Abstract
Previous studies showed that loss of muscarinic parasympathetic input to the lacrimal gland (LG) leads to a dramatic reduction in tear secretion and profound changes to LG structure. In this study, we used DNA microarrays to examine the regulation of the gene expression of the genes for secretory function and organization of the LG. Long-Evans rats anesthetized with a mixture of ketamine/xylazine (80:10 mg/kg) underwent unilateral sectioning of the greater superficial petrosal nerve, the input to the pterygopalatine ganglion. After 7 days, tear secretion was measured, the animals were killed, and structural changes in the LG were examined by light microscopy. Total RNA from control and experimental LGs (n = 5) was used for DNA microarray analysis employing the U34A GeneChip. Three statistical algorithms (detection, change call, and signal log ratio) were used to determine differential gene expression using the Microarray Suite (5.0) and Data Mining Tools (3.0). Tear secretion was significantly reduced and corneal ulcers developed in all experimental eyes. Light microscopy showed breakdown of the acinar structure of the LG. DNA microarray analysis showed downregulation of genes associated with the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi, including genes involved in protein folding and processing. Conversely, transcripts for cytoskeleton and extracellular matrix components, inflammation, and apoptosis were upregulated. The number of significantly upregulated genes (116) was substantially greater than the number of downregulated genes (49). Removal of the main secretory input to the rat LG resulted in clinical symptoms associated with severe dry eye. Components of the secretory pathway were negatively affected, and the increase in cell proliferation and inflammation may lead to loss of organization in the parasympathectomized lacrimal gland.
Keywords: muscarinic, dry eye
The exocrine lacrimal gland (LG) is the major secretory source of the tear proteins and electrolytes that are essential for the health of the cornea and ocular surface. The cornea and LG, together with other secretory tissues of the surface of the eye and the associated sensory, sympathetic, and parasympathetic nerves, form a functional unit to maintain the health of the ocular surface and the transparency of the cornea (64, 65). Conceptually, this model suggests that neural systems, linked through the central nervous system (CNS), provide homeostatic control of the ocular surface. In response to environmental signals, sensory nerves relay environmental status information from the surface of the eye to the CNS. In the brain stem, neural information is processed by preganglionic parasympathetic neurons and finally relayed to the peripheral parasympathetic ganglia whose axons supply the secretory drive to the LG. Acetylcholine, released nonsynaptically within the LG from parasympathetic nerves, is acknowledged to be the principal route for stimulation of the largely M3 muscarinic cholinergic receptors located on the membranes of the LG acinar cells (42, 45, 75, 76).
We have previously shown that sensory innervation plays a role in this functional unit in the rabbit (41, 57, 71) and rat (50). In the rabbit, sensory input was eliminated by ablating a portion of the trigeminal ganglion containing the cell bodies whose axons receive sensory input from the surface of the eye. This resulted in structural changes in the organization of the LG and increased secretory responsiveness to in vitro stimulation of the LG acinar cells with carbachol, a cholinergic agonist (41, 57). Interrupting the neural outflow of the functional unit by permanently severing the preganglionic parasympathetic outflow from the CNS produced more severe structural alterations of the LG, as well as significantly decreased tear flow within 24 h and pathological changes to the ocular surface by 7 days (71).
In the rat, the overall effect of the functional unit was tested by sectioning the preganglionic nerve, which resulted in reduced tear flow and clinical symptoms including disruption of the integrity of the surface of the eye (50). LG structure was also affected.
In our model of ocular surface homeostasis, constant muscarinic stimulation of LG secretion was suggested by regulation of the physiological activity of the parasympathetic ganglion from the CNS. It was also found that, without constant stimulation, the LG had no intrinsic ability to secrete (71). Interruption of neural outflow for tear secretion from the LG also affected components of translation and could lead to alteration in protein synthesis and processing (49). Thus we hypothesized that muscarinic stimulation controls a network of genes responsible for maintaining the secretory function of the LG epithelial cell.
Tissues are known to show adaptive changes in response to innervational status. Our model of the relationship between the innervation of the ocular surface and the target/secretory tissues suggests that this type of relationship may also hold true for the expression of genes. Modulation of gene expression in skeletal systems is probably the best-studied tissue model, and neural influences of both normal and aged muscle have been described (16, 24, 30). More recent studies on the autonomic innervation of the salivary and other glands have shown a significant but diverse range of effects on function and morphology (20, 21, 60, 69). Rossi et al. (55) reported reduced tear production with dry eye-like symptoms in neurturin-related neurotrophic factor-deficient mice lacking parasympathetic innervation to the harderian glands and LG. Additionally, in mice lacking the M3 muscarinic receptor (M3R), the salivary secretory response to cholinergic stimulation was reduced (40). The functional importance of muscarinic parasympathetic input to lacrimal secretion is well established; however, the role of muscarinic parasympathetic innervation in the regulation of genes associated with secretory function in exocrine tissues is unclear.
With DNA microarray technology, it is possible to examine the conditional regulation of many genes simultaneously, thus gaining a better understanding of gene function, interactions, and regulation. Because there is no functional cross-innervation between the two LGs of an individual animal and both exist under the same physiological conditions, gene expression in the contralateral LG provides an appropriate baseline level for determining muscarinic parasympathetic control of gene expression in the LG (28). DNA microarrays have been used in the LG to profile gene expression patterns associated with gender and Sjögren syndrome (4, 54).
In this study, we carried out gene expression profiling in the rat LG after removal of the preganglionic parasympathetic control of secretion. The identification of patterns of gene expression provides insights into genes that are conditionally linked to parasympathetic secretory control.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Preganglionic parasympathetic denervation
Male Long-Evans rats (200–250 g) were purchased from Harlan Laboratories (Bethesda, MD). All animal studies were carried out in accordance with the ARVO Statement on the Use of Animals in Research in Vision and Ophthalmology and with approval from the Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). Controlled parasympathetic denervation was carried out in the same manner as previously developed for the rabbit by sectioning and removing several millimeters of the greater superficial petrosal nerve (GSPN) using a middle ear approach (71). All animals undergoing surgery were anesthetized with a mixture of ketamine/ xylazine (80:10 mg/kg) delivered intramuscularly. One sham-operated rat was prepared. The GSPN was identified but not sectioned. The cornea and conjunctiva were evaluated by slit-lamp examination using instillations of fluorescein and rose bengal; these dyes are used clinically to disclose disruptions in the cell layers covering the surface of the eye. Tear secretion was measured from both the parasympathectomized (Px) and normally innervated, contralateral control (Ctla) sides using the Schirmer tear test, which was carried out by placing a 1-mm strip of Schirmer test paper in the cul-de-sac of the eye for 5 min.
Animals were killed with an overdose of pentobarbital sodium, and the LG was removed through a skin incision from the Ctla and Px sides. A 2 mm × 2 mm fragment of LG tissue was fixed for light microscopy; the remaining tissue was frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen. For structural analysis, the tissues from the Ctla and Px sides were placed in a mixed aldehyde solution containing 2% glutaraldehyde and 1% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2) containing 0.2% picric acid for 4 h, and washed overnight in buffer. Plastic sections (1-µm thick) were prepared and stained with toluidine blue and photographed using a Nikon E600 microscope (41).
RNA extraction and microarray analysis
Total RNA was extracted from the experimental (n = 5) and control (n = 5) LGs [contralateral control (n = 3), normal unoperated control (n = 1), sham-operated control (n = 1)] using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). RNA integrity was determined by spectrophotometry and by formaldehyde gel electrophoresis. Procedures for cDNA synthesis, labeling, and hybridization were carried out as described at http://www.affymetrix.com/support/technical/manual/expression_manual.affx (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA). All experiments were performed using Affymetrix RG U34A GeneChips as described at http://www.affymetrix.com/products/arrays/specific/rgu34.affx. Briefly, 8 µg of total RNA was used for first-strand synthesis using HPLC-purified T7-(dT)24 primer. Synthesis of biotinylated-labeled cRNA was carried out using the ENZO RNA transcript labeling kit (Affymetrix) and processed for hybridization. For overnight hybridization, 15 µg of fragmented cDNA was used in an Affymetrix GeneChips Hybridization Oven 640, washed, stained with streptavidin-phycoerythrin using a microfluidics workstation (Affymetrix), and scanned with a confocal laser scanner (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA). Further description of the methodology according to MIAME (“minimum information about a microarray experiment”) guidelines (http://www.mged.org/Workgroups/MIAME/miame.html) is provided in the Supplementary Material (available at the Physiological Genomics web site).1
Microarray quantification and statistical analysis
Signal and background intensities were quantitated by pixel intensity, and expression signals were analyzed using Affymetrix Microarray Suite 5.0 (MAS 5.0). All array images and quality control measurements were within acceptable limits. Details of quality control measurements are provided in the Supplementary Material. Absolute expression transcript levels were normalized for each array by globally scaling all probe sets to a target signal intensity of 2,500. Three statistical algorithms [detection, change call, signal log ratio (SLR)] were then used to identify differential gene expression in control and experimental samples. The detection metric (present, marginal, or absent) was assigned to each transcript using default parameters in MAS 5.0. For comparison expression analysis, the control samples were used as a baseline, and batch analyses were performed in MAS 5.0, in which pair-wise comparisons between individual experimental and control arrays were made to generate an SLR value for each transcript.
Data and statistical analysis and data visualization were performed with LIMS 3.0 and Data Mining Tools (DMT) 3.0 (Affymetrix). Transcripts that were found absent in three of five experiments in both the control and experimental groups were eliminated from further analysis. Significant gene expression was analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test to compare the signal intensity between the Px LG and the Ctla LG. Two criteria were used to group significant changes in gene expression. First, we defined a positive change call as one in which more than 50% of the transcripts had a call of “increased” (I) or “marginally increased” (MI) for upregulated genes, and “decreased” (D) or “marginally decreased” (MD) for downregulated genes. The median value of the SLR from each comparison file was calculated using DMT 3.0. Second, genes with statistically significant changes were compared based on a percentage of present detection calls (>50%) in the five control or experimental LGs. Genes with median SLR values of >1 or less than −1 were grouped as upregulated and downregulated genes, respectively. Finally, genes were grouped based on their biological functions using Affymetrix Net-Affx, NCBI UniGene, and LocusLink. Complete microarray expression data are available at NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (GEO submissions GSM12935 through GSM12953, GSE844, NCBI tracking system 15029722) at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Ocular surface and tear secretion
Seven days after removal of parasympathetic neural control of the secretory drive to the rat LG, slit-lamp microscopy of the surface of the eyes revealed obvious pathological changes to the ocular surface. Corneal ulcers developed on the Px side in all animals (Fig. 1). The ocular surfaces of all Ctla eyes (Fig. 1) and all shamoperated eyes (not shown) appeared normal. Tear secretion significantly decreased in all Px eyes compared with the Ctla eyes, indicating a deficiency in tear flow, a consequence of the loss of muscarinic stimulation of acinar cells (Fig. 2). The loss of fluid secretion from the LG onto the ocular surface resulted in drying, abnormal cell sloughing, and loss of the epithelial barrier function as shown by fluorescein staining (71).
Fig. 1.
Slit-lamp microscopy of the rat ocular surface 7 days after parasympathectomy. Control (A) and parasympathectomy (B).
Fig. 2.
Tear output from the control (Ctla) and parasympathectomized (Px) eyes before (Pre) and 7 days after surgery. STV, Schirmer tear value.
Structural changes in the rat LG
Light microscopy of the LG showed obvious and consistent morphologic departures from the normal structure (Fig. 3). The Ctla LG revealed the lobular organization of the secretory epithelial cells that form the acini embedded in a connective tissue parenchyma characteristic of normal rat LG (59). The Px LG were disorganized and showed a loss of acinar structure, compared with the Ctla LG. Additionally, vesicles more common to endocytic or phagocytic processes were more prominent in the Px LG. The interstitium was more abundant in the Px LG, suggesting a loss or dissolution of the acinar structure. These changes are consistent with those previously reported in the rabbit; however, they were more pronounced in the rat than in the rabbit (41, 71).
Fig. 3.
Light micrographs of the lacrimal gland 7 days after parasympathectomy. A: control side. B: parasympathectomized side. Toluidine blue; original magnification ×100.
In our earlier rabbit studies, we found that secretory granules accumulated in the LG after sensory denervation (41). These results suggested that without functional muscarinic parasympathetic innervation, release of secretory proteins is reduced, leading to accumulation of secretory granules. These changes may also be related to the negative effect of removal of parasympathetic regulation of translation and secretory apparatus in the LG acinar cells, leading to reduction in the synthesis and maturation of secretory proteins. Moreover, parasympathetic innervation may provide an as-yet-unidentified type of trophic support to help maintain acinar structure and function of lacrimal acinar cells. In our studies, this trophic support was not a factor, as the experimental procedures did not alter the status of the innervation between the pterygopalatine ganglion and the LG, nor was there any intervention within the LG. In fact, the procedure did not involve any manipulation to ocular structures.
The dramatic decline in tear secretion clearly points to the absence of the muscarinic stimulation necessary to elicit tear flow. Thus, although the innervation is intact from the pterygopalatine ganglion to the LG, the results indicate that, as hypothesized, the neural signals required for the release of neurotransmitter are not available. As shown below, the results of DNA expression profiling suggest that the absence of muscarinic stimulation leads to substantial changes in levels of expression among networks of acinar cell genes.
Microarray data analysis
Based on the detection call comparison between the control and experimental LG, the number of genes expressed in the Px LG (2,792 present genes) was greater than the number in the Ctla LG (2,272 present genes). The greater numbers of expressed genes in the Px LG suggest an elevated gene transcription program in response to alterations in the organization and structure of the LG. The upregulated gene expression pattern may be a compensatory or stress response by acinar cells, which make up 80% of the LG cellular mass. The loss of the major parasympathetic innervation may have an impact on LG tissue homeostasis and trigger transcriptional responses from ductal and interstitial cells.
On the basis of present to absent detection calls for comparison between the Ctla and Px LG, 18 genes were found to be significantly downregulated, only one of which was not detected in any of the experimental LG samples. However, only five genes had a median SLR value less than −1 (Table 1). Conversely, 78 genes were found to be significantly upregulated and 41 of these 78 genes were not detected in any of the five Ctla LG samples, a substantially greater number of genes than was found in the downregulated group. Twenty of the upregulated genes had a median SLR value >1 (Table 2). Given the known biological functions associated with these upregulated genes, it appeared that, without parasympathetic input to the LG, expression of proinflammatory and proapoptotic transcripts increases. Experimental comparison of statistically significant genes based on change call criteria found 45 downregulated genes and 97 upregulated genes in the Px LG (Table 3 and Table 4).
Table 1.
Transcripts present in the control lacrimal gland and absent in the parasympathectomized lacrimal gland with SLR less or equal to −1
| Accession No. | Median SLR | Description |
|---|---|---|
| S48813 | −1.88 | β-Adrenergic receptor kinase |
| M74152* | −1.36 | Prolactin receptor |
| E03344 | −1.24 | Peroxisome forming factor |
| U51898 | −1.15 | Ca2+-independent phospholipase A2 |
| AJ005046 | −1.13 | Fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase |
Expressed sequence tags (ESTs) were identified based on UniGene or LocusLink.
Gene also represented in Table 3 SLR, signal log ratio.
Table 2.
Transcripts absent in the control lacrimal gland and present in the parasympathectomized lacrimal gland with SLR ≥1
| Accession | Median | |
|---|---|---|
| No. | SLR | Description |
| U14647 | 2.46 | Interleukin-1β converting enzyme (caspase 1) |
| U10894 | 2.41 | mRNA expressed in carotid artery tissue |
| D12524 | 1.48 | c-kit receptor tyrosine kinase |
| U77933 | 1.2 | Nedd2/Ich-1 (caspase 2) |
| U17919 | 1.13 | Allograft inflammatory factor-1 |
| AF025670 | 1.08 | Caspase 6 |
| M64986 | 1.14 | Amphoterin |
| AF086758* | 1.74 | Na-K-2Cl cotransporter (Nkcc1) |
| U49099 | 1.05 | cis-Golgi p28 |
| M18416 | 1.14 | Nerve growth factor-induced (NGFI-A) gene |
| L07114 | 1.75 | Apolipoprotein B mRNA editing protein |
| L22339 | 2.34 | N-hydroxy-2-acetylaminofluorene (ST1C1) |
| S56937 | 1.38 | UDP-glucuronosyltransferase |
| AA926129 | 1.08 | SOD-2 |
| AA800844 | 1 | Protein-lysine 6-oxidase precursor |
| D00753 | 1.03 | Contrapsin-like protease inhibitor related protein (CPi-26) |
| S72637 | 1.51 | Tumor suppressive gene |
| X03347 | 1.99 | Unknown |
| AA799507 | 1.96 | Unknown |
| AA893663 | 1.3 | Unknown |
ESTs were identified based on UniGene or LocusLink.
Gene also represented in Table 4.
Table 3.
Significant genes with >50% decrease change call
| Median | ||
|---|---|---|
| Accession No. | SLR | Description |
| Translocation | ||
| AA685175 | −1.55 | Ribosome binding protein 1 isoform mRRp61 |
| AF100470 | −1.28 | Ribosome attached membrane protein 4 (RAMP4) |
| M96630 | −0.73 | sec61 homolog |
| X55298 | −0.66 | ribophorin II |
| AA819338 | −0.65 | TRAP-delta |
| D13623 | −0.58 | p34 protein |
| Fold/process | ||
| S63521* | −1.31 | Glucose-regulated protein GRP78 |
| 02918 | −1.27 | Protein disulphide isomerase |
| D78308 | −1.11 | Calreticulin |
| X55660 | −1.1 | Furin |
| M14050* | −1.08 | Immunoglobulin heavy chain binding protein (BiP) |
| AA875098 | −1.0 | FK506 binding protein precursor |
| AA891161 | −0.79 | Probable ER oxidoreductin 1-beta homolog |
| AF071225 | −0.47 | Cyclophilin B |
| Glycosylation | ||
| D87991 | −1.22 | UDP-galactose transporter related isozyme 1 |
| AF087431 | −0.81 | Glycoprotein processing glucosidase I |
| AA891937 | −0.67 | Dolichyl-di-phosphooligosaccharide-protein glycotransferase |
| Vesicle transport/ transporter |
||
| AJ004912 | −0.73 | Integral membrane protein Tmp21-I (p23) |
| U18771 | −0.56 | rab26 |
| Protein synthesis | ||
| AB015432 | −2.0 | LAT1 (L-type amino acid transporter 1) |
| X89225 | −0.9 | 4F2hc surface antigen |
| U05014 | −0.73 | PHAS-I |
| Signaling | ||
| J02705 | − 1.66 | Oncomodulin |
| L27081 | − 1.52 | Melanocortin 5 receptor (MC5R) |
| M74152 | − 1.36 | Prolactin receptor |
| AB007690 | −1.14 | Vesl-2 (delta 11) |
| Y08355 | −0.73 | PKC-zeta-interacting protein |
| AA892649 | −0.74 | γ-Aminobutyric acid receptor associated Protein |
| AA957510 | −0.73 | Sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase 2 (SERCA2) |
| AA891209 | −0.71 | Interleukin 25 |
| X13933 | −0.55 | Calmodulin |
| Metabolism- mitochondria |
||
| AI012802 | −1.24 | Hydroxyacyl glutathione hydrolase; glyoxalase II |
| M89945 | −1.08 | Farnesyl diphosphate synthase gene |
| J04791 | −0.94 | Ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) |
| J03914 | −0.75 | Glutathione S-transferase Yb subunit gene |
| D13123 | −0.65 | P1 mRNA for ATP synthase subunit c |
| Protein metabolism | ||
| J04206 | −1.56 | Cystatin S |
| X16273 | −1.42 | Serine proteinase inhibitor-like protein |
| AI010453 | −0.83 | α1-antitrypsin |
| Unassigned | ||
| Y13336 | −1.09 | Defender against cell death 1 (DAD-1) |
| L20900 | −0.94 | Autoantigen p69 |
| AF008554 | −0.76 | Implantation-associated protein (IAG2) |
| S75019 | −0.66 | Antiquitin |
| AI639365 | −0.9 | Unknown |
| AA799822 | −0.69 | Unknown |
| AA800034 | −0.52 | Unknown |
The transcripts from these genes were decreased in the parasympathectomized lacrimal gland with a >50% change call (decrease, marginal decrease).
ESTs were identified based on Unigene or LocusLink.
Same gene with different accession numbers.
Table 4.
Significant genes with >50% increase change call
| Median | ||
|---|---|---|
| Accession No. | SLR | Description |
| Extracellular | ||
| U00964 | 3.51 | Common salivary protein 1 |
| AA891204 | 2.11 | Secreted acidic cysteine-rich glycoprotein (SPARC) |
| X07648 | 1.9 | Amyloidogenic glycoprotein (rAG) |
| AA891054 | 1.52 | Mucin 2 precursor |
| X05834 | 1.37 | Fibronectin |
| S72594 | 1.35 | Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase type 2 (TIMP-2) |
| U32681 | 1.28 | Ebnerin |
| Y13275 | 1.68 | D6.1A protein |
| AF065438 | 1.19 | Mama |
| U07619 | 1.18 | Tissue factor protein |
| AA800318 | 1.16 | Plasma protease C1 inhibitor precursor |
| X59859 | 1.03 | Decorin |
| AI231292 | 0.95 | Cystatin C |
| M81231 | 0.92 | Pulmonary surfactant protein (SP-D) |
| AI012030 | 0.88 | Matrix Gla protein |
| M31322 | 0.69 | Sperm membrane protein (YWK-II) |
| Cell structure | ||
| S77900 | 2.13 | Myosin regulatory light chain isoform C |
| AA892506 | 2.08 | Coronin, actin binding protein 1A |
| M83107 | 2.02 | SM22 |
| X81449 | 1.6 | Keratin 19 |
| AF002281 | 1.37 | α-actinin-2 associated LIM protein |
| L00382 | 1.07 | β-tropomyosin and fibroblast tropomyosin 1 |
| M15474 | 0.76 | α-tropomyosin |
| M60666 | 0.67 | α-tropomyosin 2 |
| X52815 | 0.62 | Cytoplasmic-γ isoform of actin |
| AI072634* | 0.71 | Keratin complex 1, acidic, gene 18 |
| X81448* | 0.44 | Keratin 18 |
| AA860030 | 0.39 | β-tubulin (isotype Mbeta 5) |
| Immunity and inflammation |
||
| Y08358 | 2.1 | Eotaxin |
| X52477 | 1.89 | Pre-pro-complement C3 |
| AA799803 | 1.82 | Complement C1r component precursor |
| M15562 | 1.34 | MHC class II RT1.u-D-alpha chain |
| X14323 | 1.21 | IgG receptor FcRn large subunit p51 |
| X14254 | 1 | MHC class II-associated invariant chain |
| M57276 | 0.99 | Leukocyte antigen MRC-OX44 |
| L26267 | 0.76 | Nuclear factor kappa B p105 subunit |
| M28671 | 0.73 | Rearranged IgG-2b gene |
| AF029240 | 0.72 | MHC class Ib RT1.S3 (RT1.S3) |
| K02815 | 0.7 | MHC class II RT1-β alpha chain) |
| M36151 | 0.67 | MHC class II A-beta RT1.B-b-beta gene |
| Protein metabolism | ||
| S81497 | 2.57 | Lysosomal acid lipase |
| AI177256 | 1.38 | Lysosomal membrane glycoprotein 1 |
| X98517 | 1.27 | Macrophage metalloelastase |
| D10729 | 0.95 | Proteasome subunit RC1 |
| AI172162 | 0.35 | Proteasome (prosome, macropain), beta type 4 |
| Signaling | ||
| AI171962 | 2.23 | Annexin 1 |
| L13039 | 1.57 | Annexin II |
| M60753 | 1.29 | Catechol-O-methyltransferase |
| AA858617 | 1.03 | TC10-like Rho GTPase |
| X67788 | 0.85 | Ezrin p81 |
| X60769 | 0.7 | Silencer factor B |
| D85183 | 0.69 | SHPS-1 |
| U18314 | 0.67 | Lamina associated polypeptide 2 (LAP2) |
| J05122 | 0.65 | Peripheral-type benzodiazepine receptor (PKBS) |
