Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jan 15.
Published in final edited form as: Bioorg Med Chem. 2009 Dec 2;18(2):803. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2009.11.049

Antitumor Agents 270. Novel Substituted 6-Phenyl-4H-furo[3,2-c]pyran-4-one Derivatives as Potent and Highly Selective Anti-Breast Cancer Agents

Yizhou Dong a, Qian Shi a,*, Kyoko Nakagawa-Goto a, Pei-Chi Wu a, Susan L Morris-Natschke a, Arnold Brossi a, Kenneth F Bastow b,*, Jing-Yu Lang c, Mien-Chie Hung c,d, Kuo-Hsiung Lee a,*
PMCID: PMC2821697  NIHMSID: NIHMS162671  PMID: 20034799

Abstract

6-Phenyl-4H-furo[3,2-c]pyran-4-one derivatives based on neo-tashinlactone (1) were synthesized and evaluated as novel anti-breast cancer agents. Compounds 10-13, 23, 25, and 27 showed potent inhibition against the SK-BR-3 breast cancer cell line. Importantly, 25 and 27 showed the highest cancer cell line selectivity, being approximately 100- to 250-fold more potent against SK-BR-3 (ED50 0.28 and 0.44 μM, respectively) compared with other cancer cell lines tested. In addition, 25 displayed low cytotoxicity against normal breast cell lines 184A1 and MCF10A. Compounds 25 and 27 merit further investigation in our continuing program to generate and develop selective anti-breast cancer agents.

Introduction

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women.1-3 According to the American Cancer Society, the disease accounts for more than one quarter of cancers diagnosed in US women. In 2007, it was estimated that 18,000 new cases of invasive breast cancer would be diagnosed in women, as well as an estimated 60,000 additional cases of in situ breast cancer.4

Most clinically used anticancer drugs cause general toxicity to proliferating cells, which can severely limit the therapeutic value of these drugs.5 Thus, much effort has been made to increase tissue, cell, and target selectivity for chemotherapy.6-8 However, although new cytotoxic agents with unique mechanisms of action have been developed continuously, many of them have not been therapeutically useful due to low tumor selectivity.5 These facts prompted us to design and develop novel potent and selective anti-breast cancer agents.

Natural products have been the most important source of new medicinal leads. 9-11 However, the structural complexity of natural products, such as intricate ring systems and numerous chiral centers, may lead to limited supplies and hamper mechanism of action studies and clinical development.12 For this reason, structural simplification of natural products is a powerful and highly productive tool for lead development and analog design.13 A well-known example is the simplification of morphine, which led to the clinically used medicines levophanol and meperidine.14 Neo-tanshinlactone (1) is a steroid-like tetracyclic natural product originally isolated from the traditional Chinese medicine Tanshen. Compound 1 and its first generation analog 2 with various substituents around the molecular scaffold were totally synthesized and previously studied for biological activity. Compound 1 was reported as a highly selective inhibitor of the growth of breast cancer cell lines SK-BR-3 (HER2 over-expressing breast cancer) and ZR-75-1 (estrogen receptor positive breast cancer).2, 15 Although previous studies provided much information about the structure-activity relationships, several questions remained unanswered: how does the skeletal planarity affect activity and selectivity, how do each of the four individual rings contribute to activity, and how will the activity and selectivity change by simplification of the tetracyclic molecule of 1. We used chemical and biological strategies to investigate structurally simplified 1-analogs to answer these questions.

In our prior paper, we reported a study on how the individual A, C, and D rings influence in vitro anti-breast cancer activity.16 The results revealed that 2-(furan-2-yl)-naphthalen-1-ol derivatives (e.g., 3), in which ring-C of 1 is missing, are a new class of potent and selective anti-breast cancer agents. These results encouraged us to further simplify the scaffold of 1. Herein, we report a new chemical entity, substituted 6-phenyl-4H-furo[3,2-c]pyran-4-one derivatives (4), the synthesis of these 4-analogs, and their cytotoxic activity against a human tumor cell line panel.

Chemistry

All target compounds 9-30 were synthesized through a three to five-step sequence (Scheme 1). Various substituted esters 5 were reacted with a dianion intermediate generated from ethyl acetoacetate with LDA and TMEDA to give triketoesters 6 as tautomeric mixtures. Pyrones 7 were prepared by heating 6 in a 170 °C oil bath under reduced pressure. The resulting yellow solid was isolated by vacuum filtration, and the compound used directly in the next step.17 Target compounds 9-11, 14-17, 19, 21-22, 24-25, and 27-29 were obtained via a tandem alkylation/intramolecular Aldol reaction of 7.18 Removal of the methyl group in 11, 17, 19, 22, and 25 by BBr3 gave 13, 18, 20, 23, and 26. Compound 12 was obtained by treatment of 13 with iodoethane under basic conditions (Scheme 1). Compound 25 was reacted with Lawesson's reagent to afford 30.19

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Results and Discussion

Together with 1, the newly synthesized 6-phenyl-4H-furo[3,2-c]pyran-4-one analogs 930 were evaluated for in vitro anti-breast cancer activity against the SK-BR-3 human tumor cell line. Results from 927 (Table 1) showed that different substituents around the phenyl ring were critical to the potency and selectivity. Modifications in the furopyranone ring system were also explored with 2830 (Table 1). Selected active compounds with ED50 values less than 10 μM against SK-BR-3 were further examined against ZR-7-51, MDA-MB-231 (estrogen receptor negative breast cancer), A549 (human lung cancer), DU145 (prostate cancer), KB (nasopharyngeal carcinoma), and KB-vin (vincristine resistant KB subline) cancer cell lines (Table 2).

Table 1.

Cytotoxicity of 9-27 Against SK-BR-3 Tumor Cell Linea

graphic file with name nihms-162671-f0001.jpg
Compd R1 R2 R3 R4 SK-BR-3
1 - - - - 0.95±0.01
9 H H H H 15.49±0.60
10 H Me H H 1.50±0.04
11 H OMe H H 2.58±0.15
12 H OEt H H 0.67±0.03
13 H OH H H 1.61±0.09
14 H F H H 20.49±1.50
15 H H F H 19.26±0.65
16 H H Me H >83.3
17 H H OMe H >78.1
18 H H OH H 35.95±1.50
19 OMe OMe H H 65.03±2.50
20 OH OH H H 34.11±1.15
21 H Me Me H 14.57±0.63
22 H OMe OMe H >69.9
23 H OH OH H 0.47±0.01
24 H Me H Me 22.44±0.95
25 H OMe H OMe 0.28±0.01
26 H OH H OH 38.37±0.95
27 H OMe OMe OMe 0.44±0.01
28 -- -- -- -- 55.57±1.65
29 -- -- -- -- >66.7
30 -- -- -- -- >66.2
a

mean ED50+SEM (μM), from 2 or more independent tests.

Table 2.

Cytotoxicity of Selected Compounds against Tumor Cell Line Panela

Compd ZR-75-1 MDA-MB-231 A549 DU145 KB KBvin
1 0.9±0.02 37.9±1.4 54.2±3.4 58.3±2.0 >37.9 >75.8
10 6.3±0.4 >83.3 53.8±0.8 24.6±1.5 43.8±1.3 40.0±1.1
11 5.5±0.2 >39.1 58.2±1.7 >78.1 >78.1 71.1 ±2.1
12 2.2±0.06 >37.0 57.8±3.7 74.1±5.6 64.4±3.0 >74.1
13 0.9±0.03 >41.3 68.6±2.9 82.6±3.4 65.3±0.9 60.3±2.9
23 1.2±0.07 22.9±0.65 19.4±0.71 25.6±1.2 20.2±0.5 23.3±0.39
25 30.8±1.7 >69.9 >69.9 65.4±3.1 >69.9 >69.9
27 29.1±0.8 >31.6 63.3±2.7 >63.3 >63.3 >63.3
a

mean ED50+SEM (μM), from 2 or more independent tests.

