Abstract
Background
Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is a common disease affecting up to 5% of pregnancies and which can cause fetal arrhythmia and sudden intrauterine death. We previously demonstrated that bile acid taurocholate (TC), which is raised in the bloodstream of ICP, can acutely alter the rate and rhythm of contraction and induce abnormal calcium destabilization in cultured neonatal rat cardiomyocytes (NRCM). Apart from their hepatic functions bile acids are ubiquitous signalling molecules with diverse systemic effects mediated by either the nuclear receptor FXR or by a recently discovered G-protein coupled receptor TGR5. We aim to investigate the mechanism of bile-acid induced arrhythmogenic effects in an in-vitro model of the fetal heart.
Methods and Results
Levels of bile acid transporters and nuclear receptor FXR were studied by quantitative real time PCR, western blot and immunostaining, which showed low levels of expression. We did not observe functional involvement of the canonical receptors FXR and TGR5. Instead, we found that TC binds to the muscarinic M2 receptor in NRCM and serves as a partial agonist of this receptor in terms of inhibitory effect on intracellular cAMP and negative chronotropic response. Pharmacological inhibition and siRNA-knockdown of the M2 receptor completely abolished the negative effect of TC on contraction, calcium transient amplitude and synchronisation in NRCM clusters.
Conclusion
We conclude that in NRCM the TC-induced arrhythmia is mediated by the partial agonism at the M2 receptor. This mechanism might serve as a promising new therapeutic target for fetal arrhythmia.
Introduction
Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is a maternal metabolical disease characterised by raised maternal serum bile acids. It can be complicated by fetal distress, intrauterine death, and pre-term labour [1]–[4]. ICP is common, affecting 1 in 200 pregnancies in the UK [5]and is more prevalent in other countries, e.g. Chile where it affects up to 5% of pregnant women [6]. The aetiology of the fetal death is poorly understood. It is thought to occur suddenly, as there is no evidence of preceding utero-placental insufficiency and the fetal autopsy is normal[1]. Bradycardia and an abnormal fetal heart rate (≤100 or ≥180 beats/minute) have been observed in some studies with ICP [7], [8]. Furthermore there was a case report of fetal tachyarrhythmia in association with atrial flutter during labour in ICP [9]. Tauro-conjugated primary bile acids predominate in cholestatic pregnancies, and our previous work has focussed on the influence of a tauro-conjugate of cholic acid (TC) on cardiomyocyte function[10]. Previously, we hypothesised that raised fetal serum bile acids in ICP cause fetal arrhythmia and sudden intrauterine death and demonstrated that TC can acutely alter the rate and rhythm of cardiomyocyte contraction and cause abnormal Ca2+ dynamics of single cells[11]. Superfusion of a culture with TC had the arrhythmogenic effects in individual cells, such as a reduction in amplitude of contraction as well as Ca2+ related arrhythmias [11], [12]. However, the molecular mechanisms of bile-acid induced arrhythmogenesis are still elusive.
There is growing evidence that bile acids are versatile signalling molecules endowed with systemic endocrine functions[13]. It is likely that transport of bile acids across the plasma membrane can influence their adverse effects on contraction and calcium dynamics. The repertoire and properties of fetal transporter proteins may differ from those in the adult and this may explain the more potent effect of bile acids on fetal cardiomyocytes. In hepatocytes, bile acids are tightly regulated due to their inherent toxicity[14], [15]. Transported into the cell, bile acids modulate several nuclear hormone receptors including farnesoid X receptor (FXR; also known as NR1H4) which regulate downstream functions in a genomic signaling manner[16]–[21]. While the pathways of bile homeostasis are becoming increasingly characterised in hepatocytes, little is known about pathways that are involved in bile acid effects on cardiomyocytes. Our previous data have confirmed that the genes encoding FXR, BSEP and MDR3 are expressed in human cardiomyocyte cultures[22], adult rat hearts, fetal rat hearts and neonatal rat cardiomyocyte cultures.
Recently, a bile acid-specific G-protein-coupled receptor TGR5 (also known as GPBAR1, M-BAR and BG37) has been identified[23]. This receptor has been associated with immunomodulatory properties of bile acids[23] and some hepatic functions[24]. In endothelial cells TGR5 regulates nitric oxide production via cyclic AMP-dependent activation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase[25]. However, the presence of TGR5 in cardiomyocytes has not been investigated. Some other reports have suggested that bile acids might affect muscarinic cholinergic receptor signaling[26]. Stimulation of muscarinic receptors on colon cancer cells by bile acids was attributed to cell proliferation and neoplasia[26]. The bile acid TLCA has been shown to interact with M3 isoform of muscarinic receptor in chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing rat or human muscarinic receptor [27] . In some other cell types such as gastrointestinal smooth muscle cells, biliary epithelium, vascular endothelium and dermal neurons bile acids have been suggested to interact with muscarinic receptors. However, little is known about the possible action of bile acids on cardiac muscarinic receptors[26].
Here we extensively investigated the mechanism of bile-acid induced arrhythmogenesis and found that TC is a partial agonist of the muscarinic M2 receptor and that its arrhythmogenic effect in fetal cardiomyocytes is mediated via inhibition of cAMP and impairment of contraction.
Results
Fxr and TGR5 are not involved in TC-induced arrhythmia
Initially we investigated whether the bile acids act through receptors on the cell surface and whether they are transported into the cytoplasm of NRCM where they interact with nuclear receptors. First we quantified the cellular uptake of radioactively labeled TC which appeared to be negligible in NRCM compared to primary human hepatocytes (Fig. 1a). We studied nuclear translocation of fxr, as a marker of fxr activation. We did not observe significant translocation of fxr in NRCM treated with TC as observed in human hepatocyte cell line Huh7 after 5 minutes treatment with TC (Fig. 1b). Therefore interaction with nuclear receptors was not considered to be of relevance to cardiac cells. Indeed, expression of bile transporters in cardiomyocytes was generally lower than in hepatocytes (Table S1) and, importantly, despite its abundant expression in cardiomyocytes (Fig. 1c), fxr did not show a typical redistribution from the cytoplasm to the nucleus upon treatment with bile acids (Fig. 1b,d). Likewise, we could not detect any expression of the bile acid specific TGR5 in NRCM by immunohystochemistry (Fig. 2a). In line with these findings, agonists of fxr (GW4064) and TGR5 (oleanolic acid) also did not influence cardiomyocyte contraction, nor did they protect against TC-induced arrhythmia (Fig. 2b).
TC is a partial agonist at the muscarinic M2 receptor
Since the involvement of muscarinic receptors in bile acid signalling has been previously suggested in non-cardiac cells[26], we sought to investigate whether TC can bind to and activate the M2 receptor subtype, which is most relevant for cardiomyocyte physiology. First, we prepared cell membranes from cultured neonatal cardiomyocytes and performed radioligand binding assays with the muscarinic receptor antagonist N-methylscopolamine. Similar to our observations in muscarinic receptor-overexpressing CHO-M2 cells (Fig. S1), competitive binding displacement experiments showed that TC can bind to the muscarinic receptors endogenously expressed on cardiomyocytes with an apparent Kd of ∼17 µmol/L (Fig. 3a).
To study whether TC can act as a ligand of the M2 receptor and induce downstream signaling responses, we analyzed the inhibitory effect of TC on cAMP production in NRCM expressing the FRET-based cAMP sensor Epac2-camps[28]. Treatment of cells with TC led to a decrease in basal cAMP levels which reached its maximum after ∼1 min, similar to the full receptor agonist carbachol. However, the TC-induced inhibition was partial (∼30%) compared to the effect of carbachol (Fig. 3b, c), suggesting that TC acts as a partial agonist of this receptor.
Muscarinic M2 receptor mediates TC effects of cardiac contraction
Prior to addition of TC the NRCM contracted spontaneously at a rate of about 106 bpm±6.08 (mean±SEM, n = 5). When TC 0.2 mmol/L and 1 mmol/L were added to the culture medium of these cells there was a significant reduction in the rate of contraction, 61.20 bpm±5.33 and 61.32 bpm±7.55 (mean±SD, n = 6. P<0.001) respectively (Fig. 4a, c). To investigate whether the inhibitory effect of TC on cardiomyocyte contraction is mediated by muscarinic receptors, we used pharmacological inhibition and knock-down approaches. Preincubation with either pertussis toxin to inhibit Gi–proteins or with the M2 receptor-specific inhibitor methoctramine abolished the negative chronotropic effect of TC after 10 minutes treatment with either 0.2 or 1 mmol/L TC (Fig. 4a, c). The muscarinic receptor agonist, carbachol, caused a similar reduction in contractility to that observed with TC but with much higher potency (Fig. 4b). In contrast, preincubation with either M1 receptor-specific inhibitor pirenzepine or M3 receptor-specific inhibitor 4-diphenylacetoxy-N-methylpiperidinemethiodide did not inhibit the bile acid-induced reduction in contraction (Fig. 4c), suggesting that M2 receptors are responsible for the effect of TC on contraction. We further confirmed this observation by siRNA knockdown of the M2 receptor. Transfection of NRCM with siRNA led to a 65% reduction in the receptor mRNA expression (Fig. S3) and and substantially reduced the impact of high concentration of TC 1 mmol/L (Fig. 4d) and 0.1 mmol/L carbachol on the rates of contraction (Fig. S2).
The data obtained using optical contractility measurements were further substantiated by scanning ion conductance microscopy (SICM), a new advanced microscopic technique. Recordings of the vertical displacement of contractions by SICM revealed that TC not only reduced the frequency of contraction but also made cardiomyocyte contraction irregular (Fig. 5a,b,e, Fig. S4). However, this TC effect was abolished by M2 receptor knockdown (Fig. 5c, d, e), even at a TC concentration of 1 mmol/L. (Fig. S5).
Functional involvement of the muscarinic M2 receptor in the TC-induced calcium desynchronization
The effect of TC on calcium desynchronization and the involvement of M2 receptors in this process were investigated in small 3 days old NRCM clusters (∼100×100 µm, Fig. 6a, Video S1). Optical recordings of Ca2+ transient amplitude for 4 seconds before and after acute exposure (20 min) to 0.2 mmol/L TC showed a complete loss of Ca2+ transient synchronisation in control clusters and in clusters of cells transfected with scrambled siRNA clusters after TC treatment (Fig. 6b,c, Video S1). In contrast, cell clusters transfected with siRNA targeting the M2 receptor, did not show these abnormalities (Fig. 6d). The maximum Ca2+ peak in the presence of TC scaled to pre-treatment clusters showed a significant reduction in control and non-targeting siRNA knockdown (P<0.05) clusters, whereas the reduction in clusters with siRNA transfection was less marked and comparable with the control group (Fig. 6b-d, Table 1).
Table 1. Effects of 0.2 mmol/L TC on Ca2+ amplitude and percentage of desynchronized cluster after treatment with TC.
Condition of cells | Percentage of calcium peak reduction compared to pre-treatment (Means ± SEM) | Loss of Ca 2+ Transient Synchronization after TC (% of cells) |
Control | 45.4±11.35 | 67 |
Scrambled siRNA | 38.7±3.87 | 70 |
siRNA M2 | 7.6±0.28 | 3.57 |
Data are normalized to pre treatment condition and scale accordingly to dF/F 10%, n>5 observations.
Discussion
ICP is a severe disease of pregnancy associated with detrimental effects of bile acids on the fetal heart. The molecular mechanisms of this cardiotoxicity have remained elusive. To unravel the mechanism of the bile-acid induced arrhythmia, we first hypothesized that the effects of nuclear receptors activated by bile acids transported into cardiac cells might be involved. However, we have shown that all the main bile acid transporters are expressed at relatively low levels in the fetal heart and in neonatal cardiomyocyte cultures. Our data are consistent with previous published data [29].
Interestingly, the nuclear receptor FXR [30], [31] which regulates target genes that influence bile, glucose homeostasis and lipoprotein metabolism in the liver is highly expressed not only in bile acid-target organs, like liver and gut but also in the kidney, adrenal glands, thymus and heart[32]–[34]. It has been suggested that FXR ligands play roles in cardiovascular diseases[34], [35].
Surprisingly, although the bile acid nuclear receptor fxr is expressed in cardiomyocytes, it did not undergo nuclear translocation upon treatment with TC (Fig. 1). In line with the data on low expression levels of bile acid transporters in cardiomyocytes (Table S2), the uptake of radioactively labeled TC into these cells was negligible compared to human hepatocytes, and the fxr receptor agonist GW4064 had no effect on contraction.
This led us to hypothesise that TC acts on cardiomyocytes via membrane receptors. The well-characterized membrane receptor for bile-acids TGR5 was not expressed in these cells, whereas other G-protein-coupled receptors which play an important role in cardiac physiology, namely the muscarinic receptors, have been unexpectedly found to mediate the cardiac effects of bile acids. Here we unequivocally demonstrate that TC can bind to the muscarinic M2 receptor on the membranes of CHO-M2 cells and neonatal cardiomyocytes. TC serves as a partial agonist of this receptor. The partial agonism has been confirmed at the level of the second messenger cAMP and in several functional assays. Previous studies have known that in ventricular cardiomyocytes M2 muscarinic receptors inhibit cAMP production[36]. We show that TC induced a partial muscarinic effect at the cAMP level which was characterized by ∼30% inhibition of intracellular cAMP levels compared to carbachol (Fig. 3b,c). At the functional level, TC reduced the rate of contraction with slightly lower efficacies compared to carbachol, but the potency of TC in inhibiting contraction was much lower (Fig. 2a,b), supporting the idea of its partial agonistic effect. This effect was dependent on the Gi-proteins and was blocked by the selective M2 receptor antagonist methoctramine and not by M1 and M3 receptor antagonists (Fig. 4c). It is known that stimulation of muscarinic M2 receptors within the mammalian heart[37], [38], modulates pacemaker activity and atrioventricular conduction, and directly (in atrium) or indirectly (in ventricles) influences the force of contraction[39]. Indeed, knocking down M2 receptors in the mouse abolishes bradycardia in response to carbachol[36], emphasizing the functional importance of this receptor subtype. Stimulation of the heart with the muscarinic receptor agonist carbachol causes a decrease in heart rate (i.e. bradycardia) in mice[36].
In addition, siRNA knockdown of the M2 receptor completely abolished the negative effect of TC on contraction (Fig. 4 and 5) and protected against the arrhythmogenic effect of TC which was characterized by a pronounced calcium desynchronization (Fig. 6). While it is generally assumed that parasympathetic stimulation of the heart acts through the M2-muscarinic acetylcholine receptors to regulate channel activity and subsequent cardiac inotropic and chronotopic status, there are varieties of proposed mechanisms. The intracellular Na+ current increases in guinea pig ventricles [40]and in sheep cardiac purkinje fibers [41] in the presence of either acetylcholine or carbachol. Alteration of Na+/K+ and Na+/Ca2+ pumps was also proposed to be the M2 agonist stimulant [41], [42,42]. More recently it has been shown that the (PTX)-sensitive Gαi2 coupling protein but not Gαi3 is required for the inhibitory action of muscarinic receptor on cell contractility and L-type calcium current in adult ventricular myocytes [43].
The structural basis for the specific and functional interaction of TC with muscarinic receptors is not fully understood, but it is possible to speculate that structural similarity exists between TC and other muscarinic receptor agonists (Fig. S6). Considerable likeness can be found between the portion of carbachol and TC side chain. It is electrostatic concordance between the two molecules, rather than perfect atomic alignment that may allow for the similar interaction with the muscarinic receptor. The ester carbonyl group of carbachol which carries a partial negative charge aligns with sulfonic acid in TC, and the amide of TC aligns with the ammonium ion of carbachol. It is likely that the interaction of these molecules with muscarinic receptors is based on electrostatic binding since two other molecules with similar interaction with muscarinic receptors, LCT and acetylcholine, share overall charge composition but not the atomic alignment [26], [27].
In conclusion, we have identified partial agonism at the M2 receptor as a novel mechanism for bile acid-induced arrhythmia in a model of the fetal heart. Abolishing the M2 receptor resulted in elimination of the TC-induced-arrhythmia in cardiac tissue as revealed but the mechanical and optical mapping experiments respectively (Fig. 5, Fig. 6). The findings of this study indicate that muscarinic M2 receptor might be identified as a new therapeutic target to prevent fetal arrhythmia associated with the cholestasis of pregnancy and other diseases.
Materials and Methods
Reagents
3H-taurocholic acid (specific activity 5 Ci/mmol) and Ultima Gold scintillation cocktail were purchased from PerkinElmer (Boston, MA). All chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Gillingham, UK) unless otherwise stated.
Neonatal rat Cardiomyocytes
Ventricular neonatal rat myocytes (NRCM) were isolated from the hearts of 1–2 day old Wistar rats according to Gorelik et. al, 2002[11] and under approval from the NHLI Imperial College London ethical committee (No. 1213456789). Experimental procedures using animals were performed in accordance with the U.K. Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act, 1986. Cells were kept in plating media (DMEM supplemented with 17% Medium 199 (v/v), 10% horse serum (v/v), 5% foetal calf serum (v/v), 200 µg/ml streptomycin, 200 U/ml penicillin). Cells were used following 2–3 days culture when small networks of cardiomyocytes had formed.
3H-Taurocholate (3HTC) Influx Assay
3H-taurocholic acid (specific activity 5 Ci/mmol) and Ultima Gold scintillation cocktail were purchased from PerkinElmer (Boston, MA). All chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Gillingham, UK) unless otherwise stated. NRCM and primary human hepatocytes (material and methods S1) seeded into 24-well plates were incubated at 4°C/37°C with 250 µl of influx media consisting of 0.2 µmol/L 3HTC and 0–99.8 µmol/L TC in L-15 media for 0–60 minutes. Influx activity was stopped by washing with 500 µl of ice-cold 1 mmol/L TC and cells lysed with 250 µl of RIPA buffer (Sigma-Aldrich Gillingham, UK), 175 µl of which was mixed with 2 ml scintillation cocktail for radioactivity counting and the remainder used to assay protein quantity (Pierce BCA protein assay kit, Cramlington, UK) for normalisation. Cell membranes isolated from NRCM (20 µg protein) were incubated for 2 h at room temperature in assay buffer (25 mmol/L phosphate buffer saline, 5 mmol/L MgCl2, pH 7.4) with 0.1–10 nmol/L [3H]-N-methylscopolamine ([3H]-NMS) (Amersham, Freiburg, Germany). Nonspecific binding was determined in the presence of 10 µmol/L atropine and reactions terminated by vacuum filtration through GF/B glass fibre filters (Millipore, Schwalbach, Germany).
Radioligand binding assays
Cell membranes isolated from NRCM (20 µg protein) were incubated for 2 h at room temperature in assay buffer (25 mmol/L phosphate buffer saline, 5 mmol/L MgCl2, pH 7.4) with 0.1-10 nM [3H]-N-methylscopolamine ([3H]-NMS) (Amersham, Freiburg, Germany). Nonspecific binding was determined in the presence of 10 µmol/L atropine and reactions terminated by vacuum filtration through GF/B glass fibre filters (Millipore, Schwalbach, Germany).
RNA isolation and quantitative PCR (Q-PCR)
Total RNA was isolated from NRCM using the Qiagen RNEasy kit. 0.5 µg of RNA was reverse-transcribed using the Advantage RT-for-PCR Kit (Takara Biosciences, Saint-Germain-en-Laye, France). Relative gene expression was assayed using q-PCR detection of SYBR Green (JumpStart ReadyMix, Sigma-Aldrich), calculated using the ΔΔCt method and the following gene-transcript levels normalised to l19: ntcp, shp, fxr (n1rh4)and mrp3 (for sequences Table S2).
Nuclear protein extraction and western blot
NRCM and human hepatocytes cells line Huh7 seeded in 6-well plates were treated with 0.2 µmol/L TC for 0–60 minutes. Huh7 cells were a kind gift from Dr. Louise Collins The Rayne Institute, London. Nuclear protein was extracted with the NucBuster protein extraction kit (Novagen) according to manufacturer's protocol. Nuclear proteins were run on a 10% SDS-PAGE and analyzed by western blot. For detection of fxr protein, cells were lysed in ice-cold RIPA buffer and sonicated for 45 seconds on ice. Lysates were centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 15 minutes at 4°C. Protein concentration was determined using the BCA assay kit (Perbio), 30 µg protein was fractionated on 10% SDS-PAGE gels and transferred to Protran nitrocellulose membrane (Schleicher and Schuell) by submerged transfer apparatus (Bio-Rad) in (25 mmol/L,Tris, 192 mmol/L glycine, 20% v/v methanol. Membranes were blocked for 1 hour at room temperature with 5% nonfat milk in PBS containing 0.05% Tween-20 and incubated with antibodies specific to fxr (1∶2000) or β-Actin (1∶10000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) overnight at 4°C. The blots were probed with 1∶7000 dilution of horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-mouse IgG and visualized using the ECL system (Amersham Biosciences). Blots were exposed to autoradiographic X-ray film and bands were quantified with ImageJ software and normalised again to β-Actin.
Immunohistochemistry and Immunocytochemistry
Preparations were washed with PBS, fixed for 10 minutes with 4% (v/v) formaldehyde, washed with PBS and permeabilized for 40 minutes with 0.2% Triton X-100 (v/v). Post-permeabilisation, NRCM were blocked with 0.1% bovine serum albumin (w/v) for 15 minutes and subsequently probed overnight at 4°C with an anti-fxr antibody (1∶100; R&D Systems). Following antibody incubation, NRCM were incubated with fluorescein-conjugated secondary antibody for 1 hour at RT. NRCM nuclei were stained with DAPI for 20 minutes at 37°C. The cells were washed with PBS and the coverslips were mounted on glass slides using Vectashield.
For immunofluorescent studies, isolated rat Kupffer cells and neonatal cardiomyocytes were seeded on glass coverslips and fixed in 100% methanol (5 min, −20°C). Cryosections (5 µm) of perfused rat liver were prepared with a Leica cryotome, air-dried for 1 hour and fixed in 100% methanol (5 min, −20°C). An antibody against the C-terminus (aa 306–329) of rat TGR5 was used at 1∶150[25]. A Cyanin-3 conjugated secondary antibody (Jackson Immuno Research Laboratories, West Grove, PA) was diluted 1∶500 and Hoechst 34580 (Invitrogen) was added at 1∶10,000 respectively. Immunostained samples were analyzed on Zeiss LSM 510 META confocal microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) using the same settings for all samples.
Assessment of beating frequencies
Beating frequencies in each cell were visually recorded according to Clark et. al. (1991)[44]. Cardiomyocytes were pre-incubated at 37°C humidified with 5% CO2 with 1 µmol/L atropine, 1 µmol/L methoctramine, 1 µmol/L pirenzepine, 1 µmol/L 4-DAMP, 100 µmol/L carbachol (CCh), 50 nmol/L Pertussin Toxin (PTX), 100 µmol/L oleanolic acid (0.1 mmol/L) or 10 µM GW4064 for 30 minutes pre-bile acid treatment. NRCM contraction rates were counted under a light microscope. NRCM were treated with 0.2/1 mmol/L TC for 10 minutes and contraction rate re-counted.
siRNA-mediated Gene Silencing of chrm2
siRNA against M2 and control scramble sequences were purchased from Thermo Scientific Dharmacon (siM2 catalogue M-092972, siScramble catalogue D-001210). 100 nmol/L concentration of siM2/Scramble was transfected into 60–70% confluent NRCM using Dharmafect1 for 48 hours according to manufacturer's protocol. Post-transfection, NRCM were washed and cultured in phenol red free DMEM with 2% DCC-FCS. M2 knockdown levels were assessed with qRT-PCR.
Measurement of contraction using Scanning Ion Conductance Microscope (SICM)
The scanning ion conductance microscope (SICM) provides accurate measurement of the rate, rhythm and amplitude of contraction on NRCM. The physiological L-15 medium (Gibco, Parsley, UK) was used as the bath and micropipette solution.
Optical recording of Calcium transients
The characteristics of Ca2+ transients were assessed optically after staining the preparations with 5 µg/ml of Fluo-4 AM (Invitrogen) for 20 min at 37°C. During the experiments, preparations were continually superfused at 36°C with Hanks' balanced salt solution (HBSS) containing (mmol/L) NaCl 137, KCl 5.4, CaCl2 1.3, MgSO4 0.8, NaHCO3 4.2, KH2PO4 0.5, NaH2PO4 0.3 and HEPES 10. The solution was titrated to pH 7.40 with 1 mol/L NaOH. Changes in fluorescence corresponding to intracellular Ca2+ changes were assessed using a fast CMOS camera (MiCAM Ultima, Scimedia) coupled to a Nikon inverted microscope Ti/U equipped for epifluorescence (magnification 20×, N.A 0.75). This system is able to record calcium activity in an area measuring 1 mm×1 mm with a spatial resolution of 5 µm and a temporal resolution of 1 ms. The assessment of calcium transient in a given preparation was limited to 2-5 recordings, 4 s each, in order to avoid phototoxic effects of the dyes. Optical raw data were analyzed using dedicated software from the camera manufacturer (BVAnalyze V8.02, SciMedia). After offset correction the maximum dF/F was setting at 10% in order to scale the traces with the Ca2+ amplitude measured in pre-treated preparations. Experiments were performed with 3-day-old preparations.
Acute effect of Taurocholate on Calcium Transient
After measuring Ca2+transients in normal superfusion solution (HBSS), the same preparations (control, scramble and siRNA M2) were superfused with an HBSS solution containing TC 0.2 mmol/L and Ca2+ transients were recorded again after 20 min perfusion in the same conditions. Cardiomyocyte clusters were included in the analysis if they fulfilled the following criteria: (i) the clusters had to denote spontaneous beating activity, (ii) the clusters had to consist only of cardiomyocytes and (iii) the clusters had to be isolated with a maximum dimension of 100×100 µm.
FRET imaging of cAMP
FRET imaging of cAMP in living neonatal cardiomyocytes was performed in cells infected for 48 h with Epac2-camps adenovirus. Cells were washed twice and measured at room temperature in buffer A. The imaging system was built around a Nikon TE2000 microscope equipped with a mercury lamp (HB0103W/2, Osram), EX436/20 excitation filter combined with DM455 dichroic mirror. Cell fluorescence was split into YFP and CFP channels using a DualView (Optical Insights) equipped with 535/40 and 480/30 emission filters and monitored by the ORCA-ER CCD camera (Hamamatsu, Welwyn Garden City, UK). FRET ratios were corrected for the bleedthrough of CFP into the YFP channel and analyzed using Origin software (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA).
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We thank Silvia Baumann for her help with chemical structure composition and Christian Dees for his technical help.
Footnotes
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Funding: This work was supported by Action Medical Research, the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Trust, Universiti Teknologi MARA in Malaysia and the Biomedical Research Centre at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Fisk NM, Storey GNB. Fetal outcome in obstetric cholestasis. British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 1988;95:1137–1143. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1988.tb06791.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Reid R, Ivey KJ, Rencoret RH, Storey B. Fetal complications of obstetric cholestasis. British medical journal. 1976;1:870–872. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6014.870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Reyes H. The Enigma of Intra-Hepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy - Lessons from Chile. Hepatology. 1982;2:87–96. doi: 10.1002/hep.1840020114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rioseco AJ, Ivankovic MB, Manzur A, Hamed F, Kato SR, et al. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: a retrospective case-control study of perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170:890–895. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(94)70304-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Abedin P, Weaver JB, Egginton E. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: prevalence and ethnic distribution. Ethn Health. 1999;4:35–37. doi: 10.1080/13557859998173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Geenes V, Williamson C. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2009;15:2049–2066. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.2049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Laatikainen TJ. Fetal bile acid levels in pregnancies complicated by maternal intrahepatic cholestasis. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 1975;122:852–856. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(75)90727-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Laatikainen T, Tulenheimo A. Maternal serum bile acid levels and fetal distress in cholestasis of pregnancy. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 1984;22:91–94. doi: 10.1016/0020-7292(84)90019-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Al Inizi S, Gupta R, Gale A. Fetal tachyarrhythmia with atrial flutter in obstetric cholestasis. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2006;93:53–54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.12.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gorelik J, Shevchuk A, Swiet M, Lab M, Korchev Y, et al. Comparison of the arrhythmogenic effects of tauro- and glycoconjugates of cholic acid in an in vitro study of rat cardiomyocytes. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2004;111:867–870. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00166.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gorelik J, Harding SE, Shevchuk AI, Koralage D, Lab M, et al. Taurocholate induces changes in rat cardiomyocyte contraction and calcium dynamics. Clin Sci. 2002;103:191–200. doi: 10.1042/cs1030191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Williamson C, Gorelik J, Eaton BM, Lab M, de Swiet M, et al. The bile acid taurocholate impairs rat cardiomyocyte function: a proposed mechanism for intra-uterine fetal death in obstetric cholestasis. Clin Sci. 2001;100:363–369. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Thomas C, Pellicciari R, Pruzanski M, Auwerx J, Schoonjans K. Targeting bile-acid signalling for metabolic diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008;7:678–693. doi: 10.1038/nrd2619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Danielsson H, Sjovall J. Bile Acid Metabolism. Annual Review of Biochemistry. 1975;44:233–253. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.44.070175.001313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Eloranta JJ, Kullak-Ublick GA. The Role of FXR in Disorders of Bile Acid Homeostasis. Physiology. 2008;23:286–295. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00020.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lew JL, Zhao A, Yu J, Huang L, de Pedro N, et al. The Farnesoid X Receptor Controls Gene Expression in a Ligand- and Promoter-selective Fashion. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:8856–8861. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M306422200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gerloff T, Stieger B, Hagenbuch B, Madon J, Landmann L, et al. The Sister of P-glycoprotein Represents the Canalicular Bile Salt Export Pump of Mammalian Liver. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:10046–10050. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.16.10046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Denson LA, Sturm E, Echevarria W, Zimmerman TL, Makishima M, et al. The Orphan Nuclear Receptor, shp, Mediates Bile Acid-Induced Inhibition of the Rat Bile Acid Transporter, ntcp. Gastroenterology. 2001;121:140–147. doi: 10.1053/gast.2001.25503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Pauli-Magnus C, Stieger B, Meier Y, Kullak-Ublick GA, Meier PJ. Enterohepatic transport of bile salts and genetics of cholestasis. Journal of Hepatology. 2005;43:342–357. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hagenbuch B, Dawson P. The sodium bile salt cotransport family SLC10. Pflugers Archiv. 2004;447:566–570. doi: 10.1007/s00424-003-1130-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hagenbuch B, Meier PJ. Organic anion transporting polypeptides of the OATP/SLC21 family: phylogenetic classification as OATP/SLCO superfamily, new nomenclature and molecular/functional properties. Pflugers Archiv. 2004;447:653–665. doi: 10.1007/s00424-003-1168-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gorelik J, Yang LQ, Zhang Y, Lab M, Korchev Y, et al. A novel Z-groove index characterizing myocardial surface structure. Cardiovasc Res. 2006;72:422–429. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2006.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kawamata Y, Fujii R, Hosoya M, Harada M, Yoshida H, et al. A G Protein-coupled Receptor Responsive to Bile Acids. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:9435–9440. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M209706200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Vassileva G, Golovko A, Markowitz L, Abbondanzo SJ, Zeng M, et al. Targeted deletion of Gpbar1 protects mice from cholesterol gallstone formation. Biochem J. 2006;398:423–430. doi: 10.1042/BJ20060537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Keitel V, Reinehr R, Gatsios P, Rupprecht C, Görg B, et al. The G-protein coupled bile salt receptor TGR5 is expressed in liver sinusoidal endothelial cells. Hepatology. 2007;45:695–704. doi: 10.1002/hep.21458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Raufman JP. Activation of muscarinic receptor signaling by bile acids: physiological and medical implications. Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 2003;48:1431–1444. doi: 10.1023/a:1024733500950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Raufman JP, Chen Y, Cheng K, Compadre C, Compadre L, et al. Selective interaction of bile acids with muscarinic receptors: a case of molecular mimicry. European Journal of Pharmacology. 2002;457:77–84. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(02)02690-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Nikolaev VO, Gambaryan S, Engelhardt S, Walter U, Lohse MJ. Real-time monitoring of the PDE2 activity of live cells: hormone-stimulated cAMP hydrolysis is faster than hormone-stimulated cAMP synthesis. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:1716–1719. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C400505200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Couture L, Nash JA, Turgeon J. The ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters and Their Implication in Drug Disposition: A Special Look at the Heart. Pharmacol Rev. 2006;58:244–258. doi: 10.1124/pr.58.2.7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Makishima M, Okamoto AY, Repa JJ, Tu H, Learned RM, et al. Identification of a Nuclear Receptor for Bile Acids. Science. 1999;284:1362–1365. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5418.1362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Parks DJ, Blanchard SG, Bledsoe RK, Chandra G, Consler TG, et al. Bile Acids: Natural Ligands for an Orphan Nuclear Receptor. Science. 1999;284:1365–1368. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5418.1365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Forman BM, Umesono K, Chen J, Evans RM. Unique response pathways are established by allosteric interactions among nuclear hormone receptors. Cell. 1995;81:541–550. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90075-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Otte K, Kranz H, Kober I, Thompson P, Hoefer M, et al. Identification of Farnesoid X Receptor β as a Novel Mammalian Nuclear Receptor Sensing Lanosterol. Mol Cell Biol. 2003;23:864–872. doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.3.864-872.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bishop-Bailey D, Walsh DT, Warner TD. Expression and activation of the farnesoid X receptor in the vasculature. PNAS. 2004;101:3668–3673. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0400046101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Guo GL, Santamarina-Fojo S, Akiyama TE, Amar MJA, Paigen BJ, et al. Effects of FXR in foam-cell formation and atherosclerosis development. Biochimica et biophysica acta Molecular and cell biology of lipids. 2006;1761:1401. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2006.09.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Stengel PW, Yamada M, Wess J, Cohen ML. M3-receptor knockout mice: muscarinic receptor function in atria, stomach fundus, urinary bladder, and trachea. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2002;282:R1443–R1449. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00486.2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Caulfield MP, Robbins J, Higashida H, Brown DA. Postsynaptic Actions of Acetylcholine - the Coupling of Muscarinic Receptor Subtypes to Neuronal Ion Channels. Progress in Brain Research. 1993;98:293–301. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6123(08)62411-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hulme EC, Birdsall NJM, Buckley NJ. Muscarinic Receptor Subtypes. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology. 1990;30:633–673. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pa.30.040190.003221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Dhein S, van Koppen CJ, Brodde OE. Muscarinic receptors in the Mammalian Heart. Pharmacological Research. 2001;44:161–182. doi: 10.1006/phrs.2001.0835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Khlkamp V. Muscarinic receptor-mediated increase of intracellular Na+ ion activity and force of contraction. Pflugers Archiv. 1985;403:266–272. doi: 10.1007/BF00583598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Iacono G, Vassalle M. Acetylcholine increases intracellular sodium activity in sheep cardiac Purkinje fibers. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 1989;256:H1407–H1416. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1989.256.5.H1407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Korth M, Sharma VK, Sheu SS. Stimulation of muscarinic receptors raises free intracellular Ca2+ concentration in rat ventricular myocytes. Circ Res. 1988;62:1080–1087. doi: 10.1161/01.res.62.6.1080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Nagata K, Ye C, Jain M, Milstone DS, Liao R, et al. al et. Gαi2 but Not Gαi3 Is Required for Muscarinic Inhibition of Contractility and Calcium Currents in Adult Cardiomyocytes. Circ Res. 2000;87:903–909. doi: 10.1161/01.res.87.10.903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Clark WA, Rudnick SJ, LaPres JJ, Lesch M, Decker RS. Hypertrophy of isolated adult feline heart cells following beta-adrenergic-induced beating. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 1991;261:C530–C542. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1991.261.3.C530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.