| AA899253 | 0.64 | Myristoylated alanine-rich C-kinase substrate (MARCKS) |
| AI234604 | 0.55 | Similar to 70-kDa heat-shock-like protein |
| M11942 | 0.42 | 70-kDa Heat-shock-like protein |
| Metabolism- mitochondria |
||
| U18729 | 2.07 | Cytochrome b558 α-subunit |
| D13122 | 1.13 | ATPase inhibitor protein |
| AA892314 | 0.81 | Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 |
| AI172411 | 0.7 | Glutathione peroxidase 3 |
| M26125 | 0.48 | Epoxide hydrolase |
| M84716 | 0.34 | Fte-1 |
| AI169802 | 0.67 | Ferritin, heavy polypeptide 1 |
| M34043 | 0.66 | Thymosin β-4 |
| Ribosome | ||
| J03969 | 1.06 | Nucleolar protein B23 |
| M12156 | 0.8 | hnRNP A1 |
| X15216 | 0.65 | Ribosomal protein L21 |
| AI008641 | 0.62 | Ribosomal protein L22 |
| X51707 | 0.6 | Ribosomal protein S19 |
| AA850940 | 0.53 | Ribosomal protein L4 |
| AI177683 | 0.52 | hnRNP protein |
| AI104544 | 0.51 | Ribosomal protein S17 |
| M55015 | 0.51 | Nucleolin gene |
| M29358 | 0.5 | Ribosomal protein S6 |
| AA875102 | 0.5 | Small nuclear ribonucleoprotein E |
| X57432 | 0.48 | Ribosomal protein S2 |
| 53504 | 0.47 | Ribosomal protein L12 |
| AA799899 | 0.46 | Ribosomal protein L18a |
| X62166 | 0.42 | Ribosomal protein L3 |
| 58465 | 0.41 | Ribosomal protein S5 |
| AA817997 | 0.4 | Ribosomal protein L24 |
| M34331 | 0.39 | Ribosomal subunit protein L35 |
| X52733 | 0.38 | Ribosomal protein L27a |
| M17419 | 0.38 | Ribosomal protein L5 |
| X14671 | 0.37 | Ribosomal protein L26 |
| AA849038 | 0.3 | Ribosomal protein L31 |
| AA891729 | 0.25 | Ribosomal protein S27a |
| Transport | ||
| X04979 | 1.85 | Apolipoprotein E |
| AF051561 | 0.67 | Na-K-Cl cotransporter (Nkcc1) |
| M15882 | 0.45 | Clathrin light chain (LCA1) |
| Unassigned | ||
| X0726 | 2.32 | Gene 33 polypeptide |
| AI639107 | 2.04 | Unknown |
| AA893088 | 1.14 | Unknown |
| AA892986 | 1.13 | Unknown |
| AI176460 | 0.96 | Unknown |
| U77829 | 0.94 | gas-5 growth arrest homolog |
| AA874803 | 0.74 | Unknown |
The transcripts from these genes were increased in the parasympathectomized lacrimal gland, with >50% change call.
ESTs were identified based on UniGene or LocusLink.
Same gene with different accession numbers.
Based on the ocular surface changes seen in both rat and rabbit models, it was hypothesized that the expression and synthesis of secretory proteins would be adversely affected after removal of the parasympathetic control (71). Analysis of the list of downregulated transcripts for putative secretory proteins found only a few such genes (Table 1 and Table 3). Since the messages for secretory proteins have long half-lives (>6 h) and are often found associated with ribonucleoprotein complexes, the transcriptional regulation may not change rapidly after the loss of stimulation. On the other hand, loss of muscarinic stimulation may have a nondestabilizing effect on secretory protein mRNAs, as was found for amylase mRNA in the parotid gland after cholinergic stimulation (37).
Cellular mechanisms controlling mRNA translation operate most efficiently at the initiation step of protein synthesis. The gene for PHAS-I, a heat- and acid-stable protein also known as eIF4E-binding protein 1, was significantly downregulated (Table 3). PHAS-I is a regulator of the initiation step of protein translation (51). However, regulation of secretory proteins is thought to occur at the elongation step of protein synthesis and involve the Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent elongation factor-2 kinase, which was not found to be significantly changed in the Px LG (31). These results suggest that either the initiation step of translation was generally downregulated and/or that selective translation of mRNA is occurring in the Px LG. Accordingly, decreased expression of the L-type amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1) and 4F2hc surface antigen suggests that protein synthesis is decreased in the Px LG (Table 3). As such, it is possible that downstream pathways for secretory protein maturation involving protein folding, processing, and modification in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and Golgi may be affected by the lack of muscarinic cholinergic stimulation.
As shown in Table 3, 17 genes associated with protein translocation, folding, and glycosylation in the ER and Golgi were found to have significant changes, and 9 of these 17 genes were downregulated more than twofold. The majority of these downregulated genes are ER-resident proteins, which suggests that protein folding and processing are severely affected by removal of the secretory input.
Furin is a serine endopeptidase localized mainly in the trans-Golgi network. It is associated with proteolytic processing and maturation of precursor proteins into their bioactive form and may also play a role in protein processing of improperly folded membrane proteins in the ER (5, 48). Some of the substrates for furin include transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), matrix metalloproteinase 1 (MMP1), β-nerve growth factor, and insulin-like growth factor (48, 72). Another ER-Golgi protein processing activity that may be affected is the UDP-galactose transporter. This Golgi-associated protein is involved in the posttranslational modification of proteoglycan, a critical and rate-limiting step necessary for proper localization and insertion into the plasma membrane and extracellular matrix (62, 70).
A number of other genes involved in protein translocation, folding and processing, and transport were found to be significantly downregulated, but less than twofold, including ribophorin II, translocon-associated protein (TRAP), p34, sec61, dolichyl-di-phosphooligosaccharide-protein glycotransferase, and rab26 (Table 3). Overall, based on the biological processes associated with these genes, synthesis of secretory proteins does not appear to be affected, probably because translation of mRNA for secretory proteins is regulated at the elongation step (31).
By contrast, protein quality control and translocation and transport through the lumen of the ER and Golgi do appear to be adversely affected by the lack of muscarinic stimulation, which reduces the capacity for regulated secretion of protein in the LG acinar cells. However, expression of ribosomal protein was upregulated in the Px LG, suggesting an increase in transcription of ribosomal DNA and ribosomal protein genes (Table 4). This situation is counterintuitive, as protein synthesis is directly related to the status of ribosomal genesis. It is more likely that the expression pattern of upregulated ribosomal protein genes found in the Px LG is a consequence of posttranslational stabilization of the messages that may be correlated with a reduction in protein synthesis.
The development of denervation-induced supersensitivity in target tissues has been reported to involve changes in receptor number in the target tissues, including the rat salivary gland (67). In the rabbit LG, supersensitivity was seen following preganglionic parasympathetic and sensory denervation. Stimulation of LG fragments in vitro with carbachol (a cholinergic agonist) resulted in a significant increase in the amount of protein released (41, 49). In the present study, however, the expression of M3R found predominantly in acinar cells was not significantly different 7 days after the GSPN was severed. Similarly, no significant change in the vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor (VIP-R) was found, even though VIP-R colocalizes with acetylcholine in the parasympathetic nerve terminal. Real-time RT-PCR also confirmed that the change in M3R expression was not statistically significant. (Details of M3R expression are available in the Supplementary Materials.) The absence of an increase in the expression of M3R in the parotid gland after unilateral postganglionic parasympathetic denervation has been reported, suggesting that other changes in the parotid gland may contribute to the supersensitivity response (2, 67). The reported experimental procedure was somewhat different from that of the present study in that the nerves to the LG remained intact. Since the expression of these receptors was not changed in the present study, it is possible that components of the intracellular signaling pathways associated with either muscarinic or VIP receptor activation may become more sensitized or coupled more efficiently to downstream targets. On the other hand, as in the case of the Ins(1,4,5)P3/Ca2+ and protein kinase C signal cascade, one branch may be preferentially activated after the loss of muscarinic stimulation.
Calcium released from intracellular stores stimulates secretion and serves as an important signaling and sensor molecule in the cytosol (8). Depletion of Ca2+ from the ER leads to accumulation of misfolded proteins, activates expression of ER chaperones, and inhibits protein translation (9). Removal of parasympathetic control, which would have the effect of decreasing muscarinic parasympathetic stimulation, may in fact serve as a trigger to mediate a cellular stress response. Thus one would expect that without stimulation-induced Ca2+ release, secretion would be reduced and expression of cytoplasmic and ER chaperones would not be altered. We found that mRNAs for protein disulfide isomerase (PDI), calreticulin, immunoglobulin heavy chain binding protein (BiP) [also known as the glucose-regulated protein-78 (GRP78)], and FK506 binding protein were significantly decreased, most greater than twofold. Cyclophilin B, a peptidyl prolyl isomerase that is also found in the ER, was also significantly decreased (Table 3). PDI catalyzes disulfide formation critical for folding and assembly of secretory proteins (19, 26, 43). In the absence of muscarinic activation, mobilization and depletion of Ca2+ stores in the ER do not take place, and the molecular chaperones and disulfide isomerases necessary for proper maturation of secretory and membrane proteins are not needed.
In the LG, as well as in the salivary gland and pancreas, Ca2+ is released from the ER store by activation of the Ins(1,4,5)P3 receptors and then taken up by SERCA, a Ca2+-ATPase of the ER, after the secretory signal ceases (33). The Ca2+ storage capacity in the ER is modulated and enhanced by Ca2+-binding proteins to maintain cellular Ca2+ homeostasis. Several Ca2+-binding proteins were found to be significantly downregulated, including calreticulin, oncomodulin (also known as parvalbumin-β), and calmodulin (Table 3). These Ca2+-binding proteins also serve as modulators of Ca2+-mobilizing stimuli and as regulators of the cytoskeletal contractile apparatus (8, 44). Additionally, calreticulin has been shown to modulate transcriptional activity of nuclear hormone receptors such as the androgen receptor and retinoic acid receptor, which are known to have a profound effect in maintaining LG function (15, 46). Calmodulin, an effector of Ca2+-mediated secretion of the Ins(1,4,5)P3/Ca2+ pathway, is also a member of this superfamily; its expression was also significantly decreased. The downregulation of these Ca2+-binding proteins and effectors affects the cell’s ability to respond to agonist-mediated inositol-dependent Ca2+ from the ER, with limited consequences on Ca2+ storage capacity in the ER (15, 36). Additionally, expression of a Ca2+-independent phospholipase A2 was significantly downregulated in the Px LG (Table 1), which may affect membrane lipid hydrolysis and transmembrane ion flux (38). The expression of the Ca2+-binding proteins may be under parasympathetic control, and the decreased expression of these proteins resulting from the lack of parasympathetic input may lead to the inability or reduced capacity of the Px LG to respond to hormonal stimulation.
Annexin represents a class of Ca2+-binding proteins also known as the lipocortin protein family (8). In this study, expression of annexin I and annexin II were both upregulated (Table 4). Annexins are cytosolic and associated with the membrane or the cytoskeleton, binding phospholipid in a calcium-dependent manner. The annexin family of proteins plays a role in mediation of the steroid anti-inflammatory response, membrane aggregation and fusion, endocytosis and exocytosis, and apoptosis (3, 7, 52). Since these proteins bind cellular phospholipids, it is plausible that there may be an increase in membrane phospholipid metabolism, thereby affecting exocytotic and endocytotic processes (7). Similarly, increased expression of annexin I has been implicated in the membrane clustering mediation of the phagocytosis of apoptotic cells (3). In cells where annexin I was overexpressed, calcium release was abrogated on stimulation of purinergic or bradykinin receptors. However, basal calcium and calcium stores in the ER and mitochondria were not affected (27). The increase in annexin I expression and activity may affect Ca2+ release from Ins(P)3-sensitive stores, an impairment that may be attributed to the lack of phospholipase C activity from loss of muscarinic cholinergic stimulation in the Px LG.
Initially, the LG acinar cell secretion is an NaCl-rich, plasma-like fluid. This fluid is modified by LG ductal cells, primarily by NaCl absorption, to produce a final KCl-rich fluid (47). Accordingly, stimulation via Ca2+ agonists enhances fluid exchange and transport by upregulating acinar NKCC1 cotransporter and Na+/K+ exchange activity (22). This cotransporter has been found in both acinar cells and duct cells and plays an important role in volume regulation. Treatment with a specific blocker of NKCC1 has been shown to reduce LG fluid secretion in response to carbachol (72). In the salivary glands of mice deficient in NKCC1, a severe deficit in saliva secretion in vivo was reported (23). This may be the result of a deficiency in Cl− uptake as acinar Cl− influx was reduced in vitro. However, in the present study, NKCC1 expression was upregulated in the absence of parasympathetic activation. This contradicts the expectation that downregulation of NKCC1 would occur in the face of diminished tear secretion in the Px LG as measured by the Schirmer tear test (71). It is possible that this is a compensatory mechanism responding to osmotic challenge and that other compensatory mechanisms may also exist and be activated in response to a decreased muscarinic signaling system.
The hormonal milieu of the LG also plays an important role in modulating LG secretion and function. Melanocortin-5 receptor (MC5R) is abundantly expressed in exocrine tissues, specifically in the acinar cells of the LG (10, 34). In this study, expression of MC5R was significantly downregulated in the Px LG. Melanocortin-stimulating hormone (MSH) and adrenocorticotropic thyroid hormone (ACTH) increase cAMP level in the LG and peroxidase secretion (13, 32). However, in mice deficient in MC5R, stimulation with physiological levels of MSH and ACTH did not stimulate protein secretion (10).
Another pituitary-derived peptide hormone with an important modulating role in the LG is prolactin. Prolactin has been shown to increase expression of muscarinic receptors, maintain acinar cell morphology, and affect secretion (46). Prolactin and prolactin receptors are also synthesized in the LG, and prolactin is a secretory product of acinar cells (74). Expression of prolactin receptor and MC5R was significantly decreased, with a greater than twofold reduction, in the Px LG (Table 1 and Table 3). The decreased expression of the prolactin receptor may compromise prolactin-mediated modulation of LG prolactin levels and muscarinic receptors. Previous studies suggest that this may alter the immunoregulatory environment of the LG (46).
Pathological changes in the ocular surface and LG with and without associated autoimmune components correlate with increased lymphocytic infiltration, cytokine synthesis, and apoptosis (25). In the present study, expression of many genes coding proinflammatory cytokines, complements, and proteolytic enzymes, as well as apoptotic-related gene expression, was found to be upregulated in the Px LG (Table 1 and Table 4). Interestingly, a considerable number of genes coding for the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II were also upregulated (Table 4). Generally, normal LG acinar cells do not express MHC-related genes in vivo; however, carbachol stimulation can induce expression of MHC class II genes in the LG in NZB/W mice at the age of onset of autoimmune disease and in acinar cells grown in culture (46). It is plausible that removal or loss of extracellular matrix attachment, perturbation of normal cytosolic and ER Ca2+ homeostasis, or a dramatic change in transcriptional activity may induce MHC gene expression, thus transforming normal cells into antigen-presenting cells. Moreover, protein fragments derived from lysosomal cathepsin proteolysis and engulfed cellular contents that have entered the endosomal sorting may be bound by MHC class II molecules and presented at the cell surface as antigens (68). Expression of proinflammatory and apoptotic caspases 1, 2, and 6 was significantly upregulated (Table 2). Caspase 6 is the major caspase in apoptotic cells and has been found to cleave poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and nuclear lamin A (12). DNA microarray analysis of MRL/lpr mice, one type of model of Sjögren syndrome, also showed increased expression of inflammation- and apoptosis-associated genes. However, the LGs of the mice used in that study had severe lymphocytic infiltration and represented a late stage of the disease (4). The proinflammatory and proapoptotic genes found in our study suggest an early event in the inflammatory process, in that light microscopy results did not reveal any lymphocytic infiltration.
Extracellular matrix proteins and regulatory mediators of synthesis, maintenance, and degradation were generally found to be upregulated in the LG after loss of muscarinic stimulation. Upregulated extracellular matrix proteins and secreted proteins included fibronectin, decorin, secreted acidic cysteine-rich glycoprotein (SPARC), amyloidogenic glycoprotein, and pulmonary surfactant protein (SP-D) (Table 4). SP-D, also called collectin-7, was abundantly present in the luminal contents of secretory cells, including the LG. SP-D binds carbohydrates and lipids in a calcium-dependent manner and may have a role in the innate host defense against pathogens at sites of entry into various organs (63). Cystatin C, another lipid-binding protein found to be upregulated, may be related to the lipocalin family of lipid-binding proteins and may have anti-cysteine protease properties (1, 17, 53, 56). In our study, the common salivary protein 1 (CSP1) was the most highly expressed gene found in the Px LG (SLR = 3.51). CSP1 is secreted by the salivary gland and has been localized to the intercalated duct cells of the parotid, the submandibular glands, and demilune cells of the sublingual gland (29, 61). As CSP1 had not been previously detected in the LG (29), the identification and differential expression of CSP1 found in this study may be the result of a difference in the sensitivity of the molecular technical procedure. Ebnerin, another gene that was upregulated in this experiment, is homologous to the deleted gene in malignant brain tumor 1 (DMBT1), CRT-ductin, and Hensin (6, 11, 35, 66). It has been found in association with SP-D and is also found in tear fluid (39, 58). Ebnerin’s function in the LG is also unclear, but it may, like SP-D, affect the innate immune response and, possibly, mediation of cell proliferation (6, 11, 58).
In the present study, an interesting though not surprising finding was the increased expression of genes associated with cell structure and tissue remodeling. Expression of structural proteins, including smooth muscle SM22, myosin regulatory light chain isoform C, tropomyosin, actin binding protein coronin 1A, and fibronectin, suggests increased myoepithelial and parenchymal cell activity (47). Coronin regulates non-muscle cell cytoskeleton remodeling, as well as cell adhesion and migration (14, 18). The conditions for normal tissue remodeling are favorable when the expression and activity of proteases, protease inhibitors, and extracellular matrix-associated proteins are coordinately regulated. Three genes were significantly upregulated more than twofold in the Px LG: SPARC, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase type 2 (TIMP-2), and plasma protease C1 inhibitor precursor (similar to α-1 antitrypsin). This suggests a shift in the balance of protease and protease inhibitors to a more inhibitory condition that may lead to abnormal tissue maintenance. Finally, intracellularly, expression of lysosomal membrane glycoprotein 1, lysosomal acid lipase, and proteasome subunit RC1 was upregulated, suggesting an increase in lysosomal activity and protein proteolysis.
Overall, DNA microarray analysis showed gene expression patterns shifted toward greater gene activation, possibly as part of the survival genetic response. In the absence of activation of the M3 muscarinic receptor, genes coding for components of the M3 muscarinic receptor signal transduction cascade were repressed, as were genes associated with protein synthesis and posttranslational processing. This illustrates the importance of the main neural input in protein synthesis and directly links quality control to protein processing (protein folding and glycosylation) in a secretory tissue. Precursor proteins that transit through the secretory pathway often require proteolytic cleavage to release their bioactive entities. A loss of or reduction in the capacity for this process may negatively affect the regulated secretory pathway and the proper expression of specific proteins and secretory granule genesis. Perturbation of Ca2+ homeostasis decreases the capacity of acinar cells to respond to stimuli, affects quality control of protein processing and maturation, and represents a form of stress that may trigger apoptosis. Additionally, by modulating the expression of receptors for hormones, parasympathetic innervation affects the responsiveness of acinar cells to circulating hormones such as ACTH and prolactin. The MC5R may have a direct, trophic role in maintaining lacrimal function and secretion as the MC5R–deficient rat develops alacrimia; this dysfunction was hypothesized to be the result of impairment of MC5R–coupled signal transduction pathways (34). On the other hand, parasympathetic input may be required for the maintenance of acinar epithelial differentiation and overall tissue organization, in that the current study demonstrated an increase in interstitial content including extracellular matrix production, inflammatory mediators, induction of immunity-associated genes, and proteolytic activation. Loss of parasympathetic activation of acinar cells may trigger glandular atrophy, followed by induction of apoptosis and targeting of acinar cells for destruction by infiltrating lymphocytes.
In conclusion, parasympathetic innervation and, by extension, muscarinic cholinergic stimulation are critical elements in maintaining LG structure and cellular organization. The consequences of loss of innervation may be an early step in the pathogenesis of dry eye in the clinical setting.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Juan Reynaud and Lia Pedroza-Schmidt of the LSU Eye Center for their invaluable assistance with photography and light microscopy.
GRANTS
This work was supported in part by National Eye Institute Grants R01-EY-012416 (to R. W. Beuerman) and P30-EY-002377 (departmental core grant) and by an unrestricted departmental grant from Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc., New York, NY.
Footnotes
The Supplementary Material for this article is available online at http://physiolgenomics.physiology.org/cgi/content/full/00011.2004/DC1.
REFERENCES
- 1.Abrahamson M, Grubb A, Olafsson I, Lundwall A. Molecular cloning and sequence analysis of cDNA coding for the precursor of the human cysteine proteinase inhibitor cystatin C. FEBS Lett. 1987;216:229–233. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(87)80695-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Adham N, Templeton D. Effect of parasympathetic denervation on K+ release by rat parotid slices. Gen Pharmacol. 1987;18:517–523. doi: 10.1016/0306-3623(87)90073-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Arur S, Uche UE, Rezaul K, Fong M, Scranton V, Cowan AE, Mohler W, Han DK. Annexin I is an endogenous ligand that mediates apoptotic cell engulfment. Dev Cell. 2003;4:587–598. doi: 10.1016/s1534-5807(03)00090-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Azuma T, Takei M, Yoshikawa T, Nagasugi Y, Kato M, Otsuka M, Shiraiwa H, Sugano S, Mitamura K, Sawada S, Masuho Y, Seki N. Identification of candidate genes for Sjogren’s syndrome using MRL/ lpr mouse model of Sjogren’s syndrome and cDNA microarray analysis. Immunol Lett. 2002;81:171–176. doi: 10.1016/s0165-2478(01)00344-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bass J, Turck C, Rouard M, Steiner DF. Furin-mediated processing in the early secretory pathway: sequential cleavage and degradation of misfolded insulin receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:11905–11909. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.22.11905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bisgaard HC, Holmskov U, Santoni-Rugiu E, Nagy P, Nielsen O, Ott P, Hage E, Dalhoff K, Rasmussen LJ, Tygstrup N. Heterogeneity of ductular reactions in adult rat and human liver revealed by novel expression of deleted in malignant brain tumor 1. Am J Pathol. 2002;161:1187–1198. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64395-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bitto E, Li M, Tikhonov AM, Schlossman ML, Cho W. Mechanism of annexin I-mediated membrane aggregation. Biochemistry. 2000;39:13469–13477. doi: 10.1021/bi001275u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Braunewell KH, Gundelfinger ED. Intracellular neuronal calcium sensor proteins: a family of EF-hand calcium-binding proteins in search of a function. Cell Tissue Res. 1999;295:1–12. doi: 10.1007/s004410051207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Brostrom CO, Brostrom MA. Calcium-dependent regulation of protein synthesis in intact mammalian cells. Annu Rev Physiol. 1990;52:577–590. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.52.030190.003045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chen W, Kelly MA, Opitz-Araya X, Thomas RE, Low MJ, Cone RD. Exocrine gland dysfunction in MC5-R deficient mice: evidence of coordinated regulation of exocrine gland function by melanocortin peptides. Cell. 1997;91:789–798. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80467-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Cheng H, Bjerknes M, Chen H. CRP-ductin: a gene expressed in intestinal crypts and in pancreatic ducts. Anat Rec. 1996;244:327–343. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(199603)244:3<327::AID-AR5>3.0.CO;2-V. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Creagh EM, Conroy H, Seamus MJ. Caspase activation pathways in apoptosis and immunity. Immunol Rev. 2003;193:10–21. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-065x.2003.00048.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cripps MM, Bromberg BB, Patchen-Moor K, Welch MH. Adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation of lacrimal peroxidase secretion. Exp Eye Res. 1987;45:673–682. doi: 10.1016/s0014-4835(87)80116-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.de Hostos EL. The coronin family of actin-associated proteins. Trends Cell Biol. 1999;9:345–350. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8924(99)01620-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dedhar S, Rennie PS, Shago M, Hagesteijn CY, Yang H, Filmus J, Hawley RG, Bruchovsky N, Cheng H, Matusik RJ, Giguere V. Inhibition of nuclear hormone receptor activity by calreticulin. Nature. 1994;367:480–483. doi: 10.1038/367480a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Delbono O. Neural control of aging skeletal muscle. Aging Cell. 2003;2:21–29. doi: 10.1046/j.1474-9728.2003.00011.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Dickinson DP, Thiessse M, Hicks MJ. Expression of type 2 cystatin genes CST1-CST5 in adult human tissues and the developing submandibular gland. DNA Cell Biol. 2002;21:47–65. doi: 10.1089/10445490252810311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Didichenko SA, Segal AW, Thelen M. Evidence for a pool of coronin in mammalian cells that is sensitive to PI 3-kinase. FEBS Lett. 2000;485:147–152. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(00)02220-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Edman JC, Ellis L, Blacher RW, Roth RA, Rutter WJ. Sequence of protein disulphide isomerase and implications of its relationship to thioredoxin. Nature. 1985;317:267–270. doi: 10.1038/317267a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Edwards AV, Titchen DA. The effect of parasympathetic postganglionic denervation on the parotid salivary protein secretion in anesthetized sheep. Auton Neurosci. 2002;100:50–57. doi: 10.1016/s1566-0702(02)00148-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ekstrom J, Reinhold AC. Influence of parasympathetic non-adrenergic, non-cholinergic mechanisms on [3H]thymidine uptake in rat parotid salivary glands in response to mastication following upon a liquid regimen. Arch Oral Biol. 2001;46:1151–1155. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9969(01)00073-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Evans RL, Turner RJ. Upregulation of Na+-K+-2Cl cotransporter activity in rat parotid acinar cells by muscarinic stimulation. J Physiol. 1997;499:351–359. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1997.sp021932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Evans RL, Park K, Turner RJ, Watson GE, Nguyen HV, Dennett MR, Hand AR, Flagella M, Shull GE, Melvin JE. Severe impairment of salivation in Na+/K+/2Cl− cotransporter (NKCC1)-deficient mice. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:26720–26726. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M003753200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Fluck M, Hoppeler H. Molecular basis of skeletal muscle plasticity-from gene to form and function. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol. 2003;146:159–216. doi: 10.1007/s10254-002-0004-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Fox RI, Saito I. Sjogren’s syndrome: immunologic and neuroendocrine mechanisms. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1994;350:609–621. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-2417-5_103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Freedman RB, Klappa P, Ruddock LW. Protein disulfide isomerases exploit synergy between catalytic and specific binding domains. EMBO Rep. 2002;3:136–140. doi: 10.1093/embo-reports/kvf035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Frey BM, Reber BFX, Vishwanath BS, Escher G, Frey FJ. Annexin I modulates cell functions by controlling intracellular calcium release. FASEB J. 1999;13:2235–2245. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.13.15.2235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Fujihara T, Toshida H, Nakata K, Beuerman RW. Tear flow elicited by electrical stimulation of the cornea and “natural” stimulation in rabbit (ARVO Abstract 1394) Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42 Suppl:S258. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Girard LR, Castle AM, Hand AR, Castle JD, Mirels L. Characterization of common salivary protein 1, a product of rat submandibular, sublingual, and parotid glands. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:26592–26601. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Helgren ME, Squinto SP, Davis HL, Parry DJ, Boulton TG, Heck CS, Zhu Y, Yancopoulos GD, Lindsay RM, DiStefano PS. Trophic effect of ciliary neurotrophic factor on denervated skeletal muscle. Cell. 1994;76:493–504. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90113-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hinckle MT, Nairne AC. Phosphorylation of elongation factor 2 during Ca2+-mediated secretion from rat parotid acini. Biochem J. 1992;282:877–882. doi: 10.1042/bj2820877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jahn R, Padel U, Porsch PH, Soling HD. Adrenocorticotropic hormone and α-melanocyte stimulating hormone induce secretion and protein phosphorylation in the rat lacrimal gland by activation of a c-AMP-dependent pathway. Eur J Biochem. 1982;126:623–629. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1982.tb06826.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kiselyov K, Shin DM, Luo X, Ko SBH, Muallem S. Ca2+ signaling in polarized exocrine cells. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2002;506:175–184. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0717-8_23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Krann MVD, Adan RAH, Entwistle ML, Gispen WH, Burbach JPH, Tatro JB. Expression of melanocortin-5 receptor in secretory epithelial supports a functional role in exocrine and endocrine glands. Endocrinology. 1998;139:2348–2355. doi: 10.1210/endo.139.5.6008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Li XJ, Snyder SH. Molecular cloning of Ebnerin, a von Ebner’s gland protein associated with taste buds. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:17674–17679. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.30.17674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Liu N, Fine RE, Simons E, Johnson RJ. Decreasing calreticulin expression lowers the Ca2+ response to bradykinin and increases sensitivity to ionomycin in NG-108–15 cells. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:28635–28639. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Liu Y, Woon PY, Lim SC, Jeyaseelan K, Thiyagarajah P. Cholinergic regulation stimulation of amylase gene expression in the rat parotid gland: inhibition by two distinct post-transcriptional mechanisms. Biochem J. 1995;306:637–642. doi: 10.1042/bj3060637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ma Z, Ramanadham S, Kempe K, Chi XS, Ladenson J, Turk J. Pancreatic islets express a Ca2+-independent phospholipase A2 enzyme that contains a repeated structural motif homologous to the integral membrane protein binding domain of ankyrin. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:11118–11127. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Madsen J, Tornoe I, Nielsen O, Lausen M, Krebs I, Mollenhauer J, Kollender G, Poustka A, Skjodt K, Holmskov U. CRP-ductin, the mouse homologue of gp-340/deleted in malignant brain tumors 1 (DMBT1), binds gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria and interacts with lung surfactant protein D. Eur J Immunol. 2003;33:2327–2336. doi: 10.1002/eji.200323972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Matsui M, Motomura D, Karasawa H, Fujikawa T, Jiang J, Komiya Y, Takahashi S, Taketo MM. Multiple functional defects in peripheral autonomic organs in mice lacking muscarinic acetylcholine receptor gene for the M3 subtype. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:9579–9584. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.17.9579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Meneray MA, Bennett DJ, Nguyen DH, Beuerman RW. Effect of sensory denervation on the structure and physiologic responsiveness of rabbit lacrimal gland. Cornea. 1998;17:99–107. doi: 10.1097/00003226-199801000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Meneray MA, Fields TY, Bromberg BB, Moses RL. Morphology and physiologic responsiveness of cultured rabbit lacrimal acini. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35:4144–4158. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Meunier L, Usherwood YK, Chung KT, Hendershot LM. A subset of chaperones and folding enzymes form multiprotein complexes in endoplasmic reticulum to bind nascent proteins. Mol Biol Cell. 2002;13:4456–4469. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E02-05-0311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Michalak M, Corbett EF, Mesaeli N, Nakamura K, Opas M. Calreticulin: one protein, one gene, many functions. Biochem J. 1999;344:281–292. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Mircheff AK, Gierow JP, Wood RL. Traffic of major histocompatibility complex class II molecules in rabbit lacrimal gland acinar cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35:3943–3951. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Mircheff AK, Warren DW, Wood RL. Hormonal support of lacrimal function, primary lacrimal deficiency, autoimmunity and peripheral tolerance in the lacrimal gland. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 1996;4:1–28. doi: 10.3109/09273949609079648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Moser M, Bosserhoff AK, Hunziker EB, Sandell L, Fassler R, Buettner R. Ultrastructural cartilage abnormalities in MIA/CD-RAP-deficient mice. Mol Cell Biol. 2002;22:1438–1445. doi: 10.1128/mcb.22.5.1438-1445.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Nakayama K. Furin: a mammalian subtilisin/Kex2p–like endoprotease involved in processing of a wide variety of precursor proteins. Biochem J. 1997;327:625–635. doi: 10.1042/bj3270625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Nguyen DH, Beuerman RW, Toshida H. The effects of sensory and parasympathetic denervation on the kinases and initiation factors controlling protein synthesis in the lacrimal gland. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2002;506:65–70. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0717-8_8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Nguyen D, Toshida H, Beuerman RW. Microarray analysis of the effects of parasympathetic denervation on the rat lacrimal gland (abstract 4009) Assoc Res Vis Ophthalmol. 2002 May; http://www.arvo.org/root/index.asp) [Google Scholar]
- 51.Pause A, Belsham GJ, Gingras AC, Donze O, Lin TA, Lawrence JC, Sonnenberg N. Insulin-dependent stimulation of protein synthesis by phosphorylation of a regulator of 5′-cap function. Nature. 1994;371:762–767. doi: 10.1038/371762a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Raynal P, Pollard HB. Annexins: the problem of assessing the biological role for a gene family of multifunctional calcium- and phospholipid-binding proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1994;1197:63–93. doi: 10.1016/0304-4157(94)90019-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Redl B. Human tear lipocalin. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000;1482:241–248. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4838(00)00142-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Richards SM, Liu M, Sullivan BD, Sullivan DA. Gender-related differences in gene expression of the lacrimal gland. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2002;506:121–127. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0717-8_16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Rossi J, Luukko K, Poteryaev D, Laurikainen A, Sun YF, Laakso T, Eerikainen S, Tuominen R, Lakso M, Rauvala H, Arumae U, Saarma M, Airaksinne MS. Retarded growth and deficits in the enteric and parasympathetic nervous system in mice lacking GFRa2, a functional neurturin receptor. Neuron. 1999;22:243–252. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)81086-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Sathe S, Sakata M, Beaton AR, Sack RA. Identification, origins and the diurnal role of the principal serine protease inhibitors in human tear fluid. Curr Eye Res. 1998;17:348–362. doi: 10.1080/02713689808951215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Schimmelpfennig B, Beuerman RW. A technique for controlled sensory denervation of the rabbit cornea. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1982;218:287–293. doi: 10.1007/BF02150440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Schulz BL, Oxley D, Packer NH, Karlsson NG. Identification of two highly sialylated human tear-fluid DMBT1 isoforms: the major high-molecular-mass glycoproteins in human tears. Biochem J. 2002;366:511–520. doi: 10.1042/BJ20011876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Scott BL, Pease DC. Electron microscopy of the salivary and lacrimal glands of the rat. Am J Anat. 1959;104:115–162. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001040106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Shaw PA, Yu WH. Sympathetic and parasympathetic regulation of cystatin S gene expression. Life Sci. 2001;70:301–313. doi: 10.1016/s0024-3205(01)01379-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Sivakumar S, Mirels L, Miranda AJ, Hand AR. Secretory protein expression patterns during rat parotid gland development. Anat Rec. 1998;252:485–497. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(199811)252:3<485::AID-AR17>3.0.CO;2-J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Sprong H, Degroote S, Nilsson T, Kawakita M, Ishida N, van der Sluijs P, van Meer G. Association of the Golgi UDP-galactose transporter with UDP galactose:ceramide galactosyltransferase allows UDP-galactose import in the endoplasmic reticulum. Mol Biol Cell. 2003;14:3482–3493. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E03-03-0130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Stahlman MT, Gray ME, Hull WM, Whitsett JA. Immunolocalization of surfactant protein-d (sp-d) in human fetal, newborn, and adult tissues. J Histochem Cytochem. 2002;50:651–660. doi: 10.1177/002215540205000506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Stern ME, Beuerman RW, Fox RI, Gao J, Mircheff AK, Pflugfelder SC. A unified theory of the role of the ocular surface in dry eye. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1988;438:643–651. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-5359-5_91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Stern ME, Beuerman RW, Fox RI, Gao J, Mircheff AK, Pflugfelder SC. The pathology of dry eye: the interaction between the ocular surface and lacrimal glands. Cornea. 1998;17:584–589. doi: 10.1097/00003226-199811000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Takito J, Yan L, Ma J, Hikita C, Vijayakumar S, Warburton D, Al-Awqati Q. Hensin: the polarity reversal protein is encoded by DMBT1, a gene frequently deleted in malignant gliomas. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2. 1999;77:F277–F289. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.1999.277.2.F277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Talamano BR, Chona AS, Burt DR. Parasympathetic denervation decreases muscarinic receptor binding in rat parotid. Life Sci. 1979;24:1573–1580. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(79)90018-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Tao Y, Zeng H, Zhang J, Okamoto CT, Warren DW, Wood RL, Bachmann M, Mircheff AK. MHC class II molecules, cathepsins, and La/SSB proteins in lacrimal acinar cell endomembranes. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 1999;277:C994–C1007. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1999.277.5.C994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Tenneti L, Gibbons SJ, Talamo BR. Expression and trans-synaptic regulation of P2×4 and P2z receptors for extracellular ATP in parotid acinar cells. Effects of parasympathetic denervation. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:26799–26808. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.41.26799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Toma L, Pinhal MAS, Dietrich CP, Nader HB, Hirschberg CB. Transport of UDP-galactose into the Golgi lumen regulates the biosynthesis of proteoglycans. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:3897–3901. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.7.3897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Toshida H, Beuerman RW. Effects of preganglionic parasympathetic denervation on the rabbit lacrimation. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2002;506:225–229. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0717-8_30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Uchida K, Chaudhary LR, Sugimura Y, Adkisson HD, Hruska KA. Proprotein convertases regulate activity of prostrate epithelial cell differentiation markers and are modulated in human prostrate cancer cells. J Cell Biochem. 2003;88:394–399. doi: 10.1002/jcb.10327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Walcott B, Moore L, Birzgalis A, Claros N, Brink PR. A model of fluid secretion by the acinar cells of the mouse lacrimal gland. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2002;506:191–197. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0717-8_25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Wood RL, Zhang J, Huang ZM, Gierow JP, Schechter JE, Mircheff AK, Warren DW. Prolactin and prolactin receptors in the lacrimal gland. Exp Eye Res. 1999;69:213–226. doi: 10.1006/exer.1999.0690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Yoshino K, Monroy D, Pflugfelder SC. Cholinergic stimulation of lactoferrin and epidermal growth factor secretion by the human lacrimal gland. Cornea. 1996;15:617–621. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Zoukhri D, Dartt DA. Cholinergic activation of phospholipase D in lacrimal gland acini is independent of protein kinase C and calcium. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 1995;268:C713–C720. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1995.268.3.C713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



