Abstract

Seven different types of benzannulated N-heterocycles—indolines, dihydropyrrolopyridines, benzimidazolines, dihydrobenzo-3,1-oxazines, benzomorpholines, tetrahydroquinolines, and tetrahydroisoquinolines—can be obtained from simple dinucleophiles and electron-deficient acetylenes in one synthetic step. This powerful methodology was made possible through the use of diphenylphosphinopropane (DPPP) as the catalyst, with acetic acid and sodium acetate used as additives in some cases. The benzannulated N-heterocycles were isolated in excellent yields under mild metal-free conditions; they were purified without the need for aqueous work-ups.
Functionalized saturated benzannulated N-heterocycles (e.g., indoline, dihydropyrrolopyridine, benzimidazoline, tetrahydroquinoline, tetrahydroisoquinoline, dihydrobenzo-1,4-oxazine, dihydrobenzo-3,1-oxazine) have been of interest to chemists for over a century because of their seemingly ubiquitous presence in natural products1 and pharmaceutical drugs.2 Not surprisingly, several useful strategies are available for the synthesis of these heterocycles, with the majority of them typically generating one or two of the compounds mentioned above.3 Based on our recent finding of a diphosphine-catalyzed mixed double-Michael reaction that proceeds through a [4 + 1] annulation, in this paper we report a unified protocol for the synthesis of the title heterocycles under robust metal-free reaction conditions (Scheme 1).4 Our approach is highly modular and particularly well suited for the preparation of substituted saturated benzannulated N-heterocycles. The requisite dinucleophiles are readily assembled from commercially available starting materials.5 Given the common occurrence of the title heterocycles in a large number of bioactive molecules, this methodology should provide new avenues toward the preparation of compounds relevant to the development of human medicines.
Scheme 1.
Formation of Benzannulated Heterocycles
As a test case for the construction of aniline-containing benzannulated heterocycles, we subjected the nucleophile 1a and acetylacetylene (2a) to our previously reported mixed double-Michael reaction conditions: i.e., 20 mol % diphenylphosphinopropane (DPPP) in CH3CN (Table 1, entry 1). The desired indoline 3a was obtained in 79% yield.6 Although this yield is acceptable synthetically, the reaction efficiency was markedly poorer than that for pyrrolidine formation from a corresponding aliphatic amine-derived nucleophile (91% vs. 79%). To improve the reaction efficiency, we tested Brønsted acid additives that are known to be compatible with nucleophilic phosphine catalysis.7 To our delight, addition of 50 mol % AcOH provided a reaction efficiency comparable with that of aliphatic amine-derived nucleophiles (entry 5; 92% yield).8 The combination of a Brønsted acid and its conjugate base performed even better; we obtained indoline 3a in 99% yield in the presence of AcOH and NaOAc (50 mol % each).9 Indeed, for several common Brønsted acid additives, pairs of acids and bases, rather than the acids or bases alone, consistently provided higher product yields (entries 5–11).10 Although there was no clear correlation between the pKa of the Brønsted acid and the reaction efficiency, additives of low pKa completely shut down the reaction, presumably through quenching of the reactive zwitterionic intermediates (entries 2–4).11 Notably, one inorganic acid/base pair (NaHCO3/CO32−) improved the reaction yield by 8%, whereas another (H2O/NaOH) did not (entries 8 and 11).12 The added acid/base pair presumably facilitated the proton transfer steps involved in the double-Michael process.
Table 1.
Evaluation of Conditions for the Formation of Indoline 3aa
![]() | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| yield (%)c |
|||||
| entry | acid | pKab | conjugate base | with acid | with acid/base |
| 1 | none | none | 79 | N/D | |
| 2 | CF3CO2H | −0.25d | CF3CO2Na | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | H3PO4 | 2.1d | N/A | 0 | N/D |
| 4 | 2,4-dinitrophenol | 5.1 | N/A | 0 | N/D |
| 5 | CH3CO2H | 12.6 | CH3CO2Na | 92 | 99 |
| 6 | bi(2-naphthol) | 16.2 | +n-BuLi | 81 | 94 |
| 7 | thiourea | 21.0 | +n-BuLi | 57 | 68 |
| 8 | NaHCO3 | 10.2d | Na2CO3 | 80 | 87 |
| 9 | CF3CH2OH | 23.5 | CF3CH2ONa | 91 | 93 |
| 10 | urea | 26.9 | +n-BuLi | 82 | 85 |
| 11 | H2O | 31.4 | NaOH | 67 | 75 |
All reactions were performed using 1.0 mmol of 1a, 1.1 mmol of acetylacetylene (2a), 20 mol % of DPPP, and 0.50 mmol of the additive(s).
pKa in DMSO.
Isolated yield.
pKa in H2O.
The combination of DPPP catalyst and AcOH/NaOAc additives provided a variety of aniline-containing heterocycles efficiently (Table 2).13 With the phenylmalonate nucleophile 1a, both benzoylacetylene and methyl propiolate were suitable Michael acceptors (entries 1 and 2). A variety of substituents on the benzene ring (cf. entries 6 and 12) as well as heteroaromatic rings were compatible with the reaction. For instance, the pyridylmalonate 1d provided the dihydropyrrolopyridines 3d and 3e in excellent yields at elevated temperature (entries 3 and 4). The 1,2-benzenediamine-derived nucleophile 1f also underwent the double-Michael reaction to provide the benzimidazoline 3f (entry 5). This result is in stark contrast with Lu’s report of the tandem umpolung addition/Michael reactions of 1,2-di(p-toluenesulfonamido) ethane onto acetylenes.14 Benzimidazolines are not only important biologically—they are used as sources of organic hydrides and hydrogen storage materials.15
Table 2.
Syntheses of Benzannulated N-Heterocyclesa
![]() | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| entry | nucleophile | product | yield (%)b |
| 1 | 1a |
![]() 3b |
92 |
| 2 | 1a |
![]() 3c |
87 |
| 3c |
![]() 1d |
![]() 3d |
94 |
| 4c | 1d |
![]() 3e |
96 |
| 5c |
![]() 1f |
![]() 3f |
81 |
| 6c |
![]() 1g |
![]() 3g |
88 |
| 7d |
![]() 1h |
![]() 3h |
81 |
| 8d | 1h |
![]() 3i |
80 |
| 9d |
![]() 1j |
![]() 3j |
91 |
| 10d | 1j |
![]() 3k |
92 |
| 11e |
![]() 1l |
![]() 3l |
83 |
| 12e |
![]() 1m |
![]() 3m |
82 |
Performed using 1.0 mmol of the nucleophile, 1.1 mmol of the acetylene, 20 mol % of DPPP, and 0.50 mmol of AcOH and NaOAc in CH3CN at rt, unless otherwise noted.
Isolated yields after chromatographic purification.
Reactions were performed under reflux.
Reactions were run in the absence of AcOH/NaOAc in CH3CN under reflux.
In the absence of AcOH/NaOAc in CH3CN at rt.
Next, we extended this chemistry to 1,5- dinucleophiles for the synthesis of six-membered ring-fused benzannulated heterocycles via [5 + 1] annulation. The benzyl alcohol 1g reacted well under the optimized reaction conditions, providing the dihydrobenzo-3,1-oxazine 3g in 88% isolated yield (entry 6). A notable extension of this methodology is represented by the annulations of the related nitrogen–carbon dinucleophile 1h to give the benzomorpholines 3h and 3i (entries 7 and 8), which slowly decomposed in the presence of AcOH and NaOAc in refluxing CH3CN; we found, however, that catalytic DPPP alone provided slightly better product yields.16 Dihydrobenzo-1,4- and -3,1-oxazines have long been recognized for their wide range of medicinal activities (e.g., antibacterial, neuroprotectant, cardiovascular, antitumor).17
We further extended this [5 + 1] annulation to the synthesis of tetrahydroquinolines and tetrahydroisoquinolines (Table 2, entries 9–12). The benzylmalonate 1j, when mixed with electron-deficient acetylenes and catalytic DPPP, generated the tetrahydroquinolines 3j and 3k in excellent yields (entries 9 and 10). The tetrahydroisoquinolines 3l and 3m were formed from the corresponding benzylamine-derived pronucleophiles 1l and 1m (entries 11 and 12). Tetrahydroquinolines and -isoquinolines are present in many natural products and exhibit a wide range of pharmacological activities.18
To summarize, seven different types of bicyclic heterocycles—indoline, dihydropyrrolopyridine, benzimidazoline, dihydrobenzo-3,1-oxazine, dihydrobenzo-1,4-oxazine, tetrahydroquinoline, and tetrahydroisoquinoline—can be synthesized in one step, in excellent yields, from simple dinucleophiles and electron-deficient acetylenes. The Michael reaction is one of the most important fundamental organic reactions; our study highlights the power of the Michael reaction when applied to the right combination of starting materials under suitable reaction conditions. This versatile catalysis was mediated by DPPP with, in some cases, AcOH/NaOAc additives. This DPPP-catalyzed mixed double-Michael reaction should be further expandable to the assembly of other heterocycles—one goal for our future endeavors.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Financial support was provided by the NIH (R01GM071779 and P41GM081282). We thank Dr. Saeed Khan (Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, UCLA) for performing the crystallographic analyses.
Footnotes
Supporting Information Available Representative experimental procedures and spectral data for all new compounds (PDF). Crystallographic data for 3a, 3f, 3g, 3h, 3j, and 3m (CIF). This information is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
References
- 1.Bonjoch J, Sole D. Chem Rev. 2000;100:3455. doi: 10.1021/cr9902547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.The Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) database provided the following numbers of references for each heterocycle: indoline, 3374 patents, 102 reviews; benzimidazoline, 1085 patents, 19 reviews; tetrahydroquinoline, 2020 patents, 38 reviews; tetrahydroisoquinoline, 2165 patents, 361 reviews; dihydrobenzoxazines, 928 patents, 25 reviews.
- 3.For reviews on their synthesis, see: Katritzky AR, Rachwal S, Rachwal B. Tetrahedron. 1996;52:15031.Achari B, Mandal SB, Dutta PK, Chowdhury C. Synlett. 2004:2449.Ilas J, Anderluh PS, Dolenc MS, Kikelj D. Tetrahedron. 2005;61:7325.Chrzanowska M, Rozwadowska MD. Chem Rev. 2004;104:3341. doi: 10.1021/cr030692k.For selected examples, see: Mei TS, Wang X, Yu JQ. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:10806. doi: 10.1021/ja904709b.Liu XY, Che CM. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2009;48:2367. doi: 10.1002/anie.200805383.
- 4.Sriramurthy V, Barcan GA, Kwon O. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:12928. doi: 10.1021/ja073754n. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.See the Supporting Information for the preparation of the starting materials.
- 6.With 20 mol% of the monodentate tertiary phosphines PPh3 and PEtPh2, we obtained 3a in 18 and 23% yields, respectively.
- 7.For selected examples, see: Takashina N, Price CC. J Am Chem Soc. 1962;84:489.Oda R, Kawabata T, Tanimoto S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1964;5:1653.McClure JD. J Org Chem. 1970;35:3045.Rychnovsky SD, Kim J. J Org Chem. 1994;59:2659.Thalji RK, Roush WR. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:16778. doi: 10.1021/ja054085l.Xia Y, Liang Y, Chen Y, Wang M, Jiao L, Huang F, Liu S, Li Y, Yu ZX. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:3470. doi: 10.1021/ja068215h.Mercier E, Fonovic B, Henry C, Kwon O, Dudding T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007;48:3613.
- 8.Trost BM, Kazmaier U. J Am Chem Soc. 1992;114:7933. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Trost BM, Dake GR. J Am Chem Soc. 1997;119:7595. [Google Scholar]
- 10.See the Supporting Information for a list of all of the additives tested.
- 11.Virieux D, Guillouzic AF, Cristau HJ. Tetrahedron. 2006;62:3710. [Google Scholar]
- 12.For Brønsted acid/phosphine bifunctional catalysis, see: Shi M, Chen LH, Li CQ. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:3790. doi: 10.1021/ja0447255.Cowen BJ, Miller SJ. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:10988. doi: 10.1021/ja0734243.Fang YQ, Jacobsen E. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:5660. doi: 10.1021/ja801344w.Meng X, Huang Y, Chen R. Org Lett. 2009;11:3498. doi: 10.1021/ol802453c. and references therein.
- 13.The structures of 3a, 3f, 3g, 3h, 3j, and 3m were confirmed through X-ray crystallographic analysis. See the Supporting Information for details.
- 14.Lu C, Lu X. Org Lett. 2002;4:4677. doi: 10.1021/ol0270733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.(a) Smith JG, Ho I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1971;38:3541. [Google Scholar]; (b) Prakash GKS, Mathew T, Panja C, Vaghoo H, Venkataraman K, Olah GA. Org Lett. 2007;9:179. doi: 10.1021/ol062562e. and references therein. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.See the Supporting Information for details.
- 17.(a) Gromachevskaya EV, Kvitkovskii FV, Kosulina TP, Kul’nevich VG. Chem Heterocycl Comp. 2003;39:137. [Google Scholar]; (b) Liu Z, Chen Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009;50:3790. and references therein. [Google Scholar]
- 18.(a) Balasubramanian M, Keay JG. In: Comprehensive Heterocyclic Chemistry II. McKillop A, editor. Vol. 5. Pergamon Press; Oxford: 1996. pp. 245–300. Chapter 5. [Google Scholar]; (b) Scott JD, Williams RM. Chem Rev. 2002;102:1669. doi: 10.1021/cr010212u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.






















