Abstract

A complex of commercial [Ir(OMe)(cod)]2 and 4,4-di-tert-butyl-2,2-bipyridine (dtbpy) catalyzes the Z-selective, dehydrative silylation of terminal alkenes, but not 1,2-disubstituted alkenes, with triethylsilane or benzyldimethylsilane in THF at 40 °C. Yields and Z-stereoselectivity were significantly improved by 2-norbornene, in contrast with other sacrificial alkenes. The reaction is compatible with many functional groups including epoxides, ketones, amides, alcohols, esters, halides, ketals and silanes. a,b-Unsaturated esters were unreactive. The reaction probably proceeds through a Heck-type mechanism.
Introduction
The unique reactivity profile1 of trialkylsilylalkenes (vinylsilanes) combined with their low environmental impact2 and distinctive physical properties,3 has led to ever-widening roles for them as synthetic intermediates4 and as building blocks in numerous material science/polymer applications.5 Accordingly, a variety of procedures are extant for the preparation of vinylsilanes, inter alia, additions of vinyllithiums or Grignard reagents to silyl electrophiles,6 Wittig/Peterson olefinations,7 alkyne hydrosilyation,8 and Suzuki cross-coupling.9,10 In more recent years, the direct silylation of alkenes mediated by transition metal catalysts,11 e.g., iron,12 cobalt,13 palladium,14 rhodium,15 ruthenium,16 iridium,17 and rhenium18 complexes, was introduced. Additionally, Kambe et al. reported the zirconocene catalyzed silylation of alkenes using chlorosilanes19 while Yorimitsu and Oshima developed an elegant silylation of terminal alkenes via Ni-catalyzed exchange with silacyclobutanes.20 However, there are some important limitations associated with the stoichiometric and catalytic reactions. The former involve (i) strongly basic or harsh reaction conditions, (ii) multi-step processes, and/or (iii) give modest yields; the latter require (i) high alkene to silane ratios, (ii) conjugated or polyolefinic substrates, (iii) non-commercial reagents, and/or (iv) are E-selective. Herein, we offer a high yield Z-selective C-H silylation of terminal alkenes utilizing an iridium-dtbpy complex promoted by 2-norborene (eq 1) and some insights into the parameters that influence stereoselectivity.
![]() |
(1) |
Results and Discussion
Motivated by our recent iridium-catalyzed C-H functionalization/silylation of heteroarenes and the mechanistic understanding gained therein,21 we sought to extend this methodology to the more challenging case of isolated alkenes.16,22 Initial attempts to silylate the model olefin 4-phenyl-1-butene 1 using [Ir(OMe)(cod)]2/4,4-di-tert-butyl-2,2-bipyridine (dtbpy) (cod = cycloocta-1,5-diene)23 and triethylsilane at either 80 °C or 40 °C in THF proved disappointing and gave rise to vinyl silane 2 in poor yield (Table 1, entries 1 and 2). The reversal of stereoselectivity towards the thermodynamically less favored Z-configuration at the lower temperature and the absence of aryl silylation, however, did not escape notice. Inclusion of mono- (entry 3), di- (entry 4), tri- (entry 5), and tetra-substituted (entry 6) olefins as sacrificial hydrogen repositories had little influence on the yield or stereoselectivity. In sharp contrast, 2-norbornene dramatically boosted yields (entries 7 and 8) and, in the latter case, the Z/E-ratio; at room temperature, the reaction was too sluggish to be useful (entry 9). Decreasing the amount of olefinic promoter and triethysilane resulted in a proportionate lessening of both conversion and Z-isomer (entry 10). Silylations also proceeded well in DME (entry 11), dioxane (entry 12), and even ether (entry 13), albeit with reduced stereoselectivity; toluene and dichloromethane were unsatisfactory (<5%). Commercial bicyclic (entries 14–16) and tricyclic (entry 17) promoters related to norbornene were less efficacious, except for a slight increase in the Z-selectivity in some instances. It is noteworthy that the dtbpy ligand also plays an important role by inhibiting the isomerization of olefin. Other similar ligands weren’t helpful (see Supporting Information).
TABLE 1.
Influence of promoters and reaction parameters on (Z)-selectivity and yield of 2a
![]() | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| entry | promoter | temp (°C) | solvent | yield (%)b | Z:Ec |
| 1 | none | 80 | THF | <10 | 5:95d |
| 2 | none | 40 | THF | 16 | 4:1 |
| 3 | ![]() |
40 | THF | <5 | nde |
| 4 | ![]() |
40 | THF | 16 | 4:1 |
| 5 | ![]() |
40 | THF | <5 | ndf |
| 6 | ![]() |
40 | THF | <5 | ndf |
| 7 | ![]() |
80 | THF | 91 | 2.5:1f |
| 8 | ![]() |
40 | THF | 92 | 9:1 |
| 9 | ![]() |
23 | THF | <5 | nde,f |
| 10 | ![]() |
40 | THF | 60 | 5:1g |
| 11 | ![]() |
40 | DME | 90 | 8:1 |
| 12 | ![]() |
40 | dioxane | 88 | 7:1 |
| 13 | ![]() |
40 | ether | 91 | 3:1 |
| 14 | ![]() |
40 | THF | 22 | 9:1 |
| 15 | ![]() |
40 | THF | 21 | 10:1 |
| 16 | ![]() |
40 | THF | 71 | 10:1 |
| 17 | ![]() |
40 | THF | 20 | 4:1 |
Reaction conditions: [Ir(OMe)(cod)]2 (5 mol%), dtbpy (10 mol%), promoter (3 equiv, if used) and Et3SiH (3 equiv) in THF for 2 h.
Combined yield.
Measured by crude1H NMR.
Conducted for 15 h.
nd = not determined.
Conducted for 24 h.
Using 1.5 equivalents each of promoter and Et3SiH.
The scope of this methodology was explored with a representative panel of alkenes (Table 2). Notably, only terminal alkenes proved reactive as illustrated by the nearly quantitative transformation of diene 3 to vinyl silane 4 (entry 1); all subsequent studies, therefore, were conduct with this in mind. Fortunately, the reaction conditions were compatible with a variety of functionality including, carbonate 5, methyl ester 7, and amide 9, which furnished 6 (entry 2), 8 (entry 3), 10 (entry 4), respectively, in good to excellent yields and Z-selectivities. Even the readily reduced epoxide 13 and methyl ketone 15 were well behaved and gave rise to the corresponding vinylsilanes 12 (entry 5) and 14 (entry 6). The smooth transformation of TBS ether 15, acetal 17 into 16 (entry 7) and 18 (entry 8) using commercial benzyldimethylsilane, instead of triethylsilane, demonstrates that other silyl moieties are accessible including those suitable for transition metal catalyzed cross-coupling reactions.24
TABLE 2.
Trialkylsilylation of terminal alkenesa
| entry | alkene | silyl adduct | yield (%)b | Z:Ec |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
3 |
4 |
99 | 8:1 |
| 2 |
![]() 5 |
![]() 6 |
96 | 8:1 |
| 3 |
![]() 7 |
![]() 8 |
84 | 7:1 |
| 4 |
![]() 9 |
![]() 10 |
87 | 10:1 |
| 5 |
11 |
![]() 12 |
98 | 10:1 |
| 6 |
![]() 13 |
![]() 14 |
71 | 7:1 |
| 7 |
15 |
16 |
68 | 9:1 |
| 8 |
![]() 17 |
![]() 18 |
71 | 9:1 |
| 9 |
![]() 19 |
![]() 20 |
95 | 9:1 |
| 10 |
![]() 21 |
22 |
84 | 10:1 |
| 11 |
![]() 23 |
![]() 24 |
88 | 8:1 |
| 12 |
![]() 25 |
![]() 26 |
98 | 7:1 |
| 13 |
![]() 27 |
![]() 28 |
77 | 8:1 |
| 14 |
![]() 29 |
![]() 30 |
96 | 8:1 |
| 15 |
![]() 31 |
![]() 32 |
0 | nad |
Reaction conditions: [Ir(OMe)(cod)]2 (5 mol%), dtbpy (10 mol%), 2-norbornene (3 equiv) and R3SiH (3 equiv) in THF for 2h at 40°C.
Combined isolated yield.
Measured by 1H NMR.
na = not applicable.
Aryl groups were likewise good substrates and afforded to silylated benzoate 20, benzyl ether 22, 4-fluorophenyl 24, and 2-bromophenyl 26 beginning from 19 (entry 9), 21 (entry 10), 23 (entry 11), and 25 (entry 12), respectively. To our delight, even the free alcohol 27 generated silylated 28 (entry 13) in useful yield as did the related methyl ether 29 (entry 14). The corresponding allylic alcohol and methyl ether, on the other hand, produced complex product mixtures. NMR analysis of the crude mixtures suggested migration of the olefin might be a contributing factor. Also, conjugated alkenes, e.g., tert-butyl acrylate 31 (entry 15), produced numerous unidentified products and little of the desired Z-vinylsilane.
The details of the reaction mechanism are uncertain at the present time, but a tentative sequence similar to earlier proposals25 is likely (Figure 1). Initial oxidative insertion of the iridium into the silane followed by addition to the more reactive 2-norbornyl olefin generates intermediate i. Heck-type addition25 to the terminal alkene forms intermediate ii. Due to the unfavorable steric interactions present in iia, intermediate iib is likely the predominate conformation. Syn-β-hydride elimination from iib would lead to Z-vinylsilane and iridium-hydride complex iii. Reductive elimination of norbornane iv regenerates the catalyst and completes the catalytic cycle. Furthermore, this proposal highlights an underappreciated role for some so-called “sacrificial olefins” like 2-norbornene, i.e., they can also influence the stereoselectivity of the reaction and, thus, should be taken into consideration when selecting reagent combinations.
FIGURE 1.
Proposed mechanism of Ir-catalyzed trialkylsilylation showing influence of ligand
Conclusion
In summary, we describe a mild, Z-stereoselective dehydrogenative trialkylsilylation of terminal alkenes utilizing a commercial iridium catalyst. Additionally, we demonstrate that 2-norbornene strongly promotes the reaction and also influences its stereoselectivity. Extensions of these concepts will follow in due course.
Experimental Section
General Information
All reactions were carried out under an argon atmosphere. Anhydrous solvents were freshly distilled from sodium benzophenone ketyl, except for CH2Cl2, which was distilled from CaH2. Extracts were dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and then filtered prior to removal of all volatiles under reduced pressure. Unless otherwise noted, commercially available materials were used without further purification. [Ir(OMe)(COD)]2 was purchased from Strem or Aldrich Chem. Co. Flash chromatography (FC) was performed using silica gel 60 (240–400 mesh). Thin layer chromatography was performed using precoated plates purchased (silica gel 60 PF254, 0.25 mm).
1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded in CDCl3 unless stated otherwise. Chemical shifts (δ) are given in ppm relative to residual solvent (usually chloroform δ 7.26 for 1H NMR or δ 77.23 for proton decoupled 13C NMR) and coupling constants (J) in Hz. Multiplicity is tabulated as s for singlet, d for doublet, t for triplet, q for quadruplet, and m for multiplet. The prefix app is applied in cases where the true multiplicity is unresolved and br when the signal in question is broadened..
General Procedure for Iridium-Catalyzed (Z)-Trialkylsilylation
A flame-dried Schlenk tube was charged with terminal alkene (0.2 mmol), [Ir(OMe)(cod)]2 (6.6 mg, 0.01 mmol) and dtbpy (5.4 mg, 0.02 mmol), then evacuated and flushed with argon three times. Under a positive flow of argon, 2-norbornene (56 mg, 0.6 mmol) and dry THF (1 mL) were added. After stirring for 5 min, trialkylsilane (0.6 mmol) was added dropwise and the reaction mixture was stirred at 40 °C for 2h. The solvent was concentrated under reduced pressure and the residue was purified by flash chromatography using silica gel to give the vinylsilane generally as a Z/E-mixture. More extensive purification via PTLC was required to obtain the individual Z- and E-isomers.
Compound 2, combined yield 92%, Z/E = 9:1.
(Z)-Triethyl(4-phenylbut-1-enyl)silane
1H NMR (300 MHz) δ 7.32-7.18 (m, 5H), 6.42 (dt, J = 14.1, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 5.44 (d, J = 14.1 Hz, 1H), 2.69 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.46-2.38 (m, 2H), 0.93 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 9H), 0.59 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 6H); 13C NMR (75 MHz) δ 149.1, 142.1, 128.6, 128.6, 126.2, 126.1, 36.4, 36.3, 7.7, 4.9. HRMS (EI) calcd. for C16H26Si [M]+ m/z 246.1804, found 246.1805.
(E)-Triethyl(4-phenylbut-1-enyl)silane
1H NMR (300 MHz) δ 7.30-7.17 (m, 5H), 6.07 (dt, J = 18.9 Hz, 6.3 Hz, 1H), 5.57 (d, J = 18.9 Hz, 1H), 2.72 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.47-2.40 (m, 2H), 0.91 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 9H), 0.53 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 6H); 13C NMR (75 MHz) δ 147.7, 142.1, 128.7, 128.4, 126.7, 125.9, 39.0, 35.6, 7.6, 3.7.
Compound 4, combined yield 99%, Z/E =8:1.
1-Triethylsilyl-pentadeca-1(Z),12(Z)-diene
1H NMR (300 MHz) δ 6.37 (dt, J = 13.8, 7.5 Hz, 1H), 5.39 (d, J = 13.8 Hz, 1H), 5.36-5.31 (m, 2H), 2.10-1.99 (m, 6H), 1.36-1.28 (m, 14H), 0.98-0.92 (m, 12H), 0.64-0.56 (m, 6H); 13C NMR (75 MHz) δ 150.6, 131.7, 129.6, 125.1, 34.3, 30.0 (2×C), 29.78 (2×C), 29.75, 29.6, 29.5, 27.3, 20.7, 14.6, 7.8, 4.9. HRMS (EI) calcd. for C21H42Si [M]+ m/z 322.3056, found 322.3063.
1-Triethylsilyl-pentadeca-1(E),12(Z)-diene
1H NMR (300 MHz) δ 6.02 (dt, J = 18.6 Hz, 6.3 Hz, 1H), 5.52 (d, J = 18.6 Hz, 1H), 5.44-5.38 (m, 2H), 2.12-1.93 (m, 6H), 1.40-1.26 (m, 14H), 0.96-0.0.88 (m, 12H), 0.58-0.50 (m, 6H); 13C NMR (75 MHz) δ 149.1, 132.1, 129.6, 125.7, 37.3, 32.8, 29.9, 29.8, 29.7, 29.4, 29.3, 29.0, 25.8, 14.2, 7.6, 3.7.
Compound 6, combined yield 96%, Z/E = 8:1.
Ethyl 6-(triethylsilyl)hex-5(Z)-enyl carbonate
1H NMR (300 MHz) δ 6.35 (dt, J = 14.4, 7.2 Hz, 1H), 5.42 (d, J = 14.4 Hz, 1H), 4.19 (q, J = 6.9 Hz, 2H), 4.14 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 2.17-2.09 (m, 2H), 1.72- 1.66 (m, 2H), 1.52-1.44 (m, 2H), 1.31 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H), 0.96-0.91 (m, 9H), 0.64-0.56 (m, 6H); 13C NMR (75 MHz) δ 155.5, 149.5, 126.1, 68.0, 64.1, 33.7, 28.5, 26.1, 14.5, 7.7, 4.9. HRMS (EI) calcd. for C15H31O3Si [M+H]+ m/z 287.2042, found 287.2039.
(E)-Ethyl 6-(triethylsilyl)hex-5-enyl carbonate
1H NMR (300 MHz) δ 6.00 (dt, J = 18.6, 6.3 Hz, 1H), 5.42 (d, J = 18.6 Hz, 1H), 4.19 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 4.13 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 2.18-2.12 (m, 2H), 1.71-1.62 (m, 2H), 1.52-1.46 (m, 2H), 1.31 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H), 0.96-0.89 (m, 9H), 0.58-0.49 (m, 6H); 13C NMR (75 MHz) δ 155.5, 147.9, 126.7, 68.0, 64.1, 36.6, 28.3, 25.1, 14.5, 7.6, 3.7.
Compound 8, combined yield 84%, Z/E = 7:1.
Methyl 7-(triethylsilyl)hept-6(Z)-enoate
1H NMR (300 MHz) δ 6.35 (dt, J = 14.4, 7.2 Hz, 1H), 5.41 (d, J = 14.1 Hz, 1H), 3.67 (s, 3H), 2.32 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 2.15-2.07 (m, 2H), 1.70-1.60 (m, 2H), 1.45- 1.38 (m, 2H), 0.96-0.90 (m, 9H), 0.64-0.55 (m, 6H); 13CNMR (75MHz, CDCl3): δ 174.4, 149.7, 125.9, 51.7, 34.2, 33.9, 29.5, 24.9, 7.8, 4.9. HRMS (EI) calcd. for C14H28O2Si [M]+ m/z 256.1859, found 256.1855.
Methyl 7-(triethylsilyl)hept-6(E)-enoate
1H NMR (300 MHz) δ 6.00 (dt, J = 18.6, 6.0 Hz, 1H), 5.55 (d, J = 18.6 Hz, 1H), 3.67 (s, 3H), 2.32 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 2.17-2.10 (m, 2H), 1.69-1.58 (m, 2H), 1.48- 1.40 (m, 2H), 0.96-0.89 (m, 9H), 0.57-0.47 (m, 6H); 13C NMR (75 MHz) δ 174.4, 148.1, 126.4, 51.7, 36.8, 34.2, 28.4, 24.6, 7.6, 3.7.
Compound 10, combined yield 87%, Z/E =10:1.
N,N-Dibenzyl-7-(triethylsilyl)hept-6(Z)-enamide
1H NMR (300 MHz) δ 7.39-7.14 (m, 10H), 6.35 (dt, J = 14.1, 7.2 Hz, 1H), 5.39 (d, J = 14.1 Hz, 1H), 4.61 (s, 2H), 4.44 (s, 2H), 2.43 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.15-2.07 (m, 2H), 1.78-1.70 (m, 2H), 1.45-1.38 (m, 2H), 0.95-0.89 (m, 9H), 0.62-0.54 (m, 6H); 13C NMR (75 MHz) δ 173.7, 149.8, 137.7, 136.8, 129.2, 128.8, 128.5, 127.8, 127.6, 126.5, 125.7, 50.1, 48.3, 34.0, 33.4, 29.8, 25.4, 7.8, 4.9. HRMS (EI) calcd. for C27H40NOSi [M+H]+ m/z 422.2879, found 422.2877.
N,N-Dibenzyl-7-(triethylsilyl)hept-6(E)-enamide
1H NMR (300 MHz) δ 7.39-7.14 (m, 10H), 6.00 (dt, J = 18.6, 6.0 Hz, 1H), 5.52 (d, J = 18.6 Hz, 1H), 4.60 (s, 2H), 4.44 (s, 2H), 2.43 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.16-2.09 (m, 2H), 1.78-1.70 (m, 2H), 1.49-1.39 (m, 2H), 0.93-0.88 (m, 9H), 0.56-0.46 (m, 6H); 13C NMR (75 MHz) δ 173.8, 148.3, 137.7, 136.8, 129.2, 128.8, 128.5, 127.8, 127.6, 126.5, 126.2, 50.1, 48.2, 37.0, 33.3, 28.8, 25.2, 7.6, 3.7.
Compound 12, combined yield 98%, Z/E =10:1.
(Z)-Triethyl(8-(oxiran-2-yl)oct-1-enyl)silane
1H NMR (300 MHz) δ 6.37 (dt, J = 14.1, 7.2 Hz, 1H), 5.39 (d, J = 14.1 Hz, 1H), 2.92-2.89 (m, 1H), 2.75 (dd, J = 3.9, 4.8 Hz, 1H), 2.47 (dd, J = 2.7, 4.8 Hz, 1H), 2.13-2.06 (m, 2H), 1.54-1.34 (m, 10H), 0.96-0.90 (m, 9H), 0.64-0.55 (m, 6H); 13C NMR (75 MHz) δ 150.4, 125.3, 52.6, 47.4, 34.2, 32.7, 29.9, 29.6, 29.5, 26.1, 7.8, 4.9. HRMS (EI) calcd. for C16H32OSi [M]+ m/z 268.2222, found 268.2222.