Structurally, both 1 and 10 have a methyl substituent at corresponding positions on their phenyl rings. Thus, the two compounds are identical, except that 10 has no ring-B. Interestingly, 10 showed potent activity with an ED50 value of 1.50 μM, which is slightly less active than 1. The unsubstituted analog 9 was less potent than either 1 or 10. Addition of methyl (10), methoxy (11), ethoxy (12), and hydroxyl (13) at the R2-position of the phenyl ring increased activity against the SK-BR-3 cell line, compared with 9. The rank order of potency of the five compounds was 12 > 13 > 11 > 10 > 9. Compound 12, with a R2-ethoxyphenyl ring, displayed slightly greater activity (ED50 0.67 μM) than 1. In contrast, fluorine at the R2-position (14), as well as R3-position (15), led to somewhat decreased potency compared with the unsubstituted analog 9. Addition of methyl, methoxy, or hydroxyl at the phenyl R3-position (16-18) reduced potency significantly. Compounds 19-26 and 27 are di- and tri-substituted derivatives, respectively, with one substituent always present at the phenyl R2-position. Neither R1, R2-disubstituted compound (19, 20) showed significant activity, leading us to speculate that a substituent in the R1-position may have a steric effect on the orientation of the lactone ring and reduce the ligand-receptor interaction. Analogs with the same substituent at both the R2- and R3-positions showed increased potency relative to the corresponding R3-monosubstituted analog (16 vs 21, 17 vs 22, 18 vs 23). Thus, alkyl, alkoxy, and hydroxy groups are favored at R2-position, while they are not favored at the R3-position. Comparison of 25 with 24 and 26 indicated that a methoxy group is favored at R4-position, while methyl and hydroxy groups are not. Furthermore, the R2, R3, R4-trimethoxy (27) and R2, R4-dimethoxy (25) analogs showed dramatically enhanced potency compared with the 3’-methoxy compound (11), while the R2, R3-dimethoxy (22) and R1, R2-dimethoxy (19) analogs showed decreased potency. In fact, the R2, R4-dimethoxy analog 25 (ED50 0.28 μM) was the most active analog among the 19 substituted phenyl A-ring analogs (927). It was also approximately threefold more potent than 1.

We also investigated the cytotoxic activity of 28-30, which have a modified ring-C or -D, as shown in Table 1. Insertion of an ethyl (28) or two methyl (29) groups rather than a single methyl group on the furan, as well as bioisosteric replacement of sulfur (thiolactone 30) for oxygen in the lactone carbonyl led to greatly reduced or no anti-breast cancer activity (Table 1). More SAR studies of ring-C and –D are in progress and will be reported in a future publication.

To examine the human tumor-tissue-type selectivity, active compounds 10-13, 23, 25, and 27 were tested against a limited but diverse panel of human cancer cell lines, using 1 as a positive control (Table 2). Compounds 10-13 and 23 displayed similar inhibition of the ZR-75-1 and SKBR-3 cell lines. Interestingly, 25 and 27 showed very weak activity against ZR-75-1. Except for 23, all lead compounds had weak activity or no activity against MDA-MB-231 breast cancer or the remaining four cancer cell lines tested, which suggested high tumor-tissue-type selectivity. Furthermore, 23 showed only moderate inhibition. Importantly, 25 and 27 showed unique selectivity against the SK-BR-3 breast cancer cell line (HER2+), with approximately 100-250 fold differences compared with the other cancer cell lines tested. The unique selectivity of these novel lead compounds could be exploited to develop novel anti-breast cancer trials candidates and explore the mechanism(s) of action.

Compound 25 was tested independently against cell lines derived from normal breast tissue (MCF10A and 184A1) versus SK-BR-3 as a positive breast cancer cell line control, and results are shown in Figure 2. The interpolated ED50 values were 1.0, 16.8 and >35.0 μM against SK-BR-3, 184A1, and MCF10A cells, respectively, showing that 25 is selective for a sub-set of breast cancer-derived cell lines and is significantly less active against normal breast-derived tissue.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Selective in vitro anticancer activity of 25 against SK-BR-3 breast cancer versus normal breast tissue-derived cell lines (MCF10A and 184A1). Legend: Cell line description, source and activity determination using the MTT-dye assay are described in the experimental section. Graphical data are the mean and standard deviation of values obtained from replicates in a single experiment.

Conclusions

In conclusion, this study discovered a novel class of promising anti-breast cancer agents, substituted 6-phenyl-4H-furo[3,2-c]pyran-4-one derivatives. The ED50 values of the two most potent analogs (25 and 27) against SK-BR-3 were 0.28 and 0.44 μM, respectively. More importantly, 25 and 27 showed extremely high cancer cell line selectivity, being approximately 100- to 250-fold more potent against SK-BR-3 compared with six additional tested cancer cell lines. Furthermore, 25 displayed much greater potency against the SK-BR-3 breast cancer cell line compared with normal breast cell lines 184A1 and MCF10A. Preliminary SAR studies led to the following observations. (1) R2-Methyl, methoxy, ethoxy, and hydroxy groups, but not a R2-fluoro group, could increase potency. (2) Among disubstituted phenyl compounds, R1-, R3-, or R4-methyl groups, R1- or R3-methoxy groups, and R4-hydroxy groups decreased potency; while a R3-hydroxy or R4-methoxy group increased potency. (3) Current modifications in ring-C and -D were not preferred. The SAR profile established from the current study is different from that with the neo-tanshinlactone series, which is a four-ring system. Thus, skeletal planarity is not indispensable for the entire molecule, though it may be important to some extent. Focused studies will continue to develop promising novel analogs as clinical trials candidates for anti-breast cancer treatment.

Experimental Section

Materials and Methods

Melting points were measured with a Fisher Johns melting apparatus without correction. 1H NMR spectra were measured on a 300 MHz Varian Gemini 2000 spectrometer using TMS as internal standard. The solvent used was CDCl3 unless indicated. Mass spectra were measured on a Shimadzu LC-MS2010 instrument. Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) and preparative TLC were performed on precoated silica gel GF plates purchased from Merck, Inc. Biotage Flash+ or Isco Companion systems were used for flash chromatography. Silica gel (200-400 mesh) from Aldrich, Inc. was used for column chromatography. All other chemicals were obtained from Aldrich, Inc. and Fisher, Inc. Preparation of intermediates 6 and 7 were reported by Douglas, etc.17

Cell Growth Inhibition Assay

All stock cultures are grown in T-25 flasks. Freshly trypsinized cell suspensions were seeded in 96-well microtiter plates with compounds added from DMSO-diluted stock. The plates were incubated for an additional 72 h after attachment and drug addition, and the assay was terminated by 10% TCA. Then, 0.4% SRB dye in 1% HOAc was added to stain the cells for 10 minutes. Unbound dye was removed by repeated washing with 1% HOAc and the plates were air dried. Bound stain was subsequently solved with 10 mM trizma base, and the absorbance read at 515 nm. Growth inhibition of 50% (ED50) is calculated as the drug concentration, which caused a 50% reduction in the net protein increase during the drug incubation. The mean ED50 is the concentration of agent that reduces cell growth by 50% under the experimental conditions and is the average with SEM from at least two independent determinations. Variation between replicates was no more than 5% of the mean. The following human tumor cell lines were used in the assay: A549 (non small cell lung cancer, ZR-75-1 (estrogen receptor positive breast cancer), MDA MB-231 (estrogen receptor negative breast cancer), SK-BR-3 (HER2 over-expressing breast cancer), KB (nasopharyngeal carcinoma), KB-VIN (vincristine-resistant KB subline). All cell lines were obtained from the Lineberger Cancer Center (UNC-CH) or from ATCC (Rockville, MD). Cells propagated in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% FBS, penicillin (100 IU/mL), streptomycin (1 μg/mL), and amphotericin B (0.25 μg/mL), and were cultured at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air/5% CO2.

General preparation of 9-11, 14-17, 19, 21-22, 24-25, 27-29

To a solution of 7 (1.04 mmol) in toluene (9 mL) was added a mixture of HOAc (0.30 ml, 5.20 mmol) and NH4OAc (400 mg, 5.20 mmol) in EtOH (3 mL) and chloroacetone (0.42 mL, 5.20 mmol). The mixture was stirred for 30 min at rt, and then heated to 60 °C for 30 min. Subsequently, it was refluxed for 24 h. After cooling, the mixture was diluted with H2O and extracted with EtOAc. The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and evaporated in vacuo. The residue was purified by column chromatography to give a solid.

3-Methyl-6-phenyl-4 H-furo[3,2-c]pyran-4-one (9)

50% yield; mp 105-107 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): δ 2.33 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 3H, CH3), 7.00 (s, 1H, OCH), 7.28-7.29 (m, 1H, C7-H), 7.43-7.46 (m, 3H, aromatic), 7.83-7.87 (m, 2H, aromatic); HRMS for (M++H): calcd. 227.0708, found: 227.0696.

3-Methyl-6-m-tolyl-4H-furo[3,2-c]pyran-4-one (10)

52% yield; mp 135-137 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): δ 2.33 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 3H, CH3), 2.42 (s, 3H, CH3), 6.99 (s, 1H, C7-H), 7.23-7.36 (m, 3H, aromatic), 7.62 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H, aromatic), 7.69 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H, OCH); HRMS for (M++H): calcd. 241.0865, found: 241.0851.

