehensive Assessment of Mortality and Disability From Diseases, Injuries and Risk Factors in 1990 and Projected to 2020. Harvard School of Public Health, World Health Organization and World Bank; Boston, Mass: 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ustun TB, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Chatterji S, et al. Global burden of depressive disorders in the year 2000. British Journal of Psychiatry. 2004;184:386–392. doi: 10.1192/bjp.184.5.386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ford AB, Haug MR, Stange KC, et al. Sustained personal autonomy: a measure of successful aging. Journal of Aging and Health. 2000;12:470–489. doi: 10.1177/089826430001200402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chapman DP, Perry GS, Strine TW. The vital link between chronic disease and depressive disorders. Preventive Chronic Diseases. 2005;2:A14. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Merikangas KR, Ames M, Cui L, et al. The impact of comorbidity of mental and physical conditions on role disability in the US adult household population. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007;64:1180–1188. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.64.10.1180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Moussavi S, Chatterji S, Verdes E, et al. Depression, chronic diseases, and decrements in health: results from the World Health Surveys. Lancet. 2007;370:851–858. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61415-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Beekman ATF, Copeland JR, Prince MJ. Review of community prevalence of depression in later life. Br J Psychatry. 1999;174:307–311. doi: 10.1192/bjp.174.4.307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Baiyewu O, Smith Gamble V, Lane KA, et al. Prevalence estimates of depression in elderly community-dwelling African Americans in Indianapolis and Yoruba in Ibadan, Nigeria. Int Psychogeriatrics. 2007;19:679–689. doi: 10.1017/S1041610207005480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gureje O, Kola L, Afolabi E. Epidemiology of major depressive disorder in elderly Nigerians in the Ibadan Study of Ageing: a community-based survey. Lancet. 2007;370:957–964. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61446-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Beekman ATF, Penninx BWJH, Deeg DJH, et al. The impact of depression on the well-being, disability and use of services in older adults: a longitudinal perspective. Acta Psychiat Scand. 2002;105:20–27. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2002.10078.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gureje O, Ogunniyi A, Kola L, et al. Functional disability among elderly Nigerians: results from the Ibadan Study of Ageing. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54:1784–1789. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00944.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mont D. Measuring health and disability. Lancet. 2007;369:1658–1663. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60752-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ormel J, Kempen GI, Deeg DJ, et al. Functioning, well-being and health perception in late middle-aged and older people: comparing the effects of depressive symptoms and chronic medical conditions. J Amer Geriatr Soc. 1998;46:39–48. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb01011.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gureje O, Alem A. Mental health policy developments in Africa. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2000;78:475–482. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Saraceno B, van Ommeren M, Batniji R, et al. Barriers to improvement of mental health services in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet. 2007;370:1164–1174. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61263-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kessler RC, Ustun TB. The World Mental Health (WMH) Survey Initiative Version of the World Health Organization (WHO) Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) International Journal of Methods of Psychiatric Research. 2004;13:93–121. doi: 10.1002/mpr.168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th edn) (DSM-IV) APA; Washington, D.C.: 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.National Center for Health Statistics Evaluation of National Health Interview Survey diagnostic reporting. Vital and Health Statistics 2. 1994;120:1–116. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sheehan DV, Harnnet-Sheehan K, Raj BA. The measurement of disability. International Clinical Psychopharmacology. 1996;11:89–95. doi: 10.1097/00004850-199606003-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.World Health Organization Health futures. 1999. Available: http://www.who.int/hpr/expo.
  • 22.StataCorp . Stata Statistical Software: Release 6.0. Stata Corp; College Station, Tex: 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Scott KM, Bruffaerts R, Simon GE, et al. Obesity and mental disorders in the general population: results from the World Mental Health Surveys. Int J Obes. 2008;32:192–200. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Alexopoulos GS, Vrontou C, Kakuma T, et al. Disability in geriatric depression. American Journal of Psychiatry. 1996;153:877–885. doi: 10.1176/ajp.153.7.877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ormel J, Petukhova M, Chatterji S, et al. Disability and treatment of specific mental and physical disorders across the world. British Journal of Psychatry. 2008;192:368–375. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.039107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Manuel DG, Schultz SE, Kopec JA. Measuring the health burden of chronic disease and injury using health adjusted life expectancy and the Health Utilities Index. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2002;56:843–850. doi: 10.1136/jech.56.11.843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Goetzel RZ, Hawkins K, Ozminkowski RJ, et al. The health and productivity cost burden of the “top 10” physical and mental health conditions affecting six large U.S. employers in 1999. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2003;45:5–14. doi: 10.1097/00043764-200301000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sprangers MA, de Regt EB, Andries F, et al. Which chronic conditions are associated with better or poorer quality of life? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2000;53:895–907. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00204-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ormel J, Kempen GI, Deeg DJ, et al. Functioning, well-being, and health perception in late middle-aged and older people: comparing the effects of depressive symptoms and chronic medical conditions. Journal of American Geriatric Society. 1998;46:39–48. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb01011.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES