Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Mar 15.
Published in final edited form as: FEBS J. 2009 Apr 2;276(10):2736–2751. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.06997.x

Interactions between the APP C-terminal domain and G-proteins mediate calcium dysregulation and Aβ toxicity in Alzheimer disease

GM Shaked #, S Chauv #, K Ubhi #, LA Hansen #,, E Masliah #,
PMCID: PMC2838422  NIHMSID: NIHMS128527  PMID: 19368557

Abstract

Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) is characterized by neuropathological accumulations of Amyloid-β1–42 (Aβ1–42), a cleavage product of the Amyloid Precursor Protein (APP). Recent studies have highlighted the role of APP in Aβ-mediated toxicity and have implicated the G-protein system; however the exact mechanisms underlying this pathway are as yet undetermined.

In this context, the present study sought to investigate the role of calcium up regulation following APP-dependent Aβ-mediated G-protein activation. Initial studies on the interaction between APP, Aβ and Go proteins demonstrated that the interaction between APP, specifically its C-terminal –YENPTY- region, and Go was reduced in the presence of Aβ. Cell death and calcium influx in Aβ-treated cells were shown to be APP-dependent and to involve G-protein activation as these effects were blocked by the use of the G-protein inhibitor Pertussis Toxin (PTX). Collectively these results highlight a role for the G-protein system in APP-dependent Aβ-induced toxicity and calcium dysregulation.

Analysis of APP:Go interaction in human brain samples from AD patients at different stages of the disease revealed a decrease in the interaction correlating with disease progression. Moreover, the reduced interaction between APP and Go was shown to correlate with an increase in membranal Aβ levels and G-protein activity, showing for first time that the APP:Go interaction is present in humans and responsive to Aβ load.

The results presented here support a role for APP in Aβ-induced G-protein activation and suggest a mechanism by which basal APP binding to Go is reduced under pathological loads of Aβ, liberating Go and activating the G-protein system which may in turn result in downstream effects including calcium dysregulation. These results also suggest that specific antagonists of G-protein activity may have a therapeutic relevance in AD.

Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common neurodegenerative disorder in the elderly; it is characterized clinically by progressive cognitive decline and dementia and neuropathologically by abnormal intracellular protein aggregates called neurofibrillary tangles and extracellular protein deposits known as amyloid plaques. Amyloid plaques are composed of Amyloid-β1–42 (Aβ1–42), a cleavage product of the Amyloid Precursor Protein (APP) and many studies have suggested that the abnormal deposition of Aβ, may be causally linked to the pathogenesis of AD [1, 2]. APP itself is reported to modulate Aβ-mediated toxicity [35] however the precise mechanisms underlying APP-dependent Aβ toxicity remain a topic of intense research.

Recent work has highlighted the G-protein (guanine nucleotide-binding protein) system as playing a key role in APP-dependent Aβ-induced cell death [6]. The intracellular domain of APP (APP627-65) is reported to complex with and activate Go proteins [7, 8] while G-protein inhibitors have been demonstrated to block Aβ toxicity [6].

G-proteins are family of proteins involved in second messenger cascades and are important cellular signal transducing molecules [9]. Heterotrimeric G-proteins, composed of alpha, beta and gamma subunits, reside on the inner cell membrane surface bound to G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). Upon ligand binding the GCPR undergoes a conformation change, causing it to release the alpha subunit of the G-protein. Once activated the free G-protein αsubunit moves along the membrane and causes signal transduction throughout the cell [10]. A key cellular role of the G-protein system is the regulation of intracellular calcium levels via receptors on the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and the plasma membrane [1114].

G-protein associated signaling pathways have reported to be disrupted in AD post-mortem brains [15], this disruption has been linked to the altered coupling of G-proteins to GPCRs [16] or by altered levels of G-proteins in different regions such as the frontal cortex and hippocampus of the AD brains [17]. Intracellular calcium levels, themselves regulated by G-proteins, are also altered in AD [1820].

Given the evidence implicating the G-protein system in APP-dependent Aβ mediated toxicity [6, 7, 21, 22], and its central role in cellular calcium regulation [10, 23, 24] this study sought to investigate the role of calcium up regulation in APP-dependent Aβ toxicity in Alzheimer’s disease.

We demonstrate that in neuronal cultures Aβ is able to reduce the interaction between APP and Go, which in turn results in a G-protein activation dependent calcium dysregulation and subsequent cell death. These results were shown to be clinically relevant as immunoprecipitation analysis of the frontal cortex of AD patients at differing Braak stages revealed a progressive decrease in the interaction between APP and Go which was associated with an increase in membrane Aβ levels and G-protein activity.

Results

Aβ Modulation of the interaction between APP and Go in neuronal cultures

In order to investigate the mechanisms underlying APP-dependent Aβ toxicity and the involvement of the G-protein system, APP-deficient B103 cells were transiently transfected with full-length APP (APP695) and then incubated with Aβ (10µM) for 24 hours. Cells were lysed, the membrane fraction of the cell homogenate was isolated and immunoprecipitated with the APP-specific C-terminal G369 antibody. Immunoblot analysis of immunoprecipitated protein with an antibody for Go revealed that an interaction between APP695 and Go could be demonstrated in cells transfected with APP695 (Fig. 1A), but not in the untransfected APP-deficient B103 cells, which served as a control in this and subsequent experiments. Aβ treatment caused a decrease in the interaction between APP and Go (Fig. 1A). Aβ treatment did not affect Go levels or the APP total expression levels (Fig. 1B), which implies that the reduced interaction of APP and Go seen in the presence of Aβ is not simply due to a reduction in their respective protein levels.

Figure 1. Aβ Modulates Interaction between APP and Go in Neuronal Cultures.

Figure 1

B103 rat neuroblastoma cells were transiently transfected with APP695 (A) or the C-terminal fragment comprised of the terminal 99 amino acids of APP (C99) (D) and subsequently treated with Aβ (10µM, 24hours). Cell homogenates were purified to obtain membrane fractions which then were immunoprecipitated with the APP C-terminal specific G369 antibody, run on a SDS-PAGE gel and Go protein binding was assessed by immunoblot with a monoclonal Go antibody.

(A) Immunoprecipitation studies show a 40kDa band representing the interaction between APP695 and Go in cells transfected with APP695.

(B) Western blot analysis with the Go antibody (upper panel) demonstrates that transfection with APP695 and/or treatment with Aβ does not affect expression levels of Go or APP.

(C) Similar immunoprecipitation studies in cells that had been transfected with C99 show an interaction between the C99 region of APP and Go. As with full-length APP, this interaction was reduced in cells treated with Aβ.

(D) Western blot analysis with the G369 antibody demonstrates that expression level of APP695 is not affected by 24 hour treatment with Aβ (10µM), Pertussis toxin (PTX, 100ng/ml), or a combination of the two.

Aβ has been previously reported to interact directly with APP and a number of interaction sites have been described, one reported site maps to the N-terminus of APP [3], another to the C-terminal end of APP, specifically to a peptide composed of the C-terminal 99 amino acids of APP (C99) [5]. It has been proposed that C99 may maintain Aβ-induced toxicity similar to full length APP.

In order to examine this issue further we investigated whether the C99 C-terminal fragment was capable of interacting with Go in a manner similar to full length APP. To this end B103 cells were transiently transfected with C99 and similarly treated with 10µM Aβ for 24 hours and underwent the same immunoprecipitation procedure as above. In this case, similar to cells transfected with full length APP, cells transfected with C99 also demonstrated an interaction with Go, which was absent in the untransfected controls (Fig. 1C). Aβ treatment was also able to modulate the interaction between C99 and Go, with cells treated with Aβ showing a decreased interaction between C99 and Go in comparison to Aβ-untreated cells (Fig. 1C).

Immunocytochemistry was conducted to verify the distribution of Go protein immunoreactivity in the presence and absence of Aβ (Fig. 2). In the absence of Aβ, Go immunoreactivity colocalizes with APP immunoreactivity in the cytoplasm of APP-transfected B103 cells (Fig. 2G–I). In the presence of Aβ, however, this colocalization is disturbed such that the addition of Aβ appears to reduce APP:Go colocalization/interaction (Fig. 2J–L, compare 2I and 2L).

Figure 2. Colocalization of APP:Go Immunoreactivity in APP- transfected Neuronal Cultures.

Figure 2

Immunoreactivity for Go and APP in untreated control B103 cells (A,B), Aβ-treated B103 cells (D,E) APP-transfected B103 cells (G,H) and Aβ-treated APP transfected B103 cells (J,K) and colocalization of signals in cells under the different conditions (in C, F, I and L respectively). Scale bar = 20µm.

G-protein activation contributes to Aβ-induced cell death in neuronal cultures

In order to investigate whether Aβ-mediated G-protein activation may impact Aβ-induced cell death, B103 cells were transiently transfected with APP695 and treated with Aβ (10µM), the G-protein inhibitor Pertussis Toxin (PTX) (100ng/ml), or a combination of the two for 24hr. PTX prevents the two active components of the G-protein, the α subunit and the βγ fragment, from separating and in so doing prevents the G-protein mechanism from reaching an active state. PTA administration had no effect on levels of APP in transfected or untransfected B103 cells (Fig. 1D)Following treatment, cell death was assessed using the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) assay. Results from the LDH assay demonstrated that the effect of Aβ toxicity on untransfected B103 (which themselves lack APP) cells was minimal, however when Aβ treatment followed transfection with APP695 a significant increase in cell death was observed (Fig. 3A). PTX administration significantly reduced this APP-dependent Aβ-induced cell death (Fig. 3A). These results support the involvement of the G-protein system in APP-dependent Aβ-induced toxicity. The effects of APP and Aβ on neurite outgrowth were also assessed as an additional measure of cell viability (Fig. 3B). The presence of APP had minimal effect on neurite outgrowth in B103 cells, however Aβ treatment of APP- transfected cells resulted in a significant decrease in neurite outgrowth (Fig. 3B) in comparison to Aβ-treated untransfected B103 cells. PTX administration abrogated this reduction in neurite length when given in conjunction with Aβ treatment (Fig 3B).

Figure 3. APP695-dependent Aβ-induced Cell Death Requires G-Protein Activation in Neuronal Cultures.

Figure 3

B103 rat neuroblastoma cells were transiently transfected with APP695 and subsequently treated for 24 hours with vehicle, Aβ (10µM), PTX (100ng/ml) or a combination of Aβ and PTX. Following treatment, cell death was analyzed via the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) cell death assay.

(A) Minimal cell death was observed in B103 cells with or without APP695 transfection, treatment with Aβ significantly increased cell death in APP695 transfected cells (*). Treatment PTX alone had no significant effect upon cell death in cells with or without APP695 transfection, however when administered in combination with Aβ, PTX significantly reduced the cell death associated with Aβ treatment of APP695 transfected cells (**).

* indicates a significant difference between vehicle- and Aβ-treated APP695 transfected cells (p<0.05, by one way ANOVA and post hoc Fisher).

** indicates a significant difference between Aβ/PTX- and Aβ-treated APP695 transfected cells (p<0.05, by one way ANOVA and post hoc Fisher).

(B) Neurite outgrowth was assessed in cells transfected with APP695 and treated with Aβ. There was a significant reduction in neurite length in Aβ-treated APP695-transfected cells which was abrogated upon the addition on PTX.

* indicates a significant difference (p<0.05, by one way ANOVA and post hoc Fisher).

(C) B103 rat neuroblastoma cells were transiently transfected with APP695, APP695ΔY or APP695ΔC31 and subsequently treated for 24 hours with Aβ (10µM). Following treatment, cell death was analyzed via the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) cell death assay.

APP-dependent Aβ-induced cell death was clearly observed in cells transfected with APP695, whilst cells transfected with the APP695ΔY or APP695ΔC31 constructs failed to display significant cell death upon Aβ treatment in comparison to untransfected cells.

* indicates a significant difference between vehicle- and Aβ-treated APP695 transfected cells (p<0.05, by one way ANOVA and post hoc Fisher).

** indicates a significant difference between Aβ-treated APP695 transfected cells and Aβ-treated APP695ΔY and APP695ΔC31 transfected cells (p<0.05, by one way ANOVA and post hoc Fisher).

(D) Neurite outgrowth was assessed in cells transfected with APP695, APP695ΔY or APP695ΔC31 and subsequently treated for 24 hours with Aβ (10µM). There was a significant reduction in neurite length in Aβ-treated APP695-transfected cells which was not evident in cells transfected with the APP695ΔY or APP695ΔC31 constructs

* indicates a significant difference (p<0.05, by one way ANOVA and post hoc Fisher).

Aβ modulation of the interaction of Go:APP requires the C31 domain

It has been previously reported that a crucial event in APP-dependent Aβ-induced toxicity is the caspase cleavage of full length APP inside its cytoplasmic region to release the toxic C31 fragment [4]. The C31 peptide has been shown to cause apoptosis in vitro and has been described in brain samples from AD patients but not in control samples [31].

In order to investigate the identity of APP domains involved in the interaction between Aβ, APP and Go, we examined the importance of the C31 domain and of regions within it. The –YENPTY- region in the C31 fragment was of particular interest as this domain has been previously reported to bind cytoplasmic proteins, including Fe65, X11/Mint1 and Jip-1b [3234]. Most importantly, it has already been demonstrated that the APP-dependent component of Aβ toxicity was abrogated when this domain was deleted from APP [5].

B103 cells were transiently transfected with full length APP (APP695), a construct in which the –YENPTY- region had been deleted (APP695ΔY) or with a construct lacking the complete C31 fragment (APP695ΔC31). As previously, cells were treated with Aβ (10µM, 24hr) and cell homogenates were collected and subjected to immunoprecipitation using the APP G369 antibody and blotted for Go proteins using the monoclonal Go antibody. As previously described (Fig. 1A), cells transfected with APP695 displayed a binding to Go which was absent in untransfected cells, this binding was largely absent in cells that had been treated with Aβ (Fig. 4A). Cells transfected with APP695ΔY or APP695ΔC31 also displayed an interaction with Go, however, unlike the case with full length APP, this binding was not attenuated upon Aβ treatment (Fig. 4A). These findings suggest that the C31 domain is essential for Aβ-responsive modulation of the APP:Go interaction.

Figure 4. Aβ Modulation of the APP:Go Interaction Requires an Intact APP C-terminal Domain.

Figure 4

B103 rat neuroblastoma cells were transiently transfected with full length APP (APP695), APP695 lacking the YENPTY domain (APP695ΔY) or APP695 lacking the C-terminal C31 domain (APP695ΔC31) and subsequently treated with Aβ (10µM, 24hours).

(A) For immunoprecipitation studies cell homogenates were immunoprecipitated with the APP C-terminal specific G369 antibody, run on a SDS-PAGE gel and Go protein binding was assessed by immunoblot with a monoclonal Go antibody. The interaction between APP695 and Go (40kDa) is reduced in cells that have been treated with Aβ. This interaction is present in cells transfected with APP695ΔY and APP695ΔC31 however, in these cells, Aβ failed to reduce the level of interaction observed.

(B) Western blot analysis with G369 antibody demonstrates that treatment with Aβ did not affect the expression levels of APP695, APP695ΔY or APP695ΔC31.

(C) B103 rat neuroblastoma cells were transiently transfected with APP695 and subsequently treated for 24 hours with, vehicle, Aβ (10µM), PTX (100ng/ml), or a combination of Aβ and PTX. Following treatment, levels of intracellular calcium were analyzed using the FLIPR calcium assay.

Aβ-treatment of APP695 transfected cells resulted in a significant increase in intracellular calcium levels as compared to vehicle-treated APP695 transfected cells (*). Treatment PTX alone had no significant effect upon calcium influx in cells with or without APP695 transfection, however when administered in combination with Aβ, PTX significantly reduced the calcium influx associated with Aβ treatment of APP695 transfected cells (**).

* indicates a significant difference between vehicle- and Aβ-treated APP695 transfected cells (p<0.05, by one way ANOVA and post hoc Fisher).

** indicates a significant difference between Aβ/PTX- and Aβ-treated APP695 transfected cells (p<0.05, by one way ANOVA and post hoc Fisher).

(D) B103 rat neuroblastoma cells were transiently transfected with APP695, APP695ΔY or APP695ΔC31 and subsequently treated for 24 hours with Aβ (10µM). Following treatment, intracellular calcium levels were analyzed via FLIRP calcium assay.

APP-dependent Aβ-induced calcium influx was clearly observed in cells transfected with APP695, whilst cells transfected with the APP695ΔY or APP695ΔC31 constructs failed to display significant calcium influx upon Aβ treatment in comparison to APP695 transfected cells.

* indicates a significant difference between vehicle- and Aβ-treated APP695 transfected cells (p<0.05, by one way ANOVA and post hoc Fisher).

** indicates a significant difference between Aβ-treated APP695 transfected cells and Aβ-treated APP695ΔY and APP695ΔC31 transfected cells (p<0.05, by one way ANOVA and post hoc Fisher).

In order to investigate the importance of APP C-terminal domains in APP-dependent Aβ-induced cell death, B103 cells were transfected with the above constructs and treated with Aβ as before. Following treatment, cell death was assessed using the LDH toxicity assay. Consistent with previous results, the presence of full-length APP appeared to promote Aβ-toxicity and cell death (Fig. 3C), however Aβ treatment failed to induce cell death in cells transfected with the APP695ΔC31 or APP695ΔY constructs. Assessment of neurite outgrowth revealed that in Aβ treatment of APP695 transfected B103 cells resulted in a significant reduction in neurite length in comparison to cells transfected with the APP695ΔC31 or APP695ΔY constructs (Fig. 3D) These findings are consistent with previous findings identifying the C31 domain, specifically the –YENPTY- region, as critical for the Aβ- mediated toxicity [4, 5, 29, 35].

APP-dependent Aβ toxicity is mediated by calcium influx following G-protein activation

Calcium influx has previously been shown to increase following Aβ treatment in vitro [36]. This effect was explained by many different mechanisms, including formation of calcium channels in the cell membrane by Aβ itself [36]. In order to ascertain whether the activation of G-proteins led to changes in intracellular calcium levels we conducted a calcium assay to measure intracellular calcium and its modulation by G-protein activation following Aβ treatment.

Cells were transiently transfected with APP695 followed by treatment with Aβ (10µM), PTX (100ng/ml), or a combination of the two for 24hr. Following treatment, cells were applied to a calcium influx assay to measure intracellular calcium levels.

APP695 transfected cells treated with Aβ showed a significantly increased calcium influx in comparison to vehicle-treated APP6595 transfected cells or uninfected cells treated with Aβ (Fig. 4C). PTX administration together with Aβ treatment significantly reduced the Aβ-induced calcium influx in APP-transfected cells (Fig. 4C) highlighting the importance of G-protein activation for APP-dependent Aβ-induced calcium influx.

In order to further explore the contribution of various domains of APP to calcium influx modulation by Aβ, cells were transfected with APP695, APP695ΔY or APP695ΔC31 and treated with Aβ as before, following 24 hour incubation calcium influx into the cells was measured (Fig. 4D). Transfection with APP695ΔY or APP695ΔC31 mutants failed to promote calcium influx into the cell following Aβ treatment compared to cells transfected with APP695 construct (Fig. 4D). These results highlight the importance of the C31 domain, particularly the –YENPTY- region in the ability of APP to invoke G-protein modulated calcium influx.

Caspase cleavage of APP is required for Aβ modulation of APP and Go interaction

It has previously been reported that Aβ-mediated toxicity initiates a cascade of events that includes caspase activation and APP caspase cleavage at residue 664 (APP695 numbering) generates the potentially cytotoxic peptide C31 [4]. This cleavage event is reported to be crucial for APP-mediated Aβ toxicity [4, 5, 29, 35]. In order to investigate the impact of APP caspase cleavage on the interaction between APP and G-proteins we generated a construct of APP695 containing a point mutation within the consensus caspase cleavage site – blocking caspase cleavage at this site (APP695D664A) and the subsequent production of the C31 fragment. This mutation has been shown to significantly reduce Aβ-induced neuronal degeneration and cognitive impairment in transgenic mouse models of AD [29, 37].

B103 cells were transfected with APP695 or APP695D664A and treated with Aβ as in previous experiments, following Aβ treatment cells were homogenized and underwent immunoprecipitation with the anti-APP G369 antibody and blotted with the antibody against Go. As opposed to the results seen with APP695 (Fig. 1 and Fig. 5A), Aβ failed to reduce the interaction between the APP695D664A construct and Go (Fig. 5A). Transfection with APP695 or APP695D664A and Aβ treatment had no effect on total levels of Go or APP (Fig. 5B).

Figure 5. The Interaction Between APP695 and Go Requires APP Caspase Cleavage.

Figure 5

B103 rat neuroblastoma cells were transiently transfected with APP695 or with APP695 with a substitution of alanine for aspartic acid at position 664 (APP695D664A). Cells were subsequently treated with Aβ (10µM, 24hours).

(A) For immunoprecipitation studies cell homogenates were immunoprecipitated with the APP C-terminal specific G369 antibody, run on a SDS-PAGE gel and Go protein binding assessed by immunoblot with a monoclonal Go antibody. The interaction between APP695 and Go (40kDa) is reduced in cells that have been treated with Aβ. This interaction is also present in cells transfected with APP695D664, however Aβ treatment of APP695D664 transfected cells failed to reduce the band signal intensity.

(B) Western blot analysis with the Go antibody demonstrates that transfection with APP695 or APP695D664 and/or treatment with Aβ does not affect expression levels of Go. Similar analysis with the G369 antibody demonstrates that Aβ treatment does not affect expression levels of APP695 or APP695D664.

(C) B103 rat neuroblastoma cells were transiently transfected with APP695 or APP695D664 and subsequently treated for 24 hours with Aβ (10µM) were analyzed via the lactate LDH cell death assay to obtain a measure of APP695-dependent Aβ-induced cell death.

Minimal cell death was observed in B103 cells with or without APP695 transfection, whilst treatment with Aβ significantly increased cell death in APP695 transfected cells (*). Aβ failed to induce significant levels of cell death in cells transfected with APP695D664 (**)

* indicates a significant difference between Aβ-treated APP695 transfected cells and Aβ-treated untransfected cells (p<0.05, by one way ANOVA and post hoc Fisher).

** indicates a significant difference between Aβ-treated APP695D664A transfected cells and Aβ-treated APP695 transfected cells (p<0.05, by one way ANOVA and post hoc Fisher).

(D) Measurements of intracellular calcium demonstrate a significant increase in calcium influx in cells transfected with APP695 upon Aβ-treatment in comparison to Aβ-treated untransfected cells (*). Aβ-treatment of APP695D664A transfected cells failed to elicit a significant increase in intracellular calcium levels in comparison to Aβ-treated untransfected cells (**).

* indicates a significant difference between Aβ-treated APP695 transfected cells and Aβ-treated untransfected cells (p<0.05, by one way ANOVA and post hoc Fisher).

** indicates a significant difference between Aβ-treated APP695D664A transfected cells and Aβ-treated APP695 transfected cells (p<0.05, by one way ANOVA and post hoc Fisher).

LDH and calcium influx assays were also conducted on APP695D664A transfected cells. As with the other mutant APP constructs examined, mutating the caspase cleavage site of APP reduced cell death observed upon Aβ administration (Fig. 5C) and the G-protein activation mediated calcium influx by Aβ into cells (Fig. 5D).

These results are consistent with and complement previous studies reporting that the caspase cleavage of APP is critical for the Aβ-induced cell death pathway [5, 29]

Decreased interaction between APP and Go in human AD brains

Many reports have described disturbances in G-protein signaling in AD post-mortem brains [15], this disruption has been proposed to be caused by an altered coupling of G-proteins to their receptors or by altered levels of G-proteins in regions such as the hippocampus or frontal cortex in AD brains [16, 17].

In order to further investigate G-protein characteristics and APP:Go binding in human tissue, brain samples from AD cases at different pathological stages of AD and age-matched non-demented controls were obtained.

Initial immunoblot characterization of purified membrane fractions (the fraction of the cell homogenate enriched with Aβ, APP and G-proteins) revealed that, as expected, disease progression was accompanied by a decrease in immunoreactivity for the neurodegenerative marker synaptophysin (Fig. 6A). APP protein levels in the membrane remained constant throughout the disease (Fig. 6B) as did total levels of Go (Fig. 6C). As expected, levels of Aβ increased significantly with increasing disease severity (Fig. 6D).

Figure 6. Characterization of AD-related Marker Levels in Human AD Brain Homogenates.

Figure 6

Membrane fractions were obtained from human brains at various Braak stages of AD (I–II n=10, III–IV n=10 and V–VI n=10) and 9 non-demented age-matched control brains (designated Braak stage 0). 10µg of each sample were used for immunoblot analysis of various AD-related proteins. In each case signal intensity was measured (mean ± SEM).

(A) Levels of synaptophysin immunoreactivity show a decrease upon disease progression

(B) Levels of APP immunoreactivity remain stable across the different Braak stages

(C) Levels of GO immunoreactivity remain stable across the different Braak stages

(D) Levels of Aβ immunoreactivity increase as the disease progresses.

* indicates a significant difference between expression levels at Braak stage 0 and Braak stage V–VI (p<0.05, by one way ANOVA and post hoc Fisher).

In order to investigate interactions between APP and G-proteins in human AD brain purified brain membranes from each of the series were immunoprecipitated for APP and recovered for Go. Our results demonstrated a decreasing interaction between APP and Go as the disease progressed (Fig. 7A). The reciprocal immunoprecipitation with the Go antibody and detection with the CT15 antibody revealed identical results, each immunoprecipitation was repeated twice with consistent results each time (data not shown). These results imply that as AD progresses and the pathological load of Aβ increases, the binding between APP and Go becomes increasing impaired, and at later stages of the disease binding may be absent altogether.

Figure 7. The APP:Go Interaction and G-protein activation is Modulated During AD Progression.

Figure 7

(A) Brain samples were homogenized and immunoprecipitated with the APP C-terminal specific CT15 antibody, run on a SDS-PAGE gel and Go protein binding was assessed by immunoblot with a monoclonal Go antibody. Signal intensity of the 40kDa band (corresponding to the interaction between APP and Go) was analyzed for each sample at each Braak stage. A decrease in the signal intensity of the 40kDa band was observed with increasing disease severity (mean ± SEM).

* indicates a significant difference between expression levels at Braak stage 0 and Braak stage V–VI (p<0.05, by one way ANOVA and post hoc Fisher).

(B) In order to assess the activation capability of G-proteins in AD, G-protein activation at different Braak stages was assessed using the classic G-protein activator NE (10µM). Results from this assay demonstrate that G-proteins in purified membrane fractions from human frontal cortex from each Braak stage are equally capable of being activated by NE (10µM).

(C) G-protein activation was assessed at different Braak stages and showed that G-protein activation increases with increasing disease severity.

* indicates a significant difference between activity levels at Braak stages I–II, III–IV and V–VI and Braak stage 0 (p<0.05, by one way ANOVA and post hoc Fisher).

It is possible that the decrease in APP:Go may be a result of global neurodegeneration in the brain and a ubiquitous decrease in protein:protein interactions, however this would not explain the observation that during the disease we demonstrate an increase in Aβ levels (Figure 6D), as this dot blot analysis was performed on membrane fractions, this Aβ is not the free Aβ but it is the Aβ that is bound to APP and extracted with the membrane fractions. Given the increase in APP:Abeta interactions, we believe that the decrease in APP:Go interaction during disease progression is not a mere epiphenomena but rather a specific trigger for G-protein activation.

Increased G-protein activation in human AD brains

In order to determine whether the decreased binding of APP and Go at later stages of AD and the subsequent liberation of Go had any effect on basal G-protein activation levels we induced G-protein activation in membranes purified from the brain samples by norepinephrine (NE, 10µM), a classic G-protein activator [38]. All membrane fractions displayed similar levels of GTP binding (Fig. 7B) indicating that the internal characteristics of G-protein activation remained the same throughout the disease.

Next we sought to investigate G-protein activation levels in AD brains during the progression of the disease. To this end G-protein activation assays were conducted on purified membrane fractions from AD brains at different Braak stages and from non-demented age-matched controls. Results from these assays demonstrated a significant increase in the level of G-protein activation correlating to advancing Braak stage (Fig. 7C), suggesting that G-protein activation levels increased as the disease progressed. As the inherent ‘excitability’ of the G-proteins remained the same in AD and normal samples (Fig. 7B), the only parameter that correlated with the increased activation levels seen in AD was the disease-related increase in Aβ and therefore we propose that the increase in G-protein activation is due to increased levels of Aβ rather than any inherent change in activation mechanisms.

Discussion

Previous studies have shown that calcium dysregulation plays a role in AD and that APP-dependent Aβ toxicity leads to cell death, the present study is the first to link these two processes by demonstrating that calcium dysregulation occurs following G-protein activation resulting from the interaction between Aβ and the C-terminus of APP.

We show that interactions between APP and Go are attenuated upon treatment with Aβ resulting in APP-dependent Aβ-induced cell death, which was significantly abrogated upon treatment with PTX, a G-protein inhibitor. These results highlight the role of the G-protein system in the mechanism underlying APP-dependent Aβ-induced toxicity and are consistent with number of studies suggesting that the activation of G- proteins may mediate APP-dependent Aβ toxicity in AD [3941]. In order to pinpoint specific domains in APP involved in the binding to Go and the responsiveness to Aβ we transfected B103 cells, which themselves lack endogenous APP, with constructs containing full length APP (APP695) or APP lacking either the entire C31 domain (APP695ΔC31) or the C-terminal –YENPTY- region (aa681–687, APP695ΔY). While all constructs are able to bind Go, the presence of the C31 domain, more specifically the –YENPTY- region is necessary for the responsiveness to Aβ. These results are consistent with a recent study investigating the regions of APP important in Go binding which also found that APP binding to Go could be demonstrated in rat hippocampal cells transfected with an APP construct lacking the –YENPTY-region [6] and with studies that have linked the C-terminal fragment of APP to calcium dysregulation [42]. However unlike the study by Sola Vigo et. al. [6] which demonstrated Aβ toxicity in hippocampal cells transfected with the APP construct lacking the –YENPTY-region, we did not observe significant cell death upon Aβ treatment of B103 cells transfected with APP695ΔY (or APP695ΔC31). It is possible that in the aforementioned study, where transfections were conducted into primary cells, enough endogenous APP containing the C31/YENPTY region was present to cause toxicity, whilst in B103s, the lack of endogenous APP meant that the effect of C31 or –YENPTY- deletion was not masked by the presence of endogenous APP, thus the lack of cell toxicity Aβ treatment in these upon cells demonstrated the need for an intact C31/ YENPTY region for APP-dependent Aβ induced cell toxicity. The work by Sola Vigo et. al. [6] also demonstrated a lack of toxicity in rat hippocampal cells transfected with constructs containing the -YENPTY-region (but lacking other regions of the intracellular domain of APP), while this discrepancy is puzzling it may suggest multiple sites on APP involved in G-protein binding, and Aβ-induced cell death.

Our results highlight the importance of the C-terminal region of APP for the interaction between APP and Go as without it, there will be no domain for the G protein to bind to. We indicate that the C31 region, especially, the YENPTY domain is crucial for the release of the Go subunit from the intracellular APP. The site of direct interaction of APP with G protein was previously mapped [7, 21] to the sequence 657–674 (APP695 numbering). We further extended these findings by adding the importance of the YENPTY domain. Though the YENPTY domain is outside of the binding region 657–674 it can still regulate the binding of Go to this region, in this way we combine the data on G protein importance in Aβ-induced cell death with other data such as the importance of the C31 region, specifically the YENPTY area, in Aβ-induced toxicity was illustrated [5, 29, 37]. The mechanism we propose here links the ideas of APP:Aβ extracellular binding leading to APP homodimerization, followed by caspase recruitment and activation to cleave C31 [4]. Once the C31 is cleaved out, the YENPTY region, that is a domain within this C31, is actually cleaved off, thereby regulating the binding of Go to APP, providing a possible way to illustrate how C31 cleavage activates G protein signaling – dependent calcium influx and subsequent cell death.

It is possible that Aβ-induced G-protein activation could be an early step in Aβ toxicity, and that the activation of the G-protein system could produce many of the observed downstream cellular responses to Aβ. A major cellular function of the G-protein system is the regulation of intracellular levels of calcium [10, 23, 24] and number of neuronal functions are highly dependent on calcium signaling, the intensity of which is tightly regulated both temporally and spatially through out the cell [43].

Calcium has itself been linked to AD, with the calcium hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease, first proposed over ten years ago, suggesting that sustained intracellular calcium disturbances may underlie many neurodegenerative disorders, including AD [44]. This theory was supported by studies that demonstrated that alterations in calcium signaling were a feature of both sporadic and familial AD [45, 46]. Subsequent work [47] went on to examine the effect of APP and its cleavage product Aβ on calcium regulation and demonstrated that APP −/− cells displayed a reduced release of ER calcium which could only be rescued upon overexpression of APP fragments containing the intracellular domain of APP (AICD) and not upon expression of fragment lacking the AICD highlighting the importance of this region in the regulation of calcium signaling.

Aβ oligomers have themselves been shown to rapidly elevate intracellular calcium levels in human neuroblastoma cells and to increase membrane permeability and conductance [48, 49]. Aβ aggregates have also been reported to cause calcium release from ER stores both by inositol triphosphate and ryanodine receptors [5052]. Increased intracellular levels of calcium have in turn been proposed to act in a ‘feedback’ manner by several studies which suggest that increased influx of calcium through channels on the plasma membrane or ER may modulate APP processing resulting in an increase in Aβ production [5355]. Consistent with this model, a recent study by Rensede et al (2008) examined the effects of oligomeric Aβ and found that via phospholipase C activation these oligomers depletes ER calium levels leading to intracellular calcium dyshomeostasis. They further show that administration of dantrolene, an inhibitor of ER ryanodine receptors prevented the oligomer-induced apoptosis demonstrating the involvement of ER in Aβ-toxicity induced by calcium dysregulation [56].

Though the increases in intracellular calcium observed in AD are frequently ascribed to calcium entry through calcium channels, there are a number of alternative theories that have been proposed to explain the changes in calcium regulation, one such theory is the formation of cation-selective ion channels by Aβ which has been demonstrated to form calcium pores in artificial membrane systems as well as in living cells [57, 58]. Another channel-independent manner by which Aβ may interfere with intracellular calcium homeostasis is the formation of reactive oxygen species, which in turn may induce membrane lipid peroxidation [59]. The resultant alterations in membrane properties may affect membrane transporter and ion channel function and could in turn lead to elevated intracellular calcium levels [60].

We propose a mechanism, depicted in Figure 8, in which, under normal conditions (Fig. 8A), G-proteins are bound to APP, perhaps at multiple sites, and remain in an inactive condition. Under pathological conditions such as AD (Fig. 8B) when Aβ binds to APP the G-proteins are released, become activated and go on to affect various downstream effectors resulting an increase in intracellular calcium levels, perhaps via regulation receptors on the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and the plasma membrane [1114], which may eventually result in cell death. The dimerization of APP and its caspase cleavage may also be involved. While these results do not preclude multiple G-protein binding sites on APP, they highlight the importance of the –YENPTY- region in APP-dependent Aβ mediated toxicity. Collectively the results from this study bolster previous work that identified an interaction between G-protein activity and Aβ-induced toxicity and provide the first demonstration that this toxicity is clinically relevant and related to G-protein activation-dependent calcium dysregulation. Our data suggest a direct interaction between APP and Go, as has been previously demonstrated [7], however it does not exclude the possibility that APP and Go may be members of a complex, though the identity of these complex members (if any) remains to be determined. Our model is also consistent with studies of G-protein signaling that report a dissociation of G-protein heterotrimers following activation [6163].

Figure 8. Aβ-mediated G-protein Activation Dependent Calcium Influx - Proposed Mechanism.

Figure 8

APP binding to Go under basal conditions (A) allows to the G-protein to remain in ans inactive state. Increasing levels of Aβ, such as those found in AD (B), disrupt APP:Go binding, this Aβ-responsiveness requires an intact C31/-YENPTY- region. The Go is liberated and goes on to achieve an active conformation and activate downstream pathways including the influx of calcium from ER stores or from the extracellular space. Elevated levels of intracellular calcium lead to eventual cell death.

In addition to providing the first evidence linking APP-dependent Aβ-induced cell toxicity to the well-documented calcium dysregulation observed in AD, the results presented here suggest a mechanism underlying APP-dependent Aβ-toxicity whereby basal APP binding to Go is reduced under pathological loads of Aβ thus liberating Go and activating the G-protein system which in turn may result in calcium dysregulation. These results also suggest that specific antagonists of G-protein activity may have a therapeutic relevance in AD.

Materials and Methods

Human Brain Samples

For the present study a total of 39 aged human brains (frontal cortex) from the Alzheimer’s Disease Research Centre at the University of California, San Diego were used. Samples were obtained from patients at various stages of AD (Braak stage I–II, n=10, Braak stage III–IV n=10, and Braak stage V–VI n=10) and from non-demented age-matched controls (these were designated as Braak stage 0, n=9). Table 1 describes the demographic characteristics and AD categorization of patient samples used in this study. All cases were extensively clinically characterized during life and histopathologically post mortem. Cases with a history of trauma, hemorrhage or infarction were excluded from the study. Post mortem examination was conducted within 8 hours and patients used in this study died of acute bronchopneumonia, myocardial infarction or sepsis.

Table 1.

Demographic Information of Human Samples

Diagnosis Braak Stage
Range
N Age


mean (+/− SEM)
Sex


F/M
MMSE1


mean (±SEM)
Plaques
Frontal Cortex
(per 0.1sq
mm)

mean (±SEM)
Tangles
Frontal
Cortex (per
0.1sq mm)

mean (±SEM)
Brain Weight
(g)

mean (±SEM)
Undemented
Control
0 9 73.0 (±7.10) 4/5 27.9 (±1.23) 1.1 (±0.56) 0 (±0.0) 993.6 (±153.60)
Mild AD I–II 10 88.7 (±1.66) 7/3 25.3 (±2.11) 22.1 (±4.41) 0 (±0.0) 1016.9 (±132.23)
Moderate AD III–IV 10 89.6 (±1.86) 5/5 15.6 (±2.38) 38.9 (±4.95) 0.2 (±1.33) 941.6 (±118.90)
Advanced AD V–VI 10 79.3 (±2.54) 5/5 9.11 (±2.33) 44.2 (±3.63) 3.3 (±1.24) 1087.2 (±53.90)
1

Mini Mental State Examination

Preparation of Human Membrane Samples

Membranes were prepared as previously described [25]. Briefly, human frontal cortex samples were homogenized in 10vol of homogenizing buffer (5 mM HEPES [pH 8.0], 0.32 M sucrose, 5 mM benzamidine, 2 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 3 mM EGTA, 0.5 mM MgSO4, 0.05% NaN3) containing protease inhibitors (10 ug/ml leupeptin, 5 ug/ml pepstatin A, 5 ug/ml aprotinin, 10 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) and phosphatase inhibitors (10 mM sodium orthovanadate, 2 mM KF, 1 pM okadaic acid) using a Teflon/glass homogenizer at 4°C. Homogenized samples were centrifuged at 100 000g for 1 hr at 4°C. The supernatant was used as the cytosolic fraction, and the pellet, rehomogenized in the original volume of homogenizing buffer, was used as the membrane (particulate) fraction. The membrane fraction was subsequently used for G-protein activation assays and western blot analysis.

GTP Activation Assays

The DELFIA GTP-binding kit (Perkin Elmer) was used according to manufacturer’s instructions. This assay is based on time resolved fluorescence (TRF) and is intended for the measurement of G-protein coupled receptor activation (GPCR) by the use of Europium tagged guanine-triphosphate GTP. Stimulation of the GPCR by agonists leads to exchange of guanine-diphosphate (GDP) for GTP on the α subunit of the G-protein. The Europium tagged GTP is non-hydrolyzable and so remains attached to the Gα subunit allowing the monitoring of the agonist dependent activation of G-proteins.

Antibodies

The following antibodies were used in this study: G369 (C-terminal APP-specific, kindly by Sam Gandy); CT15 (C-terminal APP-specific, kindly donated by Ed Koo), Anti Go (Rabbit polyclonal, Upstate, NY), Anti-Synaptophysin (mouse monoclonal antibody, Chemicon International), Anti-Aβ antibody (6E10, mouse monoclonal, Covance, Princeton, NJ) and Anti-β-actin (Rabbit polyclonal, Sigma).

Western Blot Analysis

Neuronal cell homogenates, obtained as previously described [26] and membrane fractions of human brain samples were analyzed by immunoblot. Twenty micrograms of total protein per sample were loaded onto 10% Bis-Tris (Invitrogen) SDS-PAGE gels, transferred onto Immobilon membranes, incubated overnight with primary antibodies. After incubation with primary antibodies, membranes were incubated in appropriate secondary antibodies, reacted with ECL, and developed on a VersaDoc gel-imaging machine (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Anti-β-actin (1:1000) was used to confirm equal loading.

Immunoprecipitation Studies

Human brains (frontal cortex) or harvested cells were homogenized as previously described [27]. Briefly, cells or brain homogenates were lysed in Buffer A (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA, 100 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 0.5% Sodium Cholate, 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride, 1 mg/ml trypsin inhibitor). Lysates were centrifuged at 4°C at 100 000g for 20min, supernatant fractions were used for immunoprecipitation.

Homogenates were immunoprecipitated by using an APP polyclonal antibody (G369 or CT15) and added to 20 µl slurry of protein A/G beads (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Following an overnight incubation at 4°c the beads were washed 3 times with lysis buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA, 100 mM NaCl, 0.2 mM PMSF, and 1mg/ml trypsin inhibitor. Proteins were eluted by boiling in 25 µl of loading buffer and resolved by SDS-PAGE on a 4–12% Bis-Tris gel. Following electrotransfer to nitrocellulose membrane (Millipore), Go was recovered by incubation with the anti-Go antibody, followed by incubation with the appropriate secondary antibody. Proteins were visualized by enhanced chemilluminescence and analyzed with a Versadoc XL imaging apparatus (Bio-Rad). Densitometrical analysis of immunological signals was performed using the Quantity One software (Bio-Rad).

Neuronal Cell Culture and APP Transfection

B103 rat neuroblastoma cells were routinely maintained in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM), supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum and 5% horse serum in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2/95% O2. B103 cells were chosen for this study as they have previously been shown to lack endogenous APP and to become sensitive to Aβ toxicity upon APP transfection [28].

In order to investigate interactions between APP, Aβ and Go B103 cells were transiently transfected using the Amaxa transfection system (Amaxa, GmbH) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were transfected with full-length wild-type human APP695 or mutant forms of APP. Mutant forms of APP were generated on human APP695 and were constructed in expression plasmid pcDNA3.1 (Invitrogen). These mutants included deletion of the entire C31 domain (aa664–695 to give construct APP695ΔC31), deletion of the –YENPTY- sequence (aa681–687 to give construct APP695ΔY) as well as a point mutation D664A where the aspartic acid at position 664 was replaced for alanine in order to block APP caspase cleavage (APP695D664A) [29]. Transfection efficiency was determined by parallel transfection with a GFP-tagged construct and was consistently determined at ~70% (data not shown). Control cultures were transfected with identical amounts of the corresponding empty vectors. Cells were transfected and left for 24 hours before treatment for a further 24hours with Aβ.

Preparation of Aβ

For Aβ toxicity study, cells were treated with 10 µm Aβ1–42 (American Peptide, USA). Aβ was prepared previously described [5]. In short, the peptide was dissolved in HCl 10mM, and subsequently lyophilized. The peptide was dissolved in DMSO and added immediately to cell culture medium to give final 10µM concentration (at DMSO final conc. 0.5%). This freshly solubilized Aβ preparation yielded primarily monomeric and oligomeric Aβ species (Supplementary Fig.S1) [4].

Analysis of Calcium Levels - FLIPR assay

In order to evaluate whether the toxic effect of Aβ was calcium-dependent, B103 cells were treated for 24 hours with Aβ, after 24 hours cells were stained for the FLIPR4 (fluorescent imaging plate reader) calcium assay according to manufacturer’s instructions (FLIPR, Molecular Devices, CA, USA). Briefly, cells were grown in black 96 well plates (5×104 cells/well) with a clear bottom (Costar 3904, Corning, NY). Before loading the fluo-4 dye (supplied in FLIPR kit, Molecular Devices, CA, USA), the media was replaced for serum-free Hanks Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS). Cells were added with equal volume of loading buffer and incubated for 1 h at 37°C, 5% CO2 in the presence of probenecid (2mM). The plate was then loaded into a DTX 880 multimode detector (Beckman Coulter). The cells were excited at 485 nm and fluorescence emission determined at 535 nm (Integration time 0.4). Experiments were performed in triplicate and values are means ± SD of three experiments for relative fluorescence units (RFU).

Assays of Cell Viability and Neurite Outgrowth

The lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release assay (CytoTox 96 assay, Promega) was performed to measure levels of cell death. Levels of released LDH are inversely proportional to an intact mitochondrial membrane potential and proportional to total protein released from cells providing an accurate index of membrane integrity and cytotoxicity. Briefly, cells were grown in 96-well plates. Following treatment with Aβ culture medium was collected and used to determine viability according to a colorimetric methodology. Measurements were performed with a DTX 880 plate reader as absorbance at 490 nm. All assays were performed in triplicate.

In addition, neurite outgrowth was evaluated as previously described [30]. For this purpose, averages of 10 images per condition of neuronal cells in culture were captured for subsequent analysis with the IMAGEPRO Plus program (Media Cybernetic, Silver Spring, MO, USA). A neurite was defined as a cellular process longer than the diameter of one cell body. Neurite length was analyzed in at least 100 cells for each experimental group.

Statistical Methods

Differences between groups were tested using one and two factor ANOVA with Fisher PLSD posthoc tests. Additional preliminary analysis between control and treated groups was by unpaired, two-tailed, Student’s t-test. All the results are expressed as mean +/− SEM.

Supplementary Material

Sup Fig S1

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by NIH grants AG 5131, AG 18440 and AG 022040

References

  • 1.Dickson DW. Neuropathology of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias. Clin Geriatr Med. 2001;17:209–228. doi: 10.1016/s0749-0690(05)70066-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mehta PD. Amyloid beta protein as a marker or risk factor of Alzheimer's disease. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2007;4:359–363. doi: 10.2174/156720507781788891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lorenzo A, Yuan M, Zhang Z, Paganetti PA, Sturchler-Pierrat C, Staufenbiel M, Mautino J, Vigo FS, Sommer B, Yankner BA. Amyloid beta interacts with the amyloid precursor protein: a potential toxic mechanism in Alzheimer's disease. Nat Neurosci. 2000;3:460–464. doi: 10.1038/74833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lu DC, Soriano S, Bredesen DE, Koo EH. Caspase cleavage of the amyloid precursor protein modulates amyloid beta-protein toxicity. J Neurochem. 2003;87:733–741. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2003.02059.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Shaked GM, Kummer MP, Lu DC, Galvan V, Bredesen DE, Koo EH. Abeta induces cell death by direct interaction with its cognate extracellular domain on APP (APP 597–624) FASEB J. 2006;20:1254–1256. doi: 10.1096/fj.05-5032fje. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sola Vigo F, Kedikian G, Heredia L, Heredia F, Anel AD, Rosa AL, Lorenzo A. Amyloid-beta precursor protein mediates neuronal toxicity of amyloid beta through Go protein activation. Neurobiol Aging. 2008 doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.11.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nishimoto I, Okamoto T, Matsuura Y, Takahashi S, Murayama Y, Ogata E. Alzheimer amyloid protein precursor complexes with brain GTP-binding protein G(o) Nature. 1993;362:75–79. doi: 10.1038/362075a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Swanson TL, Knittel LM, Coate TM, Farley SM, Snyder MA, Copenhaver PF. The insect homologue of the amyloid precursor protein interacts with the heterotrimeric G protein Go alpha in an identified population of migratory neurons. Dev Biol. 2005;288:160–178. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.09.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Birnbaumer L. G proteins in signal transduction. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1990;30:675–705. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pa.30.040190.003331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Felix R. Molecular regulation of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels. J Recept Signal Transduct Res. 2005;25:57–71. doi: 10.1081/rrs-200068102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hille B. G protein-coupled mechanisms and nervous signaling. Neuron. 1992;9:187–195. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(92)90158-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hille B. Modulation of ion-channel function by G-protein-coupled receptors. Trends Neurosci. 1994;17:531–536. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(94)90157-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Herlitze S, Zhong H, Scheuer T, Catterall WA. Allosteric modulation of Ca2+ channels by G proteins, voltage-dependent facilitation, protein kinase C, and Ca(v)beta subunits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:4699–4704. doi: 10.1073/pnas.051628998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Weiss N, De Waard M. Introducing an alternative biophysical method to analyze direct G protein regulation of voltage-dependent calcium channels. J Neurosci Methods. 2006 doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Garcia-Jimenez A, Cowburn RF, Ohm TG, Lasn H, Winblad B, Bogdanovic N, Fastbom J. Loss of stimulatory effect of guanosine triphosphate on [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding correlates with Alzheimer's disease neurofibrillary pathology in entorhinal cortex and CA1 hippocampal subfield. J Neurosci Res. 2002;67:388–398. doi: 10.1002/jnr.10125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cowburn RF, O'Neill C, Bonkale WL, Ohm TG, Fastbom J. Receptor-G-protein signalling in Alzheimer's disease. Biochem Soc Symp. 2001:163–175. doi: 10.1042/bss0670163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.O'Neill C, Wiehager B, Fowler CJ, Ravid R, Winblad B, Cowburn RF. Regionally selective alterations in G protein subunit levels in the Alzheimer's disease brain. Brain Res. 1994;636:193–201. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(94)91017-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.O'Neill C, Cowburn RF, Bonkale WL, Ohm TG, Fastbom J, Carmody M, Kelliher M. Dysfunctional intracellular calcium homoeostasis: a central cause of neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease. Biochem Soc Symp. 2001:177–194. doi: 10.1042/bss0670177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Green KN, Smith IF, Laferla FM. Role of calcium in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease and transgenic models. Subcell Biochem. 2007;45:507–521. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6191-2_19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bojarski L, Herms J, Kuznicki J. Calcium dysregulation in Alzheimer's disease. Neurochem Int. 2008;52:621–633. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2007.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Brouillet E, Trembleau A, Galanaud D, Volovitch M, Bouillot C, Valenza C, Prochiantz A, Allinquant B. The amyloid precursor protein interacts with Go heterotrimeric protein within a cell compartment specialized in signal transduction. J Neurosci. 1999;19:1717–1727. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-05-01717.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rymer DL, Good TA. The role of G protein activation in the toxicity of amyloidogenic Abeta-(1–40), Abeta-(25–35), and bovine calcitonin. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:2523–2530. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M005800200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hescheler J, Rosenthal W, Trautwein W, Schultz G. The GTP-binding protein, Go, regulates neuronal calcium channels. Nature. 1987;325:445–447. doi: 10.1038/325445a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Schultz G, Rosenthal W, Hescheler J, Trautwein W. Role of G proteins in calcium channel modulation. Annu Rev Physiol. 1990;52:275–292. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.52.030190.001423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Iwai A, Masliah E, Yoshimoto M, Ge N, Flanagan L, de Silva HA, Kittel A, Saitoh T. The precursor protein of non-A beta component of Alzheimer's disease amyloid is a presynaptic protein of the central nervous system. Neuron. 1995;14:467–475. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(95)90302-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rockenstein E, Torrance M, Mante M, Adame A, Paulino A, Rose JB, Crews L, Moessler H, Masliah E. Cerebrolysin decreases amyloid-beta production by regulating amyloid protein precursor maturation in a transgenic model of Alzheimer's disease. J Neurosci Res. 2006;83:1252–1261. doi: 10.1002/jnr.20818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ueda H, Morishita R, Katoh-Semba R, Kato K, Asano T. G protein gamma subunits coimmunoprecipitated with antibodies against alpha subunits: identification of major isoforms in cultured cells by silver stain and immunoblotting with conventional transfer procedure. J Biochem. 1998;124:1033–1037. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a022196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Xu X, Yang D, Wyss-Coray T, Yan J, Gan L, Sun Y, Mucke L. Wild-type but not Alzheimer-mutant amyloid precursor protein confers resistance against p53-mediated apoptosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:7547–7552. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.13.7547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Galvan V, Gorostiza OF, Banwait S, Ataie M, Logvinova AV, Sitaraman S, Carlson E, Sagi SA, Chevallier N, Jin K, Greenberg DA, Bredesen DE. Reversal of Alzheimer's-like pathology and behavior in human APP transgenic mice by mutation of Asp664. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:7130–7135. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509695103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Takenouchi T, Hashimoto M, Hsu LJ, Mackowski B, Rockenstein E, Mallory M, Masliah E. Reduced neuritic outgrowth and cell adhesion in neuronal cells transfected with human alpha-synuclein. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2001;17:141–150. doi: 10.1006/mcne.2000.0923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhao M, Su J, Head E, Cotman CW. Accumulation of caspase cleaved amyloid precursor protein represents an early neurodegenerative event in aging and in Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2003;14:391–403. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2003.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Borg JP, Ooi J, Levy E, Margolis B. The phosphotyrosine interaction domains of X11 and FE65 bind to distinct sites on the YENPTY motif of amyloid precursor protein. Mol Cell Biol. 1996;16:6229–6241. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.11.6229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kim HS, Kim EM, Lee JP, Park CH, Kim S, Seo JH, Chang KA, Yu E, Jeong SJ, Chong YH, Suh YH. C-terminal fragments of amyloid precursor protein exert neurotoxicity by inducing glycogen synthase kinase-3beta expression. FASEB J. 2003;17:1951–1953. doi: 10.1096/fj.03-0106fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Matsuda S, Yasukawa T, Homma Y, Ito Y, Niikura T, Hiraki T, Hirai S, Ohno S, Kita Y, Kawasumi M, Kouyama K, Yamamoto T, Kyriakis JM, Nishimoto I. c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK)-interacting protein-1b/islet-brain-1 scaffolds Alzheimer's amyloid precursor protein with JNK. J Neurosci. 2001;21:6597–6607. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-17-06597.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bredesen DE, Rabizadeh S. APP-based neuroprotective strategies. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2007;4:541–543. doi: 10.2174/156720507783018253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Arispe N, Pollard HB, Rojas E. beta-Amyloid Ca(2+)-channel hypothesis for neuronal death in Alzheimer disease. Mol Cell Biochem. 1994;140:119–125. doi: 10.1007/BF00926750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Saganich MJ, Schroeder BE, Galvan V, Bredesen DE, Koo EH, Heinemann SF. Deficits in synaptic transmission and learning in amyloid precursor protein (APP) transgenic mice require C-terminal cleavage of APP. J Neurosci. 2006;26:13428–13436. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4180-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Jansson CC, Kukkonen JP, Nasman J, Huifang G, Wurster S, Virtanen R, Savola JM, Cockcroft V, Akerman KE. Protean agonism at alpha2A-adrenoceptors. Molv Pharmacol. 1998;53:963–968. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lumbreras M, Baamonde C, Martinez-Cue C, Lubec G, Cairns N, Salles J, Dierssen M, Florez J. Brain G protein-dependent signaling pathways in Down syndrome and Alzheimer's disease. Amino Acids. 2006;31:449–456. doi: 10.1007/s00726-005-0272-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Obrenovich ME, Smith MA, Siedlak SL, Chen SG, de la Torre JC, Perry G, Aliev G. Overexpression of GRK2 in Alzheimer disease and in a chronic hypoperfusion rat model is an early marker of brain mitochondrial lesions. Neurotox Res. 2006;10:43–56. doi: 10.1007/BF03033333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Reis K, Zharkovsky A, Bogdanovic N, Karelson E, Land T. Critical role of methionine-722 in the stimulation of human brain G-proteins and neurotoxicity induced by London familial Alzheimer's disease (FAD) mutated V717G-APP(714–723) Neuroscience. 2007;144:571–578. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kim HS, Park CH, Cha SH, Lee JH, Lee S, Kim Y, Rah JC, Jeong SJ, Suh YH. Carboxyl-terminal fragment of Alzheimer's APP destabilizes calcium homeostasis and renders neuronal cells vulnerable to excitotoxicity. FASEB J. 2000;14:1508–1517. doi: 10.1096/fj.14.11.1508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Stutzmann GE. Calcium dysregulation, IP3 signaling, and Alzheimer's disease. Neuroscientist. 2005;11:110–115. doi: 10.1177/1073858404270899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Khachaturian ZS. Calcium hypothesis of Alzheimer's disease and brain aging. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1994;747:1–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1994.tb44398.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Etcheberrigaray R, Hirashima N, Nee L, Prince J, Govoni S, Racchi M, Tanzi RE, Alkon DL. Calcium responses in fibroblasts from asymptomatic members of Alzheimer's disease families. Neurobiol Dis. 1998;5:37–45. doi: 10.1006/nbdi.1998.0176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ito E, Oka K, Etcheberrigaray R, Nelson TJ, McPhie DL, Tofel-Grehl B, Gibson GE, Alkon DL. Internal Ca2+ mobilization is altered in fibroblasts from patients with Alzheimer disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91:534–538. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.2.534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Leissring MA, Murphy MP, Mead TR, Akbari Y, Sugarman MC, Jannatipour M, Anliker B, Muller U, Saftig P, De Strooper B, Wolfe MS, Golde TE, LaFerla FM. A physiologic signaling role for the gamma -secretase-derived intracellular fragment of APP. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:4697–4702. doi: 10.1073/pnas.072033799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Demuro A, Mina E, Kayed R, Milton SC, Parker I, Glabe CG. Calcium dysregulation and membrane disruption as a ubiquitous neurotoxic mechanism of soluble amyloid oligomers. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:17294–17300. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M500997200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Sokolov Y, Kozak JA, Kayed R, Chanturiya A, Glabe C, Hall JE. Soluble amyloid oligomers increase bilayer conductance by altering dielectric structure. J Gen Physiol. 2006;128:637–647. doi: 10.1085/jgp.200609533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Goodman Y, Mattson MP. Secreted forms of beta-amyloid precursor protein protect hippocampal neurons against amyloid beta-peptide-induced oxidative injury. Exp Neurol. 1994;128:1–12. doi: 10.1006/exnr.1994.1107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Mattson MP, Barger SW, Cheng B, Lieberburg I, Smith-Swintosky VL, Rydel RE. beta-Amyloid precursor protein metabolites and loss of neuronal Ca2+ homeostasis in Alzheimer's disease. Trends Neurosci. 1993;16:409–414. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(93)90009-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Mattson MP, Cheng B, Davis D, Bryant K, Lieberburg I, Rydel RE. beta-Amyloid peptides destabilize calcium homeostasis and render human cortical neurons vulnerable to excitotoxicity. J Neurosci. 1992;12:376–389. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-02-00376.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Pierrot N, Ghisdal P, Caumont AS, Octave JN. Intraneuronal amyloid-beta1–42 production triggered by sustained increase of cytosolic calcium concentration induces neuronal death. J Neurochem. 2004;88:1140–1150. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2003.02227.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Pierrot N, Santos SF, Feyt C, Morel M, Brion JP, Octave JN. Calcium-mediated transient phosphorylation of tau and amyloid precursor protein followed by intraneuronal amyloid-beta accumulation. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:39907–39914. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M606015200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Querfurth HW, Selkoe DJ. Calcium ionophore increases amyloid beta peptide production by cultured cells. Biochemistry. 1994;33:4550–4561. doi: 10.1021/bi00181a016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Resende R, Ferreiro E, Pereira C, Resende de Oliveira C. Neurotoxic effect of oligomeric and fibrillar species of amyloid-beta peptide 1–42: involvement of endoplasmic reticulum calcium release in oligomer-induced cell death. Neuroscience. 2008;155:725–737. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.06.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Arispe N, Pollard HB, Rojas E. Giant multilevel cation channels formed by Alzheimer disease amyloid beta-protein [A beta P-(1–40)] in bilayer membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:10573–10577. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.22.10573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kagan BL, Azimov R, Azimova R. Amyloid peptide channels. J Membr Biol. 2004;202:1–10. doi: 10.1007/s00232-004-0709-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Hensley K, Carney JM, Mattson MP, Aksenova M, Harris M, Wu JF, Floyd RA, Butterfield DA. A model for beta-amyloid aggregation and neurotoxicity based on free radical generation by the peptide: relevance to Alzheimer disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91:3270–3274. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.8.3270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Keller JN, Germeyer A, Begley JG, Mattson MP. 17Beta-estradiol attenuates oxidative impairment of synaptic Na+/K+-ATPase activity, glucose transport, and glutamate transport induced by amyloid beta-peptide and iron. J Neurosci Res. 1997;50:522–530. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4547(19971115)50:4<522::AID-JNR3>3.0.CO;2-G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Digby GJ, Lober RM, Sethi PR, Lambert NA. Some G protein heterotrimers physically dissociate in living cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:17789–17794. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0607116103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Digby GJ, Sethi PR, Lambert NA. Differential dissociation of G protein heterotrimers. J Physiol. 2008;586:3325–3335. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2008.153965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Abdulaev NG, Ngo T, Zhang C, Dinh A, Brabazon DM, Ridge KD, Marino JP. Heterotrimeric G-protein alpha-subunit adopts a "preactivated" conformation when associated with betagamma-subunits. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:38071–38080. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M505259200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Sup Fig S1

RESOURCES