Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009 Dec 2;16(4):543–547. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.11.021

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant for Prolymphocytic Leukemia

Matt E Kalaycio 1, Manisha Kukreja 2, Ann E Woolfrey 3, Jeffrey Szer 4, Jorge Cortes 5, Richard T Maziarz 6, Brian J Bolwell 1, Andreas Buser 7, Edward Copelan 1, Robert Peter Gale 8, Vikas Gupta 9, Dipnarine Maharaj 10, David I Marks 11, Steven Z Pavletic 12, Mary M Horowitz 2, Mukta Arora 13
PMCID: PMC2839005  NIHMSID: NIHMS162699  PMID: 19961946

Abstract

The poor prognosis of patients with prolymphocytic leukemia (PLL) has led some clinicians to recommend allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). However, the data to support this approach is limited to case-reports and small case-series. We reviewed the database of the Center for International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research to determine outcomes after allotransplant for patients with PLL. We identified 47 patients with a median age of 54 years (range, 30–75). With a median follow-up of 13 months, progression-free survival was 33% (95% Confidence Interval 20–47%) at 2 years. The most common cause of death was relapse or progression in 49%. The cumulative incidence of treatment-related mortality at 1-year post transplant was 28%. The small patient population prohibited prognostic factor analysis but these data support consideration of allotransplant for PLL. Further study of a larger population of patients is needed to determine which patients are more likely to benefit.

Keywords: Prolymphocytic Leukemia, allogeneic stem cell transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Prolymphocytic leukemia (PLL) actually comprises two rare lymphoproliferative disorders:(1) 1) T-cell PLL (T-PLL) and 2) B-cell PLL (B-PLL). T-PLL expresses CD2, CD3, and CD 7 but not TdT or CD1a.(2) A specific cytogenetic abnormality, inv(14)(q11q32) or t(14;14)(q11q32) that results in a rearrangement of elements of the TCRAD locus with the oncogenes located within the TCL1 locus, occurs in most cases of T-PLL.(35) B-PLL has an immune phenotype similar to chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL); the cells express the pan-B antigens CD19, CD20, and CD22, but not CD5.(6)

PLL has a poor prognosis with standard therapies. Purine analogs are reasonably active and induce remission in about 50% of patients. Unfortunately, 90% of these responses are partial and the median duration of response is less than 1 year.(2, 711)

Monoclonal antibodies are active in PLL. Alemtuzumab induces remission in about 75% of patients with advanced T-PLL,(12) but the median response duration is less than 1 year.(13) Better results are achieved when alemtuzumab is given as initial therapy; nearly all patients respond and some remain in remission for years.(14) There is less experience with rituximab in B-PLL, with anecdotal reports of durable responses.(15)

Because of the poor prognosis with standard treatments, hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) has been explored as therapy for advanced PLL. The largest published series included 11 patients with T-PLL treated with auto- or allotransplants. 3 of the 4 patients receiving allotransplant were alive up to 24 months following transplant.(12) Case reports also suggest the potential efficacy of allotransplants for PLL.(16-19) However, the efficacy of this approach remains uncertain. We, therefore, reviewed the databases of the Center for International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) to determine outcomes of allotransplants for PLL.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data sources

A formal affiliation of the research division of the NMDP, the International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry and the Autologous Blood and Marrow Transplant Registry led to establishment of the CIBMTR in 2004. The CIBMTR is a voluntary working group of more than 450 transplant centers worldwide that contribute detailed data on consecutive allogeneic HCTs to the Statistical Center at the Medical College of Wisconsin in Milwaukee or the National Marrow Donor Program Coordinating Center in Minneapolis. Approximately two-thirds of all active transplantation centers worldwide report data to the registry. The registry database includes information on 40–45% of all patients who have received an allotransplant since 1970, with annual updates. The CIBMTR collects data at two levels: Registration and Research. Registration data include disease type, age, sex, pre-transplant performance status, disease stage and chemotherapy-responsiveness, date of diagnosis, donor and graft type (bone marrow- and/or blood-derived stem cells), high-dose conditioning regimen, post-transplant engraftment, disease recurrence and survival, development of a new malignancy and cause of death. Requests for data on disease recurrence or death for registered patients are at six-month intervals. All CIBMTR centers contribute registration data on all patients. Research data are collected on subsets of registered patients selected using a weighted randomization scheme, including comprehensive pre- and post-transplant clinical information. Compliance is assessed by periodic audits and accuracy of data is ensured by computerized record checks, physician review of submitted data and on-site audits. Observational studies conducted by the CIBMTR are done with a waiver of informed consent and in compliance with HIPAA regulations as determined by the Institutional Review Board and Privacy Officer of Medical College of Wisconsin.

Patients

For the purposes of this analysis, the CIBMTR databases were queried for all patients with PLL treated by allogeneic HCT from 1995 through 2005. The diagnosis of PLL was made at the treatment center and there was no central review of histologic or immunophenotypic data.

Statistical analysis

Patient-, disease- and transplant- related factors were described. The product-limit estimator proposed by Kaplan-Meier was used to estimate the median and range of the follow-up time. Progression free survival is defined as survival without relapse, progression or persistent disease. Treatment failure events are disease relapse, progression or persistent disease or death and are summarized by a survival curve. Time to event is measured from the date of transplant. Probabilities of overall survival and progression-free survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator, with the variance estimated by Greenwood’s formula. Patients were censored at date of last known follow-up. Cumulative incidence estimates were calculated for other endpoints to account for competing risks.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

47 patients with PLL received allotransplants at 29 centers (Table 1). Most donors (77%) were matched unrelated persons. 23 patient-unrelated donor pairs (64%) HLA matched at 8 out of 8 loci by high or low resolution typing at HLA-A, -B, and DRB1 were considered “well-matched.”20 12 patient –unrelated donor pairs were partially matched or mismatched and 1 pair was unknown. The median follow-up for all patients from the time of allotransplant was 13 months (range 6–81).

Table 1.

Characteristics of all the patients who underwent allotransplant for Prolymphocytic leukemia and reported to the CIBMTR, from 1995 to 2006

Variable N eval N (%)
Patient-related
Number of patients 47
Number of centers 29
Age, median (range), years 47 54 (30–75)
Age at transplant, years 47
 31–40 4 (9)
 41–50 11 (23)
 >50 32 (68)
Male sex 47 31 (66)
Race white 47 41 (87)
Karnofsky score at transplant 40
 ≤80% 10 (25)
 > 80% 30 (75)
Disease-related
Interval from diagnosis to transplant (months) 47 11 (2–78)
Immunophenotype 47
 B cell PLL 11 (23)
 T cell PLL 21 (45)
 PLL (Type unknown, confirmed with centers) 15 (32)
Splenectomy 46
 Yes 6 (13)
 No 40 (87)
Disease stage at HCT 45
 Complete remission 16 (36)
 Partial remission 8 (18)
 Refractory 21 (46)
Transplant-related
Donor/recipient gender match 47
 M-M 22 (47)
 M-F 12 (26)
 F-M 9 (19)
 F-F 4 (9)
Donor 47
 HLA-identical sibling 11 (23)
 Unrelated 36 (77)
Donor-recipient HLA match**** 47
 Matched sibling 11 (24)
 Well matched 23 (49)
 Mismatched 12 (25)
 Unknown 1 (2)
Donor-recipient CMV status 45
 +/+ 11 (24)
 +/− 3 (7)
 −/+ 15 (33)
 −/− 16 (36)
Conditioning regimen 47
 ≥9 mg/kg busulfan or > 500 cGy radiation (Myeloablative) 19 (40)
 <9 mg/kg busulfan or < 500 cGy radiation (Reduced Intensity) 14 (30)
 Neither (Melphalan or Fludarabine based regimens) 14 (30)
Graft type 47
 Bone Marrow 15 (32)
 Peripheral Blood Progenitor Cells 31 (66)
 Umbilical Cord Blood 1 (2)
Year of transplant 47
 1995–1996 3 (6)
 1997–1998 2 (4)
 1999–2000 9 (19)
 2001–2002 5 (11)
 2003–2004 12 (26)
 2005–2006 16 (34)
GVHD prophylaxis 47
 MTX+CsA ± others 18 (38)
 FK506+MTX ± others 9 (19)
 CsA ± others 8 (17)
 FK506 ± others 10 (21)
 T-cell depletion 2 (4)
Median follow-up of survivors, months 14 13 (6–81)

Abbreviations: PLL= prolymphocytic leukemia; GVHD = graft versus host disease; MTX = methotrexate; CsA = cyclosporine; FK506 = tacrolimus

****

Well matched was defined as no known disparity at HLA A,B,C,DRB1, partially matched as one locus known or likely disparity with their donors and mismatched as ≥2 locus disparity.

Grade 2–4 acute graft versus host disease (GVHD) developed in 52% (95% confidence interval (CI) 38–66%) of transplant recipients. The 1-year incidence of chronic GVHD was 42% (CI 28–57%). The cumulative incidence of treatment-related mortality at 1-year post transplant was 28% (CI 16–42). One year incidence of relapse or progression was 39% (CI 25–53). Of the 33 deaths, 16 (49%) were due to progression of leukemia, 5 (15%) were from GVHD, and 4(12%) were from infection.

With a median follow-up of survivors of 13 months (range, 6–81), the 1 year progression-free survival (PFS) is 33% (CI 20–47) (Figure 1). The 1 year overall survival (OS) is 48 % (CI 33–62) with a median OS of 11.2 months (CI 8–14). There was no significant differences in 1 year OS between patients treated with non-myeloablative versus myeloablative transplant, sibling versus matched unrelated donor transplant, age greater than 54 versus age 54 years or less, B-cell versus T-cell PLL, or in first CR versus not in first CR. Neither was there a difference in 2 year OS between patients with either acute or chronic GVHD compared to those without GVHD.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Figure 1

Probablity of A) progression-free survival and B) overall survival after allotransplant for prolymphocytic leukemia (N = 47).

Median PFS for the 21 patients with T-PLL was 5.1 months and 3.5 months for the 11 patients with B-PLL. The 16 patients in CR at transplant had a median PFS of 8.9 months and the 34 patients transplanted with HLA-matched sibling or HLA-well-matched unrelated donors had a median PFS of 5.2 months. 5 patients were still alive and in remission at the time of data analysis.

Although most patients with advanced PLL have poor survival, our data demonstrates that approximately one third of patients are alive and progression-free at 1 year. Consistent with some case-reports indicating long-term progression-free survival in a minority of select patients,(19, 20) and since there is no other effective therapy that provides durable remissions, patients with PLL that are eligible for SCT should consider this option.

Our study is too small and with too heterogenous of a population to explore potentially important questions with regard to which patients may ultimately benefit from an allotransplant. For example, we could not perform a multivariable analysis to determine which risk factors, if any, correlated with outcomes. Nonetheless, our data indicates that at least some patients may derive sustained benefit from an allotransplant. More and larger studies would be required to help identify which patients those would be.

Acknowledgments

CIBMTR is supported by Public Health Service Grant/Cooperative Agreement U24-CA76518 from the National Cancer Institute (NCI), the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID); a Grant/Cooperative Agreement 5U01HL069294 from NHLBI and NCI; a contract HHSH234200637015C with Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA/DHHS); two Grants N00014-06-1-0704 and N00014-08-1-0058 from the Office of Naval Research; and grants from AABB; Aetna; American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation; Amgen, Inc.; Anonymous donation to the Medical College of Wisconsin; Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada; Astellas Pharma US, Inc.; Baxter International, Inc.; Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals; BloodCenter of Wisconsin; Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association; Bone Marrow Foundation; Canadian Blood and Marrow Transplant Group; Celgene Corporation; CellGenix, GmbH; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; ClinImmune Labs; CTI Clinical Trial and Consulting Services; Cubist Pharmaceuticals; Cylex Inc.; CytoTherm; DOR BioPharma, Inc.; Dynal Biotech, an Invitrogen Company; Enzon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation; Gambro BCT, Inc.; Gamida Cell, Ltd.; Genzyme Corporation; Histogenetics, Inc.; HKS Medical Information Systems; Hospira, Inc.; Infectious Diseases Society of America; Kiadis Pharma; Kirin Brewery Co., Ltd.; Merck & Company; The Medical College of Wisconsin; MGI Pharma, Inc.; Michigan Community Blood Centers; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Miller Pharmacal Group; Milliman USA, Inc.; Miltenyi Biotec, Inc.; National Marrow Donor Program; Nature Publishing Group; New York Blood Center; Novartis Oncology; Oncology Nursing Society; Osiris Therapeutics, Inc.; Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.; Pall Life Sciences; PDL BioPharma, Inc; Pfizer Inc; Pharmion Corporation; Saladax Biomedical, Inc.; Schering Plough Corporation; Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America; StemCyte, Inc.; StemSoft Software, Inc.; Sysmex; Teva Pharmaceutical Industries; The Marrow Foundation; THERAKOS, Inc.; Vidacare Corporation; Vion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; ViraCor Laboratories; ViroPharma, Inc.; and Wellpoint, Inc. The views expressed in this article do not reflect the official policy or position of the National Institute of Health, the Department of the Navy, the Department of Defense, or any other agency of the U.S. Government.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Absi A, Hsi E, Kalaycio M. Prolymphocytic leukemia. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2005;6:197–208. doi: 10.1007/s11864-005-0003-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Matutes E, Brito-Babapulle V, Swansbury J, et al. Clinical and laboratory features of 78 cases of T-prolymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 1991;78:3269–3274. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Durig J, Bug S, Klein-Hitpass L, et al. Combined single nucleotide polymorphism-based genomic mapping and global gene expression profiling identifies novel chromosomal imbalances, mechanisms and candidate genes important in the pathogenesis of T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia with inv(14)(q11q32) Leukemia. 2007;21:2153–2163. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pekarsky Y, Hallas C, Croce CM. Molecular basis of mature T-cell leukemia. JAMA. 2001;286:2308–2314. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.18.2308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pekarsky Y, Hallas C, Croce CM. The role of TCL1 in human T-cell leukemia. Oncogene. 2001;20:5638–5643. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Matutes E, Owusu-Ankomah K, Morilla R, et al. The immunological profile of B-cell disorders and proposal of a scoring system for the diagnosis of CLL. Leukemia. 1994;8:1640–1645. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lorand-Metze I, Oliveira GB, Aranha FJ. Treatment of prolymphocytic leukemia with cladribine. Ann Hematol. 1998;76:85–86. doi: 10.1007/s002770050368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mercieca J, Matutes E, Dearden C, MacLennan K, Catovsky D. The role of pentostatin in the treatment of T-cell malignancies: analysis of response rate in 145 patients according to disease subtype. J Clin Oncol. 1994;12:2588–2593. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.12.2588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kantarjian HM, Redman JR, Keating MJ. Fludarabine phosphate therapy in other lymphoid malignancies. Semin Oncol. 1990;17:66–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Montillo M, Tedeschi A, O’Brien S, et al. Phase II study of cladribine and cyclophosphamide in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and prolymphocytic leukemia. Cancer. 2003;97:114–120. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Saven A, Emanuele S, Kosty M, Koziol J, Ellison D, Piro L. 2-Chlorodeoxyadenosine activity in patients with untreated, indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Blood. 1995;86:1710–1716. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dearden CE, Matutes E, Cazin B, et al. High remission rate in T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia with CAMPATH-1H. Blood. 2001;98:1721–1726. doi: 10.1182/blood.v98.6.1721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pawson R, Dyer MJ, Barge R, et al. Treatment of T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia with human CD52 antibody. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:2667–2672. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.7.2667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dearden CE, Matutes E. Alemtuzumab in T-cell lymphoproliferative disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2006;19:795–810. doi: 10.1016/j.beha.2006.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Perz J, Topaly J, Fruehauf S, Hensel M, Ho AD. Level of CD 20-expression and efficacy of rituximab treatment in patients with resistant or relapsing B-cell prolymphocytic leukemia and B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma. 2002;43:149–151. doi: 10.1080/10428190210178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Garderet L, Bittencourt H, Kaliski A, et al. Treatment of T-prolymphocytic leukemia with nonmyeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Eur J Haematol. 2001;66:137–139. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0609.2001.00377.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Collins RH, Pineiro LA, Agura ED, Fay JW. Treatment of T prolymphocytic leukemia with allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1998;21:627–628. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1701127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Murase K, Matsunaga T, Sato T, et al. Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in a patient with T-prolymphocytic leukemia with small-intestinal involvement. Int J Clin Oncol. 2003;8:391–394. doi: 10.1007/s10147-003-0349-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kruspe RC, Ashraf KK, Foran JM, Salzman DE, Reddy VV, Vaughan WP. Successful treatment of T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia with full-intensity conditioning followed by matched unrelated donor allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2007;5:882–884. discussion 884. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Castagna L, Sarina B, Todisco E, Mazza R, Santoro A. Allogeneic peripheral stem-cell transplantation with reduced-intensity conditioning regimen in refractory primary B-cell prolymphocytic leukemia: a long-term follow-up. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2005;35:1225. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1704991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES