Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1980 Feb;17(2):226–228. doi: 10.1128/aac.17.2.226

Pharmacology of a New 1-Oxa-β-lactam (LY127935) in Normal Volunteers

James N Parsons 1, Joseph M Romano 1, Matthew E Levison 1
PMCID: PMC283762  PMID: 6446259

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics of 1-oxa-β-lactam (LY127935), a new semisynthetic β-lactam antibiotic, was studied in four healthy adult volunteers (mean age of 27 years, mean body surface area ± standard error [SE] of 1.87 ± 0.08 m2, and mean creatinine clearance ± SE of 116 ± 12 ml/min per 1.73 m2). Immediately after completion of a 1-g, 20-min intravenous (i.v.) infusion, the mean serum level ± SE was 70.7 ± 8.5 μg/ml. After a 1-g intramuscular (i.m.) injection, peak serum levels occurred from 30 min to 1 h, and the mean peak serum level ± SE was 52.3 ± 1.6 μg/ml. Beginning at 1 h, the serum concentrations after i.m. administration were higher than those after i.v. administration. At 8 h, the mean serum level ± SE was 3.8 ± 0.6 μg/ml after completion of the i.v. infusion and 4.8 ± 0.7 μg/ml after the i.m. injection. The mean serum half-lives for the β phase i.v. and i.m. administration were similar (2.3 ± 0.7 h and 2.4 ± 0.2 h, respectively). The mean apparent volume of distribution ± SE was 16.6 ± 1.9 liters per 1.73 m2. The mean serum clearance ± SE of LY127935 was 85.4 ± 12.7 ml/min per 1.73 m2, and the mean renal clearance ± SE was 54.5 ± 4.4 ml/min per 1.73 m.2 Urine concentrations of LY127935 were at least 140 μg/ml in each volunteer during the first 12 h after i.m. or i.v. administration. The mean percentages of the dose recovered in the urine ± SE within 2 h after i.v. or i.m. administration were similar (30 ± 4 and 34 ± 11, respectively). Only 67 ± 3% and 75 ± 13% were recovered in the urine within 24 h after i.v. and i.m. administration, respectively.

Full text

PDF
226

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Fong I. W., Ralph E. D., Engelking E. R., Kirby W. M. Clinical pharmacology of cefamandole as compared with cephalothin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Jan;9(1):65–69. doi: 10.1128/aac.9.1.65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kirby W. M., Regamey C. Pharmacokinetics of cefazolin compared with four other cephalosporins. J Infect Dis. 1973 Oct;128(Suppl):S341–S346. doi: 10.1093/infdis/128.supplement_2.s341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kohsaka M., Demain A. L. Conversion of penicillin N to cephalosporin(s) by cell-free extracts of Cephalosporium acremonium. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1976 May 17;70(2):465–473. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(76)91069-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Neu H. C. Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of cefamandole and other cephalosporin compounds. J Infect Dis. 1978 May;137 (Suppl):S80–S87. doi: 10.1093/infdis/137.supplement.s80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ries K., Levison M. E., Kaye D. Clinical and in vitro evaluation of cefazolin, a new cephalosporin antibiotic. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1973 Feb;3(2):168–174. doi: 10.1128/aac.3.2.168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES