Skip to main content
Cognitive Neurodynamics logoLink to Cognitive Neurodynamics
. 2010 Jan 20;4(1):81–90. doi: 10.1007/s11571-009-9102-4

Global robust power-rate stability of delayed genetic regulatory networks with noise perturbations

Yanyan Wang 1,2, Jinde Cao 2,, Lulu Li 2
PMCID: PMC2837527  PMID: 21359037

Abstract

In this paper, by using the Lyapunov method, Itô’s differential formula and linear matrix inequality (LMI) approach, the global robust power-rate stability in mean square is discussed for genetic regulatory networks with unbounded time-varying delay, noise perturbations and parameter uncertainties. Sufficient conditions are given to ensure the robust power-rate stability (in mean square) of the genetic regulatory networks. Meanwhile, the criteria ensuring global power-rate stability in mean square are a byproduct of the criteria guaranteeing global robust power-rate stability in mean square. The obtained conditions are derived in terms of linear matrix inequalities (LMIs) which are easy to be verified via the LMI toolbox. An illustrative example is given to show the effectiveness of the obtained result.

Keywords: Global robust power-rate stability in mean square, Global power-rate stability in mean square, Genetic regulatory networks, Stochastic perturbation, Unbounded time-varying delay, Linear matrix inequality (LMI)

Introduction

Nowadays, With the fast development of cognitive science, it is current to study cognitive science with the viewpoint of neurodynamics. In Wang and Zhang (2006), the authors showed that principle of the energy coding can reveal mechanism of brain information processing in physical nature, which make it is possible to indicate a new road from the point of view of globe of brain information processing for comprehending role of information coding of neural-network system of brain. And the analytic results in Wang et al. (2009b) is beneficial to the study of the important scientific problem as how the brain performs coding at the level of locla neural networks. And some conclusions about robust stability, and so on have been obtained for cognitive neurodynamics, we refer to Wang et al. (2009a), Liu et al. (2009) and the references cited therein. Meanwhile, with the development of genome sequencing and gene recognition, the study for the dynamics of gene networks has some contributions to the development of cognitive neurodynamics. Genetic regulatory networks have become an important new area of research in the biological and biomedical sciences and attracted great attention over past few years (Gardner et al. 2000; Elowitz and Leibler 2000; Austin et al. 2006; McAdams and Shapiro 1995; Becskei and Serrano 2000; Monk 2003; Xu and Tao 2006). Nowadays, one of the main challenges in systems biology is to understand the genetic regulatory networks, such as, how genes and proteins interact to form a complex network that performs complicated biological functions. Because genetic networks are biochemically dynamical systems, mathematical modelling of genetic networks as dynamical system models can be viewed as a powerful tool for studying gene regulation processes in living organisms. Mathematical models of genetic networks in literature can be roughly classified into two types, i.e., the Boolean model and the differential equation model (De Jong 2002; Smolen et al. 2000; Bolouri and Davidson 2002).

Gene regulation is an intrinsically noisy process, which is subject to intracellular and extracellular noise perturbations and environment fluctuations (Elowitz 2002; Paulsson 2004; Paulsson and Ehrenberg 2001; Raser and OShea 2005; Chen et al. 2005; Li et al. 2006a, b, 2007; Wang et al. 2007). Such noises will undoubtedly affect the dynamics of the gene networks. In Li et al. (2006b), based on Lyapunov method and the Lur’s system approach, the asymptotical stability in mean square is studied for genetic networks with SUM regulatory logic. In Li et al. (2007), the authors studied the stability of the delayed genetic networks with non-vanishing perturbation term.

Besides, time delays are also unavoidable in genetic regulatory networks particularly owing to the slow processes of transcription, translation, and translocation (Wang et al. 2009a; Monk 2003; Smolen et al. 2002; Bratsun et al. 2005; Chen and Aihara 2002; He and Cao 2008; Yu et al. 2009). Such time delays may make the dynamics in the genetic networks be more complicated. About the study of delayed genetic regulatory networks, we refer to Monk (2003), Li et al. (2006b), (2007), Wang et al. (2007), Smolen et al. (2002), Bratsun et al. (2005), Chen and Aihara (2002), Ren and Cao (2008), Cao and Ren (2008) and the references cited therein. Also, there are often some unavoidable uncertainties in modelling networks due to modelling errors and parameter fluctuations. The uncertainties can cause the network to be unstable and perform poorly. Hence, the study of the robust stability for genetic regulatory networks with parameter uncertainties has attracted some author’s interest (Wang et al. 2007; Ren and Cao 2008). In Wang et al. (2007), a robust variance-constrained filtering problem is investigated for a gene expression model with stochastic disturbances and norm-bounded parameter uncertainties, where the stochastic perturbation is in the form of a scalar Gaussian white noise with constant variance and the parameter uncertainties enter both the system matrix and the output matrix. In Ren and Cao (2008), based on the Lyapunov stability theory and linear matrix inequality (LMI), the authors analyzed the robust asymptotical stability issues of the genetic regulatory networks with time-varying delays and norm bounded uncertainties.

However, it should be noted that most authors took account of bounded delays or assumed that time-varying delays are differentiable and their derivatives are with a upper boundedness which is less than 1 when they studied the dynamic behaviors of networks (Monk 2003; Li et al. 2006b, 2007; Wang et al. 2007; Smolen et al. 2002; Bratsun et al. 2005; Chen and Aihara 2002; Ren and Cao 2008; Cao and Ren 2008). But, if the delays are unbounded, what will happen? It’s an interesting issue. To the best of our knowledge, neural networks with unbounded time-varying delays are seldom considered (Zeng et al. 2005; Chen and Wang 2007). In Zeng et al. (2005), the global asymptotic stability and the global exponential stability are discussed for neural networks with unbounded time-varying delays and with bounded and Lipschitz continuous activation functions. In Chen and Wang (2007), the authors considered global power-rate stability which is firstly proposed for dynamical systems with unbounded time-varying delays.

In the applications and designs of networks, the faster the convergence rate of the networks is, the higher the cost is. It is well-known that the asymptotic convergence rate is slower than that of exponential convergence. But, in order to reduce the cost and keep fast convergence rate, the power-rate stability, the convergence rate of which is between asymptotic convergence rate and exponential convergence rate, can be considered.

This paper aims to investigate the global robust power-rate stability (in mean square) for genetic regulatory networks with unbounded time-varying delay, noise perturbations and parameter uncertainties by using the Lyapunov method, Itô’s differential formula and linear matrix inequality (LMI) technique which is used more frequently for its easily being verified. Novel criterion is derived to guarantee the global robust power stability (in mean square) of the considered model. Here, the time-varying delay is assumed to be unbounded and less than or equal to μt with 0 < μ < 1. In addition, as a byproduct, the global power stability in mean square is also considered for given model.

The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Sect. 2, model description and preliminaries are presented. The main results are stated in Sect. 3. In Sect. 4, an example is given to show the validity of the obtained result. Finally, in Sect. 5, the conclusions are drawn.

Notations Throughout the paper, AT denotes the transpose of square matrix A. For real symmetric matrices X and Y, the notation X > Y (respectively, X ≥ Y) means that the matrix X − Y is positive definite (respectively, positive semi-definite). I denotes the identity matrix with compatible dimensions. Inline graphic are used as the maximum eigenvalue and the minimum eigenvalue of matrix A, respectively. The notation “*” is used as an ellipsis for terms that are induced by symmetry.

Model description and preliminaries

Genetic regulatory networks without noise perturbations are expressed in the following (Ren and Cao 2008):

graphic file with name M2.gif

where Mi(t) and Pi(t) are the concentrations of messenger RNA and protein of the ith node, respectively; ai and ci are the decay rates of messenger RNA and protein, respectively; di is the translation rate; Inline graphic(t), τ(t) are time-varying delays. The function Gij denotes the feedback regulation of the jth protein on the transcription, which is a monotonic function of the Hill form (Li et al. 2006c): if transcription factor j is an activator of gene i, then

graphic file with name M4.gif

if transcription factor j is a repressor of gene i, then

graphic file with name M5.gif

where Hj is the Hill coefficient, βj is positive constant, bij is a bounded constant, which is the dimensionless transcriptional rate of transcription factor j to i.

Hence, model (1) can be rewritten as follows:

graphic file with name M6.gif

where Inline graphic and Ii is the set of all the j which is a repressor of gene i, W = (wij)n × n and wij is defined as follows:

graphic file with name M8.gif

The compact form of model (2) is expressed as follows:

graphic file with name M9.gif

where M(t) = (M1(t), …, Mn(t))T, P(t) = (P1(t), …, Pn(t))T, f(P(t − Inline graphic(t))) = (f1(P1(t − Inline graphic(t))), …, fn(Pn(t − Inline graphic(t))))T, A = diag(a1a2, …, an), C = diag(c1c2, …, cn), D = diag(d1d2, …, dn), B = (B1, …, Bn)T.

From the definition of fj, one can obtain that fj is a monotonically increasing function with saturation, and it satisfies

graphic file with name M13.gif

for all Inline graphic with Inline graphic Let (M*TP*T)T be an equilibrium point of model (3), using the following transformation, we shift it to the origin:

graphic file with name M16.gif

and the model (3) can be rewritten as follows:

graphic file with name M17.gif

where Inline graphic with gi(pi(t)) = fi(Pi(t)) − fi(P*i).

From (4), one can have that the function gi satisfies the sector condition:

graphic file with name M19.gif

for all Inline graphic with Inline graphic

In practice, parameter uncertainties exist during electronic implementation of neural networks, and can lead to deviations and perturbations. So, in this paper, we consider above genetic regulatory networks with unbounded time-varying delays, noise perturbations and parameter uncertainties, the model is expressed as follows:

graphic file with name M22.gif

where Inline graphic is called the noise intensity matrix, ω(t) is an n-dimensional Wiener process (Arnold 1974) with E{dω(t)} = 0, E{[dω(t)]2} = dt; τ(t) is unbounded time-varying delay and satisfies 0 ≤ τ(t) ≤ μt with Inline graphic.

The initial conditions are given by

graphic file with name M25.gif

where Inline graphic are bounded and continuous on (− ∞, 0].

The parametric uncertainties Inline graphic are time-varying matrices which have the following form:

graphic file with name M28.gif

where HH*E1E2E*1E*2 are known real constant matrices with appropriate dimensions, and F(t), F*(t) are unknown real time-varying matrices satisfying

graphic file with name M29.gif

As in many stochastic system studies (Li et al. 2006b, 2007), we make the following assumption: (A1):

graphic file with name M30.gif

where L1 ≥ 0, L2 ≥ 0.

Definition 1 The genetic regulatory network model (7) with Inline graphic is said to be globally power-rate stable in mean square, if there exist scalars α > 0 and γ > 0 such that

graphic file with name M32.gif

Here, γ is power convergence rate.

Definition 2 The genetic regulatory network model (7) is said to be globally robust power-rate stable in mean square, if the equilibrium point of the model is globally power-rate stable in mean square in the presence of the parameters uncertainties satisfying (8) and (9).

Lemma 1 Liao et al. (2002) Given any real matricesInline graphicof appropriate dimensions and a scalar λ > 0 such thatInline graphic. Then, the following inequality holds:

graphic file with name M35.gif

Lemma 2 Zou and Wang (2007) Given matricesQ = QT, H, Eof appropriate dimensions, the matrix inequality

graphic file with name M36.gif

holes for allFsatisfyingFTF ≤ Iif and only if there exists a scalar ɛ > 0 such that

graphic file with name M37.gif

Lemma 3 (Schur Complement) Boyd et al. (1994) The linear matrix inequality (LMI)

graphic file with name M38.gif

is equivalent to the following condition:

graphic file with name M39.gif

whereST11 = S11, ST22 = S22.

Main results

In this section, we analyze the global robust power-rate stability in mean square of model (7) by using appropriate Lyapunov functional.

Theorem 1 If there exist two symmetric positive definite matricesQ1, Q2and five positive scalar ρ > 0, ɛ1 > 0, ɛ2 > 0, ɛ*1 > 0, ɛ*2 > 0 such that

graphic file with name M40.gif
graphic file with name M41.gif

and

graphic file with name M42.gif

where k = max{k1k2, ..., kn}, then, the model (7) is globally robust power-rate stable in mean square.

Proof If the LMI (10) and (11) hold, we can find two sufficient small constants β > 0 and γ > 0, such that

graphic file with name M43.gif
graphic file with name M44.gif

Furthermore, there exists a sufficiently large T, such that for all t > T,

graphic file with name M45.gif

In the following, we always assume t > T.

Consider the following Lyapunov function:

graphic file with name M46.gif

Denote Inline graphic, then, α(t) is nondecreasing and E(V(tm(t), p(t))) ≤ α(t).

In the following, we will prove that for all t ≥ T, α(t) = α(T).

For any t0 > T, if E(V(t0m(t0), p(t0))) < α(t0), then α(t) is non-increasing at t0. Now, we consider the case that E(V(t0m(t0), p(t0))) = α(t0). By Itô’s formula (Li et al. 2006b), we obtain the following stochastic differential:

graphic file with name M48.gif

where Inline graphic is the diffusion operation, and

graphic file with name M50.gif

From Lemma 1, one can obtain

graphic file with name M51.gif

and

graphic file with name M52.gif

By Assumption (A1), we have

graphic file with name M53.gif

From (17), (18), (19) and (20), we obtain

graphic file with name M54.gif

From (6), the following inequality holds:

graphic file with name M55.gif

Also, we have

graphic file with name M56.gif

So, we obtain

graphic file with name M57.gif

Hence, one can obtain

graphic file with name M58.gif

Because E(V(t0 − τ(t0), m(t0 − τ(t0)), p(t0 − τ(t0)))) ≤ α(t0) = E(V(t0m(t0), p(t0))), we have

graphic file with name M59.gif

From (8) and (9), we obtain

graphic file with name M60.gif
graphic file with name M61.gif

By Lemma 2, Lemma 3 and LMI (12) and (13), we have

graphic file with name M62.gif

and

graphic file with name M63.gif

Also, by Lemma 3, the inequalities (29) and (30) are equivalent to the following inequalities:

graphic file with name M64.gif
graphic file with name M65.gif

Therefore, Inline graphic and α(t) is also non-increasing at t0 in the case that E(V(t0m(t0), p(t0))) = α(t0).

In summary, for all t ≥ T, α(t) = α(T). From the definition of α(t), we obtain that E(V(tm(t), p(t))) ≤ α(t) ≤ α(T) for all t. Meanwhile, we have

graphic file with name M67.gif

Hence, one can obtain

graphic file with name M68.gif

that is, the model (7) is globally robust power-rate stable in mean square with the parameters uncertainties satisfying (8) and (9), and power-rate convergence rate is γ. The proof of Theorem 1 is completed.

Remark 1 From the proof of Theorem 1, the power-rate convergence rate γ can be estimated. From (12) and (13), we have

graphic file with name M69.gif
graphic file with name M70.gif

Hence, we have that

graphic file with name M71.gif

Remark 2 For simplicity, in model (7), we consider the delays are both τ(t). Also, when considering Inline graphic, we can take consider of μ such that 0 ≤ τ(t), Inline graphic(t) ≤ μ t. Under this condition, similar result can be obtained for model (5) with noise perturbations.

In addition, from the proof of Theorem 1, if the parameter uncertainties vanish, global power-rate stability in mean square can be derived. It can be seen in the following corollary.

Corollary 1 If there exist two symmetric positive definite matricesQ1, Q2and a positive scalar ρ > 0 such that

graphic file with name M74.gif
graphic file with name M75.gif

and

graphic file with name M76.gif

whereInline graphicthen, the model (7) withInline graphicis globally power-rate stable in mean square.

Illustrative example

In this section, we present an example to show the effectiveness of our theoretical results.

We consider the genetic network in Li et al. (2006b), [Fig. 2] with unbounded time-varying delay and stochastic perturbation. Let

graphic file with name M79.gif

and Inline graphic i.e., the Hill coefficient is 2. It is obvious that k = 0.65.

Assuming that the delay Inline graphic we have Inline graphic The noise intensity is assumed as follows:

graphic file with name M83.gif

with Inline graphic

We can easily obtain that

graphic file with name M85.gif

and L2 = 0.

By using the MATLAB LMI Toolbox, the LMIs (10) and (11) hold with ρ = 0.0395, ɛ1 = 0.0152, ɛ*1 = 0.0031, ɛ2 = 5.5035, ɛ*2 = 0.0164,

graphic file with name M86.gif

Hence, the considered model with the parameter uncertainties is globally robust power-rate stable in mean square.

When the parameter uncertainties vanish, the unique equilibrium point of this network without stochastic perturbation is M* = (0.3955, 0.5208, 0.1164, 0.4493, 0.0803)T, P* = (0.3905, 0.5296, 0.1295, 0.4408, 0.0850)T. We shift the equilibrium point to the origin to get the equations of m and p. By using the MATLAB LMI Toolbox, the LMIs (38) and (39) hold with ρ = 0.0163,

graphic file with name M87.gif

Hence, the equilibrium point of the considered model without the parameter uncertainties is globally power-rate stable in mean square, and the power convergence rate α is satisfied 0 < α < log1.25 2.0476. Simulation result is depicted in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Transient behavior of m1m2m3m4m5p1p2p3p4p5 with different parameters

Conclusions

In this paper, the global robust power-rate stability in mean square is studied for genetic regulatory networks with unbounded time-varying delay, noise perturbations and parameter uncertainties. The method combing Lyapunov stability theory, Itô’s differential formula and linear matrix inequality (LMI) approach was adopted to study this issue. Sufficient criterion ensuring global robust power-rate stability (in mean square) of the genetic regulatory networks is given, which is expressed in terms of linear matrix inequalities. Meanwhile, when the parameter uncertainties vanish, sufficient criterion ensuring global power-rate stability (in mean square) of the genetic regulatory networks is also provided. The boundedness and differentiability of the time delay function is removed in this paper. Also, the conditions which we obtain are easy to be verified and checked in practice.

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the editor’s work and the reviewers’s insightful comments and constructive suggestions.

Footnotes

This work was jointly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 60874088, the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China under Grant BK2009271, and the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education under Grant 20070286003.

Contributor Information

Yanyan Wang, Email: wxdyanyan@gmail.com.

Jinde Cao, Email: jdcaoseu@gmail.com, Email: jdcao@seu.edu.cn.

References

  1. Arnold L. Stochastic differential equations: theory and applications. London: Wiley; 1974. [Google Scholar]
  2. Austin DW, Allen MS, McCollum JM, Dar RD, Wilgus JR, Sayler GS, Samatova NF, Cox CD, Simpson ML. Gene network shaping of inherent noise spectra. Nature. 2006;439:608–611. doi: 10.1038/nature04194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Becskei A, Serrano L. Engineering stability in gene networks by autoregulation. Nature. 2000;405:590–593. doi: 10.1038/35014651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bolouri H, Davidson EH. Modelling transcriptional regulatory networks. BioEssay. 2002;24:1118–1129. doi: 10.1002/bies.10189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Boyd S, EI Ghaoui L, Feron E, Balakrishman V. Linear matrix inequalities in system and control theory. Phiadelphia: SIAM; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bratsun D, Volfson D, Tsimring LS, Hasty J. Delay-induced stochastic oscillations in gene regulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102(41):14593–14598. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0503858102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cao J, Ren F. Exponential stability of discrete-time genetic regulatory networks with delays. IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 2008;19(3):520–523. doi: 10.1109/TNN.2007.911748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen L, Aihara K. Stability of genetic regulatory networks with time delay. IEEE Trans CAS-I. 2002;49:602–608. doi: 10.1109/TCSI.2002.1001949. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen T, Wang L. Power-rate global stability of dynamical systems with unbounded time-varying delays. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst II: Exp Briefs. 2007;54(8):705–709. doi: 10.1109/TCSII.2007.898476. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen L, Wang R, Zhou T, Aihara K. Noise-induced cooperative behavior in a multicell system. Bioinform. 2005;21:2722–2729. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jong H. Modelling and simulation of genetic regulatory systems: a literature review. J Comp Biol. 2002;9:67–103. doi: 10.1089/10665270252833208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Elowitz MB, Leibler S. A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators. Nature. 2000;403:335–338. doi: 10.1038/35002125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Elowitz MB, et al. Stochastic gene expression in a single cell. Science. 2002;297:1183–1186. doi: 10.1126/science.1070919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gardner TS, Cantor CR, Collins JJ. Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli. Nature. 2000;403:339–342. doi: 10.1038/35002131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. He W, Cao J. Robust stability of genetic regulatory networks with distributed delay. Cogn Neurodyn. 2008;2:355–361. doi: 10.1007/s11571-008-9062-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Li C, Chen L, Aihara K (2006a) Transient resetting:A novel mechanism for synchrony and its biological examples. PLoS Comput Biol 2(8):e103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  17. Li C, Chen L, Aihara K. Stability of genetic networks with SUM regulatory logic: Lur‘s system and LMI approach. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I, Reg Pap. 2006;53(11):2451–2458. doi: 10.1109/TCSI.2006.883882. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Li C, Chen L, Aihara K. Synchronization of coupled nonidentical genetic oscillators. Phys Biol. 2006;3:37–44. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/3/1/004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Li C, Chen L, Aihara K. Stochastic stability of genetic networks with disturbance attenuation. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst II. 2007;54(10):892–896. doi: 10.1109/TCSII.2007.901631. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Liao X, Chen G, Sanchezm EN. Delay-dependent exponential stability analysis of delayed neural networks: an LMI approach. Neural Netw. 2002;15:855–866. doi: 10.1016/S0893-6080(02)00041-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Liu Y, Wang R, Zhang Z, Jiao X (2009) Analysis of stability of neural network with inhibitory neurons. Cogn Neurodyn doi:10.1007/s11571-009-9100-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  22. McAdams H, Shapiro L. Circuit simulation of genetic networks. Science. 1995;269:650–656. doi: 10.1126/science.7624793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Monk NAM. Oscillatory expression of Hes1, p53, and NF-κB driven by transcriptional time delays. Curr Biol. 2003;13:1409–1413. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00494-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Paulsson J. Summing up the noise in gene networks. Nature. 2004;427:415–418. doi: 10.1038/nature02257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Paulsson J, Ehrenberg M. Noise in a minimal regulatory network: Plasmid copy number control. Q Rev Biophys. 2001;34:1–59. doi: 10.1017/S0033583501003663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Raser JM, OShea EK. Noise in gene expression: origins, consequences, and control. Science. 2005;309:2010–2013. doi: 10.1126/science.1105891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ren F, Cao J. Asymptotic and robust stability of genetic regulatory networks with time-varying delays. Neurocomputing. 2008;71:834–842. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2007.03.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Smolen P, Baxter DA, Byrne JH. Mathematical modeling of gene networks. Neuron. 2000;26(3):567–580. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81194-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Smolen P, Baxter DA, Byrne JH. A reduced model clarifies the role of feedback loops and time delays in the Drosophila circadian oscillator. Biophy J. 2002;83:2349–2359. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75249-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wang R, Zhang Z (2006) A new mechanism on brain information processing: energy coding. Appl Phys Lett 89:306-313
  31. Wang Z, Yang F, Ho DWC, Swift S, Tucker A, Liu X. Robust filtering for gene expression time series data with variance constraints. Int J Comput Math. 2007;84(5):619–633. doi: 10.1080/00207160701456934. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wang R, Zhang Z, Chen G (2009a) Energy coding and energy functions for local activities of the brain. Neurocomputing. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2009.02.022
  33. Wang Z, Liu G, Sun Y, Wu H. Robust stability of stochastic delayed genetic regulatory networks. Cogn Neurodyn. 2009;3:271–280. doi: 10.1007/s11571-009-9077-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Xu B, Tao Y. External noise and feedback regulation: steady-state statistics of auto-regulatory genetic network. J Theor Biol. 2006;243(2):214–221. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Yu W, Lü J, Chen G, Duan Z, Zhou Q. Estimating uncertain delayed genetic regulatory networks: an adaptive filtering approach. IEEE Trans Automat Contr. 2009;54(4):892–897. doi: 10.1109/TAC.2008.2010972. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Zeng Z, Wang J, Liao X. Global asymptotic stability and global exponential stability of neural networks with unbounded time-varying delays. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst II: Exp Briefs. 2005;52(3):168–173. doi: 10.1109/TCSII.2004.842047. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Zou Z, Wang Y. Robust stability criterion for delayed cellular neural networks with norm-bounded uncertainties. IET Control Theory Appl. 2007;1(1):387–392. doi: 10.1049/iet-cta:20060056. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cognitive Neurodynamics are provided here courtesy of Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

RESOURCES