Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 6;115(10):2077–2087. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-03-211375

Table 3.

Patient characteristics for 12 AML patients for RT-PCR

Sample Age/sex Primary/secondary De novo/relapsed Cytogenetics Flt-3 ITD % CD34 FAB Notes
1 53/F Primary Relapsed 46, XX, t(5;15;12;12) Unknown 50 M5
2 56/M Secondary De novo 45, XY, t(8;9)(q24;q22),-21 Negative 52 NS Secondary to chronic eosinophilic leukemia
3 47/M Primary De novo Normal Negative 68 M5
4 40/F Primary De novo Normal Normal 90 M5
5 77/F Primary De novo 46, XX, der(7)t(1;7)(q25;q31.2) Negative 87 M4 FLT3 TKD positive
6 59/M Primary De novo Normal Positive 18 NS
7 64/M Primary De novo Normal Positive 3 M1
8 39/M Primary Relapsed Normal Positive 27 M4 NPM positive
9 61/F Primary De novo 46, XX, t(10;11)(p11.2–12;q23) Negative 8 M5 MLL positive
10 39/F Primary De novo Normal Positive 1 M4 NPM positive
11 57/F Primary De novo Normal Negative 4 M5 NPM positive
12 46/M Primary De novo Failed to grow Negative 98 M5 FISH negative for monosomy 5,7 and trisomy 8

Twelve patients were screened by RT-PCR for NuSAP1 and CHAF1b gene expression analysis. The patient characteristics are described.

RT-PCR indicates reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction; TKD, tyrosine kinase domain; NPM, nucleophosmin; FAB, French-American-British; MLL, mixed lineage leukemia; and FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization.