Abstract
Objective: To study the oxidative stress and antioxidative response of Cinnamomum camphora seedlings exposed to nitrogen dioxide (NO2) fumigation. Methods: Measurements were made up of the growth, chlorophyll content, chlorophyll fluorescence, antioxidant system and lipid peroxidation of one-year-old C. camphora seedlings exposed to NO2 (0.1, 0.5, and 4 μl/L) fumigation in open top chambers over a period of 60 d. Results: After the first 30 d, 0.5 and 4.0 μl/L NO2 showed insignificant effects on the growth of C. camphora seedlings. However, exposure to 0.5 and 4.0 μl/L NO2 for 15 d significantly reduced their chlorophyll content (P<0.05), enhanced their malondialdehyde (MDA) content and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity (P<0.05), and also significantly reduced the maximal quantum yield of PSII in the dark [the ratio of variable fluorescence to maximal fluorescence (F v/F m)] (P<0.05). In the latter 30 d, 0.5 μl/L NO2 showed a positive effect on the vitality of the seedlings, which was reflected by a recovery in the ratio of F v/F m and chlorophyll content, and obviously enhanced growth, SOD activity, ascorbate (AsA) content and glutathione reductase (GR) activity (P<0.05); 4.0 μl/L NO2 then showed a negative effect, indicated by significant reductions in chlorophyll content and the ratio of F v/F m, and inhibited growth (P<0.05). Conclusion: The results suggest adaptation of C. camphora seedlings to 60-d exposure to 0.1 and 0.5 μl/L NO2, but not to 60-d exposure to 4.0 μl/L NO2. C. camphora seedlings may protect themselves from injury by strengthening their antioxidant system in response to NO2-induced oxidative stress.
Keywords: Cinnamomum camphora, Fumigation, Growth, Chlorophyll content, Chlorophyll fluorescence, Antioxidant, Lipid peroxidation
1. Introduction
Nitrogen dioxide (NO2), one of the main traffic-related air pollutants, contributes to the forming of ozone via a photochemical reaction with hydroxyl radicals in the atmosphere (Takahashi et al., 2005). Hourly concentrations of NO2 in Japan, UK and USA are reported to reach levels of 0.02–0.19, 0.25–0.4 and 0.01–0.12 μl/L (Takahashi et al., 2005). In China, atmospheric NO2 concentration averagely in some large cities was recorded to be 0.017 μl/L in 2006 (Ministry of the Environmental Protection of the People’s Republic of China, 2007).
Plants have been shown to metabolize dissolved NOx through an NO3 − assimilation pathway to form amino acids and proteins (Zeevaart, 1976; Marie and Ormrod, 1984). Stimulated growth has been reported in the presence of low concentrations of NO2 (Sabaratnam et al., 1988; Okano et al., 1985; Marie and Ormrod, 1984). However, negative effects on plant health were observed under either high concentration and short-term NO2 exposure (Sabaratnam and Gupat, 1988; Qiao and Murray, 1998) or low concentration and long-term NO2 exposure (Ashenden, 1970; Ashenden et al., 1990; Maggs and Ashmore, 1998). Thus, the effect of NO2 on plants depends on the experimental conditions such as the plant species studied, NO2 concentration and stress duration.
Uptake of NO2 results in a reduction in photosynthesis, which can be explained by competition for nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) between the processes of nitrite reduction and carbon assimilation in the chloroplast, and thereby leads to the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Sabaratnam and Gupat, 1988; Clyde Hill and Bennet, 1970; Shimazaki et al., 1992). When the production rate of ROS exceeds the elimination rate, lipid peroxidation and DNA injury may occur, and the organism may suffer from oxidative stress (Pan et al., 2006). However, plants have their own defense mechanisms including antioxidants and antioxidant enzymes (Wu and Tiedemann, 2002; Lai et al., 2007). For instance, peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and the ascorbate-glutathione cycle (AGC) protect various vital physiological processes from injury by ROS produced under stress (Rai et al., 2004; Wu and Tiedemann, 2002). Studies have been carried out on the growth, chlorophyll content, photosynthesis, nitrogen content and enzymes related to nitrogen metabolism of plants exposed to NO2, including nitrite reductase, glutamine synthetase and glutamate synthase (Takahashi et al., 2005; Yu et al., 1988; Sabaratnam et al., 1988; Qiao and Murray, 1998; Okano et al., 1985). However, little is known about the antioxidative response of plants and the regulation of photosynthesis.
As motorized traffic is one of the main sources of atmospheric NO2, we should pay more attention to roadside species when studying the effects of NO2 on plants. Cinnamomum camphora, the camphor tree, one of the most important trees in the subtropical evergreen broadleaf forest, is widely distributed in the south of China along the Yangtze River valley, and is also found in Korea, Japan and Vietnam (Zheng, 1983). It has been widely planted in cities throughout southern China because of its high landscaping value and disease and pollution resistance (Tian et al., 2007). Takahashi et al. (2005) reported that C. camphora showed a high assimilation capacity at 0.1 μl/L NO2 and a low assimilation capacity at 4.0 μl/L NO2, and was therefore classified in a group showing low resistance and high assimilation to NO2 among 70 taxa of woody plants used as roadside trees.
In this study, 60-d NO2 fumigation was carried out to study oxidative stress and the antioxidative response of C. camphora. The results will be helpful in determining the resistance of C. camphora to NO2 and in providing a base for future studies of environmental toxicology in plants.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Plant material and treatment
The study was conducted on one-year old C. camphora seedlings in a suburban area of Hangzhou, located in the southeast of China at 30°14′ N latitude, 120°09′ E longitude and 102 m above sea level. Seeds were germinated in a sand bed on Mar. 20, 2007 and seedlings were transplanted into 1-L pots (one plant per pot) after two leaves had grown. The culture medium was a mixture of turf (organic matter:crude ash=42:58, w/w), vermiculite and perlite in the proportions 4.5:4.5:1 (v/v/v). Seedlings were separated into four treatments: exposure to 0.1, 0.5 or 4.0 μl/L NO2 or unfiltered air (the control, CK). One hundred seedlings per treatment were transferred to open-top chambers (OTC) on July 12, 2007. Seedlings were treated for a period of 60 d during daytime hours (10 h/d, 7 d/week). Measurements of their growth, chlorophyll fluorescence, chlorophyll content, antioxidant system and lipid peroxidation were made every 15 d.
2.2. OTC and the experimental environment
Potted seedlings were placed in eight OTCs. Each OTC was a hexagonal prism of 1.85 m height and 1.16 m diameter. A board with 1 200 holes (each 12 mm in diameter) was inserted in the chamber at a height of 30 cm from the bottom. Air was pumped continuously through the chamber from the bottom. NO2 from a compressed source was ventilated into the bottom of the chamber through a Teflon tube connected by a solenoid valve. The concentration of the gas in the chamber was monitored using a system consisting of a solenoid valve, an online-sensor, a single chip micyoco (SCM) and a computer. The concentration was sensed by an electrochemical sensor, converted to digital signal, and then sent to a computer by the SCM. The computer database was compared against the target concentration and used to send a command to the SCM to control the solenoid valve to open or close each second. The solenoid valve was in mic-flux and low-frequency pulse width modulation (PWM). The fluctuation of the gas concentration in different parts of the chamber was measured and found to remain within 5% of the target concentration. Natural sunlight was used as the light source. The measured data of temperature, humidity and light density inside the chamber during the experiment are shown in Table 1.
Table 1.
Environmental conditions of the experimental site during the experiment
| Date | Mean temperature (°C) |
Relative humidity (%) |
PFD of the sunshine (μmol/(m2·s)) |
|||||
| Max | Min | Max | Min | Max | Min | |||
| July, 2007 | 34.0 | 28.7 | 42.9 | 28.2 | 180.6 | 6.45 | ||
| August, 2007 | 34.1 | 29.4 | 39.8 | 22.8 | 182.4 | 7.23 | ||
| September, 2007 | 26.8 | 24.9 | 54.0 | 41.5 | 135.3 | 4.01 | ||
2.3. Growth measurement
Every 15 d, eight seedlings from each treatment were collected. Ground diameter and height were measured and the ratio of height/ground diameter was calculated. The seedlings were washed and heated to 80 °C and the above-ground dry weight and below-ground dry weight were recorded until they reached a constant level.
2.4. Chlorophyll content determination
Fully expanded leaves from area around the middle of the trunk of each of eight seedlings per treatment were randomly selected for measurement every 15 d. The petiole and the primary veins were removed from the leaves and discarded. Three independent chlorophyll measurements were made for each leaf sample. Portions of the samples were also used for measurements of the antioxidant system and lipid peroxidation determinations.
Frozen leaf tissue was homogenized in 80% (v/v) ice-cold acetone in the dark. The supernatant was separated by centrifugation at 2 000×g for 10 min. Chlorophyll content was determined by measuring the absorbance of the supernatant at 646 and 663 nm, as described by Lichtenthaler (1987).
2.5. Chlorophyll fluorescence
Measurements of chlorophyll fluorescence were made every 15 d from the upper face of designated seedling leaves using an LI-6400 photosynthesis system (LI-COR Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA) fitted with an integral fluorescence chamber. Before each measurement, eight fully developed seedlings were taken and placed in the dark for 15 min at (22±1) °C. After recording the dark signal level, the minimum fluorescence F 0 was obtained by excitation of a probing light beam. The intensity of this light was sufficiently low so as to not produce any significant variable fluorescence [1.6 kHz, photon flux density (PFD)=0.02 μmol photons/(m2·s)]. A single saturating flash [1 s, PFD=4 500 μmol photons/(m2·s)] was then applied to reach maximal fluorescence (F m). The yield of variable fluorescence (F v) was calculated as F m−F 0. Photosynthetic capacity (also termed the maximal quantum yield) was estimated by the ratio of (F m−F 0)/F m (also termed F v/F m) for dark-adapted leaves (Genty et al., 1990; Frankart et al., 2002).
2.6. Antioxidant system analysis
SOD activity was assayed by its ability to inhibit the photochemical reduction of nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) (Dhindsa et al., 1981). The absorbance was recorded at 560 nm. It was expressed as U/g fresh weight, and 1 U was defined as the amount of enzyme causing 50% inhibition of NBT reduction under the assay conditions.
Ascorbic acid (AsA) content was determined following the procedure of Ella et al. (2003). Frozen leaf tissue was homogenized with 3 ml of 5% (w/v) metaphosphoric acid and then centrifuged at 20 000×g. The mixture of 0.25 ml of 3 mmol/L 2,6-dichloroindophenol (DCIP) and 0.5 ml supernatant was kept at room temperature for 20 min, incubated at 50 °C for 1 h after adding 0.5 ml of 1% (w/v) thiourea in 5% metaphosphoric acid and 0.5 ml of 10 mmol/L dinitrophenylhydrazone (DNPH), and then cooled in an ice bath for 15 min while adding 1.25 ml of ice-cold 85% (v/v) sulfuric acid (H2SO4). An aliquot of 0.5 ml of 20% (v/v) H2SO4 was added and absorbance at 520 nm was measured. Corrections were made for the oxidation of ascorbate by replacing DCIP with distilled water.
Glutathione reductase (GR) activity was assayed as described by Foyer and Halliwell (1976) and Liu et al. (2007). The reaction mixture consisted of 50 mmol/L phosphate buffered saline (pH 7.8), 0.15 mmol/L NADPH, 0.5 mmol/L oxidized glutathione (GSSG) and enzyme extract. The decrease in absorption at 340 nm [ε=6.2 (mmol/L·cm)−1] due to NADPH oxidation was recorded over 2.5 min and was expressed as U/g fresh weight (1 U=1 mmol substrate activated during 1 min at 25 °C).
2.7. Lipid peroxidation determination
The degree of lipid peroxidation was estimated using malondialdehyde (MDA) as an indicator. The MDA content was determined using the thiobarbituric acid (TBA) method (Shalata and Tal, 1998). Samples were mixed with 1 ml of 10% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid (TCA) and 1 ml of 0.67% (w/v) TBA, and were then heated in a boiling water bath for 15 min. The amount of TBA reactive substance (TBARS) formed was determined by measuring absorbance at 535 nm and correcting for nonspecific absorbance at 600 nm. The MDA content was expressed as nmol/L MDA/g fresh weight.
2.8. Statistical analysis
Statistical data analysis was performed using SPSS version 10.0 software. Treatments were compared using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Prior to the analysis, data were checked for normality and homogeneity of variance, and were square root transformed to equalize variances. Differences between treatments were considered significant at P<0.05.
3. Results
3.1. Growth
In the first 30 d of the experiment, all levels of NO2 fumigation yielded insignificant differences in growth, including the height, ground diameter, above-ground dry weight, below-ground dry weight and ratio of height/diameter. By the end of the experiment, NO2 fumigation still showed no significant effects on the height. However, by then 0.5 μl/L NO2 had increased the ground diameter, above-ground dry weight and below-ground dry weight to the highest in the treatments, significantly higher than the corresponding control values. Treatment with 0.1 μl/L NO2 also significantly promoted the growth of ground diameter, while 4.0 μl/L NO2 significantly reduced the above-ground dry weight and below-ground dry weight (Table 2).
Table 2.
Effects of different concentrations of NO2 on the growth parameters of Cinnamomum camphora seedlings
| NO2 (μl/L) | Duration (d) | Ground diameter (cm) | Height (cm) | Above-ground dry weight (g) | Below-ground dry weight (g) | Ratio of height/ground diameter |
| CK | 0 | 1.92±0.124 | 15.18±1.22 | 0.2768±0.0357 | 0.2416±0.0250 | 79.036±9.78 |
| 15 | 1.96±0.10a | 17.60±1.23a | 0.3792±0.0341a | 0.2697±0.0247a | 89.802±6.72a | |
| 30 | 2.18±0.11a | 21.21±0.93a | 0.4389±0.0255a | 0.2875±0.0309a | 97.298±4.71a | |
| 45 | 2.52±0.09a | 22.18±1.87a | 0.5134±0.0378a | 0.3247±0.0351ab | 88.027±4.07a | |
| 60 | 2.66±0.10a | 22.37±1.67a | 0.5980±0.0486a | 0.4531±0.0278a | 84.104±9.23a | |
| 0.1 | 0 | − | − | − | − | − |
| 15 | 2.01±0.16a | 17.82±1.56a | 0.3809±0.0350a | 0.2875±0.0267a | 88.662±9.07a | |
| 30 | 2.34±0.16a | 21.35±1.81a | 0.4359±0.0323a | 0.3525±0.0254a | 91.242±5.16a | |
| 45 | 2.74±0.17ab | 22.69±2.11a | 0.5695±0.0440a | 0.3987±0.0381a | 82.812±6.53a | |
| 60 | 2.93±0.13b | 23.68±1.01a | 0.6563±0.0442a | 0.4840±0.0452a | 80.821±8.86a | |
| 0.5 | 0 | − | − | − | − | − |
| 15 | 1.98±0.13a | 18.21±0.56a | 0.3154±0.0464a | 0.2733±0.0298a | 91.970±6.45a | |
| 30 | 2.25±0.15a | 21.72±1.25a | 0.4251±0.0422a | 0.3588±0.0398a | 96.533±9.13a | |
| 45 | 2.87±0.16b | 23.05±2.03a | 0.6391±0.0650b | 0.4839±0.0365c | 80.314±5.75b | |
| 60 | 3.10±0.17b | 24.06±0.86a | 0.7493±0.0558b | 0.6184±0.0372b | 77.613±5.51b | |
| 4.0 | 0 | − | − | − | − | − |
| 15 | 1.99±0.12a | 17.93±1.39a | 0.3322±0.0286a | 0.2516±0.0369a | 90.101±4.89a | |
| 30 | 2.13±0.15a | 21.06±1.71a | 0.3769±0.0398a | 0.2675±0.0449a | 98.874±5.32a | |
| 45 | 2.35±0.16a | 21.66±1.08a | 0.4682±0.0380a | 0.2871±0.0465b | 92.171±8.77a | |
| 60 | 2.45±0.15a | 21.73±1.59a | 0.5028±0.0315c | 0.3430±0.0350c | 88.698±9.04a |
The values represent mean±SD (n=8). Different lower case letters following the values show significant differences (P<0.05) between treatments according to one-way ANOVA
3.2. Chrolophyll fluorescence
Exposure to 0.5 and 4.0 μl/L NO2 for 15 d brought about an enhancement in F 0 (P<0.05); however, in the subsequent treatment period, no statistical difference from the control was found. Exposure to 0.5 μl/L NO2 had little impact on F m but 0.1 μl/L NO2 reduced F m to 977.7 after 15 d (P<0.05). Exposure to 4.0 μl/L NO2 reduced F m significantly to 988.4 and 977.3 after 15 and 60 d, respectively. After 15 d of fumigation, NO2 caused a significant reduction in the ratio of F v/F m at NO2 concentrations of 0.5 and 4.0 μl/L. In subsequent periods, NO2 showed insignificant effects on the ratio of F v/F m with the exception of 30 d×4.0 μl/L NO2 and 60 d×4.0 μl/L NO2 (Table 3).
Table 3.
Effects of different concentrations of NO2 on the chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of Cinnamomum camphora seedlings
| NO2 (μl/L) | Duration (d) | F0 | Fm | Fv/Fm |
| CK | 0 | 165.7±5.1 | 922.8±34.94 | 0.820±0.004 |
| 15 | 170.0±7.1a | 1058.6±47.7a | 0.839±0.014a | |
| 30 | 175.7±7.2a | 958.8±31.3a | 0.817±0.004ab | |
| 45 | 178.4±9.1a | 974.7±32.2ab | 0.817±0.005ab | |
| 60 | 180.5±7.1a | 1005.2±8.6a | 0.820±0.009a | |
| 0.1 | 0 | − | − | − |
| 15 | 163.7±6.5a | 977.7±22.6c | 0.832±0.011ab | |
| 30 | 169.5±11.4a | 892.4±47.8a | 0.810±0.004a | |
| 45 | 176.1±11.4a | 1001.3±40.3a | 0.824±0.009a | |
| 60 | 178.3±13.5a | 1028.2±14.5a | 0.827±0.013a | |
| 0.5 | 0 | − | − | − |
| 15 | 190.7±7.0b | 1034.5±12.8ab | 0.815±0.006b | |
| 30 | 173.7±8.3a | 968.5±32.0a | 0.821±0.007b | |
| 45 | 171.4±9.4a | 958.8±43.8ab | 0.821±0.004ab | |
| 60 | 165.1±10.2a | 964.9±38.9a | 0.829±0.007a | |
| 4.0 | 0 | − | − | − |
| 15 | 201.2±9.4b | 988.4±12.6bc | 0.797±0.007c | |
| 30 | 182.0±9.3a | 903.0±6.5a | 0.799±0.005c | |
| 45 | 183.5±9.7a | 915.2±33.3b | 0.799±0.009b | |
| 60 | 174.9±7.7a | 877.3±3.5b | 0.801±0.009b |
The values represent mean±SD (n=8). Different lower case letters following the values show significant differences (P<0.05) between treatments according to one-way ANOVA
3.3. Chlorophyll content
NO2 fumigation at each concentration reduced the Chl a, Chl b and Chl (a+b) contents in the first 30 d (P<0.05), except that 0.5 μl/L NO2 showed no statistical difference from the control in Chl a×30 d and Chl (a+b)×30 d (Fig. 1). In the second 30 d period, 0.1 and 0.5 μl/L NO2 had little effects, while 4.0 μl/L NO2 significantly reduced the chlorophyll contents. In the control samples, overall decreases were found of 18.36%, 15.32% and 17.53% in Chl a, Chl b and Chl (a+b) contents, respectively, compared with values obtained at the beginning of the experiment.
Fig. 1.
Effects of different concentrations of NO2 on chlorophyll a (a), chlorophyll b (b) and chlorophyll (a+b) (c) contents in leaves of Cinnamomum camphora seedlings. Data are expressed as mean±SD (n=8). Different lower case letters on bars show significant differences (P<0.05) between treatments according to one-way ANOVA
3.4. Lipid peroxidation
In every phase of the experiment, the MDA contents in NO2 treatments were significantly higher than those of the control (Fig. 2). By the end of the experiment, the MDA contents in the 4.0, 0.5 and 0.1 μl/L NO2 treatments were higher by 87.42%, 30.62% and 26.96%, respectively, than that of the control.
Fig. 2.
Effects of different concentrations of NO2 on lipid peroxidation (a) and the antioxidant system ((b) SOD, (c) AsA and (d) GR) in leaves of Cinnamomum camphora seedlings. Data are expressed as mean±SD (n=8). Different lower case letters on bars show significant differences (P<0.05) between treatments according to one-way ANOVA
3.5. Antioxidant system
As the experiment proceeded, the SOD activities first rose and then, in the 0.5 and 4.0 μl/L NO2 treatments, stabilised at a level significantly higher than that of the control (Fig. 2). In the 0.1 μl/L NO2 treatment, after the initial rise, levels fluctuated slightly. At the end of the fumigation period, SOD activities had risen in proportion to the concentration of NO2. In the 4.0 and 0.5 μl/L NO2 treatments, SOD activities were higher than that of the control by 88.81% and 54.80% (P<0.05), respectively.
Compared with the control, in the presence of 0.1 and 0.5 μl/L NO2, the AsA contents decreased significantly in the first 30 d with the exception of 0.1 μl/L NO2×15 d and increased significantly in the following 30 d with the exception of 0.1 μl/L NO2×45 d (Fig. 2). Treatment with 4.0 μl/L NO2 increased the AsA content after 30 d to a much higher level than the other NO2 treatments and 56.11% higher than the control (P<0.05), but reduced it sharply to a level significantly lower than the control after 45 d, and after 60 d showed an insignificant effect. The AsA content of control samples decreased by 46.16% from the start to the end of the experiment.
During the fumigation, GR activity showed a double-peak tendency in the 4.0 μl/L NO2 treatment and a single-peak tendency in the 0.1 and 0.5 μl/L NO2 treatments (Fig. 2). In the 4.0 μl/L NO2 treatment, GR activity increased to a significantly higher level than in the other treatments after 15 d, but weakened steeply to a level significantly lower than in the control after 30 d, and remained statistically insignificant from the control in the last period of the experiment. In the 0.1 and 0.5 μl/L NO2 treatments, compared with the control, GR activities were insignificantly different after 15 d, significantly lower after 30 d, then significantly higher in the last phase with the exception of 0.1 μl/L NO2×60 d. To sum up, the effects of NO2 fumigation on GR activity differed in the changing phases of the experiment. The GR activity of control samples fell by 51.32% from the start to the end of the experiment.
4. Discussion
4.1. Growth
In this study, 30-d NO2 fumigation caused insignificant differences in the growth of C. camphora seedlings. 60-d treatment with 4.0 μl/L NO2 inhibited growth, but 60-d treatment with 0.5 or 0.1 μl/L NO2 promoted growth (Table 2). This suggests that C. camphora lacks adaptation to NO2 at the level of 4.0 μl/L but is adapted to levels of 0.1 and 0.5 μl/L. Pandey and Agrawal (1994) reported that the relative growth rate and net assimilation rate of tomato plants increased initially but then declined after exposure for longer periods to 0.2 μl/L NO2. A lack of adaptation to long-term and low-concentration NO2 was also reported for P. pratensis and Pakistan rice (Ashenden, 1970; Maggs and Ashmore, 1998). Differences in adaptability to NO2 among plant species may be caused by their different metabolic and antioxidant systems (Liu et al., 2007). Similar adaptation responses of plants to long-term ozone have been reported (Walmsley et al., 1980; Mehlhorn et al., 1991).
4.2. Oxidative stress
The view is commonly held that uptake of NO2 results in the generation of ROS in plants because of competition for NADPH between the processes of nitrite reduction and carbon assimilation in the chloroplast, and the strong radical nature of NO2 (Sabaratnam and Gupat, 1988; Clyde Hill and Bennet, 1970; Shimazaki et al., 1992; Ramge et al., 1993). Although growth was not significantly affected by NO2 in the first 30 d, variation occurred in lipid peroxidation, chlorophyll fluorescence and chlorophyll contents, each of which might be an indicator of air pollution injury (Tables 2 and 3, Fig. 1).
MDA, the decomposition product of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) of biomembranes, is a good indicator of the severity of cell injury during oxidative stress (Price et al., 1990). In this study, three concentrations of NO2 increased the MDA contents in every treatment period, indicating the existence of oxidative injury induced by NO2 during the experiment (Fig. 2).
In this study, F 0 was significantly increased after 15 d at 0.5 and 4.0 μl/L NO2, indicating that modifications were induced at the antenna pigment level (Calatayud and Barreno, 2001) (Table 3). After the same duration, a significant decrease in the ratio of F v/F m in these two treatments indicated that the photochemistry of PSII and its functional efficiency were affected (Maxwell and Johnson, 2000) (Table 3). Similar results were observed by Barnes et al. (1988), Guidi et al. (1997) and Carrasco-Rodriguez and Valle-Tascon (2001) in higher plants exposed to ozone. In the subsequent time period, the photosynthetic efficiency recovered at 0.5 μl/L NO2 but remained lower at 4.0 μl/L NO2 than at the control, which was reflected by the F m and the ratio of F v/F m (Table 3). Although it was not possible to conclude that the decline in photosynthesis was the result or cause of ROS accumulation, the inverse correlation between the decreased ratio of F v/F m and increased MDA contents in the 15 d×0.5 μl/L NO2, 15 d×4.0 μl/L NO2 and 60 d×4.0 μl/L NO2 indicated a possible association between them (Table 3, Fig. 2).
Chlorophyll pigments are essential for photosynthesis and a decrease in chlorophyll content has been used as an indicator of air pollution injury (Darrall and Jäger, 1984). In this study, NO2 reduced the Chl a, Chl b and Chl (a+b) contents in the first 30 d (Fig. 1). Similar phenomena have been observed in plants such as Hedera helix (Della-Torre et al., 1998) and Avena sativa L. (Pleijel et al., 1994), and may be caused by the disintegration of pigments by ROS (Sakaki et al., 1983). In the subsequent 30 d, 4.0 μl/L NO2 significantly reduced pigmentation, but 0.1 and 0.5 μl/L NO2 had an insignificant effect (Fig. 1). Ra et al. (2005) found that moderate levels of fertilizer air pollutants may permit higher protein synthesis rates, improve the ratio of intact chlorophyll to degraded forms, and increase overall concentrations of pigments and CO2 uptake of lichen. The availability of nitrogen from 0.1 and 0.5 μl/L NO2 may promote the synthesis of pigments and counteract the destruction by ROS, leading to a recovery in chlorophyll content. The continuously declining chlorophyll contents in the 4.0 μl/L treatment indicated that oxidative stress was still inhibiting the plant (Fig. 1). The tendency of chlorophyll contents to decrease in the experiment may have resulted from the increasing senescence of the seedlings as growth was taking place (Makino and Osmond, 1991).
4.3. Antioxidative response
SOD is essential for the elimination of ROS in plants because its enzymatic action dismutates superoxide (O2 −) to H2O2 and O2 (Meloni et al., 2003). A correlation between increased SOD activity and tolerance to air pollutants has been observed in many plants, and is considered to be an adjustment response to stress (Lee and Bennett, 1982). In this study, SOD activities increased with increasing NO2 concentrations, suggesting a dose-dependent effect of NO2 on SOD activity (Fig. 2).
AGC contributes greatly to antioxidant protection against H2O2 (Potters et al., 2002). Several enzymes and antioxidants are involved in these reactions including AsA and GR (Foyer and Halliwell, 1976; Smirnoff, 1996). In general, the biosynthesis of AsA and reduced glutathione (GSH, catalyzed from oxidized glutathione by GR) is stimulated when the cell encounters stress conditions (Foyer and Halliwell, 1976; Horemans et al., 2000; Potters et al., 2002). In the present study, 0.5 μl/L NO2 reduced AsA contents and GR activities in the first 30 d, but induced them in the subsequent 30 d, indicating that AGC was efficiently activated to detoxify ROS in the second 30 d period (Fig. 2). Activated AGC, together with enhanced SOD, formed a stronger antioxidant system in the final 30 d. A new balance between the production and elimination of ROS was established to control the oxidative stress within an acceptable level, as shown by the recovered chlorophyll contents and growth promotion in the 0.5 μl/L NO2 treatment (Table 2, Figs. 1 and 2). Alternatively, C. camphora has a substantial reserve of phenolics, which can act as reducing agents, hydrogen donators and singlet oxygen quenchers (Rice-Evans et al., 1996; Zhang and Lin, 2008). The production of phenolics is considered to be a response to injuries (Dixon and Paiva, 1995) and may have contributed to the recovery from injury at 0.5 μl/L NO2, and thus the continued growth and early leaf senescence in C. camphora (Table 2, Figs. 1 and 2). Further studies on phenolic compounds should be carried out to test this possibility.
In the 4.0 μl/L NO2 treatment, the AsA content and GR activity fluctuated widely and asynchronously (Fig. 2), indicating a low efficiency AGC and thus an unbalanced antioxidant system less able to contribute to the scavenging of ROS. A similar asynchronous tendency between AsA content and GR activity was reported for Populus euramericana (Edjolo et al., 2001). As AsA and GSH not only act as antioxidants, but also have other functions in physiological processes (Horemans et al., 2000; Potters et al., 2002), it was difficult to identify the mechanisms by which they were affected by NO2 treatment. This needs further study at the cellular level. The general duration-dependent fall in AsA content and GR activity in the control suggests a physiological process of senescence in leaves, which is similar to time-dependent changes in GSH content found in chloroplasts of tomato (Kuźniak and Skłodowska, 2001).
5. Conclusion
In conclusion, according to the antioxidative responses and the parameters, there was an adaptation response of C. camphora seedlings after 60-d of 0.1 and 0.5 μl/L NO2, but not after 60-d of 4.0 μl/L NO2, suggesting that the critical toxic value of atmospheric NO2 in inducing influential oxidative injury to C. camphora seedlings is between 0.5 and 4.0 μl/L. The seedlings may protect themselves from injury by concordantly strengthening their antioxidant system under NO2-induced oxidative stress. The MDA content and SOD activity responded comparatively steadily to the dose of NO2 and may be important indicators of oxidative stress caused by NO2 in C. camphora seedlings. Further studies at the cellular or molecular level and on antioxidative compounds (phenolics and flavonoids) should be conducted to clarify the mechanisms involved in rebuilding a balanced antioxidant system after extended exposure to 0.5 μl/L NO2.
6. Acknowledgement
We thank members of the phytoremediation group in the College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University for their assistance with sampling.
Footnotes
Project supported by Zhejiang Keystone Projects (No. 2005C22056), and the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No. Y5080011)
References
- 1.Ashenden TW. The effects of long-term exposures to SO2 and NO2 pollution on the growth of Dactylis glomerata L. and Poapratensis L. Environ Pollut. 1970;18(4):249–258. doi: 10.1016/0013-9327(79)90020-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ashenden TW, Bell SA, Rafarel CR. Effects of nitrogen dioxide pollution on the growth of three fern species. Environ Pollut. 1990;66(4):301–318. doi: 10.1016/0269-7491(90)90147-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Barnes JD, Reiling K, Davison AW, Renner CJ. Interaction between ozone and winter stress. Environ Pollut. 1988;53(1-4):235–254. doi: 10.1016/0269-7491(88)90037-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Calatayud A, Barreno E. Chlorophyll a fluorescence, antioxidant enzymes and lipid peroxidation in tomato in response to ozone and benomyl. Environ Pollut. 2001;115(2):283–289. doi: 10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00101-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Carrasco-Rodriguez JL, Valle-Tascon SD. Impact of elevated ozone on chlorophyll a fluorescence in field-grown oat (Avena sativa) Environ Exp Bot. 2001;45(2):133–142. doi: 10.1016/S0098-8472(00)00085-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Clyde Hill A, Bennet JH. Inhibition of apparent photosynthesis by nitrogen oxides. Atmos Environ. 1970;4(4):341–348. doi: 10.1016/0004-6981(70)90078-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Darrall NM, Jäger HJ. Biochemical Diagnostic Tests for the Effects of Air Pollution on Plants. In: Koziol MJ, Whatley FR, editors. Gaseous Air Pollutants and Plant Metabolism. London: Butterworth; 1984. pp. 333–350. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Della-Torre G, Ferranti F, Lupattelli M, Pocceschi N, Figoli A, Nali C, Lorenzini G. Effects of ozone on morpho-anatomy and physiology of Hedera helix . Chemosphere. 1998;36(4-5):651–656. doi: 10.1016/S0045-6535(97)10102-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Dhindsa RS, Plumb-Dhindsa P, Thorpe TA. Leaf senescence: correlated with increased levels of membrane permeability and lipid peroxidation and decreased levels of superoxide dismutase and catalase. J Exp Bot. 1981;32(1):93–101. doi: 10.1093/jxb/32.1.93. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Dixon RA, Paiva NL. Stress-induced phenylpropanoid metabolism. The Plant Cell. 1995;7(7):1085–1097. doi: 10.1105/tpc.7.7.1085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Edjolo A, Laffray D, Guerrier G. The ascorbate-glutathione cycle in the cytosolic and chloroplastic fractions of drought-tolerant and drought-sensitive poplars. J Plant Physiol. 2001;158(12):1511–1517. doi: 10.1078/0176-1617-00544. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ella ES, Kawano N, Ito O. Importance of active oxygen-scavenging system in the recovery of rice seedlings after submergence. Plant Sci. 2003;165(1):85–93. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9452(03)00146-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Foyer CH, Halliwell B. The presence of glutathione reductase in chloroplast: a proposed role in ascorbic acid metabolism. Planta. 1976;133(1):21–25. doi: 10.1007/BF00386001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Frankart C, Eullaffroy P, Vernet G. Photosynthetic responses of Lemna minor exposed to xenobiotics, copper, and their combinations. Ecotoxicol Environ Safety. 2002;53(3):439–445. doi: 10.1016/S0147-6513(02)00003-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Genty B, Harbinson J, Briantais JM, Baker NR. The relationship between non-photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence and the rate of photosystem II photochemistry in leaves. Phytosynth Res. 1990;25(3):249–257. doi: 10.1007/BF00033166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Guidi L, Nali C, Ciompi S, Lorenzini G, Soldatini GF. The use of chlorophyll fluorescence and leaf gas exchange as methods for studying the different responses to ozone of two bean cultivars. J Exp Bot. 1997;48(1):173–179. doi: 10.1093/jxb/48.1.173. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Horemans N, Foyer CH, Potters G, Asard H. Ascorbate function and associated transport systems in plants. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2000;38(7-8):531–540. doi: 10.1016/S0981-9428(00)00782-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kuźniak E, Skłodowska M. Ascorbate, glutathione and related enzymes in chloroplasts of tomato leaves infected by Botrytis cinerea . Plant Sci. 2001;160(4):723–731. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9452(00)00457-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lee EH, Bennett JH. Superoxide dismutase, a possible protective enzyme against ozone injury in snap beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Plant Physiol. 1982;69(6):1444–1449. doi: 10.1104/pp.69.6.1444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lai QX, Bao ZY, Zhu ZJ, Qian QQ, Mao BZ. Effects of osmotic stress on antioxidant enzymes activities in leaf discs of PSAG12-IPT modified gerbera. J Zhejiang Univ-Sci B. 2007;8(7):458–464. doi: 10.1631/jzus.2007.B0458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lichtenthaler HK. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Methods in Enzymology. 1987;148:350–382. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(87)48036-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Liu YG, Wang X, Zeng GM, Qu D, Gu J, Zhou M, Chai LY. Cadmium-induced oxidative stress and response of the ascorbate-glutathione cycle in Bechmeria nivea (L.) Gaud. Chemosphere. 2007;69(1):99–107. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.04.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Maggs R, Ashmore MR. Growth and yield responses of Pakistan rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars to O3 and NO2 . Environ Pollut. 1998;103(2-3):159–170. doi: 10.1016/S0269-7491(98)00129-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Makino A, Osmond B. Effects of nitrogen nutrition on nitrogen partitioning between chloroplasts and mitochondria in pea and wheat. Plant Physiol. 1991;96(2):355–362. doi: 10.1104/pp.96.2.355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Marie BA, Ormrod DP. Tomato plant growth with continuous exposure to sulphur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide. Environ Pollut (Ser A) 1984;33(3):257–265. doi: 10.1016/0143-1471(84)90015-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Maxwell K, Johnson GN. Chlorophyll fluorescence–a practical guide. J Exp Bot. 2000;51(345):659–668. doi: 10.1093/jexbot/51.345.659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Mehlhorn H, Óshea JM, Wellburn AR. Atmospheric ozone interacts with stress ethylene formation by plants to cause visible plant injury. J Exp Bot. 1991;42(1):17–24. doi: 10.1093/jxb/42.1.17. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Meloni DA, Oliva MA, Martinez CA, Cambraia J. Photosynthesis and activity of superoxide dismutase, peroxidase and glutathione reductase in cotton under salt stress. Environ Exp Bot. 2003;49(1):69–76. doi: 10.1016/S0098-8472(02)00058-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ministry of the Environmental Protection of the People’s Republic of China. EPA. 2007 Available from http://www.sepa.gov.cn/ztbd/sjhjr/2007hjr/tpbd56/200706/P020070625532626111313.pdf. [accessed on Jan. 2, 2009] (in Chinese)
- 30.Okano K, Totsuka T, Fukuzawa T, Tazaki T. Growth responses of plants to various concentrations of nitrogen dioxide. Environ Pollut (Ser A) 1985;38(4):361–373. doi: 10.1016/0143-1471(85)90107-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Pan LQ, Ren JY, Liu J. Responses of antioxidant system and LPO level to benzo(a)pyrene and benzo(k)fluoranthene in the haemolymph of the scallop Chlamys ferrari . Environ Pollut. 2006;141(3):443–451. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2005.08.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Pandey J, Agrawal M. Growth responses of tomato plants to low concentrations of sulphur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide. Scientia Horticulturae. 1994;58(1-2):67–76. doi: 10.1016/0304-4238(94)90128-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Pleijel H, Skärby L, Ojanperä K, Selldén G. Exposure of oats, Avena sativa L., to filtered and unfiltered air in open-top chambers: effects on grain yield and quality. Environ Pollut. 1994;86(2):129–134. doi: 10.1016/0269-7491(94)90183-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Potters G, Gara LD, Asard H, Horemans N. Ascorbate and glutathione: guardians of the cell cycle, partners in crime? Plant Physiol Biochem. 2002;40(6-8):537–548. doi: 10.1016/S0981-9428(02)01414-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Price A, Lucas PW, Lea PJ. Age dependent damage and glutathione metabolism in ozone fumigated barley: a leaf section approach. J Exp Bot. 1990;41(10):1309–1317. doi: 10.1093/jxb/41.10.1309. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Qiao Z, Murray F. The effects of NO2 on the uptake and assimilation of nitrate by soybean plants. Environ Exp Bot. 1998;39(1):33–40. doi: 10.1016/S0098-8472(97)00023-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ra HSY, Geiser LH, Crang RFE. Effects of season and low-level air pollution on physiology and element content of lichens from the U.S. Pacific Northwest. Sci Total Environ. 2005;343(1-3):155–167. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Rai V, Vajpayee P, Singh SN, Mehrotra S. Effect of chromium accumulation on photosynthetic pigments, oxidative stress defense system, nitrate reduction, proline level and eugenol content of Ocimum tenuiflorum L. Plant Sci. 2004;167(5):1159–1169. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2004.06.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ramge P, Badeck FW, Plochl M. Apoplastic antioxidants as decisive elimination factors within the uptake process of nitrogen dioxide into leaf tissues. New Phytol. 1993;125(4):771–785. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1993.tb03927.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Rice-Evans CA, Miller NJ, Paganga G. Structure-antioxidant activity relationship of flavonoids and phenolic acids. Free Radic Biol Med. 1996;20(7):933–956. doi: 10.1016/0891-5849(95)02227-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Sabaratnam S, Gupat G. Effects of nitrogen dioxide on biochemical and physiological characteristics of soybean. Environ Pollut. 1988;55(2):149–158. doi: 10.1016/0269-7491(88)90125-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sabaratnam S, Gupat G, Mulchi C. Effects of nitrogen dioxide on leaf chlorophyll and nitrogen content of soybean. Environ Pollut. 1988;51(2):113–120. doi: 10.1016/0269-7491(88)90200-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Sakaki T, Kondo N, Sugahara K. Breakdown of photosynthetic pigments and lipids in spinach leaves with ozone fumigation: role of active oxygens. Physiol Plantarum. 1983;59(1):28–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1983.tb06566.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Shalata A, Tal M. The effect of salt stress on lipid peroxidation and antioxidants in the leaf of the cultivated tomato and its wild salt-tolerant relative Lycopersicon pennellii . Physiol Plant. 1998;104(2):169–174. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3054.1998.1040204.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Shimazaki K, Yu SW, Sakaki T, Tanaka K. Differences between spinach and kidney bean plants in terms of sensitivity to fumigation with NO2 . Plant Cell Physiol. 1992;33(3):267–273. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Smirnoff N. The function and metabolism of ascorbic acid in plants. Ann Bot. 1996;78(6):661–669. doi: 10.1006/anbo.1996.0175. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Takahashi M, Higaki A, Nohno M, Kamada M, Okamura Y, Matsui K, Kitani S, Morikawa H. Differential assimilation of nitrogen dioxide by 70 taxa of roadside trees at an urban pollution level. Chemosphere. 2005;61(5):633–639. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.03.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Tian DL, Fu XP, Fang X, Xiang WH. Effect of simulated acid rain on photosynthetic characteristics in Cinnamomum camphora seedlings. Scientia Silvae Sinicae. 2007;43:29–35. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- 49.Walmsley L, Ashmore MR, Bell JNB. Adaptation of radish Raphanus sativus L. in response to continuous exposure to ozone. Environ Pollut (Ser A) 1980;23(3):165–177. doi: 10.1016/0143-1471(80)90044-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wu YX, Tiedemann A. Impact of fungicides on active oxygen species and antioxidant enzymes in spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) exposed to ozone. Environ Pollut. 2002;116(1):37–47. doi: 10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00174-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Yu SW, Li L, Shimazaki K. Response of spinach and kidneybean plants to nitrogen dioxide. Environ Pollut. 1988;55(1):1–13. doi: 10.1016/0269-7491(88)90155-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zeevaart AJ. Some effects of fumigation plants for short periods with NO2 . Environ Pollut. 1976;11(2):97–108. doi: 10.1016/0013-9327(76)90022-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Zhang LL, Lin YM. Tannins from Canarium album with potent antioxidant activity. J Zhejiang Univ-Sci B. 2008;9(5):407–415. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B0820002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Zheng WJ. Chinese Tree Records. Volume 1. Beijing, China: Chinese Forestry Press; 1983. p. 749. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]







