Skip to main content
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 2009 Dec 22;30(5):1182–1198. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00690-09

A New Role for Sterol Regulatory Element Binding Protein 1 Transcription Factors in the Regulation of Muscle Mass and Muscle Cell Differentiation

Virginie Lecomte 1,2,3,4,5, Emmanuelle Meugnier 1,2,3,4,5, Vanessa Euthine 1,2,3,4,5, Christine Durand 1,2,3,4,5, Damien Freyssenet 6, Georges Nemoz 1,2,3,4,5, Sophie Rome 1,2,3,4,5, Hubert Vidal 1,2,3,4,5, Etienne Lefai 1,2,3,4,5,*
PMCID: PMC2820883  PMID: 20028734

Abstract

The role of the transcription factors sterol regulatory element binding protein 1a (SREBP-1a) and SREBP-1c in the regulation of cholesterol and fatty acid metabolism has been well studied; however, little is known about their specific function in muscle. In the present study, analysis of recent microarray data from muscle cells overexpressing SREBP1 suggested that they may play a role in the regulation of myogenesis. We then demonstrated that SREBP-1a and -1c inhibit myoblast-to-myotube differentiation and also induce in vivo and in vitro muscle atrophy. Furthermore, we have identified the transcriptional repressors BHLHB2 and BHLHB3 as mediators of these effects of SREBP-1a and -1c in muscle. Both repressors are SREBP-1 target genes, and they affect the expression of numerous genes involved in the myogenic program. Our findings identify a new role for SREBP-1 transcription factors in muscle, thus linking the control of muscle mass to metabolic pathways.


The sterol regulatory element binding protein (SREBP) transcription factors belong to the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) leucine zipper family of DNA-binding proteins. The three isoforms identified thus far in mammalian tissues are coded by two distinct genes, Srebf1 and Srebf2, and vary in structure, regulation, and functions (14). SREBP-1a and SREBP-1c proteins are produced by alternative promoter usage of the SREBF1 gene and are key actors of the regulation of genes related to lipid metabolism, especially those involved in lipogenesis and triglyceride deposition. In contrast, SREBP-2 has been more closely associated with cholesterol synthesis and accumulation (20, 52).

In agreement with these known functions, the SREBP-1 proteins are strongly expressed in tissues with high lipogenic capacities, such as liver and adipose tissues. However, significant expression has been also reported in skeletal muscle, both in vivo and in vitro, in cultured muscle cells (12, 13, 18). In muscle, SREBP-1 expression is induced by activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt and the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathways by insulin and growth factors (6, 12, 18, 28, 38), suggesting additional functions of these transcription factors in a tissue with a low rate of lipid synthesis. Using microarray analysis to characterize the role of SREBP-1a and -1c in skeletal muscle, we have recently identified some of their potential target genes in primary cultures of human myotubes overexpressing SREBP-1a or SREBP-1c (43). In the present study, we found that SREBP-1a and -1c regulate more than 1,000 genes, indicating that they are potentially involved in the regulation of a large variety of biological functions in muscle cells. Quite unexpectedly, we observed a dramatic reduction in the expression of a number of muscle-specific genes and markers of muscle differentiation in cells overexpressing SREBP-1 proteins. This led us to investigate their potential role in the regulation of myogenesis and muscle development.

The early stages of muscle development are regulated by muscle-specific bHLH transcription factors (e.g., MYF5, MYOD1, MYOG [myogenin], and MYF6 [MRF4]), which are also involved in the differentiation of satellite cells during the regeneration process in adult muscle. Recently, the transcriptional factor BHLHB3 was shown to inhibit in vitro muscle cell differentiation by interacting with MYOD1 (2). BHLHB3 (also named DEC1/SHARP1) is a transcriptional repressor closely related (97% homology in amino acid sequence in the bHLH domain) to BHLHB2 (also named Stra13/DEC2/SHARP2). They both repress the expression of target genes by binding to E-Box sequences, as well as through protein-protein interactions with other transcription factors (reviewed in reference 51). BHLHB2 and BHLHB3 genes are widely expressed in both embryonic and adult tissues and their expression is regulated in cell type-specific manner in various biological processes, including circadian rhythms (19), hypoxia (35), or cellular differentiation (7). Their involvement in the regulation of developmental processes during embryogenesis has been largely studied (4, 7, 24, 34, 44). We demonstrate here that BHLHB2 and BHLHB3 mediate negative effects of SREBP-1 transcription factors on myogenesis, acting at both the myoblast and the myotube stages. The SREBP-1-mediated effects on BHLHB2 and BHLHB3 activity thus defines a novel negative regulation pathway in skeletal muscle cell development.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Culture of human skeletal muscle cells.

Muscle biopsies were taken from healthy lean subjects during surgical procedure, with the approval of the Ethics Committee of Lyon Hospitals. Myoblasts were purified, and differentiated myotubes were prepared according to a procedure previously described in detail (11).

Expression vectors and generation of recombinant adenoviruses.

For the construction of expression vector encoding BHLHB2, a verified sequence IMAGE clone (cloneID 4860809) was purchased from Geneservice (Cambridge, United Kingdom) and subcloned into the pcDNA 3.1 expression vector (Invitrogen). The expression vector encoding BHLH3 was generated by PCR amplification and ligated into PCDNA3.1. Expression vector encoding the dominant-negative form of SREBP-1 (ADD1-DN) is a generous gift of B. Spiegelman (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA) (27). Recombinant adenoviral genomes carrying the human BHLHB2 or BHLHB3 or ADD1-DN were generated by homologous recombination in the VmAdcDNA3 plasmid (a gift from S. Rusconi, Fribourg, Switzerland) and amplified as described previously (9, 12).

Construction of expression vectors encoding mature nuclear forms of human SREBP-1a (named pCMV-hSREBP1a) and SREBP-1c (named pCMV-hSREBP1c) was described previously (12). A fragment of the pIRES plasmid (Clontech, Mountain View, CA) containing the internal ribosome entry site (IRES) and enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) sequence was cloned into pCMV-hSREBP1a and pCMV-hSREBP1c to obtain pCMV-hSREBP1a-IRES-GFP and pCMV-hSREBP1c-IRES-GFP. Recombinant adenoviruses expressing simultaneously nuclear forms of either SREBP-1a or SREBP-1c and GFP as a marker were generated by homologous recombination in the VmAdcDNA3 plasmid and amplified.

Overexpression of human SREBP-1a, SREBP-1c, BHLHB2, or BHLHB3 in human muscle cells.

The construction of recombinant adenoviruses encoding nuclear SREBP-1a and SREBP-1c was described previously (12). Human muscle cells were infected as myoblasts or myotubes. Myoblasts were grown in six-well plates. Myoblasts at 70% confluence or myotubes after 5 days of differentiation were infected for 48 h with the recombinant adenovirus encoding BHLHB2 or BHLHB3 or nuclear forms of SREBP-1a or SREBP-1c or GFP as a control.

Inhibition of BHLHB2 and BHLHB3 expression in human muscle cells.

Inhibition of BHLHB2 and BHLHB3 expression was performed by RNA interference using small interfering RNA (siRNA) against BHLHB2 and against BHLHB3 (Qiagen). A rhodamine labeled GFP-22 siRNA was used as control. Myoblasts at 70% confluence were transfected with siRNAs using the Hiperfect transfection reagent (Qiagen, Courtaboeuf, France) according to the manufacturer's protocol.

In vivo overexpression of human SREBP-1a, SREBP-1c, BHLHB2, and BHLHB3 in mice tibialis anterior muscles.

All animal procedures were conducted according to the national guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals. Adult (12- to 14-week-old) BALB/c male mice (Harlan, France) were subjected to adenoviral delivery according to the procedure described by Sapru et al. (45). Briefly, right tibialis anterior muscles of mice were injected with 1010 infectious units of recombinant adenovirus expressing either SREBP-1a/GFP, SREBP-1c/GFP, BHLHB2, or BHLHB3. As a control, the contralateral tibialis anterior muscles were also injected with 1010 infectious units of recombinant adenovirus expressing GFP. Mice were sacrificed 7 days after injection. The tibialis anterior muscle was removed and immediately snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. Sections (10 μm) were cut, and every tenth section was collected onto glass slides for examination under fluorescence illumination using an Axiovert 200 microscope, an Axiocam MRm camera, and Axiovision 4.1 image acquisition software (Carl Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany). Muscle fiber sizes and fluorescence intensities were measured by using NIH ImageJ software.

Protein expression analysis by immunocytofluorescence.

Cells were fixed in 10% formaldehyde and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100. Nonspecific binding sites were blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin in 1× phosphate-buffered saline for 1 h at room temperature. Cells were then incubated overnight at 4°C with specific primary antibodies (anti-TNNI1, C-19; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA; antimyogenin, F5D; Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA). Detection was achieved by using Alexa 555-conjugated donkey anti-goat and goat anti-mouse IgG (Molecular Probes/Invitrogen).

Cells were mounted with Vectashield with DAPI Fluoprep mounting medium (H1200; Vector Laboratories, Peterborough, England) and examined by fluorescence microscopy using an Axiovert 200 microscope, an Axiocam MRm camera, and Axiovision 4.1 image acquisition software. The area of TNNI1 immunostained differentiated myotubes was measured by using NIH ImageJ software.

Protein expression analysis by Western blotting.

Classical Western blot experiments were performed as described previously (12). After transfer, gels were stained with Coomassie blue. Membranes were then incubated overnight at 4°C with the following specific primary antibodies: anti-SREBP-1 (H160), anti-MYOD1 (M316), anti-MEF2C (E17), anti-MYOG (M225), anti-TNNI1 (C-19), and anti-TNNI2 (C-19) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA); anti-BHLHB2 (M01; 5B1); and anti-BHLHB3 (M01; 4H6) from Abnova (Taipei, Taiwan).

The signal was detected by using a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody and revealed with the enhanced chemiluminescence system (Pierce, Rockford, IL). Signal was quantified by using NIH ImageJ software. The intensity of Coomassie blue staining was used to normalize the total amount of proteins.

Quantification of mRNAs by real-time RT-PCR.

Total RNA was isolated by using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Courtaboeuf, France) according to the manufacturer's instructions. First-strand cDNAs were synthesized from 500 ng of total RNAs in the presence of 100 U of Superscript II (Invitrogen) and a mixture of random hexamers and oligo(dT) primers (Promega). Real-time PCR assays were performed with Rotor-Gene 6000 (Corbett Research, Mortlake, Australia). A list of the primers and real-time PCR assay conditions are available from the authors upon request. The results were normalized by using RPLP0 or HPRT (hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase) mRNA concentration, measured as reference gene in each sample.

ChIP assay.

The chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments were performed as previously described (43) using a ChIP It Express enzymatic kit from Active Motif (Rixensart, Belgium) according to the manufacturer's instructions. ChIP products were analyzed by quantitative and classical PCR using specific primers for BHLHB2 and BHLHB3 promoter (PCR primers are available on request).

Construction of reporter plasmids and BHLHB2 and BHLHB3 promoter activity.

A human genomic clone (NR5-IH18RS), which contains NotI flanking regions corresponding to the BHLHB2 promoter was obtained from E. R. Zabarovsky (Microbiology and Tumor Biology Center and Center for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden). The −408/+75 (according to the transcription starting site) fragment was then subcloned into the luciferase reporter gene vector pGL3-Enhancer (Promega) to obtain pB21 (−408/+75). The −951/-407 fragment was generated by PCR and ligated into pB21 to obtain pB22 (−951/+75). The constructs pB23 (−264/+75) and pB26 (−187/+75) were generated by deletion of pB21. To obtain pB32, two genomic fragments, corresponding to the −940/−289 and −524/+238 regions of the BHLHB3 gene, were generated by PCR and combined to obtain the −940/+238 fragment into pGL3-E vector. Mutations of the SRE motifs were performed as described previously (12). Mutagenesis was performed to replace bases 2, 4, and 6 of each identified SRE by thymidine residues (QuikChange mutagenesis kit; Qiagen).

Transfection studies were carried out on myoblasts or myotubes plated in 12-well plates as previously described (12). Firefly and Renilla luciferase activities (dual luciferase reporter assay system; Promega) were measured by using a Centro LB 960 Luminometer (Berthold Technology, Thoiry, France).

Microarray analysis of myotubes overexpressing BHLHB2 and BHLHB3.

The procedure used to obtain and analyze microarray data has previously been described (43). Briefly, total RNA extracted from BHLHB2 and BHLHB3 overexpressing myotubes were hybridized on oligonucleotide microarrays produced by the French Genopole Network (RNG) consisting of 25,342 oligonucleotides of 50-mers printed on glass slides. Only spots with recorded data on the eight slides (four for BHLHB2 and four for BHLHB3) were selected for further analysis. With these selection criteria, 12,825 spots were retrieved. The data were analyzed by using the one-class significance analysis of microarray (SAM) procedure. Microarrays data are available in the GEO database under accession number GSE12947 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi).

RESULTS

SREBP-1a and -1c downregulate muscle-specific genes in human myotubes.

We recently reported that adenovirus-mediated expression of the mature nuclear forms of either SREBP-1a or SREBP-1c triggered the regulation of more than 1,300 genes in human differentiated myotubes (43). Using FATiGO software (Babelomics) to analyze these microarray data, three Gene Ontology (GO) classes showed significant over-representation in the list of genes found to be regulated in the presence of SREBP-1 proteins compared to their representation in the human genome: “muscle contraction” (GO 0006936, adjusted P value = 2.84 e−5), the subclass “striated muscle contraction” (GO 0006941, adjusted P value = 2.46 e−5), and “muscle development” (GO 0007517, adjusted P value = 6.27 e−5). The corresponding genes with fold change values upon SREBP-1a or -1c expression are listed in Table 1. These genes encode transcription factors involved in muscle differentiation (i.e., MYOD1, MYOG, and MEF2C), as well as a large number of muscle contraction proteins (i.e., heavy and light chains of myosin, troponins, and titin). Most of them were downregulated in the presence of SREBP-1a or -1c (28 of 38 for “muscle contraction” and 26 of 39 for “muscle development”).

TABLE 1.

Muscle specific SREBP-1 target genesa

Symbolb LLID Fold
Description
1A 1C
GO 0006936: muscle contraction (2.84 e−5)
    ADRB2 154 -2.48 -2.61 Adrenergic, β2-receptor, surface
    ALDOA 226 2.06 Aldolase A; fructose bisphosphate
    ATP1A1 476 -2.27 ATPase; Na+/K+ transporting; α1 polypeptide
    ATP1A2 477 -2.31 ATPase; Na+/K+ transporting; α2 (+) polypeptide
    ATP2A2 488 -1.86 ATPase; Ca2+ transporting. cardiac muscle; slow twitch 2
    CACNG1 786 -7.42 Calcium channel; voltage dependent; gamma subunit 1
    CASQ2 845 -3.45 Calsequestrin 2 (cardiac muscle)
    CHRNA1 1134 -1.96 Cholinergic receptor; nicotinic; α1 (muscle)
    DTNA 1837 -4.02 -3.01 Dystrobrevin; α
    EDNRA 1909 -3.21 Endothelin receptor type A
    FXYD1 5348 3.31 FXYD domain containing ion transport regulator 1 (phospholemman)
    GAL 2660 4.28 Galanin
    GJA1 2697 -4.83 -2.02 Gap junction protein, α1; 43 kDa (connexin 43)
    HRC 3270 -2.72 Histidine-rich calcium-binding protein
    ID2B 84099 -1.60 Inhibitor of DNA-binding 2B; dominant-negative helix-loop-helix protein
    KBTBD10 10324 -1.60 Kelch repeat and BTB (POZ) domain containing 10
    KCNH2 3757 -1.73 Potassium voltage-gated channel; subfamily H (eag-related); member 2
    MRCL3 10627 -1.63 Myosin regulatory light chain MRCL3
    MYBPC1 4604 -4.62 Myosin binding protein C; slow type
    MYBPC2 4606 14.91 10.04 Myosin binding protein C; fast type
    MYBPH 4608 -19.98 Myosin binding protein H
    MYH2 4620 -6.45 Myosin heavy polypeptide 2; skeletal muscle; adult
    MYH3 80184 16.48 Myosin heavy polypeptide 3
    MYH6 4624 3.47 Myosin heavy polypeptide 6; cardiac muscle alpha
    MYH8 4626 -8.82 -2.39 Myosin heavy polypeptide 8; skeletal muscle. perinatal
    SCN7A 6332 2.64 Sodium channel; voltage gated; type VII alpha
    SLC6A8 6535 -1.47 Solute carrier family 6 (neurotransmitter transporter, creatine), member 8
    SMPX 23676 -8.55 Small muscle protein, X-linked
    SNTA1 6640 1.70 Syntrophin, α1 (dystrophin-associated protein A1)
    SSPN 8082 -3.15 Sarcospan (Kras oncogene-associated gene)
    TNNC2 7125 -2.83 Troponin C type 2 (fast)
    TNNI1 7135 -2.32 Troponin I type 1 (skeletal. slow)
    TNNI2 7136 -3.07 Troponin I type 2 (skeletal. fast)
    TNNT2 7139 -1.88 Troponin T type 2 (cardiac)
    TNNT3 7140 -2.83 Troponin T type 3 (skeletal, fast)
    TPM1 7168 -4.54 Tropomyosin 1 (α)
    TPM3 7170 -2.44 Tropomyosin 3
    TTN 7273 1.92 2.93 Titin
GO 0007517: muscle development (6.27 e−5)
    ACTG1 71 -2.86 -2.37 Actin, γ1
    AEBP1 165 2.29 AE binding protein 1
    CAV3 859 -1.94 Caveolin 3
    COL5A3 50509 -1.53 Collagen type V, α3
    COL6A3 1293 1.40 Collagen type VI, α3
    CSRP2 1466 -4.25 Cysteine- and glycine-rich protein 2
    CUGBP2 10659 -1.80 CUG triplet repeat, RNA binding protein 2
    DSCR1 1827 -2.18 -1.78 Down syndrome critical region gene 1
    EVC 2121 -1.50 Ellis van Creveld syndrome
    FHL1 2273 -4.99 Four and a half LIM domain 1
    FXYD1 5348 3.31 FXYD domain containing ion transport regulator 1 (phospholemman)
    GDF8 2660 -6.20 -1.98 Growth differentiation factor 8 (myostatin)
    HBEGF 1839 5.22 4.10 Heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor
    HDAC5 10014 2.35 Histone deacetylase 5
    HDAC9 9734 -2.15 Histone deacetylase 9
    HSBP2 3316 -3.37 Heat shock 27-kDa protein 2
    ITGA7 3679 -2.40 Integrin α7
    ITGB1BP2 26548 -4.72 Integrin β1 binding protein (melusin) 2
    KRT19 3880 2.50 Keratin 19
    MEF2C 4208 -6.73 -3.45 Myocyte enhancer factor 2C
    MLLT7 4303 1.96 3.40 Myeloid/lymphoid or mixed-lineage leukemia
    MRAS 22808 -3.86 -2.03 Muscle RAS oncogene homolog
    MYH6 4624 3.47 Myosin heavy polypeptide 6. cardiac muscle, alpha
    MYH10 4628 2.28 Myosin heavy polypeptide 10, nonmuscle
    MYL1 4632 -4.16 Myosin light polypeptide 1, alkali; skeletal. fast
    MYL4 4635 2.28 Myosin light polypeptide 4, alkali, atrial. embryonic
    MYOD1 4654 -2.76 Myogenic differentiation 1
    MYOG 4656 -7.42 Myogenin (myogenic factor 4)
    NRD1 4898 3.97 2.59 Nardilysin (N-arginine dibasic convertase)
    SGCD 6444 -5.09 Sarcoglycan delta (35-kDa dystrophin-associated glycoprotein)
    SGCG 6445 -2.42 Sarcoglycan gamma (35-kDa dystrophin-associated glycoprotein)
    SIX1 6495 -3.88 -2.85 Sine oculis homeobox homolog 1 (Drosophila)
    SMAD3 4088 -1.82 -1.78 SMAD, mothers against DPP homolog 3
    SNTA1 6640 1.70 Syntrophin, α1 (dystrophin-associated protein A1)
    TEAD4 7004 -3.54 TEA domain family member 4
    TMOD1 7111 -3.01 Tropomodulin 1
    TNNT2 7139 -1.88 Troponin T type 2 (cardiac)
    TTN 7273 1.92 2.93 Titin
    VAMP5 10791 -3.03 Vesicle-associated membrane protein 5 (myobrevin)
a

Listing of 1300 SREBP-1 targets genes identified previously (43) was analyzed by using FATiGO. Three GO classes were found to be statistically over-represented: muscle contraction (GO 0006936, adjusted P value = 1.66 e−4), striated muscle contraction (GO 0006941, adjusted P value = 7.29 e−5) and muscle development (GO 0007517, adjusted P value = 6.51 e−5).

b

The adjusted P values are indicated in parentheses.

Transcriptional repressor BHLHB2 and BHLHB3 genes are SREBP-1 target genes.

The SREBP-1s microarray data obtained on differentiated myotubes contain two bHLH family members that are upregulated upon SREBP-1s overexpression. The transcriptional repressors BHLHB2 and BHLHB3 show an ∼2-fold increase in their expression levels (see the supplemental data in reference 43). Since recent report indicated that BHLHB3 is a potent inhibitor of muscle cell differentiation (2), we decided to focus on these factors. To assess SREBP-1a and -1c effects on BHLHB2 and BHLHB3 expression, we overexpressed nuclear SREBP-1 in human primary muscle cells at both myoblast and myotube stages and also in vivo in mouse tibialis anterior muscle. As shown in Fig. 1, overexpression of SREBP-1 in myoblasts, myotubes, and mouse muscle induced significant increases in both BHLHB2 and BHLHB3 mRNA and protein levels in all situations. As a control, we verified that overexpression of ADD1-DN, a dominant-negative mutant of SREBP-1 (27), does not significantly affect BHLHB2 and BHLHB3 expression levels in cultured muscle cells.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

BHLHB2 and -B3 are upregulated upon SREBP-1 overexpression. (A) mRNA levels of BHLHB2 and BHLHB3 in myoblasts, myotubes and mouse TA muscle overexpressing GFP, SREBP-1a, SREBP-1c, or ADD1-DN. (B) Protein levels of SREBP-1, BHLHB2, and BHLHB3 in myotubes overexpressing GFP, SREBP-1a, SREBP-1c, or ADD1-DN. An illustrative immunoblot on the left and a quantification of the results on the right are shown. Coomassie blue (Coom) staining was used to normalize the total amount of proteins. The results are presented as means ± the SEM. *, P ≤ 0,05; **, P ≤ 0.001 (n = 3).

The promoter sequences of the human BHLHB2 and BHLHB3 genes contain putative SRE motifs for SREBP-1 binding (located at −839/−830 and −32/−23 for BHLHB2; −651/−642 and + 43/+52 for BHLHB3 relative to the respective transcription start sites). In addition, a degenerate motif was identified at −248/−238 (TCACAGGGT) in the BHLHB2 promoter. To investigate whether SREBP-1a and -1c increase BHLHB2 and BHLHB3 expression through promoter activation, we performed gene reporter experiments in muscle and nonmuscle cell lines transiently transfected with SREBP-1a- and/or SREBP-1c-expressing plasmids. Measurements of luciferase activities confirm that overexpression of SREBP-1 proteins strongly increases both BHLHB2 and BHLHB3 promoter activities in myoblasts, myotubes, and nonmuscle HepG2 cells (Fig. 2A and B, left). Activation of the promoters in nonmuscle cells excluded the participation of additional muscle-specific factors in the induction of BHLHB2 and BHLHB3 by SREBP-1 proteins. To assess the involvement of the identified putative SREs in both promoters, we performed mutations and deletions of the various sites (Fig. 2A and B, right). Concerning the BHLHB2 promoter, deletion of the distal motif, as well as mutation of the proximal motif, did not modify enhancement of promoter activity by SREBP-1 proteins, whereas the deletion of the SRE-like motif suppressed SREBP-1 activation. Concerning the BHLHB3 promoter, mutation of either distal or proximal SREs suppressed promoter activation, showing that they are both are involved in the response to SREBP-1. Finally, ChIP experiments further confirmed that SREBP-1 proteins directly bind the BHLHB2 and BHLHB3 promoters (Fig. 2C).

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

BHLHB2 and -B3 genes are SREBP-1 target genes. BHLHB2 (A, left panel) and BHLHB3 (B, left panel) promoter activity in myoblasts, myotubes, and HepG2 cells cotransfected with reporter gene plasmid pB22 or pB32 and expression vectors encoding either human SREBP-1a (pCDNA-hSREBP1a) or SREBP-1c (pCDNA-hSREBP1c), or empty pCDNA3 as control. On the right panels, relative luciferase activity in HepG2 cells of constructs harboring mutations of SRE motifs identified in either BHLHB2 (A) or BHLHB3 (B) promoters. (C) Recruitment of SREBP1 on BHLHB2 and BHLHB3 promoters determined by ChIP experiments carried on insulin-treated HEK 293 cells. ChIP products were analyzed by quantitative and classical PCR. The results are presented as means ± the SEM. *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.001 (n = 4).

We then conclude that transcriptional repressors BHLHB2 and B3 are new direct target genes of SREBP-1, the expression of which is increased by SREBP-1 binding on their promoters.

Overexpression of BHLHB2 and BHLHB3 in myotubes.

We performed microarray analysis in human primary myotubes overexpressing either BHLHB2 or BHLHB3 after adenovirus infection. FATiGO analysis revealed that the same biological processes identified after SREBP-1 overexpression (“muscle contraction,” “striated muscle contraction,” and “muscle development”) were significantly enriched (adjusted P values < 0.05) in the lists of regulated genes. We found that BHLHB2 and BHLHB3 downregulated 69 and 65 genes with muscle annotation, respectively (Table 2). Furthermore, the comparison with the SREBP-1 microarray data showed that a large proportion (34%) of the muscle-specific genes that were downregulated by SREBP-1 expression were also downregulated by BHLHB2/B3 overexpression.

TABLE 2.

Muscle-specific BHLHB2/B3 target genesa

LLID Symbol Fold
Description
B2 B3
58 ACTA1 -2.89 -4.55 Actin, α1, skeletal muscle
70 ACTC -1.78 -2.75 Actin, α, cardiac muscle
88 ACTN2 -1.69 Actinin, α2
89 ACTN3 -2.67 -3.27 Actinin, α3
203 AK1 -1.56 -2.19 Adenylate kinase 1
10930 APOBEC2 -1.76 Apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide-like 2
57679 ALS2 1.75 Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis 2 (juvenile)
130540 ALS2CR12 1.41 Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis 2 (juvenile) chromosome region, candidate 12
26287 ANKRD2 -1.52 Ankyrin repeat domain 2 (stretch responsive muscle)
316 AOX1 1.51 Aldehyde oxidase 1
487 ATP2A1 -1.83 ATPase, Ca2+ transporting, cardiac muscle, fast twitch 1
444 ASPH 1.57 Aspartate β-hydroxylase
79888 AYTL2 1.80 Acyltransferase-like 2
8678 BECN1 1.36 Beclin 1 (coiled-coil, myosin-like BCL2 interacting protein)
779 CACNA1S -1.36 -1.68 Calcium channel, voltage-dependent, L type, α1S subunit
782 CACNB1 -2.85 Calcium channel, voltage-dependent, β1 subunit
786 CACNG1 -2.06 -5.29 Calcium channel, voltage-dependent, gamma subunit 1
823 CAPN1 1.37 Calpain 1 (mu/I) large subunit
84698 CAPS2 1.34 Calcyphosine 2
859 CAV3 -1.73 -3.44 Caveolin 3
928 CD9 1.96 CD9 molecule
1013 CDH15 -2.07 Cadherin 15, M-cadherin (myotubule)
50937 CDON -1.59 -2.79 Cdon homolog (mouse)
1072 CFL1 -1.38 Cofilin 1 (nonmuscle)
1134 CHRNA1 -1.71 Cholinergic receptor, nicotinic, α1 (muscle)
1146 CHRNG -2.34 -2.31 Cholinergic receptor, nicotinic, γ
1152 CKB -1.42 Creatine kinase, brain
1158 CKM -2.33 -2.90 Creatine kinase, muscle
1160 CKMT2 -4.09 -3.86 Creatine kinase, mitochondrial 2 (sarcomeric)
50509 COL5A3 -1.74 -1.62 Collagen type V, α3
1339 COX6A2 -1.55 Cytochrome c oxidase subunit VIa polypeptide 2
1410 CRYAB -2.02 -2.12 Crystallin, αB
1674 DES -1.58 -1.80 Desmin
25891 DKFZP586H2123 1.35 Regeneration-associated muscle protease
1760 DMPK -1.97 -2.84 Dystrophia myotonica protein kinase
1837 DTNA 1.89 Dystrobrevin, alpha
1838 DTNB -1.49 Dystrobrevin, beta
8291 DYSF -1.59 Dysferlin, limb girdle muscular dystrophy 2B (autosomal recessive)
1917 EEF1A2 -1.98 -2.26 Eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 α2
112399 EGLN3 Egl nine homolog 3 (C. elegans)
2027 ENO3 -1.82 -1.91 Enolase 3 (beta, muscle)
114907 FBXO32 2.07 F-box protein 32
2281 FKBP1B 2.16 FK506 binding protein 1B, 12.6 kDa
2318 FLNC -2.30 Filamin C, gamma (actin binding protein 280)
2308 FOXO1 -1.46 -2.20 Forkhead box O1
2660 GDF8 2.18 Growth differentiation factor 8
93626 GNA11 1.34 Guanine nucleotide binding protein (G protein), α11 (Gq class)
2997 GYS1 -1.83 Glycogen synthase 1 (muscle)
9759 HDAC4 -1.57 -1.69 Histone deacetylase 4
3270 HRC -1.58 -1.68 Histidine-rich calcium binding protein
3679 ITGA7 -1.59 Integrin, α7
10324 KBTBD10 1.86 Kelch repeat and BTB (POZ) domain containing 10
3939 LDHA -1.55 Lactate dehydrogenase A
6300 MAPK12 -1.97 -2.85 Mitogen-activated protein kinase 12
4151 MB -1.90 -1.52 Myoglobin
10150 MBNL2 1.57 Muscleblind-like 2 (Drosophila)
4208 MEF2C -1.95 MADS box transcription enhancer factor 2, polypeptide C (myocyte enhancer factor 2C)
22808 MRAS -2.11 Muscle RAS oncogene homolog
23164 M-RIP -1.84 Myosin phosphatase-Rho interacting protein
103910 MRLC2 1.57 Myosin regulatory light chain MRLC2
136319 MTPN 1.76 Myotrophin
4604 MYBPC1 -1.69 Myosin binding protein C, slow type
4608 MYBPH -2.69 Myosin binding protein H
4620 MYH2 -1.76 Myosin heavy polypeptide 2, skeletal muscle, adult
80184 MYH3 (CEP290) -1.69 -3.82 Myosin heavy polypeptide 3
4624 MYH6 -1.41 -1.71 Myosin heavy polypeptide 6, cardiac muscle, alpha
4625 MYH7 -1.70 -3.28 Myosin heavy chain 7, cardiac muscle, beta
8735 MYH13 -1.42 Myosin heavy chain 13
4632 MYL1 -1.41 Myosin light polypeptide 1, alkali; skeletal, fast
4633 MYL2 -1.81 -2.23 Myosin light chain 2, regulatory, cardiac, slow
4634 MYL3 -1.69 -1.72 Myosin light chain 3, alkali; ventricular, skeletal, slow
4636 MYL5 -1.84 Myosin light chain 5, regulatory
93408 MYLC2PL 1.31 Myosin light chain 2, precursor lymphocyte-specific
85366 MYLK2 1.33 Myosin light chain kinase 2, skeletal muscle
53904 MYO3A 1.48 Myosin IIIA
4645 MYO5B -1.54 Myosin VB (GDB)
4654 MYOD1 -1.71 Myogenic differentiation 1
4656 MYOG -1.91 -5.79 Myogenin (myogenic factor 4)
9172 MYOM2 -3.03 -3.11 Myomesin (M-protein) 2, 165 kDa
9499 MYOT -2.95 -3.67 Myotilin
84665 MYPN -1.60 Myopalladin
4692 NDN 1.44 Necdin homolog (mouse)
4703 NEB -1.72 Nebulin
84033 OBSCN -1.39 -2.46 Obscurin, cytoskeletal calmodulin and titin-interacting RhoGEF
55229 PANK4 -1.32 Pantothenate kinase 4
5081 PAX7 -1.42 Paired box 7
5213 PFKM -1.48 Phosphofructokinase, muscle
5224 PGAM2 -2.57 -2.60 Phosphoglycerate mutase 2 (muscle)
64091 POPDC2 -1.36 Popeye domain containing 2
64208 POPDC3 -1.78 Popeye domain containing 3
10891 PPARGC1A -2.32 Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma, coactivator 1α
4659 PPP1R12A 1.45 Protein phosphatase 1, regulatory (inhibitor) subunit 12A
53632 PRKAG3 -2.16 -6.45 Protein kinase, AMP-activated, γ3 noncatalytic subunit
89970 RSPRY1 -1.43 Ring finger and SPRY domain containing 1
6415 SEPW1 -1.40 -1.48 Selenoprotein W, 1
6444 SGCD -1.61 -1.39 Sarcoglycan, delta (35-kDa dystrophin-associated glycoprotein)
6445 SGCG -1.96 Sarcoglycan, gamma (35-kDa dystrophin-associated glycoprotein)
6526 SLC5A3 -1.93 Sodium/myoinositol cotransporter 1
6535 SLC6A8 -1.59 Solute carrier family 6 (neurotransmitter transporter, creatine), member 8
6586 SLIT3 -3.95 Slit homolog 3 (Drosophila)
6641 SNTB1 -1.92 Syntrophin, β1 (dystrophin-associated protein A1, 59 kDa, basic component 1)
8878 SQSTM1 1.52 Sarcospan (Kras oncogene-associated gene)
8082 SSPN -1.69 Sarcospan (Kras oncogene-associated gene)
6840 SVIL 1.52 -1.39 Titin-cap (telethonin)
23345 SYNE1 1.40 Supervillin
8557 TCAP -1.80 Spectrin repeat containing, nuclear envelope 1
7004 TEAD4 -2.37 -4.18 TEA domain family member 4
7111 TMOD1 -2.13 Tropomodulin 1
29766 TMOD3 1.66 1.49 Tropomodulin 3 (ubiquitous)
7134 TNNC1 -1.59 Troponin C type 1 (slow)
7135 TNNI1 -2.46 -2.34 Troponin I type 1 (skeletal, slow)
7136 TNNI2 -1.40 -1.52 Troponin I type 2 (skeletal, fast)
7139 TNNT2 -1.48 -2.12 Troponin T type 2 (cardiac)
7140 TNNT3 -2.07 -2.13 Troponin T type 3 (skeletal, fast)
57159 TRIM54 -1.79 Tripartite motif-containing 54
84675 TRIM55 -1.61 -2.56 Tripartite motif-containing 55
84676 TRIM63 -3.91 -4.12 Tripartite motif-containing 63
7273 TTN -1.90 -4.98 Titin
81622 UNC93B1 -1.78 Unc-93 homolog B1 (C. elegans)
7431 VIM 1.82 Vimentin
a

Microarray analysis was performed on human primary muscle cells overexpressing either BHLHB2 or BHLHB3. The listing of BHLHB2/B3 identified target genes was analyzed by using FATiGO software. The biological processes “muscle contraction,” “striated muscle contraction,” and “muscle development” show significant enrichment (adjusted P value < 0.05).

Overlapping downregulated genes for the two GO biological processes “muscle development” and “muscle contraction” are represented in Fig. 3. Among genes involved in muscle differentiation, MYOD1, MYOG, and MEF2C show a decrease in their expression upon both SREBP-1 and BHLHB2/B3 overexpression.