6-(3-Methoxyphenyl)-3-methyl-4H-furo[3,2-c]pyran-4-one (11)

44% yield; mp 119-121 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): δ 2.34 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 3H, CH3), 3.87 (s, 3H, OCH3), 6.96-7.00 (m, 2H), 7.29-7.44 (m, 4H); 13 C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): δ 8.52, 55.47, 93.64, 109.91, 110.68, 116.36, 117.82, 119.55, 129.91, 133.07, 140.76, 157.71, 159.39, 160.01, 161.93; HRMS for (M++H): calcd. 257.0814, found: 257.0800.

6-(3-Fluorophenyl)-3-methyl-4H-furo[3,2-c]pyran-4-one (14)

34%yield; mp 158-160 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): δ 2.34 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 3H, CH3), 7.01 (s, 1H, C7-H), 7.10-7.17 (m, 1H, aromatic), 7.31 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 1H, OCH), 7.39-7.46 (m, 1H, aromatic), 7.54-7.58 (m, 1H, aromatic), 7.61-7.65 (m, 1H, aromatic); HRMS for (M++H): calcd. 245.0614, found: 245.0603.

6-(4-Fluorophenyl)-3-methyl-4H-furo[3,2-c]pyran-4-one (15)

52% yield; mp 175-177 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): δ 2.34 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 3H, CH3), 6.94 (s, 1H, C7-H), 7.12-7.18 (m, 2H, aromatic), 7.29 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 1H, OCH), 7.82-7.87 (m, 2H, aromatic); HRMS for (M++H): calcd. 245.0614, found: 245.0603.

3-Methyl-6-p-tolyl-4H-furo[3,2-c]pyran-4-one (16)

62% yield; mp 153-155 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): δ 2.33 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 3H, CH3), 2.40 (s, 3H, CH3), 6.95 (s, 1H, C7-H), 7.24-7.27 (m, 3H, aromatic & OCH), 7.74 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H, aromatic); HRMS for ([M+H]+): calcd. 241.0865, found: 241.0848.

6-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-3-methyl-4H-furo[3,2-c]pyran-4-one (17)

60% yield; mp 146-148 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): δ 2.33 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 3H, CH3), 3.87 (s, 3H, OCH3), 6.88 (s, 1H, C7-H), 6.97 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H, aromatic), 7.26 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H, OCH), 7.80 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H, aromatic); HRMS for ([M+H]+): calcd. 257.0808, found: 257.0816.

6-(2,3-Dimethoxyphenyl)-3-methyl-4H-furo[3,2-c]pyran-4-one (19)

40% yield; mp 111-113 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): δ 2.34 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 3H, CH3), 3.87 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.92 (s, 3H, OCH3), 7.00 (dd, J = 1.2, 8.1 Hz, 1H, aromatic), 7.16 (t, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, aromatic), 7.34 (q, J = 1.2 Hz, 1H, OCH), 7.48 (s, 1H, C7-H), 7.54 (dd, J = 1.2, 8.1 Hz, 1H, aromatic); HRMS for (M++H): calcd. 287.0919, found: 287.0906.

6-(3,4-Dimethylphenyl)-3-methyl-4H-furo[3,2-c]pyran-4-one (21)

67% yield; mp 182-184 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): δ 2.30 (s, 3H, CH3) 2.32 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.33 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 3H, CH3), 6.95 (s, 1H, C7-H), 7.20 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, aromatic), 7.26 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 1H, OCH), 7.57 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, aromatic), 7.64 (s, 1H, aromatic); HRMS for ([M+H]+): calcd. 255.1016, found: 255.1010.

6-(3,4-Dimethoxyphenyl)-3-methyl-4H-furo[3,2-c]pyran-4-one (22)

83% yield; mp 154-156 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): δ 2.33 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 3H, CH3), 3.94 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.98 (s, 3H, OCH3), 6.90 (s, 1H, C7-H), 6.92 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H, aromatic), 7.27 (t, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H, OCH), 7.34 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H, aromatic), 7.43 (dd, J = 2.1, 8.4 Hz, 1H, aromatic); HRMS for (M++H): calcd. 287.0919, found: 287.0900.

6-(3,5-Dimethylphenyl)-3-methyl-4H-furo[3,2-c]pyran-4-one (24)

30% yield; mp 171-173 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): δ 2.33 (d, J = 0.9 Hz, 3H, CH3), 2.37 (s, 6H, CH3), 6.98 (s, 1H, C7-H), 7.07 (s, 1H, aromatic), 7.28 (d, J = 0.9 Hz, 1H, OCH), 7.48 (s, 2H, aromatic); HRMS for (M++H): calcd. 255.1021, found: 255.1010.

6-(3,5-Dimethoxyphenyl)-3-methyl-4H-furo[3,2-c]pyran-4-one (25)

38%, yield; mp 153-155 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): δ 2.34 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 3H, CH3), 3.86 (s, 6H, OCH3), 6.54 (t, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H, C7-H), 6.98 (s, 1H, aromatic), 6.99 (d, J = 2.7 Hz, 2H, aromatic), 7.30 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H, OCH); HRMS for (M++H): calcd. 287.0919, found: 287.0898.

3-Methyl-6-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)-4H-furo[3,2-c]pyran-4-one (27)

40% yield; mp 201-203 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): δ 2.34 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 3H, CH3), 3.91 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.95 (s, 6H, OCH3), 6.94 (s, 1H, C7-H), 7.06 (s, 2H, aromatic), 7.29 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 1H, OCH); HRMS for (M++H): calcd. 317.1025, found: 317.1037.

6-(3,5-Dimethoxyphenyl)-3-ethyl-4H-furo[3,2-c]pyran-4-one (28)

51% yield; mp 131-133 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): δ 1.31 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H, CH2CH3), 2.77 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, CH2CH3), 3.86 (s, 6H, OCH3), 6.54 (t, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H, C7-H), 6.98 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 3H, aromatic), 7.30 (t, J = 1.2 Hz, 1H, OCH); HRMS for (M++H): calcd. 301.1076, found: 301.1057.

6-(3,5-Dimethoxyphenyl)-2,3-dimethyl-4H-furo[3,2-c]pyran-4-one (29)

12% yield; mp 163-165 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): δ 2.25 (d, J = 0.6 Hz, 3H, CH3), 2.33 (d, J = 0.6 Hz, 3H, CH3), 3.86 (s, 6H, OCH3), 6.53 (t, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H, aromatic), 6.93 (s, 1H, OCH), 6.97 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 2H, aromatic); HRMS for ([M+H]+): calcd. 301.1071, found: 301.1067.

General preparation of 13, 20, 23, and 26

To a solution of 13, 20, 23, or 26 (0.2 mmol) in DCM (3 ml) was added BBr3 (0.6 ml, 0.6 mmol) dropwise at 0 °C. The reaction mixture was stirred overnight. Water was added to quench the reaction. The solution was extracted with CHCl3 and concentrated. The residue was purified by column chromatography to give a white solid.

6-(3-Hydroxyphenyl)-3-methyl-4H-furo[3,2-c]pyran-4-one (13)

78% yield; mp 225-227 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD, ppm): δ 2.29 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 3H, CH3), 6.86-6.90 (m, 1H, C7-H), 7.26-7.31 (m, 3H, aromatic & OCH), 7.35-7.39 (m, 1H, aromatic), 7.52 (dd, J = 1.2, 2.7 Hz, 1H, aromatic); HRMS for (M++H): calcd. 243.0657, found: 243.0659.

6-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)-3-methyl-4H-furo[3,2-c]pyran-4-one (18)

80% yield; mp 258-260 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD, ppm): δ 2.27 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 3H, CH3), 6.86 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H, aromatic) 7.18 (s, 1H, C7-H), 7.46 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 1H, OCH), 7.75 (d, J = 9.3 Hz, 2H, aromatic); HRMS for ([M+H]+): calcd. 243.0657, found: 243.0641.

6-(2,3-Dihydroxyphenyl)-3-methyl-4H-furo[3,2-c]pyran-4-one (20)

66% yield; mp 239-241 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD, ppm): δ 2.28 (d, J = 0.9 Hz, 3H, CH3), 6.76 (t, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H, aromatic), 6.86 (dd, J = 1.5, 1.8 Hz, 1H, aromatic), 7.38 (dd, J = 1.2, 1.5 Hz, 1H, aromatic), 7.48 (q, J = 1.2 Hz, 1H, OCH), 7.75 (s, 1H, C7-H); HRMS for (M++H): calcd. 259.0606, found: 259.0602.

6-(3,4-Dihydroxyphenyl)-3-methyl-4H-furo[3,2-c]pyran-4-one (23)

60% yield; mp 259-261 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD, ppm): δ 2.69 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 3H, CH3), 6.83 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 3H, C7-H), 7.12 (s, 1H, aromatic), 7.26-7.31 (m, 2H, aromatic), 7.46 (dd, J = 1.2 Hz, 1H, OCH); HRMS for (M+-H): calcd. 257.0450, found: 257.0464.

6-(3,5-Dihydroxyphenyl)-3-methyl-4H-furo[3,2-c]pyran-4-one (26)

70% yield; mp >300 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD, ppm): δ 2.86 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 3H, CH3), 6.35 (t, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H, aromatic), 6.80 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 2H, aromatic), 7.21 (s, 1H, C7-H), 7.51 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 1H, OCH); HRMS for ([M+H]+): calcd. 259.0601, found: 259.0594.

6-(3-Ethoxyphenyl)-3-methyl-4H-furo[3,2-c]pyran-4-one (12)

To a mixture of 13 (212 mg, 1.00 mmol), K2CO3 (300 mg, 2.17 mmol) in actone (8 mL) was added iodoethane (0.4 mL, 5.00 mmol). The mixture was stirred for 12 h. The mixture was concentrated and diluted with H2O and extracted with EtOAc. The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and evaporated. The residue was purified by column chromatography to give a white solid.

35% yield; mp 128-130 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): δ 1.45 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H, CH2CH3), 2.33 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 3H, CH3), 4.10 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H, CH2CH3), 6.95-6.96 (m, 1H, aromatic), 6.98 (s, 1H, C7-H), 7.29 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H, OCH), 7.32-7.43 (m, 3H, aromatic); HRMS for ([M+H]+): calcd. 271.0965, found: 271.0962.

6-(3,5-Dimethoxyphenyl)-3-methyl-4H-furo[3,2-c]pyran-4-thione (30)

A mixture of 25 (0.1 mmol) and Lawesson's reagent (81 mg, 0.2 mmol) in dry toluene (5 mL) was heated to reflux for 12 h. Toluene was removed and the red residue was dissolved in EtOAc and partitioned with H2O. The organic phase was separated and dried over Na2SO4. Removal of solvent in vacuo afforded an oily, residue which was purified by column chromatography resulting in a yellow solid.

60% yield; mp 147-149 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): δ 2.46 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 3H, CH3), 3.87 (s, 6H, OCH3), 6.57 (t, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H, C7-H), 7.02 (s, 1H, aromatic), 7.03 (s, 1H, aromatic), 7.17 (s, 1H, aromatic), 7.32 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H, OCH); HRMS for (M++H): calcd. 303.0691, found: 303.0702.

Methodology of MTT assay

The MTT assay was used to independently test the potent activity of 25 against SK-BR-3 and to investigate antitumor selectivity versus activity against two normal breast cancer cell lines: 184A1 and MCF10A (CRL-10317) purchased from ATCC (Rockville, MD). Cells were seeded into 96 well plates at a density of 5000 cells per well in the recommended growth medium. The drug was dissolved in DMSO. The drug was added into wells after overnight incubation. After 72 h of incubation at 37 °C in 5% CO2, 20 μL of MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5 -diphenyl tetrazolium bromide] reagent was added to each well and incubation continued for 2 h. The amount of formazan product was measured at an OD of 570 nM using a plate-reader.

Supplementary Material

01

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Structures of neo-tanshinlactone (1), a first generation neo-tanshinlactone analog 2, a second generation optimized analog 3, and a newly designed scaffold 4

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by a NIH grant CA-17625 from the National Cancer Institute, awarded to K.H. Lee.

†Abbreviations

ER

estrogen receptor

HER2

human epidermal growth factor receptor 2

SAR

structure-activity relationship

TAM

tamoxifen

DIEA

diisopropylethylamine

DMAP

4-(dimethyl amino) pyridine

LDA

lithium diisopropylamide

TMEDA

tetramethylethylenediamine

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Supporting Information Available: HPLC analysis for final compounds.

References

  • 1.Coley HM. Mechanisms and strategies to overcome chemotherapy resistance in metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 2008;34:378–90. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2008.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wang X, Bastow KF, Sun CM, Lin YL, Yu HJ, Don MJ, Wu TS, Nakamura S, Lee KH. Antitumor Agents. 239. Isolation, structure elucidation, total synthesis, and anti-breast cancer activity of neo-tanshinlactone from Salvia miltiorrhiza. J Med Chem. 2004;47:5816–9. doi: 10.1021/jm040112r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Albrand G, Terret C. Early breast cancer in the elderly: assessment and management considerations. Drugs Aging. 2008;25:35–45. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200825010-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Breast Cancer Facts & Figures. 2008.
  • 5.Chari RVJ. Targeted Cancer Therapy: Conferring Specificity to Cytotoxic Drugs. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008;41:98–107. doi: 10.1021/ar700108g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hickey JL, Ruhayel RA, Barnard PJ, Baker MV, Berners-Price SJ, Filipovska A. Mitochondria-Targeted Chemotherapeutics: The Rational Design of Gold(I) N-Heterocyclic Carbene Complexes That Are Selectively Toxic to Cancer Cells and Target Protein Selenols in Preference to Thiols. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:12570–12571. doi: 10.1021/ja804027j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pedram B, van Oeveren A, Mais DE, Marschke KB, Verbost PM, Groen MB, Zhi L. A Tissue-Selective Nonsteroidal Progesterone Receptor Modulator: 7,9-Difluoro-5-(3-methylcyclohex-2-enyl)-2,2,4-trimethyl-1,2-dihydrochromeno[3,4-f]quinoline. J. Med. Chem. 2008;51:3696–3699. doi: 10.1021/jm8004256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hariprakasha HK, Kosakowska-Cholody T, Meyer C, Cholody WM, Stinson SF, Tarasova NI, Michejda CJ. Optimization of Naphthalimide-imidazoacridone with Potent Antitumor Activity Leading to Clinical Candidate (HKH40A, RTA 502). J. Med. Chem. 2007;50:5557–5560. doi: 10.1021/jm7009777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Vuorelaa P, Leinonenb M, Saikkuc P, Tammelaa P, Rauhad JP, Wennberge T, Vuorela H. Natural products in the process of finding new drug candidates. Curr Med Chem. 2004;11:1375–89. doi: 10.2174/0929867043365116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Balunas MJ, Kinghorn AD. Drug discovery from medicinal plants. Life Sci. 2005;78:431–441. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2005.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Saklani A, Kutty SK. Plant-derived compounds in clinical trials. Drug Discov Today. 2008;13:161–71. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2007.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Magedov IV, Manpadi M, Ogasawara MA, Dhawan AS, Rogelj S, Van Slambrouck S, Steelant WFA, Evdokimov NM, Uglinskii PY, Elias EM, Knee EJ, Tongwa P, Antipin MY, Kornienko A. Structural simplification of bioactive natural products with multicomponent synthesis. 2. Antiproliferative and antitubulin activities of pyrano[3,2-c]pyridones and pyrano[3,2-c]quinolones. J. Med. Chem. 2008;51:2561–2570. doi: 10.1021/jm701499n. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Raghavan B, Balasubramanian R, Steele JC, Sackett DL, Fecik RA. Cytotoxic Simplified Tubulysin Analogues. J. Med. Chem. 2008;51:1530–1533. doi: 10.1021/jm701321p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wolff ME. Burger's Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery. fifth ed. Vol. 1. 1994. p. 1064. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wang X, Nakagawa-Goto K, Bastow KF, Don MJ, Lin YL, Wu TS, Lee KH. Antitumor agents. 254. Synthesis and biological evaluation of novel neo-tanshinlactone analogues as potent anti-breast cancer agents. J Med Chem. 2006;49:5631–4. doi: 10.1021/jm060184d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dong Y, Shi Q, Liu Y-N, Wang X, Bastow KF, Lee K-H. Antitumor Agents. 266. Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Novel 2-(Furan-2-yl)naphthalen-1-ol Derivatives as Potent and Selective Antibreast Cancer Agents. J. Med. Chem. 2009;52:3586–3590. doi: 10.1021/jm9001567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Douglas CJ, Sklenicka HM, Shen HC, Mathias DS, Degen SJ, Golding GM, Morgan CD, Shih RA, Mueller KL, Seurer LM, Johnson EW, Hsung RP. Synthesis and UV studies of a small library of 6-aryl-4-hydroxy-2-pyrones. A relevant structural feature for the inhibitory property of arisugacin against acetylcholinesterase. Tetrahedron. 1999;55:13683–13696. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Risitano F, Grassi G, Foti F, Bilardo C. A convenient synthesis of furo[3,2-c]coumarins by a tandem alkylation/intramolecular aldolization reaction. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001;42:3503–3505. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Boeckman RK, Jr., Ge P, Reed JE. New Heterocyclic Precursors for Thermal Generation of Reactive, Electron-Rich 1,2-Diaza-1,3-butadienes. Org. Lett. 2001;3:3647–3650. doi: 10.1021/ol0165645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

01

RESOURCES