(E)-Triethyl(8-(oxiran-2-yl)oct-1-enyl)silane
1H NMR (300 MHz) δ 6.02 (dt, J = 18.9 Hz, 6.3Hz, 1H), 5.53 (d, J = 18.9 Hz, 1H), 2.92-2.88 (m, 1H), 2.75 (dd, J = 3.9, 4.8 Hz, 1H), 2.47 (dd, J = 2.7, 4.8 Hz, 1H), 2.15-2.08 (m, 2H), 1.54-1.34 (m, 10H), 0.95-0.89 (m, 9H), 0.58-0.50 (m, 6H); 13C NMR (75 MHz) δ 148.8, 125.8, 52.6, 47.4, 37.2, 32.7, 29.5, 29.2, 28.9, 26.1, 7.6, 3.7.
Compound 14, combined yield 71%, Z/E = 7:1.
6-(Triethylsilyl)hex-5(Z)-en-2-one, 62% yield following PTLC separation. 1H NMR (300 MHz) δ 6.31 (dt, J = 14.1, 7.2 Hz, 1H), 5.45 (d, J = 14.1 Hz, 1H), 2.53-2.48 (m, 2H), 2.40-2.34 (m, 2H), 2.15 (s, 3H), 1.49-1.42 (m, 2H), 0.96-0.90 (m, 9H), 0.65-0.57 (m, 6H); 13C NMR (75 MHz) δ 208.3, 147.9, 127.0, 43.8, 30.2, 28.3, 7.7, 4.8. HRMS (EI) calcd. for C12H24OSi [M]+ m/z 212.1596, found 212.1599.
6-(Triethylsilyl)hex-5(E)-en-2-one, 9% yield following PTLC separation. 1H NMR (300 MHz) δ 6.01 (dt, J = 18.6, 6.3 Hz, 1H), 5.57 (d, J = 18.6 Hz, 1H), 2.56-2.52 (m, 2H), 2.43-2.36 (m, 2H), 2.15 (s, 3H), 1.49-1.42 (m, 2H), 0.93-0.88 (m, 9H), 0.57-0.49 (m, 6H); 13C NMR (75 MHz) δ 208.6, 146.3, 127.1, 42.9, 31.1, 30.2, 7.6, 3.6.
Compound 16, combined yield 71%, Z/E =7:1.
(Z)-Benzyl(6-(tert-butyldimethylsilyloxy)hex-1-enyl)dimethylsilane
1H NMR (300 MHz) δ 7.25- 7.18 (m, 2H), 7.09-7.00 (m, 3H), 6.33 (dt, J = 14.1, 7.5Hz, 1H), 5.44 (d, J = 14.1 Hz, 1H), 3.59 (t, J = 6.3 Hz, 1H), 2.15 (s, 2H), 2.09-2.02 (m, 2H), 1.53-1.46 (m, 2H), 1.41-1.35 (m, 2H), 0.90 (s, 9H), 0.09 (s, 6H), 0.04 (s, 6H); 13C NMR (75 MHz) δ 150.4, 140.4, 128.4, 128.3, 127.0, 124.1, 63.3, 33.7, 32.7, 26.9, 26.2, 26.1, 18.6, −1.4, −5.1. HRMS (EI) calcd. for C21H39Si2 [M+H]+ m/z 363.2539, found 363.2541.
(E)-Benzyl(6-(tert-butyldimethylsilyloxy)hex-1-enyl)dimethylsilane
1H NMR (300 MHz) δ 7.25-7.18 (m, 2H), 7.09-7.00 (m, 3H), 5.99 (dt, J = 18.9, 7.5 Hz, 1H), 5.58 (d, J = 18.9 Hz, 1H), 3.60 (t, J = 6.3 Hz, 1H), 2.10 (s, 2H), 2.12-2.08 (m, 2H), 1.53-1.47 (m, 2H), 1.45-1.40 (m, 2H), 0.05 (s, 9H), 0.01 (s, 6H), 0.04 (s, 6H); 13C NMR (75 MHz) δ 148.6, 140.4, 128.4, 128.2, 127.9, 124.0, 63.3, 36.7, 32.5, 26.4, 26.2, 18.6, −3.1, −5.0.
Compound 18, combined yield 71%, Z/E =7:1.
(Z)-Benzyldimethyl(4-(2-methyl-1,3-dioxolan-2-yl)but-1-enyl)silane
1H NMR (300 MHz) δ 7.23-7.18 (m, 2H), 7.09-7.00 (m, 3H), 6.33 (dt, J = 14.1, 7.2 Hz, 1H), 5.45 (d, J = 14.1 Hz, 1H), 3.98-3.86 (m, 4H), 2.17 (s, 2H), 2.17-2.10 (m, 2H), 1.68-1.63 (m, 2H), 1.30 (s, 3H), 0.11 (s, 6H); 13C NMR (75 MHz) δ 149.6, 140.3, 128.4, 128.3, 127.2, 124.1, 109.9, 64.9, 39.1, 28.7, 26.9, 24.1, −1.5. HRMS (EI) calcd. for C17H26O2Si [M]+ m/z 290.1702, found 290.1704.
(E)-Benzyldimethyl(4-(2-methyl-1,3-dioxolan-2-yl)but-1-enyl)silane
1H NMR (300 MHz) δ 7.22- 7.17 (m, 2H), 7.08-6.97 (m, 3H), 6.02 (dt, J = 18.6, 6.3 Hz, 1H), 5.61 (d, J = 18.6 Hz, 1H), 3.97-3.88 (m, 4H), 2.25-2.17 (m, 2H), 2.10 (s, 2H), 1.75-1.70 (m, 2H), 1.32 (s, 3H), 0.01 (s, 6H); 13C NMR (75 MHz) δ 148.1, 140.4, 128.5, 128.2, 127.7, 124.1, 110.0, 64.9, 38.2, 31.4, 26.4, 24.2, −3.1.
Compound 20, combined yield 95%, Z/E =9:1.
(Z)-5-(Triethylsilyl)pent-4-enyl benzoate
1H NMR (300 MHz) δ 8.07-8.04 (m, 2H), 7.56-7.53 (m, 1H), 7.47-7.41 (m, 2H), 6.41(dt, J = 14.1, 7.2 Hz, 1H), 5.48 (d, J = 14.1Hz, 1H), 4.34 (t, J = 6.3 Hz, 2H), 2.32-2.25 (m, 2H), 1.91-1.82 (m, 2H), 0.95-0.90 (m, 9H), 0.65-0.57 (m, 6H); 13C NMR (75 MHz) δ 166.9, 148.6, 133.1, 130.6, 129.8, 128.5, 126.8, 64.8, 30.8, 29.1, 7.7, 4.9. HRMS (EI) calcd. for C18H28O2Si [M]+ m/z 304.1859, found 304.1874.
(E)-(6-(Benzyloxy)hex-1-enyl)triethylsilane
1H NMR (300 MHz) δ 8.07-8.04 (m, 2H), 7.58-7.53 (m, 1H), 7.47-7.42 (m, 2H), 6.41(dt, J = 18.6, 6.3 Hz, 1H), 5.62 (d, J = 18.6 Hz, 1H), 4.33 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 2.33-2.26 (m, 2H), 1.94-1.84 (m, 2H), 0.97-0.90 (m, 9H), 0.58-0.50 (m, 6H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 166.9, 147.0, 133.1, 130.6, 129.8, 128.5, 127.3, 64.7, 33.5, 28.0, 7.6, 3.7.
Compound 22, combined yield 84%, Z/E = 10:1.
(Z)-(6-(Benzyloxy)hex-1-enyl)triethylsilane
1H NMR (300 MHz) δ 7.35-7.26 (m, 5H), 6.36 (dt, J = 14.1, 7.5 Hz, 1H), 5.40 (d, J = 14.1 Hz, 1H), 4.51 (s, 2H), 3.48 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 2.16-2.09 (m, 2H), 1.67-1.60 (m, 2H), 1.49-1.44 (m, 2H), 0.96-0.90 (m, 9H), 0.64-0.55 (m, 6H); 13C NMR (75 MHz) δ 150.1, 138.8, 128.6, 127.8, 127.7, 125.6, 73.1, 70.5, 34.0, 29.7, 26.6, 7.8, 4.9. HRMS (EI) calcd. for C19H31OSi [M+H]+ m/z 303.2144, found 303.2160.
(E)-(6-(Benzyloxy)hex-1-enyl)triethylsilane
1H NMR (300 MHz) δ 7.35-7.26 (m, 5H), 6.02 (dt, J = 18.6 Hz, 6.3 Hz, 1H), 5.40 (d, J = 18.6 Hz, 1H), 4.51 (s, 2H), 3.48 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 2.17-2.11 (m, 2H), 1.66-1.58 (m, 2H), 1.51-1.45 (m, 2H), 0.95-0.90 (m, 9H), 0.59-0.50 (m, 6H); 13C NMR (75 MHz) δ 148.5, 138.9, 128.6, 127.8, 127.7, 126.2, 73.0, 70.5, 37.0, 29.4, 25.6, 7.6, 3.7.
Compound 24, combined yield 88%, Z/E =8:1.
(Z)-Triethyl(4-(4-fluorophenyl)but-1-enyl)silane
1H NMR (300 MHz) δ 7.15-7.10 (m, 2H), 6.99-6.94 (m, 2H), 6.39 (dt, J = 14.1, 7.2 Hz, 1H), 5.45 (d, J = 14.1 Hz, 1H), 2.66 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.42-2.35 (m, 2H), 0.95-0.88 (m, 9H), 0.62-0.54 (m, 6H); 13C NMR (75 MHz) δ 163.1, 159.9, 148.8, 137.65, 137.6, 130.0, 129.9, 126.5, 115.4, 115.1, 36.3, 35.5, 7.7, 4.9. HRMS (EI) calcd. for C16H25FSi [M]+ m/z 246.1710, found 264.1715.
(E)-Triethyl(4-(4-fluorophenyl)but-1-enyl)silane
1H NMR (300 MHz) δ 7.14-7.09 (m, 2H), 6.98-6.92 (m, 1H), 6.01 (dt, J = 18.9 Hz, 6.0 Hz, 1H), 5.56 (d, J = 18.9 Hz, 1H), 2.69 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.44-2.37 (m, 2H), 0.93-0.88 (m, 9H), 0.57-0.49 (m, 6H); 13C NMR (75 MHz) δ 163.0, 159.8, 147.3, 137.75, 137.71, 130.0, 129.9, 127.1, 115.3, 115.0, 39.0, 34.7, 7.6, 3.7.
Compound 26, combined yield 88%, Z/E = 7:1.
(Z)-(4-(2-Bromophenyl)but-1-enyl)triethylsilane
1H NMR (300 MHz) δ 7.55-7.52 (m, 1H), 7.24-7.21 (m, 2H), 7.09-7.03 (m, 1H), 6.43 (dt, J = 14.1, 7.2 Hz, 1H), 5.46 (d, J = 14.1 Hz, 1H), 2.81 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.46-2.38 (m, 2H), 0.96-0.89 (m, 9H), 0.63-0.55 (m, 6H); 13C NMR (75 MHz) δ 148.6, 141.3, 133.0, 130.7, 127.8, 127.6, 126.6, 124.6, 36.5, 34.4, 7.7, 4.8. HRMS (EI) calcd. for C16H25BrSi [M]+ m/z 324.0909, found 324.0906.
(E)-(4-(2-Bromophenyl)but-1-enyl)triethylsilane
1H NMR (300 MHz) δ 7.52 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.24-7.20 (m, 2H), 7.07-7.02 (m, 1H), 6.07 (dt, J = 18.6 Hz, 6.3 Hz, 1H), 5.57 (d, J = 18.6 Hz, 1H), 2.84 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.46-2.40 (m, 2H), 0.93-0.88 (m, 9H), 0.57-0.50 (m, 6H); 13C NMR (75 MHz) δ 147.0, 141.3, 132.9, 130.7, 127.7, 127.5, 127.2, 124.6, 37.2, 35.8, 7.6, 3.7.
Compound 28, combined yield 77%, Z/E = 8:1.
(Z)-Triethyl(4-hydroxyl-4-phenylbut-1-enyl)silane, 68% yield following PTLC separation. 1H NMR (300 MHz) δ 7.38-7.26 (m, 5H), 6.41 (dt, J = 14.1, 7.2 Hz, 1H), 5.64 (d, J = 14.1 Hz, 1H), 4.77-4.73 (m, 1H), 2.61-2.55 (m, 2H), 2.03-2.00 (m, 1H), 0.96-0.91 (m, 9H), 0.66-0.58 (m, 6H); 13C NMR (75 MHz) δ 145.1, 144.2, 129.9, 128.7, 127.8, 126.0, 74.1, 43.9, 7.7, 4.8. HRMS (EI) calcd. for C16H26OSi [M]+ m/z 262.1753, found 262.1751.
(E)-Triethyl(4-hydroxyl-4-phenylbut-1-enyl)silane, 8% yield following PTLC separation. 1H NMR (300 MHz) δ 7.36-7.24 (m, 5H), 6.01 (dt, J = 18.6 Hz, 6.3 Hz, 1H), 5.71 (d, J = 18.6 Hz, 1H), 4.78-4.73 (m, 1H), 2.62-2.55 (m, 2H), 2.03-2.02 (m, 1H), 0.93-0.88 (m, 9H), 0.58-0.50 (m, 6H); 13C NMR (75 MHz) δ 144.1, 143.7, 131.6, 128.6, 127.7, 126.0, 73.4, 47.4, 7.6, 3.6.
Compound 30, combined yield 96%, Z/E = 8:1.
(Z)-Triethyl(4-methoxy-4-phenylbut-1-enyl)silane, 85% yield following PTLC separation. 1H NMR (300 MHz) δ 7.39-7.26 (m, 5H), 6.36 (dt, J = 14.4 Hz, 7.2 Hz, 1H), 5.50 (d, J = 14.4 Hz, 1H), 4.14 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 1H), 3.22 (s, 3H), 2.67-2.59 (m, 2H), 2.49-2.40 (m, 2H), 0.93-0.88 (m, 9H), 0.61-0.53 (m, 6H); 13C NMR (75 MHz) δ 145.6, 141.9, 128.6, 127.9, 127.8, 126.9, 84.2, 56.9, 42.5, 7.7, 4.8. HRMS (EI) cald. for C17H28OSi [M]+ m/z 276.1909, found 276.1907.
(E)-Triethyl(4-methoxy-4-phenylbut-1-enyl)silane, yield 10% following PTLC separation. 1H NMR (300 MHz) δ 7.36-7.24 (m, 5H), 5.95 (dt, J = 18.6 Hz, 6.3Hz, 1H), 5.55 (d, J = 18.6 Hz, 1H), 4.14 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 1H), 3.22 (s, 3H), 2.67-2.59 (m, 2H), 2.49-2.40 (m, 2H), 0.90-0.85 (m, 9H), 0.54-0.46 (m, 6H); 13C NMR (75 MHz) δ 144.1, 141.9, 129.3, 128.5, 127.7, 127.0, 84.0, 56.9, 45.9, 7.5, 3.6.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Financial support provided by the Robert A. Welch Foundation and NIH (GM31278, DK38226). Prof. Kasem Nithipatikom (Pharmacology Department, Medical College of Wisconsin) provided high-resolution mass spectral analyses
Footnotes
Supporting Information Available: Analytical data, and 1H/13C spectra for all new compounds. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
References
- 1.Recent examples: Pietraszuk C, Fischer H, Rogalski S, Marciniec B. J Organomet Chem. 2005;690:5912–5921.Itami K, Mitsudo K, Fujita K, Ohashi Y, Yoshida J. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:11058–11066. doi: 10.1021/ja047484+.Fujita M, Lee HJ, Sugimura T, Okuyama T. Chem Commun. 2007:1139–1141. doi: 10.1039/b615888a.
- 2.Curtis-Long MJ, Aye Y. Chem-Eur J. 2009;15:5402–5416. doi: 10.1002/chem.200900337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.(a) Curran JM, Chen R, Hunt JA. Biomaterials. 2005;26:7057–7067. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Tang CY, Xie XL, Zhou XP, Jia XH, Li RKY. J Mater Sci Lett. 2002;21:815–818. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Recent examples: Miura K, Inoue G, Sasagawa H, Kinoshita H, Ichikawa J, Hosomi A. Org Lett. 2009;11:5066–5069. doi: 10.1021/ol902060r.Nicolaou KC, Nold AL, Milburn RR, Schindler CS, Cole KP, Yamaguchi J. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:1760–1768. doi: 10.1021/ja068053p.Singh R, Singh GC, Ghosh SK. Eur J Org Chem. 2007:5376–5385.
- 5.(a) Brook MA. Silicon in Organic Organometallic, and Polymer Chemistry. Chap. 4–6, 9, and 12 Wiley-VCH Verlag; Weinheim (Germany): 2000. [Google Scholar]; (b) Schwieger S, Wagner C, Bruhn C, Schmidt H, Steinborn DZ. Anorg Allg Chem. 2005;631:2696–2704. [Google Scholar]; c) Itami Y, Marciniec B, Majchrzak M, Kubicki M. Organometallics. 2003;22:1835–1842. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rosenberg SD, Walburn JJ, Stankovich TD, Balint AE, Ramsden HE. J Org Chem. 1957;22:1200–1202. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kwan ML, Yeung CW, Breno KL, Doxsee KM. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001;42:1411–1413. [Google Scholar]
- 8.(a) Sudo T, Asao N, Gevorgyan V, Yamamoto Y. J Org Chem. 1999;64:2494–2499. [Google Scholar]; (b) Jun CH, Crabtree RH. J Organomet Chem. 1993;447:177–187. [Google Scholar]; (c) Esteruelas MA, Lopez AM, Oro LA, Tolosa JI. J Mol Catal A: Chem. 1995;96:21–23. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Soderquist JA, Leon G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998;39:3989–3990. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Other procedures: Horino Y, Luzung MR, Toste FD. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:11364–11365. doi: 10.1021/ja0636800.Ohmiya H, Yorimitsu H, Oshima K. Org Lett. 2006;8:3093–3096. doi: 10.1021/ol0611144.Barbero A, Pulido FJ. Acc Chem Res. 2004;37:817–825. doi: 10.1021/ar0400490.
- 11.For review on vinyl C-H silylation and its mechanism, see: Marciniec B. Coord Chem Rev. 2005;249:2374–2390.
- 12.Kakiuchi F, Tanaka Y, Chatani N, Murai S. J Organomet Chem. 1993;456:45–47. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Takeshita K, Seki Y, Kawamoto K, Murai S, Sonoda N. J Org Chem. 1987;52:4864–4868. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lapointe AM, Rix FC, Brookhart M. J Am Chem Soc. 1997;119:906–917. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cipot J, McDonald R, Ferguson MJ, Schatte G, Stradiotto M. Organometallics. 2007;26:594–608. Notably, the iridium analog and Et3SiH reduce terminal olefins. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Seki Y, Takeshita K, Kawamoto K, Murai S, Sonoda N. J Org Chem. 1986;51:3890–3895. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Oro LA, Fernandez MJ, Esteruelas MA, Jimenez MS. J Mol Catal. 1986;37:151–156. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Jiang Y, Blacque O, Fox T, Frech CM, Berke H. Chem-Eur J. 2009;15:2121–2128. doi: 10.1002/chem.200802019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Terao J, Torii K, Saito K, Kambe N, Baba A, Sonoda N. Angew Chem Int Ed. 1998;37:2653–2656. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19981016)37:19<2653::AID-ANIE2653>3.0.CO;2-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hirano K, Yorimitsu H, Oshima K. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:6094–6095. doi: 10.1021/ja070938t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lu B, Falck JR. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2008;47:7508–7510. doi: 10.1002/anie.200802456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.A related E-selective Ir-catalyzed borylation has been reported: Olsson VJ, Szabó KJ. Org Lett. 2008;10:3129–3131. doi: 10.1021/ol801203u.
- 23.Similar iridium catalysts have been applied to aromatic C-H borylation, see: Paul S, Chotana GA, Holmes D, Reichle R, Maleczka PE, Smith MR. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:15552–15553. doi: 10.1021/ja0631652.Boller TM, Murphy JM, Hapke M, Ishiyama T, Miyaura N, Hartwig JF. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:14263–14278. doi: 10.1021/ja053433g.
- 24.(a) Denmark SE, Tymonto SA. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:8004–8005. doi: 10.1021/ja0518373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Trost BM, Machacek MR, Ball ZT. Org Lett. 2003;5:1895–1898. doi: 10.1021/ol034463w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Iridium catalyzed Heck reaction: Koike T, Du X, Sanada T, Danda Y, Mori A. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2003;42:89–92. doi: 10.1002/anie.200390061.
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.










































