Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Feb 19.
Published in final edited form as: Org Lett. 2010 Feb 19;12(4):816–819. doi: 10.1021/ol9028918

Arylchlorogermanes/TBAF/“Moist” Toluene. A Promising Combination for Pd-Catalyzed Germyl-Stille Cross-Coupling

Zun-Ting Zhang 1,, Jean-Philippe Pitteloud 1, Laura Cabrera 1, Yong Liang 1, Myrdich Toribio 1, Stanislaw F Wnuk 1,*
PMCID: PMC2827299  NIHMSID: NIHMS173192  PMID: 20092358

Abstract

graphic file with name nihms173192u1.jpg

The trichlorophenyl,- dichlorodiphenyl,- and chlorotriphenylgermanes undergo Pd-catalyzed cross-couplings with aryl bromides and iodides in the presence of TBAF in toluene with addition of the measured amount of water. One chloride ligand on the Ge center allows efficient activation by fluoride to promote transfer of one, two or three phenyl groups from the organogermane precursors.


The Pd-catalyzed cross-coupling of organogermanes has thus far received much less attention1 than the couplings involving organostannanes and organosilanes.2 This is due to the lower reactivity of tetracoordinated organogermanium species, the less developed syntheses of vinyl/aryl germanyl derivatives, and the higher cost of germanium relative to silicon.3 The carbagermatranes 1, with internal coordination of nitrogen to germanium, were the first examples of reactive tetracoordinated germanes applied to Pd-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions with aryl bromides4 (Figure 1). The oxagermatranes 2 were found to be more efficient than carbagermatranes and triethoxygermanes.5,6 Fluoride-promoted couplings with aryltri(2-furyl)germanes7 and NaOH-activated couplings with arylgermanium trichlorides8 or their hydrolyzed and stable sesquioxide alternatives9 were also reported. The bis(2-naphthylmethyl)arylgermanes 3 were developed as photochemically activated arylgermanes for the synthesis of biaryls.10,11 The vinyl tris(trimethylsilyl)germanes 4 were employed as transmetalation reagents in “ligand- and fluoride-free” coupling reactions with halides under oxidative conditions (H2O2).12,13 The (α-fluoro)vinyl germanes 5 gave access to fluoroalkenes14 although application of (α-fluoro)vinyl stannanes and silanes to couplings has had limited success.15,16 Recently, couplings of vinyltributylgermanes with aryl halides were found to occur more efficiently under Heck than Stille conditions to give preferentially Z-alkenes.17

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Organogermanes utilized in Pd-catalyzed couplings.

In general, couplings with organogermanes appear to be promoted by: (i) activation of germanium by internal coordination/chelation,4,5,17 (ii) formation of the hypervalent species with germanium-oxygen bonds;7-9,13 and (iii) the presence of two labile heteroatom ligands (e.g. Cl or F) on Ge atom.10,11 Herein, we report that chlorophenylgermanes with at least one labile chloride ligand are activated by fluoride in “moist” toluene to allow efficient transfer of up to three phenyl groups from germane precursors during Pd-catalyzed coupling reactions with aryl halides.

Treatment of PhGeMe2Cl 6 with 1-iodonaphthalene in the presence of tetrabutylammonium fluoride (TBAF) and tris(dibenzylideneacetone)dipalladium(0) [Pd2(dba)3] in toluene gave cross-coupling product 7a in addition to the binaphthyl homocoupling byproduct 8a (Table 1). The amount of TBAF was found to be crucial for the successful coupling (entries 1-5). At least 4 equiv of TBAF were required to produce 7a in maximum yield. Other Pd catalysts afforded 7a in lower yields and a decreased ratio of 7a to 8a (entries 6-7). Replacing 1M TBAF/THF solution with neat TBAF•3H2O also gave product 7a (entry 8). Coupling in the presence of Me4NF, CsF or NH4F instead of TBAF failed to produce 7a. The reaction also proceeded successfully at 80 oC (80%; 10:1) and 110 °C (93%; 10:1) as well as at reflux in benzene (90%; 10:1), requiring 12 h for the best results (entry 4).

Table 1.

Effect of various reaction parameters on the efficiency of cross-coupling of chlorodimethylgermane 6 with 1-iodonaphthalenea

graphic file with name nihms173192u2.jpg

entry Pd TBAFb 7a [yield(%)]c ratio (7a:8a)
1 Pd2(dba)3 1.0 19 1:1
2 Pd2(dba)3 2.0 61 9:1
3 Pd2(dba)3 3.0 79 17:1
4 Pd2(dba)3 4.0 93d,e 20:1
5 Pd2(dba)3 5.0 94 12:1
6 Pd(OAc)2 4.0 58 5:2
7 Pd(PPh3)4 4.0 5 2:1
8 Pd2(dba)3 4.0f 70 6:1
a

Couplings were performed on 0.14 mmol scale of 6 (0.04 M) with 1.1 equiv of iodonaphthalene and 0.09 equiv of Pd catalyst.

b

Commercial 1M THF solution containing 5% of water, unless otherwise noted.

c

Determined by GC-MS of the crude reaction mixture.

d

Isolated yield.

e

After 4 h, 49% (8:1); 8 h, 78% (15:1).

f

With TBAF•3H2O.

Toluene was the obvious solvent choice since attempts in DMSO (5%, 110 °C) or THF at reflux (0%) or dioxane at reflux (59%; 3:1) failed or afforded 7a in lower yields. Higher yield for the coupling in dioxane than in THF may be attributable to the increased temperature of the reaction as well the difference in dielectric constant [7.58 for THF as compared to dioxane (2.21) and toluene (2.15)].18 Bases such as NaOH [Pd(OAc)2; dioxane/H2O, 2:1] or KOSiMe3 [Pd2(dba)3, toluene)], instead of TBAF, failed or were less efficient in promoting couplings.

We next examined couplings of Ph2GeCl2 9 or Ph3GeCl 10 with iodonaphthalene. Treatment of 9 with 1.1 equiv of iodide and 7 equiv of TBAF gave 7a (Table 2, entry 1). Coupling of 9 with 2.2 equiv of iodonaphthalene also resulted in total consumption of iodide to afford 7a and 8a (entry 2). Interestingly, couplings in toluene with addition of the measured amount of water (1 M TBAF/THF//H2O; ∼1:5 M/M) gave a higher yield of 7a with a superior ratio of 7a:8a (entries 3 vs 1 and 4 vs 2). An investigation of the coupling reactions with different amounts of water, revealed that addition of 100 μL of H2O (∼40 equiv) gave optimal yields (entry 10). Two phenyl groups were efficiently transferred in the presence of excess iodide (e.g., 89%, entry 4; yield is based upon two phenyl groups transferring from the chlorogermane reagent 9). It is worth noting that halides are often used in couplings as limiting reagents to reduce formation of homocoupling byproducts and the yields are based on the halide components unlike herein.

Table 2.

Cross-coupling of chlorophenylgermanes 9 and 10 with 1-iodonaphthalene promoted by TBAF and TBAF/H2O

graphic file with name nihms173192u3.jpg

entry germane RX (equiv) methoda 7a [yield(%)]b ratio (7a:8a)
1 9 1.1 A 32c (30) 2.7:1
2 9 2.2 A 58 (55) 2.2:1
3 9 1.1 B 45 (42) 23:1
4 9 2.2 B 91 (89) 10:1
5 10 1.1 A 13d (12) 1:1.4
6 10 2.2 A 37 (35) 2:1
7 10 3.3 A 40 (39) 1.2:1
8 10 1.1 B 18 (17) 2.5:1
9 10 2.2 B 60 (60) 9:1
10 10 3.3 B 95e (88) 13:1
a

Method A: Couplings were performed on 0.14 mmol scale of germane (0.04 M) with Pd2(dba)3 (0.09 equiv) and 7 equiv of TBAF (1M/THF). Method B: as in Method A with addition of H2O (100 μL).

b

Based upon transferring two phenyl groups from 9 or three phenyl groups from 10. Determined by GC-MS of the crude reaction mixture (isolated yields in parenthesis).

c

26% and 31% with 6 and 8 equiv. of TBAF.

d

11% and 14% with 6 and 8 equiv of TBAF.

e

57% (3.8:1) with 50 μL H2O; 82% (7:1) with 150 μL H2O.

Couplings of 10 with 1.1, 2.2 or 3.3 equiv of iodonaphthalene proceeded with efficient transfer of up to three phenyl groups to give 7a (entries 5-10). [See supporting information for the GC/MS of the crude reaction mixture between 9 or 10 with iodonaphthalene (entries 4 and 10).] Again, yields and 7a:8a ratios increased when wet toluene was used. Atom-efficient Stille cross-couplings of Ar4Sn with aryl halides, where all four substituents on tin participate in the carbon-carbon bond formation, are known.19,20 Also, vinylpolysiloxanes were showed to transfer each of their vinyl groups during Pd-catalyzed couplings with aryl and alkenyl iodides in the presence of TBAF.21 However, attempts to induce multiple transfer of the phenyl group during fluoride-promoted couplings of (allyl)XPh4-XSi (x = 1 or 2) with aryl halides failed.22

Couplings of 9 or 10 with other aryl, alkenyl, and heterocyclic iodides and bromides (using 2.2 or 3.3 equiv of halides, respectively) promoted by TBAF/H2O are presented in Table 3 (entries 1-14). Reactions of germanes 9 or 10 with reactive 4-iodoacetophenone produced 7d in low yields in addition to large quantities of the reductive homocoupling byproduct 8d. However, coupling of the less reactive 4-bromoacetophenone at higher temperature (115 °C) resulted in better yields and improved 7d:8d ratios (entries 5 vs 4 and 12 vs 11). Treatment of PhGeCl3 11 with halides and TBAF/toluene or wet toluene also afforded coupling products 7 (entry 15-22), although it has been reported that fluoride ion did not promote the couplings of PhGeCl3 with aryl halides.8 It appears that reactivity of the chlorogermanes increases with the number of halogen ligands on the Ge center (10 < 9 < 11). As expected,7 coupling attempts with Ph4Ge failed reinforcing the needs for at least one labile heteroatom ligand at the Ge center. The necessity of two halogen ligands had been proposed for nucleophilic activation by F- or OH- ions.11

Table 3.

Cross-coupling of chlorogermanes 9-11 with halidesa

graphic file with name nihms173192u4.jpg

entry germane halide product yield (%)b ratio(7:8)
1 9 1-Bromonaphthalenec 7a 54 (48) 7.2:1
2 9 (4)CH3OPhI 7b 86d (85) 9.8:1
3 9 (3)CF3PhI 7c 70 (68) 3.4:1
4 9 (4)CH3COPhI 7d 12 (10) 3:2
5 9 (4)CH3COPhBr 7d 26d (21) 99:1
6 9 PhCH=CHBr 7e 8e,g (5) 1:3
7 9 2-Iodo-5-Me-thiophene 7f 13e (6) 2:3
8 10 1-Bromonaphthalene 7a 24 1.4:1
9 10 (4)CH3OPhI 7b 48f (40) 4:1
10 10 (3)CF3PhI 7c 48 3:2
11 10 (4)CH3COPhI 7d 3 1:20
12 10 (4)CH3COPhBr 7d 24d 1:1
13 10 PhCH=CHBr 7e 3g 1:8
14 10 2-Iodo-5-Me-thiophene 7f 3g 2:3
15 11 1-Iodonaphthalene 7a 99h (96) 35:1
16 11 1-Bromonaphthalene 7a 90g (82) 99:1
17 11 (4)CH3OPhI 7b 88g (80) 10:1
18 11 (3)CF3PhI 7c 93 (87) 9:1
19 11 (4)CH3COPhI 7d 99 (88) 99:1
20 11 (4)CH3COPhBr 7d 91 99:1
21 11 PhCH=CHBr 7e 30e,g (28) 3:1
22 11 2-Iodo-5-Me-thiophene 7f 48e,g (35) 3:2
a

Couplings were performed on 0.14 mmol scale of germanes (0.04 M) with 0.09 equiv of Pd catalyst, 1.1 (11), 2.2 (9) or 3.3 (10) equiv of halides and TBAF/(1 M/THF, 7 equiv)/water (100 μL).

b

Based upon transferring of one, two or three phenyl groups from 11, 9 or 10, respectively. Determined by GC-MS of the crude reaction mixture (isolated yields in parenthesis).

c

Coupling with 1-chloronaphthalene failed.

d

115 °C.

e

Biphenyl was also produced (∼25-50%).

f

28 h.

g

Without H2O.

h

88% (81%, 19:1) without H2O.

TBAF most likely facilitates the coupling by generating the more reactive hypervalent fluorogermanium species. It is viable that the germanium species with extra halogen ligands formed after each transmetalation cycle is rendered more reactive to efficiently transfer a second or third phenyl group from the Ge atom. Reactivity of these hypervalent Ge species could be superior in toluene solvent due to the weak solvation. Water might play multiple roles in enhancing the efficiency of the couplings as was found with organosilanes, including the formation of the reactive hydroxypalladium intermediates.1,23,24 For example, the hydration level of Cs2CO3 and CsOH were found to be a decisive factor during the coupling of the aryl(dimethyl)silanols with aryl halides.25 Also, Denmark and Sweis showed that water was a critical additive in the fluoride promoted reaction of alkenylsilanols with phenyl nonaflate.1,26 In addition, the fluorination of the bulky chlorogermanes may be accelerated by the addition of water as was reported for hindered chlorosilanes.27

Mixing of 6 with TBAF in benzene-d6 at ambient temperature showed the formation of a distinctive septet at δ -194.3 (3JF-H ∼ 6.0 Hz) for PhGeMe2F in agreement with the literature report for similar compounds.11 Prolonged time and/or heating promoted equilibration with perfluorinated species [δ -150.8 (br s), -126.4 (br s)] analogous to the reported hypervalent tin28-30 and silicon31-33 species, which were successfully utilized in cross-coupling reactions.

We have demonstrated that arylchlorogermanes undergo Pd-catalyzed cross-couplings with aryl halides in the presence of TBAF in wet toluene. One chloride ligand on Ge center allows efficient activation by fluoride to promote transfer of up to three aryl groups from germane. The methodology shows that organogermanes can render a coupling efficiency comparable to the more established stannane and silane counterparts.

Supplementary Material

1_si_001

Acknowledgments

We thank NIGMS/NCI (1SC1CA138176) and the Oversea Scholarship Program of Shaanxi Normal University (ZTZ), FIU's Dissertation Year Fellowship (JPP) and MARC U*STAR (GM083688-02) (LC) for their support.

Footnotes

Supporting Information Available: General experimental details and GC/MS and NMR spectra. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

References

  • 1.Spivey AC, Gripton CJG, Hannah JP. Curr Org Synth. 2004;1:211–226. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.de Meijere A, Diederich F, editors. Metal-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim, Germany: 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Patai S, Rappoport Z, editors. The Chemistry of Organic Germanium, Tin and Lead Compounds. 1 & 2 John Wiley & Sons; Chichester, UK: 1995 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kosugi M, Tanji T, Tanaka Y, Yoshida A, Fugami K, Kameyama M, Migita T. J Organomet Chem. 1996;508:255–257. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Faller JW, Kultyshev RG. Organometallics. 2002;21:5911–5918. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Faller JW, Kultyshev RG, Parr J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003;44:451–453. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nakamura T, Kinoshita H, Shinokubo H, Oshima K. Org Lett. 2002;4:3165–3167. doi: 10.1021/ol026613t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Enokido T, Fugami K, Endo M, Kameyama M, Kosugi M. Adv Synth Catal. 2004;346:1685–1688. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Endo M, Fugami K, Enokido T, Sano H, Kosugi M. Adv Synth Catal. 2007;349:1025–1027. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Spivey AC, Tseng CC, Hannah JP, Gripton CJG, de Fraine P, Parr NJ, Scicinski JJ. Chem Comm. 2007:2926–2928. doi: 10.1039/b707517k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Spivey AC, Gripton CJG, Hannah JP, Tseng CC, Fraine PD, Parr NJ, Scicinski JJ. Appl Organometal Chem. 2007;21:572–589. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wnuk SF, Garcia PI, Jr, Wang Z. Org Lett. 2004;6:2047–2049. doi: 10.1021/ol049312n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wang Z, Wnuk SF. J Org Chem. 2005;70:3281–3284. doi: 10.1021/jo047773g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wang Z, Gonzalez A, Wnuk SF. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005;46:5313–5316. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chen C, Wilcoxen K, Zhu YF, Kim Ki, McCarthy JR. J Org Chem. 1999;64:3476–3482. doi: 10.1021/jo982200n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hanamoto T, Kobayashi T. J Org Chem. 2003;68:6354–6359. doi: 10.1021/jo030111r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Torres NM, Lavis JM, Maleczka RE., Jr Tetrahedron Lett. 2009;50:4407–4410. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Seganish WM, DeShong P. J Org Chem. 2004;69:1137–1143. doi: 10.1021/jo035309q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Fugami K, Fugami K, Ohnuma Sy, Kameyama M, Saotome T, Kosugi M. Synlett. 1999;1999:63–64. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhou WJ, Wang KH, Wang JX. J Org Chem. 2009;74:5599–5602. doi: 10.1021/jo9005206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Denmark SE, Wang Z. J Organomet Chem. 2001;624:372–375. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sahoo AK, Oda T, Nakao Y, Hiyama T. Adv Synth Catal. 2004;346:1715–1727. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Denmark SE, Sweis RF, Wehrli D. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:4865–4875. doi: 10.1021/ja037234d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Denmark SE, Sweis RF. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:4876–4882. doi: 10.1021/ja0372356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Denmark SE, Ober MH. Adv Synth Catal. 2004;346:1703–1714. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Denmark SE, Sweis RF. Org Lett. 2002;4:3771–3774. doi: 10.1021/ol026900x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lickiss PD, Lucas R. J Organomet Chem. 1996;510:167–172. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gingras M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991;32:7381–7384. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Garcia Martinez A, Osio Barcina J, Colorado Heras MdR, de Fresno Cerezo A. Organometallics. 2001;20:1020–1023. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Grasa GA, Nolan SP. Org Lett. 2001;3:119–122. doi: 10.1021/ol006827f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Pilcher AS, Ammon HL, DeShong P. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;117:5166–5167. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mowery ME, DeShong P. J Org Chem. 1999;64:3266–3270. doi: 10.1021/jo990072c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Handy CJ, Lam YF, DeShong P. J Org Chem. 2000;65:3542–3543. doi: 10.1021/jo991771s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1_si_001

RESOURCES