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

Common SREBP-1, BHLHB2, and BHLHB3 downregulated muscle genes. Venn diagrams representing the distribution of SREBP-1, BHLHB2, and BHLHB3 downregulated genes corresponding to “muscle development” (GO 0007517) (A) and “muscle contraction” (GO 0006936) (B) are shown. Overlapping genes are listed on the right.

SREBP-1a and -1c inhibit myoblast differentiation.

Because the expression of specific markers of muscle differentiation was decreased in myotubes overexpressing SREBP-1, we first examined the expression of the four studied transcription factors during the differentiation of human primary muscle cells (Fig. 4A). All four present a similar pattern of expression with an increase during proliferation and a decrease after induction of differentiation. To further examine whether SREBP-1 could directly affect myogenic differentiation, primary human myoblasts were thus infected with recombinant adenoviruses expressing GFP, SREBP-1a, or SREBP-1c. After 48 h, SREBP-1-expressing myoblasts showed a dramatic decrease in MYOD1, MYOG, and MEF2C levels (Fig. 4B). When the cells were induced to differentiate (medium change and serum starvation) for 5 days, only Ad-GFP-infected cells underwent differentiation (Fig. 4C). The presence of SREBP-1 totally blocked the differentiation of myoblasts into myotubes.

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4.

SREBP1 and BHLHB2/B3 inhibit human myoblasts differentiation. (A) mRNA levels of SREBP-1a, SREBP-1c, BHLHB2, and BHLHB3 in human primary muscle cells showing an increase during proliferation and a decrease after induction of differentiation. (B) mRNA levels of myogenic factors (MYOD, MEF2C, and MYOG) in myoblasts overexpressing GFP, SREBP1a, or SREBP1c. (C) Representative phase-contrast images of myoblasts overexpressing GFP, SREBP1a, or SREBP1c after 5 days of differentiation. Scale bar, 100 μm. (D) mRNA levels of myogenic factors (MYOD, MEF2C, and MYOG) in myoblasts overexpressing GFP, BHLHB2, or BHLHB3. (E) Representative images of myoblasts overexpressing GFP, BHLHB2, or BHLHB3 after 5 days of differentiation. Scale bar, 100 μm. Myogenin (MYOG) and troponin I1 (TNNI1) immunostaining (red), with DAPI staining (blue), was performed to assess the differentiation state. The results are presented as means ± the SEM. *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.001 (n = 3).

To determine the implication of BHLHB2 and/or BHLHB3 in this process, human primary myoblasts were infected with recombinant adenovirus expressing either BHLHB2 or BHLHB3. As shown in Fig. 4D, 48 h of BHLHB2 and BHLHB3 overexpression also induced a marked decrease in the expression of muscle regulatory factors (MYOD1, MYOG, and MEF2C). After 5 days of differentiation, we observed a dramatic decrease in the number and the size of polynucleated cells, correlated with the reduced expression of myogenin and troponin (Fig. 4E).

To finally demonstrate the involvement of BHLHB2 and BHLHB3 in the effects of SREBP-1 on myoblasts, SREBP-1-overexpressing myoblasts were transfected with siRNA against GFP (control), BHLHB2, or BHLHB3, resulting in a partial gene extinction of BHLHB2 and BHLHB3 expression (Fig. 5A). As shown in Fig. 5B, inhibition of either BHLHB2 or BHLHB3 can restore, at least partially, the expression of MYOD1, MYOG, and MEF2C proteins that are downregulated upon SREBP-1 overexpression. Depletion of BHLHB2/B3 was sufficient to restore differentiation and myogenin and troponin expression in cells overexpressing SREBP-1 (Fig. 5C).

FIG. 5.

FIG. 5.

SREBP-1 inhibit human myoblasts differentiation through BHLHB2/B3 repressors. Human myoblasts were infected for 48 h with recombinant adenoviruses encoding SREBP-1a, or SREBP-1c, or GFP and cotransfected for 72 h with siRNA against BHLHB2 or BHLHB3 or both or with siRNA against GFP as control. Representative immunoblots of BHLHB2 and BHLHB3 (A) and MYOD1, MYOG, and MEF2C (B) in myoblasts transfected with siRNA against GFP (lanes 1) BHLHB2 (lanes 2) or BHLHB3 (lanes 3) and quantification of the protein levels (right panels). Coomassie blue (Coom) staining was used to normalize the total amount of proteins. The results are presented as means ± the SEM. *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.001 (n = 3). (C) Representative images of myoblasts overexpressing GFP, SREBP-1a, or SREBP-1c and transfected with siRNA against GFP (line 1), BHLHB2 (line 2), BHLHB3 (line 3), and both BHLHB2 and BHLHB3 (line 4) after 5 days of differentiation. Scale bar, 100 μm. Myogenin (MYOG, left) and troponin I1 (TNNI1, right) immunostaining (red), with DAPI staining (blue), was performed to assess the differentiation state.

Altogether, these data led us to propose that SREBP-1a and -1c block myoblast-to-myotube differentiation via an increase in BHLHB2 and BHLHB3 expression, the latter repressing the expression of muscle regulatory factors (MRFs).

SREBP-1a and -1c induce atrophy of differentiated myotubes.

We next examined the consequences of nuclear accumulation of SREBP-1 proteins in differentiated muscle cells. To confirm and expand the microarray data, we measured the expression levels of several transcription factors and sarcomeric protein genes using quantitative PCR in primary myotubes overexpressing the SREBP-1 factors for 48 h. Figure 6 shows that both SREBP-1a and -1c decreased the expression of myogenic regulatory factors (MYOD1, MYOG, and MEF2C) (Fig. 6A). A significant reduction in the mRNA levels of muscle contractile proteins (TTN, TNNI1, TNNI2, and MYL1) was also observed. These data were further confirmed at the protein level (Fig. 6B). Therefore, the mature forms of SREBP-1a and -1c clearly induced a dramatic decrease in the expression of major actors of skeletal muscle function, involved in either formation or contractility.

FIG. 6.

FIG. 6.

SREBP-1 induce human myotubes atrophy. Human myotubes were infected for 48 h with recombinant adenoviruses encoding GFP, SREBP-1a, or SREBP-1c. (A) mRNA levels of myogenic factors (MYOD1, MEF2C, and MYOG), sarcomeric proteins (MYL1, TNN, TNNI1, or TNNI2), and atrogenic factors (FOXO1, FBXO32, and MURF1) (n = 6 in each group). (B) Protein levels of SREBP1, MYOD1, MYOG, MEF2C, TNNI1, and TNNI2. Coomassie blue (Coom) staining was used to normalize the total amount of proteins (n = 4 in each group). (C) Representative images of myotubes overexpressing GFP, SREBP-1a, SREBP-1c, and ADD1-DN. Scale bar, 100 μm. The upper panels show phase contrast images; the lower panels show immunostaining with TNNI1 antibody (red) and DAPI staining (blue). (D) Measurement of the area of myotubes overexpressing GFP, SREBP-1a, and SREBP-1c stained with TNNI1 antibody (n = 3 in each group). The results are presented as mean ± the SEM. *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.001.

Direct observation of myotubes overexpressing SREBP-1 showed a decrease in cell surfaces. Troponin immunostaining confirmed a considerable reduction in sarcomeric protein content (Fig. 6C). Cell sizes measurements showed that SREBP-1 proteins induced an ∼6-fold decrease in cell surface (Fig. 6D). These observations indicated thus that nuclear accumulation of SREBP-1 led to myotube atrophy, with a severe decrease in the expression of muscle regulatory factors and sarcomeric proteins. To assess whether the observed SREBP1-induced atrophy involved known atrophic factors, we measured the mRNA levels of FBXO32 (Atrogin1), MURF1 (MuRF-1/TRIM63), and FOXO1. As shown in Fig. 6A, with the exception of MURF1, the expression of these factors was reduced in the presence of SREBP-1a and -1c. The upregulation of MURF1 mRNA, however, is in agreement with our previous microarray data (43).

As observed with SREBP-1a and -1c, infection of fully differentiated myotubes with adenoviruses expressing BHLHB2 or BHLHB3 strongly repressed the expression of myogenic factors (MYOD1, MYOG, and MEF2C) and sarcomeric proteins (MYL1, TNNI1, and TTN) (Fig. 7A). Overexpression of BHLHB2 and BHLHB3 also provoked the atrophy of muscle cells (Fig. 7B), as evidenced by cell size measurements indicating a >60% reduction in myotube areas (Fig. 7C). However, in contrast to SREBP-1, BHLHB2 and BHLHB3 overexpression induced a marked decrease in MURF1 expression level (Fig. 7A).

FIG. 7.

FIG. 7.

