Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1988 Dec;85(23):8973–8977. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.23.8973

Promoters largely determine the efficiency of repressor action.

M Lanzer 1, H Bujard 1
PMCID: PMC282639  PMID: 3057497

Abstract

Operator sequence and repressor protein regulate the activity of the lac promoter over a greater than 1000-fold range. Combinations of the lac operator with other promoter sequences, however, differ vastly in the level of repression. The data presented show that the extent of repression is determined largely by the rates of complex formation of the competing systems operator-repressor and promoter-RNA polymerase and by the rate at which RNA polymerase clears the promoter. Moreover, up to 70-fold differences in the level of repression were found when the operator was placed in different positions within the promoter sequence. A kinetic model is proposed that explains the observed effects and that allows predictions on promoters controlled by negatively acting elements.

Full text

PDF

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beckwith J., Grodzicker T., Arditti R. Evidence for two sites in the lac promoter region. J Mol Biol. 1972 Aug 14;69(1):155–160. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(72)90031-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bennett G. N., Yanofsky C. Sequence analysis of operator constitutive mutants of the tryptophan operon of Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 1978 May 15;121(2):179–192. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(78)80004-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Besse M., von Wilcken-Bergmann B., Müller-Hill B. Synthetic lac operator mediates repression through lac repressor when introduced upstream and downstream from lac promoter. EMBO J. 1986 Jun;5(6):1377–1381. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04370.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brunner M., Bujard H. Promoter recognition and promoter strength in the Escherichia coli system. EMBO J. 1987 Oct;6(10):3139–3144. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02624.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Burgess R. R., Jendrisak J. J. A procedure for the rapid, large-scall purification of Escherichia coli DNA-dependent RNA polymerase involving Polymin P precipitation and DNA-cellulose chromatography. Biochemistry. 1975 Oct 21;14(21):4634–4638. doi: 10.1021/bi00692a011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Carpousis A. J., Stefano J. E., Gralla J. D. 5' nucleotide heterogeneity and altered initiation of transcription at mutant lac promoters. J Mol Biol. 1982 Jun 5;157(4):619–633. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90502-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Deuschle U., Kammerer W., Gentz R., Bujard H. Promoters of Escherichia coli: a hierarchy of in vivo strength indicates alternate structures. EMBO J. 1986 Nov;5(11):2987–2994. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04596.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gilbert W., Müller-Hill B. Isolation of the lac repressor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1966 Dec;56(6):1891–1898. doi: 10.1073/pnas.56.6.1891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. JACOB F., MONOD J. Genetic regulatory mechanisms in the synthesis of proteins. J Mol Biol. 1961 Jun;3:318–356. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(61)80072-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jobe A., Sadler J. R., Bourgeois S. lac Repressor-operator interaction. IX. The binding of lac repressor to operators containing Oc mutations. J Mol Biol. 1974 May 15;85(2):231–248. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(74)90362-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Johnson A. D., Pabo C. O., Sauer R. T. Bacteriophage lambda repressor and cro protein: interactions with operator DNA. Methods Enzymol. 1980;65(1):839–856. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(80)65078-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kammerer W., Deuschle U., Gentz R., Bujard H. Functional dissection of Escherichia coli promoters: information in the transcribed region is involved in late steps of the overall process. EMBO J. 1986 Nov;5(11):2995–3000. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04597.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Knaus R., Bujard H. PL of coliphage lambda: an alternative solution for an efficient promoter. EMBO J. 1988 Sep;7(9):2919–2923. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03150.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lee N. L., Gielow W. O., Wallace R. G. Mechanism of araC autoregulation and the domains of two overlapping promoters, Pc and PBAD, in the L-arabinose regulatory region of Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Feb;78(2):752–756. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.2.752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Malan T. P., Kolb A., Buc H., McClure W. R. Mechanism of CRP-cAMP activation of lac operon transcription initiation activation of the P1 promoter. J Mol Biol. 1984 Dec 25;180(4):881–909. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90262-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Menendez M., Kolb A., Buc H. A new target for CRP action at the malT promoter. EMBO J. 1987 Dec 20;6(13):4227–4234. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02771.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Schmitz A., Galas D. J. The interaction of RNA polymerase and lac repressor with the lac control region. Nucleic Acids Res. 1979 Jan;6(1):111–137. doi: 10.1093/nar/6.1.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Straney S. B., Crothers D. M. Lac repressor is a transient gene-activating protein. Cell. 1987 Dec 4;51(5):699–707. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90093-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Winter R. B., Berg O. G., von Hippel P. H. Diffusion-driven mechanisms of protein translocation on nucleic acids. 3. The Escherichia coli lac repressor--operator interaction: kinetic measurements and conclusions. Biochemistry. 1981 Nov 24;20(24):6961–6977. doi: 10.1021/bi00527a030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. de Boer H. A., Comstock L. J., Vasser M. The tac promoter: a functional hybrid derived from the trp and lac promoters. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Jan;80(1):21–25. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.1.21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES