Abstract
Ultrasound application in the presence of microbubbles is a promising strategy for intracellular delivery drug and gene, but it may also trigger other cellular responses. This study investigates the relationship between the change of cell membrane permeability generated by ultrasound-driven microbubbles and the changes in intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i). Cultured rat cardiomyoblast (H9c2) cells were exposed to a single ultrasound pulse (1 MHz, 10–15 cycles, 0.27 MPa) in the presence of a Definity™ microbubble. Intracellular transport via sonoporation was assessed in real time using propidium iodide (PI), while [Ca2+]i and dye loss from the cells were measured with preloaded fura-2. The ultrasound exposure generated fragmentation or shrinking of the microbubble. Only cells adjacent to the ultrasound-driven microbubble exhibited propidium iodide (PI) uptake with simultaneous [Ca2+]i increase and fura-2 dye loss. The amount of PI uptake was correlated with the amount of fura-2 dye loss. Cells with delayed [Ca2+]i transients from the time of ultrasound application had no uptake of PI. These results indicate the formation of non-specific pores in the cell membrane by ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles and the generation of calcium waves in surrounding cells without pores.
Keywords: Sonoporation, ultrasound, intracellular delivery, intracellular calcium, fast-frame photography, microbubble contrast agents, calcium imaging
INTRODUCTION
Sonoporation has shown promise to facilitate intracellular transport of drugs, proteins, genes, and other therapeutic agents that are otherwise impermeable to the cell [1-13]. Because ultrasound exposure can be non-invasively controlled in application volume and location as well as exposure duration, sonoporation is uniquely suitable for in vivo site-specific delivery [14, 15]. However, even with recent progress in the field, a detailed mechanistic description of sonoporation and its full range of bioeffects remains to be elucidated [16].
Sonoporation is significantly enhanced by both inertial cavitation [17-20] and stable cavitation [21, 22], typically with microbubble ultrasound contrast agents [23, 24] to act as cavitation nuclei, possibly via microjetting and shock waves from collapsing bubbles [17, 25, 26], shear stress from microstreaming induced by bubble oscillations [21, 27, 28], chemical effects [29-31], and penetration of bubbles or bubble shell fragments into the cell [32].
Recent studies have demonstrated that cells treated with ultrasound with microbubbles in the medium can exhibit temporal calcium transients [30, 32, 33]. In particular, we have shown temporal calcium oscillations and spatial waves can be generated, resulting in calcium changes in cells away from the cells that directly interact with microbubbles over distances of hundreds of microns and tens of seconds after ultrasound application [34]. Because intracellular calcium is an important second messenger that regulates signal transduction and other intracellular processes, changes in the intracellular calcium ion concentration, [Ca2+]i, resulting from ultrasound exposure may have unintended consequences in ultrasound-mediated delivery applications such as cardiac gene transfection and targeted cancer drug delivery. However, while the aforementioned studies have suggested that calcium response occurs as a result of ultrasound application in the presence of microbubbles, it is not explicitly clear whether sonoporation of the cell membrane with intracellular delivery directly causes [Ca2+]i activities.
In this study, we employ a combination of imaging techniques to determine whether sonoporation of cardiomyoblast cells and [Ca2+]i changes are generated by the interaction between individual microbubbles and cells via pore formation. Ultrasound-driven microbubble activity was imaged using high-speed bright-field imaging, which was synchronized and spatially correlated with a real-time fluorescence imaging system specially designed to simultaneously measure changes in [Ca2+]i and membrane permeabilization using multiple fluorescent dyes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cell culturing
H9c2 rat cardiomyoblast cells (ATCC, Manassas, VA) were grown in a humidified incubator at 37°C and 5% CO2 in cell culture flasks containing the complete cell culture medium consisting of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Gibco Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (HyClone, Logan, UT) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (HyClone, Logan, UT). Two days before the sonoporation experiment, the cells were harvested from the flasks and seeded into an OptiCell™ chamber (Nunc, Rochester, NY) filled with the same cell culture medium. OptiCell™ chambers consist of two parallel, gas-permeable, cell-culture-treated, polystyrene membranes (50 cm2, 75 μm thick, 2 mm apart) attached to a standard microtiter plate-sized frame. At the time of experiment, the cells had reached approximately 70% confluency.
Microbubble ultrasound contrast agent
Definity™ (Lantheus Medical Imaging, Billerca, MA) consists of distributed encapsulated microbubbles, each with a C3F8 gas core encapsulated by an outer phospholipid shell. Immediately after activation following the manufacturer's protocol, the suspension contains approximately 1.2×1010 microbubbles/mL with mean diameter range of 1.1 μm–3.3 μm. However, for the current experiments, the solution was diluted with PBS to have a final concentration of 106 microbubbles/mL such that most cells had only 1 or 2 bubbles in their immediate vicinity, which was verified by direct optical observation prior to ultrasound exposure.
Measurement of intracellular calcium concentration
Fluorescence imaging of [Ca2+]i was performed using the indicator dye fura-2 [35]. To load the dye into the cells, the cells were incubated for 60 minutes at 37°C and 5% CO2 in complete cell culture medium containing 7.8 μM fura-2AM (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) dissolved in DMSO and 0.05% v/v of 10% w/v Pluronic F-127 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) in water. After incubation, excess dye was removed by washing the cells three times with complete culture medium before ultrasound exposure. The Opticell™ chamber was then filled with Dulbecco's Phosphate-Buffered Saline solution (DPBS, Gibco Invitrogen 14040, Carlsbad, CA), which has [Ca2+]o = 0.9 mM. Quantitative measurement of [Ca2+]i was achieved via calibrated ratiometric imaging. The “raw” emitted fluorescence intensities (at 510 nm) for both excitation wavelengths 340 nm and 380 nm in each cell was determined from manually segmented regions of the cell in the images. The background-corrected fluorescence intensities (F340, F380) were obtained by subtracting the fluorescence intensity from an area free of cells from the raw intensities. The ratio R=F340/F380 was related to the change in the intracellular calcium concentration according to
(1) |
where the parameters Rmin = 0.0226, Rmax = 0.749, and β = 8.37 were obtained by using a fura-2 calibration kit (Invitrogen F6774, Carlsbad, CA) without cells and Kd = 155 nM was taken from the literature [36].
Determination of membrane permeabilization with propidium iodide
Change in cell membrane permeabilization by ultrasound was assessed by detecting the intracellular fluorescence intensity of the intercalating agent propidium iodide (PI; 668 Da) (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). After loading with fura-2, PI was added to the extracellular solution to achieve a final concentration of 120 μM. To detect PI, the specimen was excited at 539 nm, and emission was detected at 610 nm. (Excitation at the ultraviolet wavelengths caused a very low-intensity emission from PI that cannot be fully distinguished from the emission from the fura-2; however, this effect is estimated to cause an error of less than 5%.) As PI only fluoresces at these wavelengths when inside the cell, it provides a good real-time marker for delivery via membrane disruption from the extracellular solution with real-time fluorescence imaging. While irreversible changes in PI fluorescence are often used as a marker for cell death, here transient changes in PI fluorescence were also used as a marker for permeation of the cell membrane.
Optical imaging and data analysis
A schematic diagram of the experimental apparatus is shown in Fig. 1. The fura-2-loaded cells in the OptiCell™ chamber filled with the solution of PI and microbubbles were placed on a 37°C heating stage of an inverted microscope (Nikon Eclipse Ti-U, Melville, NY). The real-time fluorescence imaging employed a monochromator (DeltaRAM X™, PTI, Birmingham, NJ) with 5 nm bandpass to repeatedly filter light from a 75 W xenon lamp at the various excitation wavelengths previously described, with an exposure time of 656 ms during fura-2 imaging and 400 ms during PI imaging. The excitation light was directed through either a 20X Super Fluor (Nikon MRF00200, Melville, NY; NA 0.75) or a 40X Plan Fluor objective (Nikon MRH08420, Melville, NY; NA 0.60) and the light subsequently emitted from the cells was passed through a polychroic filter (Chroma 73000v2, Rockingham, VT) with passbands in the green and red. The resulting series of 16 bit grayscale photomicrographs were acquired with a cooled CCD camera (Photometrics QuantEM, Tucson, AZ) at 512 × 512 resolution. Electron multiplication gain in the camera was set to 100% during fura-2 imaging and 80% during PI imaging. The image acquisition and analysis from this camera were performed using the software package Easy Ratio Pro (PTI, Birmingham, NJ). To create the calibrated calcium images, image post-processing was performed using MATLAB (Mathworks, Natick, MA) and MetaFluor Analyst (Molecular Devices, Downingtown, PA). Noise in the regions outside the cells was suppressed by using intensity-modulated display approach [37] using the 340 nm images for modulation, as described previously [33]. The grayscale PI images were artificially-colored red for display purposes by zeroing the green and blue components of each pixel.
Figure 1.
Schematic diagram of experimental apparatus for spatiotemporal measurements of intracellular delivery of fluorescent marker and calcium transients generated by ultrasound-driven microbubble activities.
Microbubble activity was captured using a high-speed, brightfield camera (Photron FASTCAM SA1, San Diego, CA) at a resolution of 1024 × 1024, rate of 5400 frames/s, and total exposure time of ~2 s. The specimen was illuminated with metal-halide light source (Dolan-Jenner MH-100, Boxborough, MA) only during the high-speed imaging.
Ultrasound application and calibration
The ultrasound system used for the experiment consisted of a non-focused circular transducer specially-designed and constructed for our study (1 MHz center frequency, 0.635 cm diameter, Advanced Devices, Wakefield, MA). The transducer was driven by a function/waveform generator (Agilent Technologies 33250A, Palo Alto, CA) and a 75 W power amplifier (Amplifier Research 75A250, Souderton, PA). The transducer was characterized in free field using computer-controlled system with a 40 μm calibrated needle hydrophone (Precision Acoustics HPM04/1, UK). Prior to the experiment, the transducer was aligned with the field of view of the microscope objective using a thin wire attached on the top surface of a water-filled OptiCell™ with a plastic wall attached around its entire edge to create a small tank, which was subsequently filled with de-ionized water for acoustic energy coupling.
This alignment apparatus was then removed and replaced by the Opticell™ containing the cells loaded with fura-2 and with PI in the extracellular medium, also with a coupling tank on top filled with deionized water. The water in the tank is physically isolated from the cells by the upper membrane of the Opticell™ chamber. The transducer was positioned such that the active surface of the ultrasound transducer submerged in solution was ~7 mm from the cells at the bottom of the dish at an angle of approximately 45 degrees (Fig. 1). The transducer had a near field distance of ~6.4 mm and spatial width (half-max) at 7.5 mm, which is the approximate distance between the transducer and OptiCell™ chamber during the experiments. As such, the entire field of view of the microscope (200 × 200 μm at 40X, 400 × 400 μm at 20X) was insonified. The cells are attached to the top polystyrene membrane of the OptiCell™ chamber. Standing wave effects [38] due to the bottom membrane of the OptiCell ™ were minimized by angling the ultrasound beam and using short pulses. The generated ultrasound waveforms at the region of interest had peak negative pressure of 0.27 MPa as determined from the calibration above. A single ultrasound tone burst of 10 or 15 cycles was applied during each experiment.
Experimental protocols
Two protocols were used in our experiments, schematically illustrated in Fig.2. In the first protocol, the microbubbles were imaged during ultrasound application and included the following steps (1) baseline fluorescence imaging performed with sequential excitation at 340nm, 380nm and 539nm for 20 s; (2) baseline brightfield high-speed imaging performed for 10 ms; (3) ultrasound application during the high-speed imaging; (4) fluorescence imaging continued with the same excitation sequence for up to 5 min. Synchronization of ultrasound pulse and bright field imaging ensured that brightfield images would be acquired before, during, and after the ultrasound pulse. Immediately after the brightfield imaging was completed, the microscope was manually switched back to the fluorescence camera, which continued to run throughout the brightfield imaging to maintain a continuous time base during the entire duration of the experiment. Since light could only be directed to one camera at a time, the information from the fluorescent dyes is not captured during the time when the ultrasound pulse is applied and the bright field imaging is performed. There were 18 independent experiments conducted following the first protocol. In these experiments a total of 28 different cells each with one adjacent bubble were studied.
Figure 2.
Schematic diagram of experimental protocols for monitoring intracellular delivery and calcium transients generated by ultrasound-driven microbubbles.
The second protocol involved only fluorescence imaging without the bright field imaging. In addition to excitations at 340 nm, 380 nm and 539 nm, fluorescence imaging in the second protocol also included excitation at 360 nm, the isosbestic wavelength of fura-2, to investigate the leakage of the pre-loaded fura-2 out of the cell due to sonoporation of the cell membrane. At the isosbestic point of the dye, the fluorescent emission is independent of the [Ca2+]i. As such, this wavelength was used as a measure of fura-2 dye concentration [39-41]. A series of 15 independent experiments were conducted following the second protocol. A total of 36 cells, which showed [Ca2+]i transient, were analyzed.
The isosbestic point of fura-2 was confirmed in our experiments to be 360 nm by examining the emission intensities as a function of time in cells sequentially excited at 340 nm, 360 nm, 361 nm, 362 nm, 380 nm, and 539 nm (for PI excitation) as the result of ultrasound application to initiate change (increase) in [Ca2+]i. In the cells that did not exhibit PI uptake but with (delayed) change in [Ca2+]i (e.g., as a result of a calcium wave but not pores on the membrane), the emission intensity from 360 nm excitation stayed unchanged, while the emission intensities from excitation at longer wavelengths increasingly resembled the response from excitation at 380 nm (which decreases in amplitude when [Ca2+]i increases).
Curve fitting
Following a previous proposed model [42, 43], the change in PI intensity due to PI uptake was fitted to a two-parameter exponential recovery function
(2) |
where t = 0 is the time of the ultrasound application, τPI the characteristic PI recovery time and PI∞ the asymptotic PI intensity. Analogously, intensity changes due to fura-2 dye loss measured with the 360 nm excitation were fitted to a two-parameter exponential decay function
(3) |
where τF360 is the characteristic decay time for fura-2 dye leakage and and are the initial fura-2 intensity from 360 nm excitation before ultrasound exposure (known) and the asymptotic fura-2 intensity at long times. Fitting was performed using the routines of the MATLAB Curve Fitting Tool using the default parameter on all data except those with signal-to-noise ratios so low that meaningful fitting was not possible. Goodness-of-fit was assessed using the R2 parameter (ratio of the sum of squares of the regression and the total sum of squares).
RESULTS
Ultrasound-driven microbubble activities, sonoporation, and calcium transients
In the set of experiments using the first protocol, microbubble dynamics were observed using the high-speed camera during the application of ultrasound while the intracellular delivery of the marker PI from the extracellular solution and the [Ca2+]i response were measured using real-time fluorescence imaging. Control experiments with no microbubbles or no ultrasound yielded no PI uptake. Only those microbubbles that were immediately adjacent to the cell resulted in any observable changes in the cells. Figure 3 shows the results of a typical single experiment. Figures 3A and 3B show pre-ultrasound PI and [Ca2+]i (pseudocolor) images superimposed on the brightfield image of the same field of view taken prior to the start of the fluorescence imaging and ultrasound application with the region of interest indicated by the solid while lines on the main body of two cells. Cell 2 is adjacent to a microbubble (indicated by the arrow) while Cell 1 is not. The absence of PI in cells (no red in Fig. 3A) indicates their viability with intact membrane (the extracellular solution contains PI). After initial baseline fluorescence imaging, the microscope is switched to the high-speed brightfield imaging followed by ultrasound application. Figures 3C and 3D show the mean PI fluorescence intensity and [Ca2+]i, respectively, as a function of time for the regions of interest corresponding to Cells 1 and 2 in Fig. 3A and 3B. The significant increase of PI intensity in Cell 2 is clearly shown in Fig.3C, indicating intracellular PI delivery via sonoporation. Figure 3D shows that the average [Ca2+]i also increases significantly in Cell 2 before eventually returning to an equilibrium value. The return of the [Ca2+]i of Cell 2 to an equilibrium value suggests that the cell is still alive even though delivery has occurred. Figure 3E shows the ultrasound-induced stimulation of the microbubble adjacent to Cell 2. The bubble is seen to fragment into three smaller bubbles resulting from the ultrasound pulse. In contrast, both PI fluorescence intensity and the [Ca2+]i are essentially unaffected for the nearby Cell 1 in the absence of bubble activities in close proximity.
Figure 3.
Propidium iodide (PI) delivery and intracellular [Ca2+]i transients are temporally correlated with ultrasound-driven microbubbles. (A) Brightfield image with superimposed PI fluorescence image before ultrasound application. No PI is observed in the cells. The solid lines show two regions of interest within cells (Cell 1 and Cell 2). The arrow points the microbubble next to Cell 2. (B) Brightfield image with superimposed pseudocolor [Ca2+]i image, indicating the initial [Ca2+]i distribution before ultrasound application. (C) PI fluorescence intensity changes (from the baseline) as a function of time for Cells 1 and 2 induced by ultrasound simulation of the microbubbles. (D) [Ca2+]i changes for Cells 1 and 2 as a function of time. In C and D, the break indicates the period when light was directed to the high speed camera. (E) High-speed camera recordings of the ultrasound-driven microbubble inside the dashed frames in (A) and (B) showing bubble fragmentation.
Spatiotemporal evolution of intracellular marker and calcium
Figure 4 shows spatiotemporal evolution of the intracellular PI (Fig. 4A) and [Ca2+]i changes (Fig. 4B), corresponding to the traces of Figs. 3C and 3D. The white lines show the of the regions of interest corresponding to Cell 1 and Cell 2 while the location of the microbubble before ultrasound is indicated by the small circle. Figure 4A shows that the PI delivery originates in the immediate vicinity of the microbubble at the time of the ultrasound application and then diffuses to the other areas of Cell 2 over the next 4 minutes, while Cell 1 is entirely unaffected. Figure 4B shows that the [Ca2+]i increases from less than 100 nM to more than 500 nM and then recovers. Again, the [Ca2+]i of Cell 1 is unaffected. Taken together, Figs. 3 and 4 illustrate that PI delivery and change in [Ca2+]i are spatially and temporally correlated in cell sonoporation due to an ultrasound-stimulated microbubble.
Figure 4.
Intracellular delivery of propidium iodide (PI) and intracellular [Ca2+]i transients are spatially correlated with stimulation of microbubbles by ultrasound. (A) Time-lapse PI fluorescence images and (B) pseudocolor [Ca2+]i images, corresponding to the traces shown in Fig. 3C and D respectively. The solid lines show the two regions of interest (Cell 1 and Cell 2), while the circle outlines microbubble next to Cell 2 at the beginning of the experiment. The color bar indicates the [Ca2+]i in nM. The first row shows the cells before ultrasound exposure while the subsequent rows show the cells at the indicated times after ultrasound application.
In every case of PI delivery, [Ca2+]i changes also occurred simultaneously. While the individual bubble oscillations were not resolved due to limitation of the imaging frame rate relative to the ultrasound frequency, the high-speed bright field imaging clearly showed a change in the bubble after each ultrasound pulse.
The simultaneous occurrence of microbubble changes, PI uptake, and [Ca2+]i transients indicates that the transient pore formation induced by the microbubble stimulation is likely the cause for the observed [Ca2+]i transients.
Delayed calcium transport in cells without pore formation
While the results described above demonstrated that immediate [Ca2+]i transients are correlated with PI delivery in cells affected by ultrasound-driven microbubble activities, cells with delayed [Ca2+]i transients showed no PI uptake. Figure 5 shows the spatiotemporal evolution of the PI delivery (Fig. 5A) and the changes in [Ca2+]i (Fig. 5B) for five cells and corresponding time traces (Fig. 5C, D) from a single experiment. Prior to the application of ultrasound, no cells exhibited PI fluorescence and all the cells showed normal levels of [Ca2+]i. However, immediately after the ultrasound was applied, only Cell 1 exhibited a calcium transient with PI delivery (in red) indicating sonoporation on the right side of the cell. Subsequently, the nearby Cells 2–5 showed an increase in [Ca2+]i with delays of 6 s, 6 s, 12 s, and 42 s, respectively, but exhibited no sign of PI delivery. After 140 s, all cells had returned to their equilibrium [Ca2+]i except Cell 1. It is noted that the amplitude of the increase in [Ca2+]i in sonoporated cells is much higher than those in cells with delayed change in [Ca2+]i due to calcium waves.
Figure 5.
(A) Time-lapse sequence of PI fluorescence images and (B) time-lapse sequence of psuedocolor [Ca2+]i images for five cells, where the color bar in row B indicates the [Ca2+]i in mM. Only Cell 1 (arrow) shows immediate [Ca2+]i change at the time of ultrasound and immediately PI uptake are seen in only cell 1 (arrow pointed). Cells 2 to 5 show delayed [Ca2+]i transients without any PI uptake. (C) [Ca2+]i as a function of time for Cells 1–5, showing the immediate change in calcium (cell 2) and delayed calcium change (cells 2–5). The [Ca2+]i returned to a higher level than initial [Ca2+]i for Cell 1, while all the delayed cells returned to approximately their initial level. (D) PI intensity change as a function of time for Cells 1–5. Only Cell 1 shows any PI uptake.
Concentration-gradient driven, bi-directional transport of markers and pore closure
With clear evidence for the correlation between marker delivery, calcium changes, and microbbuble activity, a second set of experiments was performed to focus on sonoporation quantification. For a total of 36 different cells, in all but one of the cells, simultaneous PI uptake and [Ca2+]i transients were observed immediately after ultrasound exposure. In one case, no PI uptake was detected but a small immediate [Ca2+]i transient still occurred. It is possible that PI uptake may have still occurred but may have been below the detection threshold of our system ([Ca2+]i > 20.4 nM and under PI intensities > 20.4 units).
First, the effect of sonoporation on the post-ultrasound equilibrium values of the delivery marker and [Ca2+i] was considered, where five minutes was empirically determined to be a sufficient time period for most cells to reach equilibrium or near-equilibrium conditions. Figure 6 shows a scatterplot of the [Ca2+]i change = [Ca2+]i(t = 5 min) – [Ca2+]i(t = 0 min) as a function of PI intensity change = PI(t = 5 min) – PI(t = 0 min) from multiple experiments. The data demonstrate that the changes in PI and [Ca2+]i are positively correlated (linear correlation coefficient R = +0.91), showing both that sonoporation caused marker delivery and that increased delivery resulted in increased [Ca2+]i long after the ultrasound exposure had ended.
Figure 6.
Scatterplot of [Ca2+]i change and PI intensity change, both at 5 min since the start of fluorescence imaging for 36 cells, showing positive correlation (R = +0.91). In each case, the cells are exposed to a single 15 μs tone burst of ultrasound starting at 50 s after the start of fluorescence imaging.
Next, the effect of sonoporation on the pre-loaded dye fura-2 was investigated. If sonoporation creates non-specific pores, then the preloaded dye might leak out of the cell as the delivery marker PI is transported into the cell.
Figure 7A shows the typical result from sonoporated cells from a single experiment with the isosbestic point excitation included. The PI intensity increases in the cell after ultrasound application, indicating marker delivery due to pore formation. At the same time, the [Ca2+]i transiently increases and then decreases to an equilibrium level.
Figure 7.
Pore generation is corroborated by simultaneous PI uptake, [Ca2+]i increase, and fura-2 dye loss. (A) Changes in PI fluorescence intensity, [Ca2+]i, and fura-2 fluorescence intensity from excitation at 360 nm as a function of time, as induced by ultrasound-driven microbubbles for the cell shown in the inset (arrow pointing to microbubble), indicating increase in [Ca2+]i, PI uptake, and fura-2 dye loss generated by ultrasound application. Dashed lines show fitting of PI uptake and fura-2 loss to exponential recovery or decay models. (B) The change of fura-2 intensity from excitation at 360 nm and change of PI intensity change, both at 5 min since the start of fluorescence imaging for 36 cells are negatively correlated (R = –0.78), indicating loss of fura-2.
Finally, the emission from 360 nm excitation decreases, implying a loss of fura-2 dye from the cell and thereby also indicating the existence of pore on the cell membrane. (Recall that the ratio of the emission intensities due to excitations at 340 nm and 380 nm is used to derive [Ca2+]i and is thus essentially independent of dye concentration.)
The dashed lines on the figure (Fig. 7A) show the fit of the PI uptake to Eq. (2) (τPI = 34.2 s, PI∞ = 58.4) and fura-2 dye loss to Eq. (3) (τF360 = 13.8 s, ). Figure 7B shows that over multiple experiments the change in the emission intensity from the 360 nm excitation F360 change = F360(t = 5 min) – F360 (t = 0 min) is negatively correlated with the PI intensity change = PI(t = 5 min) – PI(t = 0 min) in these experiments (R = –0.78), indicating that amount of marker delivery is related to the amount of dye loss. Using the fitting Eq. (2) and (3), the mean and standard deviation of the exponential recovery time constant τPI for PI was found to be 50 ± 32 s, while the mean and standard deviation of the exponential decay time constant τF360 for the fura-2 dye loss was 25 ± 15 s. Although the exponential time constants depend on a combination of factors, the asymptotic behavior of fluorescence intensities of PI and fura-2 (excited at 360 nm) suggests that the time constants reflect the resealing rate of the pores on the cell membrane.
Cell viability
All of the cells affected by ultrasound-bubble included in this study (no data were excluded) and presented above were viable at the end of the 5 minute observation period after ultrasound application because they meet the following conditions: (1) its US-induced [Ca2+]i rises and then returns to an equilibrium value (although it may not necessarily be its initial value), (2) the PI intensity reaches a stable plateau which is much lower than the PI intensities exhibited by the cells that were dead (verified by Trypan blue assay) before ultrasound application, and (3) the fura-2 emission intensity due to 360 nm excitation (when brightfield imaging was not performed) drops but reaches a non-zero equilibrium value that is higher than the final equilibrium fluorescence intensity exhibited by the cells that were dead before ultrasound application (confirmed by Trypan blue assay).
DISCUSSION
The goal of this study is to relate cell membrane poration and generation of calcium transients by employing an experimental setup with the combined capability of imaging the spatio-temporal changes of fura-2 and PI simultaneously. While previous studies have employed PI for determining sonoporation [18, 21, 31, 44], have measured fluorescence intensities related to calcium concentration during sonoporation [30, 45], and used fura-2 dye loss as a measure of sonoporation [44], in this study we measured the spatiotemporal PI intensity, calibrated [Ca2+]i, fura-2 dye changes, together in real time (Figs. 3, 4, 6, 7), correlated these changes for specific, individual cell-bubble interactions (Figs. 6, 7), and quantitatively measured the recovery time constants and fluorescence intensities. The role of ultrasound-induced microbubble changes was verified by the acquisition of high-speed images of the same bubbles and cells, before, during, and immediately after a short ultrasound pulse (Fig. 3). While calcium waves resulting from sonoporation have been previously observed [32-34], we demonstrated explicitly that cells exhibiting [Ca2+]i waves were not sonoporated themselves (Fig. 5).
Previous studies without microbubbles [45] and with microbubbles [30, 34] have shown that cells increase [Ca2+]i when the extracellular calcium concentration is greater than the intracellular concentration but show no change or decrease in [Ca2+]i when the cells are in medium with zero extracellular calcium. Both of these responses are consistent with Ca2+ transport into the cell through nonspecific pores, but existence of physical pores of membrane disruption, e.g., indicated by concomitant delivery of a membrane-impermeable marker from the extracellular solution, was not explicitly demonstrated. In the current study, the spatiotemporal correlation between the microbubble and change in PI fluorescence and [Ca2+]i (Figs. 4, 5) in sonoporated cells indicate that the ultrasound-driven microbubble is the cause for the [Ca2+]i transients in these cells. However, it is possible that other intracellular mechanisms can also be triggered subsequently by the pore formation (e.g., calcium-induced calcium release), as has also been suggested by others [46]. In general, the recovery of [Ca2+]i is mostly likely the result of several complex processes including active extracellular efflux, protein buffering, and storage in the sarcoplasmic reticulum and mitrochondria.
Cells with delayed [Ca2+]i transients with respect to the cells with immediate [Ca2+]i transients generated by ultrasound-driven microbubble as well as PI uptake showed no PI delivery (Fig. 5), indicating that the delayed transients are not directly due to pores on the membrane, but result from “calcium waves”, as observed previously in a different cell type [33, 34]. Hence [Ca2+]i transients alone are not a good indicator for permeabilization in sonoporation for intracellular macromolecule delivery. Tsukamoto et al. [32] similarly have observed the existence of calcium transients delayed with the respect to the time of ultrasound application, particularly in cells adjacent to cells that exhibited membrane rupture (as determined by an irreversible decrease in the 380 nm excitation signal of fura-2). In studies on a variety of cells, [Ca2+]i transients have been shown to result from both intracellular [47] and extracellular transport of messengers [48].
A recent study showed that delivery by endocytosis can also occur as a result of ultrasound exposure, particularly for larger weight molecules (> 150 kDa). [49]. Imaging from the current study showed that the intracellular PI delivery was only seen initially at the area adjacent to the ultrasound-driven microbubble, despite the fact that the entire field of view is exposed to ultrasound. The PI fluorescence gradually became increasingly distributed inside the cell, and calcium changes also rapidly occur throughout the cell. These observations are inconsistent with the localization within vesicles that is observed in endocytotic delivery. Instead, it is more likely that ultrasound mediated intracellular delivery of PI observed in our experiments results from the passive transport of macromolecules into the cytosol through non-specific pores and/or physical disruption of the membrane [17, 21, 50-55].
The mean 99% recovery times observed in our study from time-dependent measurements of marker intensities (5τPI ≈ 250 s or 5τF360 ≈ 125 s) are somewhat slower than those observed previously in mechanical wounding of 10 to 30 s [39-41] of murine fibroblasts, but faster than the recovery times of 600 s in some electroporation experiments based on averaging over many murine myeloma cells [42, 43]. These differences can come from a number of factors, including difference cell types, methods of membrane wounding, as well as fluorescent dye kinetics. In addition, the scatterplots of Figs. 6 and 7 suggest that there is a significant amount of variability in the sonoporation process in terms of the amount of marker delivery or loss. It is possible that inherent differences in nucleic acid distribution or concentration within the cell, intercellular variations in fura-2 dye loading, and differences in the size and distance of the microbubbles could contribute this variability, but effects from these factors were not determined.
This study has several limitations. First, the study was performed on a single cell type. However, the results were qualitatively similar to those observed in other studies with other cell lines in regards to [Ca2+]i response (Chinese hamster ovary cells [33, 34]), propidium iodide changes (bovine aorta endothelial cells [18, 44]), and fura-2 dye loss (bovine aorta endothelial cells [44]). Second, the study did not independently assess (e.g., by hydrophone measurements) the nature of the cavitation mechanism (i.e., stable or inertial), While the high-speed brightfield images did not have sufficiently high time resolution to conclusively determine the detailed nature of the cavitation during the pulse duration, the observation of clearly-resolvable bubble fragmentation after the ultrasound pulse in over half the experiments strongly suggests that inertial cavitation is likely to have occurred in these cases. In the remaining cases, the bubbles are usually smaller in diameter than before the ultrasound application, which may be suggestive of inertial cavitation, but the evidence is not conclusive. Other studies employing ultra-high speed imaging (millions of frames/s) have shown that inertial cavitation of shelled microbubbles can result under ultrasound conditions similar to those employed in this study (e.g., Optison [44]). Finally, an independent cell viability assay was not employed in this study. Hence it was not possible determine the long-term survival rate of sonoporated cells. However, we consider it likely that cells that recovered to a stable [Ca2+]i equilibrium value or had minimal PI uptake and fura-2 dye loss within a few minutes were likely to have survived, as has been similarly concluded by others [44].
Sonoporation has the ability to enhance the delivery of large-molecular weight drugs, genes, and proteins to cells, but pore formation in the cell membrane may also result in other cellular events such as calcium transients as well as hyperpolarization induced by calcium or stretch activation of ion channels [46, 56-58]. It has been suggested that arrhythmogenic changes that have been clinically observed during echocardiography [59-61] may result from calcium transients [30, 46]. Cardiac contractions can follow calcium-induced calcium release [62-64], and calcium transients and waves can be involved in arrhythmias [65-67]. Calcium waves have been found in migrating tumor cells, and an anti-metastatic drug has been shown to affect the calcium-wave properties of an invasive cancer cell line [68]. Another recent study has shown that even low-intensity ultrasound can induce excitation in neurons via activation of sodium-gated and calcium-gated ion channels [69], which may then also have implications for efforts to use ultrasound as a means to transiently permeate the blood–brain barrier. Although the exact consequences require further investigation, these cellular events could have important implications in many applications such as ultrasound mediated cardiac gene delivery and targeted cancer drug delivery and are thus worthy of further careful studies in order to develop sonoporation as a safe and robust strategy for controlled delivery of therapeutic agents.
CONCLUSION
Results from this study demonstrate that ultrasound-driven bubble activities generated pores on the cell membrane that resulted in the intracellular delivery of PI and changes in [Ca2+]i. The correlated PI gain and fura-2 loss observed in cells due to ultrasound application indicated concentration-gradient driven, bidirectional transport characteristic of non-specific pores created by the sonoporation. Cells with delayed [Ca2+]i transients showed no PI uptake in cells, indicating calcium waves that originated from nearby sonoporated cells.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health (R01CA116592 to C. X. Deng). Useful discussion with Olivia Cholewa at Invitrogen is also acknowledged.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
REFERENCES
- 1.Ng KY, Liu Y. Therapeutic ultrasound: its application in drug delivery. Med Res Rev. 2002;22(2):204–223. doi: 10.1002/med.10004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mitragotri S. Healing sound: the use of ultrasound in drug delivery and other therapeutic applications. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005;4(3):255–260. doi: 10.1038/nrd1662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wu J, Nyborg WL. Emerging therapeutic ultrasound. World Scientific; Hackensack, NJ: 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Postema M, Gilja OH. Ultrasound-directed drug delivery. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2007;8(6):355–361. doi: 10.2174/138920107783018453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Meijering BD, Henning RH, Van Gilst WH, Gavrilovic I, Van Wamel A, Deelman LE. Optimization of ultrasound and microbubbles targeted gene delivery to cultured primary endothelial cells. J Drug Target. 2007;15(10):664–671. doi: 10.1080/10611860701605088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Frenkel V. Ultrasound mediated delivery of drugs and genes to solid tumors. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008;60(10):1193–1208. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2008.03.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hynynen K. Ultrasound for drug and gene delivery to the brain. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008;60(10):1209–1217. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2008.03.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mayer CR, Geis NA, Katus HA, Bekeredjian R. Ultrasound targeted microbubble destruction for drug and gene delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2008;5(10):1121–1138. doi: 10.1517/17425247.5.10.1121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pichon C, Kaddur K, Midoux P, Tranquart F, Bouakaz A. Recent advances in gene delivery with ultrasound and microbubbles. J Exp Nanosci. 2008;3(1):17–40. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Li YS, Reid CN, McHale AP. Enhancing ultrasound-mediated cell membrane permeabilisation (sonoporation) using a high frequency pulse regime and implications for ultrasound-aided cancer chemotherapy. Cancer Lett. 2008;266(2):156–162. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.02.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kamimura K, Liu D. Physical approaches for nucleic acid delivery to liver. AAPS J. 2008;10(4):589–595. doi: 10.1208/s12248-008-9067-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Suzuki R, Takizawa T, Negishi Y, Utoguchi N, Maruyama K. Effective gene delivery with novel liposomal bubbles and ultrasonic destruction technology. Int J Pharm. 2008;354(12):49–55. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2007.10.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Deng CX. In: Therapeutic Ultrasound: Mechanisms to Applications. Frenkel V, editor. Nova Science Publishers; 2009. [in press] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Newman CM, Bettinger T. Gene therapy progress and prospects: ultrasound for gene transfer. Gene Ther. 2007;14(6):465–475. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3302925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Li YS, Davidson E, Reid CN, McHale AP. Optimising ultrasound-mediated gene transfer (sonoporation) in vitro and prolonged expression of a transgene in vivo: potential applications for gene therapy of cancer. Cancer Lett. 2009;273(1):62–69. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.07.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Campbell P, Prausnitz MR. Future directions for therapeutic ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007;33(4):657. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.11.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Prentice P, Cuschieri A, Dholakia K, Prausnitz M, Campbell P. Membrane disruption by optically controlled microbubble cavitation. Nature Physics. 2005;1(2):107–110. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Okada K, Kudo N, Niwa K, Yamamoto K. A basic study on sonoporation with microbubbles exposed to pulsed ultrasound. J Med Ultrasonics. 2005;32:3–11. doi: 10.1007/s10396-005-0031-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hallow DM, Mahajan AD, McCutchen TE, Prausnitz MR. Measurement and correlation of acoustic cavitation with cellular bioeffects. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2006;32(7):1111–1122. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zhou Y, Cui J, Deng CX. Dynamics of sonoporation correlated with acoustic cavitation activities. Biophys J. 2008;94(7):L51–53. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.107.125617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.van Wamel A, Kooiman K, Harteveld M, Emmer M, ten Cate FJ, Versluis M, de Jong N. Vibrating microbubbles poking individual cells: drug transfer into cells via sonoporation. J Control Release. 2006;112(2):149–155. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Forbes MM, Steinberg RL, O'Brien J, W. D. Examination of intertial cavitation of Optison in producing sonoporation of Chinese hamster ovary cells. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2008;34:2009–2018. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.05.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ferrara K, Pollard R, Borden M. Ultrasound microbubble contrast agents: fundamentals and application to gene and drug delivery. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2007;9:415–447. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.8.061505.095852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hernot S, Klibanov AL. Microbubbles in ultrasound-triggered drug and gene delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008;60(10):1153–1166. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2008.03.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Postema M, van Wamel A, Lancee CT, de Jong N. Ultrasound-induced encapsulated microbubble phenomena. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2004;30(6):827–840. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2004.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ohl CD, Arora M, Ikink R, de Jong N, Versluis M, Delius M, Lohse D. Sonoporation from jetting cavitation bubbles. Biophys J. 2006;91(11):4285–4295. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.105.075366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wu J. Shear stress in cells generated by ultrasound. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2007;93(13):363–373. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2006.07.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.VanBavel E. Effects of shear stress on endothelial cells: possible relevance for ultrasound applications. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2007;93(13):374–383. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2006.07.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Rosenthal I, Sostaric JZ, Riesz P. Sonodynamic therapy--a review of the synergistic effects of drugs and ultrasound. Ultrason Sonochem. 2004;11(6):349–363. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2004.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Juffermans LJ, Dijkmans PA, Musters RJ, Visser CA, Kamp O. Transient permeabilization of cell membranes by ultrasound-exposed microbubbles is related to formation of hydrogen peroxide. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006;291(4):H1595–1601. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01120.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Okada K, Kudo N, Kondo T, Yamamoto K. Contributions of mechanical and sonochemical effects to cell membrane damage induced by single-shot pulsed ultrasound with adjacent microbubbles. J Med Ultrason. 2008;35(4):169–176. doi: 10.1007/s10396-008-0192-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Tsukamoto A, Yasui N, Watanabe Y, Furukawa K, Ushida T. In: Sixth IASTED International Conference. Hierlemann A, editor. Vol. 601. Acta Press; Innsbruck, Austria: 2008. pp. 334–337. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kumon RE, Aehle M, Sabens D, Parikh P, Kourennyi D, Deng CX. Ultrasound-induced calcium oscillations and waves in Chinese hamster ovary cells in the presence of microbubbles. Biophys J. 2007 doi: 10.1529/biophysj.107.113365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kumon RE, Aehle M, Sabens D, Parikh P, Han YW, Kourennyi D, Deng CX. Spatiotemporal effects of sonoporation measured by real-Time calcium imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009;35:494–506. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.09.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Grynkiewicz G, Poenie M, Tsien RY. A new generation of Ca2+ indicators with greatly improved fluorescence properties. J Biol Chem. 1985;260(6):3440–3450. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hong SJ. Mechanism of endothelin-1-induced cytosolic Ca2+ mobility in cultured H9c2 myocardiac ventricular cells. Cell Signal. 2002;14(10):811–817. doi: 10.1016/s0898-6568(02)00020-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Tsien RY, Harootunian AT. Practical design criteria for a dynamic ratio imaging system. Cell Calcium. 1990;11(23):93–109. doi: 10.1016/0143-4160(90)90063-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kinoshita M, Hynynen K. Key factors that affect sonoporation efficiency in in vitro settings: the importance of standing wave in sonoporation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007;359(4):860–865. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.05.153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Steinhardt RA, Bi G, Alderton JM. Cell membrane resealing by a vesicular mechanism similar to neurotransmitter release. Science. 1994;263(5145):390–393. doi: 10.1126/science.7904084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Togo T, Alderton JM, Bi GQ, Steinhardt RA. The mechanism of facilitated cell membrane resealing. J Cell Sci. 1999;112(Pt 5):719–731. doi: 10.1242/jcs.112.5.719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Togo T, Krasieva TB, Steinhardt RA. A decrease in membrane tension precedes successful cell-membrane repair. Mol Biol Cell. 2000;11(12):4339–4346. doi: 10.1091/mbc.11.12.4339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sukhorukov VL, Djuzenova CS, Frank H, Arnold WM, Zimmermann U. Electropermeabilization and fluorescent tracer exchange: the role of whole-cell capacitance. Cytometry. 1995;21(3):230–240. doi: 10.1002/cyto.990210303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Djuzenova CS, Zimmermann U, Frank H, Sukhorukov VL, Richter E, Fuhr G. Effect of medium conductivity and composition on the uptake of propidium iodide into electropermeabilized myeloma cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1996;1284(2):143–152. doi: 10.1016/s0005-2736(96)00119-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kudo N, Okada K, Yamamoto K. Sonoporation by single-shot pulsed ultrasound with microbubbles adjacent to cells. Biophys J. 2009;96(12):4866–4876. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.02.072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Honda H, Kondo T, Zhao QL, Feril LB, Jr., Kitagawa H. Role of intracellular calcium ions and reactive oxygen species in apoptosis induced by ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2004;30(5):683–692. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2004.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Juffermans LJ, Kamp O, Dijkmans PA, Visser CA, Musters RJ. Low-intensity ultrasound-exposed microbubbles provoke local hyperpolarization of the cell membrane via activation of BK(Ca) channels. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2008;34(3):502–508. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2007.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Boitano S, Dirksen ER, Sanderson MJ. Intercellular propagation of calcium waves mediated by inositol trisphosphate. Science. 1992;258(5080):292–295. doi: 10.1126/science.1411526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Sauer H, Hescheler J, Wartenberg M. Mechanical strain-induced Ca2+ waves are propagated via ATP release and purinergic receptor activation. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2000;279(2):C295–307. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.2000.279.2.C295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Meijering BD, Juffermans LJ, van Wamel A, Henning RH, Zuhorn IS, Emmer M, Versteilen AM, Paulus WJ, van Gilst WH, Kooiman K, de Jong N, Musters RJ, Deelman LE, Kamp O. Ultrasound and microbubble-targeted delivery of macromolecules is regulated by induction of endocytosis and pore formation. Circ Res. 2009;104(5):679–687. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.183806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Ross JP, Cai X, Chiu JF, Yang J, Wu J. Optical and atomic force microscopic studies on sonoporation. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002;111(3):1161–1164. doi: 10.1121/1.1448340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Mehier-Humbert S, Bettinger T, Yan F, Guy RH. Plasma membrane poration induced by ultrasound exposure: implication for drug delivery. J Control Release. 2005;104(1):213–222. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Schlicher RK, Radhakrishna H, Tolentino TP, Apkarian RP, Zarnitsyn V, Prausnitz MR. Mechanism of intracellular delivery by acoustic cavitation. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2006;32(6):915–924. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.02.1416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Duvshani-Eshet M, Baruch L, Kesselman E, Shimoni E, Machluf M. Therapeutic ultrasound-mediated DNA to cell and nucleus: bioeffects revealed by confocal and atomic force microscopy. Gene Ther. 2006;13(2):163–172. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3302642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Duvshani-Eshet M, Adam D, Machluf M. The effects of albumin-coated microbubbles in DNA delivery mediated by therapeutic ultrasound. J Control Release. 2006;112(2):156–166. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Yang F, Gu N, Chen D, Xi X, Zhang D, Li Y, Wu J. Experimental study on cell self-sealing during sonoporation. J Control Release. 2008;131(3):205–210. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2008.07.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Tran TA, Roger S, Le Guennec JY, Tranquart F, Bouakaz A. Effect of ultrasound-activated microbubbles on the cell electrophysiological properties. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007;33(1):158–163. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.07.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Tran TA, Le Guennec JY, Bougnoux P, Tranquart F, Bouakaz A. Characterization of cell membrane response to ultrasound activated microbubbles. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2008;55(1):43–49. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2008.615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Tran TA, Le Guennec JY, Babuty D, Bougnoux P, Tranquart F, Bouakaz A. On the Mechanisms of Ultrasound Contrast Agents-Induced Arrhythmias. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009 doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.11.015. (in press) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.van Der Wouw PA, Brauns AC, Bailey SE, Powers JE, Wilde AA. Premature ventricular contractions during triggered imaging with ultrasound contrast. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2000;13(4):288–294. doi: 10.1067/mje.2000.103865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Chapman S, Windle J, Xie F, McGrain A, Porter TR. Incidence of cardiac arrhythmias with therapeutic versus diagnostic ultrasound and intravenous microbubbles. J Ultrasound Med. 2005;24(8):1099–1107. doi: 10.7863/jum.2005.24.8.1099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Dalecki D, Rota C, Raeman CH, Child SZ. Premature cardiac contractions produced by ultrasound and microbubble contrast agents in mice. Acoust. Res. Lett. Online (ARLO) 2005;6:221–226. [Google Scholar]
- 62.ter Keurs HE, Wakayama Y, Sugai Y, Price G, Kagaya Y, Boyden PA, Miura M, Stuyvers BD. Role of sarcomere mechanics and Ca2+ overload in Ca2+ waves and arrhythmias in rat cardiac muscle. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1080:248–267. doi: 10.1196/annals.1380.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Chen PS, Tan AY. Autonomic nerve activity and atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2007;4(3 Suppl):S61–64. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2006.12.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Dibb KM, Graham HK, Venetucci LA, Eisner DA, Trafford AW. Analysis of cellular calcium fluxes in cardiac muscle to understand calcium homeostasis in the heart. Cell Calcium. 2007;42(45):503–512. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2007.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Stuyvers BD, Boyden PA, ter Keurs HE. Calcium waves: physiological relevance in cardiac function. Circ Res. 2000;86(10):1016–1018. doi: 10.1161/01.res.86.10.1016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Honjo H, Boyett MR, Niwa R, Inada S, Yamamoto M, Mitsui K, Horiuchi T, Shibata N, Kamiya K, Kodama I. Pacing-induced spontaneous activity in myocardial sleeves of pulmonary veins after treatment with ryanodine. Circulation. 2003;107(14):1937–1943. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000062645.38670.BD. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Chou CC, Nihei M, Zhou S, Tan A, Kawase A, Macias ES, Fishbein MC, Lin SF, Chen PS. Intracellular calcium dynamics and anisotropic reentry in isolated canine pulmonary veins and left atrium. Circulation. 2005;111(22):2889–2897. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.498758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Huang JB, Kindzelskii AL, Clark AJ, Petty HR. Identification of channels promoting calcium spikes and waves in HT1080 tumor cells: their apparent roles in cell motility and invasion. Cancer Res. 2004;64(7):2482–2489. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-03-3501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Tyler WJ, Tufail Y, Finsterwald M, Tauchmann ML, Olson EJ, Majestic C. Remote excitation of neuronal circuits using low-intensity, low-frequency ultrasound. PLoS ONE. 2008;3(10):e3511. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]