SREBP-1 induce myotubes atrophy through BHLHB2/B3 repressors. Human myotubes were infected for 48 h with recombinant adenoviruses encoding GFP, BHLHB2, or BHLHB3. (A) mRNA levels of myogenic factors (MYOD1, MEF2C, and MYOG), sarcomeric proteins (MYL1, TNN, and TNNI1), and atrogenic factors (FOXO1, FBXO32, and MURF1). (B) Representative images of myotubes overexpressing GFP, BHLHB2, and BHLHB3. The upper panels show phase-contrast results; the lower panels show immunostaining with TNNI1 antibody (red) and DAPI staining (blue). Scale bar, 100 μm. (C) Measurement of the area of myotubes overexpressing GFP, BHLHB2, or BHLHB3 immunostained with TNNI1 antibody (n = 3 in each group). The results are presented as means ± the SEM. *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.001. (D) Representative images of myotubes overexpressing GFP, SREBP-1a, or SREBP-1c and transfected with siRNA against GFP, BHLHB2, and BHLHB3 for 48 h. Scale bar, 100 μm. (E) Measurement of the area of myotubes overexpressing GFP, SREBP-1a, and SREBP-1c and transfected with siRNA against GFP, BHLHB2, or BHLHB3. Myotubes were stained with TNNI1 antibody (n = 3 in each group). The results are presented as means ± the SEM. *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.001.

To confirm the involvement of BHLHB2 and BHLHB3 in the atrophic effect of SREBP-1 on differentiated myotubes, SREBP-1 overexpressing myotubes were transfected with siRNA against GFP, BHLHB2, or BHLHB3. As shown in Fig. 7D, gene extinction of either BHLHB2 or BHLHB3 restored the expression of troponin. Depletion of BHLHB2/B3 also restored, at least partially, the size of myotubes, with a greater effect of BHLHB3 silencing (Fig. 7E).

Altogether, these data indicated that, as observed for inhibition of myoblast differentiation, the transcriptional repressors BHLHB2 and BHLHB3 are directly involved in the atrophy induced by SREBP-1 in differentiated myotubes.

SREBP-1a and -1c promote skeletal muscle atrophy in vivo.

To investigate the effects of SREBP-1 factors on muscle phenotype in vivo, we overexpressed SREBP-1a or SREBP-1c in limb muscle of mice using recombinant adenovirus. Adenoviruses expressing either GFP only, or both SREBP-1a and GFP (or SREBP-1c and GFP) were generated using dual expression properties of constructs containing an IRES element (26). Twelve-week-old BALB/c male mice were separated into two groups, and adenoviral suspensions were injected in tibialis anterior muscle with 1010 infectious units of recombinant adenoviruses expressing only GFP (Ad-GFP) in the left limb of all animals and either SREBP-1a and GFP (Ad-1a/GFP, first group) or SREBP-1c and GFP (Ad-1c/GFP, second group) in the right limb. Animals were sacrificed 7 days after injections, and tibialis anterior muscles were removed for analysis. When comparing the two groups, no differences were found in GFP-only expressing muscles of the left limbs (weight, fiber sizes, and fluorescence intensity); we thus considered the data concerning Ad-GFP-infected muscles as a unique set. As shown in Fig. 8A, tibialis anterior weight showed a significant decrease of 17.5% (SREBP-1a/GFP versus GFP, n = 7, P = 0.001) and 18.6% (SREBP-1c/GFP versus GFP, n = 7, P = 0.002) when expressing either of the SREBP-1 proteins. When we performed a similar experiment with intramuscular injection of recombinant adenoviruses overexpressing either BHLHB2 or BHLHB3, muscle weight showed a decrease of 17.1% (BHLHB2 versus GFP, n = 7, P = 0.001) and 24.8% (BHLHB3 versus GFP, n = 7, P = 0.001), respectively (Fig. 8A). We next examined fiber size in histological sections of treated muscles. Quantitative analysis revealed a significant decrease in average cross-sectional area (CSA) of myofibers for both SREBP-1a (mean ± the standard error of the mean [SEM] = 1,998.3 ± 19.7 μm2) and SREBP-1c (mean ± the SEM = 1,950.2 ± 21.0 μm2) compared to GFP (mean ± the SEM = 2,378.6 ± 21.7 μm2, P < 0.001 for both) (Fig. 8B). Size distribution of muscle fiber CSA was different between GFP-only and SREBP-1/GFP-expressing muscles, the latter presenting a marked displacement of distribution toward smaller sizes of fibers (Fig. 8C). Representative histological sections are shown in Fig. 8D with the expected mosaic pattern of fluorescence. Because of the dual expression strategy, fluorescence intensities in the muscle fibers of the right limbs reflect the level of expression of the SREBP-1 recombinant proteins. We therefore examined fiber CSA as a function of the fluorescence distribution (Fig. 8E). Although uninfected fibers (lowest fiber fluorescence category) showed similar myofiber CSA means, the reduction in mean fiber CSA of Ad-1a/GFP and Ad-1c/GFP-infected fibers increased with fluorescence intensity, reaching a maximum ca. 20% reduction of mean CSA compared to Ad-GFP-infected fibers.

FIG. 8.

FIG. 8.

In vivo overexpression of SREBP-1 leads to muscle atrophy. Tibialis anterior (TA) muscles of mice were injected with recombinant adenovirus Ad-GFP, Ad-SREBP-1a/GFP, Ad-SREBP-1c/GFP, Ad-BHLHB2, or Ad-BHLHB3. (A) TA weight 7 days after adenoviral infection (n = 7 in each group). (B) Mean CSA of TA fibers. (C) Distribution of mean CSA of TA muscle fibers (n = 4 in each group). (D) Representative images of TA sections, expressing GFP, or SREBP-1a and GFP, or SREBP-1c and GFP. DAPI staining (blue) and GFP fluorescence (green) are shown. Scale bar, 100 μm. (E) Distribution of CSA of TA muscle fibers as a function of myofiber fluorescence. The results are presented as means ± the SEM. **, P ≤ 0.001; ***, P ≤ 0.0001 (n = 4).

DISCUSSION

SREBP-1a and SREBP-1c are bHLH transcription factors first identified as adipocyte determination and differentiation factors (49). Their functions have been extensively studied in hepatocytes and in mouse liver. By activation of specific target genes involved in lipogenesis, SREBP-1 increase triglycerides synthesis, and to a lesser extent cholesterol synthesis (8, 20, 21, 47). SREBP-1c was also shown to mediate the action of insulin on the expression of lipogenic genes in liver (16). SREBP-1 proteins are also expressed in skeletal muscle (13, 38, 39) and in cultured muscle cells (12, 18). In the present study we identified a new role for these transcription factors and demonstrated that both SREBP-1a and SREBP-1c can block myoblast to myotube differentiation, and also induce myotube atrophy in vitro and in vivo.

The results of the present study also demonstrate that the transcriptional repressors BHLHB2 and BHLHB3 are SREBP-1 target genes and that they mediate the observed SREBP-1 action on human muscle cell. Both BHLHB2 and BHLHB3 have been involved in the regulation of differentiation and growth of several cell types. BHLHB2 promotes the differentiation of trophoblast stem cells to trophoblast giant cells (22), induces neuronal differentiation of pheochromocytoma P19 cell (7) and promotes chondrocyte differentiation of ATDC5 cells (46). BHLHB2 can also block adipocyte differentiation through direct transcriptional repression of PPARγ gene expression (53). Concerning muscle cells, BHLHB2 is expressed in embryonic and adult skeletal muscle cells and has been recently proposed as a possible regulator of satellite cell activation since BHLHB2 knockout mice exhibit increased cellular proliferation and degenerated myotubes during muscle regeneration process (48). BHLHB3 mRNA is expressed in proliferating C2C12 cells and is downregulated during myogenic differentiation (2). Moreover, its overexpression blocks myoblast-to-myotube differentiation in C2C12 cells, through either E-Box occupancy, direct interaction with MYOD1 protein, or both (3).

We have thus demonstrated that both BHLHB2 and BHLHB3 can inhibit muscle cell differentiation and induce myotube atrophy, reproducing the observed SREBP-1 effects in cultured muscle cells, notably a marked decrease in the expression of muscle specific transcription factors and sarcomeric proteins. Furthermore, silencing of BHLHB2 and BHLHB3 protein levels using siRNA fully restored the myogenic differentiation process in the presence of SREBP-1, and rescued, even if not completely, myotubes from atrophy induced by SREBP-1 overexpression. These data therefore establish a novel regulatory pathway of muscle cell differentiation implicating SREBP-1, BHLHB2, and BHLHB3. Interestingly, it is also known that the transcriptional repressors BHLHB2 and BHLHB3 can antagonize each other's effects (3, 32), and the scheme of this novel pathway can be completed with a negative-feedback loop that has recently been described in which both BHLHB2 and BHLHB3 inhibit SREBP-1c expression in a HIF-dependent mechanism (10).

Muscle differentiation is under the control of two families of transcription factors, named MRFs: the myogenic bHLH proteins (i.e., MYF5, MYOD1, MYOG, and MYF6), and the myocyte enhancer factor2 (MEF2) family of MADS domain-containing proteins (i.e., MEF2A, -2B, -2C, and -2D) (5, 40). Moreover, the myogenic bHLH factors interact with MEF2 proteins to cooperatively activate muscle specific genes (36). We have demonstrated here that nuclear accumulation of SREBP-1 proteins led to a coordinated inhibition of the expression of the MRF in myoblasts. This decrease, which results from BHLHB2/B2 transcriptional repressors activation, is sufficient to explain the blockade of differentiation. How BHLHB2/B3 repress the expression of MRF remains to be precisely examined, but this may occur through competitive binding to E-Box on MRF promoters. Moreover, a direct interaction of the transcriptional repressors with MRF proteins may participate in the inhibition of differentiation, as already demonstrated with BHLHB3 and MYOD1 in C2C12 cells (3).

Overexpression of SREBP-1 proteins, and also of BHLHB2/B3, induces both in vitro and in vivo myotube atrophy. The maintenance of muscle protein content results from intricately regulated anabolic and catabolic pathways. Examining genes regulated by both transcription factors reveals that MRFs and sarcomeric proteins are jointly downregulated, whereas only SREBP-1 induces MURF1, an actor in the proteolytic pathway. The ubiquitin proteasome system has been described as the main regulator of muscle atrophy (30), and the role of MURF1, FBXO32 (atrogin-1), and FOXO1 in this process has been recently reviewed (37). The marked reduction in sarcomeric protein, the induction of myotube atrophy, and the in vivo muscle wasting observed in the presence of SREBP-1 proteins could also have resulted from activation of this pathway. Since the reversion of atrophy by BHLHB2/B3 silencing is only partial, a specific action of SREBP-1 proteins on the ubiquitin proteasome system involving other effectors than BHLHB2/B3 might thus be considered. Nevertheless, a significant part of the atrophic effect is due to BHLHB2/B3 action, through inhibition of sarcomeric proteins expression. This decrease in protein synthesis may be due to a direct action of BHLHB2/B3 on contractile protein promoters or may also involve the decrease in MRF expression. MRFs are still expressed in differentiated myotubes (50) and participate in the expression of sarcomeric proteins (31). Whether MRFs are involved in the maintenance of the fully differentiated phenotype is still debated, but a combined decrease in MRF expression in differentiated myotubes may affect muscle protein synthesis and thus participate in the observed atrophy. Further studies are needed to characterize this atrophic process in terms of fiber type change, mitochondrial content, and oxidation capacity.

The control of the amount of SREBP-1 proteins in the nucleus involves regulation at several levels, including SREBP-1 gene expression, proteolytic cleavage in the endoplasmic reticulum, nuclear import, and activation/degradation within the nucleus (for a review, see reference 42). It has been recently demonstrated that SREBP-1 expression is enhanced through the PKB/mTOR pathway and could participate in the regulation of cell size through the control of lipid and cholesterol metabolism (41). The inflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor alpha, which is known to induce muscle atrophy (33), has been shown to increase SREBP-1 levels in hepatocytes (15). Growth factors such as insulin and IGF-1 are potent inducers of SREBP-1 expression in various cell types and tissues (1, 13, 38). In muscle, SREBP-1c nuclear content can be dramatically increased by insulin through activation of both the PI3K/PKB (38) and the MAPK (28, 38) pathways. Furthermore, the SREBP-1 proteins can control and enhance their own expression in human muscle cells (12). Due to the major and clearly demonstrated role of insulin, growth factors and the PI3K/PKB signaling pathway on muscle development and hypertrophy (23, 29), the atrophic effect of SREBP-1 proteins overexpression demonstrated in the present study likely represents a negative feedback loop to control muscle hypertrophy. In the same context, it is also interesting to notice that SREBP-1a and -1c enhance the expression of the p55 subunit of the PI3K (25, 43), which is regarded as a positive regulator of the PI3K/PKB pathway (17). The SREBP-1 proteins may thus regulate the hypertrophic effects of growth factors not only negatively through induction of the BHLHB2 and BHLHB3 repressors but also positively through the control of PI3K/PKB signaling pathway. Further investigations are required to study the impact of SREBP-1 on signaling pathways in skeletal muscle cells.

In summary, the data presented here identify a new role for the SREBP-1 transcription factors in the regulation of myogenesis and muscle tissue maintenance. Since SREBP-1a and -1c are master regulators of fatty acids and cholesterol synthesis, this new function can justify to consider them as integrators of signals coming from growth factors, inflammation, and nutritional status toward a control of muscle mass. It will therefore be of particular interest to further study these transcription factors in pathological situations inducing muscle wasting, but also in metabolic diseases where abnormalities in SREBP-1 have already been reported such as insulin-resistance and type 2 diabetes.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Programme National de Recherche sur le Diabète (grant to E.L.). V.L. is supported by a doctoral fellowship from the Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale.

We thank Annie Durand, Cyrille Debard, and Aurelie Granjon for technical assistance and E. R. Zabarowsky for the generous gift of the human genomic clone containing the BHLHB2 promoter region.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 22 December 2009.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Arito, M., T. Horiba, S. Hachimura, J. Inoue, and R. Sato. 2008. Growth factor-induced phosphorylation of sterol regulatory element-binding proteins inhibits sumoylation, thereby stimulating the expression of their target genes, low-density lipoprotein uptake, and lipid synthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 283:15224-15231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Azmi, S., A. Ozog, and R. Taneja. 2004. Sharp-1/DEC2 inhibits skeletal muscle differentiation through repression of myogenic transcription factors. J. Biol. Chem. 279:52643-52652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Azmi, S., H. Sun, A. Ozog, and R. Taneja. 2003. mSharp-1/DEC2, a basic helix-loop-helix protein functions as a transcriptional repressor of E box activity and Stra13 expression. J. Biol. Chem. 278:20098-20109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Azmi, S., and R. Taneja. 2002. Embryonic expression of mSharp-1/mDEC2, which encodes a basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor. Mech. Dev. 114:181-185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Black, B. L., and E. N. Olson. 1998. Transcriptional control of muscle development by myocyte enhancer factor-2 (MEF2) proteins. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 14:167-196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Boonsong, T., L. Norton, K. Chokkalingam, K. Jewell, I. Macdonald, A. Bennett, and K. Tsintzas. 2007. Effect of exercise and insulin on SREBP-1c expression in human skeletal muscle: potential roles for the ERK1/2 and Akt signalling pathways. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 35:1310-1311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Boudjelal, M., R. Taneja, S. Matsubara, P. Bouillet, P. Dolle, and P. Chambon. 1997. Overexpression of Stra13, a novel retinoic acid-inducible gene of the basic helix-loop-helix family, inhibits mesodermal and promotes neuronal differentiation of P19 cells. Genes Dev. 11:2052-2065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Brown, M. S., and J. L. Goldstein. 1997. The SREBP pathway: regulation of cholesterol metabolism by proteolysis of a membrane-bound transcription factor. Cell 89:331-340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chaussade, C., L. Pirola, S. Bonnafous, F. Blondeau, S. Brenz-Verca, H. Tronchere, F. Portis, S. Rusconi, B. Payrastre, J. Laporte, and E. Van Obberghen. 2003. Expression of myotubularin by an adenoviral vector demonstrates its function as a phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate [PtdIns(3)P] phosphatase in muscle cell lines: involvement of PtdIns(3)P in insulin-stimulated glucose transport. Mol. Endocrinol. 17:2448-2460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Choi, S. M., H. J. Cho, H. Cho, K. H. Kim, J. B. Kim, and H. Park. 2008. Stra13/DEC1 and DEC2 inhibit sterol regulatory element binding protein-1c in a hypoxia-inducible factor-dependent mechanism. Nucleic Acids Res. 36:6372-6385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cozzone, D., C. Debard, N. Dif, N. Ricard, E. Disse, J. Vouillarmet, R. Rabasa-Lhoret, M. Laville, D. Pruneau, J. Rieusset, E. Lefai, and H. Vidal. 2006. Activation of liver X receptors promotes lipid accumulation but does not alter insulin action in human skeletal muscle cells. Diabetologia 49:990-999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dif, N., V. Euthine, E. Gonnet, M. Laville, H. Vidal, and E. Lefai. 2006. Insulin activates human sterol-regulatory-element-binding protein-1c (SREBP-1c) promoter through SRE motifs. Biochem. J. 400:179-188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ducluzeau, P. H., N. Perretti, M. Laville, F. Andreelli, N. Vega, J. P. Riou, and H. Vidal. 2001. Regulation by insulin of gene expression in human skeletal muscle and adipose tissue: evidence for specific defects in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 50:1134-1142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Eberle, D., B. Hegarty, P. Bossard, P. Ferre, and F. Foufelle. 2004. SREBP transcription factors: master regulators of lipid homeostasis. Biochimie 86:839-848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Endo, M., T. Masaki, M. Seike, and H. Yoshimatsu. 2007. TNF-alpha induces hepatic steatosis in mice by enhancing gene expression of sterol regulatory element binding protein-1c (SREBP-1c). Exp. Biol. Med. 232:614-621. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Foretz, M., C. Guichard, P. Ferre, and F. Foufelle. 1999. Sterol regulatory element binding protein-1c is a major mediator of insulin action on the hepatic expression of glucokinase and lipogenesis-related genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96:12737-12742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fruman, D. A., F. Mauvais-Jarvis, D. A. Pollard, C. M. Yballe, D. Brazil, R. T. Bronson, C. R. Kahn, and L. C. Cantley. 2000. Hypoglycaemia, liver necrosis and perinatal death in mice lacking all isoforms of phosphoinositide 3-kinase p85 alpha. Nat. Genet. 26:379-382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Guillet-Deniau, I., V. Mieulet, S. Le Lay, Y. Achouri, D. Carre, J. Girard, F. Foufelle, and P. Ferre. 2002. Sterol regulatory element binding protein-1c expression and action in rat muscles: insulin-like effects on the control of glycolytic and lipogenic enzymes and UCP3 gene expression. Diabetes 51:1722-1728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Honma, S., T. Kawamoto, Y. Takagi, K. Fujimoto, F. Sato, M. Noshiro, Y. Kato, and K. Honma. 2002. Dec1 and Dec2 are regulators of the mammalian molecular clock. Nature 419:841-844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Horton, J. D., J. L. Goldstein, and M. S. Brown. 2002. SREBPs: activators of the complete program of cholesterol and fatty acid synthesis in the liver. J. Clin. Invest. 109:1125-1131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Horton, J. D., N. A. Shah, J. A. Warrington, N. N. Anderson, S. W. Park, M. S. Brown, and J. L. Goldstein. 2003. Combined analysis of oligonucleotide microarray data from transgenic and knockout mice identifies direct SREBP target genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100:12027-12032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hughes, M., N. Dobric, I. C. Scott, L. Su, M. Starovic, B. St-Pierre, S. E. Egan, J. C. Kingdom, and J. C. Cross. 2004. The Hand1, Stra13 and Gcm1 transcription factors override FGF signaling to promote terminal differentiation of trophoblast stem cells. Dev. Biol. 271:26-37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Izumiya, Y., T. Hopkins, C. Morris, K. Sato, L. Zeng, J. Viereck, J. A. Hamilton, N. Ouchi, N. K. LeBrasseur, and K. Walsh. 2008. Fast/glycolytic muscle fiber growth reduces fat mass and improves metabolic parameters in obese mice. Cell Metab. 7:159-172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Janatpour, M. J., M. F. Utset, J. C. Cross, J. Rossant, J. Dong, M. A. Israel, and S. J. Fisher. 1999. A repertoire of differentially expressed transcription factors that offers insight into mechanisms of human cytotrophoblast differentiation. Dev. Genet. 25:146-157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kallin, A., L. E. Johannessen, P. D. Cani, C. Y. Marbehant, A. Essaghir, F. Foufelle, P. Ferre, C. H. Heldin, N. M. Delzenne, and J. B. Demoulin. 2007. SREBP-1 regulates the expression of heme oxygenase 1 and the phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase regulatory subunit p55 gamma. J. Lipid Res. 48:1628-1636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kim, D. G., H. M. Kang, S. K. Jang, and H. S. Shin. 1992. Construction of a bifunctional mRNA in the mouse by using the internal ribosomal entry site of the encephalomyocarditis virus. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12:3636-3643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kim, J. B., and B. M. Spiegelman. 1996. ADD1/SREBP1 promotes adipocyte differentiation and gene expression linked to fatty acid metabolism. Genes Dev. 10:1096-1107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kotzka, J., D. Muller-Wieland, G. Roth, L. Kremer, M. Munck, S. Schurmann, B. Knebel, and W. Krone. 2000. Sterol regulatory element binding proteins (SREBP)-1a and SREBP-2 are linked to the MAP-kinase cascade. J. Lipid Res. 41:99-108. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lai, K. M., M. Gonzalez, W. T. Poueymirou, W. O. Kline, E. Na, E. Zlotchenko, T. N. Stitt, A. N. Economides, G. D. Yancopoulos, and D. J. Glass. 2004. Conditional activation of akt in adult skeletal muscle induces rapid hypertrophy. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:9295-9304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lecker, S. H., V. Solomon, W. E. Mitch, and A. L. Goldberg. 1999. Muscle protein breakdown and the critical role of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway in normal and disease states. J. Nutr. 129:227S-237S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Li, H., and Y. Capetanaki. 1993. Regulation of the mouse desmin gene: transactivated by MyoD, myogenin, MRF4 and Myf5. Nucleic Acids Res. 21:335-343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Li, Y., M. Xie, X. Song, S. Gragen, K. Sachdeva, Y. Wan, and B. Yan. 2003. DEC1 negatively regulates the expression of DEC2 through binding to the E-box in the proximal promoter. J. Biol. Chem. 278:16899-16907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Li, Y. P., and M. B. Reid. 2000. NF-κB mediates the protein loss induced by TNF-alpha in differentiated skeletal muscle myotubes. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 279:R1165-R1170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.MacLean, H. E., and H. M. Kronenberg. 2004. Expression of Stra13 during mouse endochondral bone development. Gene Expr. Patterns 4:633-636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Miyazaki, K., T. Kawamoto, K. Tanimoto, M. Nishiyama, H. Honda, and Y. Kato. 2002. Identification of functional hypoxia response elements in the promoter region of the DEC1 and DEC2 genes. J. Biol. Chem. 277:47014-47021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Molkentin, J. D., B. L. Black, J. F. Martin, and E. N. Olson. 1995. Cooperative activation of muscle gene expression by MEF2 and myogenic bHLH proteins. Cell 83:1125-1136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Murton, A. J., D. Constantin, and P. L. Greenhaff. 2008. The involvement of the ubiquitin proteasome system in human skeletal muscle remodeling and atrophy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1782:730-743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Nadeau, K. J., J. W. Leitner, I. Gurerich, and B. Draznin. 2004. Insulin regulation of sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1 expression in L-6 muscle cells and 3T3 L1 adipocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 279:34380-34387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Osborne, T. F. 2000. Sterol regulatory element-binding proteins (SREBPs): key regulators of nutritional homeostasis and insulin action. J. Biol. Chem. 275:32379-32382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Parker, M. H., P. Seale, and M. A. Rudnicki. 2003. Looking back to the embryo: defining transcriptional networks in adult myogenesis. Nat. Rev. Genet. 4:497-507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Porstmann, T., C. R. Santos, B. Griffiths, M. Cully, M. Wu, S. Leevers, J. R. Griffiths, Y. L. Chung, and A. Schulze. 2008. SREBP activity is regulated by mTORC1 and contributes to Akt-dependent cell growth. Cell Metab. 8:224-236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Raghow, R., C. Yellaturu, X. Deng, E. A. Park, and M. B. Elam. 2008. SREBPs: the crossroads of physiological and pathological lipid homeostasis. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 19:65-73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Rome, S., V. Lecomte, E. Meugnier, J. Rieusset, C. Debard, V. Euthine, H. Vidal, and E. Lefai. 2008. Microarray analyses of SREBP-1a and SREBP-1c target genes identify new regulatory pathways in muscle. Physiol. Genomics 34:327-337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Rossner, M. J., J. Dorr, P. Gass, M. H. Schwab, and K. A. Nave. 1997. SHARPs: mammalian enhancer-of-split- and hairy-related proteins coupled to neuronal stimulation. Mol. Cell Neurosci. 9:460-475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Sapru, M. K., K. M. McCormick, and B. Thimmapaya. 2002. High-efficiency adenovirus-mediated in vivo gene transfer into neonatal and adult rodent skeletal muscle. J. Neurosci. Methods 114:99-106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Shen, M., E. Yoshida, W. Yan, T. Kawamoto, K. Suardita, Y. Koyano, K. Fujimoto, M. Noshiro, and Y. Kato. 2002. Basic helix-loop-helix protein DEC1 promotes chondrocyte differentiation at the early and terminal stages. J. Biol. Chem. 277:50112-50120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Shimano, H., J. D. Horton, R. E. Hammer, I. Shimomura, M. S. Brown, and J. L. Goldstein. 1996. Overproduction of cholesterol and fatty acids causes massive liver enlargement in transgenic mice expressing truncated SREBP-1a. J. Clin. Invest. 98:1575-1584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Sun, H., L. Li, C. Vercherat, N. T. Gulbagci, S. Acharjee, J. Li, T. K. Chung, T. H. Thin, and R. Taneja. 2007. Stra13 regulates satellite cell activation by antagonizing Notch signaling. J. Cell Biol. 177:647-657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Tontonoz, P., J. B. Kim, R. A. Graves, and B. M. Spiegelman. 1993. ADD1: a novel helix-loop-helix transcription factor associated with adipocyte determination and differentiation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13:4753-4759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Walters, E. H., N. C. Stickland, and P. T. Loughna. 2000. The expression of the myogenic regulatory factors in denervated and normal muscles of different phenotypes. J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil. 21:647-653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Yamada, K., and K. Miyamoto. 2005. Basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors, BHLHB2 and BHLHB3; their gene expressions are regulated by multiple extracellular stimuli. Front. Biosci. 10:3151-3171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Yokoyama, C., X. Wang, M. R. Briggs, A. Admon, J. Wu, X. Hua, J. L. Goldstein, and M. S. Brown. 1993. SREBP-1, a basic-helix-loop-helix-leucine zipper protein that controls transcription of the low density lipoprotein receptor gene. Cell 75:187-197. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Yun, Z., H. L. Maecker, R. S. Johnson, and A. J. Giaccia. 2002. Inhibition of PPAR gamma 2 gene expression by the HIF-1-regulated gene DEC1/Stra13: a mechanism for regulation of adipogenesis by hypoxia. Dev. Cell 2:331-341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES