Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1988 Nov;85(22):8703–8707. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.22.8703

M2 delta, a candidate for the structure lining the ionic channel of the nicotinic cholinergic receptor.

S Oiki 1, W Danho 1, V Madison 1, M Montal 1
PMCID: PMC282529  PMID: 2460876

Abstract

A synthetic 23-mer peptide that mimics the sequence of the putative transmembrane M2 segment of the Torpedo californica acetylcholine receptor (AcChoR) delta subunit--Glu-Lys-Met-Ser-Thr-Ala-Ile-Ser-Val-Leu-Leu-Ala-Gln-Ala-Val-Phe-Leu- Leu-Leu-Thr-Ser-Gln-Arg--forms discrete ionic channels in phosphatidylcholine bilayers. In contrast, a synthetic peptide that mimics the sequence of the putative M1 transmembrane segment of the Torpedo AcChoR delta subunit--Leu-Phe-Tyr-Val-Ile-Asn-Phe-Ile-Thr-Pro-Cys-Val-Leu-Ile-Ser-Phe- Leu-Ala-Ser-Leu-Ala-Phe-Tyr--does not form channels. The synthetic M2 delta channel peptide exhibits features that are characteristic of the authentic AcChoR channel, such as single channel conductances, discrimination of cations over anions, and channel lifetimes for open and closed states in the millisecond time range. Energetic considerations suggest that an aggregate of five amphipathic alpha-helices conforms the channel. Thus, the M2 segment may be a component of the AcChoR channel structure.

Full text

PDF

Images in this article

8706Image
on p.8706

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams D. J., Dwyer T. M., Hille B. The permeability of endplate channels to monovalent and divalent metal cations. J Gen Physiol. 1980 May;75(5):493–510. doi: 10.1085/jgp.75.5.493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Changeux J. P., Pinset C., Ribera A. B. Effects of chlorpromazine and phencyclidine on mouse C2 acetylcholine receptor kinetics. J Physiol. 1986 Sep;378:497–513. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp016232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chothia C., Levitt M., Richardson D. Helix to helix packing in proteins. J Mol Biol. 1981 Jan 5;145(1):215–250. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(81)90341-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chou P. Y., Fasman G. D. Prediction of the secondary structure of proteins from their amino acid sequence. Adv Enzymol Relat Areas Mol Biol. 1978;47:45–148. doi: 10.1002/9780470122921.ch2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Claudio T., Ballivet M., Patrick J., Heinemann S. Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences of Torpedo californica acetylcholine receptor gamma subunit. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Feb;80(4):1111–1115. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.4.1111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dani J. A., Eisenman G. Monovalent and divalent cation permeation in acetylcholine receptor channels. Ion transport related to structure. J Gen Physiol. 1987 Jun;89(6):959–983. doi: 10.1085/jgp.89.6.959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Devillers-Thiery A., Giraudat J., Bentaboulet M., Changeux J. P. Complete mRNA coding sequence of the acetylcholine binding alpha-subunit of Torpedo marmorata acetylcholine receptor: a model for the transmembrane organization of the polypeptide chain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Apr;80(7):2067–2071. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.7.2067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dwyer T. M., Adams D. J., Hille B. The permeability of the endplate channel to organic cations in frog muscle. J Gen Physiol. 1980 May;75(5):469–492. doi: 10.1085/jgp.75.5.469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Eisenberg D., Schwarz E., Komaromy M., Wall R. Analysis of membrane and surface protein sequences with the hydrophobic moment plot. J Mol Biol. 1984 Oct 15;179(1):125–142. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90309-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Finer-Moore J., Stroud R. M. Amphipathic analysis and possible formation of the ion channel in an acetylcholine receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Jan;81(1):155–159. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.1.155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Garnier J., Osguthorpe D. J., Robson B. Analysis of the accuracy and implications of simple methods for predicting the secondary structure of globular proteins. J Mol Biol. 1978 Mar 25;120(1):97–120. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(78)90297-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Giraudat J., Dennis M., Heidmann T., Chang J. Y., Changeux J. P. Structure of the high-affinity binding site for noncompetitive blockers of the acetylcholine receptor: serine-262 of the delta subunit is labeled by [3H]chlorpromazine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Apr;83(8):2719–2723. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.8.2719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Greenblatt R. E., Blatt Y., Montal M. The structure of the voltage-sensitive sodium channel. Inferences derived from computer-aided analysis of the Electrophorus electricus channel primary structure. FEBS Lett. 1985 Dec 2;193(2):125–134. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(85)80136-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Guy H. R. A structural model of the acetylcholine receptor channel based on partition energy and helix packing calculations. Biophys J. 1984 Jan;45(1):249–261. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(84)84152-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Huang L. Y., Catterall W. A., Ehrenstein G. Selectivity of cations and nonelectrolytes for acetylcholine-activated channels in cultured muscle cells. J Gen Physiol. 1978 Apr;71(4):397–410. doi: 10.1085/jgp.71.4.397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hucho F., Oberthür W., Lottspeich F. The ion channel of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor is formed by the homologous helices M II of the receptor subunits. FEBS Lett. 1986 Sep 1;205(1):137–142. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(86)80881-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Imoto K., Methfessel C., Sakmann B., Mishina M., Mori Y., Konno T., Fukuda K., Kurasaki M., Bujo H., Fujita Y. Location of a delta-subunit region determining ion transport through the acetylcholine receptor channel. Nature. 1986 Dec 18;324(6098):670–674. doi: 10.1038/324670a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kubo T., Noda M., Takai T., Tanabe T., Kayano T., Shimizu S., Tanaka K., Takahashi H., Hirose T., Inayama S. Primary structure of delta subunit precursor of calf muscle acetylcholine receptor deduced from cDNA sequence. Eur J Biochem. 1985 May 15;149(1):5–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1985.tb08885.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. LaPolla R. J., Mayne K. M., Davidson N. Isolation and characterization of a cDNA clone for the complete protein coding region of the delta subunit of the mouse acetylcholine receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Dec;81(24):7970–7974. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.24.7970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Labarca P., Rice J. A., Fredkin D. R., Montal M. Kinetic analysis of channel gating. Application to the cholinergic receptor channel and the chloride channel from Torpedo californica. Biophys J. 1985 Apr;47(4):469–478. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(85)83939-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lear J. D., Wasserman Z. R., DeGrado W. F. Synthetic amphiphilic peptide models for protein ion channels. Science. 1988 May 27;240(4856):1177–1181. doi: 10.1126/science.2453923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lewis C. A., Stevens C. F. Acetylcholine receptor channel ionic selectivity: ions experience an aqueous environment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Oct;80(19):6110–6113. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.19.6110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Molle G., Dugast J. Y., Duclohier H., Daumas P., Heitz F., Spach G. Ionophore properties of a synthetic alpha-helical transmembrane fragment of the mitochondrial H+ ATP synthetase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Comparison with alamethicin. Biophys J. 1988 Feb;53(2):193–203. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(88)83081-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Nef P., Mauron A., Stalder R., Alliod C., Ballivet M. Structure linkage, and sequence of the two genes encoding the delta and gamma subunits of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Dec;81(24):7975–7979. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.24.7975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Noda M., Takahashi H., Tanabe T., Toyosato M., Furutani Y., Hirose T., Asai M., Inayama S., Miyata T., Numa S. Primary structure of alpha-subunit precursor of Torpedo californica acetylcholine receptor deduced from cDNA sequence. Nature. 1982 Oct 28;299(5886):793–797. doi: 10.1038/299793a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Noda M., Takahashi H., Tanabe T., Toyosato M., Kikyotani S., Furutani Y., Hirose T., Takashima H., Inayama S., Miyata T. Structural homology of Torpedo californica acetylcholine receptor subunits. Nature. 1983 Apr 7;302(5908):528–532. doi: 10.1038/302528a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Noda M., Takahashi H., Tanabe T., Toyosato M., Kikyotani S., Hirose T., Asai M., Takashima H., Inayama S., Miyata T. Primary structures of beta- and delta-subunit precursors of Torpedo californica acetylcholine receptor deduced from cDNA sequences. Nature. 1983 Jan 20;301(5897):251–255. doi: 10.1038/301251a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Oberthür W., Hucho F. Photoaffinity labeling of functional states of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. J Protein Chem. 1988 Apr;7(2):141–150. doi: 10.1007/BF01025243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Oiki S., Danho W., Montal M. Channel protein engineering: synthetic 22-mer peptide from the primary structure of the voltage-sensitive sodium channel forms ionic channels in lipid bilayers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Apr;85(7):2393–2397. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.7.2393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ratnam M., Nguyen D. L., Rivier J., Sargent P. B., Lindstrom J. Transmembrane topography of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor: immunochemical tests contradict theoretical predictions based on hydrophobicity profiles. Biochemistry. 1986 May 6;25(9):2633–2643. doi: 10.1021/bi00357a052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Reynolds J. A., Karlin A. Molecular weight in detergent solution of acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo californica. Biochemistry. 1978 May 30;17(11):2035–2038. doi: 10.1021/bi00604a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Schiffer M., Edmundson A. B. Use of helical wheels to represent the structures of proteins and to identify segments with helical potential. Biophys J. 1967 Mar;7(2):121–135. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(67)86579-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Weber P. C., Salemme F. R. Structural and functional diversity in 4-alpha-helical proteins. Nature. 1980 Sep 4;287(5777):82–84. doi: 10.1038/287082a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES